Absorbable vs. non-absorbable suture: which one gives better results?

BACKGROUND: There is no ideal suture material or ideal sewing technique. The type of suture material affects the quality of the scars. Patient and surgeon satisfaction with the quality and comfort of the scar is one of the main goals of modern surgery. AIMS: This study aims to compare the quality of scars and patient satisfaction after using two different types of sutures. METHODS: This research was conducted as a prospective study that included 64 patients whose surgical wounds were closed with intradermal suture using different suturing materials according to which the patients were divided into two groups: absorbable - Monocryle (32) and non-absorbable - DemeLENE suture (32). POSAS scale and an ultrasound machine were used to assess the scars. The doctor and the patient evaluated seven parameters on two occasions, after 2 and 6 weeks after the surgery. RESULTS: The statistically significant advantage was found after 2 weeks in scars sewn with non-resorptive suture in terms of elasticity, doctor's general impression, pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and patient's general impression. After 6 weeks, statistically significantly better results were shown on scars sewn with non-resorptive thread for the parameters doctor's general impression, itching, irregularity, and patient's general impression. CONCLUSIONS: Non-resorptive sutures show statistically significantly better results, especially after 2 weeks from the patient's point of view so we consider them more comfortable and convenient to use.

No difference in prevalence of postoperative iliopsoas tendinitis in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery when using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture for capsular closure.

PURPOSE: The volume of arthroscopic hip surgery has increased dramatically in recent years with iliopsoas tendinitis (IPT) being one of the most common complications of this procedure. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of post-operative IPT in patients who undergo arthroscopic hip surgery with capsular closure using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture. METHODS: This is a single center, single surgeon, retrospective analysis performed between August 2007 and May 2023 comparing two cohorts who underwent hip arthroscopy. Patients were divided into those who underwent surgery with capsular closure using absorbable (Vicryl®, Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) suture and those who underwent capsular closure with non-absorbable suture (Suturetape, Arthrex, Naples FL). All patients who underwent primary or revision hip arthroscopy and were at least 2 months post-operation were initially included in the study. RESULTS: Between August 2007 and May 2023 a total of 1513 hip arthroscopy surgeries were performed. Within this cohort, 1421 hips underwent hip arthroscopy with non-absorbable suture and 64 hips underwent surgery with absorbable suture. There was no significant difference between the proportion of IPT in the non-absorbable cohort (2.3%) versus the absorbable cohort (1.6%) (P = 0.669). CONCLUSION: Capsular closure with Absorbable sutures was non-inferior to capsular closure with non-absorbable sutures with respect to the proportion of post-operative IPT following hip arthroscopy for FAI. Additionally, the proportion of post-operative IPT was found to be significantly higher in patients undergoing revision versus primary hip arthroscopy, regardless of capsular closure suture type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Trigger Finger Release: Are Sutures Requiring Removal Necessary?

Purpose: There is no consensus regarding optimal closure for trigger finger release (TFR) surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the number of postoperative visits and complications following TFR closure with nonabsorbable sutures versus those following TFR closure with absorbable sutures and skin glue. The hypothesis was that wound closure with absorbable sutures and glue will result in fewer postoperative visits, while having similar complication rates as that with nonabsorbable sutures. Methods: A retrospective review identified all patients undergoing open TFR over a 3-year period performed by two hand surgery fellowship-trained hand surgeons who adhered to an identical surgical protocol except for incisional closure. Patients were divided into two groups: a control group with nonabsorbable 4-0 monofilament sutures requiring removal ("suture" group) and a study group with buried absorbable 4-0 monofilament sutures not requiring removal as well as skin glue ("glue" group). The data collected included age, sex, number of postoperative visits, wound complications, infections, antibiotic use, prescribed hand therapy, hospital admission, and reoperation. Results: A total of 305 open TFR surgeries in 278 patients were included in the study, with 155 digits in the "suture" group and 150 in the "glue" group. Both groups were similar in age and sex. The "suture" group had significantly more total postoperative visits (185 vs 42, respectively, P < .001) and postoperative visits within the first 2 weeks (155 vs 10, respectively, P < .001) than the "glue" group. Additional postoperative visits beyond 2 weeks of surgery were similar between the two groups. Three (1.9%) patients in the "suture" group and two (1.3%) patients in the "glue" group developed a superficial surgical site infection within 30 days after surgery. Neither had deep infections requiring hospitalization or reoperation. Both groups required similar rates of postoperative hand therapy. Conclusions: Absorbable sutures afford fewer postoperative visits while having a similar complication rate as nonabsorbable sutures requiring removal. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures in A1 Pulley Release.

