Evaluation of tolerance to mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and gastrointestinal intolerance to azathioprine / Evaluación de la tolerancia a la mercaptopurina en los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal e intolerancia gastrointestinal a la azatioprina

Background Thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) are commonly utilized to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Their use is frequently restricted due to gastrointestinal intolerance (GI). Previous retrospective studies have reported that AZA-intolerant patients may benefit from a switch to MP; yet the effectiveness of this strategy has not been prospectively evaluated.AimsTo assess GI tolerance to MP in patients who are intolerant to AZA, and to identify clinical predictors of GI intolerance to AZA or MP.MethodsA prospective, observational, single-cohort study was performed in 92 thiopurine-naïve IBD patients. They were started on a 50mg dose of AZA and escalated to 2.5mg/kg per day by week 2. Those with GI intolerance were rechallenged with a 50% dose of AZA, after which another dose escalation attempt was made. If symptoms persisted, they were switched to MP.ResultsThirty (32.6%) of the recruited patients suffered from GI intolerance to AZA. Of these, 15 did not present recurrence of symptoms after rechallenge with lower doses. Of 15 intolerant patients, 14 were switched to MP. Within the MP cohort, 8 patients (57%) were also intolerant to MP, 5 (36%) had no symptoms, and 1 (7%) was lost to follow-up. Female gender was the only independent predictor of GI intolerance to AZA.ConclusionsUp to half of the AZA-intolerant patients tolerated a 50% dose rechallenge that was successfully escalated. A switch to MP was tolerated in over a third of cases whom rechallenge failed. Our strategy (challenge–rechallenge–switch) achieved an overall GI tolerance to thiopurines in most of the patients. (AU)

Antecedentes Las tiopurinas como la azatioprina (AZA) y la mercaptopurina (MP) se utilizan comúnmente para tratar la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII). Su uso está frecuentemente restringido debido a la intolerancia gastrointestinal. Estudios retrospectivos anteriores han informado que los pacientes intolerantes a la AZA pueden beneficiarse de un cambio a MP; sin embargo, la eficacia de esta estrategia no ha sido evaluada prospectivamente.ObjetivosEvaluar la tolerancia gastrointestinal a MP en pacientes que son intolerantes a AZA e identificar predictores clínicos de intolerancia gastrointestinal a AZA o MP.MétodosSe realizó un estudio prospectivo, observacional y de cohorte única en 92 pacientes con EII que nunca habían recibido tiopurinas. Comenzaron con una dosis de 50mg de AZA y se aumentó a 2,5mg/kg por día en la semana 2. En aquellos con intolerancia gastrointestinal se administró una dosis del 50% de AZA que se fue incrementando en función de la tolerancia. Si los síntomas persistían, se cambiaba a MP.ResultadosTreinta (32,6%) de los pacientes reclutados presentaron intolerancia gastrointestinal a la AZA. De estos, 15 no presentaron recurrencia de los síntomas después de la nueva exposición. De los 15 pacientes que no toleraron una dosis más baja, 14 recibieron MP. De los que recibieron MP, 8 pacientes (57%) también eran intolerantes a MP, 5 (36%) no tenían síntomas y uno (7%) se perdió durante el seguimiento. El género femenino fue el único predictor independiente de intolerancia gastrointestinal a la AZA.ConclusionesHasta la mitad de los pacientes intolerantes a la AZA toleran una nueva exposición al 50% de la dosis. Se toleró un cambio a MP en más de un tercio de los casos en los que la reexposición fracasó. Nuestra estrategia logró la tolerancia gastrointestinal a tiopurinas en la mayoría de los pacientes. (AU)

ITPA polymorphisms do not predict additional risk beyond TPMT and NUDT15 for thiopurine-induced cytopenia in inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Thiopurine-related leukopenia is associated with polymorphisms in the thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X type motif 15 (NUDT15) genes. However, those polymorphisms explain only a fraction of thiopurine-related leukopenia. Our aim was to study the role of an inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) polymorphism in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and thiopurine-related leukopenia that was unexplained by the TPMT and NUDT15 polymorphisms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled consecutive IBD patients on thiopurines (azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine) from January 2019-March 2020, at a tertiary care center in North India. The presence of the ITPA (C.94C > A) polymorphism was evaluated in all patients, along with its association with thiopurine-related leukopenia. RESULTS: Of the 33 patients (from a total of 119 patients) that developed leukopenia, 8 had the TPMT (n = 1) or NUDT15 (n = 7) polymorphism. Of the remaining 111 patients, their mean age was 36.36 ±â€¯13.54 years and 57 (51.3%) were males. Twenty-five (21.01%) had unexplained leukopenia. The ITPA polymorphism was detected in 4 (16%) patients in the unexplained leukopenia group and 24 (27.9%) patients in the non-leukopenia group (p = 0.228). The odds ratio for predicting leukopenia with the ITPA polymorphism was 0.4921 (95% CI 0.1520-1.5830, p = 0.234). CONCLUSION: The ITPA (C.94C > A) polymorphism was frequently detected in the study population but was not predictive for leukopenia in patients with IBD on thiopurine therapy.

Evaluation of tolerance to mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and gastrointestinal intolerance to azathioprine.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) are commonly utilized to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Their use is frequently restricted due to gastrointestinal intolerance (GI). Previous retrospective studies have reported that AZA-intolerant patients may benefit from a switch to MP; yet the effectiveness of this strategy has not been prospectively evaluated. AIMS: To assess GI tolerance to MP in patients who are intolerant to AZA, and to identify clinical predictors of GI intolerance to AZA or MP. METHODS: A prospective, observational, single-cohort study was performed in 92 thiopurine-naïve IBD patients. They were started on a 50mg dose of AZA and escalated to 2.5mg/kg per day by week 2. Those with GI intolerance were rechallenged with a 50% dose of AZA, after which another dose escalation attempt was made. If symptoms persisted, they were switched to MP. RESULTS: Thirty (32.6%) of the recruited patients suffered from GI intolerance to AZA. Of these, 15 did not present recurrence of symptoms after rechallenge with lower doses. Of 15 intolerant patients, 14 were switched to MP. Within the MP cohort, 8 patients (57%) were also intolerant to MP, 5 (36%) had no symptoms, and 1 (7%) was lost to follow-up. Female gender was the only independent predictor of GI intolerance to AZA. CONCLUSIONS: Up to half of the AZA-intolerant patients tolerated a 50% dose rechallenge that was successfully escalated. A switch to MP was tolerated in over a third of cases whom rechallenge failed. Our strategy (challenge-rechallenge-switch) achieved an overall GI tolerance to thiopurines in most of the patients.

Evolución clínica en neuromielitis óptica comparando el manejo con azatioprina o rituximab / Clinical evolution in neuromyelitis optica when comparing management with azathioprine and rituximab

RESUMEN INTRODUCCIÓN: El espectro de trastornos de neuromielitis óptica (NMOSD) es un grupo de enfermedades desmielinizantes, inflamatorias y autoinmunes, caracterizadas por episodios recurrentes de neuritis óptica y mielitis transversa longitudinal extensa, entre otras manifestaciones clínicas. Su tratamiento crónico se basa en el uso de terapias inmunosupresoras como azatioprina (AZA), micofenolato mofetilo (MFM) o rituximab (RTX). El objetivo del presente estudio es realizar un análisis comparativo de la respuesta al tratamiento con AZA o RTX. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio observacional, analítico, retrospectivo, en el cual se incluyeron inicialmente 69 pacientes con diagnóstico confirmado de NMOSD. Tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión 59 pacientes fueron incluidos en el análisis final. RESULTADOS: En el grupo de RTX se evidenció una mejoría importante en el estado funcional en comparación con el grupo de AZA, en el que se vio un empeoramiento de este al año de seguimiento. El perfil de seguridad fue similar entre ambos grupos, con una adherencia significativamente superior en el grupo de RTX. DISCUSIÓN: Los hallazgos del presente estudio respecto a las ventajas del uso de RTX sobre AZA se encuentran en concordancia con resultados de estudios previos reportados en la literatura. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados respaldan el uso de RTX sobre AZA como terapia de mantenimiento para pacientes con NMOSD, al estar asociado principalmente con una mejoría notable en la funcionalidad de los pacientes, al igual que una mayor adherencia al tratamiento.

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD) is a group of inflammatory, autoimmune, and demyelinating disorders. Its hallmark behavior is characterized by recurrent episodes of optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis, among other clinical manifestations. Chronic therapy is based primarily in immunosuppressive therapies such as azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or rituximab (RTX). The goal of this study is to perform a comparative analysis of response rates to chronic treatment with either AZA or RTX. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational analytic study was designed with an initial cohort of 69 patients with a diagnosis of NMOSD. After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria a total of 59 patients were finally included in the analysis. RESULTS: The RTX group had an improved functional status when compared to the AZA group; in the latter this feature worsened after a one-year follow-up. There was also a comparable safety profile between the two groups with a significantly greater adherence to RTX regimes. DISCUSSION: The findings of the current study as to the benefits of RTX in comparison to AZA are similar to the results of previous studies. CONCLUSION: These results favor the use of RTX as maintenance treatment of NMOSD, because of its greater benefit mainly in the improvement in functional status of patients, as well as a greater adherence to treatment.

Optimization of azathioprine dose in combined treatment with anti-TNF-alpha in inflammatory bowel disease / Optimización de la dosis de azatioprina en tratamiento combinado con fármacos anti-TNF en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

Introduction: The dose of thiopurine drugs in combined treatments with anti-TNF in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been clearly established. The purpose of this study is to assess whether the dose of azathioprine influences clinical and biochemical response/remission rates, and anti-TNF drug levels/antibody formation. Material and methods: Patients with IBD on combined maintenance treatment with azathioprine and infliximab or adalimumab were selected. Based on the dose of azathioprine, two groups were defined (standard: 2–2.5mg/kg/day; and decreased: less than 2mg/kg/day). Results: In the IFX group, there were no statistically significant differences (p=0.204) in the rates of remission (39% vs 41.3%), response (10% vs 21.7%) or failure (51.5% vs 37%) depending on the dose of thiopurine drugs. No differences were found between AZA-dose dependent IFX levels (2.46 vs 3.21μg/mL; p=0.211). In the adalimumab group, there were no statistically significant differences (p=0.83) in the rates of remission (66% vs 56%), response without remission (15.38% vs 25%) or failure (18% vs 18%) depending on the dose of thiopurines. With respect to ADA-levels, no differences were found in both groups (7.69 vs 8.23μg/mL; p=0.37). Conclusion: In our experience, no statistically significant differences were found in either anti-TNF levels or clinical-biological response/remission rates based on doses of azathioprine.(AU)

Introducción: La dosis adecuada de los fármacos tiopurínicos en tratamientos combinados con anti-TNF en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) no ha sido establecida con claridad. El propósito de este estudio es evaluar si la dosis de azatioprina influye en las tasas de respuesta/remisión clínica y bioquímica y en los niveles de fármaco anti-TNF/formación de anticuerpos. Material y métodos: Se seleccionaron pacientes con EII en tratamiento combinado de mantenimiento con azatioprina (AZA) e infliximab (IFX) o adalimumab (ADA). En función de la dosis de AZA, se definieron dos grupos (estándar: 2-2,5 mg/kg/día o disminuida: menos de 2 mg/kg/día). Resultados: En el grupo IFX no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p = 0,204) en las tasas de remisión (39 vs. 41,3%), respuesta (10 vs. 21,7%) o fracaso (51,5 vs. 37%), dependiendo de la dosis de fármacos tiopurínicos. No se encontraron diferencias entre los niveles de IFX dependientes de la dosis de AZA (2,46 vs. 3,21 μg/mL; p = 0,211). En el grupo de ADA no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p = 0,83) en las tasas de remisión (66 vs. 56%), respuesta sin remisión (15,38 vs. 25%) o fallo (18 vs. 18%), dependiendo de la dosis de tiopurinas. Con respecto a los niveles de ADA, no se encontraron diferencias en ambos grupos (7,69 vs. 8,23 μg/mL; p = 0,37). Conclusión: En nuestra experiencia, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas ni en los niveles de anti-TNF ni en las tasas de respuesta/remisión clínico-biológica basadas en las dosis de azatioprina.(AU)

Long-term safety of azathioprine for treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders / Segurança a longo prazo da azatioprina no tratamento dos transtornos do espectro da neuromielite óptica

ABSTRACT Background: Azathioprine is a common first-line therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether long-term treatment (>10 years) with azathioprine is safe in NMOSD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective medical record review of all patients at the School of Medicine of the University of São Paulo (São Paulo, Brazil) who fulfilled the 2015 international consensus diagnostic criteria for NMOSD and were treated with azathioprine for at least 10 years. Results: Out of 375 patients assessed for eligibility, 19 were included in this analysis. These patients' median age was 44 years (range=28-61); they were mostly female (17/19) and AQP4-IgG seropositive (18/19). The median disease duration was 15 years (range=10-39) and most patients presented a relapsing clinical course (84.2%). The median duration of treatment was 11.9 years (range=10.0-23.8). The median annualized relapse rates (ARR) pre- and post-treatment with azathioprine were 1 (range=0.1-2) and 0.1 (range=0-0.35); p=0.09. Three patients (15.7%) had records of adverse events during the follow-up, which consisted of chronic B12 vitamin deficiency, pulmonary tuberculosis and breast cancer. Conclusion: Azathioprine may be considered a safe agent for long-term treatment (>10 years) of NMOSD, but continuous vigilance for infections and malignancies is required.

RESUMO Introdução: A azatioprina é um tratamento comum de primeira linha para os transtornos do espectro neuromielite óptica (NMOSD). Objetivo: Este estudo visou determinar a segurança do tratamento a longo prazo (>10 anos) da NMOSD com a azatioprina. Métodos: Foi realizada revisão retrospectiva de todos os prontuários de pacientes que preenchiam critérios de NMOSD de acordo com o "International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for NMOSD" de 2015 em uso de azatioprina por ao menos 10 anos matriculados no ambulatório de Doenças Desmielinizantes do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Resultados: De 375 pacientes avaliados, 19 preencheram critérios de inclusão para análise. A mediana de idade foi de 44 anos (variância=28-61); os pacientes eram predominantemente do sexo feminino (17/19) e AQP4-IgG soropositivos (18/19). A mediana do tempo de duração de doença foi 11,9 anos (variância=10,0-23,8), a mediana da taxa anualizada de surtos pré e pós-tratamento foi de 1 (variância=0,1-2) e 0,1 (variância=0-0,35), p=0,09. Três pacientes (15,7%) apresentaram registro de eventos adversos durante o seguimento: deficiência crônica de vitamina B12, tuberculose pulmonar e câncer de mama. Conclusão: A azatioprina provavelmente pode ser considerada segura para o tratamento a longo prazo (>10 anos) da NMOSD, porém vigilância contínua de neoplasias e infecções é necessária.

Nodular anterior scleritis associated with Berger's disease / Esclerite anterior nodular associada à doença de Berger

ABSTRACT A 45-year-old female patient presented with a complaint of right eye redness and pain for 7 days. She was under investigation for urinary abnormalities and reported a previous history of recurrent oral ulcers and ocular hyperemia in both eyes. Best-corrected visual acuity was 20/30 and 20/20 in the right and left eyes, respectively. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy of the ocular surface of the right eye revealed nasal scleral hyperemia that persisted after instillation of topical phenylephrine 10%, reinforcing the diagnosis of anterior scleritis. Renal biopsy showed immunoglobulin A immune complexes and confirmed the suspected diagnosis of Berger's disease. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine following a 6-month induction of remission with cyclophosphamide was necessary after pulse therapy with methylprednisolone. Scleritis is usually related to systemic autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, and polyangiitis. Herein, we describe a rare case of unilateral anterior scleritis associated with Berger's disease.

