ABSTRACT
Model adherence is a key indicator of mental health care quality. This study investigates the degree of model adherence, as well as content and staging of care, among the first Youth Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams in the Netherlands. Model fidelity was assessed in sixteen teams with the Youth Flexile ACT model fidelity scale (2014 version). Mental health workers completed a 'content of care questionnaire' to map the interventions applied in the teams. Model fidelity scores revealed that twelve teams adhered to the Youth Flexible ACT standard with 'optimal implementation' (≥ 4.1 on a 5 point scale) and four teams with 'adequate implementation'. Most disciplines were well integrated within the teams; however, several items regarding the involvement of specific disciplines and the availability of treatment interventions (peer support worker, employment and education specialist and programs, family interventions, integrated dual disorder treatment) scored below the optimum. Frequency of contact during ACT and the use of Routine Outcome Monitoring instruments scored below the optimum as well. The 'content of care' data showed that most clients received an individual psychological intervention, and nearly half of the client sample received scaled-up / intensified ACT care. The findings indicate a predominantly successful translation of care from the theoretical Flexible ACT framework into practice, covering both ACT and non-ACT functions. Further room for improvement lies in the incorporation of specialized disciplines in the personal and social recovery domains, including the peer support worker and employment and education specialist, as well as in specific protocolled interventions.
Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services , Mental Disorders , Humans , Netherlands , Adolescent , Community Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Mental Disorders/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Male , Female , Guideline AdherenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Deinstitutionalization in mental health care has been an ongoing process for decades. More and more people with severe mental illness (SMI), who previously lived in residential supported housing settings and were formerly homeless, are now living independently in the community but need intensive support to enable independent living. The support provided by regular outpatient teams is inadequate for this target group. This study explored the ingredients for an alternative form of outpatient support: intensive home support (IHS). METHODS: Concept mapping was used, following five steps: (1) brainstorming, (2) sorting, (3) rating, (4) statistical analysis & visual representation, and (5) interpretation. Purposive sampling was used to represent several perspectives, including researchers, professionals, peer workers, and policy makers. RESULTS: Experts (n = 17) participated in the brainstorming step and the sorting and rating steps (n = 14). The 84 generated statements were grouped into 10 clusters:. (1) housing rights; (2) informal collaboration; (3) reciprocity in the community; (4) normalization and citizenship; (5) recovery; (6) sustainable funding; (7) equivalence; (8) flexible, proactive 24/7 support; (9) public health and positive health; and (10) integrated cooperation in support at home. CONCLUSIONS: Given the diversity of the ingredients contained in the clusters, it seems that IHS should be designed according to a holistic approach in collaboration with several sectors. Additionally, IHS is not only the responsibility of care organizations but also the responsibility of national and local governments. Further research about collaboration and integrated care is needed to determine how to implement all of the ingredients in practice.
Subject(s)
Ill-Housed Persons , Mental Disorders , Humans , Independent Living , Mental Disorders/therapy , Outpatients , Peer GroupABSTRACT
Background: For the last four decades, there has been a shift in mental healthcare toward more rehabilitation and following a more humanistic and comprehensive vision on recovery for persons with severe mental illness (SMI). Consequently, many community-based mental healthcare programs and services have been developed internationally. Currently, community mental healthcare is still under development, with a focus on further inclusion of persons with enduring mental health problems. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of existing and upcoming community mental healthcare approaches to discover the current vision on the ingredients of community mental healthcare. Methods: We conducted a scoping review by systematically searching four databases, supplemented with the results of Research Rabbit, a hand-search in reference lists and 10 volumes of two leading journals. We included studies on adults with SMI focusing on stimulating independent living, integrated care, recovery, and social inclusion published in English between January 2011 and December 2022 in peer-reviewed journals. Results: The search resulted in 56 papers that met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis revealed ingredients in 12 areas: multidisciplinary teams; collaboration within and outside the organization; attention to several aspects of health; supporting full citizenship; attention to the recovery of daily life; collaboration with the social network; tailored support; well-trained staff; using digital technologies; housing and living environment; sustainable policies and funding; and reciprocity in relationships. Conclusion: We found 12 areas of ingredients, including some innovative topics about reciprocity and sustainable policies and funding. There is much attention to individual ingredients for good community-based mental healthcare, but very little is known about their integration and implementation in contemporary, fragmented mental healthcare services. For future studies, we recommend more empirical research on community mental healthcare, as well as further investigation(s) from the social service perspective, and solid research on general terminology about SMI and outpatient support.
ABSTRACT
This article draws on a prospective longitudinal study in which Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model fidelity and patient outcomes were assessed in twenty outpatient treatment teams. 530 severely mentally ill patients participated in the study. Delinquency outcomes were assessed three times during a two-year follow-up period. At baseline, 49% of the patients had a recent criminal history, meaning that they had at least one reported contact with the police and/or the justice system in the past year. Patients with a recent criminal history had more serious psychosocial problems at baseline compared to those without a recent criminal history. Delinquency outcomes showed improvement over time, but this was not associated with ACT model fidelity. The study shows an association for homelessness and criminal activity. The persistent criminal activities of some of the patients showed that for this group extra interventions are needed that specifically target reduction of criminal behavior.
Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services , Crime/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Community Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Crime/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Netherlands , Program Evaluation , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Whereas in the U.S. and Canada the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model has proven to be highly effective in enhancing employment perspectives for persons with severe mental illnesses, the evidence base is less abundant in countries with a different socioeconomic climate. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of IPS in the Dutch socioeconomic context. METHOD: A multisite randomized controlled trial was performed following 151 persons with severe mental illnesses expressing an explicit wish for regular employment, comparing IPS with traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR). Primary outcome was the proportion of persons who were competitively employed over a period of 30 months. Secondary outcomes were self-reported quality of life, self-esteem and mental health. Additionally, the impact of being engaged in competitive employment on these secondary outcomes was examined. RESULTS: In 30 months, 44% of IPS participants found competitive work, compared with 25% of participants supported by TVR. No direct effect of IPS on mental health, self-esteem or quality of life was found. Being competitively employed before follow-up measurements was significantly associated with an increase in mental health, self-esteem and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study strongly confirms that IPS is an effective method in helping people with severe mental illnesses find competitive work also in countries characterized by a relatively protective socioeconomic climate putting up unintended barriers to employment. The implementation of IPS on a larger scale seems warranted, and new studies are needed on the mechanisms through which IPS works.
Subject(s)
Employment, Supported , Mental Disorders/rehabilitation , Adult , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Employment, Supported/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/psychology , Netherlands , Program Evaluation , Quality of Life/psychology , Rehabilitation, Vocational/methods , Self ConceptABSTRACT
This study examined the associations between substance abuse problems in severely mentally ill patients, outcome and Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model fidelity. In a prospective longitudinal study, ACT model fidelity and patient outcomes were assessed in 20 outpatient treatment teams using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, Camberwell Assessment of Needs short appraisal schedule and measures of service use. Five hundred and thirty severely mentally ill patients participated in the study. Substance abuse problems were assessed three times during a 2-year follow-up period. This study found that among patients with severe mental illness, patients with an addiction problem had more serious psychosocial problems at baseline. Substance abuse problems showed improvement over time, but this was not associated with ACT model fidelity. The study indicates that investment by teams to improve a patient's psychosocial situation can lead to improvements on substance problems.
Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Adult , Community Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/therapy , Netherlands/epidemiology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether employing mental health consumers as consumer-providers in assertive community treatment teams can enhance outcomes for clients with severe mental illness. METHODS: In a prospective longitudinal study, presence of consumer-providers and outcomes of 530 clients with severe mental illness in 20 outpatient teams were assessed at baseline and at one-year and two-year follow-ups. Measures included the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS), the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Assessment Schedule (CANSAS), the Working Alliance Scale, the number of hospital days, and the number of days of homelessness. Multilevel regression was used with the independent variables consumer-provider presence, time of measurement, and their interaction. RESULTS: A positive association was found between consumer-provider presence and improvements in functioning on the HoNOS (p = .020), met needs in relation to personal recovery (p=.044), unmet needs in relation to personal recovery (p = .008), and number of homeless days (p<.001). A negative association was found for consumer-provider presence and the number of hospital days (p = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Consumer-providers are important participants in outpatient teams serving clients with severe mental illnesses, although integrating these providers as part of a team is a slow process.
Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Mental Disorders/rehabilitation , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Participation , Adult , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Ill-Housed Persons/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Multilevel Analysis , Netherlands , Peer Group , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: This study examined the quality of mental health care for people with schizophrenia in eight regions in The Netherlands as assessed by the QUARTS: Quality Assessment of Regional Treatment Systems for Schizophrenia. The focus was on determining whether the introduction of multidisciplinary guidelines improved quality in service provision. METHODS: The QUARTS, a standardized interview instrument, addresses the availability of and satisfaction with services from the perspectives of clinicians, patients, families, and community organizations. The first QUARTS assessment was done about the time the guidelines were introduced in The Netherlands (2005), and the second was two to four years later. RESULTS: In all regions progress was made in the availability of care elements, although progress was limited for evidence-based rehabilitation interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Key clinicians in all regions perceived the guidelines as an important factor in improving the quality of schizophrenia care. QUARTS can be a helpful instrument for service monitoring and development.
Subject(s)
Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Schizophrenia/rehabilitation , Humans , Interviews as Topic , NetherlandsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The implementation of assertive community treatment (ACT) varies widely. To date, the association between model fidelity and effect has not been investigated in Europe. We investigated the association between model fidelity and outcome in the Dutch mental health system. METHOD: In a prospective longitudinal study, ACT model fidelity and patient outcomes were assessed in 20 outpatient treatment teams. Patients with severe mental illness (n = 530) participated in the study. Outcomes were assessed 3 times using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS), the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Assessment Schedule (CANSAS), and the number of hospital days and homeless days during a 2-year follow-up period. Data were analyzed using multilevel statistics. RESULTS: High ACT model fidelity was associated with better outcomes on the HoNOS and less homeless days. Among all of the ACT ingredients, team structure was associated with better outcomes. No associations were found between ACT model fidelity, number of hospital days, and CANSAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence supports the importance of model fidelity for improving patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services , Guideline Adherence , Schizophrenia/therapy , Adult , Evidence-Based Practice , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Mental Status Schedule , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Prospective Studies , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This brief report addresses the systematic implementation of skills training modules for persons with schizophrenia or related disorders in three Dutch mental health agencies. METHODS: Information on barriers, strategies and integration into routine daily practice was gathered at 0, 12 and 24 months through interviews with managers, program leaders, trainers, practitioners and clients. RESULTS: Overall implementation of the skills training modules for 74% of the persons with schizophrenia or related disorders was not feasible. Implementation was impeded by an incapable program leader, organizational changes, disappointing referrals and loss of trainers. The agencies made important steps forward to integrate the modules into routine daily practice. CONCLUSIONS: A reach percentage of 74% in two years time is too ambitious and needs to be adjusted. Systematic integration of the modules into routine daily practice is feasible, but requires solid program management and continuous effort to involve clients and practitioners.