Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 204: 110903, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37704109

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of motivational interviewing (MI) performed by MI-trained podiatrists in improving adherence to wearing orthopedic shoes in comparison to usual care in people with diabetes at low-to-high risk of ulceration. METHODS: People with diabetes with loss of protective sensation and/or peripheral artery disease, and with orthopedic shoes prescription were allocated to receive one MI-consultation by a podiatrist randomized to MI training (n = 53) or usual care only (n = 68). Adherence was measured as the percentage of steps taken while wearing orthopedic shoes, determined using an insole temperature microsensor and wrist-worn activity tracker during one week at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: The proportion of participants ≥80 % adherent to wearing their orthopedic shoes was higher in the control group than in the MI-intervention group at 3 months (30.9 % versus 15.1 %; p = 0.044), and not significantly different at 6 months (22.1 % versus 13.2 %; p = 0.210). Average adherence was also higher in the control group than the intervention group at both 3 months (60.9 % versus 50.9 %; p = 0.029) and 6 months (59.9 % versus 49.5 %; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: One podiatrist-led MI-consultation in its current form did not result in higher adherence to wearing orthopedic shoes in people with diabetes 3 and 6 months after inclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL7710 (available on the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform).


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Foot Ulcer , Motivational Interviewing , Peripheral Vascular Diseases , Humans , Shoes , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy
2.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun ; 33: 101107, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36950303

ABSTRACT

Foot ulcers are a frequent and costly problem in people with diabetes mellitus and can lead to amputations. Prevention of these ulcers is therefore of paramount importance. Claw/hammer toe deformities are commonly seen in people with diabetes. These deformities increase the risk of ulcer development specifically at the (tip of) the toe. Percutaneous needle tenotomy of the tendon of the m. flexor digitorum longus (tendon tenotomy) can be used to reduce the severity of claw/hammer toe deformity with the goal to prevent ulcer recurrence. The main objective of this randomized controlled trial is to assess the efficacy of flexor tenotomy to prevent recurrence of toe ulcers in people with diabetes and a history of toe (pre-)ulcers. Additionally, we aim to assess interphalangeal joints (IPJ) and metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) angles in a weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing position, barefoot plantar pressure during walking, cost-effectiveness and quality of life before and after the intervention and compare intervention and control study groups. Sixty-six subjects with diabetes and claw/hammer toe deformity and a recent history of (pre-)ulceration on the tip of the toe will be included and randomized between flexor tenotomy of claw/hammer toes (intervention) versus standard of care including orthosis and shoe offloading (controls) in a mono-center randomized controlled trial. Clinicaltrialsgov registration: NCT05228340.

3.
J Foot Ankle Res ; 15(1): 62, 2022 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35986419

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Podiatrists are key professionals in promoting adequate foot self-care for people with diabetes at high-risk of developing foot ulcers. However, merely informing patients about the advantages of foot self-care is insufficient to realise behavioural change. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a promising person-centred communication style that could help to create a working alliance between healthcare providers and patient to improve foot self-care. This study aims to observe and analyse the application of MI in consultations carried out by MI-trained and non-MI-trained podiatrists with their patients, and explore podiatrists' attitudes and experiences towards MI. METHODS: Eighteen podiatrists (median age: 28.5 years, 10 female and 8 male) followed a three-day basic training in MI and 4 podiatrists (median age: 38.5 years, 4 female) were not trained in MI. To observe and rate the MI-fidelity in daily clinical practice, audio recordings from the MI-trained and non-MI-trained podiatrists were scored with the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity code. Individual, semi-structed, in-depth interviews were conducted with the MI-trained podiatrists to explore their attitudes towards and experiences with MI. These data sources were triangulated to describe the effect of training podiatrists in MI for their clinical practice. RESULTS: The MI-trained podiatrists scored significantly higher than the non-MI-trained podiatrists on two of four global MI-related communication skills (empathy, p = 0.008 and change talk, p = 0.008), on one of five core MI-adherent behaviours (affirmation, p = 0.041) and on one of the other behaviour counts (simple reflections, p = 0.008). The podiatrists mainly reported their attitudes and experiences regarding partnership and cultivating change talk, during the interviews. In addition, they also mentioned facilitators and barriers to using MI and indicated whether they experienced MI as having added value. CONCLUSIONS: The MI-trained podiatrists used the principles of MI at a solid beginner proficiency level in their clinical practice in comparison to the non-MI-trained podiatrists, who did not reach this level. This achievement is in accordance with the basic MI-training they received. This multi-method study reveals that podiatrists can be effectively trained in applying MI in daily clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL7710. Registered: 6 May 2019.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Motivational Interviewing , Adult , Allied Health Personnel , Communication , Diabetic Foot/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Motivational Interviewing/methods , Referral and Consultation
4.
Int J Low Extrem Wounds ; : 15347346221114565, 2022 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35840892

