Pre-fracture medication use as a predictor of 30-day mortality in hip fracture patients: an analysis of 141,201 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive value of pre-fracture medication usage on 30-day mortality following a hip fracture. METHODS: Information on age, sex, fracture type, time of death and Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI) was collected from the Danish National Patient Registry on all patients above 60 years, sustaining a hip fracture during the period January 1995 to December 2013. Information on drug usage was obtained from the Danish National Prescription Database. Hazard ratios were calculated with 30-day mortality as the outcome. A univariate and 3 multivariate analyses were conducted with increasing adjustments, starting with age, sex and fracture type, adding co-morbidity and dose in the latter. RESULTS: 141,201 patients were included and a total of 12 drugs/drug groups were identified for analysis. Increased mortality was evident in all analyses for antiarrhythmics, beta blockers, proton pump inhibitors, loop diuretics, opioids, acetaminophen and for psycholeptics. For ACE-inhibitors, increased mortality was found in all analyses, except after adjustment for co-morbidity and dose. For thiazide diuretics, a significantly reduced mortality was evident in all but the univariate analyses while NSAIDs and statins were associated with a significantly reduced mortality in all analyses. For calcium channel blockers, an insignificant decrease was found after adjustment for dose. Further analysis showed a dose-response relationship for all drugs except ACE-inhibitors and calcium channel blockers. CONCLUSION: The study shows a correlation between pre-fracture usage of certain drugs and 30 day mortality after a hip fracture.

Orthogeriatric Service Reduces Mortality in Patients With Hip Fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Orthogeriatric service has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with hip fracture. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of orthogeriatrics at Bispebjerg University Hospital, Denmark. The primary outcome is mortality inhospital and after 1, 3, and 12 months for patients with hip fracture. The secondary outcome is mortality for home dwellers and nursing home inhabitants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective clinical cohort study with an historic control group including all patients with hip fracture admitted from 2007 to 2011. Patients with hip fracture are registered in a local database, and data are retrieved retrospectively using the Danish Civil Registration Number. RESULTS: We included 993 patients in the intervention group and 989 patients in the control group. A univariate analysis showed only significantly decreased mortality inhospital 6.3% vs 3.1% (P = .009) after orthogeriatrics. However, when adjusting for age, gender, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score in a multivariate analysis, including all patients with hip fracture, we find significantly reduced mortality inhospital (odds ratio [OR] 0.35), after 30 [OR 0.66] and 90 days [OR 0.72] and 1 year [OR 0.79]). When using a univariate analysis for home-dwelling patients, we found significantly reduced mortality inhospital (8.3-2.0%, P < .0001), after 30 days (12.2-6.8%, P = .004) and 90 days (20.5-13.0%, P = .002). One-year mortality was not significant. Patients from nursing homes had no significant decreasing mortality at any point of time in the univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: We have shown significant decreases for inhospital, 30 day, 90 day, and 1-year mortality after implementation of orthogeriatric service at Bispebjerg Hospital when adjusting for age, gender, and ASA score. Future trials should include frail patients with other fracture types who can benefit from orthogeriatrics.

Opioids in hip fracture patients: an analysis of mortality and post hospital opioid use.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of opioids among hip fracture patients, and the potential relation between perioperative prescription of opioids, mortality and chronic opioid use. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of opioids among hip fracture patients postoperatively and 90- and 180 days after discharge. The study also analysed predictors of early death at 30-, 90 and 365 days after discharge. METHODS: We present data from the Orthopaedic Department at Bispebjerg University Hospital from 30 May 2010 and 31 March 2011 on 416 consecutively admitted hip fracture patients. Three patients died before surgery and were excluded from the analyses. Data were collected through medical records, hospital and national databases. Medication use was analysed before admission, at 3 and 6 months. Mortality data were analysed at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year. RESULTS: 24% were opioid users at admission, of whom 13% had an active malignant disease and 20% had been diagnosed with osteoporosis. 95% received opioids during admission, and 81% received a prescription for opioids at discharge. This fraction decreased to 36% at 3 months and 30% at 6 months. 2.9% of previous opioid naïve patients remained users at 6 months. Opioid use prior to admission and a pre-existing diagnosis of osteoporosis were the most significant factors associated with continued use at 3 and 6 months. The 30-day mortality was 10% and 1-year mortality was 27%. Mortality was associated with high age, ASA score>2, active cancer, high creatinine and leucocytosis. We found no association between opioids and mortality. CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate no general reason to refrain from prescribing opioids to hip fracture patients based on a fear of potential abuse or increased mortality.

Metaanalysis of risk factors for mortality in patients with hip fracture.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the association of three different clinical score systems with the mortality in hip fracture patients. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on November 13, 2011 using PubMed and Embase. The search yielded 315 publications which were reviewed on the basis of the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included for further processing. The following clinical score systems were found to be of prognostic value for mortality in hip fracture patients: a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of three or above (odds ratio (OR): 3.07; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.78-3.38; p < 0.00001, 15,625 study participants included), a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score of one or more (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.79-2.34; p < 0.00001, 13,570 study participants included) and dementia (assessed with Mini Mental State Examination or obtained from journal extraction) (OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.64-4.57; p = 0.0001; 1,782 study participants included). CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis showed that the ASA score, the CCI score and assessment of preexisting dementia are useful in predicting the mortality of hip fracture patients.

[Collaboration between geriatricians and orthopaedic surgeons on elderly patients]. / Samarbejde mellem geriatri og ortopædkirurgi hos ældre patienter.

Close collaboration between geriatricians and orthopaedic surgeons on elderly patients with hip fractures reduces mortality, the number of complications, and the length of hospital stay and increases the functional abilities of the patients. In some Danish hospitals the two groups of doctors work closely together, in others there are few or no geriatricians.

Is mortality after hip fracture associated with surgical delay or admission during weekends and public holidays? A retrospective study of 38,020 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hip fractures are associated with high mortality, but the cause of this is still not entirely clear. We investigated the effect of surgical delay, weekends, holidays, and time of day admission on mortality in hip fracture patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using data from the Danish National Indicator Project, we identified 38,020 patients admitted from 2003 to 2010. Logistic regression analysis was used to study the association between sex, age, weekend or holiday admission, night-time admission, time to surgery, and ASA score on the one hand and mortality on the other. RESULTS: The risk of death in hospital increased with surgical delay (odds ratio (OR) = 1.3 per 24 h of delay), ASA score (OR (per point added) = 2.3), sex (OR for men 2.2), and age (OR (per 5 years) = 1.4). The mortality rate for patients admitted during weekends or public holidays, or at night, was similar to that found for those admitted during working days. INTERPRETATION: Minimizing surgical delay is the most important factor in reducing mortality in hip fracture patients.

Excess mortality in men compared with women following a hip fracture. National analysis of comedications, comorbidity and survival.

INTRODUCTION: osteoporosis is a common disease, and the incidence of osteoporotic fractures is expected to rise with the growing elderly population. Immediately following, and probably several years after a hip fracture, patients, both men and women, have a higher risk of dying compared to the general population regardless of age. The aim of this study was to assess excess mortality following hip fracture and, if possible, identify reasons for the difference between mortality for the two genders. METHODS: this is a nationwide register-based cohort study presenting data from the National Hospital Discharge Register on mortality, comorbidity and medication for all Danish patients (more than 41,000 persons) experiencing a hip fracture between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2002. Follow-up period was until 31 December 2005. RESULTS: we found a substantially higher mortality among male hip fracture patients than female hip fracture patients despite men being 4 years younger at the time of fracture. Both male and female hip fracture patients were found to have an excess mortality rate compared to the general population. The cumulative mortality at 12 months among hip fracture patients compared to the general population was 37.1% (9.9%) in men and 26.4% (9.3%) in women. In the first year, the risk of death significantly increased for women with increasing age (hazard ratio, HR: 1.06, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.06-1.07), the number of comedications (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.05) and the presence of specific Charlson index components and medications described below. For men, age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.07-1.08), number of comedications (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.07) and presence of different specific Charlson index components and medications increased the risk. Long-term survival analyses revealed that excess mortality for men compared with women remained strongly significant (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.65-1.75, P < 0.001), even when controlled for age, fracture site, the number of medications, exposure to drug classes A, C, D, G, J, M, N, P, S and for chronic comorbidities. CONCLUSION: excess mortality among male patients cannot be explained by controlling for known comorbidity and medications. Besides gender, we found higher age and multimorbidity to be related to an increased risk of dying within the first year after fracture; acute complications might be one of the explanations. This study emphasises the need for particular rigorous postoperative diagnostic evaluation and treatment of comorbid conditions in the male hip fracture patient.