ABSTRACT
Patient and family engagement has become a widely accepted approach in health care research. We recognize that research conducted in partnership with people with relevant lived experience can substantially improve the quality of that research and lead to meaningful outcomes. Despite the benefits of patient-researcher collaboration, research teams sometimes face challenges in answering the questions of how patient and family research partners should be compensated, due to the limited guidance and lack of infrastructure for acknowledging partner contributions. In this paper, we present some of the resources that might help teams to navigate conversations about compensation with their patient and family partners and report how existing resources can be leveraged to compensate patient and family partners fairly and appropriately. We also present some of our first-hand experiences with patient and family compensation and offer suggestions for research leaders, agencies, and organizations so that the health care stakeholders can collectively move toward more equitable recognition of patient and family partners in research.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To explore experiences of parents of children with disabilities using the WWW, roadmap, a tool to support them in exploring needs, finding information, and asking questions of professionals and to explore differences between parents who had used the WWW-roadmap to prepare for consultation with their rehabilitation physician and parents who had not. METHODS: In a sequential cohort study, we included 128 parents; 54 used the WWW-roadmap prior to consultation and 74 received care-as-usual. Both groups completed questionnaires after consultation, assessing empowerment, self-efficacy, parent and physician satisfaction, family centredness of care, and experiences using the tool. Additionally, 13 parents were interviewed. RESULTS: Parents who used the WWW-roadmap looked up more information on the Internet. No other differences between parents and physicians were found. In the interviews, parents said that the WWW-roadmap was a useful tool for looking up information, exploring and asking questions, and maintaining a comprehensive picture. CONCLUSION: Using the WWW-roadmap prior to consultation did not improve self-efficacy, satisfaction, or family centredness of care. Findings suggest positive experiences regarding factors determining empowerment, creating conditions for a more equal parent-physician relationship. The WWW-roadmap is useful for parents to explore their needs and find information, but more is needed to support empowerment in consultations.
