ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare situation awareness (SA), visual attention (VA) and protocol adherence in simulated neonatal resuscitations using two different monitor positions. DESIGN: Randomised controlled simulation study. SETTINGS: Simulation lab at the Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare providers (HCPs) with Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) certification within the last 2 years and trained in neonatal endotracheal intubations. INTERVENTION: HCPs were randomised to either central (eye-level on the radiant warmer) or peripheral (above eye-level, wall-mounted) monitor positions. Each led a complex resuscitation with a high-fidelity mannequin and a standardised assistant. To measure SA, situation awareness global assessment tool (SAGAT) was used, where simulations were paused at three predetermined points, with five questions asked each pause. Videos were analysed for SAGAT and adherence to a NRP checklist. Eye-tracking glasses recorded participants' VA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome was SA as measured by composite SAGAT score. Secondary outcomes included VA and adherence to NRP checklist. RESULTS: Thirty simulations were performed; 29 were completed per protocol and analysed. Twenty-two eye-tracking recordings were of sufficient quality and analysed. Median composite SAGAT was 11.5/15 central versus 11/15 peripheral, p=0.56. Checklist scores 46/50 central versus 46/50 peripheral, p=0.75. Most VA was directed at the mannequin (30.6% central vs 34.1% peripheral, p=0.76), and the monitor (28.7% central vs 20.5% peripheral, p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation, SAGAT and eye-tracking can be used to evaluate human factors of neonatal resuscitation. During simulated neonatal resuscitation, monitor position did not affect SA, VA or protocol adherence.
Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Awareness/physiology , Clinical Protocols/standards , Health Personnel/psychology , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Canada , Eye Movements , Humans , Incubators, Infant , Infant, Newborn , Manikins , Pilot Projects , Random Allocation , Simulation TrainingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often unexpected, and the infrequent use of CPR in the delivery room (DR) limits the opportunity to perform rigorous clinical studies to determine the best method for delivering chest compression (CC) to newborn infants. The current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend using a coordinated 3:1 compression-to-ventilation (C:V) ratio (CC at a rate of 90/min and ventilations at a rate of 30/min). In comparison, providing CC during a sustained inflation (SI) (CC + SI) significantly improved hemodynamics, minute ventilation, and time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) compared to 3:1 C:V ratio in asphyxiated piglets. Similarly, a small pilot trial in newborn infants showed similar results. Until now no study has examined different CC techniques during neonatal resuscitation in asphyxiated newborn infants in the DR. To date, no trial has been performed to directly compare CC + SI and 3:1 C:V ratio in the DR during CPR of asphyxiated newborn infants. METHODS: This is a large, international, multi-center, prospective, unblinded, cluster randomized controlled trial in asphyxiated newborn infants at birth. All term and preterm infants > 28+ 0 by best obstetrical estimate who require CPR at birth due to bradycardia (< 60/min) or asystole are eligible. The primary outcome of this study is to compare the time to ROSC in infants born > 28+ 0 weeks' gestational age with bradycardia (< 60/min) or asystole immediately after birth who receive either CC + SI or 3:1 C:V ratio as the CPR strategy. DISCUSSION: Morbidity and mortality rates are extremely high for newborns requiring CC. We believe the combination of simultaneous CC and SI during CPR has the potential to significantly improve ROSC and survival. In addition, we believe that CC + SI might improve respiratory and hemodynamic parameters and potentially minimize morbidity and mortality in newborn infants. In addition, this will be the first randomized controlled trial to examine CC in the newborn period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02858583 . Registered on 8 August 2016.
Subject(s)
Asphyxia Neonatorum/therapy , Bradycardia/therapy , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Heart Arrest/therapy , Heart Massage , Respiration, Artificial , Asia , Asphyxia Neonatorum/diagnosis , Asphyxia Neonatorum/physiopathology , Australia , Bradycardia/diagnosis , Bradycardia/physiopathology , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/adverse effects , Europe , Gestational Age , Heart Arrest/diagnosis , Heart Arrest/physiopathology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Multicenter Studies as Topic , North America , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recovery of Function , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Approximately, 10-20% of newborns require breathing assistance at birth, which remains the cornerstone of neonatal resuscitation. Fortunately, the need for chest compression (CC) or medications in the delivery room (DR) is rare. About 0.1% of term infants and up to 15% of preterm infants receive these interventions, this will result in approximately one million newborn deaths annually worldwide. In addition, CC or medications (epinephrine) are more frequent in the preterm population (~15%) due to birth asphyxia. A recent study reported that only 6 per 10,000 infants received epinephrine in the DR. Further, the study reported that infants receiving epinephrine during resuscitation had a high incidence of mortality (41%) and short-term neurologic morbidity (57% hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and seizures). A recent review of newborns who received prolonged CC and epinephrine but had no signs of life at 10 min following birth noted 83% mortality, with 93% of survivors suffering moderate-to-severe disability. The poor prognosis associated with receiving CC alone or with medications in the DR raises questions as to whether improved cardiopulmonary resuscitation methods specifically tailored to the newborn could improve outcomes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Visual attention (VA) is important for situation awareness and decision-making. Eye tracking can be used to analyse the VA of healthcare providers. No study has examined eye tracking during neonatal resuscitation. OBJECTIVE: To test the use of eye tracking to examine VA during neonatal resuscitation. METHODS: Six video recordings were obtained using eye tracking glasses worn by resuscitators during the first 5 min of neonatal resuscitation. Videos were analysed to obtain (i) areas of interest (AOIs), (ii) time spent on each AOI and (iii) frequency of saccades between AOIs. RESULTS: Five videos were of acceptable quality and analysed. Only 35% of VA was directed at the infant, with 33% at patient monitors and gauges. There were frequent saccades (0.45/s) and most involved patient monitors. CONCLUSION: During neonatal resuscitation, VA is often directed away from the infant towards patient monitors. Eye tracking can be used to analyse human performance during neonatal resuscitation.
Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Eye Movement Measurements/instrumentation , Health Personnel , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Resuscitation , Clinical Decision-Making , Equipment Design , Eyeglasses , Female , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neonatology/methods , Pilot Projects , Resuscitation/methods , Resuscitation/psychology , Saccades , Video Recording , Work PerformanceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend 3:1 compression:ventilation (C:V) ratio. Recently, animal studies reported that continuous chest compressions (CC) during a sustained inflation (SI) significantly improved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The approach of CC during SI (CC+SI) has not been examined in the delivery room during neonatal resuscitation. HYPOTHESIS: It is a feasibility study to compare CC+SI versus 3:1 C:V ratio during neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room. We hypothesised that during neonatal resuscitation, CC+SI will reduce the time to ROSC. Our aim was to examine if CC+SI reduces ROSC compared with 3:1 C:V CPR in preterm infants <33 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: Randomised feasibility trial. METHOD: Once CC was indicated all eligible infants were immediately and randomly allocated to either CC+SI group or 3:1 C:V group. A sequentially numbered, brown, sealed envelope contained a folded card box with the treatment allocation was opened by the clinical team at the start of CC. STUDY INTERVENTIONS: Infants in the CC+SI group received CC at a rate of 90/min during an SI with a duration of 20 s (CC+SI). After 20 s, the SI was interrupted for 1 s and the next SI was started for another 20 s until ROSC. Infants in the '3:1 group' received CC using 3:1 C:V ratio until ROSC. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Overall the mean (SD) time to ROSC was significantly shorter in the CC+SI group with 31 (9) s compared with 138 (72) s in the 3:1 C:V group (p=0.011). CONCLUSION: CC+SI is feasible in the delivery room. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02083705, pre-results.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Heart Arrest , Heart Massage/methods , Blood Circulation/physiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Heart Arrest/physiopathology , Heart Arrest/therapy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Insufflation/methods , Male , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: A sustained inflation (SI) provided at birth might reduce bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine whether an SI-guided exhaled carbon dioxide (ECO2) compared with positive pressure ventilation (PPV) alone at birth decreases BPD. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. Infants were randomly allocated to either SI (SI group) or PPV (PPV group). PARTICIPANTS: Participants of this study include infants between 23+0 and 32+6 weeks gestation with a need for PPV at birth. INTERVENTION: Infants randomised into the SI group received an initial SI with a peak inflation pressure (PIP) of 24 cmH2O over 20 s. The second SI was guided by the amount of ECO2. If ECO2 was ≤20 mm Hg, a further SI of 20 s was delivered. If ECO2 was >20 mm Hg the second SI was 10 s. Infants randomised into the PPV group received mask PPV with an initial PIP of 24 cmH2O. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Reduction in BPD defined as the need for respiratory support or supplemental oxygen at corrected gestational age of 36 weeks. RESULTS: SI (n=76) and PPV (n=86) group had similar rates of BPD (23% vs 33%, p=0.090, not statistically significant). The duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly reduced with SI versus PPV (63 (10-246) hours versus 204 (17-562) hours, respectively (p=0.045)). No short-term harmful effects were identified from two SI lasting up to 40 s (eg, pneumothorax, intraventricular haemorrhage or patent ductus arteriosus). CONCLUSION: Preterm infants <33 weeks gestation receiving SI at birth had lower duration of mechanical ventilation and similar incidence of BPD compared with PPV. Using ECO2 to guide length of SI is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01739114; Results.
