Effect evaluation of peroneal osteotomy combined with arthroscopic knee debridement in patients with knee osteoarthritis / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective:To evaluate the effects of peroneal osteotomy combined with arthroscopic knee debridement on perioperative indexes, X-ray indexes, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Assessment score (JOA score), American Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (HSS score) and complication rate of patients with knee osteoarthritis.Methods:A prospective research method was adopted. A total of 110 patients with knee osteoarthritis who were admitted to Chengde Central Hospital from April 2016 to April 2021 were selected as the research objects and divided into the control group (55 cases), the combined group (55 cases) by random number table method. The control group underwent arthroscopic debridement of the knee joint. On the basis of the control group, the combined group was combined with fibula osteotomy. The control group and the combined group were followed up for 6 months after operation. The perioperative indicators, score of JOA before and after 1 month of treatment, X-ray indicators, score of HSS before and after 6 months of treatment, and the incidence of complications during the follow-up period were compared between the control group and the combined group.Results:The operation time of the combined group was longer than that of the control group: (84.36 ± 14.64) min vs. (75.88 ± 12.86) min; compared with before operation, 1 month after operation, the scores of swelling, pain while up and down stairs, walking pain, joint range of motion were increased in the control group and the combined group, and the combined group was higher than the control group: (8.35 ± 0.73) points vs. (6.74 ± 0.67) points, (15.05 ± 1.74) points vs. (13.96±1.66) points, (21.75 ± 2.07) points vs. (18.58 ± 1.73) points, (27.59 ± 3.25) points vs. (25.74 ± 2.83) points; the femoral tibial angle and the range of motion of the knee joint in the control group and the combined group were increased, and the combined group was greater than the control group: (1.94 ± 0.60)° vs. (3.02 ± 0.67)°; the scores of stability, flexion deformity, muscle strength, range of motion, function, and pain in the control group and the combined group increased, and the combined group was higher than the control group: (8.62 ± 0.86) points vs. (6.89 ± 0.78) points, (7.86 ± 0.96) points vs. (6.27 ± 0.68) points, (7.79 ± 0.62) points vs. (6.95 ± 0.57) points, (14.95 ± 2.60) points vs. (12.48 ± 2.33) points, (17.46 ± 2.21) points vs. (14.59 ± 1.76) points, (24.83 ± 3.25) points vs. (18.59 ± 2.57) points, the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). During the following up period, there were no significant differences in the incidences of osteofascial compartment syndrome, neurovascular injury, intraarticular adhesion and incision infection between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The operation time of fibular osteotomy combined with arthroscopic debridement of knee joint in patients with knee osteoarthritis was longer, but fibular osteotomy combined with arthroscopic debridement of the knee joint can reduce the valgus of the patient and improve the range of motion of the joint. It could effectively reduce the degree of pain and improve the function of knee joint, and the safety was good, with good therapeutic effect.

Clinical efficacy and feasibility of laser correction technology with an ordinary laser pen and surgical instrument box in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for medial knee osteoarthritis primarily depend on the corrective precision. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy and feasibility of laser correction technology with an ordinary laser pen and surgical instrument box. METHODS: This prospective and randomized trial included 71 patients randomly divided into laser (n = 36) and traditional groups (n = 35). In the laser group, the hip centre, knee (Fujisawa point), and ankle centre were located preoperatively using the surgical instrument box lid. The leg was aligned with an ordinary laser pen. In the traditional group, the lower limb alignment was corrected by a metal cable. Radiation exposure, operative time, and rate of outliers (lower limb force line does not pass through 62-66% of the lateral tibial plateau) were evaluated. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded. After 24 months, the femoral tibial angle (FTA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and posterior slope angle (PSA), were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the survival time of affected knees, and postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: The radiation exposure, operative time and rate of outliers were lower in the laser correction group (P < 0.05). Six months postoperatively, the VAS and WOMAC scores were significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.001). At 24 months, the FTA, MPTA, and PSA were corrected in both groups (P < 0.001). There were no differences in the postoperative knee survival time from OWHTO to knee arthroplasty between the groups or postoperative complications (P = 0.53; P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Laser correction technology can effectively reduce radiation exposure, the operative time, and the rate of outliers (trial identification number (retrospectively registered): ChiCTR2200060480; date of register: 03/06/2022).

Medial joint space width and convergence angle change with time after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Although the medial joint space width (MJSW) is commonly used for radiographic evaluation of knee osteoarthritis, the changes in knee joint space width (JSW) during weight bearing after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) remain unclear. This study aimed to depict how medial and lateral JSWs and convergence angles change gradually after MOWHTO. METHODS: We retrospectively followed up 81 MOWHTO cases for over 45 months on average. Pre- and postoperative mechanical axes were recorded. The JSWs and convergence angles were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 3-6, 9-12, and 21-24 months postoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean mechanical femoral-tibial angle improved from 8.1° varus to 2.4° valgus. At the aforementioned times, the respective mean values of MJSW were 2.6, 3.5, 3.8, 4.0, and 4.2 mm; mean convergence angles were 4.8°, 2.9°, 2.2°, 2.1°, and 1.9°; and the mean VAS scores were 7.2, 7.8, 4.8, 1.4, and 1.3. The MJSW continued to increase significantly in the first year postoperatively and then plateaued for a minimum of 2 years follow up after MOWHTO. The convergence angle decreased significantly in the first 6 months postoperatively and was then maintained. CONCLUSIONS: The MJSW, convergence angle, and VAS scores continued to improve through weight bearing during the first year after MOWHTO and were maintained for at least 2 years. Thus, JSW measurement may be an easy and representative way of radiographically monitoring the effect of MOWHTO.

A novel method for determining the Femoral-Tibial Angle of Knee Osteoarthritis on X-ray radiographs: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Femoral-tibial alignment is a prominent risk factor for Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) incidence and progression. One way of assessing alignment is by determining the Femoral-Tibial Angle (FTA). Several studies have investigated FTA determination; however, methods of assessment of FTA still present challenges. This paper introduces a new method for semi-automatic measurement of FTA as part of KOA research. Our novel approach combines preprocessing of X-ray images and the use of Active Shape Model (ASM) as the femoral and tibial segmentation method, followed by a thinning process. The result of the thinning process is used to predict FTA automatically by measuring the angle between the intersection of the two vectors of branching points on the femoral and tibial areas. The proposed method is trained on 10 x-ray images and tested on 50 different x-ray images of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) dataset. The outcomes of this approach were compared with manually obtained FTA measurements from the OAI dataset as the ground truth. Based on experiments, the difference in measurement results between the FTA of the OAI and the FTA obtained using our method is quite small, i.e., below 0.81° for the right FTA and below 0.77° for the left FTA with minimal average errors. This result indicates that this method is clinically suitable for semi-automatic measurement of the FTA.

Comparison of Alignment Correction Angles Between Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing UKA.

Good outcomes have been reported with both fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, overcorrected alignment could induce the progression of arthritis on the non-arthroplasty side. Changes of limb alignment after UKA with both types of bearings (fixed bearing: 24 knees, mobile bearing: 28 knees) were investigated. The mean difference between the preoperative standing femoral-tibial angle (FTA) and postoperative standing FTA was significantly larger in mobile bearing UKA group. In fixed-bearing UKA, there must be some laxity in MCL tension so that a 2-mm tension gauge can be inserted. In mobile-bearing UKA, appropriate MCL tension is needed to prevent bearing dislocation. This difference in MCL tension may have caused the difference in the correction angle between the groups.