Cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in the GALAXY trial: effect of anaesthesia in deep brain stimulation.

BACKGROUND: This study aims: (1) To compare cognitive and psychiatric outcomes after bilateral awake versus asleep subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD). (2) To explore the occurrence of psychiatric diagnoses, cognitive impairment and quality of life after surgery in our whole sample. (3) To validate whether we can predict postoperative cognitive decline. METHODS: 110 patients with PD were randomised to receive awake (n=56) or asleep (n=54) STN DBS surgery. At baseline and 6-month follow-up, all patients underwent standardised assessments testing several cognitive domains, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life. RESULTS: There were no differences on neuropsychological composite scores and psychiatric symptoms between the groups, but we found small differences on individual tests and cognitive domains. The asleep group performed better on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test delayed memory test (f=4.2, p=0.04), while the awake group improved on the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test delayed memory test. (f=4.4, p=0.04). The Stroop III score was worse for the awake group (f=5.5, p=0.02). Worse scores were present for Stroop I (Stroop word card) (f=6.3, p=0.01), Stroop II (Stroop color card) (f=46.4, p<0.001), Stroop III (Stroop color-word card) (f=10.8, p=0.001) and Trailmaking B/A (f=4.5, p=0.04). Improvements were seen on quality of life: Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (f=24.8, p<0.001), and psychiatric scales: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (f=6.2, p=0.01), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (f=5.5, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the choice between awake and asleep STN DBS does not affect cognitive, mood and behavioural adverse effects, despite a minor difference in memory. STN DBS has a beneficial effect on quality of life, mood and anxiety symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5809.

Cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a matched controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is effective for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Post-operative cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may augment the effects of DBS, but previous results are conflicting. Here, we investigated whether CBT augments the effect of DBS for OCD. METHOD: Patients with and without CBT following DBS of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule were included. First, we analyzed Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores before, during and after CBT in all patients with CBT. Second, we matched patients with and without CBT based on clinical baseline variables and initial response to DBS and compared the course of Y-BOCS and HAM-D scores over the same timeframe. RESULTS: In total, 36 patients with and 16 patients without CBT were included. Average duration of CBT was 10.4 months (s.d. 6.4). In the 36 patients with CBT, Y-BOCS scores decreased on average by 3.8 points (14.8%) from start until end of CBT (p = 0.043). HAM-D scores did not decrease following CBT. Second, 10 patients with CBT were matched to 10 patients without CBT. In both groups, Y-BOCS scores decreased equally from start until end of CBT or over a similar timeframe (10% in CBT group v. 13.1% in no-CBT group, p = 0.741). CONCLUSIONS: Obsessive-compulsive symptoms decreased over time in patients with and without post-operative CBT. Therefore, further improvement may be attributed to late effects of DBS itself. The present study emphasizes the need for prospective randomized controlled studies, examining the effects of CBT.

Patients requesting and receiving euthanasia for psychiatric disorders in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) for patients with psychiatric disorders occupies a prominent place in the public debate, but little is known about the psychiatric patients requesting and receiving EAS. OBJECTIVE: To compare the social demographic and psychiatric profile of the patients who make a request for EAS and those who receive it. METHOD: We carried out a review of records from 1122 patients with psychiatric disorders who have filed a potentially eligible request for EAS at Expertise Centrum for Euthanasia (EE) in the period 2012-2018. FINDINGS: The majority of the patients requesting EAS were single females, living independently with a comorbid diagnosis of depression with a history of undergoing psychiatric treatment for more than 10 years. From the small number of patients who went on to receive EAS in our sample, the majority were also single women, with a diagnosis of depressive disorder. A small subgroup of patients whose diagnoses included somatic disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders and neurocognitive disorders were over-represented in the group of patients receiving EAS compared with the applicant group. CONCLUSION: The average demographic and psychiatric profile of patients requesting and receiving EAS were found to be broadly similar. The majority of patients requesting EAS had received a comorbid diagnosis, making this a difficult-to-treat patient group. Only a small number of patients requesting had their requests granted. Patients from different diagnostic groups showed patterns in why their requests were not granted. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Many of the patients who withdrew their requests for EAS benefited from being able to discuss dying with end of life experts at EE. Health professionals can make a difference to a vulnerable group of patients, if they are trained to discuss end of life.