ABSTRACT

We aimed to investigate adherence to at-home monitoring of foot temperature and its association with patient-, disease- and behavior-related factors, in people with diabetes at high risk of ulceration. We analyzed 151 participants in the enhanced therapy arm of the DIATEMP trial (all at high diabetes-related foot ulcer risk) who aimed to perform and log foot temperatures daily for 18 months or until ulceration. Adherence was the proportion of measurement days covered (PDC), with being adherent defined as PDC≥70%. If a hotspot was recorded, adherence to subsequently reducing ambulatory activity was assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate associations with adherence. We found ninety-four participants (62.3%) adherent to measuring foot temperatures. This was higher in months 1-3 versus months 4-18: 118 (78.1%) versus 78 (57.4%; P < .001). Of 83 participants with a hotspot, 24 (28.9%) reduced ambulatory activity. Increasing age (P = .021, OR = 1.045) and better self-care (P = .007, OR = 1.513) were positively associated with adherence to measuring foot temperature. In conclusion, in people at high diabetes-related foot ulcer risk, adherence to measuring foot temperature was high in the first months after study commencing, but dropped over time. Adherence to reducing ambulatory activity when a hotspot was found was low over the entire study period.

5.
Trials ; 22(1): 750, 2021 Oct 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34711263

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers have a high impact on mobility and daily functioning and lead to high treatment costs, for example, by hospitalization and amputation. To prevent (re)ulcerations, custom-made orthopedic shoes are considered essential. However, adherence to wearing the orthopedic shoes is low, and improving adherence was not successful in the past. We propose a novel care approach that combines motivational interviewing (MI) with a digital shoe-fitting procedure to improve adherence to orthopedic shoes. The aim of this trial is to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of this novel care approach compared to usual care (no MI and casting-based shoe-fitting) in promoting footwear adherence and ulcer prevention. METHODS: The trial will include people with diabetes, with IWGDF Risk categories 1-3, who have been prescribed orthopedic shoes. Participants will be randomized at the level of the podiatrist to the novel care approach or usual care. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants who adhere to the use of their orthopedic shoes, that is, who take at least 80% of their total daily steps with orthopedic shoes. A temperature microsensor will be built into the participants' orthopedic shoes to measure wearing time continuously over 12 months. In addition, daily activity will be measured periodically using log data with an activity monitor. Data from the temperature microsensor and activity monitor will be combined to calculate adherence. (Re-)experienced complications after receiving orthopedic shoes will be registered. Questionnaires and interviews will measure the experiences of participants regarding orthopedic shoes, experiences of podiatrists regarding motivational interviewing, care consumption, and quality of life. Differences in costs and quality of life will be determined in a cost-effectiveness analysis. DISCUSSION: This trial will generate novel insights into the socio-economic and well-being impact and the clinical effectiveness of the novel care approach on adherence to wearing orthopedic shoes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL7710 . Registered on 6 May 2019.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Motivational Interviewing , Activities of Daily Living , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/prevention & control , Humans , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Shoes
6.
Physiol Meas ; 40(6): 065002, 2019 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31071696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A major challenge for treating diabetic foot ulcers is estimating the severity of ischemia, as the currently used non-invasive diagnostic techniques provide relatively poor prognostic values. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is a promising non-invasive technique to assess microcirculation. Our aim was to investigate the stability and reproducibility of LSCI for the assessment of microcirculation in the diabetic foot, the relation of LSCI results to currently used non-invasive blood pressure measurements, and the ability of LSCI to discriminate between the degrees of ischemia. APPROACH: Thirty-three participants with diabetic foot ulcers were included in this prospective, single centre, observational cohort study that was conducted in the Netherlands. They were classified as non-ischemic, ischemic or critical-ischemic based on criteria formulated in the international guidelines. Two clinicians performed LSCI scans of the foot, consisting of baseline measurements, followed by two stress tests (post-occlusion peak and elevation test). With three measurement conditions and five regions of interest of the foot per patient, a total of 15 measurements were available for analyses. MAIN RESULTS: The intra-observer agreement of LSCI was high (interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.711-0.950; p  < 0.001) for all 15 measurements. The inter-observer agreement was high (ICC = 0.728-0.861; p  ⩽ 0.001) for 10 measurements and moderate (ICC = 0.476-0.570; p  ⩽ 0.005) for the remaining five measurements. The inter-assessor agreement was high and significant (ICC = 0.857-0.996; p  ⩽ 0.001) for all measurements. Correlation between LSCI and non-invasive blood pressure measurements was low (ICC = -0.272-0.582). During both stress tests, microcirculation was significantly lower in critical-ischemic feet compared to non-ischemic feet (67.5 perfusion units (PU) versus 96.3 PU and 41.0 PU versus 63.9 PU; p  < 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: LSCI is a stable and reproducible technique for assessment of microcirculation in people with diabetic foot ulcers and shows significant differences between non-ischemic, ischemic and critical-ischemic patient populations.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/chemistry , Diabetic Foot/diagnostic imaging , Diabetic Foot/physiopathology , Diagnostic Imaging , Lasers , Microcirculation/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Blood Pressure , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
7.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 149: 132-139, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738090

