Endoscopic Management of Boerhaave Syndrome: Are Outcomes Better Than Surgery? A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Boerhaave syndrome (BS) is a rare clinical diagnosis associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Diagnosis of this condition is usually delayed which can lead to a very poor outcome. The timing of presentation and time to management plays a very important role in the prognosis and selection of the management method. With the advances seen in therapeutic endoscopy, many authors have been exploring the possibility of shifting the focus of management from surgery to interventional endoscopy. We present a case report of a patient presenting with BS that was successfully managed endoscopically. We also reviewed the literature on how surgical management compares to endoscopic management and attempted to establish general recommendations from available literature on management of BS.

Esophageal perforation after anterior cervical spine surgery.

Objective: To report our updated experience in the management of esophageal perforation resulting from anterior cervical spine surgery, and to compare two wound management approaches. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients managed for esophageal perforations resulting from anterior cervical spine surgery (2007-2020). We examine outcomes based on 2 wound management approaches: closed (closed incision over a drain) versus open (left open to heal by secondary intention). We collected data on demographics, operative management, resolution (resumption of oral intake), time to resolution, number of procedures needed for resolution, microbiology, length of stay, and neck morbidity. Results: A total of 13 patients were included (10 men). Median age was 52 years (range, 24-74 years). All patients underwent surgical drainage, repair, or attempted repair of perforation, hardware removal, and establishment of enteral access. Wounds were managed closed versus open (6 closed, 7 open). There were 2 early postoperative deaths due to acute respiratory distress syndrome and aspiration (open group), and 1 patient was lost to follow-up (closed group). Among the remaining 10 patients: resolution rate was 80% versus 100%, resolution in 30 days was 20% versus 100%, median number of procedures needed for resolution was 3 versus 1, and median hospital stay was 23 versus 14 days, for the closed and open groups, respectively. Conclusions: Esophageal perforation following anterior cervical spine surgery should be managed in a multidisciplinary fashion with surgical neck drainage, primary repair when feasible, hardware removal, and establishment of enteral access. We advocate open neck wound management to decrease the time-to-resolution, number of procedures, and length of stay.

Hydropneumopericardium Due to a Traumatic Esophageal-Pericardial Fistula.

Esophago-pericardial fistula is a rare, life-threatening condition, usually arising as a complication of benign esophageal disorders or iatrogenic causes. Prompt diagnosis via multimodality imaging is crucial, with computed tomography being the most sensitive. Management varies based on severity, with a growing trend toward early endoscopic interventions, which result in improved outcomes.

Infectious Mediastinitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: This study aimed to characterize the demographics, microbiology, management and treatment outcomes of mediastinitis according to the origin of the infection. Methods: This retrospective observational study enrolled patients who had mediastinitis diagnosed according to the criteria defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and were treated in Strasbourg University Hospital, France, between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. Results: We investigated 151 cases, including 63 cases of poststernotomy mediastinitis (PSM), 60 cases of mediastinitis due to esophageal perforation (MEP) and 17 cases of descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM). The mean patient age (standard deviation) was 63 (14.5) years, and 109 of 151 patients were male. Microbiological documentation varied according to the origin of the infection. When documented, PSM cases were mostly monomicrobial (36 of 53 cases [67.9%]) and involved staphylococci (36 of 53 [67.9%]), whereas MEP and DNM cases were mostly plurimicrobial (38 of 48 [79.2%] and 8 of 12 [66.7%], respectively) and involved digestive or oral flora microorganisms, respectively. The median duration of anti-infective treatment was 41 days (interquartile range, 21-56 days), and 122 of 151 patients (80.8%) benefited from early surgical management. The overall 1-year survival rate was estimated to be 64.8% (95% confidence interval, 56.6%-74.3%), but varied from 80.1% for DNM to 61.5% for MEP. Conclusions: Mediastinitis represents a rare yet deadly infection. The present cohort study exhibited the different patterns observed according to the origin of the infection. Greater insight and knowledge on these differences may help guide the management of these complex infections, especially with respect to empirical anti-infective treatments.

Fishing Out a Bone From the Neck.

Foreign body ingestion is a common medical issue in Asian populations. Fish bones are the most commonly ingested foreign bodies due to the practice of cooking fish whole with bones intact, unlike in Western countries where fish are typically prepared as fillets or patties. Patients who have swallowed fish bones usually present with foreign body sensations, odynophagia, and pricking sensations during deglutination. Fish bones can generally be removed in an outpatient setting, but in some cases, patients must be placed under general anesthesia, where rigid esophagoscopy is performed. In some cases, neck exploration is required to extricate the bone. Here, we report the case of a 71-year-old man who underwent neck exploration for a 2.1 cm fish bone lateral to his thyroid cartilage, penetrating the left thyroid lobe.

Clinical Features of iatrogenic Pharyngo-esophageal perforation in very low birth weight infants.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic pharyngoesophageal perforation (IPEP) is one of the complications of gastric tube insertion and it tends to occur more frequently in premature infants. Although the frequency is significantly low, attention should be paid as it can lead to serious outcomes with high mortality. This study will help raise awareness with respect to early diagnosis, management, and prevention. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all very low birth weight infants diagnosed with IPEP between 1993 and 2022. RESULTS: A total of 6 patients (0.27% of very low birth weight infants) with the diagnosis of IPEP were included. The median gestational age was 27 + 1 weeks (range 23+5-28 + 6 weeks), and the median birth weight was 823 g (range 630-1232 g). Symptoms included difficulty with gastric tube insertion, bloody secretions in the oral cavity, and increased oral secretions. X-rays revealed aberrant running of the gastric tube in all patients. In three cases, contrast studies demonstrated contrasted mediastinum tapering like a bead. Laryngoscope was used to view the perforation sites but this was not useful in the smallest patient. All patients were treated conservatively with antibiotics and survived. CONCLUSIONS: When inserting a gastric tube for premature infants, it is critical to remember that these infants are at risk of IPEP. In addition to a frontal X-ray, a lateral X-ray and contrast study may be useful for early diagnosis.

Swallowed denture stuck in the proximal esophagus.

A 72-year-old male with dementia and Parkinson's disease presented at the otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic with acute dysphagia. A chest x­ray showed a dental prosthesis in the upper esophagus, which was subsequently extracted via rigid esophagoscopy. Due to suspected esophageal perforation on postoperative CT, a cervical approach to the esophagus and flexible esophagoscopy were used, but no evidence of perforation could be identified. This case highlights challenges in managing high-risk esophageal foreign bodies in the upper esophagus, emphasizing the need for careful assessment and a multidisciplinary approach.

A Case Report of Conservatively Managed Boerhaave Syndrome.

Boerhaave syndrome is an esophagal perforation due to a rupture of the esophagus wall caused by intense vomiting with mediastinitis and subcutaneous emphysema. It is a relatively rare and potentially life-threatening ailment that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. This case presents an overview of the syndrome, including morbidity, mortality, and treatment strategy. In this case, a 56-year-old male presented to the hospital during emergency hours with shortness of breath, chest pain, and dullness in the neck and a history of binge alcohol abuse seven days ago, followed by a severe bout of vomiting. The patient was managed conservatively, requiring another hospitalization for surgery, and was later discharged from the hospital postoperatively without any complications.

Bilateral Empyema With Beta Hemolytic Group C Streptococcus and Streptococcus constellatus Co-infection Resulting From an Esophageal Perforation and Associated With Septic Shock, Diffuse ST Elevation, and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation.

Empyema is the collection of pus in the pleural cavity and most times, it occurs unilaterally. It is often associated with underlying pneumonia, but other causes have been identified as well. When it occurs after an esophageal perforation, which in itself is also rare, morbidity and mortality are even higher. Esophageal perforation can cause life-threatening complications due to its close proximity to the vital organs of the mediastinum, necessitating its timely diagnosis and aggressive management. Bacteria forming part of the normal esophageal and oral flora are the most common causative pathogens for empyema from an esophageal perforation. Streptococcus constellatus and group C Streptococci, though both rare and often not taken seriously, have been identified as individual causes of empyema. We present a case of a 58-year-old male who presented with a worsening cough, chest pain, and shortness of breath after choking on a fish bone. He was diagnosed with bilateral loculated empyema resulting from esophageal perforation with the pleural fluid culture isolating both group C streptococcus and Streptococcus constellatus. He also developed respiratory failure, mediastinitis, and septic shock. This case will enable physicians to take empyema caused by these bacteria seriously and also to include esophageal perforation as a differential diagnosis when a patient presents with bilateral empyema associated with chest pain and electrocardiographic changes.

Esophageal Perforation Presenting Initially as Multiple Brain Abscesses Secondary to Streptococcus intermedius.

Brain abscess is a life-threatening infection that can occur secondary to contiguous or hematogenous spread. Several underlying conditions can lead to brain abscesses, such as dental infection, otitis media, sinusitis, and immunosuppression. Esophageal perforation leading to brain abscesses is extremely rare. We report a rare case of a 32-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with progressive headaches and upper-extremity weakness. Upon further evaluation, computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple brain abscesses secondary to Streptococcus intermedius infection. The patient eventually underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which showed a perforation in the middle third of the esophagus. This case highlights the importance of considering esophageal perforation as a predisposing condition for brain abscesses.

Endoscopic self-expandable metal stent versus endoscopy vacuum therapy for traumatic esophageal perforations: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic esophageal perforations (TEP) are a grave medical condition and require immediate intervention. Techniques such as Esophageal Self-Expandable Metal Stent (E-SEMS) and Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) show promise in reducing tissue damage and controlling esophageal leakage. The present study aims to compare the application of EVT to E-SEMS placement in TEP. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study valuated 30 patients with TEP. The E-SEMS and EVT groups were assessed for time of hospitalization, treatment duration, costs, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Patients treated with EVT (24.4 ± 13.2) demonstrated significantly shorter treatment duration (p < 0.005) compared to the group treated with E-SEMS (45.8 ± 12.9) and patients submitted to E-SEMS demonstrated a significant reduction (p = 0.02) in the time of hospitalization compared to the EVT (34 ± 2 vs 82 ± 5 days). Both groups demonstrated a satisfactory discharge rate (E-SEMS 93.7% vs EVT 71.4%) but did not show statistically significant difference (p = 0.3155). E-SEMS treatment had a lower mean cost than EVT (p < 0.05). Descriptive statistics were utilized, arranged in table form, where frequencies, percentages, mean, median, and standard deviation of the study variables were calculated and counted. The Fisher's Exact Test was used to evaluate the relationship between two categorical variables. To evaluate differences between means and central points, the parametric t-test was utilized. Comparisons with p value up to 0.05 were considered significant. CONCLUSION: E-SEMS showed a shorter time of hospitalization, but a longer duration of treatment compared to EVT. The placement of E-SEMS and EVT had the same clinical outcome. Treatment with E-SEMS had a lower cost compared with EVT.

Isolated Blowout Distal Esophageal Injury From Blunt Thoraco-Abdominal Trauma Following Airbag Deployment in an Unrestrained Driver: A Case Report.

Esophageal perforation from blunt trauma is rare. It is more frequently encountered in a penetrative mechanism where the cervical esophagus is most commonly injured. Blunt esophageal injury is challenging to diagnose with nonspecific findings clinically and radiologically within trauma settings. The main factors contributing to difficulty in early recognition are its scarce occurrence combined with nonspecific manifestations clinically on patient examination and radiologically on usual trauma computed tomography with intravenous contrast. We report a case of a 15-year-old young man who sustained an isolated distal blowout esophageal perforation as a result of blunt thoraco-abdominal trauma. Despite early primary surgical repair, a leak developed later on, which was managed with stent placement. The leak and associated sepsis were resolved, with an overall status improvement and no subsequent complications. We report an unusual presentation of esophageal perforation from blunt trauma, which was promptly diagnosed and managed with multiple modalities. This case highlights the importance of early recognition and management of esophageal injury and, furthermore, the role of multiple diagnostic and therapeutic modalities that lead to a successful outcome.

Pulling instead of pushing: A case report of gastrostomy-assisted pull technique as an alternative method for endoluminal sponge placement in EVAC therapy.

Endoscopic vacuum-assisted therapy offers an easier and safer alternative to thoracic surgery, self-expanding stents, or esophageal clips and has been shown to be a promising technique for management of pediatric esophageal perforations. In this report, we present a novel application of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-assisted pull technique, wherein a preexisting gastrostomy is reaccessed to allow safe placement of the vacuum sponge with a more comfortable and effective endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy compared to transnasal or transoral options. A 7-year-old male with a history of type C esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula complicated by leak and refractory esophageal stricture, severe tracheomalacia, and prior esophageal stricture resection presented for posterior tracheoplasty and tracheopexy complicated by esophageal perforation. A preexisting gastrostomy site was re-accessed to allow for a novel approach for endoluminal sponge placement in endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) therapy by gastrostomy-assisted pull technique. The patient had appropriate healing without further leak 1 month after repair. This case highlights the use of EVAC as a minimally invasive option for repair of esophageal perforation using a pull-through method at the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube site as gastric access. This method may improve control of placement and reduce sponge migration, reduce intraluminal distance of sponge placement, and reduce morbidity by avoiding thoracotomy.

Aetiology, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Oesophageal Perforation: A Review.

Oesophageal perforation (OP) is a life-threatening condition and refers to a tear or disruption in the oesophageal wall. It is considered a medical emergency due to its significant implications, often related to its various causes, such as iatrogenic perforation during endoscopy, Boerhaave syndrome, traumatic injury, foreign body ingestion, and tumour perforation. Early interventions, diagnosis, and a thorough physical examination are essential for better clinical outcomes. Diagnostic procedures and imaging techniques, play a crucial role in confirming OP. The diagnostic workup, based on the index of suspicion, may involve barium oesophagram or contrast-enhanced CT. Once diagnosed, classification of severity using the Pittsburgh clinical severity score guides treatment decisions. Management can be non-surgical or surgical and focuses on a multi-disciplinary approach combining conservative, surgical, or endoscopic methods. Surgical control remains crucial, with the approach dependent on the location of the leak. Improved knowledge of this life-threatening condition is important among healthcare professionals. The objective of this review is to provide information about oesophageal perforation and its early detection, management, and multidisciplinary interventions for optimal patient outcomes.

Case Report: Unique management strategy for rare case of esophageal foreign body.

Background: Foreign bodies that enter the esophagus can cause serious complications that may require extensive surgical intervention, including open surgery. The treatment method depends on the location, size, configuration, and number of foreign bodies in the esophagus, but to date, the best method to remove foreign bodies from the esophagus remains uncertain. Foreign bodies which can damage the walls of esophagus varies from bones and bone fragments, to metallic objects and batteries. In this article, we present a rare case of a "fish bone" penetrating through the esophagus walls and directly punctured the aorta, forming a post-traumatic saccular pseudoaneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta, which was successfully treated with endovascular stent placement to the aorta and with endoscopic foreign body removal. Case summary: We reported a case of a 16-year-old male with a 6-day history of chest pain after consuming fish. As result of immediate test in regional hospital using oral flexible esophagogastroduodenoscopy abnormalities were not reported. Due to persistence of beforementioned symptoms, a fiberoptic esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed 3 days later, revealing a 1.5-2.0 cm long altered area with contact bleeding 33.0 cm from the incisors, but no visualization of any foreign body. Computed tomography revealed a fish bone that had completely passed through walls of the esophagus and punctured the aortic wall, forming an aneurysm. Patient was urgently hospitalized by air ambulance to our hospital for high-specialized medical intervention after 6 days. After the endovascular placement of a stent graft, the fish bone was successfully removed by endoscopic intervention. 12 months follow up showed no abnormalities. Conclusion: Endoscopic removal of foreign bodies in the esophagus and extracting a foreign body after thoracic endovascular aortic stent may be a feasible option for some cases.

Efficacy of esophageal stents as a primary therapeutic option in spontaneous esophageal perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Background: Spontaneous esophageal perforation traditionally mandates urgent surgical treatment. Lately, esophageal stents have been used to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. The current systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of stents as a primary treatment option in this scenario. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for studies published in the English language between 2000 and 2023. We included observational studies reporting on the use of stents, alongside conservative measures and drainage procedures, in patients with spontaneous esophageal perforations. Primary outcomes were sealing rate (persistent leak occlusion) and failure rate (mortality or conversion to a major surgical operation). Secondary outcomes included patients' presentation, sepsis, drainage procedures, and reinterventions. Results for primary outcomes were presented as pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using a random-effects model. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS score. Results: Eighteen studies involving 171 patients were included. Sealing rate was 86% (95%CI 77-93%) and failure rate was 14% (95%CI 7-22%). Weighted mortality rate was 6% (95%CI 2-13%), while conversion to surgical treatment was 2% (95%CI 0-9%). Late presentation was not related to a statistically significant increase in treatment failure (odds ratio 1.85, 95%CI 0.37-9.30; P=0.72). Drainage procedures were required for the majority of patients, with a high rate of surgical and endoscopic reinterventions. Conclusions: Our results imply that stents may offer an effective and safe alternative treatment for patients with spontaneous esophageal perforations. Additional endoscopic and surgical drainage procedures are frequently needed.

Esophageal Perforation by Fish Bone Ingestion Causing Purulent Pericarditis.

A previously healthy 38-year-old woman presented with new-onset sudden chest pain radiating to the back, associated with cough, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, and gastric fullness after eating a bony fish. A diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease was made. After a week of progressive worsening of her symptoms, she was referred to the specialist hospital. There, computed tomography imaging strongly suggested that a likely fishbone had penetrated the esophagus into the mediastinal structures; it seemed to have produced a pneumopericardium. Other tests suggested diffuse changes in ventricular repolarization, pericardial thickening, and diastolic restriction. Exploratory thoracotomy confirmed esophageal-pericardial perforation by the fishbone and purulent pericarditis. Despite appropriate surgical repair, the patient died on fifth postoperative day from an asystolic cardiac arrest that was refractory to repeated attempts to resuscitate her.

Delayed postoperative erosion of hypopharynx after anterior hardware extrusion: A case report.

Background: Esophageal breach or pharynx perforations are serious and potentially fatal complications of anterior cervical corpectomy/fusion (ACF). They are either recognized intraoperatively or are diagnosed within several postoperative days. Here, a 76-year-old male presented with the retropharyngeal extrusion of an anterior cervical expandable cage that occurred two years postoperatively. Case Description: A 76-year-old male with a history of an anterior corpectomy/fusion (C3-C6, corpectomy C4, C5) performed two years ago presented with persistent dysphagia for three months. Cervical X-rays showed anterior migration of the expandable cage and that was also confirmed by computed tomography (CT) scans. During intubation, the anesthesiologist observed that the cage had directly penetrated the hypopharynx. Following routine removal of the cage, ENT could not identify (using the operating microscope) any direct perforation of the esophagus or hypopharynx; presumably, the esophageal breach was small, and the esophageal wall spontaneously closed the gap following cage excision. Conclusion: Pharyngeal perforation after ACF is typically associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Stringent preoperative assessment, utilizing X-rays, magnetic resonance/CT studies, and ENT specialists to perform indirect laryngoscopy, may optimize postoperative outcomes.

Rigid Esophagoscopy for Foreign Body Extraction: Results and Complications in the Endoscopic Era.

Introduction Rigid esophagoscopy (RE) has long been a part of otolaryngology practice. In the past decades, the procedure was less commonly performed due to the advances and availability of flexible endoscopic techniques. This study aims to describe the outcomes of RE performed to treat foreign body ingestion and to evaluate risk factors associated with postoperative complications. Methods Patients who underwent RE to treat foreign body ingestion in an otolaryngology emergency department of a Portuguese tertiary university hospital, between 2010 and 2020, were included. A total of 162 cases were analyzed, and data was collected retrospectively. Results The most common foreign bodies were meat bone (31.5%, n = 47), food impaction (28.8%, n = 43), and fish bone (19.5%, n = 29). The proximal esophagus was by far the most frequent location (80%, n = 118). Esophageal perforation occurred in 8% (13 patients), and there was a 2.5% (n = 4) mortality rate. The odds ratio of an esophageal perforation if the foreign body was completely or partially located outside the proximal esophagus was 4.67 times that of a foreign body exclusively in the proximal esophagus (OR = 4.67 [95% CI: 1.39-15.72]; p = 0.016; Fisher's exact test). Conclusion RE remains an effective and important technique in the management of ingested foreign bodies, particularly if endoscopic removal is unsuccessful. Foreign body location outside the proximal esophagus was associated with esophageal perforation.