Impact of Mediterranean diet in lowering risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study

Introduction and objectives: The prevalence of gestational diabetes is increasing, and the Mediterranean diet is highly recommended for health. The objective of this study is to determine the relationship between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Materials and methodsIn this cross-sectional study the presence of GDM is the dependent variable, and socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics and adherence to the Mediterranean diet are the independent variables in this study, which was carried out in pregnant women who were 24–28 weeks pregnant and had Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT). Adherence to the Mediterranean diet was evaluated with the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Scale (MEDAS). Data were collected through face-to-face interviews, weight and height measurements of the pregnant women were made, and the diagnosis of GDM was made with OGTT.ResultsTwo hundred and seven pregnant women participated in the study and 85 of them (41.1%) were diagnosed as GDM. According to Logistic Regression models, age (OR: 1.088, 95% CI: 1.031–1.149) and infertility treatment (OR: 4.570, 95% CI: 1.443–14.474) significantly increased the occurrence of GDM, while adherence to the Mediterranean diet (OR: 0.683, 95% CI: 0.568–0.820) significantly reduced the risk.ConclusionsNearly two-fifths of pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM while only one-fourth complied with a Mediterranean diet. The increase in the frequency of GDM should be carefully monitored. It may be useful to detect risky pregnant women at the time of the first diagnosis, to measure their glucose levels, and to give suggestions about the Mediterranean diet in the early period. (AU)

Introducción y objetivos: La prevalencia de diabetes gestacional está aumentando y la dieta mediterránea es muy recomendable para la salud. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la relación entre la adherencia a la dieta mediterránea y la diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG).Materiales y métodosEn este estudio transversal la presencia de DMG es la variable dependiente, y las características sociodemográficas y antropométricas y la adherencia a la dieta mediterránea son las variables independientes de este estudio, que se llevó a cabo en mujeres embarazadas de 24-28semanas de gestación a las que se les realizó el Test de Tolerancia Oral a la Glucosa (TTOG). La adherencia a la dieta mediterránea se evaluó con la Escala de Adherencia a la Dieta Mediterránea (Mediterranean Diet Adherence Scale [MEDAS]). Los datos se recogieron mediante entrevistas cara a cara, se midió el peso y la talla de las embarazadas y se diagnosticó la DMG con el TTOG.ResultadosUn total de 207 embarazadas participaron en el estudio, y 85 de ellas (41,1%) fueron diagnosticadas de DMG. Según los modelos de regresión logística, la edad (OR: 1,088; IC95%: 1,031-1,149) y el tratamiento de la infertilidad (OR: 4,570; IC95%: 1,443-14,474) aumentaron significativamente la aparición de DMG, mientras que la adherencia a la dieta mediterránea (OR: 0,683; IC95%: 0,568-0,820) redujo significativamente el riesgo.ConclusionesCasi dos quintas partes de las embarazadas fueron diagnosticadas de DMG, mientras que solo una cuarta parte cumplían con la dieta mediterránea. Debe vigilarse atentamente el aumento de la frecuencia de la DMG. Puede ser útil detectar a las embarazadas de riesgo en el momento del primer diagnóstico, medir sus niveles de glucosa y dar sugerencias sobre la dieta mediterránea en el periodo inicial. (AU)

Gestational diabetes mellitus early prediction by maternal body fat index: A cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of maternal body fat index (BFI) assessed during the first 20+6 weeks among 138 pregnant women in an ultrasound outpatient clinic as a predictor of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) later in pregnancy. METHOD: Maternal visceral and subcutaneous fat was measured with a convex ultrasound probe placed in two locations on the maternal abdominal surface: the first in the mid-sagittal epigastric region, visualising epigastric fat, and the second 2cm above the maternal umbilical scar, visualising periumbilical fat. Ultrasound callipers measured the distance from dermal edge to the linea alba and after from the linea alba to the anterior hepatic surface (epigastric fat). Periumbilical fat was measured from the dermal edge to the linea alba and after from the linea alba to the anterior aortic surface. The BFI formula was [visceral adipose tissue (mm)×subcutaneous adipose tissue (mm)]/maternal height (cm). RESULTS: The best thresholds for predicting GDM outcome for epigastric and periumbilical BFI were 1.2 and 4.8, respectively. Odds ratio, sensitivity and specificity were 5.88 (95% CI 1.86-18.6), 80.9%, 58.0% for the epigastric site and 6.31 (95% CI 1.73-22.94), 84.2%, 54.2% for the periumbilical site. Pre-pregnancy body mass index compatible with adult obesity shows inadequate predictive performance for GDM outcome. Only epigastric BFI above 1.2 maintained statistical significance for GDM in the logistic regression analysis, when compared to periumbilical BFI above 4.8. CONCLUSION: Epigastric BFI above 1.2 during the first half of pregnancy may help identify women at risk of developing GDM later in pregnancy.

Glycemic variability in diagnosis of gestational diabetes as predictor of pharmacological treatment.

INTRODUCTION: To establish whether glycemic variability (GV) parameters used when gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been diagnosed could help predict the probability that a patient will need pharmacological treatment, and to analyze the link of these parameters to the development of maternal-fetal complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 87 women with GDM who underwent retrospective continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for six days between weeks 26 and 32 of gestation, following diagnosis. The mean glycemia levels and GV variables were analyzed together with their link to maternal-fetal complications, and the need for pharmacological treatment. ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves were developed to determine validity to detect the need for pharmacological treatment. RESULTS: Patients with higher mean glycemia (p < 0.001) and continuous overlapping of net glycemic action in a period of n-hours (CONGAn) (p = 0.001) required pharmacological treatment. The ROC curves showed cut-off points of 98.81 mg/dL for mean glycemia, and 86.70 mg/dL for CONGAn, with 83.3% sensitivity and 67.8% specificity for both parameters. No relation between the GV parameters and development of maternal-fetal complications was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CGM, once GDM is diagnosed, enables us to identify those patients who would benefit from closer monitoring during gestation, and facilitate a speedier take-up of pharmacological treatment. However, prospective studies involving a higher number of patients are needed, as well as a cost assessment for recommending the use of CGM following GDM diagnosis.

