Current Practices and Emerging Therapies to Optimize Heart Failure Management in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a distinctive manifestation of sarcoidosis, a multisystemic inflammatory disorder that is characterized by non-necrotizing granulomas. CS can lead to arrhythmias, heart failure (HF), and sudden cardiac death. The diagnosis of CS involves imaging in the form of a two-dimensional echocardiogram, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan, and an endomyocardial biopsy. Treatment of CS entails corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, monoclonal antibodies, and, in advanced cases, heart transplantation (HTx). This systematic review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, focusing on HF in sarcoidosis patients. Eligibility criteria include recent (2019-2024) research papers on sarcoidosis-induced heart failure, excluding other causes. The databases searched were PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. From 36,755 initial articles, 2,060 remained after filtering, and 17 were selected for quality assessment. Based on quality assessment, 11 studies were included in the final review. In CS, a variety of treatment strategies can be implemented. Corticosteroids are the first-line therapeutic options, and in the majority of cases, they are very successful in controlling the disease progression. Immunosuppressive agents like methotrexate and azathioprine are used to avoid long-term steroid use. Both corticosteroids and immunosuppressives act by reducing inflammation and preventing myocardial scarring. Biological agents like infliximab and adalimumab prevent disease progression by targeting specific inflammatory pathways and are used in refractory cases. Regular HF management drugs like angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, beta-blockers, and diuretics help in optimizing cardiac function. In severe cases, a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) may be required. The ultimate treatment for end-stage CS is HTx, which has to be supplemented with a strong, individualized regimen of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressives to avoid graft rejection and to control sarcoidosis. Due to a lack of standard protocols for management and limited knowledge about CS, the ideal treatment of HF is still a matter of debate. Hence, further research and clinical trials need to be performed to optimize patient outcomes.

Comparative study of the efficacy of azathioprine, dapsone, and NB-UVB phototherapy as steroid-sparing modalities in generalised lichen planus.

Background Generalised lichen planus (GLP) is a chronic disease with an overall prevalence of 1% requiring longer treatment. Limited studies are available on GLP and its treatment in the literature, unlike oral lichen planus. Objective To determine the best steroid-sparing treatment modality for GLP by comparing the efficacy, response, safety, side effects, and remission with azathioprine, dapsone, and narrowband UV-B (NB-UVB) along with their impact on itching severity and life quality. Methodology Open-label, prospective, comparative, interventional study on generalised lichen planus patients treated with systemic steroids along with one of three steroid-sparing modalities. Totally 90 patients were studied including 30 patients each who received azathioprine (Group A), dapsone (Group B), and narrow band UVB (NB-UVB) (Group C), respectively, for 16 weeks. Itch severity index (ISI) and Dermatology life quality Index (DLQI) were assessed at baseline and week 24. All patients received oral prednisolone until there was no more active disease. Response was assessed in terms of occurrence of new lesions, flattening of lesions, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), and grading of lesions two weeks once for 6 months followed by six months of follow-up after treatment completion. Results Females outnumbered males in all 3 groups. Mean patient ages (34, 38, and 34) and the presence of one or more co-morbidities (50%, 42.3%, 37.5%) in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, were comparable. ISI and DLQI improvement at 24 weeks were greatest with NB-UVB, followed by azathioprine and dapsone in that order; the differences in improvement between groups showed high statistical significance. At week 24, occurrence of new lesions (0%, 0%, 3.8%), flattening (100% - all groups), PIH (100% - all groups), grade 3 lesions i.e. poor response, resolution of 20-50% of lesions (7.1%, 11.5%, 0%), grade 2 lesions i.e. partial response, resolution of 50-90% of lesions (35.7%, 76.9%, 8.3%) and grade 1 lesions i.e. complete response, resolution of >90% lesions (57.1%, 11.5%, 91.3%) were noted in Groups A, B and C, respectively; the differences in the extent of resolution of lesions between the groups were highly significant statistically. Remission was seen in 100%, 76.9%, and 87.5% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, after six months. Limitations The sample size was small. Only 3 treatment options were compared in this study but many more options have been used for lichen planus. Long term follow-up is required. Conclusions NB-UVB with oral steroids showed a better response in terms of improvement in DLQI, ISI, disease control, and side effects than azathioprine and dapsone. Azathioprine showed a faster response and more prolonged remission. Dapsone showed poor response with multiple side effects.