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Infrared thermal imaging (IR) is not yet routinely implemented for early detection of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), despite proven clinical effectiveness. Low-cost, smartphone-based IR-cameras are now available and may lower the threshold for implementation, but the quality of these cameras is unknown. We aim to validate a smartphone-based IR-camera against a high-end IR-camera for diabetic foot assessment. METHODS: We acquired plantar IR images of feet of 32 participants with a current or recently healed DFU with the smartphone-based FLIR-One and the high-end FLIR-SC305. Contralateral temperature differences of the entire plantar foot and nine pre-specified regions were compared for validation. Intra-class correlations coefficient (ICC(3,1)) and Bland-Altman plots were used to test agreement. Clinical validity was assessed by calculating statistical measures of diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Almost perfect agreement was found for temperature measurements in both the entire plantar foot and the combined pre-specified regions, respectively, with ICC values of 0.987 and 0.981, Bland-Altman plots' mean Δ = -0.14 and Δ = -0.06. Diagnostic accuracy showed 94% and 93% sensitivity, and 86% and 91% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The smartphone-based IR-camera shows excellent validity for diabetic foot assessment.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Smartphone/instrumentation , Aged , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diabetic Foot/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Smartphone/economics
8.
Diabet Med ; 2018 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29791033

ABSTRACT

Globally ~435 million people have diabetes [1], and an estimated 19-34% (~83-148 million people) of those will be expected to develop foot ulcers in their lifetime [2]. Foot ulcers are typically precipitated by other diabetes-related lower-extremity complications, (DRLECs) including peripheral neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease [2,3]. Collectively, DRLECs are a leading cause of infection, hospitalization and amputation outcomes [2-5], yet, these outcomes are readily preventable with evidence-based care [6,7]. This suggests the burden caused by DRLECs is a large, yet reducible, cause of the global burden of disease. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

9.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 137(4): 507-515, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28233062

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of complications in elderly patients with a hip fracture following integrated orthogeriatric treatment. To discover factors that might be adjusted, in order to improve outcome in those patients, we examined the association between baseline patient characteristics and a complicated course. METHODS: We included patients aged 70 years and older with a hip fracture, who were treated at the Centre for Geriatric Traumatology (CvGT) at Ziekenhuisgroep Twente (ZGT) Almelo, the Netherlands between April 2011 and October 2013. Data registration was carried out using the clinical pathways of the CvGT database. Based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, patients were divided into high-risk (HR, ASA 3 ≥, n = 341) and low-risk (LR, ASA 1-2, n = 111) groups and compared on their recovery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for a complicated course. RESULTS: The analysis demonstrated that 49.6% (n = 224) of the patients experienced a complicated course with an in-hospital mortality rate of 3.8% (n = 17). In 57.5% (n = 196) of the HR patients, a complicated course was seen compared to 25.2% (n = 28) of the LR patients. The most common complications in both groups were the occurrence of delirium (HR 25.8% vs. LR 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001), anemia (HR 19.4% vs. LR 6.3%, p = 0.001), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) (HR 10.6% vs. LR 7.2%, p = 0.301) and pneumonia (HR 10.9% vs. LR 5.4%, p = 0.089). Independent risk factors for a complicated course were increasing age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.023), delirium risk VMS Frailty score (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.04-2.37, p = 0.031) and ASA score ≥3 (OR 3.62, 95% CI 2.22-5.91, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After integrated orthogeriatric treatment, a complicated course was seen in 49.6% of the patients with a hip fracture. The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.8%. Important risk factors for a complicated course were increasing age, poor medical condition and delirium risk VMS Frailty score. Awareness of risk factors that affect the course during admission can be useful in optimizing care and outcomes. In the search for possible areas for improvement in care, targeted preventive measures to mitigate delirium, and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), such as CAUTIs and pneumonia are important.


Subject(s)
Anemia/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Delirium/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/surgery , Hospital Mortality , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Female , Geriatrics , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Myocardial Infarction , Netherlands/epidemiology , Orthopedics , Patient Care Team , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Stroke/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology
10.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 124: 84-92, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28119194

ABSTRACT

Foot problems complicating diabetes are a source of major patient suffering and societal costs. To prevent, or at least reduce, the adverse effects of foot problems in diabetes, the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF; www.iwgdf.org) was founded in 1996, consisting of experts from almost all the disciplines involved in the care of patients with diabetes and foot problems. An important output of the IWGDF is the international consensus guidance, continuously updated since 1999. To date, the publications have been translated into 26 languages, and more than 100,000 copies have been distributed globally. The "Summary Guidance for Daily Practice" summarises the essentials of prevention and management of foot problems in persons with diabetes for clinicians who work with these patients on a daily basis. This guidance is the result of a long and careful process that started with the empaneling in 2013 of five working groups consisting of 49 international experts. These experts performed seven targeted systematic reviews to provide the evidence supporting the five chapters of the IWGDF Guidance on prevention; footwear and offloading; diagnosis, prognosis and management of peripheral artery disease; diagnosis and management of foot infections; interventions to enhance healing. In total almost 80,000 studies were detected by our literature review. After review of the title and abstract the reviewers of the different working groups selected only studies that fulfilled a minimal set of quality criteria and ended up with 429 articles for complete quality analysis. The GRADE system was used to translate the evidence from the studies into recommendations for daily clinical practice. The rating of each recommendation takes into account both the strength and the quality of the evidence. The IWGDF Guidance 2015 makes a total of 77 recommendations on prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes. These recommendations were condensed by the editorial board into this "Summary Guidance". Encouraging and aiding clinicians to follow the evidence-based recommendations of the IWGDF Guidance 2015, and in particular the principles outlined in the "Summary Guidance", will likely result in a worldwide reduction in, and better outcomes of, foot problems in persons with diabetes, helping to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with this major health problem.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Diabetic Foot/prevention & control , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Consensus , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Internationality , Societies, Medical/standards , Wound Healing
12.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 32 Suppl 1: 7-15, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26335366