RESUMO Paciente de 45 anos, sexo feminino queixava-se de hiperemia e dor no olho direito há sete dias. Encontrava-se sob investigação de alterações urinárias e relatou história pregressa de úlceras orais e hiperemia ocular bilateral recorrentes. A acuidade visual corrigida era de 20/30 no olho direito e 20/20 no esquerdo. A biomicroscopia da superfície ocular do olho direito revelou intensa hiperemia escleral em região nasal que persistiu após a instilação de fenilefrina tópica a 10%, reforçando o diagnóstico clínico de esclerite anterior unilateral. A biópsia renal revelou a presença de imunocomplexos de IgA e confirmou a hipótese de doença de Berger. Uma terapia imunossupressora de manutenção com azatioprina após 6 meses de indução de remissão com ciclofosfamida foi necessária após pulsoterapia com metilprednisolona. A esclerite geralmente está relacionada a doenças autoimunes sistêmicas, como artrite reumatoide e poliangeite. Descrevemos aqui um caso raro de esclerite anterior unilateral associada à doença de Berger.

Optimization of azathioprine dose in combined treatment with anti-TNF-alpha in inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: The dose of thiopurine drugs in combined treatments with anti-TNF in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been clearly established. The purpose of this study is to assess whether the dose of azathioprine influences clinical and biochemical response/remission rates, and anti-TNF drug levels/antibody formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with IBD on combined maintenance treatment with azathioprine and infliximab or adalimumab were selected. Based on the dose of azathioprine, two groups were defined (standard: 2-2.5mg/kg/day; and decreased: less than 2mg/kg/day). RESULTS: In the IFX group, there were no statistically significant differences (p=0.204) in the rates of remission (39% vs 41.3%), response (10% vs 21.7%) or failure (51.5% vs 37%) depending on the dose of thiopurine drugs. No differences were found between AZA-dose dependent IFX levels (2.46 vs 3.21µg/mL; p=0.211). In the adalimumab group, there were no statistically significant differences (p=0.83) in the rates of remission (66% vs 56%), response without remission (15.38% vs 25%) or failure (18% vs 18%) depending on the dose of thiopurines. With respect to ADA-levels, no differences were found in both groups (7.69 vs 8.23µg/mL; p=0.37). CONCLUSION: In our experience, no statistically significant differences were found in either anti-TNF levels or clinical-biological response/remission rates based on doses of azathioprine.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in two adolescents with severe atopic dermatitis / Eficácia e segurança do uso de dupilumabe em dois adolescentes com dermatite atópica grave

ABSTRACT We report the cases of two adolescent siblings with severe atopic dermatitis, who, despite weighing approximately 40kg, presented a good response to dupilumab with the off-label dose for individuals aged 12 years and weighing 60kg. Both had already used cyclosporine, azathioprine, methotrexate and oral corticosteroids for long periods, plus topical treatments with no adequate disease control. Skin lesions were constant and widespread, with frequent skin infections and very poor quality of life, with numerous physical and psychosocial consequences, such as dropping out of school activities due to severe itching, appearance and bullying. They also showed delayed growth and development. In 2018, dupilumab, an immunobiological agent, was approved for treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adults and, in 2019, extended to the 12-17-year age group. Although it had already been approved by the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency, the 200mg presentation (indicated for the weight of patients) was not available, with no expected arrival date. Therefore, weighing the risks and benefits of the situation of both, we chose to treat them with an adult dose (loading dose of 600mg subcutaneously, and 300mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks) despite the low weight. So far, they have received eight injections, showing significant improvement of disease and quality of life. There were no major adverse effects, only worsening of allergic conjunctivitis in one of them. The patients and their family are very satisfied, and we believe that the therapy has been successful.

RESUMO Relatamos os casos de dois irmãos adolescentes com dermatite atópica grave e que, apesar de pesarem cerca de 40kg, apresentaram boa resposta ao dupilumabe com a dose off-label para indivíduos com 12 anos e peso de 60kg. Ambos já tinham usado ciclosporina, azatioprina, metotrexato e corticoide oral por longos períodos, acrescidos de tratamentos tópicos sem controle adequado da doença. As lesões cutâneas eram constantes e disseminadas, e os irmãos apresentavam infeções de pele frequentes e qualidade de vida muito ruim, com inúmeras consequências físicas e psicossociais, como o abandono da atividade escolar pelo prurido intenso, pela aparência e pelo bullying sofrido. Apresentavam também retardo de crescimento e de desenvolvimento. Em 2018, o dupilumabe, um agente imunobiológico, foi aprovado para o tratamento de dermatite atópica moderada a severa para adultos e, em 2019, ampliado para faixa etária de 12 a 17 anos. Embora já tivesse a aprovação da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária no Brasil, a apresentação de 200mg (indicada para o peso dos pacientes) não estava disponível, sem previsão de chegada. Assim, pesando os riscos e benefícios da situação de ambos, optamos por tratá-los com dose de adulto (ataque de 600mg por via subcutânea e 300mg por via subcutânea a cada 2 semanas) apesar do baixo peso. Até o momento, eles realizaram oito aplicações, apresentando importante melhora da doença e da qualidade de vida. Não houve efeitos adversos importantes - apenas a piora da conjuntivite alérgica em um deles. Os pacientes e sua família estão muito satisfeitos, e nós avaliamos que a terapia está sendo bem-sucedida.

