ABSTRACT
Regardless of the number of vessels involved endovascular recanalization of mesenteric vessels is the treatment of choice for chronic mesenteric ischemia. Reperfusion injury post-endovascular recanalization in chronic mesenteric ischemia is a rare clinical scenario as it is mostly encountered in cases of acute mesenteric ischemia. Here in, we describe a case with characteristic clinical and imaging findings of reperfusion syndrome, post-endovascular recanalization of chronically occluded superior mesenteric artery and severely stenosed celiac trunk in a patient with chronic mesenteric ischemia.
ABSTRACT
Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is a vascular disorder primarily caused by atherosclerosis, resulting in intestinal ischemia. While endovascular treatment has become the primary modality for most patients, open mesenteric revascularization remains crucial for complex cases. We present a case of CMI in a patient with critical ischemia, leading to small bowel necrosis, where the endovascular recanalization failed and a surgical approach was needed. A supraceliac antegrade aortomesenteric bypass was performed, and successful revascularization of intestinal circulation was achieved. A novel prefabricated bovine pericardium tube was used as a graft, and the bypass was placed behind the pancreas to ensure maximal isolation from the contaminated abdominal cavity. Despite the intestinal revascularization, in the early postoperative period, the overall condition of the patient worsened with obvious signs of peritonitis. The second look operation revealed a ruptured gallbladder with severe biliary peritonitis, likely caused by the preceding splanchnic ischemia. A cholecystectomy, lavage, and drainage were performed. No further intestinal necrosis was observed, and the bowel passage was restored with latero-lateral jejuno-lejunostomy. The follow-up of the patient showed no signs of graft infection. Despite the complications, the patient's postoperative period was stable, and he was discharged on day sixteen. Regular follow-ups confirmed an excellent patency of the bypass.
ABSTRACT
Inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) aneurysms account for approximately 1% of visceral artery aneurysms and can occur secondary to high flow because of occlusive disease in other mesenteric arteries. We describe the case of a 79-year-old man who presented with a 3.3-cm IMA aneurysm and chronic total occlusions of the celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery (SMA). After an unsuccessful attempt at endovascular SMA recanalization, he underwent an uncomplicated retrograde aorta to SMA bypass and antegrade aorta to IMA bypass. We propose that an aorta to IMA bypass after SMA revascularization is safe and effective to treat suspected high-flow IMA aneurysms.
ABSTRACT
Due to the extensive collateral arterial network, symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischemia is a relatively uncommon condition and is associated with severe atherosclerotic disease of all major visceral arteries. Open surgical repair has been commonly used to restore blood supply to the visceral arteries, and the "roof-top" approach has been advocated as an alternative technique to traditional midline incision, mainly because of the great exposure of the suprarenal aorta that it offers. Roof-top approach, in other words, bilateral subcostal incision, is a totally abdominal approach to the suprarenal aorta, and as the title says, it is like a roof-top on the abdominal wall. We present a case of a female patient with intestinal angina that was deemed unsuitable for endovascular repair (ER) and was treated with open surgical repair utilizing the "roof-top" approach.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Clinical practice guidelines have recommended an endovascular-first approach (ENDO) for the management of patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI), whereas an open mesenteric bypass (OMB) is proposed for subjects deemed to be poor ENDO candidates. However, the impact of a previous failed endovascular or open mesenteric reconstruction on a subsequent OMB is unknown. Accordingly, this study was designed to examine the results of a remedial OMB (R-OMB) after a failed ENDO or a primary OMB (P-OMB) for patients with recurrent CMI. METHODS: All patients who underwent an OMB from 2002 to 2022 at the University of Florida were reviewed. Outcomes after an R-OMB (ie, history of a failed ENDO or P-OMB) and P-OMB were compared. The primary end point was 30-day mortality, whereas secondary outcomes included complications, reintervention, and survival. The Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate freedom from reintervention and all-cause mortality, whereas multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling identified predictors of death. RESULTS: A total of 145 OMB procedures (R-OMB, n = 48 [33%]; P-OMB, n = 97 [67%]) were analyzed. A majority of R-OMB operations were performed for a failed stent (prior ENDO, n = 39 [81%]; prior OMB, n = 9 [19%]). R-OMB patients were generally younger (66 ± 9 years vs P-OMB, 69 ± 11 years; P = .09) and had lower incidence of smoking exposure (29% vs P-OMB, 48%; P = .07); however, there were no other differences in demographics or comorbidities. R-OMB was associated with less intraoperative transfusion (0.6 units vs P-OMB, 1.4 units; P = .01), but there were no differences in conduit choice or bypass configuration.The overall 30-day mortality and complication rates were 7% (n = 10/145) and 53% (n = 77/145), respectively, with no difference between the groups. Notably, R-OMB had decreased cardiac (6% vs P-OMB, 21%; P < .01) and bleeding complication rates (2% vs P-OMB, 15%; P = .01). The freedom from reintervention (1 and 5 years: R-OMB: 95% ± 4%, 83% ± 9% vs P-OMB: 97% ± 2%, 93% ± 5%, respectively; log-rank P = .21) and survival (1 and 5 years: R-OMB: 82% ± 6%, 68% ± 9% vs P-OMB: 84% ± 4%, 66% ± 7%; P = .91) were similar. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality included new postoperative hemodialysis requirement (hazard ratio [HR], 7.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-17.3; P < .001), pulmonary (HR, 2.7, 95% CI, 1.4-5.3; P = .004) and cardiac (HR, 2.4, 95% CI, 1.1-5.1; P = .04) complications, and female sex (HR, 2.1, 95% CI, 1.03-4.8; P = .04). Notably, R-OMB was not a predictor of death. CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative and longer-term outcomes for a remedial OMB after a failed intraluminal stent or previous open bypass appear to be comparable to a P-OMB. These findings support the recently updated clinical practice guideline recommendations for an endovascular-first approach to treating recurrent CMI due to the significant perioperative complication risk of OMB. However, among the subset of patients deemed ineligible for endoluminal reconstruction after failed mesenteric revascularization, R-OMB results appear to be acceptable and highlight the utility of this strategy in selected patients.
Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures , Mesenteric Ischemia , Treatment Failure , Humans , Male , Female , Mesenteric Ischemia/surgery , Mesenteric Ischemia/mortality , Aged , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Chronic Disease , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Risk Assessment , Reoperation , Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion/surgery , Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion/mortality , Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion/diagnostic imaging , Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Recurrence , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Florida , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenting is the preferred approach for patients with symptomatic SMA-associated chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). The durability of this modality is impacted by in-stent restenosis (ISR). Duplex ultrasound (DUS) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA)-measured ISR may be weakly correlated and not uniformly associated with recurrence of presenting symptoms. This study aims to analyze the association between the degree of ISR for patients with CMI and to develop a predictive model for symptom recurrence. METHODS: Single center, retrospective study included all patients with CMI with SMA stents from the period of 2003 to 2020. Follow-up period analysis included patients' symptoms recurrence, DUS, CTA, and angiography. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate whether peak systolic velocity (PSV) was predictive of symptom recurrence. A subgroup analysis of patients (asymptomatic and symptomatic) with SMA ISR was identified; restenosis defined by DUS with peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≥350. RESULTS: The study included 186 patients with the ROC analysis obtained from 503 postoperative visits. PSV was not a predictor of symptoms return with area under the curve (AUC) = 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.57). Agreement analysis between imaging modalities showed higher agreement between CTA and angiogram (AUC, 0.769; 95% CI, 0.688-0.849) vs CTA and DUS (AUC, 0.650; 95% CI, 0.589-0.711). The subgroup analysis of patients with ISR included 99 patients (asymptomatic n = 67; symptomatic n = 32). There was no statistical difference between median time (months) to ISR between both groups: 4.5 (asymptomatic group) and 7.6 (symptomatic group). The use of preoperative antiplatelet (86% vs 65%; P = .015) and P2Y12 receptor blockers (36% vs 13%; P = .016) was more prevalent in the asymptomatic group. There was no difference between the type or number of stents placed, stent diameter, or concomitant celiac artery intervention between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The natural history of SMA and multimodality defined ISR in CMI has not previously been described. Elevated PSV was a poor predictor of symptoms recurrence. Both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with ISR did not differ in type of stent placed, time to ISR, or involvement of celiac artery. Antiplatelet use pre- and postoperatively appears protective against symptoms recurrence. Our findings underscore the need for long-term surveillance integrating clinical evaluation and multimodality imaging when indicated.
Subject(s)
Coronary Restenosis , Mesenteric Artery, Superior , Humans , Mesenteric Artery, Superior/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Constriction, Pathologic , Stents , Ischemia , Chronic Disease , Recurrence , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Ischemic hepatitis due to mesenteric artery occlusion is extremely rare. This is due to the function of the collateral network of the celiac-mesenteric arterial system and portal venous flow. A 64-year-old male presented with abdominal pain, a significantly reduced general condition, a weight loss of 20 kg in 4 months. Computed tomography showed occlusion of the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery and hypodense lesions in the liver. We performed an antegrade visceral reconstruction with a bifurcated 12-6 mm Dacron graft from the supra-celiac aortic donor to the superior mesenteric and celiac arteries. The postoperative course and follow-up were uneventful.
ABSTRACT
Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI), often known as abdominal angina, is a syndrome caused by a severe reduction in arterial flow to the digestive loops. It is an uncommon and underdiagnosed entity with potential severe adversities, such as acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are shown to also have mesenteric artery stenosis (MAS). By identifying risk variables, it may be possible to screen for mesenteric artery involvement in patients with CAD who exhibit an elevated risk. Here, we present a unique case of a person with severe retrosternal chest pain with postprandial angina, which turned out to be superior mesenteric artery (SMA) ostial stenosis.
ABSTRACT
Introducción:la isquemia mesentérica crónica (IMC) es una patología con alta morbimortalidad. La revascularización puede plantearse de forma escalonada con el fin de mejorar el estado nutricional del paciente. La isquemia no oclusiva es un tipo de isquemia mesentérica aguda que con frecuencia se manifiesta en el posoperatorio de una cirugía mayor o como complicación en un paciente crítico.Caso clínico:presentamos el caso de una paciente con IMC e isquemia crítica de miembros inferiores por enfermedad obstructiva aortoiliaca en el que se planteó una revascularización en dos tiempos. La paciente tuvo un posoperatorio tórpido como consecuencia de una isquemia mesentérica no oclusiva con desenlace fatal.Discusión:la isquemia mesentérica no oclusiva es un tipo de isquemia mesentérica aguda que puede manifestarse con dos tipos de patrones: bien en el contexto de una hipoperfusión sistémica, o bien en el de una hipoperfusión intestinal tras un evento precipitante como una intervención quirúrgica. El diagnóstico y tratamiento precoces son imprescindibles para intentar reducir unas tasas de mortalidad que alcanza el 70-90 % de los casos. El tratamiento endovascular es con frecuencia la primera elección aunque la cirugía abierta todavía juega un rol importante en casos de enfermedad extensa.(AU)
Introduction:chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is a pathology with high morbidity and mortality rates since its usually associated with severe systemic arteriosclerosis. Revascularization of visceral trunks can be staggered in order to improve the nutritional status of the patient. Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia is a type of acute mesenteric ischemia that frequently occurs in the postoperative period of major surgery or as a complication in critical patients.Case report:we present the case of a female patient with chronic mesenteric ischemia and critical ischemia of the lower limbs due to aortoiliac disease in which two-staged revascularization was performed. The patient had a torpid postoperative period as a result of a non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia which led to a fatal outcome.Discussion:non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia is a type of acute mesenteric ischemia that can occur in two contexts: either in a systemic hypoperfusion, or in the context of intestinal hypoperfusion after a precipitating event such as a surgical intervention. Diagnosis and early treatment are essential to trying to reduce mortality rates that reach 70-90 % of the cases. Endovascular treatment is often the first choice although bypass surgery still plays an important role in cases of extensive disease.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Mesenteric Ischemia , Lower Extremity , Indicators of Morbidity and Mortality , Endovascular Procedures , Inpatients , Physical Examination , Symptom Assessment , Cardiovascular System , Blood VesselsABSTRACT
La oclusión parcial de la arteria celiaca o tronco celiaco es una patología generalmente de origen ateroscleroso que puede ocasionar isquemia a nivel de las vísceras digestivas de la cavidad abdominal y especialmente del intestino. Tradicionalmente se ha considerado que para tener repercusión clínica debería de afectarse por lo menos dos de las tres arterias digestivas en mayor o menor grado y esta situación es la que se mostraba como base de la actuación quirúrgica terapéutica. Con la llegada de la era endovascular, con la posibilidad de realización de procedimientos quirúrgicos menos agresivos se han incrementado las indicaciones terapéuticas realizándose los procedimientos de forma preventiva para evitar el cierre u oclusión total del vaso arterial. Se realiza un estudio prospectivo de la experiencia del servicio con la utilización de procedimeintos endovasculares. (AU)
The partial occlusion of the celiac artery or celiac trunk is a disease generally of atherosclerosis origin that can cause ischemia at the level of the digestive viscera of the abdominal cavity and especially the intestine. Traditionally, it has been considered that in order to have clinical repercussion, at least two of the three digestive arteries should be affected to a greater or lesser degree and this situation is the one that was shown as the basis of therapeutic surgical action. With the arrival of the endovascular era, with the possibility of performing less aggressive surgical procedures, the therapeutic indications have increased, with the procedures being carried out preventively to avoid the closure or total occlusion of the arterial vessel. A prospective study of the services experience with the use of endovascular procedures is carried out. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Constriction, Pathologic , Celiac Artery , Endovascular Procedures , Celiac Artery/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
<p>We report a case of chronic mesenteric ischemia associated with severe aortic valve regurgitation and stenosis (ASR). The patient was a 76-year-old man who had been given a diagnosis of ASR in his 40s. He gradually developed heart failure and chronic kidney disorder due to deterioration of ASR. He had started hemodialysis 1 year before admission and had complained of abdominal pain after meals and weight loss during that period. He was admitted to the Department of Cardiology in our hospital for evaluation of ASR. Severe ASR with low output syndrome (C. I. 2.00 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>) were confirmed by cardiac catheter examination. In addition, abdominal angiography revealed total occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and severe stenosis of the celiac artery (CA). We considered that low cardiac output due to severe ASR had exacerbated the mesenteric ischemia. We performed AVR and abdominal aorta-SMA bypass at the same time to prevent acute mesenteric ischemia in the perioperative period. The combination of valvular disease and CMI is very rare. This is the first report in Japan of simultaneous valve replacement and mesenteric artery revascularization.</p>
ABSTRACT
Mesenteric ischemic symptoms appear only when two of the three major splanchnic arteries from the abdominal aorta are involved. Recently, we encountered a case of chronic mesenteric ischemia in a 50-year-old female patient caused by atherosclerotic obstruction of the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery. She was treated with a retrograde bypass graft from the right common iliac artery to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in a C-loop configuration. Complete revascularization is recommended for treatment of intestinal ischemia. When the celiac trunk is a not suitable recipient vessel, bypass grafting to the SMA alone appears to be both an effective and durable procedure for treating intestinal ischemia.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Aorta, Abdominal , Arteries , Cardiovascular Diseases , Glycosaminoglycans , Iliac Artery , Ischemia , Mesenteric Artery, Superior , Transplants , Vascular DiseasesABSTRACT
Mesenteric ischemia is caused by a reduction in mesenteric blood flow. It can be divided into acute and chronic, based upon the rapidity and the degree to which the blood flow is compromised. The authors retrospectively reviewed 22 cases of mesenteric ischemia, diagnosed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in our service, and confirmed by surgery or clinical follow-up. The frequency of the diagnostic findings of chronic and acute mesenteric ischemia was evaluated. The improvement of three-dimensional (3D) MDCT allows accurate assessment of mesenteric vessels. Therefore, it demonstrates changes in ischemic bowel segments helpful in determining the primary cause of the disease, and can identify the complications in patients with acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia.
A isquemia mesentérica é causada pela redução do fluxo sanguíneo mesentérico. Essa patologia pode ser dividida em aguda e crônica, baseada na rapidez e no grau em que o fluxo sanguíneo está sendo comprometido. Os autores retrospectivamente revisaram 22 casos de isquemia mesentérica, diagnosticados por tomografia computadorizada com mutidetectores (TCMD) em nosso serviço, e confirmados por cirurgia ou seguimento clínico. Os achados diagnósticos de isquemia aguda e crônica e sua frequência foram avaliados. Os avanços na TCMD 3D (tridimensional) permitiram o acesso detalhado aos vasos mesentéricos. Além disso, é possível demonstrar alterações nos segmentos intestinais, auxiliando na identificação da causa primária da doença e podendo identificar as complicações associadas a isquemia mesentérica e crônica.
Subject(s)
Humans , Ischemia/diagnosis , Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome/diagnosis , Chronic Disease , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, Emission-Computed/classificationABSTRACT
Idiopathic mesenteric phlebosclerosis (IMP) is a rare disease of chronic mesenteric ischemia characterized by a thickening of the colonic wall with fibrosis and calcification of the affected veins, which causes ischemic colitis. While the pathogenesis of IMP is unknown, characteristic radiographic, colonoscopic and histologic findings are evident. We report a case of IMP presenting with right lower abdominal pain and diarrhea in a 69-year-old woman. A plain abdominal radiograph revealed thread-like calcification in the colon. Colonoscopy showed dark purple-colored edematous mucosa and erosions in the colon. Histologic examination showed calcification in and around the submucosa and vascular wall. A barium enema demonstrated narrowing and thumb-printing from the ascending to the transverse colon. Abdominal CT disclosed a thickened colonic wall with intramural calcification and calcified mesenteric veins in the colon.