ABSTRACT

In this 'Summary Guidance for Daily Practice', we describe the basic principles of prevention and management of foot problems in persons with diabetes. This summary is based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) Guidance 2015. There are five key elements that underpin prevention of foot problems: (1) identification of the at-risk foot; (2) regular inspection and examination of the at-risk foot; (3) education of patient, family and healthcare providers; (4) routine wearing of appropriate footwear; and (5) treatment of pre-ulcerative signs. Healthcare providers should follow a standardized and consistent strategy for evaluating a foot wound, as this will guide further evaluation and therapy. The following items must be addressed: type, cause, site and depth, and signs of infection. There are seven key elements that underpin ulcer treatment: (1) relief of pressure and protection of the ulcer; (2) restoration of skin perfusion; (3) treatment of infection; (4) metabolic control and treatment of co-morbidity; (5) local wound care; (6) education for patient and relatives; and (7) prevention of recurrence. Finally, successful efforts to prevent and manage foot problems in diabetes depend upon a well-organized team, using a holistic approach in which the ulcer is seen as a sign of multi-organ disease, and integrating the various disciplines involved.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Angiopathies/therapy , Diabetic Foot/prevention & control , Diabetic Neuropathies/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Global Health , Precision Medicine , Combined Modality Therapy/trends , Diabetic Angiopathies/complications , Diabetic Angiopathies/physiopathology , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/etiology , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Diabetic Neuropathies/complications , Diabetic Neuropathies/physiopathology , Early Diagnosis , Holistic Health , Humans , International Agencies , Patient Care Team/trends , Patient Education as Topic , Recurrence , Severity of Illness Index , Shoes/adverse effects , Soft Tissue Infections/complications , Soft Tissue Infections/prevention & control
13.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 32 Suppl 1: 2-6, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26409930

ABSTRACT

Foot problems complicating diabetes are a source of major patient suffering and societal costs. Investing in evidence-based, internationally appropriate diabetic foot care guidance is likely among the most cost-effective forms of healthcare expenditure, provided it is goal-focused and properly implemented. The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has been publishing and updating international Practical Guidelines since 1999. The 2015 updates are based on systematic reviews of the literature, and recommendations are formulated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system. As such, we changed the name from 'Practical Guidelines' to 'Guidance'. In this article we describe the development of the 2015 IWGDF Guidance documents on prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes. This Guidance consists of five documents, prepared by five working groups of international experts. These documents provide guidance related to foot complications in persons with diabetes on: prevention; footwear and offloading; peripheral artery disease; infections; and, wound healing interventions. Based on these five documents, the IWGDF Editorial Board produced a summary guidance for daily practice. The resultant of this process, after reviewed by the Editorial Board and by international IWGDF members of all documents, is an evidence-based global consensus on prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes. Plans are already under way to implement this Guidance. We believe that following the recommendations of the 2015 IWGDF Guidance will almost certainly result in improved management of foot problems in persons with diabetes and a subsequent worldwide reduction in the tragedies caused by these foot problems.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Global Health , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy/trends , Consensus , Diabetic Foot/prevention & control , Evidence-Based Medicine/trends , Humans , International Agencies
14.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 32 Suppl 1: 84-98, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26340966

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prevention of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes is extremely important to help reduce the enormous burden of foot ulceration on both patient and health resources. A comprehensive analysis of reported interventions is not currently available, but is needed to better inform caregivers about effective prevention. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of interventions to prevent first and recurrent foot ulcers in persons with diabetes who are at risk for ulceration. METHODS: The available medical scientific literature in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane database was searched for original research studies on preventative interventions. Both controlled and non-controlled studies were selected. Data from controlled studies were assessed for methodological quality by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: From the identified records, a total of 30 controlled studies (of which 19 RCTs) and another 44 non-controlled studies were assessed and described. Few controlled studies, of generally low to moderate quality, were identified on the prevention of a first foot ulcer. For the prevention of recurrent plantar foot ulcers, multiple RCTs with low risk of bias show the benefit for the use of daily foot skin temperature measurements and consequent preventative actions, as well as for therapeutic footwear that demonstrates to relieve plantar pressure and that is worn by the patient. To prevent recurrence, some evidence exists for integrated foot care when it includes a combination of professional foot treatment, therapeutic footwear and patient education; for just a single session of patient education, no evidence exists. Surgical interventions can be effective in selected patients, but the evidence base is small. CONCLUSION: The evidence base to support the use of specific self-management and footwear interventions for the prevention of recurrent plantar foot ulcers is quite strong, but is small for the use of other, sometimes widely applied, interventions and is practically nonexistent for the prevention of a first foot ulcer and non-plantar foot ulcer.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diabetic Foot/prevention & control , Evidence-Based Medicine , Precision Medicine , Combined Modality Therapy/trends , Cost of Illness , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/etiology , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Humans , Patient Compliance , Patient Education as Topic , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Self Care/trends , Shoes/adverse effects
15.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 51(2): 248-57, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26588994

