Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 147
Filter
1.
Cir Cir ; 92(3): 314-323, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38862107

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of overlap anastomosis and functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) in laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: The clinical data of 180 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of CRC and side-to-side anastomosis were retrospectively collected; the patients were divided into the Overlap group and FEEA group, according to the anastomosis method that was used to treat them. RESULTS: The Overlap group had a shorter operation time, anastomosis time, post-operative hospital stay, post-operative feeding time, and post-operative exhaust time than the FEEA group (p < 0.05). The total incidence of post-operative complications was 14.4% (13/90) in the FEEA group and 0.7% (6/90) in the Overlap group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overlapping anastomosis can shorten the operation time and accelerate the recovery of intestinal function without increasing the incidence of post-operative complications, and it will not affect the quality of life and survival of patients in the short term after surgery.


OBJETIVO: Investigar el efecto clínico de la anastomosis superpuesta y de la anastomosis funcional de extremo a extremo (AFEE) en la resección radical laparoscópica del cáncer colorrectal (CCR). MÉTODO: Se recolectaron retrospectivamente los datos clínicos de 180 pacientes sometidos a resección radical laparoscópica de CCR y anastomosis de lado a lado. Los pacientes se dividieron en grupo de anastomosis superpuesta y grupo AFEE, según el método de anastomosis que se utilizó para tratarlos. RESULTADOS: El grupo de anastomosis superpuesta tuvo un tiempo de operación, un tiempo de anastomosis, una estancia hospitalaria posoperatoria, un tiempo de alimentación posoperatorio y un tiempo de escape posoperatorio más cortos que el grupo AFEE (p < 0.05). La incidencia total de complicaciones posoperatorias fue del 14.4% (13/90) en el grupo AFEE y del 0.7% (6/90) en el grupo de anastomosis superpuesta, y no hubo diferencias significativas entre los dos grupos (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONES: La anastomosis superpuesta puede acortar el tiempo operatorio y acelerar la recuperación de la función intestinal sin aumentar la incidencia de complicaciones posoperatorias, y sin afectar la calidad de vida y la supervivencia de los pacientes a corto plazo después de la cirugía.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Colon , Colorectal Neoplasms , Laparoscopy , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colon/surgery , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Colectomy/methods , Adult
2.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 47(2): 140-148, feb. 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-230517

ABSTRACT

Background The COVID-19 pandemic created a backlog in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance colonoscopies. The real impact in Argentina is not fully known. Goal To estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CRC prevention by comparing the number of CRC screening and surveillance consults in a clinical decision support-tool used in Argentina before, during and after pandemic lockdown. Methods We analyzed data from May 2019 to December 2021 from CaPtyVa, a clinical decision support tool for CRC screening and surveillance. Queries were divided in pre-pandemic (May 2019 to March 2020), lockdown (April 2020 to December 2020), and post-lockdown (January 2021 to December 2021). The number of CRC monthly screening and surveillance visits were compared among the three periods and stratified according to CRC risk. Results Overall, 27,563 consults were analyzed of which 9035 were screening and 18,528 were surveillance. Pre-pandemic, the median number of screening consults was 346 per month (IQR25–75 280–410). There was a decrease to 156 (80–210)/month (p < 0.005) during lockdown that partially recovered during post-lockdown to 230 (170–290)/month (p = 0.05). Pre-pandemic, the median number of surveillance consults was 716 (560–880)/month. They decreased to 354 (190–470)/month during lockdown (p < .05) and unlike screening, completely recovered during post-lockdown to 581 (450–790)/month. Conclusions There was a >50% decrease in the number of CRC screening and surveillance consults registered in CaPtyVa during lockdown in Argentina. Post-lockdown, surveillance consults recovered to pre-pandemic levels, but screening consults remained at 66% of pre-pandemic levels. This has implications for delays in CRC diagnoses and patient outcomes (AU)


Antecedentes La pandemia de COVID-19 provocó atraso en las colonoscopias de detección y vigilancia del cáncer colorrectal (CCR). Objetivo Estimar el impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19 en la prevención del CCR comparando el número de consultas de pesquisa y vigilancia del CCR en una herramienta digital de apoyo a la decisión clínica utilizada en Argentina antes, durante y después del confinamiento. Métodos Analizamos datos entre mayo 2019 a diciembre 2021 de CaPtyVa, una herramienta digital de apoyo a la toma de decisiones clínicas para la pesquisa y vigilancia del CCR. Las consultas se dividieron en prepandemia (mayo 2019- marzo 2020), confinamiento (abril 2020- diciembre 2020) y post-confinamiento (enero 2021-diciembre 2021). El número de visitas mensuales de pesquisa y vigilancia de CCR se comparó entre períodos y se estratificó según riesgo de CCR. Resultados Prepandemia, la mediana de consultas de detección fue 346 mes (IQR25-75 280-410). Hubo una disminución a 156 (80-210)/mes (p<0,005) durante el confinamiento que ascendió a 230 (170-290)/mes (p=0,05) en el post-confinamiento. Prepandemia, la mediana de consultas de vigilancia fue 716 (560-880)/mes. Disminuyeron a 354 (190-470)/mes durante el confinamiento (p<0,05) y se recuperaron por completo durante el post-confinamiento. Conclusiones Hubo una disminución >50% en el número de consultas de detección y vigilancia de CCR registradas en CaPtyVa durante el confinamiento en Argentina. Post-confinamiento, las consultas de vigilancia se recuperaron a niveles prepandemia, pero las consultas de detección se mantuvieron en el 66 % de niveles históricos. Esto tendría implicaciones en los diagnósticos y pronósticos de CCR (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , /epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Neoplasms , Argentina/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Early Detection of Cancer , Pandemics/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies
3.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 47(2): 140-148, 2024 Feb.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36934841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic created a backlog in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance colonoscopies. The real impact in Argentina is not fully known. GOAL: To estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CRC prevention by comparing the number of CRC screening and surveillance consults in a clinical decision support-tool used in Argentina before, during and after pandemic lockdown. METHODS: We analyzed data from May 2019 to December 2021 from CaPtyVa, a clinical decision support tool for CRC screening and surveillance. Queries were divided in pre-pandemic (May 2019 to March 2020), lockdown (April 2020 to December 2020), and post-lockdown (January 2021 to December 2021). The number of CRC monthly screening and surveillance visits were compared among the three periods and stratified according to CRC risk. RESULTS: Overall, 27,563 consults were analyzed of which 9035 were screening and 18,528 were surveillance. Pre-pandemic, the median number of screening consults was 346 per month (IQR25-75 280-410). There was a decrease to 156 (80-210)/month (p<0.005) during lockdown that partially recovered during post-lockdown to 230 (170-290)/month (p=0.05). Pre-pandemic, the median number of surveillance consults was 716 (560-880)/month. They decreased to 354 (190-470)/month during lockdown (p<.05) and unlike screening, completely recovered during post-lockdown to 581 (450-790)/month. CONCLUSIONS: There was a >50% decrease in the number of CRC screening and surveillance consults registered in CaPtyVa during lockdown in Argentina. Post-lockdown, surveillance consults recovered to pre-pandemic levels, but screening consults remained at 66% of pre-pandemic levels. This has implications for delays in CRC diagnoses and patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Colorectal Neoplasms , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Neoplasms , Humans , Early Detection of Cancer , COVID-19/epidemiology , Argentina/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology
4.
Cir Cir ; 91(6): 785-793, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38096862

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second cause of cancer death in the world and is estimated to have been responsible for almost 935,000 deaths during 2020. OBJECTIVE: Describe clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in CRC patients under 30 years. METHOD: This is a retrospective cohort study in patients under 30 years diagnosed with CRC. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2021, 1823 patients were diagnosed with CRC, of which 54 (2.96%) were under 30 years. The OS, during 4 years, was 41.5%. The clinical stage found IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.212; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.504-15.414; p < 0.001), giving neoadjuvant therapy (HR: 0.705; 95% CI: 0.499-0.996; p = 0.047) and no medical history of Lynch syndrome (HR: 3.925; 95% CI: 1.355-11.364; p = 0.012) are independent predictors of mortality. The PFS, during 4 years, was 21.3%. Clinical stage IV (HR: 2.418; 95% CI: 1.000-5.850; p < 0.050), and no diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (HR: 3.800; 95% CI: 1.398-10.326; p = 0.009) are independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients are usually diagnosed with CRC in advanced stages. Early symptoms and evaluation, irrespective of age, are crucial.


ANTECEDENTES: El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer en el mundo y se estima que fue responsable de casi 935,000 muertes durante el año 2020. OBJETIVO: Describir las características clinicopatológicas, la supervivencia global (SG) y la supervivencia libre de progresión (SLP) en pacientes con CCR menores de 30 años. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo en pacientes con diagnóstico de CCR menores de 30 años. RESULTADOS: Entre 2017 y 2021 se diagnosticaron 1823 pacientes con CCR, de los cuales 54 (2.96%) eran menores de 30 años. La SG a 4 años fue del 41.5%. Se encontró que la etapa clínica IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.212; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 2.504-15.414; p < 0.001), recibir tratamiento neoadyuvante (HR: 0.705; IC95%: 0.499-0.996; p = 0.047) y no tener antecedente de síndrome de Lynch (HR:3.925; IC95%: 1.355-11.364; p = 0.012) son predictores de mortalidad independientes. La SLP a 4 años fue del 21.3%. La etapa clínica IV (HR: 2.418; IC95%: 1.000-5.850; p < 0.050) y el no contar con diagnóstico de síndrome de Lynch (HR: 3.800; IC95%: 1.398-10.326; p = 0.009) son predictores independientes. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes jóvenes son diagnosticados con CCR en etapas avanzadas. Los síntomas iniciales, junto con la evaluación, independientemente de la edad, son cruciales.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Proportional Hazards Models , Neoadjuvant Therapy
5.
Nutr. clín. diet. hosp ; 43(4): 244-251, 13 dec. 2023. graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-229954

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Evaluar el efecto in vitro de la combinación deChlorella sorokiniana con Vincristina contra el crecimiento decélulas de cáncer de colon HT-29.Material y método:Chlorella sorokiniana se cultivó enmedio López-Chuken. El efecto inhibitorio de la microalga solay en combinación con Vincristina en el crecimiento tumoral seevaluó mediante la técnica de MTT, contra células de cáncerde colon humano HT-29, y se analizó mediante el softwareSynergyFinder 2.0.Resultados: El crecimiento Chlorella sorokiniana fue cons-tante al día 28 a una temperatura de 34 oC ± 3 oC. El efectoinhibitorio de Vincristina sobre células HT-29 fue del 60% apartir de 0.0037μg/mL. La inhibición por Chlorella sorokinianafue del 60% al 80% a las concentraciones de 106-108.Además, la combinación de Vincristina/Chlorella inhibió el cre-cimiento tumoral entre 70% y 90%, siendo la concentraciónmenor de Chlorella la que mostró un mejor efecto en combi-nación con Vincristina. El análisis de los resultados enSynergyFinder mostró un score de -0.708, determinando unefecto aditivo. Conclusión:Chlorella sorokiniana presenta un efecto adi-tivo en combinación con Vincristina contra la línea de cáncerde colon humano HT-29. La suplementación de C. sorokinianaen la dieta de pacientes con cáncer de colon podría mejorarsu tratamiento y por consecuencia su recuperación (AU)


Objective:To evaluate in vitro the effect of the combina-tion of Chlorella sorokiniana with vincristine on HT-29 coloncancer cells.Material and method:Chlorella sorokininana growth wasconstant on day 28 at a temperature of 34 oC ± 3 oC. Chlorellasorokiniana was cultured in López-Chuken medium. HT-29 cellsgrowth inhibition by the microalga alone or in combination withvincristine was evaluated by the colorimetric reduction MTT as-say, and analyzed using the SynergyFinder 2.0 software. Results:The inhibitory effect of Vincristine on HT-29 cellswas 60% from 0.0037μg/mL. Tumor cells growth inhibition by106 to 108 Chlorella sorokiniana cells ranged from 60% to80%. The combination of vincristine and Chlorella inhibitedtumor cells growth from 70% to 90%, being the lower con-centration of Chlorella the one that showed a better effect incombination with vincristine. The analysis of the results inSynergyFinder showed a score of -0.708, determining an ad-ditive effect.Conclusion: Chlorella sorokiniana has an additive effect incombination with vincristine against the human colon cancerline HT-29. Supplementation of C. sorokiniana in the diet ofpatients with colon cancer may improve their treatment andrecovery (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Vincristine/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Chlorella/chemistry , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Tumor Cells, Cultured
6.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 75(5)oct. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1530074

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Reportar un caso clínico de acrometástasis de cáncer de colon. Materiales y Métodos: Se obtiene información de la ficha clínica electrónica. Se realiza revisión de literatura, utilizando los términos "acrometastasis", "metástasis óseas", "metástasis en la mano", "metástasis en falanges". Resultados: Se presenta el caso de un paciente con antecedente de cáncer de colon sigmoides etapa IV sometido a resección de metástasis hepáticas, quimioterapia y radioterapia. Consulta por lesión ulcerada en dedo anular derecho, cuya biopsia indica metástasis de adenocarcinoma de colon. Se realiza amputación transfalángica proximal con biopsia que confirma diagnóstico. Discusión: Las metástasis en mano dan cuenta del 0,0070,2% de todas las metástasis a distancia. Se presentan como aumento de volumen doloroso de aspecto granulomatoso o asociado a ulceración con empeoramiento progresivo. El tratamiento tiene por objetivo el manejo del dolor y la preservación de la funcionalidad de la extremidad. Conclusión: El adenocarcinoma de colon, raramente, da metástasis falángicas. Corresponden a una manifestación tardía de la enfermedad con una alta tasa de mortalidad a 6 meses asociada. Se deben considerar como diagnóstico diferencial en pacientes oncológicos.


Objective: To report a clinical case of achrometastases of colon cancer. Materials and methods: Information is obtained from the electronic medical record. A literature review is performed, using the terms "achrometastases", "bone metastases", "hand metastases", "phalangeal metastases". Results: We present the case of a patient with a history of stage IV sigmoid colon cancer who underwent resection of liver metastases, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Consultation due to an ulcerative lesion on the right ring finger, whose biopsy indicated colon adenocarcinoma metastases. Proximal transphalangeal amputation is performed with biopsy confirming diagnosis. Discussion: Hand metastases account for 0.007-0.2% of all distant metastases. They present as a painful increase in volume with a granulomatous appearance or associated with progressively worsening ulceration. The treatment aims to manage pain and preserve the functionality of the limb. Conclusion: Colon adenocarcinoma rarely gives phalangeal metastases. They correspond to a late manifestation of the disease with a high associated 6-month mortality rate. They should be considered as a differential diagnosis in cancer patients.

7.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 60(3): 339-344, July-Sept. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1513698

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in both men and women and ranks second as the most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Classic risk factors include tobacco smoking, high alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and excess body weight. A prospective study found that an elevated serum uric acid was associated with higher rates of cancer-associated polyps. Interestingly, other studies found an association between elevated levels of serum uric acid and other types of cancer including colorectal cancer. Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate whether patients with chronic tophaceous gout had an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. Methods: A validated multicenter and research platform database of more than 360 hospitals from 26 different healthcare systems across the United States was utilized to construct this study. Patients aged 18 years and above were included. Individuals who have had a history of familial adenomatous polyposis, a family history of colon cancer, and those diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease were excluded from the analysis. The risk of developing colon cancer was calculated using a multivariate regression analysis to account for potential confounders. Results: 80,927,194 individuals were screened in the database and 70,177,200 were selected in the final analysis after accounting for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Type 2 diabetics (28.57%), smokers (10.98%), obese individuals (18.71%), alcoholics (3.13%), and patients who have had a diagnosis of chronic tophaceous gout were more common in the colon cancer group compared to those without the malignancy. Using multivariate regression analysis, risk of colon cancer was calculated for male gender (OR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.01-1.03), smokers (OR: 1.54; 95%CI: 1.52-1.56), alcoholics (OR: 1.40; 95%CI: 1.37-1.43), obese patients (OR: 1.52; 95%CI: 1.50-1.54), type 2 diabetic individuals (OR: 3.53; 95%CI: 3.50-3.57), and those who have had a diagnosis of chronic tophaceous gout (OR: 1.40; 95%CI: 2.48-3.23). Conclusion: As expected, patients with colon cancer were found to have a higher prevalence in males, obese, tobacco and alcohol users. We also demonstrated that patients with gout have a significantly higher prevalence of CRC than those who do not before and after adjusting for metabolic risk factors. In fact, uric acid was found to induce production of reactive oxygen species, thus potentially promoting tumorigenesis. It would be interesting to assess the prevalence of colon cancer in patients with gout who have a serum uric acid that is less than 7 mg/dL. This might promote a tighter control of serum uric acid levels in this population in order to decrease the risk of colon cancer.


RESUMO Contexto: O câncer colorretal é o terceiro tipo mais comum de câncer em homens e mulheres e ocupa o segundo lugar como a causa mais comum de morte por câncer nos EUA. Os fatores de risco clássicos incluem tabagismo, alto consumo de álcool, inatividade física e excesso de peso corporal. Um estudo prospectivo descobriu que um ácido úrico sérico elevado estava associado a taxas mais altas de pólipos associados ao câncer. Curiosamente, outros estudos encontraram uma associação entre níveis elevados de ácido úrico sérico e outros tipos de câncer, incluindo o câncer colorretal. Objetivo: Nosso estudo teve como objetivo avaliar se os pacientes com gota tofácea crônica tinham um risco aumentado de desenvolver câncer colorretal. Métodos: Utilizou-se um banco de dados validado multicêntrico e de plataforma de pesquisa de mais de 360 hospitais de 26 diferentes sistemas de saúde nos Estados Unidos para a construção deste estudo. Foram incluídos pacientes com 18 anos ou mais. Indivíduos com histórico de polipose adenomatosa familiar, histórico familiar de câncer de cólon e aqueles diagnosticados com doença inflamatória intestinal foram excluídos da análise. O risco de desenvolver câncer de cólon foi calculado usando uma análise de regressão multivariada para contabilizar possíveis confusões. Resultados: 80.927.194 indivíduos foram rastreados no banco de dados e 70.177.200 foram selecionados na análise final após considerar critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Diabéticos tipo 2 (28,57%), fumantes (10,98%), indivíduos obesos (18,71%), alcoólatras (3,13%) e pacientes que tiveram diagnóstico de gota tofácea crônica foram mais comuns no grupo de câncer de cólon em comparação com aqueles sem a malignidade. Usando a análise de regressão multivariada, o risco de câncer de cólon foi calculado para o sexo masculino (OR: 1,02; IC95%: 1,01-1,03), fumantes (OR: 1,54; IC95%: 1,52-1,56), alcoólatras (OR: 1,40; IC95%: 1,37-1,43), pacientes obesos (OR: 1,52; IC95%: 1,50-1,54), indivíduos diabéticos tipo 2 (OR: 3,53; IC95%: 3,50-3,57), e aqueles que tiveram diagnóstico de gota tofácea crônica (OR: 1,40; IC95%: 2,48-3,23). Conclusão: Como esperado, os pacientes com câncer de cólon foram encontrados com maior prevalência em homens, obesos, usuários de tabaco e álcool. Demonstramos também que os pacientes com gota têm uma prevalência significativamente maior de câncer colorretal do que aqueles que não a têm, antes e após o ajuste para fatores de risco metabólicos. De fato, descobriu-se que o ácido úrico induz a produção de espécies reativas de oxigênio, promovendo assim potencialmente a tumorigênese. Seria interessante avaliar a prevalência de câncer de cólon em pacientes com gota que têm um ácido úrico sérico inferior a 7 mg/dL. Isso poderia promover um controle mais rígido dos níveis de ácido úrico sérico nesta população para diminuir o risco de câncer de cólon.

8.
Rev. Asoc. Méd. Argent ; 136(3): 4-7, sept. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1553342

ABSTRACT

Se define «síndrome febril prolongado¼ a todo cuadro de hipertermia que persiste al menos 10 días sin ser diagnosticado. El síndrome de Good es una inmunodeficiencia primaria del adulto que se caracteriza por presentar hipogammaglobulinemia, disminución de linfocitos B y anormalidades en los linfocitos T. Entre el 15 y el 20% de los casos de «fiebre de origen desconocido¼ ocurren debido a neoplasias, y el cáncer de colon representa menos del 1% de todos estos casos. Se presenta una paciente de 49 años admitida en el hospital por presentar síndrome febril con un mes de evolución, con antecedentes de síndrome de Good. Se le diagnostica cáncer de colon. (AU)


A prolonged febrile syndrome (PFS) is defined as any episode of hyperthermia that persists for at least 10 days without being diagnosed. Good's syndrome is a primary immunodeficiency in adults characterized by hypogammaglobulinemia, decreased B lymphocytes, and abnormalities in T lymphocytes. Between 15 to 20% of fever of unknown origin (FOD) cases are due to neoplasms, and colon cancer represents less than 1% of all these cases. A 49-year-old patient with a history of Good's syndrome was admitted to the hospital due to a febrile syndrome lasting for a month. She was diagnosed with colon cancer. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/complications , Hyperthermia/etiology , Comorbidity , Colectomy , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Fever of Unknown Origin , Laparotomy
9.
Cir. Esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 101(6): 426-434, jun. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-222018

ABSTRACT

Background: Colon cancer in elderly patients is an increasing problem due to its prevalence and progressive aging population. Prehabilitation has experienced a great grown in this field. Whether it is the best standard of care for these patients has not been elucidated yet. Methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study of three different standards of care for elderly colon cancer patients (>65 years) was conducted. A four-weeks trimodal prehabilitation program (PP), enhanced recovery program (ERP) and conventional care (CC) were compared. Global complications, major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), reinterventions, mortality, readmission and length of stay were measured. Optimal recovery, defined as postoperative course without major complications, no mortality, hospital discharge before the fifth postoperative day and without readmission, was the primary outcome measure. The influence of standard of care in optimal recovery and postoperative outcomes was assessed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: A total of 153 patients were included, 51 in each group. Mean age was 77.9 years. ASA Score distribution was different between groups (ASA III-IV: CC 56.9%, ERP 25.5%, PP 58.9%; p = 0.014). Optimal recovery rate was 55.6% (PP 54.9%, ERP 66.7%, CC 45.1%; p = 0.09). No differences were found in major complications (p = 0.2) nor reinterventions (p = 0.7). Uneventful recovery favors ERP and PP groups (p = 0.046 and p = 0.049 respectively). Conclusions: PP and ERP are safe and effective for older colon cancer patients. Fewer overall complications and readmissions happened in ERP and PP patients. Major complications were independent of the standard of care used. (AU)


Introducción: El cáncer de colon (CC) en pacientes de edad avanzada es un problema creciente por su prevalencia y envejecimiento progresivo de la población. La prehabilitación ha experimentado un gran crecimiento en este campo sin haberse dilucidado si es el mejor estándar de cuidados para estos pacientes. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo comparativo de cohortes de tres estándares diferentes de cuidados para pacientes mayores de 65 años con CC. Se compararon un programa de prehabilitación (PP) trimodal de cuatro semanas, uno de recuperación intensificada (RI) y cuidados convencionales (CC). Se midieron complicaciones globales, complicaciones mayores (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), reintervenciones, mortalidad, reingresos y estancia hospitalaria. La recuperación óptima fue la medida de resultado primaria. La influencia del estándar de atención en la recuperación óptima y los resultados postoperatorios se evaluó con modelos de regresión logística univariante y multivariante. Resultados: Se incluyeron 153 pacientes, 51 por grupo. La edad media fue 77,9 años. La distribución del ASA fue diferente entre los grupos (ASA III–IV: CC 56,9%, RI 25,5%, PP 58,9%; p = 0,014). La tasa de recuperación óptima fue del 55,6% (PP 54,9%, RI 66,7%, CC 45,1%; p = 0,09). No se encontraron diferencias en complicaciones mayores (p = 0,2) ni reintervenciones (p = 0,7). La recuperación sin incidencias favorece a los grupos RI y PP (p = 0,046 y p = 0,049 respectivamente). Conclusiones: PP y RI son seguros y efectivos para pacientes mayores con CC. Las complicaciones generales y reingresos en pacientes con RI y PP fueron menores. Las complicaciones mayores resultaron independientes del estándar de cuidados utilizado. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Aging , Prevalence
10.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 101(2): 90-96, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36774002

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected the management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to compare the diagnosis delay, symptoms, and stage of patients with CRC during the pandemic with a control cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients referred to the CRC multidisciplinary team between September 2019 and January 2020 (cohort 1, control group) were compared with those who presented between September 2020 and March 2021 (cohort 2, pandemic group). RESULTS: 389 patients were included, 169 in cohort 1 and 220 in cohort 2. No differences were observed in the main characteristics of the patients. CRC screening and anaemia were the most common causes leading to the diagnosis of the tumour in cohort 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). Diagnostic and therapeutic delay was longer in cohort 2 [6.4 (95% CI 5.8-6.9) vs. 4.8 (95% CI 4.3-5.3) months, p<0.001]. More patients required non-elective treatment in the pandemic cohort (15.5% vs. 9.5%, p=0.080). The tumour stage was more advanced in patients in cohort 2 [positive nodes in 52.3% vs. 36.7% (p=0.002), and metastatic disease in 23.6% vs. 16.6% (p=0.087)]. CONCLUSION: CRC patients in the pandemic cohort had a longer diagnostic and therapeutic delay and less patients were diagnosed because of CRC screening. In addition, patients with CRC during the pandemic needed non-elective treatment more frequently than patients in the control cohort, and their tumour stage tended to be more advanced.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Time Factors
11.
Cir. Esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 101(2): 90-96, feb. 2023. ilus, tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-215350

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Treatment of patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected the management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to compare the diagnosis delay, symptoms, and stage of patients with CRC during the pandemic with a control cohort.Material and methods: Patients referred to the CRC multidisciplinary team between September 2019 and January 2020 (cohort 1, control group) were compared with those who presented between September 2020 and March 2021 (cohort 2, pandemic group).Results: 389 patients were included, 169 in cohort 1 and 220 in cohort 2. No differences were observed in the main characteristics of the patients. CRC screening and anaemia were the most common causes leading to the diagnosis of the tumour in cohort 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). Diagnostic and therapeutic delay was longer in cohort 2 [6.4 (95% CI 5.8–6.9) vs. 4.8 (95% CI 4.3–5.3) months, p<0.001]. More patients required non-elective treatment in the pandemic cohort (15.5% vs. 9.5%, p=0.080). The tumour stage was more advanced in patients in cohort 2 [positive nodes in 52.3% vs. 36.7% (p=0.002), and metastatic disease in 23.6% vs. 16.6% (p=0.087)].Conclusion: CRC patients in the pandemic cohort had a longer diagnostic and therapeutic delay and less patients were diagnosed because of CRC screening. In addition, patients with CRC during the pandemic needed non-elective treatment more frequently than patients in the control cohort, and their tumour stage tended to be more advanced. (AU)


Introducción: La pandemia de la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 ha afectado al manejo de los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal (CCR). El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar el retraso diagnóstico, la sintomatología y el estadio de los pacientes con CCR durante la pandemia con una cohorte histórica. Material y métodos: Los pacientes valorados en el comité multidisciplinar de CCR entre septiembre de 2019 y enero de 2020 (cohorte 1) se compararon con los presentados entre septiembre de 2020 y marzo de 2021 (cohorte 2). Resultados: Trescientos ochenta y nueve pacientes fueron incluidos, 169 en la cohorte 1 y 220 en la cohorte 2. El cribado del CCR y la anemia fueron las causas que llevaron al diagnóstico en más pacientes en la cohorte 1 y 2, respectivamente (p<0,001). El retraso diagnóstico y terapéutico fue mayor en la cohorte 2 (6,4 [IC 95%: 5,8-6,9] vs. 4,8 [IC 95%: 4,3-5,3] meses, p<0,001). En la cohorte pandémica hubo más pacientes que requirieron tratamiento urgente (15,5% vs. 9,5%, p=0,080). El estadio tumoral fue más avanzado en la cohorte 2 (ganglios positivos en el 52,3% vs. 36,7% [p=0,002] y enfermedad metastásica en el 23,6% vs. 16,6% [p=0,087]). Conclusión: Los pacientes con CCR en la cohorte pandémica tenían un retraso diagnóstico y terapéutico más largo, y menos pacientes fueron diagnosticados en el cribado de CCR. Además, los pacientes con CCR durante la pandemia necesitaron tratamiento urgente con más frecuencia y su estadio tumoral fue más avanzado. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Spain
12.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) ; 88(3): 214-219, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35525791

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Colorectal cancer is among the three most common cancers worldwide. Knowledge and identification of suboptimal outcome-associated factors enable comprehensive patient management. The aim of the present study was to present the results of the surgical management of colorectal cancer at a quaternary care university hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, analytic, cross-sectional study was conducted. Information was collected on a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2017 at the Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia. RESULTS: Data on 452 patients, within the study period, were collected. A total of 48.5% of the patients were men, the overall complication rate was 24%, the surgical site infection (SSI) rate was 15.38%, anastomotic dehiscence occurred in 4.18% of the patients, bleeding required reoperation in 1.32%, and the intrahospital mortality rate was 7.47%. CONCLUSION: Colorectal cancer management at a university hospital was as beneficial as that provided by other types of hospitals, showing a direct association with complete R0 dissections; low complication rates, according to international reports; and reduced overall morbidity.

13.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 101(6): 426-434, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35724876

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer in elderly patients is an increasing problem due to its prevalence and progressive aging population. Prehabilitation has experienced a great grown in this field. Whether it is the best standard of care for these patients has not been elucidated yet. METHODS: A retrospective comparative cohort study of three different standards of care for elderly colon cancer patients (>65 years) was conducted. A four-weeks trimodal prehabilitation program (PP), enhanced recovery program (ERP) and conventional care (CC) were compared. Global complications, major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), reinterventions, mortality, readmission and length of stay were measured. Optimal recovery, defined as postoperative course without major complications, no mortality, hospital discharge before the fifth postoperative day and without readmission, was the primary outcome measure. The influence of standard of care in optimal recovery and postoperative outcomes was assessed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were included, 51 in each group. Mean age was 77.9 years. ASA Score distribution was different between groups (ASA III-IV: CC 56.9%, ERP 25.5%, PP 58.9%; p = 0.014). Optimal recovery rate was 55.6% (PP 54.9%, ERP 66.7%, CC 45.1%; p = 0.09). No differences were found in major complications (p = 0.2) nor reinterventions (p = 0.7). Uneventful recovery favors ERP and PP groups (p = 0.046 and p = 0.049 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PP and ERP are safe and effective for older colon cancer patients. Fewer overall complications and readmissions happened in ERP and PP patients. Major complications were independent of the standard of care used.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Preoperative Exercise , Humans , Aged , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Length of Stay , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/complications
14.
Rev. cuba. cir ; 61(4)dic. 2022.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1441531

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El modelo interdisciplinario en el ámbito oncológico ha permitido la vinculación entre diferentes disciplinas lo que permite aportar soluciones para elevar la calidad de vida de los enfermos y proporcionan una atención de excelencia. Objetivo: Explorar la evidencia científica sobre la colaboración interdisciplinar en el tratamiento del cáncer de colon. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación de tipo sistemática. Se ejecutó una búsqueda digital en las bases de datos de Web of Science, Lilacs, SciELO, Latindex, Elsevier, PubMed, Medline y Google de publicaciones actualizadas en inglés y español. Desarrollo: El enfoque interdisciplinario en el tratamiento de las enfermedades oncológicas, entre ellas el cáncer de colon, se ha descrito desde hace algún tiempo. El diseño permite vincular diferentes especialidades en las interconsultas y en el propio acto quirúrgico, lo que redunda en la formulación de problemas de investigación que requieren para su solución el intercambio de conocimientos y tecnologías de una especialidad a otra, permite aportar soluciones para elevar la calidad de vida de los enfermos y proporciona una atención de excelencia. Conclusiones: El cáncer es una enfermedad que requiere una atención para el paciente, no solo dentro de la esfera biológica; también psicológica, social y espiritual. Los equipos interdisciplinares, formados por profesionales de distintas disciplinas, son una herramienta que puede ayudar, en gran medida, a conseguir una mejor atención(AU)


Introduction: The interdisciplinary model in the oncological field has permitted connection between different disciplines, allowing to offer solutions for raising the quality of life of patients and provide excellent care. Objective: To explore the scientific evidence on interdisciplinary collaboration in the treatment of colon cancer. Methods: A systematic research was carried out. A digital search was carried out in the Web of Science, Lilacs, SciELO, Latindex, Elsevier, PubMed, Medline and Google databases, in view of identifying updated publications in English and Spanish. Development: The interdisciplinary approach in the treatment of oncologic diseases, including colon cancer, has been described for some time. The design allows connecting different specialties during interconsultation or the surgical act itself, which results in the formulation of research problems that require, for their solution, the exchange of knowledge and technologies from one specialty to another, allowing to offer solutions for raising the quality of life of patients and provide excellent care. Conclusions: Cancer is a disease that requires care for the patient, not only within the biological sphere, but also in the psychological, social and spiritual aspect. Interdisciplinary teams, made up of professionals from different disciplines, are a tool that can help, to a great extent, achieve better care(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Colonic Neoplasms/therapy , Review Literature as Topic , Databases, Bibliographic
15.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 74(5)oct. 2022.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1423762

ABSTRACT

Introducción: En Chile, el Cáncer colorrectal (CC) abarca el 11,5% de todas las neoplasias malignas. La cirugía es la piedra angular del tratamiento del cáncer de colon, y en pacientes en etapa III, la quimioterapia adyuvante forma parte del tratamiento estándar. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo transversal, de centro único, de pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio III patológico. Objetivo principal de este estudio es conocer si, en pacientes con cáncer de colon etapa III, la quimioterapia adyuvante se entrega de manera oportuna. Resultados: En el período comprendido entre abril de 2016 y abril de 2021 se operaron 35 pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio III patológico. Se realizó quimioterapia adyuvante en un 80%, y en siete pacientes durante las primeras ocho semanas poscirugía. La dehiscencia de anastomosis ocurrió en un 11,4%, aumentando la mediana de hospitalización en 2,2 veces. Discusión: En nuestro estudio, la adyuvancia en cáncer de colon etapa III se administró a un alto porcentaje de los pacientes (80%), pero observamos un retraso importante, ya que sólo en un 25% se inició el tratamiento durante las primeras 8 semanas poscirugía, lo cual puede ser explicado por múltiples factores, siendo la dehiscencia de anastomosis un punto importante a considerar. Conclusión: En estadio III de CC la adyuvancia puede verse retrasada por múltiples factores, lo que puede repercutir en la sobrevida de los pacientes, por lo tanto, conocer las causas de este retraso podría ayudar a instaurar nuevas estrategias, como la neoadyuvancia, para mejorar los resultados oncológicos.


Introduction: In Chile, colorectal cancer covers 11.5% of all malignant neoplasms. Surgery is the cor- nerstone of colon cancer treatment and in stage III patients adjuvant chemotherapy is part of standard treatment. Materials and Methods: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study, single center, of patients with pathological stage III colon cancer. Main objective of this study is to know if in patients with stage III colon cancer adjuvant chemotherapy is delivered in a timely manner. Results: Between April 2016 and April 2021, 35 patients with pathological stage III colon cancer were operated on. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 80%, and in seven patient during the first eight weeks after surgery. Anastomotic dehiscence occurred in 11.4%, the median hospitalization increased by 2.2 times. Discussion: In this study, adjuvant stage III colon cancer was administered to a high percentage of patients (80%), but we observed a significant delay, since only 25% began treatment during the first 8 weeks post-surgery, which can be explained by multiple factors, with anastomotic dehiscence being an important point to consider. Conclusion: In stage III CC, adjuvant treatment can be delayed by multiple factors, which may affect patient survival; therefore, knowing the causes of this delay could help to establish new strategies, such as neoadjuvant therapy, to improve oncological results.