Evaluation of serum placenta-specific gene 8 protein, total antioxidant capacity, interleukin-10, interleukin-17A, interleukin-21 and interleukin-33 levels in Turkish women with gestational diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as carbohydrate intolerance that begins or is diagnosed during pregnancy. Our study aimed to establish a correlation between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory response in order to be able to develop treatment strategies and determine early diagnosis biomarkers in the sera of cases diagnosed with GDM. Moreover, we aimed to investigate interleukin (IL), placenta-specific gene 8 protein (PLAC8) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in patients with GDM. METHODS: A total of 121 patients were included in the study. These were divided into four patient groups: pregnant and diagnosed with DM (P-GDM, n=30); pregnant and not diagnosed with DM (P-NGDM, n=32); non-pregnant diagnosed with DM (NP-DM, n=29) and non-pregnant and not diagnosed with DM (NPNDM, n=30). IL-10, IL-17A, IL-21, IL-33, PLAC8 and TAC determinations from patients were evaluated by ELISA (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay) method. RESULTS: IL-10 and IL-33 concentrations were found to be significantly higher in P-GDM and NP-DM patient groups compared to P-NGDM and NP-NDM groups (p<0.001). The PLAC8 level in the P-GDM patient group (20.38±5.37) was determined to be significantly higher than in the P-NGDM patient group (3.41±2.17, p<0.001). TAC in the P-NGDM and NP-NDM groups (12.42±2.31 vs. 12.96±3.78, p<0.001) was determined to be significantly higher than in the P-GDM and NP-DM groups (4.8±0.52 vs. 2.21±0.71, p<0.001). DISCUSSION: The fact that the importance of PLAC8 level and TAC in the diagnosis and follow-up of GDM in pregnancy is demonstrated for the first time in this study shows that it is unique.

Impact of Mediterranean diet in lowering risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of gestational diabetes is increasing, and the Mediterranean diet is highly recommended for health. The objective of this study is to determine the relationship between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study the presence of GDM is the dependent variable, and socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics and adherence to the Mediterranean diet are the independent variables in this study, which was carried out in pregnant women who were 24-28 weeks pregnant and had Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT). Adherence to the Mediterranean diet was evaluated with the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Scale (MEDAS). Data were collected through face-to-face interviews, weight and height measurements of the pregnant women were made, and the diagnosis of GDM was made with OGTT. RESULTS: Two hundred and seven pregnant women participated in the study and 85 of them (41.1%) were diagnosed as GDM. According to Logistic Regression models, age (OR: 1.088, 95% CI: 1.031-1.149) and infertility treatment (OR: 4.570, 95% CI: 1.443-14.474) significantly increased the occurrence of GDM, while adherence to the Mediterranean diet (OR: 0.683, 95% CI: 0.568-0.820) significantly reduced the risk. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly two-fifths of pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM while only one-fourth complied with a Mediterranean diet. The increase in the frequency of GDM should be carefully monitored. It may be useful to detect risky pregnant women at the time of the first diagnosis, to measure their glucose levels, and to give suggestions about the Mediterranean diet in the early period.

Desfechos neonatais adversos e fatores associados entre gestantes com diabetes mellitus gestacional e de risco habitual / Neonatal adverse outcomes and associated factors among pregnant women with gestational and usual risk of diabetes mellitus

Objetivo: Avaliar os desfechos neonatais adversos e fatores associados entre gestantes com diabetes mellitus gestacional e de risco gestacional habitual. Métodos: Estudo transversal, de âmbito nacional e de base hospitalar, conduzido entre fevereiro de 2011 e outubro de 2012. Foram excluídas as mulheres com gestações múltiplas ou natimortos. As informações foram coletadas via questionário padronizado, cartão de pré-natal e/ou prontuário. Resultados: Das 12.712 puérperas avaliadas, 1.915 tinham diabetes mellitus gestacional e 10.797 foram classificadas em risco gestacional habitual. Verificou-se que 74,1% das mulheres com diabetes receberam assistência pré-natal adequada/mais que adequada em relação a 65% das mulheres com risco gestacional habitual. Em contrapartida, o grupo das mulheres com diabetes foi composto em sua maioria por mulheres acima de 35 anos, com hipertensão prévia, excesso de peso pré-gestacional e ganho de peso gestacional excessivo, multíparas, com histórico de cesárea e abortos. Os desfechos "prematuridade" e "nascimento de recém-nascido grande para idade gestacional" foram superiores entre as mulheres com diabetes. Conclusão: As mulheres com diabete detiveram condições demográficas, antecedentes clínicos/obstétricos e desfechos neonatais mais desfavoráveis em relação às mulheres de risco gestacional habitual. Apesar disso, o pré-natal foi um dos fatores que exerceu extrema importância para que outros desfechos negativos (óbito neonatal e o Apgar<5) não fossem superiores entre as mulheres com diabete sem relação às de risco gestacional habitual. Portanto, reitera-se o papel do pré-natal entre as mulheres brasileiras, sobretudo as de alto risco gestacional.

Objective: To assess adverse neonatal outcomes and associated factors between pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and usual gestational risk. Methods: Cross-sectional, nationwide, hospital-based study, conducted from February 2011 to October 2012. Women with multiple pregnancies or stillbirths were excluded. Information was collected using a standardized questionnaire, prenatal card and/or medical records. Results: Out of a total of 12,712 postpartum women evaluated, 1,915 had gestational diabetes mellitus and 10,797 were classified as usual gestational risk. It was observed that 74.1% of diabetics received adequate/more than adequate prenatal care compared to 65% of women with usual gestational risk. On the other hand, the group of diabetics was composed mostly of women over 35 years of age, with underlying hypertension, pre-gestational excess weight and excess gestational weight gain who were multiparous, with history of cesarean deliveries and abortions. The outcomes of "prematurity" and "birth of large-sized newborn" for the gestational age were higher among diabetics. Conclusion: Diabetic women had more unfavorable demographic conditions, clinical/obstetric history and neonatal outcomes compared to women with usual gestational risk. Nevertheless, prenatal care was a factor of extreme importance to prevent other negative outcomes (neonatal death and Apgar <5) to increase among diabetic women compared to those with usual gestational risk. Therefore, the role of prenatal care among Brazilian women is reiterated, especially among the high gestational risk women.