Cyclic versus continuous deep brain stimulation in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) is effective for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but patients typically require high stimulation voltages and DBS comes with a risk for adverse events (AE). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to advance DBS for OCD by optimizing energy efficiency and minimize adverse events using a cyclic form of stimulation METHODS: This double blind, randomized crossover trial compares 2 weeks of continuous versus cyclic DBS (0.1 s ON, 0.2 s OFF) in 16 patients with OCD. We compared OCD symptoms (Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, Y-BOCS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), AEs, battery life, cognitive performance and quality of life. RESULTS: Average Y-BOCS scores at baseline increased significantly with 5.5 points (p = 0.006) in the cyclic condition. Average HAM-D and HAM-A scores increased with 2.2 (p = 0.088) and 2.8 points (p = 0.018). The overall health scale of quality of life worsened during cyclic DBS (p = 0.044). Patients reported on average 3.3 AEs during continuous stimulation and 4.4 AEs during cyclic stimulation (p = 0.175), though stimulation-related AEs such as headache and concentration problems reduced during cyclic DBS. Battery usage during continuous DBS was 0.021 V per hour compared to 0.008 V per hour during cyclic DBS. CONCLUSION: Though specific stimulation-related AEs improved, cyclic stimulation (0.1 s ON, 0.2 s OFF) comes with a high relapse risk in patients with DBS for OCD. Cyclic DBS is no alternative for standard DBS treatment, but applicable in case of debilitating AEs.

The relationship between cognitive functioning and psychopathology in patients with psychiatric disorders: a transdiagnostic network analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with psychiatric disorders often experience cognitive dysfunction, but the precise relationship between cognitive deficits and psychopathology remains unclear. We investigated the relationships between domains of cognitive functioning and psychopathology in a transdiagnostic sample using a data-driven approach. METHODS: Cross-sectional network analyses were conducted to investigate the relationships between domains of psychopathology and cognitive functioning and detect clusters in the network. This naturalistic transdiagnostic sample consists of 1016 psychiatric patients who have a variety of psychiatric diagnoses, such as depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, and schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders. Psychopathology symptoms were assessed using various questionnaires. Core cognitive domains were assessed with a battery of automated tests. RESULTS: Network analysis detected three clusters that we labelled: general psychopathology, substance use, and cognition. Depressive and anxiety symptoms, verbal memory, and visual attention were the most central nodes in the network. Most associations between cognitive functioning and symptoms were negative, i.e. increased symptom severity was associated with worse cognitive functioning. Cannabis use, (subclinical) psychotic experiences, and anhedonia had the strongest total negative relationships with cognitive variables. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive functioning and psychopathology are independent but related dimensions, which interact in a transdiagnostic manner. Depression, anxiety, verbal memory, and visual attention are especially relevant in this network and can be considered independent transdiagnostic targets for research and treatment in psychiatry. Moreover, future research on cognitive functioning in psychopathology should take a transdiagnostic approach, focusing on symptom-specific interactions with cognitive domains rather than investigating cognitive functioning within diagnostic categories.

The interplay between psychopathological symptoms: transdiagnostic cross-lagged panel network model.

BACKGROUND: Recent paradigm shifts suggest that psychopathology manifests through dynamic interactions between individual symptoms. AIMS: To investigate the longitudinal relationships between symptoms in a transdiagnostic sample of patients with psychiatric disorders. METHOD: A two-wave, cross-lagged panel network model of 15 nodes representing symptoms of depression, (social) anxiety and attenuated psychotic symptoms was estimated, using baseline and 1-year follow-up data of 222 individuals with psychiatric disorders. Centrality indices were calculated to determine important predictors and outcomes. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that the strongest relationships in the network were between (a) more suicidal ideation predicting more negative self-view, and (b) autoregressive relationships of social anxiety symptoms positively reinforcing themselves. Negative self-view was the most predictable node in the network as it had the highest 'in-expected influence' centrality, and may be an important transdiagnostic outcome symptom. CONCLUSIONS: The results give insight into longitudinal interactions between symptoms, which interact in ways that do not adhere to broader diagnostic categories. Our results suggest that self-view can also be a transdiagnostic outcome of psychopathology rather than just a predictor, as is normally posited, and may especially have an important relationship with suicidal ideation. Overall, our study demonstrates the dynamic complexity of psychopathology, and further supports the importance of investigating symptom interactions of different psychopathological dimensions over time and across disorders.