18.
Cir. Urug ; 6(1): e502, jul. 2022. 1 vídeo en línea (7 min.)^cdigital
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1384413

ABSTRACT

El cáncer de colon es frecuente en nuestro medio. Aquellos situados sobre el colon derecho tienen peor pronóstico. La linfadenectomía D3 implica la resección de los ganglios centrales, por delante del eje mesentérico superior. Complementariamente, la escisión mesocolónica completa ha demostrado mejorar los resultados oncológicos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Laparoscopy/methods , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Audiovisual Aids , Video-Audio Media , Octogenarians
19.
Cir. Urug ; 6(1): e301, jul. 2022. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1384406

ABSTRACT

Los abscesos del psoas ilíaco secundarios a un tumor de colon fistulizado son excepcionales y potencialmente graves. La mayoría son adenocarcinomas de tipo mucinoso. Su tratamiento es complejo ya que, para lograr una resección oncológica pretendidamente curativa, es necesario realizar una resección ampliada con mayor morbimortalidad. Presentamos el caso de una paciente con un adenocarcinoma mucinoso de colon izquierdo fistulizado al músculo ilíaco y la pared anterolateral del abdomen en la que se realizó una resección multivisceral que incluyó el colon izquierdo, el músculo y la cresta ilíaca y parte de la pared anterolateral del abdomen.


Iliopsoas abscess secondary to perforation of colon cancer is an extremely rare and potentially life-threatening condition. Most tumors are mucinous adenocarcinomas. Its treatment its complex, as most patients need radical extended resections to achieve good oncological results, which are in turn, graved with higher morbidity and mortality. We present the case of a patient with a left colon mucinous adenocarcinoma penetrating to the iliopsoas muscle and the anterolateral abdominal wall that required a multivisceral resection including left colon, iliac muscle and crest and part of the anterolateral abdominal wall.


Abscessos do iliopsoas secundários a um tumor de cólon fistulizado são raros e potencialmente graves. A maioria são adenocarcinomas do tipo mucinoso. Seu tratamento é complexo, pois, para se obter uma ressecção oncológica supostamente curativa, é necessário realizar uma ressecção ampliada com maior morbimortalidade. Apresentamos o caso de um paciente com adenocarcinoma mucinoso de cólon esquerdo fistulizado para o músculo ilíaco e parede ântero-lateral do abdome no qual foi realizada ressecção multivisceral que incluiu cólon esquerdo, músculo e crista ilíaca e parte do a parede anterolateral do abdome.


Subject(s)
Female , Middle Aged , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/surgery , Intestinal Fistula/etiology , Psoas Abscess/etiology , Colectomy , Colonic Neoplasms/complications , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/complications , Abdominal Wall/pathology , Ilium/pathology
20.
Int. j. morphol ; 40(3): 855-859, jun. 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1385666

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN: Gran parte de los pacientes con cáncer de colon (CC), son diagnosticados y tratados de forma electiva. Sin embargo, aproximadamente un 20 % de ellos debutará como una emergencia (obstrucción o perforación). El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar morbilidad postoperatoria (MPO) y supervivencia global (SVG) en pacientes resecados por CC perforado (CCP). Serie de casos retrospectiva de pacientes con CCP, sometidos a colectomía y linfadenectomía, de forma consecutiva, en Clínica RedSalud Mayor y Hospital de Temuco, Chile, entre 2010 y 2019. Las variables resultados fueron SVG y MPO. Otras variables de interés fueron: tiempo quirúrgico, resecabilidad, número de linfonodos resecados, estancia hospitalaria, mortalidad operatoria, recurrencia y supervivencia libre de enfermedad (SLE). Los pacientes fueron seguidos de forma clínica. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva, con medidas de tendencia central y dispersión; y análisis de SV con curvas de Kaplan Meier. Se intervinieron 15 pacientes (60 % mujeres), con una mediana de edad de 62 años. La localización más frecuente fue sigmoides (6 casos; 40,0 %). La resecabilidad de la serie fue 100 %. La medianas del tiempo quirúrgico, número de linfonodos resecados y estancia hospitalaria; fueron 80 min, 20 y 5 días respectivamente. La MPO fue 26,7 % (4 casos). Con una mediana de seguimiento de 36 meses, se verificó una recurrencia de 40,0 %. Por otra parte, la SVG y SLE a 5 años fue 46,7 % y 33,3 % respectivamente. Los resultados obtenidos, en términos de MPO y SVG, fueron similares a series internacionales.


SUMMARY: Most patients with colon cancer (CC) are diagnosed and treated electively. However, a fifth of them will debut as an emergency (obstruction or perforation). The aim of this study was to determine postoperative morbidity (POM) and overall survival (OS) in patients resected by perforated CC (PCC). Retrospective case series of patients with PCC undergoing colectomy and lymphadenectomy, consecutively, at RedSalud Mayor Clinic and Temuco hospital, Chile, between 2010 and 2019. The outcome variable were POM and OS. Other variables of interest were surgical time, resectability, number of resected lymph nodes, hospital stay, mortality, recurrence, and disease-free survival (DFS). Patients were followed clinically. Descriptive statistics was used (measures of central tendency and dispersion), and OS analysis was applying Kaplan Meier curves.15 patients (60 % women) were intervened, with a median age of 62 years. The most frequent location was the sigmoid colon (6 cases, 40.0 %). Resectability of the series was 100 %. Median surgical time, number of lymph nodes resected, and hospital stay; they were 80 min, 20 and 5 days respectively. POM was 26.7 % (4 cases). With a median follow-up of 36 months, recurrence was 40.0 %. On the other hand, OS and DFS at 5 years were 46.7 % and 33.3 %, respectively. The observed results, in terms of POM and OS, were like international series.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colectomy , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/complications , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Colon, Sigmoid , Survival Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Emergencies , Lymph Node Excision , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...