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Lower limb amputation is often associated with a high risk of early post-operative mortality. Mortality rates are also increasingly being put forward as a possible benchmark for surgical performance. The primary aim of this systematic review is to investigate early post-operative mortality following a major lower limb amputation in population/regional based studies, and reported factors that might influence these mortality outcomes. METHODS: Embase, PubMed, Cinahl and Psycinfo were searched for publications in any language on 30 day or in hospital mortality after major lower limb amputation in population/regional based studies. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A self developed checklist was used to assess quality and susceptibility to bias. Summary data were extracted for the percentage of the population who died; pooling of quantitative results was not possible because of methodological differences between studies. RESULTS: Of the 9,082 publications identified, results were included from 21. The percentage of the population undergoing amputation who died within 30 days ranged from 7% to 22%, the in hospital equivalent was 4-20%. Transfemoral amputation and older age were found to have a higher proportion of early post-operative mortality, compared with transtibial and younger age, respectively. Other patient factors or surgical treatment choices related to increased early post-operative mortality varied between studies. CONCLUSIONS: Early post-operative mortality rates vary from 4% to 22%. There are very limited data presented for patient related factors (age, comorbidities) that influence mortality. Even less is known about factors related to surgical treatment choices, being limited to amputation level. More information is needed to allow comparison across studies or for any benchmarking of acceptable mortality rates. Agreement is needed on key factors to be reported.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/mortality , Lower Extremity/surgery , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Age Factors , Amputation, Surgical/adverse effects , Amputation, Surgical/methods , Comorbidity , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Odds Ratio , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
16.
Child Care Health Dev ; 41(1): 23-34, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24283800

ABSTRACT

Children with developmental co-ordination disorder (DCD) face evident motor difficulties in activities of daily living (ADL). Assessment of their capacity in ADL is essential for diagnosis and intervention, in order to limit the daily consequences of the disorder. The aim of this study is to systematically review potential instruments for standardized and objective assessment of children's capacity in ADL, suited for children with DCD. As a first step, databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched to identify studies that described instruments with potential for assessment of capacity in ADL. Second, instruments were included for review when two independent reviewers agreed that the instruments (1) are standardized and objective; (2) assess at activity level and comprise items that reflect ADL; and (3) are applicable to school-aged children that can move independently. Out of 1507 publications, 66 publications were selected, describing 39 instruments. Seven of these instruments were found to fulfil the criteria and were included for review: the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Performance-2 (BOT2); the Do-Eat (Do-Eat); the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC2); the school-Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (schoolAMPS); the Tuffts Assessment of Motor Performance (TAMP); the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD); and the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM). As a third step, for the included instruments, suitability for children with DCD was discussed based on the ADL comprised, ecological validity and other psychometric properties. We concluded that current instruments do not provide comprehensive and ecologically valid assessment of capacity in ADL as required for children with DCD.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Disability Evaluation , Motor Skills Disorders/physiopathology , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Bibliographic , Humans , Infant , Motor Skills Disorders/diagnosis , Young Adult
17.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 46(1): 124-31, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23628328

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine mortality rates after a first lower limb amputation and explore the rates for different subpopulations. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all people who underwent a first amputation at or proximal to transtibial level, in an area of 1.7 million people. Analysis with Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank tests for univariate associations of psycho-social and health variables. Logistic regression for odds of death at 30-days, 1-year and 5-years. RESULTS: 299 people were included. Median time to death was 20.3 months (95%CI: 13.1; 27.5). 30-day mortality = 22%; odds of death 2.3 times higher in people with history of cerebrovascular disease (95%CI: 1.2; 4.7, P = 0.016). 1 year mortality = 44%; odds of death 3.5 times higher for people with renal disease (95%CI: 1.8; 7.0, P < 0.001). 5-years mortality = 77%; odds of death 5.4 times higher for people with renal disease (95%CI: 1.8; 16.0,P = 0.003). Variation in mortality rates was most apparent in different age groups; people 75-84 years having better short term outcomes than those younger and older. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates demonstrated the frailty of this population, with almost one quarter of people dying within 30-days, and almost half at 1 year. People with cerebrovascular had higher odds of death at 30 days, and those with renal disease and 1 and 5 years, respectively.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/mortality , Lower Extremity/surgery , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL