Helicobacter pylori resistance to clarithromycin in Reunion Island.

OBJECTIVE: The increasing resistance of Helicobacter pylori to clarithromycin led to developing new eradication treatment regimens. The objective of our observational study was to determine the proportion of H. pylori strains resistant to clarithromycin in infected patients in Reunion Island and to suggest a first-line treatment in agreement with the local ecology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 200 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the University Hospital of Saint-Pierre from February to July 2014. H. pylori was isolated from 73 patients. RESULTS: A wild-type susceptibility profile to clarithromycin was observed in 64 isolates (87.7%) and nine isolates (12.3%) had a resistant mutation profile. CONCLUSION: With a proportion of resistant strains below the critical threshold of 15%, physicians in Reunion Island may continue to prescribe the usual treatment regimen as a first-line option (clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and proton pump inhibitor for 14 days).

[Fixed drug eruption to clarithromycin: The importance of challenge tests in diagnosis]. / Érythème pigmenté fixe à la clarithromycine : importance des tests de provocation pour le diagnostic.

BACKGROUND: Determining the substance responsible for recurrent fixed drug eruption (FDE) may be difficult in the case of patients on multiple medication. Allergy testing may prove invaluable in such situations, as we demonstrate herein with an original case. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 49-year-old man presented a rash on the seventh day of treatment with esomeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin prescribed for gastritis involving Helicobacter pylori. The condition regressed spontaneously within a few days, but left three areas of hyperpigmentation. The patient subsequently reported four further episodes consisting of stereotypical reactivation in the areas of the three initial lesions and occurring 24hours after use of clarithromycin (2 episodes) and amoxicillin (2 episodes). The patient resumed proton pump inhibitor therapy (esomeprazole) without incident. Based on history taking, an initial diagnosis was made of multiple fixed drug eruption involving amoxicillin and clarithromycin. The initial skin allergy investigations were negative (patch-tests for amoxicillin and clarithromycin on healthy skin on the patient's back and on the affected area). After discussion, we decided to reintroduce the suspected drugs in succession. Beginning with clarithromycin, 12h after a single dose of 250mg, we noted an erythematous reaction on the pigmented areas, together with a burning sensation. In an identical challenge test with amoxicillin (500mg), the latter drug was perfectly well tolerated, ruling out the diagnosis of FDE to amoxicillin and thus the diagnosis of multiple FDE suggested by the patient history. DISCUSSION: FDEs to macrolides are rare, and herein we report a new case. Our observation confirms the diagnostic value of challenge tests in FDE. These tests should only be performed in the event of non-severe FDE, in other words not in bullous or systemic reactions, and they often constitute the only diagnostic approach possible, since skin tests are rarely positive during investigation for FDE.

To assess the influence of clarithromycine, amoxicillin and to find the risk factors of worry and phobia in children

Child; Amoxicillin; Pharmaceutical Preparations; risk factors; drugs; Phobic Disorders 90 children of 6-17 years old were divided into 3 groups: 30 children with phobia, 30 with phobia and general physical conditions, 30 in controlled group. The remarks are: physical illness, personality of children, family, school and social stress, overprotection of parents were various factors which increase the anxiety disorders and phobia