A Simulated Patient Protocol for Implementing Evidence-Based Practices in Health Care Delivery.

Background: Substantial work has been done to update or create evidence-based practices (EBPs) in the changing health care landscape. However, the success of these EBPs is limited by low levels of clinician implementation. The goal of this study is to describe the use of simulated patient (SP) methodology as a framework to develop implementation bundles to increase the effectiveness, sustainability, and reproducibility of EBPs across health care clinicians. The primary outcome was identifying likely facilitators for the successful implementation of EBP. Our secondary outcome was the assess the feasibility of using SPs to illuminate likely implementation barriers and facilitators. Methods: We observed 12 primary care clinicians' first-time experiences with six unique decision-making algorithms for use with patients exhibiting concerning behaviors associated with long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic pain over Zoom. Each clinician was paired with two simulated patients trained to portray individuals with one of the concerning behaviors addressed by the algorithms. The Standardized Patient-evaluations were followed by CFIR guided one-on-one interviews with the clinicians. Results: The SP portrayal illuminated factors that were pertinent to address in the implementation bundle. SPs were realistic in their portrayal of patients with concerning behaviors associated with LTOT for chronic pain, but clinicians also noted that their patients in practice may have been more aggressive about their treatment plan. Conclusions: SP simulation provides unique opportunities for obtaining crucial feedback to identify best practices in the adoption of new EBPs for high-risk patients.

Supporting Emotionally Exhausted Community Mental Health Therapists in Appropriately Adapting EBPs for Children and Adolescents.

Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are often adapted during community implementation to improve EBP fit for clients and the service context. Augmenting EBPs with additional dosing and content may improve fit. However, reducing EBP content can reduce EBP effectiveness. Using multilevel regression models, this study examined whether supportive program climate and program-furnished EBP-specific implementation strategies (e.g., materials, ongoing training, in-house experts) are associated with augmenting and reducing adaptations, and whether therapist emotional exhaustion moderated these associations. Data were collected from surveys completed by 439 therapists from 102 programs 9 years after a system-driven EBP implementation initiative. Supportive program climate was associated with more augmenting adaptations. Emotional exhaustion was a significant moderator. When organizations used more EBP-specific implementation strategies, more emotionally exhausted therapists reduced EBPs less and less emotionally exhausted therapists augmented EBPs more. Findings provide guidance on how organizations can support appropriate EBP adaptations in spite of therapist emotional exhaustion.

Needs and Attitudes Related to the Adoption of Evidence-Based Practices Among Latinx Mental Health Professionals.

Empirically supported interventions are warranted to achieve desired clinical outcomes and improve service delivery. Thus, efforts to identify, adopt, and implement Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs) are underway across various Latinx communities, including Puerto Ricans, where there is a growing recognition and prevalence of mental health and substance use disorders. This study investigated the needs and attitudes toward EBPs among an interdisciplinary sample of mental health professionals in Puerto Rico. An anonymous survey was distributed to social workers, psychologists, and professional counselors (N = 237). Using structural equation modeling, four dimensions of attitudes towards EBPs (openness, divergence, appeal, and requirement) were regressed on various individual and organizational factors. Some socio-demographic characteristics, educational opportunities, and organizational factors significantly contributed to specific attitudes related to the adoption of EBPs. Female participants and those working in rural settings scored higher in the openness to innovation dimension. Greater organizational support and graduating from a private institution were associated with more divergence from research, while married individuals and those trained on EBPs scored lower on this dimension. The lack of exposure to EBPs in college and younger age predicted greater interest in the appeal of adopting an EBP intervention (i.e., would adopt an EBP if it made sense). No differences in attitudes toward EBPs were found by professional discipline or work setting (i.e., clinical, community, and schools). Recommendations to increase openness and interest in the appeal of EBPs among Spanish-speaking professional communities in Latin America are highlighted.