Factores de riesgo psicosocial asociados con la diabetes mellitus gestacional: revisión sistemática / Psychosocial risk factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review

La diabetes mellitus gestacional DMG es una enfermedad con consecuencias mortales, incapacitantes y costosas para las personas, las familias, las comunidades y los países. Con el fin de establecer de manera sistemática los factores de riesgo psicosocial asociados con la DMG que deberían ser monitoreados durante y después del embarazo se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos PubMed/Medline y Cochrane. Se encontraron 1188 artículos y se seleccionaron 41. Algunos temas principales fueron conflictos con prácticas culturales, estigma social, influencia de la etnia/raza, bajo nivel educativo, calidad del sueño, problemas con la lactancia materna, preocupación por la propia salud o la del bebé, baja percepción de riesgo de DMG o de diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en el futuro, estrés, ansiedad y depresión, conocimiento limitado, falta de apoyo de la pareja, de la familia o social y de los profesionales de la salud, bajos niveles de autocuidado/autoeficacia y dificultades con cambios en el estilo de vida. Estos factores deberían monitorearse en las embarazadas durante y después del parto. Los tratamientos deberían considerar el impacto psicológico y el riesgo de desarrollar diabetes mellitus tipo 2 después del parto, y deberían ser incluidos en las guías de práctica clínica. Las poblaciones multiétnicas y los grupos más vulnerables demográficamente y socioeconómicamente son más susceptibles de desarrollar DMG.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a disease with fatal, disabling, and costly consequences for individuals, families, communities and countries. To systematically establish the psychosocial risk factors associated with GDM that should be monitored during and after pregnancy. Systematic review in PubMed/Medline and Cochrane databases. 1188 articles were found and 41 were selected. Some main themes were conflicts with cultural practices, social stigma, ethnicity/race influence, low educational level, sleep quality, breastfeeding problems, concern for ones own health/baby, low perception of the risk of GDM/DM2 in the future, stress, anxiety and depression, limited knowledge, lack of support from the partner/family/social and health professionals, low levels of self-care/self-efficacy and difficulties with changes in the lifestyle. These factors should be monitored in pregnant women during and after delivery. Treatments should consider the psychological impact and the risk of developing DM2 after childbirth and should be included in clinical practice guidelines. Multi-ethnic populations and the most demographically and socioeconomically vulnerable groups are more susceptible to developing GDM.

Diabetes gestacional autorreferido - uma análise da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde / Self-reported gestational diabetes - an analysis of the National Health Survey

Resumo Introdução O diabetes mellitus gestacional é definido como qualquer grau de intolerância à glicose, diagnosticado pela primeira vez durante a gestação, podendo ou não persistir após o parto. Sua prevalência ainda é conflitante, mas os riscos oferecidos a mãe e feto são diversos. Objetivo Identificar as respostas positivas de mulheres sobre um diagnóstico de diabetes recebido na gestação e relacioná-lo a características sociodemográficas e do pré-natal, além de descrever as orientações recebidas frente ao diagnóstico. Método Estudo com característica transversal que utiliza dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013, conforme o autorrelato de diagnóstico de diabetes gestacional. Realizou-se análise bivariada e cálculo das prevalências e razões de prevalência, com intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC95%), considerando plano de amostragem complexa. Resultados O diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus gestacional no período pré-natal foi relatado por 106 mulheres, com uma prevalência ponderada de 6,6% (IC95% 5,0-8,5). Verificou-se associação entre o relato de diagnóstico na gestação com maior idade e cor não branca. A maioria das mulheres diagnosticadas recebeu orientações quanto aos riscos da doença, mas poucas foram encaminhadas para consulta com especialista. Conclusão Os resultados detalhados da PNS fornecem estimativas populacionais sobre a magnitude da doença e possibilitam identificar o conjunto de fatores associados ao DMG.

Abstract Background Gestational diabetes mellitus is defined as any degree of glucose intolerance that is first diagnosed during pregnancy and may or may not persist after delivery. Its prevalence is still conflicting, but the risks offered to mother and fetus are diverse. Objective To identify the positive responses of women about a diagnosis of diabetes received during pregnancy and to relate it to sociodemographic and prenatal characteristics, in addition to describing the orientations received regarding the diagnosis. Method A cross-sectional study that uses data from the 2013 National Health Survey according to the self-reported gestational diabetes diagnosis. A bivariate analysis was performed, and prevalence and prevalence rates with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated, considering a complex sampling plan. Results The diagnosis of prenatal gestational diabetes mellitus was reported by 106 women, with a weighted prevalence of 6.6% (95% CI 5.0-8.5). There was an association between the diagnosis report in older pregnancy and non-white color. Most diagnosed women received guidance on the risks of the disease, but few were referred for specialist consultation. Conclusion The detailed results of the PNS provide population estimates of the magnitude of the disease and make it possible to identify the set of factors associated with GDM.

Evaluación del polimorfismo Pro12Ala del gen PPARƴ en mujeres con diabetes mellitus gestacional / Evaluation of the Pro12Ala polymorphism of the PPARƴ gene in women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Resumen OBJETIVO: Determinar la frecuencia del alelo Ala en una muestra de mujeres mexicanas con diabetes mellitus gestacional y asociar su repercusión en la glucemia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio ambispectivo, observacional, transversal y correlacional efectuado en una cohorte de pacientes con diabetes gestacional atendidas entre los meses de enero a junio del 2014 en el Hospital Militar de Especialidades de la Mujer y Neonatología de la Secretaría de la Defensa Nacional en la Ciudad de México. Se evaluó el polimorfismo mediante amplificación de un fragmento de ADN mediante la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR) y su secuenciación. RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron 81 pacientes; 3 de ellas con el alelo Ala, con concentraciones de glucosa menores y antecedente de más abortos en comparación con las mujeres sin el alelo Ala. CONCLUSIONES: La coexistencia del alelo Ala en mujeres embarazadas con diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus gestacional pudiera tener un efecto protector en contra de la hiperglucemia en el embarazo y el riesgo de aborto.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARg) polymorphism of proline substituted with an alanine in amino acid 12 (Pro12Ala), in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and associate its impact with glycemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ambispective, observational, cross-sectional and correlational study was carried out in a cohort of women with gestational diabetes that included 81 pregnant women treated at the Military Hospital for Women's Specialties and Neonatology of the Ministry of National Defense in the city from Mexico. Polymorphism was evaluated by amplification of a DNA fragment by PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction and its sequencing. RESULTS: The results indicated that 13.5% of the women carriers of the Ala allele also had lower blood glucose values and a history with a higher number of abortions compared to women without the Ala allele. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the Ala allele in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus could have a protective effect against hyperglycemia in pregnancy and a risk of abortion.