Subject(s)
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia/epidemiology , Carbon Dioxide/metabolism , Insufflation/methods , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Insufflation/adverse effects , Male , Positive-Pressure Respiration/adverse effects , Respiratory Function TestsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early studies suggest an association of abnormal carbon dioxide (PCO2) or oxygen (PO2) levels with adverse inpatient outcomes in very preterm babies. Recent resuscitation practice changes, such as targeted oxygen therapy, end-expiratory pressure, and rescue surfactant may influence these associations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the range of the initial partial pressures of PCO2 and PO2 in preterm neonates <33 weeks gestational age after birth and their correlation to inpatient neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective observational cohort study of infants <33 weeks gestational age with arterial or venous blood gas analysis performed within the first hour after birth. RESULTS: One hundred seventy infants (arterial n = 75, venous n = 95) with mean (SD) gestational age of 28 (3) weeks and birth weight of 1,111 (403) g were included. None of the infants with arterial blood gases had hypocarbia (<30 mmHg), 32 (43%) had normocarbia (30-55 mmHg), and 43 (57%) had hypercarbia (>55 mmHg). Seventeen of the infants with arterial blood gases (22%) had hypoxia (<50 mmHg), 50 (67%) normoxia, and 8 (11%) hyperoxia (>80 mmHg). In infants with venous blood samples, none had venous PCO2 < 40 mmHg, 41 (43%) had venous PCO2 40-60 mmHg, and 54 (57%) had venous PCO2 > 60 mmHg. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no association of low or high PCO2 or PO2 with death or major inpatient morbidities. CONCLUSION: With current resuscitation and stabilization practices, hyperoxia and hypocarbia was uncommon, and hypercarbia occurred frequently. None of these findings correlate with adverse inpatient outcomes or death. Our findings are in direct contrast to published observations using historical practices.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare tidal volume (VT) delivery and ventilation rate between devices for positive pressure ventilation (PPV) during newborn resuscitation. METHODS: Neonatal resuscitation program providers (n = 25) delivered PPV to a newborn manikin in a randomized order with: a self-inflating bag (SIB), a disposable T-piece, a non-disposable T-piece, a stand-alone infant resuscitation system T-piece and the volume-controlled prototype Next StepTM device (KM Medical). All T-pieces used a peak inflation pressure of 20cmH2O and a 5cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The SIB neither had a PEEP valve nor manometer. The Next StepTM had a 5cmH2O PEEP valve. The participants aimed to deliver a 5 mL/kg VT (rate 40-60 min-1) for 1 min with each device and each of three compliances (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mL/cmH2O). VT and ventilation rate were compared between devices and compliance levels (ANOVA) Results: All devices, except the Next StepTM delivered a 4-5 mL/kg VT at the low compliance, but three- to four-fold that of the target at the higher compliance levels. The Next StepTM delivered a VT close to target at all compliance levels. The ventilation rate was within 40-60 min-1 with all devices and compliance levels. CONCLUSIONS: Routinely used ventilation devices for newborn resuscitation can triple intended VT and requires further investigation.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/instrumentation , Positive-Pressure Respiration/instrumentation , Respiratory Rate , Analysis of Variance , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Cross-Over Studies , Equipment Design , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Manikins , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Prospective Studies , Random Allocation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tidal VolumeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in preductal oxygen saturation (SpO2) and heart rate in preterm infants receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and/or positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) at birth. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study at birth of infants aged <32 weeks separated into 2 gestational age (GA) groups: 230/7-276/7 weeks (group 1) and 280/7-316/7 weeks (group 2). Infants received delayed cord clamping (DCC) in accordance with institutional protocol. CPAP and/or PPV was applied at the clinical team's discretion. SpO2 and heart rate were recorded every minute for 10 minutes. Preductal SpO2 was targeted according to published nomograms. For heart rate, the goal was to maintain a stable heart rate >100 bpm. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 96 group 1 infants (mean GA, 26 ± 1 weeks; mean birth weight, 818 ± 208 g) and 173 group 2 infants (mean GA, 30 ± 1 weeks; mean birth weight, 1438 ± 374 g). In general, infants requiring respiratory support reached target values for heart rate and SpO2 more slowly than the published nomograms for spontaneously breathing preterm infants without respiratory support. Infants receiving CPAP reached SpO2 and heart rate targets faster than infants receiving PPV. In group 1, but not group 2 infants, DCC resulted in higher SpO2 and heart rate. CONCLUSION: SpO2 and heart rate do not quickly and reliably reach the values achieved by spontaneously breathing preterm infants not requiring respiratory support.
