Mitigating the risk of inflammatory type primary graft dysfunction by applying an integrated approach to assess, modify and match risk factors in lung transplantation.

Long-term outcome following lung transplantation remains one of the poorest of all solid organ transplants with a 1- and 5-year survival of 85% and 59% respectively for adult lung transplant recipients and with 50% of patients developing chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in the first 5 years following transplant. Reducing the risk of inflammatory type primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is vital for improving both short-term survival following lung transplantation and long-term outcome due to the association of early inflammatory-mediated damage to the allograft and the risk of CLAD. PGD has a multifactorial aetiology and high-grade inflammatory-type PGD is the result of cumulative insults that may be incurred in one or more of the three variables of the transplantation continuum: the donor lungs, the recipient and intraoperative process. We set out a conceptual framework which uses a fully integrated approach to this transplant continuum to attempt to identify and, where possible, modify specific donor, recipient and intraoperative PGD risk with the goal of reducing inflammatory-type PGD risk for an individual recipient. We also consider the concept and risk-benefit of matching lung allografts and recipients on the basis of donor and recipient PGD-risk compatibility. The use of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and the extended preservation of lung allografts on EVLP will be explored as safe, non-injurious EVLP may enable extensive inflammatory testing of specific donor lungs and has the potential to provide a platform for targeted therapeutic interventions on lung allografts.

The impact of ex vivo lung perfusion location on lung transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) conducted outside of the transplant center has increased in recent years to mitigate its limitation by resources and expertise. We sought to evaluate EVLP performed at transplant centers and externally. METHODS: Lung transplant recipients were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. Recipients were then stratified into two groups based where they were perfused: Transplant Program (TP) or External Perfusion Centers (EPC). The groups were assessed with comparative statistics and long-term survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method. The groups were then 1:1 propensity and this process was repeated. RESULTS: EPC use was generally restricted to the Southern United States. Following matching, there were no significant differences in post-operative outcomes to include post-operative stroke, dialysis, airway dehiscence, ECMO use, ventilator use or incidence of primary graft dysfunction Grade 3. Adjusted 3-year survival was 68.9% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 60.9%-77.9%) for the TP group and 67.6% (95% CI: 61.0%-74.9%) for the EPC group (p = 0.69). In allografts with extended ischemia (14+ h), those in the TP group had significantly longer length of stay, prolonged ventilation and treated rejection in the 1st year, though no significant difference in mid-term survival (p = 0.66). CONCLUSION: EVLP performed at an EPC can be carried out with results and survival similar to allografts undergoing EVLP at a TP. EPCs will extend the valuable resource of EVLP to lung transplant programs without the resources to perform EVLP.

Orthostatic Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion (EVLP): A Proof of Concept.

The key goal in lung donation remains the improvement of graft preservation with the ultimate objective of increasing the number and quality of lung transplants (LTx). Therefore, in recent years the field of graft preservation focused on improving outcomes related to solid organ regeneration and restoration. In this contest Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion (EVLP) plays a crucial role with the purpose to increase the donor pool availability transforming marginal and/or declined donor lungs suitable for transplantation. Aim of this proof of concept is to test the safety, suitability and feasibility of a new tilting dome for EVLP designed considering the dorsal lung areas as the "Achilles' heel" of the EVLP due to a more fluid accumulation than in the supine standard position.

Metabolomic studies reveal an organ-protective hibernation state in donor lungs preserved at 10°C.

OBJECTIVE: Previous reports showed enhanced graft function in both healthy and injured porcine lungs after preservation at 10°C. The objective of the study is to elucidate the mechanism of lung protection by 10°C and identify potential therapeutic targets to improve organ preservation. METHODS: Metabolomics data was analyzed from healthy and injured porcine lungs that underwent extended hypothermic preservation on ice and at 10°C. Tissue sampled before and after preservation were subjected to untargeted metabolic profiling. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to test for the separability of the paired samples. Significantly changed metabolites between the two timepoints were identified and analyzed to determine the underlying metabolic pathways. The levels of respiratory activity of lung tissue at hypothermic temperatures were confirmed using high resolution respirometry. RESULTS: In both healthy and injured lungs (n=5 per intervention), PCA suggested minimal change in metabolites after ice preservation, but significant change of metabolites after 10°C preservation, which was associated with significantly improved lung function as assessed by ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and lung transplantation. For healthy lungs, lipid energy pathway was found primarily active at 10°C. For injured lungs, additional carbohydrate energy pathway and anti-ferroptosis pathways aiding organ repair were identified. These metabolic features are also key features involved in mammal hibernation. CONCLUSION: Untargeted metabolomics revealed a dynamic metabolic gradient for lungs stored at 10°C. Elucidating the underlying mechanisms behind this pathway regulation may lead to strategies that will allow organs "hibernate" for days, potentially making organ banking a reality.

Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion and Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Lung Transplantation: A Contemporary United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis.

Background: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has detrimental effects on recipients following lung transplantation. Here, we determined the contemporary trends of PGD in a national database, factors associated with the development of PGD grade 3 (PGD3) and ex vivo lung perfusion's (EVLP) effect on this harmful postoperative complication. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried from 2015 to 2023, and recipients were stratified into No-PGD, PGD1/2, or PGD3. The groups were analyzed with comparative statistics, and survival was determined with Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine factors associated with increased mortality. PGD3 recipients were then stratified based on EVLP use prior to transplantation, and a 3:1 propensity match was performed to determine outcomes following transplantation. Finally, logistic regression models based on select criteria were used to determine risk factors associated with the development of PGD3 and mortality within 1 year. Results: A total of 21.4% of patients were identified as having PGD3 following lung transplant. Those with PGD3 suffered significantly worse perioperative morbidity, mortality, and had worse long-term survival. PGD3 was also independently associated with increased mortality. Matched EVLP PGD3 recipients had significantly higher use of ECMO postoperatively; however, they did not suffer other significant morbidity or mortality as compared to PGD3 recipients without EVLP use. Importantly, EVLP use prior to transplantation was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of PGD3 development, while having no significant association with early mortality. Conclusions: EVLP is associated with decreased PGD3 development, and further optimization of this technology is necessary to expand the donor pool.

Ex vivo MFG-E8 treatment improves the function of lungs procured from cardiac death donors in preclinical porcine model.

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a promising technology that allows the re-evaluation of donor lungs and has the potential to improve marginal lung reconditioning. The present study focused on the effects of milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8 (MFG-E8) on the function of donation after circulatory death (DCD) lungs during EVLP and transplant reperfusion. Domestic swine were assigned to 4 groups. In the control group, the donor lungs lacking warm ischemia were preserved in Perfadex for 4 h. The swine in the other three groups underwent hypoxic arrest, followed by 1 h of warm ischemia. The DCD lungs were procured and randomly divided into three groups: cold static preservation (DCD-CSP) group, DCD-EVLP group, and DCD-MFG-E8 group. The left lung of all groups was transplanted and reperfused. During EVLP and reperfusion, lung functions and pathological evaluations were performed. Treatment with MFG-E8 resulted in significantly improved blood oxygenation. The mean pulmonary artery pressure, peak airway pressure, and expression of IL-1ß, IL-6, and IL-12 were significantly lower but IL-10 was higher in the DCD -MFG-E8 group. Furthermore, the lung injury severity score, pulmonary edema, and wet-to-dry weight ratio were also reduced in MFG-E8-treated lungs. However, the pulmonary vascular resistance and expression of TNF-α did not differ from the DCD -EVLP group but were significantly lower than in the DCD -CSP group. Adding MFG-E8 into the perfusate during EVLP obtains optimal graft function of lungs from DCD. This finding, if confirmed clinically, can be applied to recondition grafts and expanded use of DCD lungs.

Restoring discarded porcine lungs by ex vivo removal of neutrophil extracellular traps.