Neovascular Glaucoma: A Rare Presenting Feature of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Syndrome.

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome (VKH) is an uncommon multi-system autoimmune inflammatory disorder characterized by bilateral granulomatous panuveitis with serous retinal detachment accompanied by neurological, auditory, and cutaneous manifestations like headache, hearing loss, vitiligo, and poliosis. It has a female preponderance, usually in middle age. We report the case of a 20-year-old male who presented to us with rapidly progressive visual loss accompanying granular panuveitis, complicated cataract, and a mixed mechanism neovascular glaucoma with acute angle closure. He was treated for IOP control and underwent aggressive immunosuppression and, later, bilateral laser iridotomies. It wasn't until one month after the initial presentation that he presented with vitiligo and poliosis of the eyebrows and eyelashes, clinching the diagnosis of VKH syndrome. This case highlights the diagnostic challenge faced due to acute neovascular glaucoma being the initial presenting feature of VKH; hitherto not documented before, although acute angle closure glaucoma or crisis has occasionally been reported at presentation; the classical VKH presentation being an acute posterior segment uveitis or less commonly, a chronic, recurrent panuveitis presenting with/ without complications. This case underlines the importance of considering VKH syndrome in a patient with bilateral granulomatous panuveitis, as dermatological involvement can emerge later in the disease course, by which time vision might have already been compromised significantly.

A case report of reversible left ventricular dysfunction due to azathioprine hypersensitivity syndrome.

Background: Hypersensitivity reaction is a rare side effect during immunosuppressive treatment with azathioprine (AZA). Some cases of cardiac involvement have already been reported but causality is notoriously difficult to prove. Case summary: We present the case of a 68-year-old man with two episodes of reversible left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. One month after treatment initiation with AZA, he developed non-specific symptoms, including mild chest pain. In the context of elevated cardiac biomarkers and markers of inflammation, echocardiography showed depressed systolic LV function. Biventricular dysfunction was shown on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), but neither myocardial oedema nor late gadolinium enhancement was documented. There was full recovery of LV function after AZA discontinuation. Very similar clinical course and echocardiography findings were observed early after restarting AZA treatment. After definitive cessation of AZA, systolic LV function recovered again and remained stable throughout long-term follow-up. Discussion: Hypersensitivity reaction with cardiac involvement due to AZA is rare. The exact mechanisms underlying AZA-related cardiac dysfunction are still not completely understood, and causality is often difficult to prove. However, because of re-exposure to the drug, which, considered retrospectively, was inappropriate, the effect was clearly apparent in our patient. Knowledge of this potentially life-threatening side effect of AZA treatment is important. AZA must be discontinued promptly if there is any evidence of hypersensitivity reaction.

Efficacy and safety of azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil in chronic actinic dermatitis in skin of color: results of a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD) is an immunologically mediated photodermatosis that has been effectively treated with azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in uncontrolled studies. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of azathioprine and MMF in CAD treatment, aiming to address existing evidence gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive CAD patients were randomized into two groups: azathioprine (Group A) or MMF (Group B) for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline and Week 12. Secondary outcomes included various clinicodemographic factors predictive of treatment response, defined at least a 75% reduction in EASI score (EASI75) by Week 12. RESULTS: The median (IQR) percentage reduction in EASI at 12 weeks was higher in Group B than in Group A [78.3% (75.0-83.30%) vs. 68.3% (31.2-80.10%), P = 0.034]. Baseline DLQI scores indicated a moderate impact on quality of life, with significant reductions by Week 12 in both groups and no intergroup differences at baseline (P = 0.291) or Week 12 (P = 0.599). Overall, 23 patients were classified as non-responders, with more extended illness duration (P = 0.026) and outdoor occupations (P = 0.042) associated with poorer responses. Adverse effects were consistent with known profiles, with one patient discontinuing azathioprine due to hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the efficacy and safety of azathioprine and MMF in CAD treatment, with MMF showing superior outcomes. However, further research is warranted to explore emerging therapies and prognostic factors in CAD management.

Ten-year follow-up cohort of the everolimus versus azathioprine multinational prospective study focusing on intravascular ultrasound findings.

BACKGROUND: Long-term clinical outcomes of early intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings in a prospective cohort of heart transplantation (HTx) patients have not been evaluated. METHODS: This study included patients from 20 centers across Europe and North and South America among the original cohort of the RAD B253 study. Among these patients, 91 had paired IVUS images at baseline and 1-year post-transplant: everolimus 1.5 mg group (n = 25), everolimus 1.5 mg group (n = 33), and azathioprine 3.0 group (n = 33). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, retransplantation, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) within a 10-year follow-up period. The secondary outcome was all-cause death, cardiovascular death, retransplantation, MI, coronary revascularization, and CAV. Donor disease was defined as baseline maximal intimal thickness (MIT) >0.66 mm, and rapid progression was defined as a change in MIT > 0.59 mm at 1 year. RESULTS: Donor disease (46 patients) was associated with a higher incidence of the primary outcome (hazard ratio (HR) 4.444, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.946-10.146, p < 0.001). Rapid progression (44 patients) was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the primary outcome (HR 2.942, 95% CI 1.383-6.260, p = 0.005). Higher-risk features on IVUS (positive both donor disease and rapid progression) were independently associated with poor clinical outcomes (HR 4.800, 95% CI 1.816-12.684, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in baseline MIT and a change in first-year MIT in IVUS post HTx was associated with poor outcomes up to 10 years. Early IVUS findings can be considered as surrogate endpoints for evaluating long-term outcomes in HTx clinical trials.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and azathioprine in patients with alopecia areata and variants: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune pathology manifested by loss of hair. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and azathioprine in patients with AA and variants. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized controlled trail (RCT) carried out at the Department of Dermatology, Medical Teaching Institute-Lady Reading Hospital (MTI-LRH), Peshawar, Pakistan, patients aged ≥ 12 years diagnosed with AA, alopecia totalis (AT) or alopecia universalis (AU) with minimum 50% scalp hair loss for a period ≥ 06 years were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (Group I) or oral azathioprine 2 mg/kg body weight once daily (Group II). The primary endpoint was Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, evaluated at baseline and 06 months follow-up. Safety was consistently assessed during the study. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients underwent random allocation into either the tofacitinib group (n = 52) or the azathioprine group (n = 52). The mean (SD) age of patients was 20.23 (7.14) years and 22.26 (8.07) years, while the mean (SD) disease duration was 6.59 (4.01) years and 7.98 (4.40) years in in Group I and II, respectively. Overall, 40 (38.5%) patients were adolescents while 70 (67.3%) were male. 52 (50%) had AA, 37 (35.5%) had AT and 15 (14.5%) had AU. Mean baseline SALT score in tofacitinib group was 91.02 ± 10.21 and azathioprine group was 91.02 ± 10.63, which at 06 months follow-up improved to 14.1 ± 24.6 and 63.9 ± 33.9, respectively (difference, 11.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 38.3-61.3, p < 0.0001). Overall, no major adverse effects and no difference among the minor adverse effects in the two groups (04 adverse events for tofacitinib group and 08 for azathioprine group: p = 0.23) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of tofacitinib was significantly higher than azathioprine, whilst both drugs were well-tolerated in patients with AA and variants.

Lymphocyte-Directed Immunomodulation Remits Thymoma-Associated Autoimmune Pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND: Thymoma presents with several autoimmune manifestations and is associated with secondary autoimmune regulator (AIRE) deficiency. Pneumonitis has recently been described as an autoimmune manifestation associated with thymoma presenting with similar clinical, radiographic, histological, and autoantibody features as seen in patients with inherited AIRE deficiency who suffer from Autoimmune PolyEndocrinopathy-Candidiasis-Ectodermal Dystrophy (APECED) syndrome. OBJECTIVES: To treat two patients with biopsy-proven thymoma-associated pneumonitis with lymphocyte-directed immunomodulation. METHODS: Two patients with thymoma were enrolled on IRB-approved protocols at the NIH Clinical Center. We performed history and physical examination; laboratory, radiographic, histologic and pulmonary function evaluations; and measurement of the lung-directed autoantibodies KCNRG and BPIFB1 prior to and at 1- and 6-months following initiation of lymphocyte-directed immunomodulation with azathioprine with or without rituximab. RESULTS: Combination T- and B-lymphocyte-directed immunomodulation resulted in improvement of clinical, functional, and radiographic parameters at 6-month follow-up evaluations in both patients with sustained remission up to 12-36 months following treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: Lymphocyte-directed immunomodulation remitted autoimmune pneumonitis in two patients with thymoma.

Unraveling the Clinical Features and Outcomes of IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease.

Background/Objectives: IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD), characterized by lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, fibrosis, and elevated IgG4 levels, presents diagnostic challenges while offering insights into immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. The aim of this study was to comprehensively examine the clinical features and outcomes of IgG4-ROD. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 33 patients diagnosed with IgG4-ROD, fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria. The demographic characteristics of the IgG4-ROD patients were compared with those of 37 patients diagnosed with IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) in departments other than ophthalmology (IgG4-nonROD) at the same hospital during the same period. The patients diagnosed with IgG4-ROD were initially treated with glucocorticosteroid (GCS) monotherapy, GCS combined with steroid-sparing agents (SSAs; mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, hydroxychloroquine), biologic agent (rituximab) monotherapy, or watchful waiting. The primary outcome was the assessed treatment response at 6 months, and the secondary outcome was the evaluation of recurrence at 1 year after initial treatment. A response was evaluated as the absence of ocular signs and symptoms, either clinically or radiologically. Results: Eyelid swelling (17 patients, 51.5%) was the most common symptom, and lacrimal gland (17 patients, 51.5%) was the most frequent site of involvement. The response rate for GCS monotherapy was 33.3% (3 out of 9 patients), while the response rate for GCS combined with SSA was 60.0% (9 out of 15 patients). The lacrimal gland group demonstrated a significantly higher treatment response compared to the non-lacrimal gland group (66.7% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.013), and the combination of GCS and SSA resulted in a significantly higher treatment response than the GCS monotherapy (77.8% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.045). The group including hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which comprised 5 out of 33 patients (15.2%), showed no recurrence at 1 year. Conclusions: The combination therapy of GCS and SSA for IgG4-ROD can be considered an effective treatment approach and HCQ could be considered as a potential adjunctive therapy for IgG4-ROD.

Severe distributive shock, neutrophilic dermatosis, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the setting of azathioprine hypersensitivity syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Azathioprine is a purine synthesis inhibitor used as an immunosuppressive therapy for many immune-mediated diseases. Azathioprine hypersensitivity reaction is a rare, life-threatening adverse reaction characterized by a range of multisystem manifestations including fever, abdominal pain, arthralgias, erythematous cutaneous eruption, acute renal failure, neutrophilia, and more rarely, distributive shock. Although acute heart failure has been rarely described in association with azathioprine hypersensitivity syndrome, myocardial infarction has, to our knowledge, never been associated with this entity. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a case of a 59-year-old male with Crohn's disease who developed severe azathioprine hypersensitivity syndrome that included distributive shock, neutrophilic dermatosis, and acute coronary syndrome with ST-elevation. Clinical improvement was seen after cessation of azathioprine and administration of glucocorticoid therapy. CONCLUSION: Prompt recognition of azathioprine hypersensitivity syndrome, which can manifest as shock and neutrophilic dermatosis, is key to ensure rapid azathioprine cessation.

Carvedilol alleviates the detrimental effects of azathioprine on hepatic tissues in experimental rats: Focusing on redox system, inflammatory and apoptosis pathways.

PURPOSE: Drug-induced liver injury is becoming an increasingly important topic in drug research and clinical practice. Due to a lack of experimental animal models, predicting drug-induced liver injury in humans is challenging. Azathioprine (AZA) is a classical immunosuppressant with hepatotoxic adverse effects. The present study aimed to address the hepatoprotective effect of carvedilol (CAR) against AZA-induced hepatocellular injury via assessing redox-sensitive signals. METHOD: To achieve this purpose, rats were allocated into four groups: control, CAR only, AZA only, and CAR plus AZA groups. The induction of hepatic injury was induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of AZA at a dose of 50 mg/kg on the 6th day of the experiment. Each experimental protocol was approved and supervised by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments. RESULTS: The results of the present study revealed that CAR administration significantly diminished AZA-induced hepatic dysfunction, as evidenced by relief of hepatic function biomarkers and histopathological aberration induced by AZA injection. Besides, CAR restored oxidant/antioxidant balance as well as NRF2 expression. In addition, CAR suppressed inflammatory response induced by AZA challenge as evidenced by downregulation of TLR4, TNF-α, MPO, and eNOS/iNOS levels in hepatic tissue. Moreover, CAR recovered apoptotic/anti-apoptotic status by modulation of caspase-3/Bcl2 expression. CONCLUSION: Taken together, CAR protects against AZA-induced hepatic injury via antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic activities. These findings revealed that CAR could be a good candidate for hepatic injury protection and can be added to AZA therapeutic regimen to reduce their adverse effect.

Efficacy of Combination Therapies for Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a hepatocellular disorder thought to be caused by an immune system that cannot tolerate autoantigens specific to hepatocytes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using corticosteroids (prednisolone and azathioprine) as a combination therapy in treating AIH. This study aims to synthesize and analyze existing evidence to inform clinical practices concerning the overall clinical efficacy of this treatment approach in managing AIH. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple online databases and search engines, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Medline, and Embase. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis, with forest plots created for each outcome. Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The results indicate that the combination of prednisolone and azathioprine for treating AIH leads to less recurrence and better disease control.

Unravelling the Complexity of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease.

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of demyelination affecting the central nervous system. The following case report showcases a thorough analysis of a 21-year-old female patient presenting with MOGAD, outlining her clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, treatment protocol, and long-term management outcomes. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we aim to augment the understanding of this complex neurological entity and steer optimal therapeutic interventions.

[Seronegative autoimmune hepatitis]. / Hepatitis autoinmune seronegativa.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare, chronic, inflammatory, and necrotic liver disease characterized by the presence of autoantibodies. Its etiology is unknown. It affects 1 in 200 000 people annually in the US and occurs predominantly in women. Its presentation varies from asymptomatic forms to cirrhosis and acute liver failure and its diagnosis is based on the measurement of autoantibodies, such as antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA) and anti-liver and kidney microsomal antibodies (anti-LKM). 1). 10% of HAIs do not present antibodies, being called seronegative HAI, requiring a liver biopsy for diagnosis. To date the evidence remains limited and different societies have issued suggestions and recommendations. For this reason, we believe it is relevant to carry out a bibliographic review on the subject, capturing in this document the important information for the understanding and management of this pathology.

La hepatitis autoinmune (HAI) es una enfermedad inflamatoria y necrótica del hígado, crónica e infrecuente caracterizada por la presencia de autoanticuerpos. Su etiología es desconocida. Afecta a 1 de cada 200 000 personas anualmente en los EE. UU. y se presenta predominantemente en mujeres. Su presentación varía desde formas asintomáticas hasta la cirrosis y falla hepática aguda y su diagnóstico se basa en la medición de autoanticuerpos, como los autoanticuerpos antinucleares (ANA), anticuerpos antimúsculo liso (ASMA) y anticuerpos antimicrosomales de hígado y riñón (anti-LKM-1). El 10% de las HAI no presentan anticuerpos, denominándose HAI seronegativa, necesitando biopsia hepática para el diagnóstico. Hasta la fecha la evidencia sigue siendo limitada y diferentes sociedades han emitido sugerencias y recomendaciones. Por tal motivo creemos relevante realizar una revisión bibliográfica sobre el tema plasmando en este documento la información importante para la compresión y el manejo de esta patología.

The clinical management of hepatic sarcoidosis: A systematic review.

Background: Hepatic sarcoidosis is an uncommon clinical condition in which clear recommendations are lacking in its treatment. We aimed to review systematically the literature on hepatic sarcoidosis treatment to guide clinicians. Methods: Using MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases, we searched original articles on clinical studies reporting the outcome of adult hepatic sarcoidosis patients following treatment with various pharmacological agents. The primary end point was focused on assessing symptomatic relief and biochemical improvement posttreatment. Results: Out of 614 retrieved references, 34 published studies were eligible, providing data for a total of 268 patients with hepatic sarcoidosis. First-line therapy with corticosteroids alone was reported in 187 patients, whilst ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was used in 40 patients. Symptomatic and biochemical responses were reported among 113(60.4%) and 80(42.8%) cases of corticosteroids respectively, whereas UDCA showed a complete response in 23(57.5%) patients. Second-line therapy was used in steroid-refractory cases, with most cases being reported for azathioprine (n = 32) and methotrexate (n = 28). Notably, 15(46.9%) and 11(39.2%) patients showed both clinical and biochemical responses respectively. Biological therapy including anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) was used as third line therapy in twelve cases with a 72.7% symptomatic and biochemical response rate each. Conclusion: The quality of evidence for the treatment of hepatic sarcoidosis was poor. Nevertheless, it appears that corticosteroid or UDCA may be utilized as first-line therapy. For cases that are refractory to corticosteroids, steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents and anti-TNF have shown some promising results, but further high-quality studies are required.

