Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 141(3): 230-40, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16926543

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Assessment of allergenicity of foods is important for allergic consumers and regulators. Immunoassays to measure major food allergens are widely applied, often giving variable results. Using the major apple allergen Mal d 1 as a model, we aimed to establish at the molecular level why different immunoassays for assessing allergenicity of apple cultivars produce conflicting outcomes. METHODS: Mal d 1 was measured in 53 cultivars from Italy and 35 from The Netherlands, using four different immunoassays. Purified Mal d 1 standards were molecularly characterized by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) and mass spectrometry (MS). RESULTS: Three immunoassays using an identical standard gave similar results. Minor differences in sample preparation already resulted in significant loss of allergenicity. The fourth assay, using a different Mal d 1 standard, gave 10- to 100-fold lower outcomes. By SEC, this standard was shown to be almost fully aggregated. This aggregation was accompanied by a decrease of the mass of the Mal d 1 molecule by approximately 1 kDa as analyzed by MS. The deviating immunoassay was shown to selectively recognize this aggregated form of Mal d 1, whereas the other three assays, including the one based on IgE antibody recognition, preferentially bound non-aggregated allergen. CONCLUSIONS: Variable and poorly controllable major allergen modification in both extracts and standards hamper accurate allergenicity assessments of fruits.


Subject(s)
Allergens/analysis , Fruit/chemistry , Fruit/immunology , Malus , Plant Proteins/analysis , Plant Proteins/standards , Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Plant , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Immunoassay/standards , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Plant Extracts/immunology , Species Specificity
2.
Theor Appl Genet ; 110(4): 660-8, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15647920

ABSTRACT

We used a new method called nucleotide-binding site (NBS) profiling to identify and map resistance gene analogues (RGAs) in apple. This method simultaneously allows the amplification and the mapping of genetic markers anchored in the conserved NBS-encoding domain of plant disease resistance genes. Ninety-four individuals belonging to an F1 progeny derived from a cross between the apple cultivars 'Discovery' and 'TN10-8' were studied. Two degenerate primers designed from the highly conserved P-loop motif within the NBS domain were used together with adapter primers. Forty-three markers generated with NBS profiling could be mapped in this progeny. After sequencing, 23 markers were identified as RGAs, based on their homologies with known resistance genes or NBS/leucine-rich-repeat-like genes. Markers were mapped on 10 of the 17 linkage groups of the apple genetic map used. Most of these markers were organized in clusters. Twenty-five markers mapped close to major genes or quantitative trait loci for resistance to scab and mildew previously identified in different apple progenies. Several markers could become efficient tools for marker-assisted selection once converted into breeder-friendly markers. This study demonstrates the efficiency of the NBS-profiling method for generating RGA markers for resistance loci in apple.


Subject(s)
Genes, Plant , Malus/genetics , Plant Diseases/genetics , Quantitative Trait Loci , Amino Acid Sequence , Chromosome Mapping , Chromosomes, Plant , Genetic Markers , Genome, Plant , Molecular Sequence Data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL