Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Sleep ; 46(12)2023 12 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37542730

ABSTRACT

Whole-night sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) is plagued by several types of large-amplitude artifacts. Common approaches to remove them are fraught with issues: channel interpolation, rejection of noisy intervals, and independent component analysis are time-consuming, rely on subjective user decisions, and result in signal loss. Artifact Subspace Reconstruction (ASR) is an increasingly popular approach to rapidly and automatically clean wake EEG data. Indeed, ASR adaptively removes large-amplitude artifacts regardless of their scalp topography or consistency throughout the recording. This makes ASR, at least in theory, a highly-promising tool to clean whole-night EEG. However, ASR crucially relies on calibration against a subset of relatively clean "baseline" data. This is problematic when the baseline changes substantially over time, as in whole-night EEG data. Here we tackled this issue and, for the first time, validated ASR for cleaning sleep EEG. We demonstrate that ASR applied out-of-the-box, with the parameters recommended for wake EEG, results in the dramatic removal of slow waves. We also provide an appropriate procedure to use ASR for automatic and rapid cleaning of whole-night sleep EEG data or any long EEG recording. Our procedure is freely available in Dusk2Dawn, an open-source plugin for EEGLAB.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Electroencephalography , Electroencephalography/methods , Scalp , Sleep , Algorithms
2.
Epileptic Disord ; 25(5): 591-648, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36938895

ABSTRACT

Overinterpretation of EEG is an important contributor to the misdiagnosis of epilepsy. For the EEG to have a high diagnostic value and high specificity, it is critical to recognize waveforms that can be mistaken for abnormal patterns. This article describes artifacts, normal rhythms, and normal patterns that are prone to being misinterpreted as abnormal. Artifacts are potentials generated outside the brain. They are divided into physiologic and extraphysiologic. Physiologic artifacts arise from the body and include EMG, eyes, various movements, EKG, pulse, and sweat. Some physiologic artifacts can be useful for interpretation such as EMG and eye movements. Extraphysiologic artifacts arise from outside the body, and in turn can be divided into the environments (electrodes, equipment, and cellphones) and devices within the body (pacemakers and neurostimulators). Normal rhythms can be divided into awake patterns (alpha rhythm and its variants, mu rhythm, lambda waves, posterior slow waves of youth, HV-induced slowing, photic driving, and photomyogenic response) and sleep patterns (POSTS, vertex waves, spindles, K complexes, sleep-related hypersynchrony, and frontal arousal rhythm). Breach can affect both awake and sleep rhythms. Normal variants or variants of uncertain clinical significance include variants that may have been considered abnormal in the early days of EEG but are now considered normal. These include wicket spikes and wicket rhythms (the most common normal pattern overread as epileptiform), small sharp spikes (aka benign epileptiform transients of sleep), rhythmic midtemporal theta of drowsiness (aka psychomotor variant), Cigánek rhythm (aka midline theta), 6 Hz phantom spike-wave, 14 and 6 Hz positive spikes, subclinical rhythmic epileptiform discharges of adults (SREDA), slow-fused transients, occipital spikes of blindness, and temporal slowing of the elderly. Correctly identifying artifacts and normal patterns can help avoid overinterpretation and misdiagnosis. This is an educational review paper addressing a learning objective of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) curriculum.

3.
J Neurosci Methods ; 371: 109501, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35182604

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Harvard Automatic Processing Pipeline for Electroencephalography (HAPPE) is a computerized EEG data processing pipeline designed for multiple site analysis of populations with neurodevelopmental disorders. This pipeline has been validated in-house by the developers but external testing using real-world datasets remains to be done. NEW METHOD: Resting and auditory event-related EEG data from 29 children ages 3-6 years with Fragile X Syndrome as well as simulated EEG data was used to evaluate HAPPE's noise reduction techniques, data standardization features, and data integration compared to traditional manualized processing. RESULTS: For the real EEG data, HAPPE pipeline showed greater trials retained, greater variance retained through independent component analysis (ICA) component removal, and smaller kurtosis than the manual pipeline; the manual pipeline had a significantly larger signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). For simulated EEG data, correlation between the pure signal and processed data was significantly higher for manually-processed data compared to HAPPE-processed data. Hierarchical linear modeling showed greater signal recovery in the manual pipeline with the exception of the gamma band signal which showed mixed results. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: SNR and simulated signal retention was significantly greater in the manually-processed data than the HAPPE-processed data. Signal reduction may negatively affect outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The HAPPE pipeline benefits from less active processing time and artifact reduction without removing segments. However, HAPPE may bias toward elimination of noise at the cost of signal. Recommended implementation of the HAPPE pipeline for neurodevelopmental populations depends on the goals and priorities of the research.


Subject(s)
Fragile X Syndrome , Algorithms , Artifacts , Child , Child, Preschool , Electroencephalography/methods , Humans , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Signal-To-Noise Ratio
4.
J Neural Eng ; 19(1)2022 02 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34902847

ABSTRACT

Objective.Neuroadaptive paradigms that systematically assess event-related potential (ERP) features across many different experimental parameters have the potential to improve the generalizability of ERP findings and may help to accelerate ERP-based biomarker discovery by identifying the exact experimental conditions for which ERPs differ most for a certain clinical population. Obtaining robust and reliable ERPs online is a prerequisite for ERP-based neuroadaptive research. One of the key steps involved is to correctly isolate electroencephalography artifacts in real time because they contribute a large amount of variance that, if not removed, will greatly distort the ERP obtained. Another key factor of concern is the computational cost of the online artifact handling method. This work aims to develop and validate a cost-efficient system to support ERP-based neuroadaptive research.Approach.We developed a simple online artifact handling method, single trial PCA-based artifact removal (SPA), based on variance distribution dichotomies to distinguish between artifacts and neural activity. We then applied this method in an ERP-based neuroadaptive paradigm in which Bayesian optimization was used to search individually optimal inter-stimulus-interval (ISI) that generates ERP with the highest signal-to-noise ratio.Main results.SPA was compared to other offline and online algorithms. The results showed that SPA exhibited good performance in both computational efficiency and preservation of ERP pattern. Based on SPA, the Bayesian optimization procedure was able to quickly find individually optimal ISI.Significance.The current work presents a simple yet highly cost-efficient method that has been validated in its ability to extract ERP, preserve ERP effects, and better support ERP-based neuroadaptive paradigm.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Algorithms , Bayes Theorem , Electroencephalography/methods , Evoked Potentials
5.
Front Neurosci ; 16: 997377, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36699519

ABSTRACT

The ear-EEG has emerged as a promising candidate for real-world wearable brain monitoring. While experimental studies have validated several applications of ear-EEG, the source-sensor relationship for neural sources from across the brain surface has not yet been established. In addition, modeling of the ear-EEG sensitivity to sources of artifacts is still missing. Through volume conductor modeling, the sensitivity of various configurations of ear-EEG is established for a range of neural sources, in addition to ocular artifact sources for the blink, vertical saccade, and horizontal saccade eye movements. Results conclusively support the introduction of ear-EEG into conventional EEG paradigms for monitoring neural activity that originates from within the temporal lobes, while also revealing the extent to which ear-EEG can be used for sources further away from these regions. The use of ear-EEG in scenarios prone to ocular artifacts is also supported, through the demonstration of proportional scaling of artifacts and neural signals in various configurations of ear-EEG. The results from this study can be used to support both existing and prospective experimental ear-EEG studies and applications in the context of sensitivity to both neural sources and ocular artifacts.

6.
Biomed Phys Eng Express ; 8(1)2021 12 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34852330

ABSTRACT

Steady-state Visually Evoked Potential (SSVEP) based Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal is utilized in brain-computer interface paradigms, diagnosis of brain diseases, and measurement of the cognitive status of the human brain. However, various artifacts such as the Electrocardiogram (ECG), Electrooculogram (EOG), and Electromyogram (EMG) are present in the raw EEG signal, which adversely affect the EEG-based appliances. In this research, Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Interface Systems (ANFIS) and Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT) are primarily employed to remove the artifacts from EEG signals. This work proposes Adaptive Noise Cancellation (ANC) and ANFIS based methods for canceling EEG artifacts. A mathematical model of EEG with the aforementioned artifacts is determined to accomplish the research goal, and then those artifacts are eliminated based on their mathematical characteristics. ANC, ANFIS, and HHT algorithms are simulated on the MATLAB platform, and their performances are also justified by various error estimation criteria using hardware implementation.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Brain-Computer Interfaces , Electroencephalography/methods , Humans , Machine Learning , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
7.
HCA Healthc J Med ; 2(3): 143-162, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37427002

ABSTRACT

Description Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interfaces (SMR-BCIs) are used for the acquisition and translation of motor imagery-related brain signals into machine control commands, bypassing the usual central nervous system output. The selection of optimal external variable configuration can maximize SMR-BCI performance in both healthy and disabled people. This performance is especially important now when the BCI is targeted for everyday use in the environment beyond strictly regulated laboratory settings. In this review article, we summarize and critically evaluate the current body of knowledge pertaining to the effect of the external variables on SMR-BCI performance. When assessing the relationship between SMR-BCI performance and external variables, we broadly characterize them as elements that are less dependent on the BCI user and originate from beyond the user. These elements include such factors as BCI type, distractors, training, visual and auditory feedback, virtual reality and magneto electric feedback, proprioceptive and haptic feedback, carefulness of electroencephalography (EEG) system assembling and positioning of EEG electrodes as well as recording-related artifacts. At the end of this review paper, future developments are proposed regarding the research into the effects of external variables on SMR-BCI performance. We believe that our critical review will be of value for academic BCI scientists and developers and clinical professionals working in the field of BCIs as well as for SMR-BCI users.

8.
Psychophysiology ; 57(8): e13566, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32185818

ABSTRACT

A major challenge for electroencephalograph (EEG) studies on pediatric populations is that large amounts of data are lost due to artifacts (e.g., movement and blinks). Independent component analysis (ICA) can separate artifactual and neural activity, allowing researchers to remove such artifactual activity and retain a greater percentage of EEG data for analyses. However, manual identification of artifactual components is time-consuming and requires subjective judgment. Automated algorithms, like ADJUST and ICLabel, have been validated on adults, but to our knowledge, no such algorithms have been optimized for pediatric data. Therefore, in an attempt to automate artifact selection for pediatric data collected with geodesic nets, we modified ADJUST's algorithm. Our "adjusted-ADJUST" algorithm was compared to the "original-ADJUST" algorithm and ICLabel in adults, children, and infants on three different performance measures: respective classification agreement with expert coders, the number of trials retained following artifact removal, and the reliability of the EEG signal after preprocessing with each algorithm. Overall, the adjusted-ADJUST algorithm performed better than the original-ADJUST algorithm and no ICA correction with adult and pediatric data. Moreover, in some measures, it performed better than ICLabel for pediatric data. These results indicate that optimizing existing algorithms improves artifact classification and retains more trials, potentially facilitating EEG studies with pediatric populations. Adjusted-ADJUST is freely available under the terms of the GNU General Public License at: https://github.com/ChildDevLab/MADE-EEG-preprocessing-pipeline/tree/master/adjusted_adjust_scripts.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Artifacts , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Electroencephalography/methods , Models, Theoretical , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Electroencephalography/standards , Humans , Motor Activity/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology
9.
Clin Neurophysiol Pract ; 5: 12-15, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31890993

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Children pose challenges to obtain quality EEG data due to excessive artifact. Collodion is used in EEG electrodes due to its water resistance and strong adhesive qualities. This study was done to evaluate differences in artifacts between the collodion and paste method. METHODS: 115 subjects (children age >3 years) were randomized into paste and collodion groups and artifacts evaluated at baseline and every hour over 30 s increments. Age, sleep state, and number of electrodes with artifact were also documented. T-test was performed to determine differences in the various parameters between the two groups. RESULTS: 61 subjects were in the paste group and 54 in the collodion group. Mean of total seconds of artifact from 0 to 24 h were 41.8 s in paste group versus 30.3 s in collodion group (P = 0.02). Children >11 years old had less artifact than younger children from 0 to 24 h (24.3 versus 41.2 s, P = 0.03), and from 24 to 48 h (33.1 versus 43.1 s, P = 0.03). There was a significant effect of sleep vs. awake state recordings on artifact from 0 to 24 h (30.3 versus 50.2 s, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Electrode problems are common with both collodion and paste in prolonged AEEG monitoring. However, for studies less than 24 h, collodion may be a better alternative. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study provides evidence that in some cases collodion may be a better alternative to paste in terms of decreased artifacts.

10.
Rev. mex. ing. bioméd ; 38(2): 420-436, may.-ago. 2017. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-902362

ABSTRACT

Resumen: El Potencial de disparidad es una respuesta cortical elicitada por la detección automática de estímulos con distintas características, permitiendo la exploración de procesos neuropsicológico. Sin embargo el análisis de esta señal se puede dificultar por una baja relación señal a ruido debida a los artefactos presentes en la adquisición de la misma. Diversas publicaciones proponen el uso de implementaciones de la técnica de Separación Ciega de fuentes, como el Análisis por Componentes Independientes (ACI), para preprocesar las señales y eliminar estos artefactos. Sin em bargo, no se ha estudiado cuál de los algoritmos ACI que se encuentran en la literatura será el óptimo para mejorar la calidad del MMN, por lo que en este estudio se propuso determinar si existen diferencias significativas en las respuestas obtenidas al utilizar los algoritmos de FastICA, Infomax y SOBI para eliminar los artefactos típicamente presentes en este tipo de señales. Adicionalmente se dan algunas características de estos artefactos a manera de sistematizar la identificación y eliminaciones de los mismos, además de comparar las respuestas obtenidas con y sin preprocesamiento, así como la distribución topográfica de este potencial antes y después de la eliminación de artefactos. Mediante el algoritmo Infomax se identifican mejor los Componentes Independientes asociados con artefactos, resultando en un MMN de mayor amplitud y distribución topográfica fronto-central con predominancia izquierda.


Abstract: Mismatch Negativity is a cortical response elicited by the automatic detection of stimuli which have different characteristics, allowing exploration of neuropsychological processes. However, the analysis of this signal can be di fficult by a low SNR due to artifacts present when the signal is recorded. Different publications propose to use the approach given by the Blind Source Separation Technique by means of the Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to preprocess and eliminate these artifacts. Nevertheless, it has not been studied which of the ICA algorithms found in the literature will be optimal for improving the quality of MMN. Therefore the aim of this study is to determine whether there are significant differences in the responses obtained by using FastICA, Infomax and SOBI to remove artifacts typically present in such signals. In addition, some features of the Independent Components related to artifacts are given in order to systematize the identification and elimination of those. In addition, MMN responses obtained with and without data preprocessing, as well as topographic maps before and after the elimination of artifacts were compared. Thus, Infomax is the best ICA algorithm to calculate Independent Components associated with artifacts, resulting in high amplitude MMN and a topographic map with a clear fronto-central distribution with left-hemisphere predominance.

11.
Comput Biol Med ; 87: 141-151, 2017 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28595129

ABSTRACT

This paper evaluates the performance of first generation entropy metrics, featured by the well known and widely used Approximate Entropy (ApEn) and Sample Entropy (SampEn) metrics, and what can be considered an evolution from these, Fuzzy Entropy (FuzzyEn), in the Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal classification context. The study uses the commonest artifacts found in real EEGs, such as white noise, and muscular, cardiac, and ocular artifacts. Using two different sets of publicly available EEG records, and a realistic range of amplitudes for interfering artifacts, this work optimises and assesses the robustness of these metrics against artifacts in class segmentation terms probability. The results show that the qualitative behaviour of the two datasets is similar, with SampEn and FuzzyEn performing the best, and the noise and muscular artifacts are the most confounding factors. On the contrary, there is a wide variability as regards initialization parameters. The poor performance achieved by ApEn suggests that this metric should not be used in these contexts.


Subject(s)
Electroencephalography/methods , Entropy , Artifacts , Fuzzy Logic , Humans , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
12.
Front Aging Neurosci ; 6: 55, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24723886

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, electroencephalography (EEG) has emerged as a reliable tool for the diagnosis of cortical disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). EEG signals, however, are susceptible to several artifacts, such as ocular, muscular, movement, and environmental. To overcome this limitation, existing diagnostic systems commonly depend on experienced clinicians to manually select artifact-free epochs from the collected multi-channel EEG data. Manual selection, however, is a tedious and time-consuming process, rendering the diagnostic system "semi-automated." Notwithstanding, a number of EEG artifact removal algorithms have been proposed in the literature. The (dis)advantages of using such algorithms in automated AD diagnostic systems, however, have not been documented; this paper aims to fill this gap. Here, we investigate the effects of three state-of-the-art automated artifact removal (AAR) algorithms (both alone and in combination with each other) on AD diagnostic systems based on four different classes of EEG features, namely, spectral, amplitude modulation rate of change, coherence, and phase. The three AAR algorithms tested are statistical artifact rejection (SAR), blind source separation based on second order blind identification and canonical correlation analysis (BSS-SOBI-CCA), and wavelet enhanced independent component analysis (wICA). Experimental results based on 20-channel resting-awake EEG data collected from 59 participants (20 patients with mild AD, 15 with moderate-to-severe AD, and 24 age-matched healthy controls) showed the wICA algorithm alone outperforming other enhancement algorithm combinations across three tasks: diagnosis (control vs. mild vs. moderate), early detection (control vs. mild), and disease progression (mild vs. moderate), thus opening the doors for fully-automated systems that can assist clinicians with early detection of AD, as well as disease severity progression assessment.