Gestational weight gain influences neonatal outcomes in women with obesity and gestational diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are associated with an increased risk of perinatal complications and obesity in the offspring. However, the impact of gestational weight gain (GWG) on maternal and foetal outcomes is controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 220 women with GDM and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI)>30kg/m2. Pregnant women were classified according to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations regarding their prior BMI and GWG. We evaluated the impact of GWG on perinatal and obstetric outcomes. RESULTS: Mean maternal age was 34.7±5.3 years. Pre-pregnancy obesity was classified as class I in 55.3% of the cases, class II in 32.0% and class III in 12.7%. GWG was adequate (5-9kg) in 24.2%, insufficient (<5kg) in 41.8% and excessive (>9kg) in 34.2%. Birth weight was within normal range in 81.9%, 3.6% were small for gestational age (microsomia) and 14.4% were large for gestational age (macrosomia). Insufficient GWG was associated with a higher rate of microsomal offspring, excessive GWG was associated to macrosomia and adequate GWG with normal birth weight. CONCLUSION: GWG in women with pre-pregnancy obesity and GDM impacts neonatal birthweight. Insufficient GWG is associated with microsomia and excessive GWG is associated with macrosomia. Women with adequate GWG according to the IOM guidelines obtained better perinatal outcomes.

Factores psicosociales asociados con la diabetes mellitus gestacional: Revisión sistemática de alcance / Psychosocial factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus: Systematic review of scope

Resumen Objetivo: Hacer una revisión sistemática de alcance sobre los factores psicosociales asociados con la diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) para mejorar las intervenciones preventivas, evitar sus complicaciones y mejorar la calidad de vida de las mujeres embarazadas. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática con base a la metodología PRISMA en bases de datos PubMed/Medline y Cochrane sobre estudios de factores psicosociales en mujeres embarazadas, mayores de 18 años, con diagnóstico de DMG, publicadas en el periodo 2010 al 2020, en revistas revisadas por pares en cualquier idioma. La extracción de datos se hizo con un formulario estandarizado. Resultados: La búsqueda arrojó 1787 artículos, de los cuales se seleccionaron 102 según criterios de inclusión. Se encontraron como temas principales: conflictos con prácticas culturales, estigma social, influencia de la etnia/raza, bajo nivel educativo, calidad del sueño, limitaciones físicas, problemas con lactancia materna, preocupación por la propia salud/ bebé, baja percepción del riesgo de DMG y DM2 en el futuro, estrés/ansiedad/depresión, conocimiento limitado sobre DMG, falta de apoyo de la pareja/familia/social, bajos niveles de autocuidado/autoeficacia en el control glucémico, falta de apoyo de los profesionales de la salud y dificultades con los cambios en el estilo de vida. Conclusiones: Los factores psicosociales identificados deben integrarse a los programas de prevención y promoción existentes o en nuevas intervenciones. Las intervenciones no deberían finalizar con el embarazo si se tiene en cuenta el riesgo de desarrollar DM2 después del parto. Es necesario abordar las necesidades de poblaciones multiétnicas y grupos vulnerables demográfica y socioeconómicamente. Los factores psicosociales asociados con la DMG deberían incluirse también en el desarrollo de futuras Guías de Práctica Clínica.

Abstract Objective: To carry out a systematic review of scope on the psychosocial factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) to improve preventive interventions, avoid its complications and improve the quality of life of pregnant women. Materials and methods: A systematic review was carried out based on the PRISMA methodology in PubMed/Medline and Cochrane databases on studies of psychosocial factors in pregnant women, older than 18 years, with a diagnosis of GDM, published in the period 2010 to 2020, in peer-reviewed journals in any language. Data extraction was done using a standardized form. Results: The search yielded 1787 articles, of which 102 were selected according to inclusion criteria. The main themes were found: conflicts with cultural practices, social stigma, influence of ethnicity/race, low educational level, quality of sleep, physical limitations, problems with breastfeeding, concern for one's own health/baby, low perception of the risk of GDM and DM2 in the future, stress/anxiety/depression, limited knowledge about GDM, lack of partner/family/social support, low levels of self-care/self-efficacy in glycemic control, lack of support from health professionals and Difficulty with lifestyle changes. Conclusions: The identified psychosocial factors should be integrated into existing prevention and promotion programs or new interventions. Interventions should not terminate pregnancy if the risk of developing DM2 after delivery is taken into account. The needs of multi-ethnic populations and demographically and socioeconomically vulnerable groups need to be addressed. Psychosocial factors associated with GDM should also be included in the development of future Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Asociación entre diabetes mellitus gestacional y enfermedad periodontal: revisión sistemática / Association between gestational diabetes mellitus and periodontal disease: Systematic review