Evaluation of tolerance to mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and gastrointestinal intolerance to azathioprine / Evaluación de la tolerancia a la mercaptopurina en los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal e intolerancia gastrointestinal a la azatioprina

Background Thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) are commonly utilized to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Their use is frequently restricted due to gastrointestinal intolerance (GI). Previous retrospective studies have reported that AZA-intolerant patients may benefit from a switch to MP; yet the effectiveness of this strategy has not been prospectively evaluated.AimsTo assess GI tolerance to MP in patients who are intolerant to AZA, and to identify clinical predictors of GI intolerance to AZA or MP.MethodsA prospective, observational, single-cohort study was performed in 92 thiopurine-naïve IBD patients. They were started on a 50mg dose of AZA and escalated to 2.5mg/kg per day by week 2. Those with GI intolerance were rechallenged with a 50% dose of AZA, after which another dose escalation attempt was made. If symptoms persisted, they were switched to MP.ResultsThirty (32.6%) of the recruited patients suffered from GI intolerance to AZA. Of these, 15 did not present recurrence of symptoms after rechallenge with lower doses. Of 15 intolerant patients, 14 were switched to MP. Within the MP cohort, 8 patients (57%) were also intolerant to MP, 5 (36%) had no symptoms, and 1 (7%) was lost to follow-up. Female gender was the only independent predictor of GI intolerance to AZA.ConclusionsUp to half of the AZA-intolerant patients tolerated a 50% dose rechallenge that was successfully escalated. A switch to MP was tolerated in over a third of cases whom rechallenge failed. Our strategy (challenge–rechallenge–switch) achieved an overall GI tolerance to thiopurines in most of the patients. (AU)

Antecedentes Las tiopurinas como la azatioprina (AZA) y la mercaptopurina (MP) se utilizan comúnmente para tratar la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII). Su uso está frecuentemente restringido debido a la intolerancia gastrointestinal. Estudios retrospectivos anteriores han informado que los pacientes intolerantes a la AZA pueden beneficiarse de un cambio a MP; sin embargo, la eficacia de esta estrategia no ha sido evaluada prospectivamente.ObjetivosEvaluar la tolerancia gastrointestinal a MP en pacientes que son intolerantes a AZA e identificar predictores clínicos de intolerancia gastrointestinal a AZA o MP.MétodosSe realizó un estudio prospectivo, observacional y de cohorte única en 92 pacientes con EII que nunca habían recibido tiopurinas. Comenzaron con una dosis de 50mg de AZA y se aumentó a 2,5mg/kg por día en la semana 2. En aquellos con intolerancia gastrointestinal se administró una dosis del 50% de AZA que se fue incrementando en función de la tolerancia. Si los síntomas persistían, se cambiaba a MP.ResultadosTreinta (32,6%) de los pacientes reclutados presentaron intolerancia gastrointestinal a la AZA. De estos, 15 no presentaron recurrencia de los síntomas después de la nueva exposición. De los 15 pacientes que no toleraron una dosis más baja, 14 recibieron MP. De los que recibieron MP, 8 pacientes (57%) también eran intolerantes a MP, 5 (36%) no tenían síntomas y uno (7%) se perdió durante el seguimiento. El género femenino fue el único predictor independiente de intolerancia gastrointestinal a la AZA.ConclusionesHasta la mitad de los pacientes intolerantes a la AZA toleran una nueva exposición al 50% de la dosis. Se toleró un cambio a MP en más de un tercio de los casos en los que la reexposición fracasó. Nuestra estrategia logró la tolerancia gastrointestinal a tiopurinas en la mayoría de los pacientes. (AU)

Oral Prescription Management.

The treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) with oral treatments has been limited in the past due to the increased risk of adverse effects associated with oral agents. However, in recent years, a shift toward the minimization of adverse effects has been explored. Although existing treatment options like oral corticosteroids and Immunosuppressive therapies have been utilized for acute flare-ups of AD, their long-term use is limited by adverse effects and the need for lab monitoring. New systemic treatment options such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are emerging as a promising therapy, due to their quick onset and antipruritic features. However, the black box warning associated with this medication class requires careful selection of appropriate candidates and patient education despite early favorable safety profiles seen in AD trials. Discussion of other oral agents, like antibiotics and antihistamines, and their role in AD management are also clarified.

A rare case report: Myopathy related to the interaction between azathioprine and infliximab in the treatment of ulcerative colitis and ankylosing spondylitis.

Key Clinical Message: Administering azathioprine or infliximab for UC and AS treatment carries a significant risk of adverse reactions. Here, we present the case diagnosed with UC and AS, who received treatment with azathioprine and infliximab for 10 months, and subsequently developed drug-induced myopathy affecting the right vastus medialis muscle. Abstract: Drug-induced myopathy is an uncommon form of muscle injury that can arise in patients without preexisting muscle conditions when exposed to therapeutic doses of certain medications. Administering azathioprine or infliximab for ulcerative colitis (UC) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treatment carries a significant risk of adverse reactions, including drug-induced myopathy and increased susceptibility to opportunistic infections. However, occurrences of myopathy induced by the combination of azathioprine and infliximab are rarely reported in clinical practice. Here, we present the case of a 37-year-old male patient diagnosed with UC and AS, who received treatment with azathioprine and infliximab for 10 months. Despite the resolution of symptoms and improvement in intestinal mucosal inflammation observed via endoscopy, the patient subsequently developed drug-induced myopathy affecting the right vastus medialis muscle.

OpenSAFELY: The impact of COVID-19 on azathioprine, leflunomide and methotrexate monitoring, and factors associated with change in monitoring rate.

AIMS: The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented pressure on healthcare services. This study investigates whether disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) safety monitoring was affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A population-based cohort study was conducted using the OpenSAFELY platform to access electronic health record data from 24.2 million patients registered at general practices using TPP's SystmOne software. Patients were included for further analysis if prescribed azathioprine, leflunomide or methotrexate between November 2019 and July 2022. Outcomes were assessed as monthly trends and variation between various sociodemographic and clinical groups for adherence with standard safety monitoring recommendations. RESULTS: An acute increase in the rate of missed monitoring occurred across the study population (+12.4 percentage points) when lockdown measures were implemented in March 2020. This increase was more pronounced for some patient groups (70-79 year-olds: +13.7 percentage points; females: +12.8 percentage points), regions (North West: +17.0 percentage points), medications (leflunomide: +20.7 percentage points) and monitoring tests (blood pressure: +24.5 percentage points). Missed monitoring rates decreased substantially for all groups by July 2022. Consistent differences were observed in overall missed monitoring rates between several groups throughout the study. CONCLUSION: DMARD monitoring rates temporarily deteriorated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Deterioration coincided with the onset of lockdown measures, with monitoring rates recovering rapidly as lockdown measures were eased. Differences observed in monitoring rates between medications, tests, regions and patient groups highlight opportunities to tackle potential inequalities in the provision or uptake of monitoring services. Further research should evaluate the causes of the differences identified between groups.

Maintaining remission in Crohn's disease post surgery: what can we learn from Cochrane?

Surgery is a vital pillar in the management of Crohn's disease and medical options for prevention of recurrence after surgery are a key consideration. The main classes of effective induction therapies have very different efficacy data for maintenance and this is more pronounced in the postsurgical setting. In this review article, the up-to-date Cochrane reviews on the topic are presented, including a network meta-analysis. The Cochrane evidence shows a high relapse rate in the first 5 years after surgery with placebo or no treatment. The reviews demonstrate that 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) agents are probably more effective than placebo on pairwise and network meta-analysis, with moderate certainty evidence of a number needed to treat (NNT) of 13. The Cochrane evidence demonstrates that adalimumab may be more effective than placebo on pairwise and network meta-analysis, with low certainty evidence of an NNT of 2. Thiopurine analogues may be effective on pairwise analysis, but may not be effective on network meta-analysis. There was no evidence to support the use of any other agent but these findings are of low and very low certainty. It is proposed that clinicians should consider adalimumab, 5-ASA and thiopurine analogue agents based on the findings of the Cochrane synthesis. The use of the evidence, including the Grading of Recomendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) certainty and magnitude of effect data, can support discussions with patients. Future research is needed to consider other therapies that are effective in medically induced maintenance given the low certainty of evidence limiting conclusions, either supporting or refuting their use.