Subject(s)
Heart Rate/physiology , Oxygen/blood , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Umbilical Cord/physiology , Constriction , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature/physiology , Male , Oximetry , Prospective Studies , RespirationABSTRACT
The objective of this randomized controlled manikin trial was to examine tidal volume (VT) delivery and ventilation rate during mask positive pressure ventilation (PPV) with five different devices, including a volume-controlled prototype Next Step™ device for neonatal resuscitation. We hypothesized that VT and rate would be closest to target with the Next Step™. Twenty-five Neonatal Resuscitation Program providers provided mask PPV to a newborn manikin (simulated weight 1 kg) in a randomized order with a self-inflating bag (SIB), a disposable T-piece, a non-disposable T-piece, a stand-alone resuscitation system T-piece, and the Next Step™. All T-pieces used a peak inflation pressure of 20 cmH2O and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O. The participants were instructed to deliver a 5 mL/kg VT (rate 40-60/min) for 1 min with each device and each of three test lungs with increasing compliance of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mL/cmH2O. VT and ventilation rate were compared between devices and compliance levels (linear mixed model). All devices, except the Next Step™ delivered a too high VT, up to sixfold the target at the 2.0-mL/cmH2O compliance. The Next Step™ VT was 26% lower than the target in the low compliance. The ventilation rate was within target with the Next Step™ and SIB, and slightly lower with the T-pieces. In conclusion, routinely used newborn resuscitators over delivered VT, whereas the Next Step™ under delivered in the low compliant test lung. The SIB had higher VT and rate than the T-pieces. More research is needed on volume-controlled delivery room ventilation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Heart rate assessment immediately after birth in newborn infants is critical to the correct guidance of resuscitation efforts. There are disagreements as to the best method to measure heart rate. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess different methods of heart rate assessment in newborn infants at birth to determine the fastest and most accurate method. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar were systematically searched using the following terms: 'infant', 'heart rate', 'monitoring', 'delivery room', 'resuscitation', 'stethoscope', 'auscultation', 'palpation', 'pulse oximetry', 'electrocardiogram', 'Doppler ultrasound', 'photoplethysmography' and 'wearable sensors'. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were identified that described various methods of heart rate assessment in newborn infants immediately after birth. Studies examining auscultation, palpation, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography and Doppler ultrasound as ways to measure heart rate were included. Heart rate measurements by pulse oximetry are superior to auscultation and palpation, but there is contradictory evidence about its accuracy depending on whether the sensor is connected to the infant or the oximeter first. Several studies indicate that electrocardiogram provides a reliable heart rate faster than pulse oximetry. Doppler ultrasound shows potential for clinical use, however future evidence is needed to support this conclusion. CONCLUSION: Heart rate assessment is important and there are many measurement methods. The accuracy of routinely applied methods varies, with palpation and auscultation being the least accurate and electrocardiogram being the most accurate. More research is needed on Doppler ultrasound before its clinical use.
Subject(s)
Heart Function Tests/methods , Heart Rate , Infant, Newborn/physiology , Humans , Neonatal Screening , ResuscitationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the temporal course of lung aeration at birth in preterm infants <33 weeks gestation. STUDY DESIGN: The research team attended deliveries of preterm infants <33 weeks gestation at the Royal Alexandra Hospital. Infants who received only continuous positive airway pressure were eligible for inclusion. A combined carbon dioxide (CO2) and flow-sensor was placed between the mask and the ventilation device. To analyze lung aeration patterns during spontaneous breathing, tidal volume (VT), and exhaled CO2 (ECO2) were recorded for the first 100 breaths. RESULTS: Thirty preterm infants were included with a total of 1512 breaths with mask leak <30%. Mean (SD) gestational age and birth weight was 30 (1) weeks and 1478 (430) g. Initial VT and ECO2 for the first 30 breaths was 5-6 mL/kg and 15-22 mm Hg, respectively. VT and ECO2 increased over the next 20 breaths to 7-8 mL/kg and 25-32 mm Hg, respectively. For the remaining observation period VT decreased to 4-6 mL/kg and ECO2 continued to increase to 35-37 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Preterm infants begin taking deeper breaths approximately 30 breaths after initiating spontaneous breathing to inflate their lungs. Concurrent CO2 removal rises as alveoli are recruited. Lung aeration occurs in 2 phases: initially, large volume breaths with poor alveolar aeration followed by smaller breaths with elimination of CO2 as a consequence of adequate aeration.
Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide/metabolism , Infant, Premature/physiology , Lung/physiology , Respiration , Canada , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lung/metabolism , Male , Tidal Volume/physiologyABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Respiratory support in the delivery room remains challenging. Assessing chest rise is imprecise, and mask leak and airway obstruction are common problems. We describe recordings of respiratory signals during delivery room resuscitations and discuss guidance on positive-pressure ventilation using respiratory parameters and exhaled carbon dioxide (ECO2 ) during neonatal resuscitations. CONCLUSION: Observing tidal volume and ECO2 waveforms adds objectivity to clinical assessments. ECO2 could help assess lung aeration and improve lung recruitment immediately after birth.