The Puzzle of Functional Recovery in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders-Replicating a Network Analysis Study.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Recovery from psychosis is a complex phenomenon determined by an array of variables mutually impacting each other in a manner that is not fully understood. The aim of this study is to perform an approximated replication of a previous network analysis study investigating how different clinical aspects-covering psychopathology, cognition, personal resources, functional capacity, and real-life functioning-are interrelated in the context of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. STUDY DESIGN: A sample of 843 subjects from a multisite cohort study, with the diagnosis of a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, was used to estimate a network comprising 27 variables. The connectivity and relative importance of the variables was examined through network analysis. We used a quantitative and qualitative approach to infer replication quality. STUDY RESULTS: Functional capacity and real-life functioning were central and bridged different domains of the network, in line with the replicated study. Neurocognition, interpersonal relationships, and avolition were also key elements of the network, in close relation to aspects of functioning. Despite significant methodological differences, the current study could substantially replicate previous findings. CONCLUSIONS: Results solidify the network analysis approach in the context of mental disorders and further inform future studies about key variables in the context of recovery from psychotic disorders.

Effectiveness and safety of deep brain stimulation for patients with refractory obsessive compulsive disorder and comorbid autism spectrum disorder; A case series.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is effective for patients with treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is present in up to a third of all patients with OCD, but it is unknown whether effectiveness of DBS for OCD also applies for patients with comorbid ASD. The present case series is the first to examine effectiveness on OCD symptoms and safety of DBS in patients with OCD and ASD specifically. METHODS: Six consecutive patients with treatment-refractory OCD and comorbid ASD received DBS of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) or medial forebrain bundle (MFB). We examined effectiveness of DBS on symptoms of OCD and depression with the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), respectively. We included qualitative data to describe the course of treatment in individual patients with OCD and ASD. RESULTS: We found that DBS significantly decreased symptoms of OCD (p < .001) and depression (p = .007). Four out of six patients with OCD and comorbid ASD were responders (decrease ≥ 35% in Y-BOCS), one patient was partial-responder (decrease 25-35% in Y-BOCS) and one patient did not respond (decrease ≤ 25% in Y-BOCS). Serious adverse events were an infection of the DBS system, and a suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: Though present results are preliminary, DBS reduced symptoms of OCD and depression in patients with OCD and comorbid ASD. Comorbid ASD should therefore not be seen as a contra-indication for DBS in OCD.

A Network of Psychopathological, Cognitive, and Motor Symptoms in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) are complex syndromes involving psychopathological, cognitive, and also motor symptoms as core features. A better understanding of how these symptoms mutually impact each other could translate into diagnostic, prognostic, and, eventually, treatment advancements. The present study aimed to: (1) estimate a network model of psychopathological, cognitive, and motor symptoms in SSD; (2) detect communities and explore the connectivity and relative importance of variables within the network; and (3) explore differences in subsample networks according to remission status. A sample of 1007 patients from a multisite cohort study was included in the analysis. We estimated a network of 43 nodes, including all the items from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, a cognitive assessment battery and clinical ratings of extrapyramidal symptoms. Methodologies specific to network analysis were employed to address the study's aims. The estimated network for the total sample was densely interconnected and organized into 7 communities. Nodes related to insight, abstraction capacity, attention, and suspiciousness were the main bridges between network communities. The estimated network for the subgroup of patients in remission showed a sparser density and a different structure compared to the network of nonremitted patients. In conclusion, the present study conveys a detailed characterization of the interrelations between a set of core clinical elements of SSD. These results provide potential novel clues for clinical assessment and intervention.

A comparison of depressive symptom profiles between current major depressive disorder and schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Depressive symptoms are highly prevalent and clinically relevant in schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) patients. So far, little is known about to what extent the depressive symptom profile in SSD is comparable to that seen in major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Data were derived from the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis study (GROUP) and the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). We examined differences in severity of depressive symptom profiles and distribution of mood/cognition and somatic/vegetative depressive symptoms using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (QIDS-SR) within SSD patients (n = 449), MDD patients (n = 816) and healthy controls (n = 417), aged 18 to 50. Within SSD, associations between depression severity and clinical and demographic data were examined. RESULTS: 60.4% of SSD patients showed substantial depressive symptomatology (QIDS-SR≥6). The difference in mood/cognition symptoms between SSD and MDD was larger (higher symptoms in MDD, effect size = 1.13), than the differences in somatic/vegetative symptoms (effect size 0.74). In patients with SSD, multivariable regression analyses showed that lower social functioning, male gender, use of benzodiazepine and more severe positive symptoms were associated with higher overall depressive symptomatology. The use of antipsychotics or antidepressants was associated with more somatic/vegetative symptoms. CONCLUSION: More than half of SSD patients have considerable depressive symptomatology, with a relative preponderance of somatic/vegetative symptoms compared to the profile seen in MDD. Future research could explore whether depressive symptom profile in SSD may also be associated with biological dysregulations like in MDD.

