Cardiorespiratory fitness in persons with lower limb amputation.

The aim of this study is to gain insight in the cardiorespiratory fitness of persons with lower limb amputation (LLA) during rehabilitation, and in potential factors influencing their cardiorespiratory fitness. We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from cardiopulmonary exercise tests. Included participants were adults with LLA. Main outcome was cardiorespiratory fitness expressed as O 2 peak (ml/min/kg) and was directly determined using breath-by-breath gas analysis. O 2 peak was compared to reference values for able-bodied controls. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to investigate potential factors related to O 2 peak in persons with LLA. Potential factors were age, BMI adjusted, gender, level of amputation, aetiology of amputation, unilateral/bilateral, type of ergometry and use of beta blockers. Data of 74 participants with LLA are presented; 84% male (n = 62), mean age 58.9 (SD 11.6), mean BMI 26.7 (SD 5.6), 44 participants have a LLA above the knee, 30 below the knee. Overall O 2 peak was lower in persons with LLA compared to reference values for able-bodied controls, with mean O 2 peak for the total LLA group of 14.6 ±â€…4.1 ml/kg/min. In the multivariate regression analysis, only age was a significant predictor for lower O 2 peak (regression coefficient: -0.15, 95% CI [0.23-0.069], r 2  = 0.166). These results indicate that the cardiorespiratory fitness in persons with LLA is low, while they actually need more energy to walk and perform other daily activities. Cardiorespiratory fitness is not closely associated with the analysed demographic or clinical factors and will have to be determined on an individual basis for use in daily practice.

The most important activities of daily functioning: the opinion of persons with lower limb amputation and healthcare professionals differ considerably.

The aim of this study is to determine the 15 most important daily activities according to persons with lower limb amputation (LLA) and healthcare professionals. Persons with LLA (n = 125) and healthcare professionals (n = 44) filled in a questionnaire. Participants had to select 10 items out of a list of 40 items on the domains activity and/or participation. Selection criterion was what they considered to be most important to perform independently and order the selected 10 items from most to least important. Mean rank scores of the 15 highest scored items according to participants with LLA were compared with the mean rank scores given by professionals, using the Mann-Whitney U test with a Hochberg adjustment for multiple testing. Participants with LLA rated five activities as significantly more important compared to professionals: 'driving a car', 'bicycling', 'ascending/descending stairs', 'heavy exercise', and 'preparing meals'. Healthcare professionals rated four activities as significantly more important compared to persons with LLA: 'going to the toilet', 'getting in and out bed', 'walking around outdoors', and 'walking around indoors'. A significant difference in rating importance was present in 9 out of 15 activities between persons with LLA and healthcare professionals. This result makes it all the more clear how complex shared decision making can be and how important it is for healthcare professionals to communicate with the person with LLA.

Metabolic costs of activities of daily living in persons with a lower limb amputation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on the metabolic costs of activities of daily living (ADL) in persons with a lower limb amputation (LLA). DATA SOURCES: A literature search was undertaken in the Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO databases using keywords and synonyms for LLA, metabolic costs, and ADL. The last search was performed on November 29th, 2017. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they met the following 2 criteria: participants were adults with a (unilateral or bilateral) LLA and metabolic costs were measured while participants performed a physical activity or ADL. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data of 1,912 participants from 61 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies used different terms to describe metabolic costs. Participants were recruited in different settings, relatively healthy, with few comorbidities. Limited data were available on metabolic costs of other activities than walking with a prosthesis. A linear mixed model analysis was performed based on the means reported, with study as unit of analysis and test results of different groups and measurement conditions as repeated measures within the unit of analysis. Predictors entered in the analysis were e.g. level and reason of amputation, age, weight, and height. During walking, oxygen consumption (ml O2/kg/min) and heart rate (beats/min) increased with a higher walking speed and a more proximal amputation. Additionally, oxygen consumption was determined by the interaction terms walking speed x amputation level and walking speed squared. Heart rate was determined by the interaction term walking speed squared. CONCLUSION: During walking, oxygen consumption (ml O2/kg/min) and heart rate (beats/min) increased with a higher walking speed and a more proximal amputation. Data on metabolic costs of other activities were limited. The poor quality of the studies and the relatively healthy participants limited generalizability of the results of the meta-analysis.