Accreditation Approaches for Professional Education Programs: Towards Best Practice.

Accreditation has a central role in the quality assurance of professional education programs, but research on the effectiveness of different models of accreditation is limited. The purpose of this study was to rapidly appraise the evidence for the effectiveness, impact, and feasibility of different accreditation approaches, in order to inform best practices for the accreditation of professional education programs. The study focused on accreditation for programs which produce practice-ready graduates, including for veterinary programs. The authors searched several databases for articles published from 2000 to 2020, using search terms identified during a scoping phase, and applied a "rapid review" methodology in line with contextual, time, and resource requirements. Relevant articles which were classed as empirical or conceptual were included in the study, while papers appraised as solely commentaries or descriptive were excluded from the evidence base. The full-text review included 32 articles. We identified a clear transition in the literature from input- and process-based models (pre- and early 2000s) to outcomes-based models (in the 2000s and early 2010s). Continuous quality improvement and targeted models (including risk-based and thematic) represent more recent approaches in accreditation practice. However, as noted by other scholars, we identified limited empirical evidence for the relative effectiveness of different accreditation approaches in professional education, although evidence for the more recent accreditation approaches is emerging. In terms of best practice in view of the current lack of definitive evidence for the adoption of any specific model of accreditation, we argue that accrediting authorities adopt a contextual approach to accreditation which includes clearly articulating the purpose and focus of their regulatory activities, and selecting and implementing accreditation methods that are consistent with their underlying principles.

What to Teach in Small Animal Veterinary Orthopedics: A Survey of Practicing Veterinarians to Inform Curriculum Development.

Competency-based veterinary education focuses on the knowledge and clinical skills required to generate a productive and confident practitioner. Accurate identification of clinically relevant core competencies enables academic institutions to prioritize which new and foundational information to cover in the limited time available. The goal of this study was to aggregate the opinions of veterinary practitioners about small animal core competencies in veterinary orthopedics. An online 20-question survey was distributed with questions regarding respondent demographics, education, practice type, caseload, involvement in orthopedic procedures, access to referral hospitals, frequency of orthopedic condition presentation and procedure performance, and proposed percent allocation of various orthopedic curriculum topics. Responses were included from 721 respondents, largely first-opinion veterinarians (81%, n = 580/721). The majority (58%; n = 418/721) of respondents performed less than 10% of the orthopedic surgeries themselves and, 37% (n = 266/721) reported never performing orthopedic surgery; of those performing surgeries, 78% (n = 354/455) performed less than six orthopedic procedures monthly. The five most common orthopedic conditions seen included: generalized osteoarthritis, patellar luxation, cranial cruciate ligament disease, hip dysplasia/arthritis, and muscle/tendon injuries. Median respondent scores for the percentage which a topic should comprise in an ideal orthopedic curriculum were 20% each for 'orthopedic exam' and for 'non-surgical orthopedic knowledge', 15% each for 'non-surgical orthopedic skills,' 'orthopedic imaging (radiographs),' and 'surgical orthopedic knowledge,' 10% for 'surgical orthopedic skills,' and 2% for 'advanced orthopedic imaging.' Based on these results, a curriculum focusing on the most clinically relevant orthopedic conditions with an emphasis on diagnosis establishment and non-surgical treatments is proposed.

Longitudinal assessment of competency development at The Ohio State University using the competency-based veterinary education (CBVE) model.

With the development of the American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges' Competency-Based Veterinary Education (CBVE) model, veterinary schools are reorganizing curricula and assessment guidelines, especially within the clinical rotation training elements. Specifically, programs are utilizing both competencies and entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as opportunities for gathering information about student development within and across clinical rotations. However, what evidence exists that use of the central tenets of the CBVE model (competency framework, milestones and EPAs) improves our assessment practices and captures reliable and valid data to track competency development of students as they progress through their clinical year? Here, we report on validity evidence to support the use of scores from in-training evaluation report forms (ITERs) and workplace-based assessments of EPAs to evaluate competency progression within and across domains described in the CBVE, during the final year clinical training period of The Ohio State University's College of Veterinary Medicine (OSU-CVM) program. The ITER, used at the conclusion of each rotation, was modified to include the CBVE competencies that were assessed by identifying the stage of student development on a series of descriptive milestones (from pre-novice to competent). Workplace based assessments containing entrustment scales were used to assess EPAs from the CBVE model within each clinical rotation. Competency progression and entrustment scores were evaluated on each of the 31 rotations offered and high-stakes decisions regarding student performance were determined by a collective review of all the ITERs and EPAs recorded for each learner across each semester and the entire year. Results from the class of 2021, collected on approximately 190 students from 31 rotations, are reported with more than 55 299 total competency assessments combined with milestone placement and 2799 complete EPAs. Approximately 10% of the class was identified for remediation and received additional coaching support. Data collected longitudinally through the ITER on milestones provides initial validity evidence to support using the scores in higher stakes contexts such as identifying students for remediation and for determining whether students have met the necessary requirements to successfully complete the program. Data collected on entrustment scores did not, however, support such decision making. Implications are discussed.

Using the Five Core Components of Competency-Based Medical Education to Support Implementation of CBVE.

In recent years, veterinary education has begun the transition to competency-based models, recognizing that, like medical education, our goals include improved patient and client outcomes and the importance of learner-centered methods in education. Given that implementation of competency-based veterinary education (CBVE) is still in its relative infancy across many veterinary programs, we stand to gain from a unified approach to its implementation. As a guideline, the five core components of competency-based medical education (CBME) should serve to ensure and maintain fidelity of the original design of outcomes-based education during implementation of CBVE. Identified the essential and indispensable elements of CBME which include 1) clearly articulated outcome competencies required for practice, 2) sequenced progression of competencies and their developmental markers, 3) tailored learning experiences that facilitate the acquisition of competencies, 4) competency-focused instruction that promotes the acquisition of competencies, and 5) programmatic assessment. This review advocates the adoption of the principles contained in the five core components of CBME, outlines the approach to implementation of CBVE based upon the five core components, and addresses the key differences between veterinary and medical education which may serve as challenges to ensuring fidelity of CBVE during implementation.