Hepatotoxicidade induzida por azatioprina em portadora da síndrome de Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada / Azathioprine-induced hepatotoxicity in a Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome patient

Este relato teve como objetivo apresentar um caso de hepatotoxicidade colestática induzida por azatioprina em portadora da síndrome de Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada. À admissão, apresentava icterícia +3/+4, acolia fecal e colúria, além de aumento de marcadores hepáticos, sendo compatível com síndrome colestática, cuja etiologia foi confirmada após exclusão de outras causas possíveis e retirada da azatioprina. A paciente evoluiu, após 1 semana de retirada do fármaco, com diurese livre de coloração menos escura e evacuação presente, sem acolia. Além disso, houve melhora nos exames que precederam a alta hospitalar

This report aimed at presenting a case of azathioprine-induced cholestatic hepatotoxicity in a patient with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. On admission, she presented with jaundice +3/+4, acholic feces, and choluria, as well as increased hepatic markers, all consistent with cholestatic syndrome, the etiology of which was confirmed after other possible causes were ruled out and azathioprine was discontinued. After 1 week of the drug discontinuation, the patient progressed with free diuresis of lighter color and defecation, with no acholia. In addition, tests performed before discharge were improved.

Clinical and laboratory data in pediatric autoimmune hepatitis: study from referral center in Iran / Datos clínicos y de laboratorio en hepatitis autoinmune pediátrica: estudio del centro de referencia en Irán

ABSTARCT Background : Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an auto-inflammatory liver disease of children and adults, affecting patients of any age, sex, race or ethnicity, with more prevalence in females. Objective : The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical manifestation, laboratory findings, and outcome of children with autoimmune hepatitis. Materials and methods : We evaluated 86 patients treated and followed with final diagnosis of AIH between years 2010 to 2018. Physical findings (including jaundice, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly and encephalopathy), liver enzymes, liver histology and autoantibodies (including ANA, Anti LKM-1 and ASMA) were extracted from medical files. Then the patients were followed for their final outcome (including response to medical treatment or successful treatment withdrawal, liver transplantation or death). Results : Among 86 patients with AIH with mean age 9.10±4.36 years old, 66.27% were females. Jaundice (75.6%) and hepatomegaly (46.5%) were the most frequent physical findings, followed by splenomegaly (32.6%) and encephalopathy (17.4%). Aminotransferases including AST and ALT were elevated at least 3 times more than upper limit of normal in most of the patients (61.6% and 55.81%, respectively). Autoantibodies were available in 53 of 86 patients, 24.5% had AIH-1, 3.8% had AIH-II and 67.9% were seronegative. Medical treatment including prednisolone and azathioprine was started for patients, 53 of 86 cases (61.6%) had remission and 11 of 86 (13.7%) tolerated medication withdrawal successfully. Among all cases, 26 (30.2%) patients needed liver transplantation. Mortality rate was 9 among 86 cases (10.5%). Conclusion : Jaundice and hepatomegaly was the most frequent clinical findings. Mortality rate was 10.5%.

RESUMEN Antecedentes : La hepatitis autoinmune (AIH) es una enfermedad hepática autoinflamatoria de niños y adultos, que afecta a pacientes de cualquier edad, sexo, raza u origen étnico, con mayor prevalencia en las mujeres. Objetivo : El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la manifestación clínica, los hallazgos de laboratorio y el resultado de los niños con hepatitis autoinmune. Materiales y métodos : Evaluamos 86 pacientes tratados y seguidos con el diagnóstico final de AIH entre los años 2010 a 2018. Los hallazgos físicos (incluyendo ictericia, hepatomegalia, esplenomegalia y encefalopatía), enzimas hepáticas, histología hepática y autoanticuerpos (incluidos ANA, Anti LKM-1 y ASMA) se extrajeron de las historias médicas. Luego, los pacientes fueron seguidos para su resultado final (incluida la respuesta al tratamiento médico o la retirada exitosa del tratamiento, el trasplante de hígado o la muerte). Resultados : Entre 86 pacientes con AIH con una edad media de 9,10 ± 4,36 años, el 66,27% eran mujeres. La ictericia (75,6%) y la hepatomegalia (46,5%) fueron los hallazgos físicos más frecuentes, seguidos de esplenomegalia (32,6%) y encefalopatía (17,4%). Las aminotransferasas que incluyen AST y ALT se elevaron al menos 3 veces más que el límite superior de la normalidad en la mayoría de los pacientes (61,6% y 55,81%, respectivamente). Los autoanticuerpos estaban disponibles en 53 de 86 pacientes, 24,5% tenían AIH-1, 3,8% tenían AIH-II y 67,9% eran seronegativos. Se inició tratamiento médico que incluyó prednisolona y azatioprina, 53 de 86 casos (61,6%) tuvieron remisión y 11 de 86 (13,7%) toleraron el retiro de medicamentos con éxito. Entre todos los casos, 26 (30,2%) pacientes necesitaron un trasplante de hígado. La tasa de mortalidad fue de 9 entre 86 casos (10,5%). Conclusión : la ictericia y la hepatomegalia fueron los hallazgos clínicos más frecuentes. La tasa de mortalidad fue del 10,5%.

Comparación entre dos esquemas de inmunosupresión en pacientes con trasplante hepático en un hospital universitario en Medellín, Colombia / Comparison of two immunosuppressive regimens for liver transplant patients in a university hospital in Medellín, Colombia

Introducción. El desarrollo de terapias inmunosupresoras en trasplante hepático ha sido uno de los aspectos fundamentales que ha permitido disminuir la presencia de rechazos y mejorar la supervivencia del injerto y de los pacientes. El presente estudio se hizo para conocer la efectividad de dos esquemas de tratamiento inmunosupresor en una cohorte de pacientes con trasplante hepático, entre 2006 y 2017, en un hospital universitario en Medellín, Colombia. Metodología. Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo donde se compararon dos esquemas de tratamiento inmunosupresor con ciclosporina (CsA) y azatioprina (AZA) versus tacrolimus (TAC) y micofenolato (MMF). Resultados. Se incluyeron 147 pacientes al estudio, 79 mujeres y 68 hombres, con una mediana de edad de 55 años. La tasa de incidencia de rechazo agudo en el grupo CsA/AZA fue de 7,3 y para el grupo TAC/MMF fue de 13,8, con una razón de tasas de 0,53 (IC95%=0,31-0,89) por cada 100 personas/año, siendo esta diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p=0,02). No hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos con respecto a la presencia de rechazo crónico, supervivencia del injerto o de los pacientes. Con respecto a los efectos adversos asociados al tratamiento, solo hubo diferencia significativa en una mayor presencia de diarrea en el grupo TAC/MMF. Conclusión. Solo se encontró diferencia significativa en cuanto a un número mayor de rechazos agudos en el grupo tratado con TAC/MMF. Estos hallazgos están en concordancia con la experiencia local, en la que en pacientes seleccionados se puede utilizar este esquema, con buenos resultados clínicos y menores costos para el sistema de salud. Hasta el momento, esta es la primera cohorte retrospectiva de Colombia y Latinoamérica que realiza una comparación, como la expuesta.

Introduction. The development of immunosuppressive therapies in liver transplantation has been one of the major contributing factors that have reduced the presence of rejections and improved graft and patient survival. The present study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of two immunosuppressive schemes in a cohort of liver transplant patients, between 2006 and 2017, at a university hospital in Medellin, Colombia. Methodology. A retrospective observational study was performed to compare two immunosuppressive treatment schemes with cyclosporine (CsA) and azathioprine (AZA) versus tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate (MMF). Results. A total of 147 patients were included in the study, 79 women and 68 men, with a median age of 55 years. The incidence rate of acute rejection in the CsA/AZA group was 7.3 while in the TAC/MMF group was 13.8, with a rate ratio of 0.53 (95%CI=0.31-0.89) for every 100 person-year, this difference being statistically significant (p=0.02). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the presence of chronic rejection, graft or patient survival. With respect to adverse effects associated with the treatment, there was only a significant difference in the presence of diarrhea in the TAC/MMF group. Conclusion. A significant difference was only found in terms of a higher number of acute rejections in the group treated with TAC/MMF. These findings are in agreement with local experience, in which this scheme can be used in selected patients, with good clinical results and lower costs for the health system. So far, this is the first retrospective study in Colombia and Latin America to make a comparison such as the one presented.

Aminosalicylates, thiopurines and methotrexate in inflammatory bowel disease: Is it possible to discontinue the treatment? / Aminosalicilatos, tiopurínicos y metotrexato en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, ¿es posible suspender el tratamiento?

The current goals of treatment in inflammatory bowel disease, both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are to achieve clinical, endoscopic and ideally histological remission and improve the quality of life of these patients. Current therapies are effective in achieving remission in most cases, but there is a lack of clear guidelines on their optimal duration. This review aims to evaluate the current evidence on the withdrawal of therapy with 5-aminosalicylates, thiopurines and methotrexate. We also aim to identify which specific group of patients, while in remission and in the absence of risk factors, may be able to discontinue therapy without a significant risk of relapse.

A Retrospective Study of Systemic Treatment of Severe Atopic Dermatitis With Azathioprine: Effectiveness and Tolerance in 11 Pediatric Patients. / Estudio retrospectivo del tratamiento sistémico de la dermatitis atópica grave con azatioprina. Eficacia y tolerancia en 11 pacientes pediátricos.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that typically affects children. Severe forms may have a profound effect on patients' quality of life. Some forms are resistant to conventional treatment and require the use of systemic immunosuppressants such as azathioprine (AZA) to adequately manage the disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of AZA in children with severe AD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of children with severe AD treated with AZA between January 2007 and May 2017. RESULTS: We reviewed the cases of 11 patients (6 boys and 5 girls) with a mean age of 13 years (range, 8-18 years). The mean (SD) age at start of treatment was 10.9 (2.2) years (95% CI 8.6-13.1). The mean initial dosage of AZA was 1.8 (0.2) mg/kg/d. We evaluated treatment response after 4 weeks, 12 to 16 weeks, and 6 months. Mean treatment duration was 10.8 (5.7) months. Treatment had to be suspended in 2 patients because of adverse effects. Seven of the 9 remaining patients presented complete or almost complete clearance of the AD after 6 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: In our experience, AZA is well tolerated and may be considered as a treatment option in children with severe AD resistant to conventional treatment.

Variantes genéticas de la tiopurina metiltransferasa e incidencia de eventos adversos en pacientes con indicación de azatioprina / Genetic polymorphisms of thiopurine methyltransferase and incidence of adverse events in patients with medical indication of azathioprine

La azatioprina es una tiopurina que presenta rango terapéutico estrecho y marcada toxicidad hematológica y hepática. La tiopurina S-metiltransferasa es una enzima que metaboliza ese grupo de drogas. Mutaciones en el gen que codifica dicha enzima aumentan el riesgo de presentar eventos adversos, por lo que su estudio farmacogenético permite contar con información para el diseño de la estrategia terapéutica. Sin embargo, su utilidad en el medio local no está completamente establecida. Fueron incluidos 45 sujetos (13 hombres) con indicación de azatioprina. Se determinó la presencia de las mutaciones *2, *3A, *3B y *3C de TMPT por PCR-RFLP y se analizó la relación entre el genotipo y la incidencia de eventos adversos relacionados al fármaco. Nueve portaban al menos un alelo no funcional, uno de ellos con genotipo *3A/*3A. Se detectó toxicidad en 3 de los 18 que iniciaron tratamiento con azatioprina: 2 pacientes con genotipo normal presentaron eventos adversos leves, y el único evento adverso de gravedad (aplasia medular) ocurrió en el sujeto con genotipo homocigota mutado. El único que presentó genotipo homocigota mutado desarrolló el más grave de los eventos adversos registrados, a pesar de estar en tratamiento con dosis bajas de azatioprina. Por este motivo, la determinación del genotipo de la tiopurina metiltransferasa pareciera ser de utilidad, pero no reemplaza la necesidad de seguimiento clínico y bioquímico en pacientes en tratamiento con tiopurinas.

Azathioprine is a thiopurine which has a narrow therapeutic index and marked hematological and hepatic toxicity. Thiopurine s-methyltransferase is an enzyme involved in the metabolism of thiopurines. Mutations in the gene that encodes the enzyme may augment the risk of adverse events. For that reason, pharmacogenetic determinations prior to the initiation of therapy can provide useful information for the future therapeutic strategy. Nevertheless, its utility in the local environment is not completely established. Forty-five subjects (13 men) who had been prescribed azathioprine were included. The presence of *2, *3A, *3B and *3C mutations were determined by PCR-RFLP, and the relationship between genotype and incidence of adverse events related to the drug was analyzed. Nine carried at least one non-functional allele, one of them with *3A/*3A genotype. Among the eighteen patients who initiated treatment with azathioprine, toxicity was detected in 3 cases: 2 mild events were observed in patients with normal genotype, and the only serious event (bone marrow suppression) occurred in the individual with homozygous mutant genotype. The only homozygous mutant patient developed the most severe of the registered events, in spite of being under treatment with low doses of azathioprine. This is the reason why enzymatic determination could be of utility, even though it does not replace clinical and biochemical follow-up in patients under thiopurine treatment.

Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on the use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease. / Recomendaciones del Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) sobre el uso de tiopurinas en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

Thiopurines (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) are widely used in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. In this paper, we review the main indications for their use, as well as practical aspects on efficacy, safety and method of administration. They are mainly used to maintain remission in steroid-dependent disease or with ciclosporin to control a severe ulcerative colitis flare-up, as well as to prevent postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence, and also in combination therapy with biologics. About 30-40% of patients will not respond to treatment and 10-20% will not tolerate it due to adverse effects. Before they are prescribed, immunisation status against certain infections should be checked. Determination of thiopurine methyltransferase activity (TPMT) is not mandatory but it increases initial safety. The appropriate dose is 2.5mg/kg/day for azathioprine and 1.5mg/kg/day for mercaptopurine. Some adverse effects are idiosyncratic (digestive intolerance, pancreatitis, fever, arthromyalgia, rash and some forms of hepatotoxicity). Others are dose-dependent (myelotoxicity and other types of hepatotoxicity), and their surveillance should never be interrupted during treatment. If therapy fails or adverse effects develop, management can include switching from one thiopurine to the other, reducing the dose, combining low doses of azathioprine with allopurinol and assessing metabolites, before their use is ruled out. Non-melanoma skin cancer, lymphomas and urinary tract tumours have been linked to thiopurine therapy. Thiopurine use is safe during conception, pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Practical Management of Immunosuppressants in Dermatology. / Manejo práctico de inmunosupresores en dermatología.

The treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases is challenging because of their frequency and complexity. Treatment of these diseases is based on the suppression of the patient's immune system using corticosteroids, corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, and biologic drugs, making an understanding of the management of immunosuppressive therapy essential. Before an immunosuppressive agent is prescribed, a study must be carried out to identify contraindications, detect latent infections, and determine the most appropriate dose. During treatment, regular monitoring is required to detect adverse effects. The clinician must be familiar with the time lag between start of treatment and onset of the immunosuppressive effect as well as the maximum recommended duration of treatment and cumulative dose for each drug. As dermatologists we are accustomed to using these immunosuppressive agents, but we should have a good knowledge of the guidelines for their use and the monitoring required in each case if we are to reduce variability and avoid potentially serious adverse effects.

Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica. Revisión narrativa de la literatura / Intersticial pulmonary disease in patients with systemic sclerosis. Narrative review of the literatura / Doença pulmonar intersticial em pacientes com esclerose sistémica. Revisão narrativa da literatura

RESUMEN Introducción: la esclerosis sistémica es una enfermedad autoinmune crónica, caracterizada por la tríada de vasculopatía de pequeños vasos, activación del sistema inmune y aumento de los depósitos de matriz extracelular tanto en la piel como en los órganos internos. En los últimos años, el compromiso pulmonar ha cobrado gran importancia, pasando a ser la primera causa de muerte, dada la disminución de la mortalidad por crisis renales con el advenimiento de los inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina. La afección pulmonar puede ocurrir como hipertensión o enfermedad intersticial difusa; esta última es más común en pacientes con la variedad generalizada, en los primeros tres años de la enfermedad. Tiene mal pronóstico si no se inicia el tratamiento, cuya meta es detener el deterioro de la función pulmonar. Entre los tratamientos disponibles, la ciclofosfamida cuenta con la mejor evidencia, pero se están estudiando, con resultados preliminares satisfactorios, otros tratamientos como micofenolato mofetil, rituximab, trasplante autólogo de células hematopoyéticas y trasplante de pulmón. Objetivo: describir, de acuerdo con lo reportado en la literatura, la epidemiología, la fisiopatología, los métodos diagnósticos y el tratamiento de la enfermedad pulmonar intersticial en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica. Métodos: revisión estructurada, no sistemática de la literatura, enfocada en los aspectos de interés, mencionados y que incluyó 52 artículos.

SUMMARY Introduction: Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease, characterized by the triad of small vessel vasculopathy, immune system activation and increased deposits of extracellular matrix in the skin and internal organs. In the last few years, pulmonary involvement has gained relevance since the introduction of angiotensin enzyme converter inhibitors with the subsequent decline in scleroderma renal crisis mortality, transforming scleroderma lung disease in the leading cause of mortality. Pulmonary involvement can manifest as hypertension or interstitial lung disease, which usually occurs in patients with generalized scleroderma in the first three years of the disease. Its prognosis is poor without treatment which is aimed at stopping pulmonary function deterioration. Among treatment options, cyclophosphamide has the best evidence, and mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, and stem cell and lung transplantation are currently under investigation with positive preliminary results. Objective: To describe, according to reports in the literature, epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Methods: Structured, non-systematic literature review, focused on the aforementioned aspects of interest. It included 52 articles.

RESUMO Introdução: a esclerose sistémica é uma doença autoimune crônica, caracterizada pela tríada de vasculopatia de pequenos vasos, ativação do sistema imune e aumento dos depósitos de matriz extracelular tanto na pele como nos órgãos internos. Nos últimos anos, o compromisso pulmonar há cobrado grande importância, passando a ser a primeira causa de morte, dada a diminuição da mortalidade por crises renais com o advento dos inibidores da enzima convertedora de angiotensina. A afecção pulmonar pode ocorrer como hipertensão ou doença intersticial difusa; esta última é mais comum em pacientes com a variedade generalizada, nos primeiros três anos da doença. Tem mal prognóstico se não se inicia o tratamento, cuja meta é deter o deterioro da função pulmonar. Entre os tratamentos disponíveis, a ciclofosfamida conta com a melhor evidência, mas se está estudando, com resultados preliminares satisfatórios, outros tratamentos como micofenolato mofetil, rituximab, transplante autólogo de células hematopoiéticas e transplante de pulmão. Objetivo: Descrever, de acordo com o reportado na literatura, a epidemiologia, a fisiopatologia, os métodos diagnósticos e o tratamento da doença pulmonar intersticial em pacientes com esclerose sistémica. Métodos: revisão estruturada, não sistemática da literatura, enfocada nos aspectos de interesse, mencionados e que incluiu 52 artigos.

Pseudotumor esclerosante de órbita / Sclerosing orbital pseudotumor

RESUMO O pseudotumor esclerosante de órbita é um subtipo raro de pseudotumor inflamatório idiopático de órbita. É mais comum em adultos e apresenta diagnóstico de exclusão. A primeira linha de tratamento são os esteroides. O subtipo esclerosante apresenta resposta moderada aos esteroides devido à predominância de fibrose e colágeno na histologia. Relatamos o caso de um paciente com diagnóstico histológico de pseudotumor esclerosante de órbita que teve boa resposta ao tratamento com corticoide associado à azatioprina.

ABSTRACT Sclerosing orbital pseudotumor is a rare subtype of idiopathic orbital inflammatory pseudotumor. It's more common in adults and presents diagnosis of exclusion. Steroids represent the first option of treatment. The sclerosing orbital pseudotumor subtype shows moderate response to steroids due to the predominance of fibrosis and collagen in its histology. We report on a case of a patient with histologic diagnosis of sclerosing orbital pseudotumor successfully treated with corticosteroid associated with azathioprine.