Objetivo: Determinar si existe asociación entre la enfermedad periodontal en las gestantes y el desarrollo de diabetes mellitus gestacional durante su embarazo. Materiales y métodos: La presente revisión se realizó en base a las directrices de la declaración Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA). Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en cuatro bases de datos: MEDLINE (vía PubMed), Cochrane Library, Scopus y Web of Science. Se incluyeron todos los trabajos encontrados hasta marzo del 2021. Los estudios que resultaron elegibles fueron evaluados a través de la escala de Newcastle-Ottawa en cuanto a su calidad metodológica. Resultados: De 161 estudios resultaron elegibles un total de 8 estudios, 3 de tipo caso-control, 2 de tipo transversal y 3 de tipo cohorte. En la mayoría de los estudios se verificó una asociación entre EP y DMG. Conclusión: La enfermedad periodontal aumenta el riesgo de desarrollar diabetes mellitus gestacional. Es necesario realizar más estudios con diferentes diseños, enfoque multicéntrico y distintas poblaciones para profundizar esta asociación.(AU)

Aim: To determine whether there is an association between periodontal disease in pregnant women and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus during their pregnancy. Objetive: To determine if there is an association between periodontal disease in pregnant women and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus during her pregnancy Methods: The present systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) guidelines. Four electronic data bases were searched: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science, through February 2021. Eligible studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: From 161 studies, 8 were eligible: 3 case-control, 2 cross-sectional and 3 cohort studies. Most of the studies supported an association between periodontitis and GDM. Conclusion: Periodontitis is associated with increased risk for GDM compared to woman without periodontitis. Future robust studies with different designs in distinct populations are needed to enlarge on these findings.(AU)

Incidencia de recién nacidos grandes para la edad gestacional y su asociación con diabetes mellitus gestacional y obesidad maternas. Estudio de cohorte en un hospital de Buenos Aires / Incidence of large-for-gestational-age newborns and its association with maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and obesity. Cohort study in a hospital in Buenos Aires

Resumen Introducción: existen dos términos para describir el crecimiento fetal excesivo: "grande para la edad gestacional" (GEG) y "macrosomía". GEG generalmente implica un peso al nacer superior al percentil 90 para una edad gestacional determinada. Objetivos: estimar la incidencia de recién nacidos GEG, y evaluar si la obesidad y la diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) son factores asociados. Materiales y métodos: estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de embarazadas -con y sin DMG- y sus recién nacidos vivos entre 2015 y 2018, evaluadas en el Hospital Italiano de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. La incidencia de recién nacidos GEG y de macrosomía se presentó como porcentajes e intervalos de confianza del 95% (IC 95%), así como sus complicaciones. Se utilizó regresión logística múltiple para evaluar si la DMG y la obesidad eran factores asociados a recién nacidos GEG. Resultados: la incidencia de GEG fue del 15,9% (IC 95%; 14,117,9) y de macrosomía del 6,7% (IC 95%; 5,5-8,1). La incidencia de recién nacidos GEG fue mayor en las mujeres con DMG y obesidad. La obesidad representó per se un mayor riesgo con y sin asociación con DMG. La obesidad, en presencia de DMG, incrementa la chance de recién nacidos GEG comparada con las mujeres sin DMG y sin obesidad (OR 2,41; p<0,001). Conclusiones: la DM y la obesidad materna incrementan el riesgo de GEG. Es importante implementar medidas preventivas e intervenciones en las mujeres en edad fértil con el objetivo de promover la salud de la madre y de su descendencia.

Abstract Introduction:two terms are used to describe excessive fetal growth: "large for gestational age" (LGA) and "macrosomia". LGA generally implies a birth weight greater than the 90th percentile for a given gestational age. Objectives: to estimate the incidence of LGA newborns and to assess whether obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are associated factors. Materials and methods: retrospective cohort study of pregnant women with and without GDM and their live newborns between 2015-2018 evaluated at the Italian Hospital in the City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. The incidence of LGA and macrosomia newborns is presented as percentages and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), as well as their complications. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess whether GDM and obesity are factors associated with LGA newborns. Results: the incidence of LGA was 15.9% (IC 95%; 14.1-17.9) and of macrosomia 6.7% (IC 95%; 5.5-8.1). The incidence of LGA newborns was higher in women with GDM and obesity. Obesity represented a higher risk per se with and without association with GDM. Obesity, in the presence of GDM, increases the chance of LGA newborns compared to women with GDM and without obesity (OR 2.41; p<0.001). Conclusions:diabetes and maternal obesity increase the risk of LGA. It is important to implement preventive measures and interventions on women of childbearing age with the aim of promoting the health of the mother and her offspring.

Evaluation of the relationship between HbA1c level and retina choroidal thickness in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus / Avaliação da relação entre o nível de HbA1c e a espessura coroidal da retina em pacientes com diabetes mellitus gestacional

ABSTRACT Purpose: To investigate the effect of hemoglobin A1c level on central macular thickness and central, nasal, and temporal choroidal thickness in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Methods: This retrospective study included 41 patients who had been diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus and undergone a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. They were divided into two groups based on their hemoglobin A1c level (group 1: hemoglobin A1c <6.0% and group 2: hemoglobin A1c ≥6.0%). All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination. The central macular thickness and central, nasal, and temporal choroidal thickness were measured using optical coherence tomography. Results: Of the 3,016 pregnant women screened, 7.5% (n=228) were diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus during the study period and 41 of these patients were included in the study. Group 1 comprised 48 eyes from 24 patients and Group 2 consisted of 34 eyes of 17 patients. The average body mass index values were 30.8 ± 3.3 and 35.1 ± 9.0, respectively (p=0.002). The insulin use rates were 29.2% and 76.5%, respectively (p=0.000). Mean central macular thickness values were 250.8 ± 14.3 µm and 260.9 ± 18.1 µm, respectively, and the difference was significant (p=0.008). Conclusions: Although the body mass index and central macular thickness values were significantly higher in Group 2, there was no difference in the central, nasal, and temporal choroidal thickness between the two groups.