Deep brain stimulation versus ablative surgery for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Ablative surgery (ABL) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are last-resort treatment options for patients suffering from treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aim of this study was to conduct an updated meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of the ablative procedures capsulotomy and cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation. METHODS: We conducted a PubMed search to identify all clinical trials on capsulotomy, cingulotomy, and DBS. Random effects meta-analyses were performed on 38 articles with a primary focus on efficacy in reducing OCD symptoms as measured by a reduction in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score and the responder rate (≥35% reduction in Y-BOCS score). RESULTS: With responder rates of 48% and 53% after 12-16 months and 56% and 57% at last follow-up for ABL and DBS, respectively, and large effect sizes in the reduction in Y-BOCS scores, both surgical modalities show effectiveness in treating refractory OCD. Meta-regression did not show a statistically significant difference between ABL and DBS regarding these outcomes. Regarding adverse events, a statistically significant higher rate of impulsivity is reported in studies on DBS. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows equal efficacy of ABL and DBS in the treatment of refractory OCD. For now, the choice of intervention should, therefore, rely on factors such as risk of developing impulsivity, patient preferences, and experiences of psychiatrist and neurosurgeon. Future research should provide more insight regarding differences between ABL and DBS and response prediction following direct comparisons between the surgical modalities, to enable personalized and legitimate choices between ABL and DBS.

Measuring process indicators and adverse events to assess the quality of care for inpatients with psychosis.

BACKGROUND: Research into the quality of care in psychiatry is scarce. Data collection is falling behind that for other fields of medicine and therefore the opportunity to improve care is missed. AIMS: In this medical record study we aim to determine: (i) whether or not patients' physical health indicators are assessed and pharmacological and behavioural treatment interventions applied; (ii) the incidence and nature of adverse events in psychotic inpatients. METHODS: Medical records of inpatients with psychosis admitted to psychiatric wards at Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Department of psychiatry, were screened with a previously developed and tested two-step patient safety tool. RESULTS: Data of 299 admissions were included. Physical health indicators were not assessed in one-third of cases. Fifty-five percent of the patients were smokers but only 1% received an intervention. The family was actively involved in 43% of the cases. During 11,403 admission days, 235 adverse events had been recorded. The most frequent adverse event was adverse drug reactions (40%), which were mostly related to antipsychotic medication. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, quality of care auditing is useful to prioritize areas that need improvement. Future research should focus on interventions to improve the quality of psychiatric care.

Apathy Induced by Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Apathy, the loss of motivation, is a common problem in Parkinson's disease (PD) and often observed following deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the occurrence of apathy following STN DBS in literature. Relevant articles were searched in PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Sciences electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported apathy scores pre- and post-DBS or the cross-sectional difference between PD patients receiving STN DBS and patients receiving medication only. Thirty-three articles were included in the meta-analyses from 6,658 screened articles by two authors independently. A total of 1,286 patients were included with a mean age (±standard deviation [SD]) of 58.4 ± 8.5 years and a disease duration of 11.0 ± 5.8 years. The apathy score measured by means of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), Starkstein Apathy Scale (SAS), and the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) was significantly higher after DBS than pre-operatively (g = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19-0.48, P < 0.001). An equal, significant difference in severity of apathy was found between STN DBS and medication only (g = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.03-0.65; P = 0.004). Statistical heterogeneity was moderately high, but the effects stood strong after multiple analyses and were independent of tapering off dopaminergic medication. The findings of this meta-analysis indicate that apathy is increased after STN DBS compared to the pre-operative state and to medication only (systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42019133932). © 2020 Universiteit van Amsterdam. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Is deep brain stimulation effective and safe for patients with obsessive compulsive disorder and comorbid bipolar disorder?

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Bipolar disorder (BD) is generally considered a contra-indication for DBS due to frequently reported transient impulsivity or (hypo)mania. OBJECTIVE: The present study is the first study to examine effectiveness and safety of DBS for patients with OCD and BD. METHODS: Five consecutive patients suffering from treatment-refractory OCD with comorbid BD (I or II) underwent DBS of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC). We examined effectiveness of DBS on symptoms of OCD and depression, using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). We monitored side-effects, in particular DBS-induced (hypo)manic symptoms, using the Young mania rating scale (YMRS). RESULTS: Follow-up time ranged between 15 and 68 months. vALIC-DBS led to a significant improvement of OCD and depressive symptoms. Mean Y-BOCS score decreased from 36.8 (SD 2.4) to 22.4 (SD 9.4). Mean HAM-D score dropped from 24.2 (SD 8.6) to 16.5 (SD 11.3). Transient hypomanic symptoms were observed in 4 out of 5 patients and in 1 patient, hypomanic symptoms resolved by adjusting stimulation and medication. Changes in YMRS scores were not significant. Hypomanic symptoms did not result in admission or lasting adverse consequences. CONCLUSION: DBS effectively alleviates symptoms of OCD and depression in patients with OCD and BD but there is a large risk of developing transient hypomanic symptoms. Altogether, comorbid BD should not be considered as an absolute contra-indication for DBS in OCD patients with comorbid BD, but patients should be monitored carefully during optimization and follow-up of DBS.