13.
Comput Biol Med ; 43(11): 1804-14, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24209926

ABSTRACT

Detection of non-cerebral activities or artifacts, intermixed within the background EEG, is essential to discard them from subsequent pattern analysis. The problem is much harder in neonatal EEG, where the background EEG contains spikes, waves, and rapid fluctuations in amplitude and frequency. Existing artifact detection methods are mostly limited to detect only a subset of artifacts such as ocular, muscle or power line artifacts. Few methods integrate different modules, each for detection of one specific category of artifact. Furthermore, most of the reference approaches are implemented and tested on adult EEG recordings. Direct application of those methods on neonatal EEG causes performance deterioration, due to greater pattern variation and inherent complexity. A method for detection of a wide range of artifact categories in neonatal EEG is thus required. At the same time, the method should be specific enough to preserve the background EEG information. The current study describes a feature based classification approach to detect both repetitive (generated from ECG, EMG, pulse, respiration, etc.) and transient (generated from eye blinking, eye movement, patient movement, etc.) artifacts. It focuses on artifact detection within high energy burst patterns, instead of detecting artifacts within the complete background EEG with wide pattern variation. The objective is to find true burst patterns, which can later be used to identify the Burst-Suppression (BS) pattern, which is commonly observed during newborn seizure. Such selective artifact detection is proven to be more sensitive to artifacts and specific to bursts, compared to the existing artifact detection approaches applied on the complete background EEG. Several time domain, frequency domain, statistical features, and features generated by wavelet decomposition are analyzed to model the proposed bi-classification between burst and artifact segments. A feature selection method is also applied to select the feature subset producing highest classification accuracy. The suggested feature based classification method is executed using our recorded neonatal EEG dataset, consisting of burst and artifact segments. We obtain 78% sensitivity and 72% specificity as the accuracy measures. The accuracy obtained using the proposed method is found to be about 20% higher than that of the reference approaches. Joint use of the proposed method with our previous work on burst detection outperforms reference methods on simultaneous burst and artifact detection. As the proposed method supports detection of a wide range of artifact patterns, it can be improved to incorporate the detection of artifacts within other seizure patterns and background EEG information as well.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Electroencephalography/methods , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Blinking/physiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Support Vector Machine
14.
Psychophysiology ; 48(2): 229-40, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20636297

ABSTRACT

A successful method for removing artifacts from electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings is Independent Component Analysis (ICA), but its implementation remains largely user-dependent. Here, we propose a completely automatic algorithm (ADJUST) that identifies artifacted independent components by combining stereotyped artifact-specific spatial and temporal features. Features were optimized to capture blinks, eye movements, and generic discontinuities on a feature selection dataset. Validation on a totally different EEG dataset shows that (1) ADJUST's classification of independent components largely matches a manual one by experts (agreement on 95.2% of the data variance), and (2) Removal of the artifacted components detected by ADJUST leads to neat reconstruction of visual and auditory event-related potentials from heavily artifacted data. These results demonstrate that ADJUST provides a fast, efficient, and automatic way to use ICA for artifact removal.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Artifacts , Auditory Perception/physiology , Electroencephalography/methods , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Adult , Humans
15.
Article in Korean | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-69043

ABSTRACT

Although neuroimaging techniques and other diagnostic procedures has been developed, electroencephalography(EEG) is still very important for the evaluation of various brain diseases and functional studies of human brain. EEG is formed mainly by spatial and temporal summations of postsynaptic potentials generated from a large population of pyramidal cells that can be considered as a collection of oscillating dipoles. EEG shows continuous rhythmic oscillation depending on sleep-waking state. Alpha rhythms are generated in cortical areas acting as epicenters with local spread, although the precise cellular mechanism is still unknown. It's been known that neurons in the nucleus reticular thalami are the pacemakers of sleep spindle. Alterations in the circuit of the reticular nuclei-thalamocortical relay neuron-cortical neuron are responsible for generalized spike and wave complexes. At the intracellular level, large paroxysmal depolarizing shifts produce focal epileptic spikes. Slow waves of EEG appear to be related to thalamocortical and/or corticothalamic deafferentation. The interpretation of routine EEG requires a well training from a qualified EEG teacher and reading adequate amount of EEG under supervision. Frequent misinterpretations of routine EEG have been observed in both local clinics and general hospitals. The most common findings of normal routine EEG misinterpreted as abnormal are normal variants and artifacts of various sources. There are considerable variations of normal EEG rhythms and pseudoepileptiform discharges. Eyeball movements produce prominent or subtle EEG changes over the frontal regions that are sometimes hard to be differentiated from abnormal slow waves over that region. Systematic approach was described for a good interpretation of routine EEG.


Subject(s)
Humans , Alpha Rhythm , Artifacts , Brain , Brain Diseases , Electroencephalography , Electrophysiology , Hospitals, General , Neuroimaging , Neurons , Organization and Administration , Pyramidal Cells , Synaptic Potentials
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL