Uncovering the effects of pandemic conditions on hearing aid experiences: a dual perspective from audiologists and hearing aid users.

Purpose: This study examines the effects of the pandemic on hearing aid experiences from the perspectives of audiologists and patients, as well as communication challenges faced by both users and non-users of hearing aids.Materials and Methods: The study consisted of two phases: a longitudinal study examining the services provided by audiologists during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic and after the first vaccination dose. The second phase involved a survey of 120 elderly individuals with hearing loss, divided into hearing aid users and non-users for assessing communication challenges. Data was collected from comprehensive audiology clinics using a series of checklists.Results: Analysis of the frequency of services related to hearing aids revealed that during the peak period, the majority of visits were for acquiring batteries and hearing aids, while fewer visits were for fitting and fine-tuning the devices. After vaccination the pattern was changed. In the second phase, significant differences were observed between the hearing aid users and non-users with regards to their ability to comprehend speech while wearing mask, communicating at a safe distance, and following TV news.Conclusions: The distribution of requested services differed during the peak period and the post-vaccination period. There was a noticeable increase in the purchase and fitting of hearing aids after vaccination. However, patients encountered difficulties due to the limited availability of tele-audiology services and delayed services from hearing aid companies. The benefits of hearing aids were impacted by the pandemic as many people did not seek adjustments for their devices.

People who receive hearing aids without requiring further adjustments may experience difficulties in speech perception and auditory function in situations where communication barriers are increased, such as during a pandemic.The most significant challenge identified by audiologists is that people prefer in-person care. However, from the patients' perspective, the lack of tele-audiology services is the most important challenge for hearing health services. Therefore, it is crucial to focus on the development of tele-audiology in developing countries. Its implementation is as essential as training audiologists.The pandemic and its preventive measures have affected the benefits of using hearing aids, with many people not seeking the most effective adjustments in this condition.

Towards stem cell therapies for hearing loss: awareness and perspectives of Australian audiologists and their patients.

Aim: Over the last two decades, numerous experimental studies have examined the feasibility of delivering stem cells into the cochlea to restore hearing. While these studies have spawned new cell therapy companies, there is little information on what patients understand or expect from these emerging therapies.Methods: This study sought to understand the awareness and perspectives of Australian audiologists and their adult patients toward stem cell therapies for treating hearing loss.Results: An anonymous survey indicated 91% of patients and 39% of audiologists were unaware of these therapies being developed. Thirty percent of audiologists reported being asked about stem cell therapies for hearing loss, but 70% were not confident answering patient queries about this and were unsure where to gather information. Primary concerns reported by patients were cost (45%) and safety of treatment (42%). Interestingly, 58% of patients were unsure of how this therapy would improve their hearing, yet 25% of these patients expected that their hearing would return to normal.Conclusion: There was strong support for development of educational materials for both patient and clinician. The increasingly important role of audiologists in providing patient counselling was reflected in overwhelming support (from both patient and clinician) for audiologists providing such information.

In recent years, scientific studies have investigated the possibility of using stem cells to improve or restore hearing. Although some companies claim to be able use stem cell therapies to treat hearing loss now, there is currently not enough evidence to show these treatments are safe or effective. This study aimed to understand the awareness and perspectives of Australian audiologists and their adult patients toward stem cell therapies for hearing restoration. The study was conducted as a survey at an audiology clinic in Melbourne, Australia. The study found 91% of patients and 39% of audiologists were not aware of stem cell therapies for hearing loss. Although 30% of audiologists said they had been asked by a patient about stem cell therapies, 70% said they would not feel confident responding to a question from a patient. Primary patient concerns about stem cell therapies for hearing loss were cost (45%) and safety (42%). Most patients (57%) were unsure what stem cell therapies would do, but 25% expected that this treatment would return their hearing to normal. This study demonstrates the increasingly important role of audiologists in providing support to patients about future potential therapies for hearing loss, as reflected in overwhelming support (from both patient and clinician) for audiologists providing such information.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Australian allied hearing-healthcare professionals: survey on comorbid hearing loss and cognitive impairment.

Purpose: As hearing loss is a modifiable risk factor of dementia, allied hearing-healthcare professionals (AHHPs) frequently see older patients who are affected by both conditions. However, little is known about how well Australian AHHP's understand the complexities of providing care to patients with comorbid hearing loss and dementia, as well as their associated views and practices. Thus, the current study used a survey to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) of Australian AHHPs in managing comorbid patients. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional design was used, wherein a KAP survey was developed and distributed to eligible AHHPs via Qualtrics. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. Results: 101 Australian AHHPs met inclusion criteria (2.5% of approximately 4,000 invited AHHPs), and participated in the study. Although participants generally possessed a high level of knowledge for the association between hearing loss and cognitive impairment, their specific knowledge and practices in relation to cognitive screening tests and referral pathways was limited. Participants also expressed mostly positive attitudes towards their role in assisting patients with comorbid hearing loss and dementia. Furthermore, our results suggested that some KAPs relevant to comorbid patients differed based on sex, qualification, and ethnicity. Conclusion: This study identified gaps in the knowledge and practices of Australian AHHPs with regard to the complexities of addressing comorbid cognitive impairment and hearing loss. These findings will help to develop training programs to empower AHHPs to deliver optimal healthcare services to comorbid patients.

Risk of Hearing Loss in Neonates and Toddlers with in Utero Exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVE: Given the prevalence of neonatal hearing loss (HL) associated with intrauterine viral exposures, the goal of this study is to provide information on neonatal HL in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were drawn from the COVID-19 Mother Baby Outcomes (COMBO) Initiative. 1007 participants completed the newborn hearing screen as part of routine clinical care (COMBO-EHR cohort) and 555 completed the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) at 2 and/or 3 years of age for research purposes (COMBO-RSCH cohort). Maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection status during pregnancy was determined through electronic health records and maternal-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: In adjusted multivariate logistic regression models covarying for newborn age at assessment, mode of delivery, and gestational age at delivery, there was no significant association between intrauterine SARS-CoV-2 exposure and newborn hearing screening failure (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.39-2.42, p = 0.91) in the COMBO-EHR cohort. In the COMBO-RSCH cohort, there were similar non-significant associations between intrauterine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and maternal-reported concern for HL on the NSCH (OR = 1.19 [95% CI = 0.30-4.24], p = 0.79). CONCLUSION: There is no association between intrauterine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and failed hearing screen in neonates. Similarly, based on the NSCH, there is no association between intrauterine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and maternal-reported concern for hearing in toddlers. These results offer reassurance given the widespread nature of this pandemic with tens of millions of fetuses having a history of intrauterine exposure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

User Satisfaction with Primary Health Care Rehabilitation Services in a South African Metropolitan District.

Rehabilitation services are critical to improve health outcomes, particularly at community level within primary healthcare settings. As groups with an interest in the health system, rehabilitation service users' and caregivers' involvement in various aspects of health system strengthening is important for healthcare planning and evaluation. This study aimed to explore rehabilitation service users' perceptions of the rehabilitation services and their effect on their functioning in the Johannesburg Metropolitan District. A qualitative study was conducted using purposive sampling of participants attending rehabilitation at nine provincially funded clinics. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings revealed the theme of happy with rehabilitation services and five associated categories, namely (1) service provider actions, (2) service organisation, (3) service user actions, (4) service access, and (5) service outcomes. The participants expressed overall satisfaction with their experiences of rehabilitation services, highlighting the importance of effective communication, patient-centred care, strong therapeutic relationships, and active patient engagement to achieve positive outcomes. This study provides the evidence for maintaining and extending rehabilitation at the PHC level in support of the health policy changes proposed for South Africa.

The Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT) test: A clinical spectro-temporal modulation detection test.

Over the last decade, multiple studies have shown that hearing-impaired listeners' speech-in-noise reception ability, measured with audibility compensation, is closely associated with performance in spectro-temporal modulation (STM) detection tests. STM tests thus have the potential to provide highly relevant beyond-the-audiogram information in the clinic, but the available STM tests have not been optimized for clinical use in terms of test duration, required equipment, and procedural standardization. The present study introduces a quick-and-simple clinically viable STM test, named the Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT™) test. First, an experimenter-controlled STM measurement paradigm was developed, in which the patient is presented bilaterally with a continuous audibility-corrected noise via headphones and asked to press a pushbutton whenever they hear an STM target sound in the noise. The patient's threshold is established using a Hughson-Westlake tracking procedure with a three-out-of-five criterion and then refined by post-processing the collected data using a logistic function. Different stimulation paradigms were tested in 28 hearing-impaired participants and compared to data previously measured in the same participants with an established STM test paradigm. The best stimulation paradigm showed excellent test-retest reliability and good agreement with the established laboratory version. Second, the best stimulation paradigm with 1-second noise "waves" (windowed noise) was chosen, further optimized with respect to step size and logistic-function fitting, and tested in a population of 25 young normal-hearing participants using various types of transducers to obtain normative data. Based on these normative data, the "normalized Contrast Level" (in dB nCL) scale was defined, where 0 ± 4 dB nCL corresponds to normal performance and elevated dB nCL values indicate the degree of audible contrast loss. Overall, the results of the present study suggest that the ACT test may be considered a reliable, quick-and-simple (and thus clinically viable) test of STM sensitivity. The ACT can be measured directly after the audiogram using the same set up, adding only a few minutes to the process.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss: audiological profile during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an otological emergency that requires prompt recognition and intervention to prevent devastating impacts on people's lives. During the COVID-19 pandemic, sensory deprivations have been reported in patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus, including deleterious effects on the auditory pathway. This study aims to describe the audiological profile of individuals with SSNHL during the COVID-19 pandemic and to correlate hearing recovery in subgroups of individuals with or without COVID-19. Methods: Prospective cohort including patients diagnosed with SSNHL evaluated in a tertiary care center between March 2020 and September 2022. Hearing loss was confirmed with pure-tone and speech audiometry, with Speech Recognition Threshold (SRT) and word recognition score (WRS). Audiometric testing was performed at the moment of diagnosis, then 7, 30 and 120 days after diagnosis. The average degree of hearing loss was assessed by calculating the 4-frequency pure tone average (4fPTA). The investigation of COVID-19 included RT-PCR technique for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and collection of information regarding disease severity. A statistical analysis was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model to compare the 4fPTA between the four groups (with and without a history of COVID-19, unilateral and bilateral cases) at the end of the follow-up period. Results: Fifty-two patients with SSNHL were assessed, 40 (76.9%) with unilateral and 12 (23.1%) with bilateral hearing loss, totaling 64 ears included. Of those, 15 (28.8%) patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were symptomatic for COVID-19. Of all unilateral cases, 22.5% were seropositive and showed symptoms of COVID-19, a number that increased to 50% for bilateral cases. Comparing the COVID-19 positive groups, individuals with unilateral SSNHL went from 40 dB as their average 4fPTA at onset to 20 dB as their average 4fPTA after 120 days, whereas those with bilateral SSNHL went from an initial average of 60 dB to a final average of 66 dB. Although the 4fPTA value of individuals with unilateral SSNHL improved in 7 days, the mean values showed no significant difference between positive and negative groups. There was a higher incidence of bilateral simultaneous SSNHL in patients who had not been vaccinated against COVID-19 and who presented with symptoms of severe COVID-19. Conclusion: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 resulted in more severe SSNHL, in bilateral SSNHL, and in poorer recovery from SSNHL in bilateral cases. Bilateral SSNHL was seen more frequently in patients who had not received vaccination against COVID-19.

Natural history of otitis media with effusion-related hearing loss in children under 12 years: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess natural history of otitis media with effusion (OME)-related hearing loss and OME causing hearing loss in children under 12 years. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, INAHTA database, CENTRAL, CDSR, Epistemonikos and PsycINFO were searched to identify observational single group studies, and comparative studies with untreated control arms published in English up to June 2022, reporting natural history of OME-related hearing loss and OME causing hearing loss. Risk of bias and overall quality of evidence were assessed using the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, respectively. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 24-639 children were included. Resolution of OME-related hearing loss was 50% by 3 months, 60% by 6 months and 61-77% by 12 months. Resolution of OME causing hearing loss (OME of <1 month, >3 months, >6 months or unknown duration before follow-up) was 23-55% by 3 months, 20-50% by 6 months, 31% by 9 months and 21-93% by 12 months, depending on population and how resolution was defined. Resolution of chronic OME (OME of >12 months duration before follow-up) was only 7% by 1 month, 12% by 6 months and 6% by 12 months. Resolution was only 42% by 57 months in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia. CONCLUSIONS: There was greater resolution of OME-related hearing loss over longer follow-up periods. Resolution of OME causing hearing loss also showed a trend towards greater resolution over longer follow-up periods; however, this did not follow a linear pattern, potentially due to differences in populations and definitions of resolution across studies.

Remote assessment of music perception in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to explore the feasibility of remotely assessing music perception in paediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Pitch direction discrimination (PDD) and timbre recognition (TR) tests were administered remotely. We aimed to provide insights into the potential benefits and challenges of remote assessments. DESIGN: The study was exploratory in nature. All participants underwent remote assessments for the PDD and TR tests. Eight participants completed both online and face-to-face tests. Supervising parents in remote tests completed the System Usability Scale (SUS). STUDY SAMPLE: A cohort of 27 children with CI, averaging 11.19 years of age, participated in this study. RESULTS: In the online condition, the average PDD score was 3.29 semitones (st), the TR score was 37.86%, and the average duration for PDD and TR testing was 9.98 and 6.18 minutes, respectively. Face-to-face sessions had an average PDD score of 3.00 st, a TR score of 32.81% and durations of 10.20 and 5.42 minutes for PDD and TR tests, respectively. The SUS score averaged 64.04. CONCLUSION: These findings contribute to the growing body of knowledge supporting the integration of remote assessments in audiological practices.

Annual hearing screening in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: Results from the first five years in glasgow.

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss is common in people with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), although exactly how common is unknown. The prevalence of hearing loss in children with OI has been reported to be anything from 0 to 77 %. Brittle Bone Society guidelines suggest that, unless there are ear symptoms, children with OI should have their hearing tested every three years starting at age three. There is limited evidence to support this recommendation. We postulate that annual hearing screening would be easier to manage and would have a worthwhile pick-up rate. METHODS: In March 2019 we began a programme of annual hearing screening for all children (ages 0-16) with OI. We collected data on age, genotype, otoscopy findings, tympanometry findings, audiometric test results and subsequent outcomes for the first five years of our programme (2019-2024). RESULTS: Nineteen children with OI participated in the screening programme. Only one abnormality was found: a unilateral mild hearing impairment with a type B tympanogram, suggesting middle ear effusion. This was present in year 2 of the programme but resolved by year 3. CONCLUSION: The screening programme has a low pickup rate (5 %) for new otological problems in the paediatric population. However, we believe that the low cost and small workload associated with the screening programme justifies continuing it until further conclusions can be drawn.

The Effect of Rheumatoid Arthritis on Middle and Inner Ear Functions.

Objective: To investigate the middle and inner ear functions, and efferent auditory systems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Thirty-five RA patients and 40 control subjects participated in the study. Pure-tone audiometry, high-frequency audiometry, multifrequency tympanometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and contralateral suppression tests were administered to all participants. Results: Pure-tone hearing thresholds of RA patients were significantly higher at all frequencies except for 2000 Hz, 14,000 Hz, and 16,000 Hz in the right ear and 16,000 Hz in the left ear (p<0.05). Resonance frequency values of RA patients were statistically significantly lower than those of the control group (p<0.001). Emission amplitudes obtained with contralateral acoustic stimulation were significantly lower at 1400 Hz frequency in both groups than without contralateral acoustic stimulation (p<0.05). While contralateral suppression was observed at all frequencies in the control group, no suppression occurred at 2800 Hz and 4000 Hz in RA patients. Conclusion: The results obtained in this study demonstrated the presence of hearing dysfunction in patients with RA. When a patient is diagnosed with RA, an audiological evaluation should be made, and the patient should be informed about the possibility of audiological involvement.

Evaluating diagnostic and management agreement between physiotherapists and ear, nose and throat specialist in a primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic: A prospective blinded inter-rater agreement pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Dizziness and vertigo are common referrals to Ear Nose Throat (ENT) outpatient services however these services have long waitlists for assessment. Primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinics are recognized as improving access to care. This pilot study investigated agreement between physiotherapists and an ENT medical practitioner for diagnostic and management decisions in patients attending a primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic. METHODS: Prospective blinded inter-rater agreement study undertaken in an ENT primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic. Participants were adults referred to ENT from general practitioners, triaged (Category 2 or 3) to the primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic with clinical symptoms consistent with vestibular disorder. Primary outcome measures included agreement of diagnoses and management decisions made by an ENT medical practitioner and Physiotherapist based on a vestibular physiotherapy assessment. Adverse events were reviewed 11 months post data collection. Gwet's first order agreement co-efficient (AC1) calculated inter-rater reliability between physiotherapy and ENT. RESULTS: Fifty-one participants were recruited consecutively from the primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic. Physiotherapy and ENT had a substantial agreement (AC1 0.613) on diagnosis. AC1 between physiotherapy and ENT for recommending Magnetic resonance imaging (0.810) and computerized tomography (0.935) both indicated near perfect agreement. There was moderate to near-perfect agreement regarding management recommendations between physiotherapy and ENT. Substantial agreement (AC1 0.720) was found for recommendations for ENT input, near perfect agreement (AC1 0.933) for neurology input and moderate agreement (AC1 0.574) for physiotherapy input. There were no adverse events from physiotherapist's management decision, based on final recommendations undertaken 11-months post data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Physiotherapists and ENT medical practitioner made comparable diagnostic and management decisions, based on physiotherapy and audiology hearing assessment, for adults with signs of vestibular dysfunction, within an ENT primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic. This study provides support for this type of Physiotherapy-led service in managing patients referred to an ENT service with vestibular dysfunction.

Modifiable risk factors for developing otitis media with effusion in children under 12 years in high-income countries: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess the modifiable risk factors for developing otitis media with effusion (OME) in children under 12 years. METHODS: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, INAHTA database, CENTRAL, CDSR and Epistemonikos for cohort studies with ≥40 children per arm/prognostic factor, published in English from 2000 to November 2022. We assessed risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies checklist, and overall evidence quality was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Outcomes were analysed as risk ratio (RR), OR or Peto OR. RESULTS: Seven studies totalling 2 760 292 children were included. The evidence was very low quality. Fluid or pus discharge from ears (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.35) and exposure to other children (RR 2.79, 95% CI 1.98 to 3.93) (OR 5.21, 95% CI 2.9 to 9.36) were strongly associated with development of OME. Coughs/colds ≥5 times (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.99), breathing problems ≥5 times (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.53) and ear infections (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.72) in past year were associated with development of OME. Adenoid hypertrophy was strongly associated with development of fluctuating OME (recurrent OME) (OR 9.96, 95% CI 5.17 to 19.19). There was scare evidence for some potential modifiable risk factors, including breast feeding, household smoking, gastro-oesophageal reflux, dummy use and swimming. CONCLUSIONS: Upper respiratory tract infection, ear infection, adenoid hypertrophy and exposure to other children could be the predictors for development of OME. Further observational studies are needed to investigate other potential modifiable risk factors.

Extended scope audiology clinic - a review of its outcomes and re-presentation to the ear nose and throat service.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of Extended Scope (ES) audiologists in managing adult Ear Nose and Throat (ENT)/Otology waitlists and analyse patient re-presentation rate to the ENT service within 12 months of being discharged from the clinic. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study assessing the efficacy of ES audiologists, measuring the discharge rate from ENT waitlists, the rate of escalation to ENT care, and the rate and reasons for any re-presentations to care. STUDY SAMPLE: 394 adult patients. RESULTS: Of the referred patients, 95% (n = 374) were deemed suitable for ES care. Of these, 75% were discharged without further ENT intervention, 20% required escalation to ENT, and 5% were returned to the waitlist. Only one patient re-presented for care within 12 months. The inclusion of patients with CHL/MHL and vestibular symptoms marked an expansion from our previous work. The re-presentation rate was notably lower compared to other allied health ES clinics. CONCLUSION: The ES Audiology clinic demonstrates a high discharge rate with a low incidence of patient re-presentation, highlighting the ES audiologists' efficiency in managing non-urgent ENT cases. The study supports the continued use and expansion of ES roles to ensuring timely and quality care for patients on ENT waitlists.

Developing effective communication skills in audiology using anonymous patient feedback.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of anonymous patient feedback for audiology students, examining alignment between student and patient judgments on communication skills and assessing how students utilise the feedback. DESIGN: This study utilised a mixed methods design, employing a Likert survey to collect patient and student ratings on professionalism, compassion, and listening and talking skills in clinical encounters. Semi-structured interviews investigated the student perspective of receiving patient feedback. STUDY SAMPLE: 13 Audiology students and 31 patients who were placed at, or received care at an Audiology teaching clinic. RESULTS: Patients' ratings across all measures were higher on average when compared to students' self-ratings, only correlating significantly for the measure concerning students' talking skills. Five themes and one subtheme were identified: Emotional impacts, A worthwhile experience, Contrasting priorities, Patients retake centre stage, and Self-reflective learners (subtheme Self-doubt). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that patient feedback led student Audiologists to report heightened seriousness in their interactions and increased attention on skills vital for patient-centred care. The process boosted students' confidence and reinforced awareness of the patient's perspective. Further research is needed to gauge the extent of these effects and explore the feasibility of implementing a large-scale patient feedback program in audiology training settings.

Patients with Mondini deformty: is standard electrode necessary?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare the results of auditory perception tests and speech sound evaluations with electrode array length in patients with Mondini deformity. METHODS: The study included 14 patients who underwent cochlear implantation and radiologically confirmed Mondini deformity between 2007 and 2021 in our clinic. While 7 patients received standard electrode arrays from the MED-EL brand, the remaining 7 received shortened electrode arrays from the MED-EL brand. Differences in auditory perception, articulation, and speech intelligibility between the two groups were examined. Auditory perception tests were administered to these patients preoperatively and at least 2 years after cochlear implant surgery. The patients' auditory perception performance was evaluated using single, double, and triple closed-set word tests (MTP-3, MTP-6, MTP-12), two-syllable open-set word test, Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP) tests for articulation, Phonemic Synthesis Test (SST) for phonemic knowledge, and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for speech intelligibility. RESULTS: Both groups did not show statistically significant differences in auditory perception tests (MTP-3, MTP-6, MTP-12, two-syllable open-set word test), speech sound tests (SST), and speech intelligibility test (SIR). Significant improvement was observed in all tests in both groups when compared preoperatively and postoperatively. CONCLUSION: No significant difference was observed in auditory perception and speech sound tests between groups with short and standard electrode arrays in patients with Mondini deformity. The option of using short electrode arrays during implantation in patients with Mondini deformity can be preferred without doubt in terms of outcomes.

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the hearing implant sound quality index questionnaire (HISQUI19).

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to construct validity and reliability of the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index Questionnaire (HISQUI19) in Turkish. METHODS: This study was a methodologic study to validate HISQUI19 in Turkish. The study included 62 cochlear implant users. Guttman's split half-coefficient and Cronbach's alpha tests were used for construct validity and internal consistency. Pearson correlation test was used to assess the relationship of the HISQUI19 total score to the SSQ49 scales for CI users and to show test - retest reliability. RESULTS: The Cronbach's α value was 0.94 overall score with high internal consistency (Guttman's split-half-coefficient: 0.912). Test-retest reliability results showed high repeatability and consistency of the measure across time (r = 0.708; P = 0.002). Support for conducting factor analysis was provided by the KMO test, with a value of 0.876, which is 'great'. DISCUSSION: Subjective evaluation of cochlear implant users' daily life experiences is a useful tool to reveal the auditory benefits of cochlear implant usage. CONCLUSION: Turkish version of the HISQUI19 is a reliable and valid assessment tool for adults with CIs. This questionnaire provides clinicians with a valuable, reliable, and valid tool for determining the subjective benefit of CI for patients.

Association of herpes simplex virus infection with hearing loss: a cross-sectional study using NHANES data from 2011 to 2012 and 2015 to 2016.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between herpes simplex virus (HSV) and hearing loss using comprehensive population-based research. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study utilised data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to examine the relationship between HSV (types 1 and 2) and hearing loss. The final sample comprised 4608 participants aged 20-49 years. Weighted multivariate regression, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were employed for statistical evaluations. SETTING: Utilising the NHANES data, this cross-sectional study provides insights into the American population aged 20-49 years. PARTICIPANTS: The study includes 4608 participants from the NHANES 2011-2012 and 2015-2016 cycles, focusing on those with complete data on HSV infection and hearing assessment. INTERVENTIONS EXPOSURE: The study analyses the association between HSV (types 1 and 2) infection and hearing loss, using weighted multivariate regression for statistical evaluations. RESULTS: We observed an association between HSV-1 infection and an increased likelihood of hearing impairment (OR, 1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9)). A similar association was noted for those coinfected with HSV-1 and HSV-2 (OR, 1.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.3)). Similarly, higher grades of hearing loss and elevated pure-tone averages were more prevalent in these groups. Notably, the association between HSV-1 and hearing impairment was more pronounced in individuals aged 20-34 (OR, 2.1 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.3); P for interaction=0.020) and those with a body mass index (BMI) below 30 (OR, 1.8 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.8); P for interaction=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an association between HSV-1 infection or coinfections with HSV-1 and HSV-2 and the presence of hearing impairment. The association appears particularly pronounced among younger individuals and those with a lower BMI. Further prospective research is needed to explore the causal impact of HSV on auditory function.

Kids are not just small adults: An attempt to validate pediatric tablet-based digits in noise testing.

Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate whether conductive hearing loss (CHL) can be differentiated from sensorineural hearing loss in children ages 3-18 using a diotic and antiphasic digits-in-noise (DIN) tablet-based test using existing adult cut-off criteria. Methods: A blinded multi-institutional prospective cohort of 64 children aged 3-18 scheduled for an audiometric soundbooth evaluation with a pediatric audiologist and a same-day otolaryngologist examination were recruited for the study. Following a conventional audiogram, the subjects underwent diotic (same-phased stimuli) and antiphasic (out-of-phase stimuli) DIN testing on a HearX Samsung Galaxy tablet with over-the-ear headphones, for a total of 128 measurements. DIN test results were compared with soundbooth audiometry using known adult "cut off criteria." Results: A logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics (age, sex) and race was performed to compare CHL determination from DIN testing to CHL determination with soundbooth audiometry. The results showed 50% agreement with a p-value of .753. The determinations based on combined DIN testing agreed with each other 33% of the time and had a p-value of .373. Otologic pathology and age were not predictive of outcome. Conclusion: This preliminary analysis of DIN testing indicated that DIN and audiometric testing completed in a soundbooth were not significantly predictive of one another in the population of children aged 3-18 when using the adult cut-off criteria for CHL differentiation. Given these findings, further testing is required in children to determine pediatric specific cut-off values.

Association of ambient air pollution and Air Quality Index with risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the associations of air pollutants and Air Quality Index (AQI) with risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) DESIGN: Cross-sectional study SETTING: Medical record data and local population data collected between 2014 and 2022 in Changshu, China were retrospectively reviewed. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 18 years and above who were diagnosed with SSNHL in Changshu No. 1 People's Hospital or Changshu No. 2 People's Hospital from the spring of 2014 to the fall of 2022 were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURE: SSNHL was diagnosed by clinicians using the Chinese diagnostic criteria for SSNHL. RESULTS: Compared with those exposed to the lowest tertile of carbon monoxide (CO), the prevalence ratio for those exposed to middle and high tertiles of CO were 1.113 (95% CI 1.022 to 1.213) and 1.230 (95% CI 1.105 to 1.369), respectively. The risk of SSNHL was increased by 30.6% (95% CI 9.9% to 55.4%) per doubling increment of CO. No categorical association was found between ozone (O3) exposure and risk of SSNHL, however, an increased risk of 22.2% (0.8%-48.2%) was identified for each doubling of O3. No association was identified between other pollutants and AQI and risk of SSNHL. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, CO and O3 were associated with an increased risk of SSNHL in Changshu, China. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.