BACKGROUND: By causing inflammation and tissue damage, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) constitute an underlying mechanism of aspiration-induced lung injury, a major factor of the low utilization of donor lungs in lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: To determine whether NET removal during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) can restore lung function and morphology in aspiration-damaged lungs, gastric aspiration lung injury was induced in 12 pigs. After confirmation of acute respiratory distress syndrome, the lungs were explanted and assigned to NET removal connected to EVLP (treated) (n = 6) or EVLP only (nontreated) (n = 6). Hemodynamic measurements were taken, and blood and tissue samples were collected to assess lung function, morphology, levels of cell-free DNA, extracellular histones, and nucleosomes as markers of NETs, as well as cytokine levels. RESULTS: After EVLP and NET removal in porcine lungs, PaO2/FiO2 ratios increased significantly compared to those undergoing EVLP alone (p = 0.0411). Treated lungs had lower cell-free DNA (p = 0.0260) and lower levels of extracellular histones in EVLP perfusate (p= 0.0260) than nontreated lungs. According to histopathology, treated lungs showed less immune cell infiltration and less edema compared with nontreated lungs, which was reflected in decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokines in EVLP perfusate and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, removing NETs during EVLP improved lung function and morphology in aspiration-damaged donor lungs. The ability to remove NETs during EVLP could represent a new therapeutic approach for LTx and potentially expand the donor pool for transplantation.

Long-term outcomes of lung transplantation with ex vivo lung perfusion technique.

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has demonstrated encouraging short- and medium-term outcomes with limited data available on its long-term outcomes. This study assesses (1) EVLP long-term outcomes and (2) EVLP era-based sub-analysis in addition to secondary outcomes of recipients with EVLP-treated donor lungs compared with recipients of conventionally preserved donor lungs in unmatched and propensity score-matched cohorts. Double lung transplants performed between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2021 were included. A total of 57 recipients received EVLP-treated lungs compared to 202 unmatched and 57 matched recipients who were subjected to non-EVLP-treated lungs. The EVLP group had a significantly lower mean PaO2/FiO2 ratio and significantly higher mean BMI than the non-EVLP group in the unmatched and matched cohorts. The proportion of smoking history in the unmatched cohort was significantly higher in the EVLP group, while a similar smoking history was demonstrated in the matched cohorts. No difference was demonstrated in overall freedom from death and retransplantation between the groups in the unmatched and matched cohorts (unmatched: hazard ratio (HR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-2.07, P = 0.32; matched: HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.59-1.89). P = 0.89). In the unmatched cohort, overall freedom from chronic allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was significantly different between the groups (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.07-2.52, P = 0.02); however, the cumulative CLAD incidence was similar (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.1, P = 0.13). In the matched cohort, the overall freedom from CLAD (HR 1.69, 95% CI 0.97-2.95, P = 0.06) and cumulative CLAD incidence (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.37-2.215, P = 0.83) were similar between the groups. The EVLP era sub-analysis of the unmatched cohort in 2012-2014 had a significantly higher cumulative CLAD incidence in the EVLP group; however, this was not demonstrated in the matched cohort. All secondary outcomes were similar between the groups in the unmatched and matched cohorts. In conclusion, transplantation of marginal donor lungs after EVLP evaluation is non-detrimental compared to conventionally preserved donor lungs in terms of mortality, retransplantation, cumulative CLAD incidence, and secondary outcomes. Although the unmatched EVLP era of 2012-2014 had a significantly higher cumulative CLAD incidence, no such finding was demonstrated in the matched cohort of the same era.

Subnormothermic ex vivo lung perfusion possibly protects against ischemia-reperfusion injury via the mTORC-HIF-1α pathway.

Background: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a useful technique for evaluating and repairing donor lungs for transplantation. However, studies examining the effects of perfusate temperature on graft function are limited. Thus, this study aimed to examine these effects during EVLP on ischemic-reperfusion injury in the donor lung. Methods: Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups, as follows: no treatment (sham group, n=5), normothermic EVLP (37 °C, n=5), and subnormothermic EVLP (30 °C, n=5). Lung function analyses, including oxygen capacity (OC), compliance, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), were performed hourly during EVLP. Further, after 4 h of EVLP, histological evaluation of the right lobe was performed using the lung injury severity (LIS) scale. The expression levels of inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, and IL-18 were evaluated. Metabolomic analysis of left lung tissues was conducted using capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CE-TOFMS) after 4 h of EVLP in the EVLP groups and after 1 h of cold preservation in the sham group. Results: Compared with those in the normothermic group, in the subnormothermic group, functional parameters during EVLP and subsequent histologic results were significantly superior, expression levels of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, and IL-18 were significantly lower, and glycolytic activity was significantly decreased. Furthermore, expression levels of mammalian target of rapamycin complex (mTORC), hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) 1α, and nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-containing family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) and its effector caspase-1 were significantly lower in the subnormothermic group than in the normothermic group. Conclusions: EVLP with subnormothermic perfusion improves lung graft function by reducing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and glycolytic activity during EVLP. Additionally, EVLP can be a useful target for the improvement of graft function after transplantation.

The impact and relevance of techniques and fluids on lung injury in machine perfusion of lungs.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a common complication after lung transplantation. A plethora of contributing factors are known and assessment of donor lung function prior to organ retrieval is mandatory for determination of lung quality. Specialized centers increasingly perform ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to further assess lung functionality and improve and extend lung preservation with the aim to increase lung utilization. EVLP can be performed following different protocols. The impact of the individual EVLP parameters on PGD development, organ function and postoperative outcome remains to be fully investigated. The variables relate to the engineering and function of the respective perfusion devices, such as the type of pump used, functional, like ventilation modes or physiological (e.g. perfusion solutions). This review reflects on the individual technical and fluid components relevant to EVLP and their respective impact on inflammatory response and outcome. We discuss key components of EVLP protocols and options for further improvement of EVLP in regard to PGD. This review offers an overview of available options for centers establishing an EVLP program and for researchers looking for ways to adapt existing protocols.

Ex vivo lung perfusion in donation after circulatory death: A post hoc analysis of the Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion as an Assessment of Extended/Marginal Donors Lungs trial.

OBJECTIVE: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors offer the ability to expand the lung donor pool and ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) further contributes to this ability by allowing for additional evaluation and resuscitation of these extended criteria donors. We sought to determine the outcomes of recipients receiving organs from DCD EVLP donors in a multicenter setting. METHODS: This was an unplanned post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized trial that took place during 2011 to 2017 with 3 years of follow-up. Patients were placed into 3 groups based off procurement strategy: brain-dead donor (control), brain-dead donor evaluated by EVLP, and DCD donors evaluated by EVLP. The primary outcomes were severe primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours and survival. Secondary outcomes included select perioperative outcomes, and 1-year and 3-years allograft function and quality of life measures. RESULTS: The DCD EVLP group had significantly higher incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours (P = .03), longer days on mechanical ventilation (P < .001) and in-hospital length of stay (P = .045). Survival at 3 years was 76.5% (95% CI, 69.2%-84.7%) for the control group, 68.3% (95% CI, 58.9%-79.1%) for the brain-dead donor group, and 60.7% (95% CI, 45.1%-81.8%) for the DCD group (P = .36). At 3-year follow-up, presence observed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome or quality of life metrics did not differ among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although DCD EVLP allografts might not be appropriate to transplant in every candidate recipient, the expansion of their use might afford recipients stagnant on the waitlist a viable therapy.

National utilization, trends, and lung transplant outcomes of static versus portable ex vivo lung perfusion platforms.

BACKGROUND: This study compared utilization and outcomes of the 2 widely utilized ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) platforms in the United States: a static platform and a portable platform. METHODS: Adult (age 18 years or older) bilateral lung-only transplants utilizing EVLP between February 28, 2018, and December 31, 2022, in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. Predischarge acute rejection, intubation at 72 hours posttransplant, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours posttransplant, primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours posttransplant, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality were evaluated using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: Overall, 607 (6.3%) lung transplants during the study period used EVLP (51.2% static, 48.8% portable). Static EVLP was primarily utilized in the eastern United States, whereas portable EVLP was primarily utilized in the western United States. Static EVLP donors were more likely to be donation after circulatory death (33.4% vs 26.0%; P = .005), have a >20 pack-year smoking history (13.5% vs 6.5%; P = .005), and be extended criteria donors (92.3% vs 85.0%; P = .013), whereas portable EVLP donors were more likely to be older than age 55 years (14.2% vs 8.0%; P = .02). Transplants utilizing the static and portable platforms had similar risk of acute rejection, intubation at 72 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours, and posttransplant mortality at 30 days and 1 year (all P values > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The static and portable platforms had significant differences in donor characteristics and geographic distributions of utilization. Despite this, posttransplant survival was similar between the 2 EVLP platforms.

Enhancing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Immunity by Genetic Delivery of Enveloped Virus-like Particles Displaying SARS-CoV-2 Spikes.

New vaccine delivery technologies, such as mRNA, have played a critical role in the rapid and efficient control of SARS-CoV-2, helping to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Enveloped virus-like particles (eVLPs) are often more immunogenic than protein subunit immunogens and could be an effective vaccine platform. Here, we investigated whether the genetic delivery of eVLPs could achieve strong immune responses in mice as previously reported with the immunization of in vitro purified eVLPs. We utilized Newcastle disease virus-like particles (NDVLPs) to display SARS-CoV-2 prefusion-stabilized spikes from the WA-1 or Beta variant (S-2P or S-2Pᵦ, respectively) and evaluated neutralizing murine immune responses achieved by a single-gene-transcript DNA construct for the WA-1 or Beta variant (which we named S-2P-NDVLP-1T and S-2Pᵦ-NDVLP-1T, respectively), by multiple-gene-transcript DNA constructs for the Beta variant (S-2Pᵦ-NDVLP-3T), and by a protein subunit-DNA construct for the WA-1 or Beta variant (S-2P-TM or S-2Pᵦ-TM, respectively). The genetic delivery of S-2P-NDVLP-1T or S-2Pᵦ-NDVLP-1T yielded modest neutralizing responses after a single immunization and high neutralizing responses after a second immunization, comparable to previously reported results in mice immunized with in vitro purified S-2P-NDVLPs. Notably, genetic delivery of S-2Pᵦ-NDVLP-3T yielded significantly higher neutralizing responses in mice after a second immunization than S-2Pᵦ-NDVLP-1T or S-2Pᵦ-TM. Genetic delivery also elicited high spike-specific T-cell responses. Collectively, these results indicate that genetic delivery can provide an effective means to immunize eVLPs and that a multiple-gene transcript eVLP platform may be especially efficacious and inform the design of improved vaccines.

Ventilation during ex vivo lung perfusion, a review.

Evidence suggests that ventilation during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) with a 'one-size-fits-all' strategy has the potential to cause lung injury which may only become clinically relevant in marginal lung allografts. EVLP induced- or accelerated lung injury is a dynamic and cumulative process reflecting the interplay of a number of factors. Stress and strain in lung tissue caused by positive pressure ventilation may be exacerbated by the altered properties of lung tissue in an EVLP setting. Any pre-existing injury may alter the ability of lung allografts to accommodate set ventilation and perfusion techniques on EVLP leading to further injury. This review will examine the effects of ventilation on donor lungs in the setting of EVLP. A framework for developing a protective ventilation technique will be proposed.

Prioritizing direct heart procurement in organ donors after circulatory death does not jeopardize lung transplant outcomes.

Background: Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) has become a standard in liver, kidney, and lung transplantation (LTx). Based on recent innovations in ex vivo heart preservation, heart transplant centers have started to accept cDCD heart allografts. Because the heart has very limited tolerance to warm ischemia, changes to the cDCD organ procurement procedures are needed. These changes entail delayed ventilation and prolonged warm ischemia for the lungs. Whether this negatively impacts lung allograft function is unclear. Methods: A retrospective analysis of cDCD lungs transplanted between 2012 and February 2022 at the Medical University of Vienna was performed. The heart + lung group consisted of cases in which the heart was procured by a cardiac team for subsequent normothermic ex vivo perfusion. A control group (lung group) was formed by cases where only the lungs were explanted. In heart + lung group cases, the heart procurement team placed cannulas after circulatory death and a hands-off time, collected donor blood for ex vivo perfusion, and performed rapid organ perfusion with Custodiol solution, after which the heart was explanted. Up to this point, the lung procurement team did not interfere. No concurrent lung ventilation or pulmonary artery perfusion was performed. After the cardiac procurement team left the table, ventilation was initiated, and lung perfusion was performed directly through both stumps of the pulmonary arteries using 2 large-bore Foley catheters. This study analyzed procedural explant times, postoperative outcomes, primary graft dysfunction (PGD), duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and early survival after LTx. Results: A total of 56 cDCD lungs were transplanted during the study period. In 7 cases (12.5%), the heart was also procured (heart + lung group); in 49 cases (87.5%), only the lungs were explanted (lung group). Basic donor parameters were comparable in the 2 groups. The median times from circulatory arrest to lung perfusion (24 minutes vs 13.5 minutes; P = .002) and from skin incision to lung perfusion (14 minutes vs 5 minutes; P = .005) were significantly longer for the heart + lung procedures. However, this did not affect post-transplantation PGD grade at 0 hours (P = .851), 24 hours (P = .856), 48 hours (P = .929), and 72 hours (P = .874). At 72 hours after transplantation, none of the lungs in the heart + lung group but 1 lung (2.2%) in lung group was in PGD 3. The median duration of mechanical ventilation (50 hours vs 41 hours; P = .801), length of ICU stay (8 days vs 6 days; P = .951), and total length of hospital stay (27 days vs 25 days; P = .814) were also comparable in the 2 groups. In-hospital mortality occurred in only 1 patient of the lung group (2.2%). Conclusions: Although prioritized cDCD heart explantation is associated with delayed ventilation and significantly longer warm ischemic time to the lungs, post-LTx outcomes within the first year are unchanged. Prioritizing heart perfusion and explantation in the setting of cDCD procurement can be considered acceptable.

