Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel 2-phenyl-3-(1H-pyrazol-4-yl)pyridine positive allosteric modulators for the M4 mAChR.

Translation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonists into clinically used therapeutic agents has been difficult due to their poor subtype selectivity. M4 mAChR subtype-selective positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) may provide better therapeutic outcomes, hence investigating their detailed pharmacological properties is crucial to advancing them into the clinic. Herein, we report the synthesis and comprehensive pharmacological evaluation of M4 mAChR PAMs structurally related to 1e, Me-C-c, [11C]MK-6884 and [18F]12. Our results show that small structural changes to the PAMs can result in pronounced differences to baseline, potency (pEC50) and maximum effect (Emax) measures in cAMP assays when compared to the endogenous ligand acetylcholine (ACh) without the addition of the PAMs. Eight selected PAMs were further assessed to determine their binding affinity and potential signalling bias profile between cAMP and ß-arrestin 2 recruitment. These rigorous analyses resulted in the discovery of the novel PAMs, 6k and 6l, which exhibit improved allosteric properties compared to the lead compound, and probative in vivo exposure studies in mice confirmed that they maintain the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, making them more suitable for future preclinical assessment.

Pharmacological hallmarks of allostery at the M4 muscarinic receptor elucidated through structure and dynamics.

Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a major paradigm in drug discovery. Despite decades of research, a molecular-level understanding of the general principles that govern the myriad pharmacological effects exerted by GPCR allosteric modulators remains limited. The M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M4 mAChR) is a validated and clinically relevant allosteric drug target for several major psychiatric and cognitive disorders. In this study, we rigorously quantified the affinity, efficacy, and magnitude of modulation of two different positive allosteric modulators, LY2033298 (LY298) and VU0467154 (VU154), combined with the endogenous agonist acetylcholine (ACh) or the high-affinity agonist iperoxo (Ipx), at the human M4 mAChR. By determining the cryo-electron microscopy structures of the M4 mAChR, bound to a cognate Gi1 protein and in complex with ACh, Ipx, LY298-Ipx, and VU154-Ipx, and applying molecular dynamics simulations, we determine key molecular mechanisms underlying allosteric pharmacology. In addition to delineating the contribution of spatially distinct binding sites on observed pharmacology, our findings also revealed a vital role for orthosteric and allosteric ligand-receptor-transducer complex stability, mediated by conformational dynamics between these sites, in the ultimate determination of affinity, efficacy, cooperativity, probe dependence, and species variability. There results provide a holistic framework for further GPCR mechanistic studies and can aid in the discovery and design of future allosteric drugs.

Single nucleotide variations encoding missense mutations in G protein-coupled receptors may contribute to autism.

Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition with a range of symptoms that vary in intensity and severity from person to person. Genetic sequencing has identified thousands of genes containing mutations in autistic individuals, which may contribute to the development of autistic symptoms. Several of these genes encode G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are cell surface expressed proteins that transduce extracellular messages to the intracellular space. Mutations in GPCRs can impact their function, resulting in aberrant signalling within cells and across neurotransmitter systems in the brain. This review summarises the current knowledge on autism-associated single nucleotide variations encoding missense mutations in GPCRs and the impact of these genetic mutations on GPCR function. For some autism-associated mutations, changes in GPCR expression levels, ligand affinity, potency and efficacy have been observed. However, for many the functional consequences remain unknown. Thus, further work to characterise the functional impacts of the genetically identified mutations is required.

Opportunities and challenges for the development of M1 muscarinic receptor positive allosteric modulators in the treatment for neurocognitive deficits.

Targeting allosteric sites of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M1 receptors) is a promising strategy to treat neurocognitive disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. Indeed, the last two decades have seen an impressive body of work focussing on the design and development of positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) for the M1 receptor. This has led to the identification of a structurally diverse range of highly selective M1 PAMs. In preclinical models, M1 PAMs have shown rescue of cognitive deficits and improvement of endpoints predictive of symptom domains of schizophrenia. Yet, to date only a few M1 PAMs have reached early-stage clinical trials, with many of them failing to progress further due to on-target mediated cholinergic adverse effects that have plagued the development of this class of ligand. This review covers the recent preclinical and clinical studies in the field of M1 receptor drug discovery for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia, with a specific focus on M1 PAM, highlighting both the undoubted potential but also key challenges for the successful translation of M1 PAMs from bench-side to bedside.

Biased Profile of Xanomeline at the Recombinant Human M4 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor.

Many Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs are structural analogues of the endogenous (natural) ligands of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, it is becoming appreciated that chemically distinct ligands can bind to GPCRs in conformations that lead to different cellular signaling events, a phenomenon termed biased agonism. Despite this, the rigorous experimentation and analysis required to identify biased agonism are often not undertaken in most clinical candidates and go unrealized. Recently, xanomeline, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist, has entered phase III clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia. If successful, xanomeline will be the first novel FDA-approved antipsychotic drug in almost 50 years. Intriguingly, xanomeline's potential for biased agonism at the mAChRs and, in particular, the M4 mAChR, the most promising receptor target for schizophrenia, has not been assessed. Here, we quantify the biased agonism profile of xanomeline and three other mAChR agonists in Chinese hamster ovary cells recombinantly expressing the M4 mAChR. Agonist activity was examined across nine distinct signaling readouts, including the activation of five different G protein subtypes, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, ß-arrestin recruitment, calcium mobilization, and cAMP regulation. Relative to acetylcholine (ACh), xanomeline was biased away from ERK1/2 phosphorylation and calcium mobilization compared to Gαi2 protein activation. These findings likely have important implications for our understanding of the therapeutic action of xanomeline and call for further investigation into the in vivo consequences of biased agonism in drugs targeting the M4 mAChR for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Identification of a Novel Allosteric Site at the M5 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor.

The M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) has emerged as an exciting therapeutic target for the treatment of addiction and behavioral disorders. This has been in part due to promising preclinical studies with the M5 mAChR selective negative allosteric modulator (NAM), ML375. The binding site of ML375 remains unknown, however, making it difficult to develop improved M5 mAChR selective modulators. To determine the possible location of the ML375 binding site, we used radioligand binding and functional assays to show that ML375 does not interact with the well-characterized "common" mAChR allosteric site located in the receptor's extracellular vestibule, nor a previously proposed second allosteric site recognized by the modulator, amiodarone. Molecular docking was used to predict potential allosteric sites within the transmembrane (TM) domain of the M5 mAChR. These predicted sites were assessed using M5-M2 mAChR receptor chimeras and further targeted with site-directed mutagenesis, which enabled the identification of a putative binding site for ML375 at the interface of TMs 2-4. Collectively, these results identify a third allosteric site at the M5 mAChR and highlight the ability of allosteric modulators to selectively target highly conserved proteins.

Development of Novel 4-Arylpyridin-2-one and 6-Arylpyrimidin-4-one Positive Allosteric Modulators of the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor.

This study investigated the structure-activity relationships of 4-phenylpyridin-2-one and 6-phenylpyrimidin-4-one M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M1 mAChRs) positive allosteric modulators (PAMs). The presented series focuses on modifications to the core and top motif of the reported leads, MIPS1650 (1) and MIPS1780 (2). Profiling of our novel analogues showed that these modifications result in more nuanced effects on the allosteric properties compared to our previous compounds with alterations to the biaryl pendant. Further pharmacological characterisation of the selected compounds in radioligand binding, IP1 accumulation and ß-arrestin 2 recruitment assays demonstrated that, despite primarily acting as affinity modulators, the PAMs displayed different pharmacological properties across the two cellular assays. The novel PAM 7 f is a potential lead candidate for further development of peripherally restricted M1 PAMs, due to its lower blood-brain-barrier (BBB) permeability and improved exposure in the periphery compared to lead 2.

Restoring Agonist Function at a Chemogenetically Modified M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor.

Designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) have been successfully employed to activate signaling pathways associated with specific muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtypes. The M1 DREADD mAChR displays minimal responsiveness to the endogenous agonist acetylcholine (ACh) but responds to clozapine-N-oxide (CNO), an otherwise pharmacologically inert ligand. We have previously shown that benzyl quinolone carboxylic acid (BQCA), an M1 mAChR positive allosteric modulator (PAM), can rescue ACh responsiveness at these receptors. However, whether this effect is chemotype specific or applies to next-generation M1 PAMs with distinct scaffolds is unknown. Here, we reveal that new M1 PAMs restore ACh function at the M1 DREADD while modulating ACh binding at the M1 wild-type mAChR. Importantly, we demonstrate that the modulation of ACh function by M1 PAMs is translated in vivo using transgenic M1 DREADD mice. Our data provide important insights into mechanisms that define allosteric ligand modulation of agonist affinity vs efficacy and how these effects play out in the regulation of in vivo responses.

Fine Tuning Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Signaling Through Allostery and Bias.

The M1 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are highly pursued drug targets for neurological diseases, in particular for Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. Due to high sequence homology, selective targeting of any of the M1-M5 mAChRs through the endogenous ligand binding site has been notoriously difficult to achieve. With the discovery of highly subtype selective mAChR positive allosteric modulators in the new millennium, selectivity through targeting an allosteric binding site has opened new avenues for drug discovery programs. However, some hurdles remain to be overcome for these promising new drug candidates to progress into the clinic. One challenge is the potential for on-target side effects, such as for the M1 mAChR where over-activation of the receptor by orthosteric or allosteric ligands can be detrimental. Therefore, in addition to receptor subtype selectivity, a drug candidate may need to exhibit a biased signaling profile to avoid such on-target adverse effects. Indeed, recent studies in mice suggest that allosteric modulators for the M1 mAChR that bias signaling toward specific pathways may be therapeutically important. This review brings together details on the signaling pathways activated by the M1 and M4 mAChRs, evidence of biased agonism at these receptors, and highlights pathways that may be important for developing new subtype selective allosteric ligands to achieve therapeutic benefit.

Crystal structure of the M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

The human M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) has recently emerged as an exciting therapeutic target for treating a range of disorders, including drug addiction. However, a lack of structural information for this receptor subtype has limited further drug development and validation. Here we report a high-resolution crystal structure of the human M5 mAChR bound to the clinically used inverse agonist, tiotropium. This structure allowed for a comparison across all 5 mAChR family members that revealed important differences in both orthosteric and allosteric sites that could inform the rational design of selective ligands. These structural studies, together with chimeric swaps between the extracellular regions of the M2 and M5 mAChRs, provided structural insight into kinetic selectivity, where ligands show differential residency times between related family members. Collectively, our study provides important insights into the nature of orthosteric and allosteric ligand interaction across the mAChR family that could be exploited for the design of selective drugs.

6-Phenylpyrimidin-4-ones as Positive Allosteric Modulators at the M1 mAChR: The Determinants of Allosteric Activity.

Targeting allosteric sites of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) is an enticing approach to overcome the lack of receptor subtype selectivity observed with orthosteric ligands. This is a promising strategy for obtaining novel therapeutics to treat cognitive deficits observed in Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia, while reducing the peripheral side effects such as seen in the current treatment regimes, which are non-subtype selective. We previously described compound 2, the first positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of the M1 mAChR based on a 6-phenylpyrimidin-4-one scaffold, which has been further developed in this study. Herein, we present the synthesis, characterization, and pharmacological evaluation of a series of 6-phenylpyrimidin-4-ones with modifications to the 4-(1-methylpyrazol-4-yl)benzyl pendant. Selected compounds, BQCA, 1, 2, 9i, 13, 14b, 15c, and 15d, were further profiled in terms of their allosteric affinity, cooperativity with acetylcholine (ACh), and intrinsic efficacy. Additionally, 2 and 9i were tested in mouse primary cortical neurons, displaying various degrees of intrinsic agonism and potentiation of the acetylcholine response. Overall, the results suggest that the pendant moiety is important for allosteric binding affinity and the direct agonistic efficacy of the 6-phenylpyrimidin-4-one based M1 mAChR PAMs.

Assessment of the Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Novel 4-Phenylpyridine-2-One and 6-Phenylpyrimidin-4-One Allosteric Modulators at the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors.

Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) that target the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor (M1 mAChR) are potential treatments for cognitive deficits in conditions such as Alzheimer disease and schizophrenia. We recently reported novel 4-phenylpyridine-2-one and 6-phenylpyrimidin-4-one M1 mAChR PAMs with the potential to display different modes of positive allosteric modulation and/or agonism but whose molecular mechanisms of action remain undetermined. The current study compared the pharmacology of three such novel PAMs with the prototypical first-generation PAM, benzyl quinolone carboxylic acid (BQCA), in a recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line stably expressing the human M1 mAChR. Interactions between the orthosteric agonists and the novel PAMs or BQCA suggested their allosteric effects were solely governed by modulation of agonist affinity. The greatest degree of positive co-operativity was observed with higher efficacy agonists, whereas minimal potentiation was observed when the modulators were tested against the lower efficacy agonist, xanomeline. Each PAM was investigated for its effects on the endogenous agonist ACh on three different signaling pathways [extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 phosphorylation, inositol monophosphate (IP1) accumulation, and ß-arrestin-2 recruitment], revealing that the allosteric potentiation generally tracked with the efficiency of stimulus-response coupling, and that there was little pathway bias in the allosteric effects. Thus, despite the identification of novel allosteric scaffolds targeting the M1 mAChR, the molecular mechanism of action of these compounds is largely consistent with a model of allostery previously described for BQCA, suggesting that this may be a more generalized mechanism for M1 mAChR PAM effects than previously appreciated.

Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Heterocyclic Carboxamides: Positive Allosteric Modulators of the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor with Weak Agonist Activity and Diverse Modulatory Profiles.

Targeting allosteric sites at M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors is a promising strategy for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Positive allosteric modulators not only may potentiate binding and/or signaling of the endogenous agonist acetylcholine (ACh) but also may possess direct agonist activity (thus referred to as PAM-agonists). Recent studies suggest that PAM-agonists with robust intrinsic efficacy are more likely to produce adverse effects in vivo. Herein we present the synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of pyrrole-3-carboxamides with a diverse range of allosteric profiles. We proposed structural modifications at top, core, or pendant moieties of a prototypical molecule. Although generally there was a correlation between the degree of agonist activity and the modulatory potency of the PAMs, some derivatives displayed weak intrinsic efficacy yet maintained strong allosteric modulation. We also identified molecules with the ability to potentiate mainly the affinity or both affinity and efficacy of ACh.

Purinergic Receptor Transactivation by the ß2-Adrenergic Receptor Increases Intracellular Ca2+ in Nonexcitable Cells.

The ß2 adrenergic receptor (ß2AR) increases intracellular Ca2+ in a variety of cell types. By combining pharmacological and genetic manipulations, we reveal a novel mechanism through which the ß2AR promotes Ca2+ mobilization (pEC50 = 7.32 ± 0.10) in nonexcitable human embryonic kidney (HEK)293S cells. Downregulation of Gs with sustained cholera toxin pretreatment and the use of Gs-null HEK293 (∆Gs-HEK293) cells generated using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-associated protein-9 nuclease (CRISPR/Cas9) system, combined with pharmacological modulation of cAMP formation, revealed a Gs-dependent but cAMP-independent increase in intracellular Ca2+ following ß2AR stimulation. The increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+ was inhibited by P2Y purinergic receptor antagonists as well as a dominant-negative mutant form of Gq, a Gq-selective inhibitor, and an inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor antagonist, suggesting a role for this Gq-coupled receptor family downstream of the ß2AR activation. Consistent with this mechanism, ß2AR stimulation promoted the extracellular release of ATP, and pretreatment with apyrase inhibited the ß2AR-promoted Ca2+ mobilization. Together, these data support a model whereby the ß2AR stimulates a Gs-dependent release of ATP, which transactivates Gq-coupled P2Y receptors through an inside-out mechanism, leading to a Gq- and IP3-dependent Ca2+ mobilization from intracellular stores. Given that ß2AR and P2Y receptors are coexpressed in various tissues, this novel signaling paradigm could be physiologically important and have therapeutic implications. In addition, this study reports the generation and validation of HEK293 cells deleted of Gs using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology that will undoubtedly be powerful tools to study Gs-dependent signaling.

Endogenous allosteric modulators of G protein-coupled receptors.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest superfamily of receptors encoded by the human genome, and represent the largest class of current drug targets. Over the last decade and a half, it has become widely accepted that most, if not all, GPCRs possess spatially distinct allosteric sites that can be targeted by exogenous substances to modulate the receptors' biologic state. Although many of these allosteric sites are likely to serve other (e.g., structural) roles, they nonetheless possess appropriate properties to be serendipitously targeted by synthetic molecules. However, there are also examples of endogenous substances that can act as allosteric modulators of GPCRs. These include not only the obvious example, i.e., the G protein, but also a variety of ions, lipids, amino acids, peptides, and accessory proteins that display different degrees of receptor-specific modulatory effects. This also suggests that some GPCRs may possess true "orphan" allosteric sites for hitherto unappreciated endogenous modulators. Of note, the increasing identification of allosteric modulator lipids, inflammatory peptides, and GPCR-targeted autoantibodies indicates that disease context plays an important role in the generation of putative endogenous GPCR modulators. If an endogenous allosteric substance can be shown to play a role in disease, this could also serve as an impetus to pursue synthetic neutral allosteric ligands as novel therapeutic agents.

Quantification of ligand bias for clinically relevant ß2-adrenergic receptor ligands: implications for drug taxonomy.

The concepts of functional selectivity and ligand bias are becoming increasingly appreciated in modern drug discovery programs, necessitating more informed approaches to compound classification and, ultimately, therapeutic candidate selection. Using the ß2-adrenergic receptor as a model, we present a proof of concept study that assessed the bias of 19 ß-adrenergic ligands, including many clinically used compounds, across four pathways [cAMP production, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) activation, calcium mobilization, and receptor endocytosis] in the same cell background (human embryonic kidney 293S cells). Efficacy-based clustering placed the ligands into five distinct groups with respect to signaling signatures. In some cases, apparent functional selectivity originated from off-target effects on other endogenously expressed adrenergic receptors, highlighting the importance of thoroughly assessing selectivity of the responses before concluding receptor-specific ligand-biased signaling. Eliminating the nonselective compounds did not change the clustering of the 10 remaining compounds. Some ligands exhibited large differences in potency for the different pathways, suggesting that the nature of the receptor-effector complexes influences the relative affinity of the compounds for specific receptor conformations. Calculation of relative effectiveness (within pathway) and bias factors (between pathways) for each of the compounds, using an operational model of agonism, revealed a global signaling signature for all of the compounds relative to isoproterenol. Most compounds were biased toward ERK1/2 activation over the other pathways, consistent with the notion that many proximal effectors converge on this pathway. Overall, we demonstrate a higher level of ligand texture than previously anticipated, opening perspectives for the establishment of pluridimensional correlations between signaling profiles, drug classification, therapeutic efficacy, and safety.

H2 relaxin is a biased ligand relative to H3 relaxin at the relaxin family peptide receptor 3 (RXFP3).

Relaxin family peptide 3 receptors (RXFP3) are activated by H3-relaxin to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation and stimulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 phosphorylation. In this study, we sought to identify novel signaling pathways coupled to RXFP3 and to investigate whether other members of the relaxin peptide family activated these pathways. Two patterns of signaling were observed in RXFP3-expressing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 and human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells (CHO-RXFP3 and HEK-RXFP3) and murine septal neuron SN56 cell lines: 1) strong inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation, ERK1/2 activation and nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB reporter gene activation in cells stimulated with H3 relaxin, with weaker activity observed for H2 relaxin, porcine relaxin, or insulin-like peptide (INSL) 3 and 2) strong stimulation of activator protein (AP)-1 reporter genes by H2 relaxin, with weaker activation observed with H3 or porcine relaxin. Two distinct ligand binding sites were identified on RXFP3-expressing cells using two different radioligands. (125)I-INSL5 A-chain/relaxin-3 B-chain chimera bound with high affinity to the RXFP3-expressing cells with competition by H3 relaxin or a H3 relaxin B-chain dimeric peptide, consistent with previous reports. Binding studies with (125)I-H2 relaxin revealed a distinct binding site with potent competition observed with H2 relaxin, H3 relaxin, or INSL3 and weaker competition with porcine relaxin. Thus H3 relaxin potently activates all signaling pathways coupled to RXFP3, whereas H2 relaxin is an AP-1-biased ligand relative to H3 relaxin.

Roles of the receptor, the ligand, and the cell in the signal transduction pathways utilized by the relaxin family peptide receptors 1-3.

The relaxin-like peptides produce their effects by acting at four G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) RXFP1 to 4. RXFP1 and 2 are characterized by large extracellular domains containing leucine-rich repeats, whereas RXFP3 and 4 closely resemble small-peptide-liganded GPCRs. Studies with mutant RXFP1 receptors established that the final 10 amino acids of the C-terminus and Arg(752) in particular are obligatory for the second phase of cAMP signaling. Examination of the importance of cell type revealed different patterns of cAMP signaling related to the types of G-proteins expressed in these cells. Studies of RXFP3 signaling using reporter genes revealed that both relaxin and relaxin-3 activated the receptor but displayed different patterns of signaling. The studies suggest that the functional domains of the receptor, the cell type in which it is expressed, and the ligand used to activate the receptor all have important roles in determining the functional response observed.

Addition of a carboxy-terminal green fluorescent protein does not alter the binding and signaling properties of relaxin family Peptide receptor 3.

The relaxin family peptide receptor 3 (RXFP3) is the cognate receptor for the neuropeptide relaxin-3. RXFP3 was tagged at the carboxy-terminus with a variant of the green fluorescent protein (GFP(2)) for use in receptor localization studies. RXFP3-GFP(2) was examined to ensure it retained binding and signaling properties similar to untagged RXFP3. Competition for [(125)I]INSL5/H3 relaxin chimera binding to RXFP3 and RXFP3-GFP(2) indicated that the carboxy-terminal tag did not affect receptor binding or receptor internalization. RXFP3-GFP(2) activated ERK1/2 with a similar potency to RXFP3 when transiently expressed in CHO-K1 or HEK293T cells, suggesting that the GFP(2) tag did not affect receptor function. This study demonstrated that addition of a carboxy-terminal fusion protein to RXFP3 did not alter the binding or signaling properties of RXFP3, making RXFP3-GFP(2) a useful tool for future receptor localization and trafficking studies.

Relaxin family peptide receptor (RXFP1) coupling to G(alpha)i3 involves the C-terminal Arg752 and localization within membrane Raft Microdomains.

The relaxin family peptide receptors (RXFP) 1 and 2 are targets for the relaxin family peptides relaxin and insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3), respectively. Although both receptors and peptides share a high degree of sequence identity, the cAMP signaling pathways activated by the two systems are quite distinct. Relaxin activation of RXFP1 initially results in accumulation of cAMP via G(alpha)(s), but this is modulated by inhibition of cAMP through G(alpha)(oB). Over time, RXFP1 recruits coupling to G(alpha)(i3), causing additional cAMP accumulation via a G(alpha)(i3)-Gbetagamma-phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase C (PKC)zeta pathway. In contrast, INSL3 activation of RXFP2 results in accumulation of cAMP only via G(alpha)(s), modulated by cAMP inhibition through G(alpha)(oB). Thus, the aim of this study was to identify the cause of differential G-protein coupling between these highly similar receptors. Construction of chimeric receptors revealed that G(alpha)(i3) coupling is dependent upon the transmembrane region of RXFP1 and independent of the receptor ectodomain or ligand bound. Generation of C-terminal truncated receptors identified the terminal 10 amino acids of the RXFP1 C terminus as essential for G(alpha)(i3) signaling, and point mutations revealed an obligatory role for Arg(752). RXFP1-mediated G(alpha)(i3), but not G(alpha)(s) or G(alpha)(oB), signaling was also found to be dependent upon membrane rafts, and RXFP1 coupled to G(alpha)(i3) after only 3 min of receptor stimulation. Therefore, RXFP1 coupling to the G(alpha)(i3)-Gbetagamma-PI3K-PKCzeta pathway requires the terminal 10 amino acids of the RXFP1 C terminus and membrane raft localization, and the observed delay in this pathway occurs downstream of G(alpha)(i3).