RESUMO Objetivos: Investigar o efeito do nível de hemoglobina A1c (HbA1c) na espessura macular central e na espessura da coróide central, nasal e temporal em pacientes com diabetes mellitus gestacional. Métodos: Este estudo retrospectivo incluiu 82 olhos de 41 pacientes diagnosticadas com diabetes mellitus gestacional, as quais fizeram um teste de tolerância oral à glicose de 75 g entre 24 e 28 semanas de gestação. As pacientes foram divididas em dois grupos de acordo com o nível de hemoglobina A1c (hemoglobina A1c <6,0% e hemoglobina A1c ≥6,0%). Todas as pacientes foram submetidas a exame oftalmológico completo e, a espessura macular central, a espessura central, nasal e temporal da coroide foram mensuradas por tomografia de coerência óptica. Resultados: Durante o período do estudo, das 3.016 gestantes triadas, 7,5% (n=228) foram diagnosticadas com diabetes mellitus gestacional. Destas, 41 pacientes foram analisadas de acordo com os critérios do estudo. Houve 48 olhos de 24 pacientes no primeiro grupo com hemoglobina A1c <6,0% e 34 olhos de 17 pacientes no segundo grupo com hemoglobina A1c ≥6,0%. Os valores médios do índice de massa corporal foram de 30,8 ± 3,3 e 35,1 ± 9,0, respectivamente (p=0,002). As taxas referentes ao uso de insulina foram de 29,2% e 76,5%, respectivamente (p=0,000). Os valores médios da espessura macular central foram medidos em 250,8 ± 14,3 µm e 260,9 ± 18,1 µm, respectivamente e a diferença foi significativa entre os dois grupos (p=0,008). Conclusões: Embora os valores do índice de massa corporal e da espessura macular central tenham sido significativamente maiores no Grupo 2 com hemoglobina A1c alta, não houve diferenças nas medidas de espessura coroidal central, nasal e temporal entre os dois grupos.

Factores de riesgo asociados a la diabetes mellitus gestacional / Risk factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus

Introducción: La diabetes mellitus gestacional presenta una serie de complicaciones en la mujer embarazada y su hijo, lo cual puede incrementar la morbilidad en las gestantes o la descendencia. Objetivos: Determinar los factores de riesgo asociados a la diabetes mellitus gestacional. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo y transversal de las pacientes con este diagnóstico, perteneciente a la comunidad del Policlínico Universitario Pedro Borrás Astorga, Pinar del Río, durante los años 2014 al 2018. De un universo de 1623 mujeres embarazadas atendidas en el período estudiado, se tomó una muestra de 59 gestantes con diabetes mellitus gestacional. Se utilizó la estadística descriptiva. Los resultados se presentaron en tablas y gráficos. Resultados: La incidencia de la enfermedad fue de un 3,6 por ciento, en edades entre 26-30 años, no hubo adolescentes diagnosticadas en el período estudiado. Como antecedentes previos estuvieron los abortos y la nuliparidad. Prevaleció el parto transpelviano y las complicaciones a corto plazo del hijo fueron: la macrosomía, la hipoglucemia neonatal y la distocia de hombro. No hubo muerte perinatal causada por este padecimiento. Conclusiones: La diabetes mellitus gestacional se relaciona con algunos factores de riesgo, lo que puede provocar complicaciones para la madre y el feto en el período perinatal(AU)

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus presents a series of complications for both the pregnant woman and her child, which can increase morbidity in pregnant women or the offspring. Objective: To determine the risk factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus. Methods: A descriptive, retrospective and cross-sectional study was carried out with patients with the aforementioned diagnosis, belonging to the community of Pedro Borras Astorga University Polyclinic, Pinar del Rio Cuba, during the years 2014 to 2018. From a universe of 1623 pregnant women attended in the studied period, a sample of 59 pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus was taken. Descriptive statistics was used. The results were shown in tables and graphs. Results: The incidence of the disease was 3.6 percent, ages were between 26 and 30 years, and there were no adolescents diagnosed in the period studied. Previous history included abortions and nulliparity. Transpelvic delivery prevailed, while the short-term complications of the child were macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia and shoulder dystocia. There was no perinatal death caused by the studied condition. Conclusions: Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with some risk factors, which may lead to complications for the mother and the in the perinatal period(AU)

Enfermedad periodontal y diabetes mellitus gestacional: estudio caso-control / Periodontal disease and gestational diabetes mellitus: a case-control study

Antecedentes: Los estudios que relacionan la enfermedad periodontal (EP) y la diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) no son concordantes. Nuestro objetivo principal es evaluar la posible asociación entre la EP y la DMG. Además, analizamos los factores de riesgo para la DMG en nuestra muestra. Métodos: Participaron 180 gestantes, 90 con DMG y 90 controles, del Hospital La Fe de Valencia. Se pasó un cuestionario y realizo un examen periodontal, valorándose los siguientes parámetros: número de dientes, índices de placa y sangrado al sondaje, profundidad de sondaje (PS) y nivel de inserción de clínica (NIC). La periodontitis se definió según criterios de la CDC-AAP. Resultados: Las DMG tuvieron mayor valor promedio de PS (p = 0,001) y NIC (p = 0,028). Un 74,4% de las pacientes con DMG presentaron inflamación gingival vs. 57,8% de las no diabéticas. La periodontitis fue más prevalente en las pacientes con DMG (p < 0,05). La edad materna, el nivel de estudios y la presencia de periodontitis son factores independientes de riesgo para la DMG (OR = 1,16, IC 95% 1,07 a 1,25, p < 0,001), (OR = 0,37, IC 95% 0,19 a 0,72, p < 0,005) y (OR = 2,79, IC 95% 1,40 a 5,59, p < 0,005), respectivamente. Conclusiones: Los resultados sugieren que las embarazadas con diabetes gestacional asocian más enfermedad periodontal que aquellas sin dicha enfermedad gestacional. En nuestra muestra el riesgo de DMG puede estimarse a partir de la periodontitis, la edad y el nivel de estudios.(AU)

Background: Studies linking periodontal disease (PD) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are not consistent. Our main objective is to evaluate the possible association between PD and GDM. We also analysed the risk factors for GDM in our sample. Methods: 180 pregnant women participated, 90 with GDM and 90 controls, from Valencia's Hospital La Fe. A questionnaire was completed and a periodontal examination was performed, assessing the following parameters: number of teeth, plaque and bleeding on probing indices, probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL). Periodontitis was defined according to the criteria of CDC-AAP. Results: The GDM group had a higher mean value of PD (p = .001) and CAL (p = .028). Of the patients with GDM, 74.4% had gingival inflammation compared to 57.8% of the non-diabetic patients. Periodontitis was more prevalent in patients with GDM (p < .05). Maternal age, educational level and periodontitis are independent risk factors for GDM (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.25, p < .001), (OR = .37, 95% CI .19 to .72, p < .005) and (OR = 2.79, 95% CI 1.40 to 5.59, p < .005) respectively. Conclusions: The results suggest that pregnant women with gestational diabetes have more associated periodontal disease than those without gestational diabetes. In our sample, the risk for GDM can be estimated from periodontitis, age, and educational level.(AU)

Hemoglobina glucosilada en el diagnóstico de diabetes gestacional en mujeres mexicanas durante el tercer trimestre / Glycosylated hemoglobin in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in Mexican women during the third trimester

Resumen El objetivo del trabajo fue analizar los valores de hemoglobina glucosilada en el tercer trimestre de embarazo como predictores alternativos de la diabetes gestacional en pacientes del Noreste de México. Se trata de un estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles a partir de 121 expedientes de pacientes embarazadas, divididos en dos grupos, pacientes con diabetes gestacional (casos) y gestantes con valores glucémicos normales (controles). Se analizaron los factores de riesgo asociados a la diabetes gestacional y se obtuvo un punto de corte para la hemoglobina glucosilada. Se encontró que la obesidad materna, la edad y el antecedente del padecimiento fueron asociados significativamente con la diabetes gestacional. Valores de hemoglobina glucosilada ≥5% incrementaron el riesgo de padecer diabetes mellitus gestacional 4 veces y, aunado a un factor de riesgo, la probabilidad se incrementó 7 veces. Se concluye que los valores de hemoglobina glucosilada en el tercer trimestre de embarazo podrían emplearse como prueba diagnóstica de la diabetes gestacional en pacientes del Noreste de México. Sin embargo, aunque las diferencias encontradas fueron estadísticamente significativas, los resultados se deben interpretar con cautela y requieren su confirmación con estudios que incluyan una muestra mayor.

Abstract The objective of this study was to analise glycosylated hemoglobin values in the third trimester of pregnancy as an alternative predictor of gestational diabetes in North East Mexican cohort patients. This is a retrospective case-control study based on 121 records of pregnant patients, divided into two groups, patients with gestational diabetes (cases) and pregnant women with normal glycemic values (control). The risk factors associated with gestational diabetes were analised and a cut-off point for glycosylated hemogestaglobin was obtained. It was found that maternal obesity, age and a history of the condition were significantly associated with gestational diabetes. Values of glycosylated hemoglobin ≥5% increased the risk of suffering from gestational diabetes 4 times, and coupled with a risk factor, the risk increased 7 times. It is concluded that glycosylated hemoglobin values in the third trimester of pregnancy could be used as a diagnostic test for gestational diabetes in patients from the North East of Mexico. Although the differences found were statistically significant, our results must be interpreted with caution and require confirmation by studies with a larger sample.

Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar os valores da hemoglobina glicada no terceiro trimestre de gestação como preditores alternativos do diabetes gestacional em pacientes na região nordeste do México. Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo de casos e controles utilizando 121 prontuários de gestantes divididas em dois grupos; pacientes com diabetes gestacional (casos) e gestantes com valores de glicemia normais (controles). Foram analisados os fatores de risco associados a diabetes gestacional obtendo-se um ponto de corte para a hemoglobina glicada. Descobriu-se que a obesidade materna, idade e antecedentes da doença foram associados significativamente ao diabetes gestacional. Valores da hemoglobina glicada ≥ 5% aumentaram o risco de padecer diabetes mellitus gestacional 4 vezes, e juntamente a um fator de risco, a probabilidade aumentou 7 vezes. Conclui-se que os valores da hemoglobina glicada no terceiro trimestre de gestação poderiam ser usados como teste diagnóstico do diabetes gestacional em pacientes da região nordeste do México. Embora as diferenças encontradas tenham sido estatisticamente significativas, os resultados devem ser interpretados com cautela e requerem confirmação através de estudos que incluam uma amostra maior.

General practitioners' knowledge about pregnancy complications associated with long-term cardiovascular risk.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in women; preeclampsia (PE) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are associated with an increased risk of CVD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate general practitioners (GP) knowledge about complicated pregnancies and their association with CVD. METHODS: An anonymous case-based electronic questionnaire designed to assess the level of understanding on the influence of a history of pregnancy complications on long-term cardiovascular risk and general knowledge about CVD risk was sent to GPs. RESULTS: The response rate was 35 % (161/465). The participants recognized that PE and GDM are risk factors for CVD (98 and 83 %, respectively), and reported the following CVD screening strategies in women with a history of PE and GDM: blood pressure monitoring (PE 100 %, GDM 46 %), body mass index calculation (PE 68 %, GDM 57 %), lipid profile evaluation (PE 71 %, GDM 57 %), glycated hemoglobin (PE 26 %, GDM 92 %), and fasting glucose (PE 28 %, GDM 91 %). CONCLUSION: GP-reported screening strategies to identify CVD in women with a history of PE and GDM were variable.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV) constituye la principal causa de mortalidad en mujeres; la preeclampsia (PE) y la diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) están asociadas a incremento en el riesgo de ECV. OBJETIVO: Evaluar el conocimiento de los médicos generales (MG) sobre complicaciones obstétricas asociadas a ECV. MÉTODOS: Se envió a los MG un cuestionario electrónico anónimo basado en casos, diseñado para evaluar el entendimiento de la influencia de la historia obstétrica en el riesgo cardiovascular a largo plazo y el conocimiento general sobre riesgo de ECV. RESULTADOS: La tasa de respuesta fue de 35 % (161/465). Los participantes reconocieron que la PE y la DMG son factores de riesgo para ECV (98 y 83 %, respectivamente) y reportaron las siguientes estrategias de tamizaje de ECV en mujeres con historial de PE y DMG: monitoreo de presión arterial (PE 100 %, DMG 46 %), cálculo de índice de masa corporal (PE 68 %, DMG 57 %), evaluación del perfil de lípidos (PE 71 %, DMG 57 %), hemoglobina glucosilada (PE 26 %, DMG 92 %) y glucosa en ayuno (PE 28 %, DMG 91 %). CONCLUSIÓN: Las estrategias de tamizaje para identificar ECV en mujeres con antecedentes de PE y DMG reportadas por los MG fueron variables.

Comparative analysis between prevention and treatment costs for gestational diabetes mellitus in primary and tertiary health care in a city in Southern Brazil / Análise comparativa entre os custos de prevenção e tratamento do diabetes mellitus gestacional na assistência à saúde primária e terciária em uma cidade do Sul do Brasil

Objective: The present study's purpose is to evaluate the economic context in which the Brazilian public health system, the only universal public health system with more than 200 million users, stands out. This evaluation will be made through the lens of the execution of gestational health care services in a city of approximately 500 thousand inhabitants in southern Brazil. The care costs of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) will be compared to those of patients without GDM, analyzing the different economic valuation methods. And lastly, there was an intent to explore the generated costs in the context of economic valuation applied to health to comprehend better the complexity of the union of the financial and health areas to optimize the services offered. Methods: For the economic context in health, an analysis of health investments was performed through the Transparency Portal. The costs involved in preventing GDM were raised by the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) table of procedures performed ordinarily in low-risk pregnancies. The expenses involved in DMG patients were increased at the High-Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Medicine Clinic of DMG patients. Results: Preventing GDM is more cost-effective, cost-minimizing, and cost-useful than treating patients diagnosed with GDM. Conclusion: The result is an extremely interesting costopportunity, given the economic context in which it is presented

Objetivo: O presente estudo tem como objetivo avaliar o contexto econômico em que se encontra o sistema público de saúde brasileiro, único sistema público universal de saúde com mais de 200 milhões de usuários. Essa avaliação será feita sob a ótica da execução de serviços de saúde gestacional em um município de aproximadamente 500 mil habitantes no Sul do Brasil. Os custos assistenciais de pacientes com diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) serão comparados aos de pacientes sem DMG, analisando os diferentes métodos de valoração econômica. Também serão analisados os custos gerados no contexto da valoração econômica aplicada à saúde para uma melhor com preensão da complexidade da união das áreas econômica e da saúde com o objetivo de otimizar os serviços oferecidos. Métodos: Para a contextualização econômica em saúde, foi feita a análise dos investimentos em saúde pelo Portal da Transparência. Os custos envolvidos na prevenção da DMG foram levantados pela tabela de procedimentos realizados ordinariamente em gestações de baixo risco do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Os custos envolvidos em pacientes com DMG foram levantados no Ambulatório de Gestação de Alto Risco e Medicina Fetal de pacientes com DMG. Resultados: Prevenir o DMG apresenta maiores custo-benefício, custo-efetividade, custo-minimização e custo-utilidade em comparação com o tratamento das pacientes com o diagnóstico de DMG. Conclusão: O resultado é um custo-oportunidade extremamente interessante, dado o contexto econômico em que se apresenta

Condição bucal de mulheres com diabetes mellitus gestacional internadas em um hospital escola no sul do Brasil / Oral condition of women with gestational diabetes mellitus admitted in a school hospital in southern Brazil

Objetivo: avaliar a condição bucal de mulheres com diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) internadas no Hospital Escola (HE) da Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel). Métodos: trata-se de um estudo transversal retrospectivo de base hospitalar, em que dois residentes treinados realizaram a coleta dos dados por meio da avaliação dos prontuários médicos e odontológicos, no período de setembro de 2019 a março de 2020. Os dados socioeconômicos e demográficos e o diagnóstico de DMG foram coletados dos prontuários médicos, enquanto hábitos e condição bucal, dos prontuários odontológicos. A análise dos dados foi realizada no programa Stata 11.0, usando os testes Exato de Fisher e Regressão de Poisson. Resultados: foram avaliados os prontuários de 83 gestantes, destas, 37 (44,6%) apresentavam DMG. A presença de DMG esteve asso-ciada com as gestantes de maior faixa etária (62,2%) e no terceiro trimestre de gestação. Em sua maioria, tinham renda de até dois salários mínimos, eram solteiras, tinham filhos e realizaram pré-natal. Em relação à avaliação bucal, apenas a presença de cálculo dental e inflamação gengival foi estatisticamente associada à presença de DMG (p= 0,030 e 0,014 respectivamente). A autopercepção do sorriso foi considerada ruim por 40,5%, e a maioria teve dentes perdidos por cárie (64,9%). Conclusões: a prevalência de DMG foi alta entre as gestantes internadas, sendo maior em mulheres de mais idade. Presença de cálculo dental e inflamação gengival foram fortemente associadas à presença de DMG, enquanto hábitos bucais e presença de cárie não apresentaram associação. Novas pesquisas, com exames periodontais completos, são necessárias para verifi-car as condições periodontais dessas mulheres.(AU)

Aim: to assess the oral condition of women with Gestacional Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) admitted in a School Hospital (HE)/UFPel. Methods: medical and dental records, from September 2019 to March 2020, were evaluated in this hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study. Socioeconomic and demographic data were collected from medical records, while oral condition and habits were obtained from the dental records. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata 11.0 software using Fisher's exact test and Poisson regression. Results: the medical records of 83 pregnant women were evaluated, of which 37 (44.6%) had GDM. The presence of GDM was associated with pregnant women of older age (62.2%) and most in the third trimester of pregnancy. Most of them had an income of up to two minimum wages, were single, had children and underwent prenatal care. Regarding the oral evaluation, only the presence of dental calculus and gingival inflammation was statistically associated with the presence of GDM (p = 0.030 and 0.014 respectively). The self-perception of the smile was considered bad to 40.5% and many of them had lost teeth due to caries (64.9%). Conclusions: the prevalence of GDM was high in hospitalized pregnant women, being higher in older women. Presence of dental calculus and gingival inflammation were strongly associated with the presence of GDM, while oral habits and the presence of caries were not associated. Further research, with complete periodontal examinations is necessary to verify the periodontal conditions of these women.(AU)