Longitudinal evidence for a relation between depressive symptoms and quality of life in schizophrenia using structural equation modeling.

Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia often report a low quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether we could replicate a cross-sectional model by Alessandrini et al. (2016, n = 271) and whether this model predicts QoL later in life. This model showed strong associations between schizophrenia spectrum symptoms and depressive symptoms on QoL, but lacked follow-up assessment. This model was adapted in the current study and the robustness was investigated by using a longitudinal design in which the association between baseline variables (including IQ, depression, schizophrenia spectrum symptoms as well as social functioning) and QoL during 3-years of follow-up was investigated. We included patients with a non-affective psychotic disorder (n = 744) from a prospective naturalistic cohort-study. In the cross-sectional model, with good measure of fit, both depression as well as social functioning was associated with QoL (direct path coefficient -0.28 and 0.41, respectively). Additionally, the severity of schizophrenia spectrum symptoms was highly associated with social functioning (direct path coefficient -0.70). Importantly, the longitudinal model showed good measures of fit, which strengthens the validity of the initial model and highlights that depression prospectively affect QoL while schizophrenia spectrum symptoms prospectively influence QoL via social functioning. The negative, longitudinal impact of a depression on QoL highlights the need to focus on treatment of this co-morbidity.

Clozapine and Long-Term Mortality Risk in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Lasting 1.1-12.5 Years.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with schizophrenia have an elevated mortality risk compared to the general population, with cardiovascular-related deaths being the leading cause. The role of clozapine use in the long-term mortality risk is unclear. While clozapine treatment may increase the risk for cardiovascular mortality, it may have protective effects regarding suicidal behavior. METHODS: We systematically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO and reviewed studies that used a long-term follow-up (ie, >52 weeks) and reported on mortality in adults diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders who had received clozapine treatment. RESULTS: Altogether, 24 studies reported on 1327 deaths from any causes during 217691 patient years in patients treated with clozapine. The unadjusted mortality rate in 22 unique samples during a follow-up of 1.1-12.5 (median = 5.4) years was 6.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.4-7.9) per 1000 patient years. Long-term, crude mortality rate ratios were not significantly lower in patients ever treated with clozapine during follow-up, but significantly lower in patients continuously treated with clozapine compared to patients with other antipsychotics (mortality rate ratio = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.36-0.85, P-value = .007). Few studies reported on rates of long-term cause-specific mortality (suicide and ischemic heart disease), which showed no significant difference in patients using clozapine compared to patients using other antipsychotics. Statistical heterogeneity was high in all analyses. DISCUSSION: Continuous clozapine treatment in schizophrenia patients was associated with a significantly lower long-term all-cause mortality rate compared to other antipsychotic use. These findings, combined with the known efficacy of clozapine, give reason to re-evaluate the hesitancy to prescribe clozapine in regular care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017069390.

Treating depressive episodes or symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.

Depressive episodes or symptoms occur frequently in patients with schizophrenia and may have far-reaching consequences. Despite the high prevalence rate and clinical relevance of this comorbidity, knowledge about treatment options is still limited. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the literature concerning treatment options for depressive episodes or symptoms in schizophrenia. Based on the current evidence, we present a stepwise treatment approach. The first step is to evaluate the current antipsychotic treatment of psychotic symptoms and consider lowering the dosage, since increased blockade of the dopamine D2 receptors may be associated with a worse subjective sense of well-being and dysphoria. A second step is to consider switching antipsychotics, since there are indications that some antipsychotics (including sulpiride, clozapine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, quetiapine, lurasidone, or amisulpride) are slightly more effective in reducing depressive symptoms compared to other antipsychotics or placebo. In the case of a persistent depressive episode, additional therapeutic interventions are indicated. However, the evidence is indecisive regarding the treatment of choice: either starting cognitive-behavioral therapy or adding an antidepressant. A limited number of studies examined the use of antidepressants in depressed patients with schizophrenia showing modest effectiveness. Overall, additional research is needed to determine the most effective treatment approach for patients with schizophrenia and depressive episodes.