The RISE study protocol: resilience impacted by positive stressful events for people with cystic fibrosis.

Introduction: For people with cystic fibrosis (CF), gaining access to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) therapy, a new modulator drug combination, is perceived as a positive life event. ETI leads to a strong improvement of disease symptoms. However, some people with CF experience a deterioration in mental wellbeing after starting ETI therapy. The primary objective of this study is to investigate if and in which direction mental wellbeing of people with CF changes after starting ETI therapy. Our secondary objectives include, among others, investigation of underlying biological and psychosocial factors associated with a change in mental wellbeing of people with CF after starting ETI therapy. Methods and analysis: The Resilience lmpacted by Positive Stressful Events (RISE) study is a single-arm, observational, prospective longitudinal cohort. It has a timeframe of 60 weeks: 12 weeks before, 12 weeks after, 24 weeks after and 48 weeks after the start of ETI therapy. The primary outcome is mental well-being, measured at each of these four time points. Patients aged ≥12 years at the University Medical Center Utrecht qualifying for ETI therapy based on their CF mutation are eligible. Data will be analysed using a covariance pattern model with a general variance covariance matrix. Ethics: The RISE study was classified by the institutional review board as exempt from the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. Informed consent was obtained by both the children (12-16 years) and their caregivers, or only provided by the participants themselves when aged ≥16 years.

Defining and Measuring Resilience in Children with a Chronic Disease: a Scoping Review.

More than 25% of all children grow up with a chronic disease. They are at higher risk for developmental and psychosocial problems. However, children who function resiliently manage to adapt positively to these challenges. We aim to systematically review how resilience is defined and measured in children with a chronic disease. A search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and PsycINFO was performed on December 9, 2022, using resilience, disease, and child/adolescent as search terms. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion according to predefined criteria. Extraction domains included study characteristics, definition, and instruments assessing resilience outcomes, and resilience factors. Fifty-five out of 8766 articles were identified as relevant. In general, resilience was characterized as positive adaptation to adversity. The included studies assessed resilience by the outcomes of positive adaptation, or by resilience factors, or both. We categorized the assessed resilience outcomes into three groups: personal traits, psychosocial functioning, and disease-related outcomes. Moreover, myriad of resilience factors were measured, which were grouped into internal resilience factors (cognitive, social, and emotional competence factors), disease-related factors, and external factors (caregiver factors, social factors, and contextual factors). Our scoping review provides insight into the definitions and instruments used to measure resilience in children with a chronic disease. More knowledge is needed on which resilience factors are related to positive adaptation in specific illness-related challenges, which underlying mechanisms are responsible for this positive adaptation, and how these underlying mechanisms interact with one another. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42844-023-00092-2.

Development of the My Positive Health dialogue tool for children: a qualitative study on children's views of health.

BACKGROUND: Children's views of health were explored in order to develop a health dialogue tool for children. METHODS: A qualitative research design was used as part of a codesign process. Based on semi-structured interviews with both healthy children and children with a chronic condition (aged 8-18). Two approaches were applied. The first was an open exploration of children's views on health, which was then thematically analysed. Subsequently, a framework was used, based on the six-dimensional My Positive Health (MPH) dialogue tool for adults, to guide the second part of the interviews, focusing on reviewing the children's view on health within the context of the framework. For the final draft of the dialogue tool, a framework analysis was conducted and then validated by members of the 'children's council' of the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital. RESULTS: We interviewed 65 children, 45 of whom had a chronic condition and 20 were healthy. The children described a broad concept of health with the central themes of 'feeling good about yourself' and 'being able to participate'. Based on the subsequent framework analysis, the wording of two of the six dimensions of the MPH dialogue tool was adjusted and the related aspects were adapted for better alignment with the children's concept of health. After these modifications, the tool fully matched the children's concept of health. CONCLUSION: The MPH dialogue tool for children was developed for children with and without a chronic condition, to help them open up about what they consider important for their health and well-being, and to improve directorship over decisions and actions that would affect their health. The MPH dialogue tool aims to support healthcare professionals in providing the type of care and treatment that is in line with the needs of their young patients/clients.

Tracking Mental Wellbeing of Dutch Adolescents During the First Year of the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Longitudinal Study.

PURPOSE: Adolescents might be susceptible to the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown. We assessed changes in mental wellbeing throughout the first year of the pandemic and compared these with prepandemic levels. METHODS: This five-wave prospective study among Dutch adolescents aged 12-17 years used data collected before the pandemic (n = 224) (T0), in May (T1), July (T2), and October 2020 (T3), and in February 2021 (T4). Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association between stringency of the lockdown with mental wellbeing. RESULTS: Adolescents had a lower life satisfaction during the first full lockdown (T1) [adjusted ß: -0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.58 to -0.13], during the partial lockdown (T3) (adjusted ß: -0.37, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.12), and during the second full lockdown (T4) (adjusted ß: -0.79, 95% CI: -1.07 to -0.52) compared to before the pandemic (T0). Adolescents reported more internalizing symptoms during only the second full lockdown (T4) (adjusted ß: 2.58, 95% CI: 0.41-4.75). During the pandemic [at T1 (adjusted ß: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.20-0.38), T2 (adjusted ß: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.46), T3 (adjusted ß: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.22-0.45), and T4 (adjusted ß: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.07-0.34)], adolescents reported a better psychosomatic health, partly attributable to less trouble falling asleep (p < .01). DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 lockdown measures have had both a negative and positive impact on mental wellbeing of Dutch adolescents. However, mental wellbeing was most impacted during the second full lockdown compared to before the pandemic.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Mental Wellbeing in Children with a Chronic Condition Compared to Healthy Peers.

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental wellbeing of children 8-18 years old with chronic conditions, by comparing pandemic data with pre-pandemic data and with healthy peers. Data were obtained from two ongoing longitudinal cohorts: the PROactive cohort study following children with a chronic condition, and the WHISTLER population cohort. Mental wellbeing was assessed by three indicators: life satisfaction, internalising symptoms, and psychosomatic health. The stringency of the COVID-19-related lockdown was considered a moderating factor. Data on chronic patients were recorded before (n = 934, 65% girls) and during (n = 503, 61% girls) the pandemic, and compared to healthy peers during the pandemic (n = 166, 61% girls). Children with a chronic condition reported lower life satisfaction, but no clinically relevant changes in internalising symptoms or psychosomatic health, during the pandemic compared to before. In comparison to healthy peers, children with a chronic condition experienced decreased life satisfaction and psychosomatic health, but internalising symptoms did not differ between groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. The lockdown stringency was negatively associated with all indicators of mental wellbeing-worse life satisfaction, more internalising symptoms, and more psychosomatic symptoms.

Gender-Specific Changes in Life Satisfaction After the COVID-19-Related Lockdown in Dutch Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to assess whether mental well-being has changed after introduction of the lockdown measures compared with that before, whether this change differs between boys and girls, and whether this change is associated with COVID-19-related concerns. METHODS: This is a two-wave prospective study among Dutch adolescents using data collected up to one year before the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 224) and 5-8 weeks after the first introduction of lockdown measures (n = 158). Mental well-being was assessed by three indicators: life satisfaction, internalizing symptoms, and psychosomatic health. General linear model repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess whether mental well-being has changed and if this differed by sex. Univariate linear regressions were used to assess associations between COVID-19-related concerns and a change in mental well-being. RESULTS: Life satisfaction decreased (η2p = .079, p < .001), but no change in internalizing symptoms was observed (η2p = .014, p = .14), and psychosomatic health increased (η2p = .194, p < .001) after the introduction of lockdown measures. Boys scored significantly better on all mental health indicators compared with girls at baseline and follow-up. However, boys' life satisfaction significantly decreased at the follow-up (η2p = .038, p = .015), whereas girls' life satisfaction did not change. Concerns about COVID-19 were significantly associated with a lower life satisfaction and more internalizing symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents', especially boys', life satisfaction decreased during the lockdown. They reported no change in internalizing symptoms and an improved psychosomatic health. Adolescents' mental well-being is expected to vary during the COVID-19 pandemic and should continue to be monitored.

Mental Well-being and General Health in Adolescents with Asthma: The Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy Birth Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether adolescents with asthma experience a lower mental well-being and lower general health than their peers without asthma. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy study were used. At the ages of 11, 14, 17, and 20 years, 2651, 2522, 2094, and 2206 participants, respectively, completed questionnaires. Their parents completed questionnaires at the ages of 11 (n = 2660), 14 (n = 2338), and 17 years (n = 1872). Asthma was defined according to the Mechanisms of the Development of Allergy criteria. Mental well-being was measured using the Mental Health Index-5 and was reported by the adolescents. General health, measured on a 4-point Likert scale, was reported by the adolescents and their parents. We estimated associations of asthma with mental well-being and perceived general health using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: At ages 11, 14, 17, and 20 years, 6.7%, 6.9%, 5.0%, and 6.6%, respectively, of the adolescents had asthma. Adolescents with asthma did not score differently on the Mental Health Index than their peers without asthma. Adolescents with asthma were less likely to experience good or excellent health than their peers without asthma (aOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.26-0.51 for intermittent asthma and 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25-0.41 for persistent asthma). These results remain similar across the different ages. CONCLUSIONS: The mental well-being of adolescents with asthma is similar to that of their peers without asthma, although adolescents with asthma are less likely to perceive a good or excellent general health.