Devices for donor lung preservation.

INTRODUCTION: Lung transplantation is the gold standard for the treatment of end stage lung disease but is limited by donor availability. Recently, the donor pool has seen significant expansion with liberalization of donor criteria. However, extended criteria donors can require additional time to prepare for implantation, necessitating additional preservation time of donor lungs. AREAS COVERED: We present a review of current lung transplant storage strategies including new methodologies and technological advancements. The current standard, static cold storage, is a simple and cost-effective method of preserving grafts, but offers little flexibility with limited ability to mitigate ischemic-reperfusion injury, inflammation, and hypothermic tissue damage. Novel ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) devices, TransMedics OCS and XVIVO perfusion systems, extend preservation time by perfusing, and ventilating donor lungs while simultaneously allowing for evaluation of lung viability. Perfusate, preservation solutions, additives, temperature regulation, and assessment of organ damage are all critical components when evaluating the success and outcomes of these devices. EXPERT OPINION: EVLP devices are more costly and often require additional resources and personnel support compared to static cold storage, but may provide the opportunity to extend preservation time, perform functional assessment, mitigate ischemic injury, and optimize extended criteria donors.

Remote ex vivo lung perfusion at a centralized evaluation facility.

BACKGROUND: In the US, only 23% of lungs offered for transplantation are transplanted. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) allows for evaluation of additional donor lungs; its adoption has been limited by resources and expertise. Dedicated facilities with a centralized lung evaluation system (CLES) could expand access to EVLP. METHODS: In this unblinded, nonrandomized, traditional feasibility study, 7 US transplant centers referred lungs declined for standard transplantation to a dedicated EVLP facility, which utilized a CLES. EVLP was remotely monitored by the transplant teams. CLES lungs were matched with contemporaneous conventional static cold-preserved controls at each center. RESULTS: A total of 115 recipients were enrolled, and 66 received allografts from 63 donors after EVLP at the dedicated CLES facility. Forty-nine contemporaneous patients served as controls. Primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours (PGD3-72 hours) was higher in the CLES group with 16 (24%) vs 2 (4%) in the control (common RD 95% CI, 0.07-0.32; p = 0.0009). All recipients survived to 30 days and 1-year survival was similar for both groups (92% controls vs 89% CLES; common RD 95% CI, -0.14-0.08; p = 0.58). Total preservation time, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, and time to first extubation were longer in the CLES group. CONCLUSIONS: Remote ex vivo perfusion of lung allografts declined for conventional transplantation at a dedicated CLES facility is feasible and resulted in additional transplants. Recipients of allografts assessed with a CLES had a higher rate of PGD3-72 hours, but similar 30-day and 1-year outcomes compared to conventional lung recipients. (NCT02234128).

Novel approaches for long-term lung transplant survival.

Allograft failure remains a major barrier in the field of lung transplantation and results primarily from acute and chronic rejection. To date, standard-of-care immunosuppressive regimens have proven unsuccessful in achieving acceptable long-term graft and patient survival. Recent insights into the unique immunologic properties of lung allografts provide an opportunity to develop more effective immunosuppressive strategies. Here we describe advances in our understanding of the mechanisms driving lung allograft rejection and highlight recent progress in the development of novel, lung-specific strategies aimed at promoting long-term allograft survival, including tolerance.