Near-Zero Temperature Coefficient of Resonance Frequency in Rare-Earth Titanates via the Phase Transition Strategy.

This study presents an approach to achieve a near-zero temperature coefficient of resonance frequency (τf) in rare-earth titanate microwave dielectric ceramics (MWDCs) by inducing a phase transition. By Zr4+ substitution at the B site, a series of Sm2Ti1-xZrxO5 (0.02 ≤ x ≤ 0.55) ceramics are synthesized using the solid-state method to intentionally alter the radius ratio of the A/B sites, realizing in a controlled phase transition from orthorhombic (Pnma) to biphasic coexistence and ultimately to cubic (Fd3̅m) structure. The phase composition is rigorously identified through X-ray diffraction (XRD) Rietveld refinement, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), selected-area electron diffraction (SAED), and Raman spectroscopy. A comprehensive analysis is conducted to elucidate the relationships between factors such as ionic polarizability, packing fraction, bond valence, complex chemical bonding, and far-infrared reflectivity spectra with microwave dielectric properties. The results demonstrate that these ceramics exhibit a broad range of permittivity (14.30-23.18), high-quality factors (14,828-22,300 GHz), opposite temperature coefficient of resonance frequency (-16.0 to + 22.4 ppm/°C), and nice thermal conductivity (1.81-2.76 W·m-1·K-1), particularly at x = 0.30 with a near-zero τf value of +1.6 ppm/°C. The findings not only provide insights into designing MWDCs with a near-zero τf but also offer a promising route for developing advanced microwave materials with improved performance and reliability.

Navigating the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) Success: Insights From Pre-assessment Practices in Preparing Surgical Residents for Competitive Sub-specialties.

Introduction The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is a critical tool in assessing surgical residents' readiness for board certification and clinical practice. While various factors influencing ABSITE performance have been examined, the impact of innovative educational resources, such as TrueLearn, remains underexplored. TrueLearn's adaptive learning algorithms and comprehensive question banks offer a promising adjunct to traditional study methods. This study investigates the relationship between TrueLearn utilization and ABSITE performance among general surgery residents. Methods This retrospective study, ethically approved by the Marshall University Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 2097669-1), analyzed the performance of general surgery residents at Marshall University from 2014 to 2022. Data were collected on ABSITE scores. Additionally, quiz percentages (Quiz %) and scores from two mock exams (Exam 1 and Exam 2), all provided by the TrueLearn platform, were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics summarized the sample characteristics. Linear mixed models were employed to examine the associations between TrueLearn engagement and ABSITE performance, accounting for the correlated nature of the data and addressing any missing data at random. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), with significance defined as a p-value < 0.05. Results The study cohort included 58 residents from 2016 to 2022. Linear mixed model analysis revealed significant positive correlations between TrueLearn Quiz %, Exam 1 scores, and Exam 2 scores with ABSITE performance. A 1% increase in Quiz % was associated with a 0.77-point rise in ABSITE scores (95% CI: 0.65, 0.89; p < 0.0001). For Exam 1, each point increase corresponded to a 6.36-point increase in ABSITE scores (95% CI: 5.01, 7.7; p < 0.0001), while Exam 2 scores showed a 3.8-point increase per point (95% CI: 2.74, 4.86; p < 0.0001). Discussion and conclusion Our findings underscore the significant impact of TrueLearn engagement on ABSITE performance, with higher quiz percentages and mock exam scores predictive of better ABSITE outcomes. This suggests that regular use of TrueLearn's educational resources enhances residents' knowledge and exam readiness. These results advocate for the integration of innovative educational tools such as TrueLearn into surgical training programs to optimize study strategies and improve exam performance. However, the study's retrospective design and single-institution focus limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research should explore these relationships in diverse settings and specialties and consider additional factors influencing ABSITE performance. This study highlights the positive association between TrueLearn utilization and ABSITE performance among general surgery residents, emphasizing the importance of innovative educational resources in surgical training. By enhancing engagement with platforms such as TrueLearn, surgical programs can improve residents' readiness for high-stakes examinations, ultimately contributing to the development of proficient surgical practitioners.

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA): An Iterative Approach to Optimize Residents Performance in the American Board of Surgery in-Training Exam (ABSITE).

INTRODUCTION: American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ITE), or ABSITE, preparation requires an effective study approach. In 2014, the ABS announced the alignment of ABSITE to the SCORE® Curriculum. We hypothesized that implementing a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach would help surgery residents improve their performance on the ABSITE. METHOD: Over 20 years, in a single institution, residents' ABSITE performance was evaluated over 3 timeframes: Time A (2004-2013), no specific curriculum; Time B (2014-2019), an annual comprehensive ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based multiple-choice exam (MCQ) was administered; and Time C (2020-2023), like Time B with the addition of the PDSA approach for those with less than 60% correct on the ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam. At the beginning of the academic year, in July, all residents are encouraged to (1) initiate a study plan for the upcoming ABSITE using SCORE® guided by the published ABSITE outlines content topics (Plan), (2) take an ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam in October (Do), (3) assess the results/scores (Study), and (4) identify appropriate next steps (Act). Correlational analysis was performed to evaluate the association between ABSITE scores and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time B and Time C. The primary outcome was the change in the proportions of ABSITE scores <30th percentile. RESULTS: A total of 294 ABSITE scores of 94 residents (34 females and 60 males) were analyzed. We found stronger correlation between the correct percentage on ABSITE and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time C (r = 0.73, p < 0.0001) compared to Time B (0.62, p < 0.0001). The percentage of residents with ABSITE scores lower than 30th percentile dropped significantly from 14.0% to 3.7% (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Implementing the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach using the SCORE® curriculum significantly enhances residents' performance on the ABSITE exam. Surgery residents are encouraged to use this approach and to utilize the SCORE-contents outlined by the ABS in their study plan.

Performance of ChatGPT on American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Preparation Questions.

INTRODUCTION: Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a large language model capable of generating human-like text. This study sought to evaluate ChatGPT's performance on Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE) self-assessment questions. METHODS: General surgery multiple choice questions were randomly selected from the SCORE question bank. ChatGPT (GPT-3.5, April-May 2023) evaluated questions and responses were recorded. RESULTS: ChatGPT correctly answered 123 of 200 questions (62%). ChatGPT scored lowest on biliary (2/8 questions correct, 25%), surgical critical care (3/10, 30%), general abdomen (1/3, 33%), and pancreas (1/3, 33%) topics. ChatGPT scored higher on biostatistics (4/4 correct, 100%), fluid/electrolytes/acid-base (4/4, 100%), and small intestine (8/9, 89%) questions. ChatGPT answered questions with thorough and structured support for its answers. It scored 56% on ethics questions and provided coherent explanations regarding end-of-life discussions, communication with coworkers and patients, and informed consent. For many questions answered incorrectly, ChatGPT provided cogent, yet factually incorrect descriptions, including anatomy and steps of operations. In two instances, it gave a correct explanation but chose the wrong answer. It did not answer two questions, stating it needed additional information to determine the next best step in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT answered 62% of SCORE questions correctly. It performed better at questions requiring standard recall but struggled with higher-level questions that required complex clinical decision making, despite providing detailed responses behind its rationale. Due to its mediocre performance on this question set and sometimes confidently-worded, yet factually inaccurate responses, caution should be used when interpreting ChatGPT's answers to general surgery questions.

Structured Textbook Review and Individualized Learning Plans Successfully Remediate Underperforming Residents and Improve General Surgery Program Performance on the ABSITE.

Background: We endeavored to create an evidence-based curriculum to improve general surgery resident fund of knowledge. Global and resident-specific interventions were employed to this end. These interventions were monitored via multiple choice question results on a weekly basis and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) performance. Methods: This study was performed in a prospective manner over a 2-year period. A structured textbook review with testing was implemented for all residents. A focused textbook question-writing assignment and a Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE)-based individualized learning plan (ILP) were implemented for residents scoring below the 35th percentile on the ABSITE. Results: Curriculum implementation resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the number of residents scoring below the 35th percentile, from 50% to 30.8% (P = .023). One hundred percent of residents initially scoring below the 35th percentile were successfully remediated over the study period. Average overall program ABSITE percentile scores increased from 38.5% to 51.4% over a 2-year period. Conclusion: Structured textbook review and testing combined with a question-writing assignment and a SCORE-focused ILP successfully remediated residents scoring below the 35th percentile and improved general surgery residency ABSITE performance.

Preliminary Development of a Program ABSITE Dashboard (PAD) to Guide Curriculum Innovation.

PURPOSE: Medical Knowledge for general surgery residents' is assessed by the American Board of Surgery In- Training Examination (ABSITE). ASBITE score reports contain many metrics residency directors can utilize to assess resident progress and perform program evaluation. The purpose of this study was to develop a framework to evaluate program effectiveness in teaching specific subtest and subtopic areas of the ABSITE, using ABSITE score reports as an indicator. The aim is to demonstrate the identification of topic areas of weakness in program-wide performance on the ABSITE to guide proposed modification of the general surgery residency program curriculum, and to initiate development of a data visualizing dashboard to communicate these metrics. METHODS: A single institution retrospective study was performed utilizing ABSITE score reports from general surgery residents at a large academic training program from 2017 to 2020. ABSITE performance metrics from 320 unique records were entered into a database; statistical analysis for linear trends and variance were conducted for standard scores, subtest standard scores, and incorrect subtest topics. Deviation from national average scores were calculated by subtracting the national average score from each subtest score for each trainee. Data were displayed as medians or proportions and are displayed to optimize visualization as a proof-of-concept for the development of a program dashboard. RESULTS: Trends and variance in general surgery program and cohort performance on various elements of the ABSITE were visualized using figures and tables that represent a prototype for a program dashboard. Figure A1 demonstrates one example, in which a heatmap displays the median deviation from national average scores for each subtest by program year. Boxplots show the distribution of the deviation from national average, range for national average scores, and the recorded scores for each subtest by program year. Trends in median deviation from the national average scores are displayed for each program year paneled by subtest or for each exam year paneled by cohort. Median change in overall test scores from one program year to another in a cohort is visualized as a table. Bar graphs show the most often missed topics across all program years and heatmaps were generated showing the proportion of times each topic was missed for each subtest and exam year. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate use of ABSITE reports to identify specific thematic areas of opportunities for curriculum modification and innovation as an element of program evaluation. In this study we demonstrate, through data analysis and visualization, feasibility for the creation of a Program ABSITE Dashboard (PAD) that enhances the use of ABSITE reports for formative program evaluation and can guide modifications to surgery program curriculum and educational practices.

National ABSITE Preparation Practices: A Survey of General Surgery Residency Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) was designed as a low-stakes, medical knowledge examination for US general surgery residency programs. However, in practice, this exam has been utilized for higher stakes purposes, such as resident promotion or remediation, and fellowship selection. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of ABSITE preparation resources, but best practices for ABSITE preparation and national preparatory habits are currently unknown. The aim of this work was to determine current residency programs' strategies for ABSITE preparation. DESIGN: We distributed an electronic survey to program directors or program coordinators of US general surgery programs asking them to anonymously report program ABSITE educational practices and ABSITE scores. We analyzed the proportion of responses using descriptive statistics and compared the effect of various strategies using the Mann-Whitney testing for nonparametric data. An average ABSITE percentile score was calculated for each residency based on program self-reported scores. SETTING: Association of Program Directors (APDS) Listserv PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residency programs participating at the time of distribution (278). RESULTS: Response rate was 24% (66/278); 41 programs (62.1%) identified as university-affiliated, and 25 (37.9%) were community-based. Median intern class size was 8 (range: 3-14), including preliminary interns. Average ABSITE percentile score was 52.8% (range 36.9%-67.6%). There were no significant differences in ABSITE scores based on affiliation or program size. Educational resources utilized for ABSITE preparation included SCORE (89.3%), Q-banks (50%), and surgical textbooks (25.8%). The majority (56.1%) of programs reported using a year-long curriculum for ABSITE preparation, and 66.6% used a time-limited curriculum completed in the months immediately prior to ABSITE. Most programs reported that ABSITE scores were a low priority (63.6%) or not a priority (13.6%). The existence of a year-long curriculum for ABSITE was positively correlated with score as compared to programs without a year-long curricula (53.9% vs 48.5%, p <0.01). Programs using a time-limited curriculum demonstrated lower scores as compared to programs without time-limited curricula (51.3% v 56.1%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: General surgery programs use a variety of strategies to prepare residents for the ABSITE. Despite reporting that they utilize ABSITE scores for a variety of high stakes purposes including evaluation for promotion and as a predictor of the preparedness for the ABS QE, many programs reported that they consider ABSITE scores as a low priority. A year-long focused curriculum was the only strategy correlated with increased scores, which may reflect the value of encouraging consistent studying and spaced repetition. Additional work is needed to guide programs in optimal utilization of ABSITE scores for remediation and resident evaluation, as well as understanding how ABSITE preparatory strategies correlate with clinical performance.

Just Do It: Participation in Structured Online Curricula Reliably Improves Low ABSITE Scores.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized residents enrolled in an Accelerated Clinical Education in Surgery (ACES) program would improve their scores to above the 30th percentile. We analyzed which components of ACES correlated with improvement. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective review of three academic cycles (2018-2021) at an academic general surgery residency. PARTICIPANTS: Residents scoring ≤30th percentile on the ABSITE were enrolled in ACES. Baseline demographics including STEP scores were collected. ACES included: (1) SCORE and DeckerMed assignments (2) Weekly faculty review sessions and (3) Monthly meeting with assigned mentor. Data were analyzed by Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Twenty-six surgical residents enrolled in ACES. Compared to residents not in ACES, there was no significant difference females (15 vs. 15; p = 0.19) and STEP 2 scores (241 vs. 246; p = 0.06). Residents in ACES had significantly lower STEP 1 (225 vs. 237; p < 0.001) and STEP 3 (212 vs. 223; p < 0.001) scores. Demographics of ACES residents who subsequently scored >30th percentile were similar to those who didn't, except for STEP 3 scores (216 vs. 204; p = 0.008). For residents in ACES, the completion of assignments between July and January was significantly higher for those who subsequently achieved an ABSITE score >30th percentile: TWIS, 77% vs. 53% (p = 0.022), Decker WC, 80% vs. 49% (p = 0.009) and Decker MR, 53% vs. 29% (p = 0.016). Completion of an online practice exam prior to ABSITE also correlated with score >30th percentile (57% vs. 13%, p = 0.007). There was also no correlation between the number of faculty review sessions and ABSITE (11.5 vs.11.9, p = 0.931). CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a structured online program of reading and quizzes was durably effective in improving ABSITE scores >30th percentile. Completion of online assignments, rather than scores on practice tests or review sessions, appeared to be the most important factor for success.

Can Customized YouTube Videos Improve ABSITE Performance?

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic decreased in-person didactic sessions in our general surgery residency. We piloted a program to develop online tutorials posted to a YouTube channel designed to prepare our residents for the ABSITE examination. METHODS: Study participants were General Surgery residents in our five-year ACGME accredited general surgery residency program who took the ABSITE in-service exam between 2019 and 2021. We compared raw scores and overall programmatic percentile scores for three academic years (2018-2019, 2019-2020, and 2020-2021). RESULTS: From academic year 2018-2019 to 2019-2020, before introducing the YouTube teaching platform, average raw scores and percentile scores among our general surgery residents remained unchanged (raw scores 64 - 65% (p = ns), percentile scores 39 to 37% (p = ns)). However, raw ABSITE scores increased significantly after introducing the YouTube teaching platform. A one-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference in raw ABSITE scores for AY 2020-2021 compared to the two prior years (F(2, 30) = [1.193], P < 0.01). Mean percentile ranking scores (program-wide) increased 15% from AY 2018-2019 to AY 2020-2021 (Figure1). CONCLUSION: Teaching via an online platform such as YouTube allows residents to review material at their own pace and schedule. It is other our hypothesis is that the online YouTube material presented in the Ventura Surgery School channel contributed, in part, to this relative improvement compared to resident peers in other institutions. Teaching via an online platform could be a valuable tool to educate surgical learners in our ever-changing teaching environment.

Synergic Enhancement of Energy Storage Density and Efficiency in MnO2-Doped AgNbO3@SiO2 Ceramics via A/B-Site Substitutions.

Dielectric energy storage devices with high power density show great potential in applications of smart grids, electrical vehicles, pulsed power weapons, and so on. However, their limited recoverable energy density badly restricts their utilization and harms the miniaturization, portability, and integration of electronics. Herein, equivalent amounts of Bi2O3 and Sc2O3 were introduced to improve the energy storage property of 0.10 wt % MnO2-doped AgNbO3@SiO2 ceramics by simultaneously enhancing the maximum polarization, breakdown strength, and relaxation feature. It is particularly interesting that the AgNbO3-based ceramics with 4 mol % Bi2O3 and Sc2O3 demonstrate the recoverable energy storage density of 5.9 J/cm3 with the energy storage efficiency of 71%, exhibiting 1.9 and 1.4 times enhancement compared to 0.10 wt % MnO2-doped AgNbO3@SiO2 ceramics. In addition, the benign energy storage performance can be maintained at elevated temperatures and frequencies and up to 105 cycling, indicating great potential in advanced high-power applications.

United States medical licensing examination Step 1 scores are a quantifiably better predictor of American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination success compared to Step 2 scores.

BACKGROUND: United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 (STEP 1) and Step 2 (STEP 2) scores are used in the selection of surgery residents. The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is employed to assess resident knowledge. We sought to determine whether both STEP 1 and/or STEP 2 were predictive of ABSITE performance. METHODS: We performed a 10-year retrospective analysis of all PGY levels comparing STEP 1 and 2 scores with raw ABSITE scores and percentile rank. Additionally, we analyzed STEP 1 and 2 scores for the likelihood of scoring above the 20th percentile on the ABSITE. RESULTS: When STEP 1 and STEP 2 scores were evaluated separately, both were independent predictors of ABSITE performance. However, when STEP 1 and STEP 2 scores were evaluated together, only STEP 1 scores were predictive of ABSITE performance. Finally, only STEP 1 scores were predictive of scoring above the 20th percentile. CONCLUSION: STEP 1 scores are a better predictor of ABSITE performance than STEP 2.

How to Prepare for the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE): A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Performance on ABSITE is an important factor when monitoring resident progress. It predicts future performance and has lasting effects. Understanding the highest-yield preparation strategies can help residents in their study efforts and optimize performance. METHODS: A literature search was conducted searching PubMed, EMBASE and JAMA Network in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were performed for the terms "ABSITE" and "American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination". Only studies discussing individual study habits from May 2011 to May 2021 were included. RESULTS: 19 studies were included in qualitative synthesis. Year-round clinical study failed to show significant correlation to ABSITE performance although year-round ABSITE review was more consistently correlated. During a dedicated study period, increased time and increased total practice questions completed are associated with improved performance. The correlation of individual resources such as ABSITE review books, textbooks, audio podcasts and ABSITE preparatory courses to improved ABSITE performance was not proven. CONCLUSIONS: Residents should optimize study strategies based on methods that have consistently shown to improve performance. Recommendations for best preparation strategies are provided.

Trainee Utilization of the SCORE Curriculum is Associated With Improved ABSITE Performance: A Multi-institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: The Surgical Council on Resident Education's (SCORE) structured educational curriculum for general surgery residents uses a 2-year repeating cycle of modules and quizzes called "This Week in SCORE" (TWIS) to organize and sequence the curricular content on the SCORE portal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of using the SCORE content and TWIS curriculum on American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) performance. To date, no multi-institutional studies have examined this effect. METHODS: Eight residency programs participated, including university and community-based programs. SCORE usage overall, TWIS usage, and ABSITE percentile scores (adjusted for post-graduate year [PGY]) were analyzed for the academic years 2017 to 2020. SCORE usage was defined as number of SCORE logins annually per resident with "low usage" ≤10 times and "high usage" >10 times. TWIS usage was defined as "low usage" (no TWIS quizzes done) or "high usage" (≥1 TWIS quiz per year). RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-eight trainees were evaluated. Trainees with high SCORE and TWIS usage consistently achieved a higher ABSITE percentile score. This difference was maintained in subgroup analysis by PGY with the greatest impact in PGY-1 and PGY-2 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of multiple aspects of SCORE content appears to have a significant positive impact on ABSITE performance across all levels of postgraduate training. This multi-institutional study of a large number of users is the first to demonstrate that increased usage of SCORE content appears to be a predictor of ABSITE performance success.

Evidence-Based Selection of Surgical Residents.

Residency programs should use a systematic method of recruitment that begins with defining unique desired candidate attributes. Commonly sought-after characteristics may be delineated via the residency application. Scores from standardized examinations taken in medical school predict academic success, and may correlate to overall performance. Strong letters of recommendation and a personal history of prior success outside the medical field both forecast success in residency. Interviews are crucial to determining fit within a program, and remain a valid measure of an applicant's ability to prosper in a particular program, even with many interviews being completed in the virtual realm.

SCORE-Based Simulated ABSITE Exam Performance as a Predictor of Performance on the ABSITE.

INTRODUCTION: The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is a crucial, objective assessment of surgical knowledge during training. In 2014, the American Board of Surgery (ABS) announced the alignment of the ABSITE to the SCORE® (Surgical Council on Resident Education) Curriculum Outline for General Surgery Residency. We hypothesized that implementing a pre-ABSITE SCORE-based exam would help identify underperforming residents and provide early guidance to improve performance on the ABSITE. METHODS: In October 2014, our university-based surgical residency program began administering a yearly comprehensive pre-ABSITE SCORE-based exam consisting of 225 to 250 multiple-choice questions selected from the SCORE question bank to all our general surgery residents, preliminary and categorical. The 4-hour exam addresses both clinical management (80%) and applied sciences (20%). Residents receive reports with their scores (percentage correct). Residents performing at less than 60% meet with the Program Director for discussion and formulation of a study plan. Correlational analysis was performed between resident ABSITE scores, pre-ABSITE SCORE-based exam scores, gender, resident status (preliminary vs. categorical), postgraduate year (PGY), and the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores. RESULTS: A total of 244 exam scores (122 pre-ABSITE SCORE-based exams and 122 matched ABSITE) were completed by 51 residents at different PGY levels (32 PGY1, 32 PGY2, 20 PGY3, 19 PGY4, and 18 PGY5). Fifty-seven percent were males, 62% were categorical residents, and 38% were preliminary residents. October pre-ABSITE SCORE-based exam scores were compared to the subsequent January ABSITE scores. Categorical residents completed 101 (83%) of the January exams, while preliminary residents completed 21 (17%) of these paired exams. We found strong correlations between the correct percentage on ABSITE and pre-ABSITE SCORE-based scores (r = 0.637, p < 0.001), between the correct percentage on ABSITE and PGY (r = 0.688, p < 0.001), and between ABSITE and resident status (r = 0.462, p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a weak to negligible correlation between the correct percentage on ABSITE and resident gender (r = 0.274, p = 0.001), USMLE-2 (r = 0.12, p = 0.16), and USMLE-1 (r = 0.04, p = 0.653). Multiple regression analysis, with all predictors, was performed to predict the percentage score on the ABSITE and produced R2 0.58, with an adjusted R2 of 0.57, with a large size effect, p < 0.001. After controlling for the other variables, three factors reached statistical significance (p < 0.05): pre-ABSITE SCORE-based exam scores, PGY, and resident gender. CONCLUSION: We found a strong correlation between performance on the pre-ABSITE SCORE-based exam and performance on the ABSITE exam. Surgery residents are encouraged to start studying earlier and to utilize SCORE contents as outlined by the ABS in their study plan.

Predictive Factors of First Time Pass Rate on the American Board of Surgery Certification in General Surgery Exams: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: General Surgery residency programs are evaluated on their American Board of Surgery (ABS) Qualifying examination (QE) and Certifying examination (CE) pass rates. This systematic review aims to evaluate predictive factors of ABS QE and CE first time pass rates. DESIGN: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, the following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, JAMA Network, and Google Scholar. Studies available in the English language published between January 2000 and July 2020 were deemed eligible. Articles that did not assess either of the ABS board examinations performance and pass-rates as outcomes were excluded. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine was used to determine the quality and risk of bias of each study. RESULTS: A total of 31 publications were included for analysis. Undergraduate medical education variables associated with first-time pass rates on the QE and CE include USMLE score, AOA membership, and class rank. Program factors affecting pass rates include program size, geographic location, and Program Director turnover. There is strong correlation between ABSITE and QE. Evidence supports the utility of mock oral examinations (MOEs) in predicting CE success. CONCLUSIONS: ABSITE scores demonstrated higher correlation with QE pass rate than CE pass rate. MOEs have a positive association with first-time CE pass rates. Nonmodifiable factors such as race/ethnicity, marital status, and geographic location were also found to be predictors. Delaying board certification examination beyond 1 year after residency graduation significantly reduces first-time pass rate.

Let's Not Throw the Baby Out with the Bath Water - Keep the ABSITE a Numerically Scored Exam.

The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is a low-stakes, validated, objective measure of the medical knowledge of our surgical residents and is an important predictor of ABS Qualifying Exam (QE) passage. It was never intended to serve as a global assessment of resident performance or aptitude, to assess any competency other than medical knowledge, or to serve as the sole criterion by which to judge resident promotion to the next PGY level. Though the scoring of the ABSITE and the use of the exam by some PDs and fellowship directors may be imperfect, let's not throw the baby out with the bath water and destroy the utility of the ABSITE by changing its grading to pass/fail. Rather, let's set rigorous, high standards for our residents in preparation for the ABSITE, as well as for PDs and fellowship directors in the proper interpretation of the ABSITE as a formative assessment of resident knowledge progression as opposed to a high-stakes summative exam.

Spaced Education With ABSITE Quest Resulting in Improved American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Performance.

OBJECTIVE: The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is an annual exam taken by general surgery residents as a cognitive assessment of the knowledge gained throughout each year of training. Several question banks are available for ABSITE preparation. However, ABSITE Quest (AQ) utilizes a method called spaced education which has been demonstrated to help with retaining information longer and improve exam performance. This study hypothesizes that using this method will help residents improve their ABSITE performance. DESIGN: Retrospective survey data was collected from residents who participated in AQ, including postgraduate year (PGY) level, as well as 2019 and 2020 ABSITE percentiles. AQ user data was used to match respondent's total number of questions completed and daily engagement level to the survey data. Paired, single-tailed student's t test was used to evaluate the significance of ABSITE percentile change between 2019 and 2020 among AQ users. SETTING: ChristianaCare, Newark, DE, United States. Nonclinical. PARTICIPANTS: All ABSITE Quest users were surveyed (n = 390), of which 104 responded. 21 responses were from PGY1 residents and were excluded, resulting in a total of 83 responses. RESULTS: The mean percentile difference of AQ users from 2019 to 2020 was +15.8 (p < 0.00001). When categorizing by the total number of questions completed, high users demonstrated a mean percentile difference of +15.3 (p = 0.00002), average users had a difference of +19.1 (p = 0.00029), and low users showed a percentile difference of +1.2 (p = 0.45244). When categorizing by daily engagement level, high users demonstrated a mean percentile difference of +17.9 (p < 0.00001), low users had a mean percentile difference of +15.3 (p = 0.00124), and minimal users showed a mean percentile change of -5.7. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the spaced education method with ABSITE Quest, especially in users with a greater number of questions completed and high levels of daily engagement, correlated with a significant improvement on ABSITE performance.

International Medical Graduates are Comparable to American Medical Graduates as General Surgery Interns.

BACKGROUND: International medical graduates (IMGs) are often relegated to preliminary positions in general surgery (GS) owing to uncertainties about the candidate's performance in the American healthcare setting. We aimed to determine the comparative performance of IMGs and American medical graduates (AMGs) at baseline and assess these trends over the course of their GS internship. METHODS: Evaluations of all IMG preliminary and AMG categorical interns from 2013 to 2017 at our GS residency program were obtained from three faculty members to score overall performance, technical skills, interpersonal communication, and medical knowledge on a 10-point Likert scale. Scores on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam, an in-house preparation test, United States Medical Licensing Exam, and performance during the biannual multistation objective assessments were compared between the two resident groups. RESULTS: Seventy-two interns (28 [39%] AMG categorical and 44 [61%] IMG preliminary) met inclusion criteria. The AMG group had significantly higher median Step 1 and Step 2 scores compared with our IMG group (243 versus 231, P = 0.002, and 250 versus 246, P = 0.03, respectively).Although in-house preparation test scores were higher among IMGs (median [interquartile range] of 36 [33-40] among AMGs and 38 [34-45] among IMGs; P = 0.002), there were no statistically significant differences between the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam scores of the two groups. The median scores for the four faculty evaluation components were similar between the AMG (7, 8, 7, 7) and IMG resident groups (7, 7, 7, 7; P = nonsignificant). IMGs scored significantly higher in both biannual multistation objective assessments than AMGs (median [interquartile range] July: 59 [47-91] versus 55 [37-62], P = 0.005; January: 103 [86-116] versus 91 [87-104], P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: It is reassuring to confirm that no matter where they are from, great candidates can perform well as surgical interns in a GS training program.

The Surgical Knowledge "Growth Curve": Predicting ABSITE Scores and Identifying "At-Risk" Residents.

OBJECTIVE: Resident performance on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is used for evaluation of surgical knowledge and guides resident selection for institutional remediation programs. Remediation thresholds have historically been based on ABSITE percentile scores; however, this does not account for predictors that can impact a resident's exam performance. We sought to identify predictors of yearly ABSITE performance to help identify residents "at-risk" for performing below their expected growth trajectory. DESIGN: The knowledge of the residents, as measured by standardized ABSITE scores, was modeled as a function of the corresponding postgraduate year via a linear mixed effects regression model. Additional model covariates included written USMLE-1-3 examination scores, gender, number of practice questions completed, and percentage correct of practice questions. For each resident, the predicted ABSITE standard score along with a 95% bootstrap prediction interval was obtained. Both resident-specific and population-level predictions for ABSITE standard scores were also estimated. SETTING: The study was conducted at a single, large academic medical center (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA). PARTICIPANTS: Six years of general surgery resident score reports at a single institution between 2014 and 2019 were deidentified and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 376 score reports from 130 residents were analyzed. Covariates that had a significant effect on the model included USMLE-1 score (PGY1: p = 0.013; PGY2: p = 0.007; PGY3: p = 0.011), USMLE-2 score (PGY1: p < 0.001; PGY2: p < 0.001; PGY3: p < 0.001; PGY4: p < 0.001; PGY5: p = 0.032), male gender (PGY1: p = 0.003; PGY2: p < 0.001; PGY3: p < 0.001; PGY4: p = 0.008), and number of practice questions completed (p=0.003). Five residents were identified as having "fallen off" their predicted knowledge curve, including a single resident on 2 occasions. Population prediction curves were obtained at 7 different covariate percentile levels (5%, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, and 95%) that could be used to plot predicted resident knowledge progress. CONCLUSION: Performance on USMLE-1 and -2 examinations, male gender, and number of practice questions completed were positive predictors of ABSITE performance. Creating residency-wide knowledge growth curves as well as individualized predictive ABSITE performance models allows for more efficient identification of residents potentially at risk for poor ABSITE performance and structured monitoring of surgical knowledge progression.