The first report of leukocytoclastic vasculitis induced by once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide.

INTRODUCTION: Leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) is a small vessel vasculitis involving arterioles, capillaries and postcapillary venules. LCV is generally confined to the skin, with extracutaneous manifestations occurring less frequently. LCV has multiple potential etiologies. Indeed, histological LCV can be found in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, immune complex vasculitis, vasculitis associated with systemic diseases (i.e. sarcoidosis, Sjögren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus), or in vasculitis associated with cancer, infections, sepsis and use of certain medications. LCV can also be idiopathic in up to 50% of cases. CASE REPORT: Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist used for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity and overweight associated with one or more weight-related comorbidities. A case of drug-induced LCV has already been described with the use of once-daily oral semaglutide. Herein, we describe the first case of skin-limited LCV induced by once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in a 73-year-old man with T2DM, who experienced the complete resolution of the skin lesions shortly after the discontinuation of semaglutide therapy. CONCLUSION: Future prospective studies, adverse event reporting and post-marketing surveillance will certainly contribute to establishing if LCV represents a less rare than expected side effect of both oral and subcutaneous semaglutide formulations.

2024 UPDATE: the Brazilian Diabetes Society position on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in people with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most common liver disease affecting 30% of the world's population and is often associated with metabolic disorders such as metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and cardiovascular disease. This review is an update of the Brazilian Diabetes Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes [SBD]) evidence-based guideline for the management of MASLD in clinical practice. METHODS: The methodology was published previously and was defined by the internal institutional steering committee. The SBD Metabolic Syndrome and Prediabetes Department drafted the manuscript, selecting key clinical questions for a narrative review using MEDLINE via PubMed with the MeSH terms [diabetes] and [fatty liver]. The best available evidence was reviewed, including randomized clinical trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and high-quality observational studies related to MASLD. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The SBD Metabolic Syndrome and Prediabetes Department formulated 9 recommendations for the management of MASLD in people with prediabetes or T2D. Screening for the risk of advanced fibrosis associated with MASLD is recommended in all adults with prediabetes or T2D. Lifestyle modification (LSM) focusing on a reduction in body weight of at least 5% is recommended as the first choice for these patients. In situations where LSMs are insufficient to achieve weight loss, the use of anti-obesity medications is recommended for those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kg/m2. Pioglitazone and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) monotherapy are the first-line pharmacological treatments for steatohepatitis in people with T2D, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may be considered in this context. The combination of these agents may be considered in the treatment of steatohepatitis and/or fibrosis, and bariatric surgery should be considered in patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, in which the combination of LSM and pharmacotherapy has not been shown to be effective in improving MASLD.

Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardioprotective glucose-lowering therapies for type 2 diabetes in Brazil: a Bayesian network model.

BACKGROUND: The escalating prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) poses an unparalleled economic catastrophe to developing countries. Cardiovascular diseases remain the primary source of costs among individuals with T2DM, incurring expenses for medications, hospitalizations, and surgical interventions. Compelling evidence suggests that the risk of cardiovascular outcomes can be reduced by three classes of glucose-lowering therapies (GLT), including SGLT2i, GLP-1A, and pioglitazone. However, an evidence-based and cost-effective protocol is still unavailable for many countries. The objective of the current study is to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of GLT in individuals with T2DM in Brazil. METHODS: We employed Bayesian Networks to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), expressed in international dollars (Int$) per disease-adjusted life years [DALYs] averted. To determine the effectiveness of GLT, we conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide insights for our model. Additionally, we obtained cardiovascular outcome incidence data from two real-world cohorts comprising 851 and 1337 patients in primary and secondary prevention, respectively. Our cost analysis took into account the perspective of the Brazilian public health system, and all values were converted to Int$. RESULTS: In the NMA, SGLT2i [HR: 0.81 (95% CI 0.69-0.96)], GLP-1A [HR: 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.94)], and pioglitazone [HR: 0.73 (95% CI 0.59-0.91)] demonstrated reduced relative risks of non-fatal cardiovascular events. In the context of primary prevention, pioglitazone yielded 0.2339 DALYs averted, with an ICER of Int$7,082 (95% CI 4,521-10,770) per DALY averted when compared to standard care. SGLT2i and GLP-1A also increased effectiveness, resulting in 0.261 and 0.259 DALYs averted, respectively, but with higher ICERs of Int$12,061 (95% CI: 7,227-18,121) and Int$29,119 (95% CI: 23,811-35,367) per DALY averted. In the secondary prevention scenario, all three classes of treatments were deemed cost-effective at a maximum willingness-to-pay threshold of Int$26,700. Notably, pioglitazone consistently exhibited the highest probability of being cost-effective in both scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil, pioglitazone presented a higher probability of being cost-effective both in primary and secondary prevention, followed by SGLT2i and GLP-1A. Our findings support the use of cost-effectiveness models to build optimized and hierarchical therapeutic strategy in the management of T2DM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42020194415.

2023 UPDATE: Luso-Brazilian evidence-based guideline for the management of antidiabetic therapy in type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The management of antidiabetic therapy in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has evolved beyond glycemic control. In this context, Brazil and Portugal defined a joint panel of four leading diabetes societies to update the guideline published in 2020. METHODS: The panelists searched MEDLINE (via PubMed) for the best evidence from clinical studies on treating T2D and its cardiorenal complications. The panel searched for evidence on antidiabetic therapy in people with T2D without cardiorenal disease and in patients with T2D and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), or diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The degree of recommendation and the level of evidence were determined using predefined criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All people with T2D need to have their cardiovascular (CV) risk status stratified and HbA1c, BMI, and eGFR assessed before defining therapy. An HbA1c target of less than 7% is adequate for most adults, and a more flexible target (up to 8%) should be considered in frail older people. Non-pharmacological approaches are recommended during all phases of treatment. In treatment naïve T2D individuals without cardiorenal complications, metformin is the agent of choice when HbA1c is 7.5% or below. When HbA1c is above 7.5% to 9%, starting with dual therapy is recommended, and triple therapy may be considered. When HbA1c is above 9%, starting with dual therapyt is recommended, and triple therapy should be considered. Antidiabetic drugs with proven CV benefit (AD1) are recommended to reduce CV events if the patient is at high or very high CV risk, and antidiabetic agents with proven efficacy in weight reduction should be considered when obesity is present. If HbA1c remains above target, intensification is recommended with triple, quadruple therapy, or even insulin-based therapy. In people with T2D and established ASCVD, AD1 agents (SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RA with proven CV benefit) are initially recommended to reduce CV outcomes, and metformin or a second AD1 may be necessary to improve glycemic control if HbA1c is above the target. In T2D with HF, SGLT2 inhibitors are recommended to reduce HF hospitalizations and mortality and to improve HbA1c. In patients with DKD, SGLT2 inhibitors in combination with metformin are recommended when eGFR is above 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. SGLT2 inhibitors can be continued until end-stage kidney disease.

Advances in GLP-1 treatment: focus on oral semaglutide.

BACKGROUND: There is currently a large arsenal of antidiabetic drugs available to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, this is a serious chronic disease that affects millions of adults worldwide and is responsible for severe complications, comorbidities, and low quality of life when uncontrolled due mainly to delays in initiating treatment or inadequate therapy. This review article aims to clarify the therapeutic role of the oral formulation of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) semaglutide in treating typical T2D patients. The discussion focused on metabolic, glycemic, and weight alteration effects and the safety of the therapy with this drug. MAIN TEXT: Therapy with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) promotes strategic changes in the pathophysiological pathway of T2D and improves the secretion of glucagon and insulin, which results in a reduction in blood glucose levels and the promotion of weight loss. Until recently, the only route for semaglutide administration was parenteral. However, an oral formulation of GLP-1 RA was recently developed and approved by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on the Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment (PIONEER) program results. A sequence of 10 clinical studies compared oral semaglutide with placebo or active standard-of-care medications (empagliflozin 25 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, or liraglutide 1.8 mg) in different T2D populations. CONCLUSIONS: Oral semaglutide effectively reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and body weight in a broad spectrum of patients with T2D and shows cardiovascular safety. Oral semaglutide broadens therapy options and facilitates the adoption of earlier GLP-1 RA treatment once T2D patients present low rates of treatment discontinuation. The main adverse events reported were related to the gastrointestinal tract, common to GLP-1 RA class drugs.

[Cardiovascular effects of new non-insulinic anti-diabetes drugs]. / Efectos cardiovasculares de los nuevos fármacos no insulínicos en diabetes.

Diabetes mellitus is currently a serious public health problem worldwide, that increases the risk of presenting microvascular and macrovascular complications. Although achieving the recommended blood glucose goals reduces the risk of microvascular complications, the effect of the drugs used to treat hyperglycemia on macrovascular complications and cardiovascular death is a cause for concern. In this context, the regulatory agencies have modified the regulations for the approval of new drugs in diabetes, by adding the need to demonstrate that they are capable of lowering blood glucose levels together with a solid assessment of cardiovascular safety. The objective of this study is to review the cardiovascular effects of the new families of non-insulin drugs, with special emphasis on their effect on the risk of major cardiovascular events. In recent years, it has finally been confirmed that some of the drugs used to treat diabetes are not only safe from a cardiovascular point of view, but have even shown capacity to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The evidence obtained determined the updating of some current therapeutic guidelines when cardiovascular risk should be considered a fundamental variable at the time of therapeutic choice in patients with diabetes.

Efectos cardiovasculares de los nuevos fármacos no insulínicos en diabetes / Cardiovascular effects of new non-insulinic anti-diabetes drugs]

La diabetes mellitus constituye actualmente un grave problema de salud pública a nivel mundial, que incrementa el riesgo de presentar complicaciones tanto microvasculares como macrovasculares. Aunque lograr los objetivos de glucemia recomendados reduce el riesgo de complicaciones microvasculares, el efecto de los fármacos para tratar la hiperglucemia sobre las complicaciones macrovasculares y la muerte cardiovascular es motivo de preocupación. En este contexto, las agencias regulatorias han modificado la normativa para la aprobación de nuevos fármacos en diabetes, de forma que establecen la necesidad de demostrar que son capaces de disminuir la glucemia junto con una evaluación sólida de la seguridad cardiovascular. El objetivo de este trabajo es revisar los efectos cardiovasculares de las nuevas familias de fármacos no insulínicos, en especial en su efecto sobre el riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares mayores. En los últimos años, finalmente, se ha confirmado que algunos fármacos para tratar la diabetes no solo son seguros desde el punto de vista cardiovascular, sino que incluso han mostrado capacidad para reducir el riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular en la diabetes mellitus tipo 2. La evidencia obtenida ha determinado la actualización de algunas guías terapéuticas vigentes cuando el riesgo cardiovascular debería considerarse una variable fundamental al momento de la elección terapéutica en pacientes con diabetes.

Diabetes mellitus is currently a serious public health problem worldwide, that increases the risk of presenting microvascular and macrovascular complications. Although achieving the recommended blood glucose goals reduces the risk of microvascular complications, the effect of the drugs used to treat hyperglycemia on macrovascular complications and cardiovascular death is a cause for concern. In this context, the regulatory agencies have modified the regulations for the approval of new drugs in diabetes, by adding the need to demonstrate that they are capable of lowering blood glucose levels together with a solid assessment of cardiovascular safety. The objective of this study is to review the cardiovascular effects of the new families of non-insulin drugs, with special emphasis on their effect on the risk of major cardiovascular events. In recent years, it has finally been confirmed that some of the drugs used to treat diabetes are not only safe from a cardiovascular point of view, but have even shown capacity to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The evidence obtained determined the updating of some current therapeutic guidelines when cardiovascular risk should be considered a fundamental variable at the time of therapeutic choice in patients with diabetes.