Validation of the EKFC equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation and comparison with the Asian-modified CKD-EPI equation in Chinese chronic kidney disease patients in an external study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine whether new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation is more applicable than Asian-modified CKD-EPI equation in clinical practice, having a higher accuracy in estimating GFR in our external CKD population. METHODS: We calculated estimated GFREKFC and GFRCKD-EPI independently using the EKFC and Asian-modified CKD-EPI formulas, respectively. The clinical diagnostic performance of the two equations was assessed and compared by median bias, precision, accuracy (P30) and so on, using 99mTc-DTPA dual plasma sample clearance method as a reference method for GFR measurement (mGFR). The equation that met the following targets was superior: (1) median bias within ± 3 mL/min/1.73 m2; (2) P30 > 75%; and (3) better precision and 95% limits of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Totally, 160 CKD patients were recruited in our external cohort. GFREKFC was highly related to mGFR, with a regression equation of GFREKFC=mGFR × 0.87 + 5.27. Compared with the Asian-modified CKD-EPI equation, EKFC equation demonstrated a wider median bias (-1.64 vs. 0.84 mL/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.01) that was within 3 mL/min/1.73 m2 and not clinically meaningful. Furthermore, the precision (12.69 vs. 12.72 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.42), 95% limits of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (42.4 vs. 44.4 mL/min/1.73 m2) and incorrect reclassification index of the two target equations were almost identical. Although, EKFC equation had a slightly better P30 (80.0% vs. 74.4%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of EKFC equation is acceptable. There is no clinically meaningful difference in the performance of the Asian-modified CKD-EPI and EKFC equations within the limits imposed by the small sample size.

The Xiangya equation could not replace the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation in estimating glomerular filtration rate in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical practicability of the Xiangya equation in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and compare with the Asian modified Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, assessing whether the Xiangya equation could replace the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation as the preferred method for predicting GFR in the Chinese CKD patients in an external validation study. METHODS: The GFR was determined simultaneously by two methods: (a) the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation (GFRCKD-EPI); (b) the Xiangya equation (GFRXiangya); diagnostic performance of the two models was compared by the regression analysis, the Bland-Altman plot, bias, precision and P30 under the background of 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) dual plasma sample clearance method as reference method for GFR measurement (mGFR). RESULTS: A total of 158 Chinese CKD patients were included in our external study. The GFRXiangya was highly related with mGFR, with the correlation coefficient of 0.92. The regression equation was GFRXiangya = 0.55*mGFR + 28.25, where the regression coefficient was far away from one and the intercept was wide. Compared with the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation, the performance of the Xiangya equation demonstrated a poorer bias (9.5 vs - 3.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.001), an inferior precision (23.9 vs 13.0 ml/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.001), a lower P30 (51.3% vs 73.4%, P < 0.001) and a wider 95% limit of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (65.0 vs 44.9 ml/min/1.73 m2). CONCLUSION: Due to relatively inferior performance, the Xiangya equation could not replace the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation in estimating GFR in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease in our external cohort.

The ensemble learning model is not better than the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese CKD patients in the external validation study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical practicability of the ensemble learning model established by Liu et al. in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and validate whether it is a better model than the Asian modified Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in a cohort of Chinese chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in an external validation study. METHODS: According to the ensemble learning model and the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation, we calculated estimated GFRensemble and GFRCKD-EPI, separately. Diagnostic performance of the two models was assessed and compared by correlation coefficient, regression equation, Bland-Altman analysis, bias, precision and P30 under the premise of 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) dual plasma sample clearance method as reference method for GFR measurement (mGFR). RESULTS: A total of 158 Chinese CKD patients were included in our external validation study. The GFRensemble was highly related with mGFR, with the correlation coefficient of 0.94. However, regression equation of GFRensemble = 0.66*mGFR + 23.05, the regression coefficient was far away from one, and the intercept was wide. Compared with the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation, the diagnostic performance of the ensemble learning model also demonstrated a wider 95% limit of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (52.6 vs 42.4 ml/min/1.73 m2), a poorer bias (8.0 vs 1.0 ml/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.02), an inferior precision (18.4 vs 12.7 ml/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.001) and a lower P30 (58.9% vs 74.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the ensemble learning model cannot replace the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for the first choice for GFR estimation in overall Chinese CKD patients.

Comparative performance of FAS equation and Asian modified CKD-EPI in the determination of GFR in Chinese patients with CKD with the 99mTc-DTPA plasma clearance as the reference method.

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a useful index in many clinical conditions. However, very few studies have assessed the performance of full age spectrum (FAS) equation and the Asian modified Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in the approximation of GFR in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the above two creatinine-based equations. METHODS: A well designed single-center cross-sectional study was performed and the GFR was determined by 3 methods separately in the same day: technetium-99m-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) dual plasma sample clearance method (mGFR); FAS equation method; Asian modified CKD-EPI equation method. The gold standard method was the mGFR. Equations performance criteria considered correlation coefficient, bias, precision, accuracy and the ability to detect the mGFR less than 60ml/min/1.73m2. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were enrolled. The diagnostic performance of FAS showed no significant difference in the correlation coefficient (0.89 vs 0.89), precision (15.9 vs 16.1ml/min/1.73m2), accuracy (75.0% vs 76.3%) and the ability to detect the mGFR less than 60ml/min/1.73m2 (0.94 vs 0.94) compared with the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation in all participants. The FAS showed a negative bias, while the new CKD-EPI equation showed a positive bias (-1.20 vs 1.30ml/min/1.73m2, P<0.001). However, they were all near to zero. In the mGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2 subgroup and mGFR>60ml/min/1.73m2 subgroup were consistent with that in the whole cohort. The precision and accuracy decreased when GFR>60ml/min/1.73m2 in both equations. CONCLUSIONS: The FAS equation and the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation had similar performance in determining the glomerular filtration rate in the Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. Both the FAS equation and Asian modified CKD-EPI can be a satisfactory method and may be the most suitable creatinine-based equation.

Comparative performance of FAS equation and Asian modified CKD-EPI in the determination of GFR in Chinese patients with CKD with the 99mTc-DTPA plasma clearance as the reference method.

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a useful index in many clinical conditions. However, very few studies have assessed the performance of full age spectrum (FAS) equation and the Asian modified Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in the approximation of GFR in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the above two creatinine-based equations. METHODS: A well designed single-center cross-sectional study was performed and the GFR was determined by 3 methods separately in the same day: technetium-99m-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) dual plasma sample clearance method (mGFR); FAS equation method; Asian modified CKD-EPI equation method. The gold standard method was the mGFR. Equations performance criteria considered correlation coefficient, bias, precision, accuracy and the ability to detect the mGFR less than 60ml/min/1.73m2. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were enrolled. The diagnostic performance of FAS showed no significant difference in the correlation coefficient (0.89 vs 0.89), precision (15.9 vs 16.1ml/min/1.73m2), accuracy (75.0% vs 76.3%) and the ability to detect the mGFR less than 60ml/min/1.73m2 (0.94 vs 0.94) compared with the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation in all participants. The FAS showed a negative bias, while the new CKD-EPI equation showed a positive bias (-1.20 vs 1.30ml/min/1.73m2, P<0.001). However, they were all near to zero. In the mGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2 subgroup and mGFR>60ml/min/1.73m2 subgroup were consistent with that in the whole cohort. The precision and accuracy decreased when GFR>60ml/min/1.73m2 in both equations. CONCLUSIONS: The FAS equation and the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation had similar performance in determining the glomerular filtration rate in the Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. Both the FAS equation and Asian modified CKD-EPI can be a satisfactory method and may be the most suitable creatinine-based equation.