BACKGROUND: Both absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures are used to correct palmar incisions or lacerations. Nonabsorbable sutures have been used without complications but require removal at a follow-up appointment. Alternatively, the use of absorbable sutures has increased in popularity as postoperative suture removal is not required but is associated with local immunological and inflammatory responses. In this study, we compared the scar quality and outcomes of nonabsorbable and absorbable sutures in A1 pulley release. METHODS: Patients who underwent A1 pulley release were randomized to 1 of 2 suture materials. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale, Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Visual Analogue Scale, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Among the 41 patients included in the study, 23 were randomized to the nonabsorbable suture group, and 18 to the absorbable suture group. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two suture groups in the aforementioned assessments. Complication rates were higher in the nonabsorbable suture group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Notably, 1 case in the absorbable suture group had uncontrolled postoperative bleeding and required reoperation. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference between the two materials in terms of the Patient or Observer Scar Assessment Scales, overall complication rates, symptom scores, or pain scores. Therefore, the choice using absorbable or nonabsorbable can be guided by other factors such as physician or patient preference, availability, and cost.

Bioinspired, Robust, and Absorbable Cellulose Nanofibrils/Chitosan Filament with Remarkable Cytocompatibility and Wound Healing Properties.

Surgical threads are of great importance to prevent wound infection and accelerate tissue healing in surgical treatment. Cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and chitosan (CS) are attracting increasing attention to be employed as biomedicine materials due to their nontoxicity, cytocompatibility, and biodegradability. However, a robust and absorbable cellulose-based surgical thread has not been explored. Therefore, in this work, a bioinspired CNF/CS composite thread containing 5% cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) by the mass of CS was prepared, and the obtained CNF/CS-5C thread exhibited excellent mechanical properties and low swelling ratio in water due to the high cross-link degree. Especially, the tensile strength (1877 ± 107 MPa) of this thread was much higher than that of most reported CNF-based threads. Meanwhile, compared with commercial silk and Vicryl surgical threads, the CNF/CS-5C thread exhibited better in vitro cytocompatibility toward endothelial and fibroblast cells and lower inflammatory response in vivo to subcutaneous tissues of rats. In addition, the obtained thread could be regarded as a promising absorbable suture, which exhibited excellent wound healing performances in vivo. Therefore, the prepared absorbable thread will open a new window to prepare novel and advanced cellulose-based threads for medical applications.

[Risk Analysis and Study of Post-marketing Adverse Events for Absorbable Sutures].

Objective To investigate, analyze, and evaluate the risk data associated with the clinical use of absorbable sutures by retrieving and summarizing information from the databases of the US FDA and CNKI, as well as the adverse event reports related to absorbable sutures from January 2019 to October 2022 within Zhejiang province. The adverse event reports are obtained from both incident locations and monitoring organizations affiliated with the registrant. The aim is to identify the main risk factors associated with the clinical use of absorbable sutures. The key risk factors are potential product quality defects, product design and material selection, clinical selection and application, and postoperative recovery care including patient's self-care. Risk control strategies are further proposed to reduce or minimize the risk of adverse events caused by this product.

A Randomized, Single-Blind Study Comparing the Clinical Equivalence of Truglyde Fast® and Safil Quick® Polyglycolic Acid Fast-Absorbing Sutures for Episiotomy Repair Following Vaginal Delivery.

INTRODUCTION: Episiotomy, the deliberate surgical incision on the vaginal orifice during vaginal delivery, requires prompt repairing of the incised tissue. It may be associated with bleeding, infection, dehiscence, dyspareunia, short-term pain, and prolonged hospital stay. The outcome of surgery depends on the suture material and technique to repair the episiotomy. OBJECTIVE: We aim to subjectively assess perineal pain and maternal morbidity following episiotomy repair with Truglyde Fast® (Healthium Medtech Limited, Bengaluru, India) and Safil Quick® (B. Braun Medical Private Limited, Mumbai, India) polyglycolic acid fast-absorbing suture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicentric, prospective, randomized (1:1), two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind study was started in August 2020 and completed in March 2021. Ninety-nine primiparous or multiparous eligible women requiring episiotomy were recruited to Truglyde Fast® (n=51) and Safil Quick® (n=48) groups. The primary outcome measure was post-episiotomy perineal pain to be assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included evaluation of local anesthesia (quantity), intraoperative suture handling, number of sutures utilized, time spent for episiotomy repair and complete healing, analgesic number and dosage, early and late wound complications, presence of residual suture and frequency of re-suturing, resumption of sexual activity and dyspareunia, and adverse events. The threshold to discriminate significant from non-significant outcomes was p<0.05. RESULTS: At all visits, a non-significant change in perineal pain was noted between Truglyde Fast® and Safil Quick® groups. A significant difference (p<0.05) in the number of sutures used and intraoperative handling characteristics was observed between thegroups. Results of other secondary endpoints showed non-significant differences. CONCLUSION: Truglyde Fast® and Safil Quick® polyglycolic acid fast-absorbing sutures are clinically equivalent. Both sutures are safe and effective for episiotomy repair following vaginal delivery with minimal perineal pain and risk of maternal morbidity.

Absorbable Sutures and Telemedicine for Patients Undergoing Trigger Finger Release.

Background In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of care processes that reduce the need for in-person clinic visits while maintaining low complication rates is needed. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of patients undergoing trigger finger release with various suture and follow-up visit types to assess the feasibility of shifting towards telemedicine-based follow-up protocols. Methods A retrospective review of 329 patients undergoing trigger finger release was performed. Patients were classified based on whether or not they received in-office follow-ups; whether they received absorbable or non-absorbable sutures; and whether they were treated using a telemedicine and absorbable suture protocol or other combination of sutures and follow-ups. Univariate statistics were performed to compare outcomes between groups. Results Patients who did not undergo in-office follow-up were more likely to experience residual stiffness or contracture (11.4% vs. 4.1%; p=0.033) but had no significant differences in 30-day reoperation, emergency department (ED) returns, wound complaints, and Quick DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores. When comparing chromic absorbable sutures to non-absorbable sutures, those with absorbable sutures were significantly more likely to have telemedicine visits but were also more likely to have wound complaints (17.9% vs. 8.5%; p=0.022). There was no significant difference in two- and six-week pain scores, 30-day reoperation, ED returns, residual symptoms, and Quick DASH scores. When comparing patients treated using the absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol with those receiving any other type of suture and postoperative follow-up, no significant differences in any postoperative clinical outcome measures were observed. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the use of an absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol for patients undergoing trigger finger release yields similar outcomes as traditional methods of care. However, the use of absorbable sutures may result in decreased patient satisfaction with surgical wound healing.

Comparison of Craniosynostosis Surgery Outcomes Using Resorbable Plates and Screws versus Absorbable Sutures in Children with Craniosynostosis.

Background: Previously, absorbable screw and plate systems were widely used in craniosynostosis surgery in Iran, but now, due to the establishment of economic sanctions, the importation of these tools into the country has become difficult. In this study, we compared the short-term complications of cranioplasty surgery in craniosynostosis using absorbable plate screws with absorbable sutures. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 47 patients with a history of craniosynostosis who underwent cranioplasty at Tehran Mofid Hospital, Tehran, Iran from 2018 to 2021 were divided into two groups. For first group (31 patients) we used absorbable plate and screws, and for the second group (16 patients) absorbable sutures (PDS). All operations in both groups were performed by the identical surgical team. Patients followed up for consecutive post-operative examinations in the first and second weeks and 1, 3, and 6 months. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 25. Results: The results did not show any short-term or medium-term complications in either group. No recurrences were observed. In Whittaker classification, 63.8% were Class I, 29.8% were Class II, 6.4% were Class III, and 0% were Class IV. There was no statistically significant relationship between the type of treatment (screw and plate or absorbable suture) and higher Whitaker. There was also no statistically significant relationship between type of craniosynostosis and higher Whittaker. Conclusion: The absorbable sutures can be considered as valuable and cost-effective tools in the fixation of bone fragments in craniosynostosis surgeries by surgeons.

Percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable suture: Outcomes and complications / Reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con sutura reabsorbible: resultados y complicaciones

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures. Material and methods: A prospective cohort study including patients treated for an achilles tendon rupture from January 2016 to March 2019 was conducted. Inclusion criteria: ≥18 years of age, non-insertional (2–8cm proximal to insertion) achilles tendon ruptures. Open or partial ruptures were excluded. The diagnosis was based on clinical criteria and confirmed by ultrasonography in all patients. Epidemiological data, rupture and healing risk factors, previous diagnosis of tendinopathy, pre-rupture sport activity, job information, mechanism of rupture and the time in days between lesion and surgery were collected. Patients were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) at the 1, 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up. The achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) were assessed at the 6 and 12 month follow-up. Ultrasound was performed at the 6-month follow-up. The re-rupture rate and postoperative complications were also collected. Conclusions: In our experience, percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures in patients with an acute achilles tendon rupture has shown good functional results but with a high incidence of complications. Although most complications were transitory sural nerve symptoms, this complication would be avoided in patients treated conservatively. For this reason, conservative treatment associated with an early weightbearing rehabilitation protocol should be considered a viable option for patients with achilles tendon ruptures, mainly in cooperative young patients.(AU)

Objetivo: El propósito de este estudio es evaluar los resultados clínicos y las complicaciones de la reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con suturas reabsorbibles. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte prospectivo que incluye pacientes tratados por una rotura del tendón de Aquiles desde enero de 2016 hasta marzo de 2019. Criterios de inclusión: ≥18años de edad, roturas del tendón de Aquiles no insercionales (de 2 a 8cm proximales a la inserción). Se excluyeron roturas abiertas o parciales. El diagnóstico se basó en criterios clínicos y se confirmó mediante ecografía en todos los pacientes. Se recogieron datos epidemiológicos, factores de riesgo de rotura y cicatrización, diagnóstico previo de tendinopatía, actividad deportiva previa a la rotura, información laboral, mecanismo de rotura y tiempo en días entre la lesión y la cirugía. Los pacientes fueron evaluados utilizando la escala analógica visual (VAS) en el seguimiento de 1, 3, 6 y 12meses. La puntuación de rotura del tendón de Aquiles (ATRS) se evaluó a los 6 y 12meses de seguimiento. La ecografía se realizó a los 6meses de seguimiento. También se recogieron la tasa de re-ruptura y las complicaciones postoperatorias. Conclusiones: En nuestra experiencia, la reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con suturas reabsorbibles en pacientes con rotura aguda del tendón de Aquiles ha mostrado buenos resultados funcionales pero con una alta incidencia de complicaciones. Aunque la mayoría de las complicaciones fueron síntomas transitorios del nervio sural, esta complicación se evitaría en pacientes tratados de forma conservadora. Por esta razón, el tratamiento conservador asociado a un protocolo de rehabilitación con carga temprana debe considerarse una opción viable para pacientes con roturas del tendón de Aquiles, principalmente en pacientes jóvenes colaboradores.(AU)

Reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con sutura reabsorbible: resultados y complicaciones / Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable suture: Outcomes and complications

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures. Material and methods: A prospective cohort study including patients treated for an achilles tendon rupture from January 2016 to March 2019 was conducted. Inclusion criteria: ≥18 years of age, non-insertional (2–8cm proximal to insertion) achilles tendon ruptures. Open or partial ruptures were excluded. The diagnosis was based on clinical criteria and confirmed by ultrasonography in all patients. Epidemiological data, rupture and healing risk factors, previous diagnosis of tendinopathy, pre-rupture sport activity, job information, mechanism of rupture and the time in days between lesion and surgery were collected. Patients were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) at the 1, 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up. The achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) were assessed at the 6 and 12 month follow-up. Ultrasound was performed at the 6-month follow-up. The re-rupture rate and postoperative complications were also collected. Conclusions: In our experience, percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures in patients with an acute achilles tendon rupture has shown good functional results but with a high incidence of complications. Although most complications were transitory sural nerve symptoms, this complication would be avoided in patients treated conservatively. For this reason, conservative treatment associated with an early weightbearing rehabilitation protocol should be considered a viable option for patients with achilles tendon ruptures, mainly in cooperative young patients.(AU)

Objetivo: El propósito de este estudio es evaluar los resultados clínicos y las complicaciones de la reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con suturas reabsorbibles. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte prospectivo que incluye pacientes tratados por una rotura del tendón de Aquiles desde enero de 2016 hasta marzo de 2019. Criterios de inclusión: ≥18años de edad, roturas del tendón de Aquiles no insercionales (de 2 a 8cm proximales a la inserción). Se excluyeron roturas abiertas o parciales. El diagnóstico se basó en criterios clínicos y se confirmó mediante ecografía en todos los pacientes. Se recogieron datos epidemiológicos, factores de riesgo de rotura y cicatrización, diagnóstico previo de tendinopatía, actividad deportiva previa a la rotura, información laboral, mecanismo de rotura y tiempo en días entre la lesión y la cirugía. Los pacientes fueron evaluados utilizando la escala analógica visual (VAS) en el seguimiento de 1, 3, 6 y 12meses. La puntuación de rotura del tendón de Aquiles (ATRS) se evaluó a los 6 y 12meses de seguimiento. La ecografía se realizó a los 6meses de seguimiento. También se recogieron la tasa de re-ruptura y las complicaciones postoperatorias. Conclusiones: En nuestra experiencia, la reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con suturas reabsorbibles en pacientes con rotura aguda del tendón de Aquiles ha mostrado buenos resultados funcionales pero con una alta incidencia de complicaciones. Aunque la mayoría de las complicaciones fueron síntomas transitorios del nervio sural, esta complicación se evitaría en pacientes tratados de forma conservadora. Por esta razón, el tratamiento conservador asociado a un protocolo de rehabilitación con carga temprana debe considerarse una opción viable para pacientes con roturas del tendón de Aquiles, principalmente en pacientes jóvenes colaboradores.(AU)

Comparison between micro-anchor skin dressing and liquid bonding agent for elective knee arthroscopy portal closure.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to evaluate outcomes of elective knee arthroscopy portal closure comparing two skin closure techniques. METHOD: This was a randomised controlled trial including healthy volunteers aged ≥18 years undergoing elective knee arthroscopy that used two portals. At the time of surgery, each patient's two arthroscopy portal closures were randomised to one of two closure techniques; the first technique used approximation of the skin with a micro-anchor skin dressing (BandGrip Inc., US), while the second closure technique used an absorbable suture (Biosyn Monofilament, Medtronic) and a liquid bonding agent skin closure (Dermabond, Ethicon Inc., US). Postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at the first visit after knee arthroscopy and at six weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients (76 portals) were enrolled in this study. No patients reported wound complications of either portal; thus, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in wound complication rates between the skin closure techniques. Survey questions regarding any difference in appearance and cosmesis between the closure techniques' portal sites were responded to by 15 patients, all of whom indicated no difference in appearance between the portal sites. There was also no statistically significant difference between the two closure techniques with regards to appearance. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in presence of wound complications or appearance between skin closure with the micro-anchor skin dressing and the absorbable suture/liquid bonding agent skin closure.

Establishing Methods of Defect Closure in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: an International Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Internal herniation (IH) can be a life-threatening complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Randomised controlled trials support the routine closure of mesenteric spaces at RYGB. However, there is currently no consensus on the method of closure in clinical practice. The purpose of this survey is to understand bariatric surgeons' practice in this regard. METHODS: We conducted an international survey, whereby questions were created through collaboration of a consensus group of bariatric surgeons and hosted on the SurveyMonkey platform. The survey was distributed among British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society (BOMSS) members and international professional channels including The Upper Gastrointestinal Society (TUGS) and social media. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six surgeons from 34 countries completed the survey. Of these, 49 respondents were UK-based surgeons with a cumulative experience of approximately 2500 RYGB per annum. Forty-five (91.8%) respondents reported always closing mesenteric defects, of whom 57.8% elected to use non-absorbable non-barbed sutures, followed by staples/clips in 28.9% and a selection of other methods. Most respondents used more than one method. A total of 2 UK and 14 non-UK participants reported never closing mesenteric spaces. CONCLUSIONS: This survey has shown heterogeneity among defect closure and no consensus on preferred type. Additionally, there remains a practice of non-closure of mesenteric defects. We hope these findings help to inform further needed research and consensus building among experts.

Comparative study of absorbable suture and permanent suture in sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical results and the complications of absorbable suture (AS) versus permanent suture (PS) in sacrocolpopexy (SCP). METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles in which researchers compared AS with PS in SCP. The primary outcomes were the surgical success rate and suture-related complications (suture exposure/erosion, mesh erosion, and suture removal). All analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Four articles involving 689 patients were ultimately included. Our findings demonstrated that AS had similar surgical success rates to those of PS (OR=1.34; 95% CI, 0.60-2.96) and no significant differences in failure rates were noted between the two groups (OR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.34-1.66). Subgroup analyses in patients with anatomical failure revealed no significant differences in recurrent posterior prolapse (OR=0.33; 95% CI, 0.05-2.10) or in recurrent apical (OR=0.64; 95% CI, 0.03-13.66) or anterior prolapse (OR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.13-1.57). However, the AS group were at a lower risk of suture exposure/erosion (OR=0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.58) and a lower suture removal rate (OR=0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.61) and retreatment (OR=0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.82), but the mesh erosion was not significantly different (OR=1.00; 95% CI, 0.49-2.08). CONCLUSIONS: The data showed that AS had a similar success rate, less exposure/erosion, and were less likely to be removed and require retreatment than PS, which supported the notion that AS is as effective as PS but safer.

Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable suture: Outcomes and complications / Reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con sutura reabsorbible: resultados y complicaciones

Background and objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures. Material and methods: Prospective cohort study including 52 patients treated for Achilles tendon ruptures (January 2016 to March 2019). Inclusion criteria: ≥18 years of age, non-insertional Achilles tendon ruptures. Diagnosis based on clinical criteria, confirmed by ultrasonography. Assessment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) and ultrasound. Re-rupture rate and postoperative complications were collected. Results: VAS scoring (SD) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up (FU) were 2.63 (0.83), 1.79 (1.25), 0.69 (1.09) and 0.08 (0.39), respectively. Mean (SD) ATRS score was 92.45 points at 6 months (6.27) and 94.04 points at 12 months FU (4.59). Three re-ruptures (5.77%) occurred with a mean time between surgery and re-rupture of 108.75 days (SD 28.4), all of them within 4-month FU. No ruptures at the time to return to sports activity. Thirteen complications (25%) (3 re-ruptures, 1 superficial wound infection and 9 transitory sural nerve injuries). Conclusions: Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures in patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures has shown good functional results but with a high incidence of complications. Although most complications were transitory sural nerve symptoms, these would be avoided with conservative treatment. Conservative treatment associated with an early weight-bearing rehabilitation protocol should be considered a viable option for patients with Achilles tendon ruptures, specially in cooperative young patients.(AU)

Antecedentes y objetivo: El propósito es evaluar los resultados clínicos y complicaciones de la reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con suturas reabsorbibles. Material y métodos: Estudio de cohorte prospectivo incluyendo 52 pacientes tratados por rotura del tendón de Aquiles (enero 2016-marzo 2019). Criterios de inclusión: ≥18 años de edad, roturas no insercionales del tendón de Aquiles. Diagnóstico clínico y confirmado por ecografía. Evaluación mediante Escala Analógica Visual (EVA), puntuación de rotura del tendón de Aquiles (ATRS) y ecografía. Recopilación de tasas de re-rotura y complicaciones postoperatorias. Resultados: Puntuación EVA (DE) al mes, 3, 6 y 12 meses de seguimiento: 2,63 (0,83), 1,79 (1,25), 0,69 (1,09) y 0,08 (0,39). Media (DE) de la puntuación ATRS: 92,45 puntos a los 6 meses (6,27) y 94,04 puntos a los 12 meses (4,59). 3 re-roturas (5,77%) con tiempo medio entre cirugía y re-rotura de 108,75 días (DE 28,4), todas durante los 4 meses de seguimiento. No roturas a la reincorporación a la actividad deportiva. 13 complicaciones (25%) (3 re-roturas, 1 infección de herida superficial y 9 lesiones transitorias del nervio sural). Conclusiones: La reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con suturas reabsorbibles en pacientes con rotura aguda del tendón de Aquiles muestra buenos resultados funcionales; con alta incidencia de complicaciones. La mayoría de complicaciones fueron síntomas transitorios del nervio sural, que se evitarían en pacientes tratados conservadoramente. Asociado a un protocolo temprano de rehabilitación con carga, debe considerarse una opción, especialmente en pacientes jóvenes cooperadores.(AU)

[Artículo traducido] Reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con sutura reabsorbible: resultados y complicaciones / Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable suture: Outcomes and complications

Antecedentes y objetivo: El propósito es evaluar los resultados clínicos y complicaciones de la reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con suturas reabsorbibles. Material y métodos: Estudio de cohorte prospectivo incluyendo 52 pacientes tratados por rotura del tendón de Aquiles (enero 2016-marzo 2019). Criterios de inclusión: ≥18 años de edad, roturas no insercionales del tendón de Aquiles. Diagnóstico clínico y confirmado por ecografía. Evaluación mediante Escala Analógica Visual (EVA), puntuación de rotura del tendón de Aquiles (ATRS) y ecografía. Recopilación de tasas de re-rotura y complicaciones postoperatorias. Resultados: Puntuación EVA (DE) al mes, 3, 6 y 12 meses de seguimiento: 2,63 (0,83), 1,79 (1,25), 0,69 (1,09) y 0,08 (0,39). Media (DE) de la puntuación ATRS: 92,45 puntos a los 6 meses (6,27) y 94,04 puntos a los 12 meses (4,59). 3 re-roturas (5,77%) con tiempo medio entre cirugía y re-rotura de 108,75 días (DE 28,4), todas durante los 4 meses de seguimiento. No roturas a la reincorporación a la actividad deportiva. 13 complicaciones (25%) (3 re-roturas, 1 infección de herida superficial y 9 lesiones transitorias del nervio sural). Conclusiones: La reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con suturas reabsorbibles en pacientes con rotura aguda del tendón de Aquiles muestra buenos resultados funcionales; con alta incidencia de complicaciones. La mayoría de complicaciones fueron síntomas transitorios del nervio sural, que se evitarían en pacientes tratados conservadoramente. Asociado a un protocolo temprano de rehabilitación con carga, debe considerarse una opción, especialmente en pacientes jóvenes cooperadores.(AU)

Background and objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures. Material and methods: Prospective cohort study including 52 patients treated for Achilles tendon ruptures (January 2016 to March 2019). Inclusion criteria: ≥18 years of age, non-insertional Achilles tendon ruptures. Diagnosis based on clinical criteria, confirmed by ultrasonography. Assessment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) and ultrasound. Re-rupture rate and postoperative complications were collected. Results: VAS scoring (SD) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up (FU) were 2.63 (0.83), 1.79 (1.25), 0.69 (1.09) and 0.08 (0.39), respectively. Mean (SD) ATRS score was 92.45 points at 6 months (6.27) and 94.04 points at 12 months FU (4.59). Three re-ruptures (5.77%) occurred with a mean time between surgery and re-rupture of 108.75 days (SD 28.4), all of them within 4-month FU. No ruptures at the time to return to sports activity. Thirteen complications (25%) (3 re-ruptures, 1 superficial wound infection and 9 transitory sural nerve injuries). Conclusions: Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures in patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures has shown good functional results but with a high incidence of complications. Although most complications were transitory sural nerve symptoms, these would be avoided with conservative treatment. Conservative treatment associated with an early weight-bearing rehabilitation protocol should be considered a viable option for patients with Achilles tendon ruptures, specially in cooperative young patients.(AU)

Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable suture: Outcomes and complications. / [Artículo traducido] Reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con sutura reabsorbible: resultados y complicaciones.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study including 52 patients treated for Achilles tendon ruptures (January 2016 to March 2019). INCLUSION CRITERIA: ≥18 years of age, non-insertional Achilles tendon ruptures. Diagnosis based on clinical criteria, confirmed by ultrasonography. Assessment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) and ultrasound. Re-rupture rate and postoperative complications were collected. RESULTS: VAS scoring (SD) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up (FU) were 2.63 (0.83), 1.79 (1.25), 0.69 (1.09) and 0.08 (0.39), respectively. Mean (SD) ATRS score was 92.45 points at 6 months (6.27) and 94.04 points at 12 months FU (4.59). Three re-ruptures (5.77%) occurred with a mean time between surgery and re-rupture of 108.75 days (SD 28.4), all of them within 4-month FU. No ruptures at the time to return to sports activity. Thirteen complications (25%) (3 re-ruptures, 1 superficial wound infection and 9 transitory sural nerve injuries). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures in patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures has shown good functional results but with a high incidence of complications. Although most complications were transitory sural nerve symptoms, these would be avoided with conservative treatment. Conservative treatment associated with an early weight-bearing rehabilitation protocol should be considered a viable option for patients with Achilles tendon ruptures, specially in cooperative young patients.

Percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable suture: Outcomes and complications.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study including patients treated for an achilles tendon rupture from January 2016 to March 2019 was conducted. INCLUSION CRITERIA: ≥18 years of age, non-insertional (2-8cm proximal to insertion) achilles tendon ruptures. Open or partial ruptures were excluded. The diagnosis was based on clinical criteria and confirmed by ultrasonography in all patients. Epidemiological data, rupture and healing risk factors, previous diagnosis of tendinopathy, pre-rupture sport activity, job information, mechanism of rupture and the time in days between lesion and surgery were collected. Patients were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) at the 1, 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up. The achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) were assessed at the 6 and 12 month follow-up. Ultrasound was performed at the 6-month follow-up. The re-rupture rate and postoperative complications were also collected. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures in patients with an acute achilles tendon rupture has shown good functional results but with a high incidence of complications. Although most complications were transitory sural nerve symptoms, this complication would be avoided in patients treated conservatively. For this reason, conservative treatment associated with an early weightbearing rehabilitation protocol should be considered a viable option for patients with achilles tendon ruptures, mainly in cooperative young patients.

Percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable suture: Outcomes and complications. / Reparación percutánea del tendón de Aquiles con sutura reabsorbible: resultados y complicaciones.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study including patients treated for an achilles tendon rupture from January 2016 to March 2019 was conducted. INCLUSION CRITERIA: ≥18 years of age, non-insertional (2-8cm proximal to insertion) achilles tendon ruptures. Open or partial ruptures were excluded. The diagnosis was based on clinical criteria and confirmed by ultrasonography in all patients. Epidemiological data, rupture and healing risk factors, previous diagnosis of tendinopathy, pre-rupture sport activity, job information, mechanism of rupture and the time in days between lesion and surgery were collected. Patients were assessed using visual analogue scale at the 1, 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up. The achilles tendon rupture score were assessed at the 6 and 12 month follow-up. Ultrasound was performed at the 6-month follow-up. The re-rupture rate and postoperative complications were also collected. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, percutaneous achilles tendon repair with absorbable sutures in patients with an acute achilles tendon rupture has shown good functional results but with a high incidence of complications. Although most complications were transitory sural nerve symptoms, this complication would be avoided in patients treated conservatively. For this reason, conservative treatment associated with an early weightbearing rehabilitation protocol should be considered a viable option for patients with achilles tendon ruptures, mainly in cooperative young patients.

Absorbable suture knots on the supraspinatus tendon prevent adverse effects of nonabsorbable suture knots in a rat model.

PURPOSE: To compare the absorbable and nonabsorbable suture knots on the tendon on bone-to-tendon healing during the early phase in a rat rotator cuff tear (RCT) model. METHODS: Fifty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats (10 weeks old; mean weight, 380 g) were used in this study, and 51 of them were randomly assigned into three groups: absorbable suture group (ASG, n = 22), nonabsorbable suture group (NSG, n = 22), and sham surgery group (SSG, n = 7), and the remaining rat was used to take surgical pictures. Bilateral supraspinatus tendon tears were created and repaired immediately in ASG and NSG. Three rats from ASG and NSG were killed for Western blot and histological evaluation at 3 days, 1 week, and 4 weeks after surgery. At 4 weeks, four rats from each group were killed for biomechanical test, and three rats from SSG were used for histological evaluation. RESULTS: Absorbable suture knots on the tendon completely degraded at 4 weeks. However, nonabsorbable suture knots remained intact between the tendon and articular side. ASG showed a stronger inflammatory reaction at 3 days and 1 week, but a weaker reaction at 4 weeks as confirmed by gross observation and Western blot. Besides, ASG showed superior biomechanical properties in terms of maximum load to failure and stiffness at 4 weeks. Modified Bonar score revealed superior maturity for tissue healing in ASG to that in NSG at 4 weeks. Furthermore, inferior bone-to-tendon interface and weakest link formation were observed in NSG on histologic images. CONCLUSION: Absorbable suture knots on the tendon contributed to better mechanical properties compared with the nonabsorbable one after rotator cuff repair.