Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is more accurate when performed by healthcare professionals compared to untrained parents: a diagnostic accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: Many countries ended their professional scoliosis screening due to ongoing controversies. Discontinuation resulted in a shift of screening responsibility from trained healthcare professionals to untrained parents. PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of picture-based scoliosis screening between parents and healthcare professionals. METHODS: In this cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study, parents and healthcare professionals assessed pictures of 28 children (20 AIS & 8 non-scoliosis). Each child had two photographs (standing position & full-flexion during forward-bending test) that were presented simultaneously. Lumbar and thoracic curves were represented with a range in severity (10 to > 40°). The assessors had to answer whether they detected an abnormality that ought to be referred to a specialist. Measures of accuracy were calculated for both groups and various curve severities. RESULTS: All pictures were assessed by 101 parents and 122 healthcare professionals. The sensitivity for detecting scoliosis was significantly lower in untrained parents (63.8%, [95% CI: 61.7-65.9%]) compared to healthcare professionals (73.4%, [95% CI: 71.6-75.2%]; p < 0.001), while the specificity was not significantly different (63.6%, [95% CI: 60.2-66.9%] vs. 65.3%, [95% CI: 62.2-68.3%]; p = 0.49). Healthcare professionals consistently recognized the gibbus as a warning sign when referring patients, while untrained parents highlighted various regions, including the spine, gibbus and scapula regions. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of screening for scoliosis was significantly lower when it was performed by parents, while the false-positive rate was similar to healthcare professionals. The window of opportunity for conservative treatment may be missed when parents rather than professionals are responsible for screening.

A simple method for assessing rotational flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: modified Adam's forward bending test.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic aptitude of a modified Adams forward bending test (MAFBT), which addresses the coupling phenomenon of axial rotation with reference to the side-bending movement. Also, this evaluation was facilitated by the introduction of our rotational flexibility index (RFI). METHODS: Thirty-two female and eight male AIS patients were included in this study from a single institution. In the MAFBT, subjects were asked to bend to the convex side of the curve in the forward bending position. Scoliometric measurements were done during the AFBT and MAFBT. Utilizing anteroposterior standing plain radiographs curve flexibility indices were calculated. The diagnostic aptitude of the MAFBT was evaluated based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). The RFI was also assessed, which considered AFBT and MAFBT parameters as a specified function. RESULTS: Significant correlations were noted between the Cobb angle and AFBT (p = 0.005), fulcrum bending and the MAFBT (p = 0.0001), side-bending and MAFBT (p = 0.0001). There were significant positive correlations between rotational flexibility as based on fulcrum bending radiograph to that of the RFI (r = 0.4, p = 0.036) and side-bending technique (r = 0.4, p = 0.008). Based on ROC analyses (AUC range 0.7-0.8), the MAFBT demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity rates for flexible and rigid curves, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report that the MAFBT is a simple and reliable test for the clinical assessment of rotational flexibility in AIS patients. The study further noted that the novel RFI has clinical utility in the assessment of AIS.

To screen or not to screen for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: Over the years, there has been much debate about the desirability and efficacy of screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. To analyse the current evidence from a public health point of view a renewed evaluation of the literature was performed. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. METHODS: We performed two literature searches: from January 2000 to April 2015 for systematic reviews or guidelines on screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and from January 2009 to April 2015 for all studies on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and screening methods. We evaluated if screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis fulfils the criteria of the UK National Screenings Committee for appraising a screening programme. RESULTS: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a condition with an unpredictable natural history. The optimal age and frequency of screening are unknown; it is not possible to predict which patients will need (conservative or surgical) treatment. The Forward Bending Test has a positive predictive value of 2.6% and a sensitivity of 56% (95% CI 23-88%) for (conservative or surgical) treatment, and is therefore not valid enough for use in a screening programme. There seems to be sufficient evidence that brace treatment is effective for preventing progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. It is not clear if screening is cost effective. CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence that brace treatment is effective for preventing progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the benefits from the screening programme do not outweigh the harms. From a Public Health point of view, there is not enough evidence to support a screening programme for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Idiopathic Scoliosis in Korean Middle School Students: Prevalence study / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To update and reevaluate the scoliosis prevalence in middle school students in Korea, and correlate those data with past references and other countries general prevalence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among the middle schools in Seoul city, forty-five middle schools were randomly selected for screening. Total number of students were 46,428 who were screened for the prevalence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. There were 24,892 boys and 21,536 girls. Their age ranged from 12 to 15 years. Adams forward bending test and "Scoliometer" (Orthopaedic Systems, Inc, USA) were used to detect and measure the degree of rotation of trunk. Students more than 5 (ATR were assessed subsequently by standardized clinical and radiological examinations. RESULTS: Using 10 degrees as cut-off points, 465 students were found to have structural idiopathic scoliosis, representing a prevalence of 0.9% overall. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of the scoliosis has not changed from previously estimated rates in Korea, which was about 20 years ago. It nearly approximates with the prevalence of the world wide reported. We also confirmed that it is not necessary to issue a mass screening, considering the cost and effectiveness aspect, due to its low prevalence.