Is #Gender Affirmation Surgery Trending? An Analysis of Plastic Surgery Residency Social Media Content.

Purpose: Given rising demand for gender affirmation surgery (GAS), lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and others' (LGBTQ+) patient care, and sexual and gender minority (SGM) representation in plastic surgery, we sought to analyze integrated residency programs' posts for LGBTQ+ content. Methods: Programs were identified from the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons website. Accounts were searched for on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Posts uploaded through June 24, 2021 were analyzed. Mann-Whitney U- and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare content between programs. Results: Of 82 programs, 76 (92.7%), 31 (37.8%), and 30 (36.6%) have Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter accounts, respectively. Two hundred eighty-one (1.3%) posts displayed LGBTQ+ content, including educational (29.9%), research (17.4%), news (11.0%), resident interests (10.7%), pride/diversity (9.6%), posts to attract applicants/patients (7.5%), operative/clinic cases (6.8%), faculty spotlights (6.4%), and patient testimonials (1.1%). One hundred eighty-one (64.4%) posts described GAS overall, 42 (23.2%) described top, 32 (17.7%) described genital, and 32 (17.7%) described facial surgery. Instagram and Facebook have more LGBTQ+ content than Twitter (p≤0.037). Newly accredited programs have significantly more LGBTQ+ content on Facebook (p=0.036). Programs in the West, having more perceived prestige, or GAS fellowships tended to have more LGBTQ+ content. Conclusion: Despite growing demand for GAS and thus training, 1% of content on plastic surgery residency social media accounts is LGBTQ+ related. Reasons for lack of representation require further investigation but may include (1) limited GAS and LGBTQ+ patient exposure during training or (2) lack of SGM inclusivity for residents, faculty, and patients.

Mandibular Gender Dimorphism: The Utility of Artificial Intelligence and Statistical Shape Modeling in Skeletal Facial Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In gender-affirming surgery, facial skeletal dimorphism is an important topic for every craniofacial surgeon. Few cephalometric studies have assessed this topic; however, they fall short to provide skeletal contour insights that direct surgical planning. Herein, we propose statistical shape modeling (SSM) as a novel tool for investigating mandibular dimorphism for young white individuals. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study was performed using computed tomography (CT) scans of white individuals, aged 20 to 39 years old. AI-assisted, three-dimensional (3D) mandibles were reconstructed in Materialise Mimics v25.0. We used SSM to generate average 3D models for both genders. Relevant manual anthropometric measurements were taken for the SSMs and individual mandibles. Contour disparities were then represented using 3D overlays and heatmaps. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired student t testing or Wilcoxon signed rank testing with 95% confidence interval as deemed appropriate by population-level normality assessment. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients (53 females, 45 males) were included. Male mandibles showed greater bigonial width, intercondylar width, ramus height, and body length [p<0.005]. There was no statistically significant difference in the gonial angle measurements [p=0.62]. All relevant manual individual measurements demonstrated excellent concordance to their SSM counterparts. The 3D overlays of SSMs revealed squarer male chins with more lateral but less anterior projection than their female counterparts. Also, the female mandibles showed smoother transition at the gonial angle. CONCLUSIONS: SSM provides a novel tool to objectively evaluate volumetric and contour dimorphisms between genders. Moreover, this method can be automated, allowing for expedited comparisons between populations of interest compared to manual assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 . Bullet points about the importance of this work: Advancing Anthropometric Assessment: Statistical shape modeling (SSM) offers a cutting-edge approach to visualizing gender-specific skeletal anatomic differences for aesthetic and gender-affirming facial surgery. Expediting Comparative Analysis: The workflow established in this paper streamlines the evaluative process, enabling rapid morphologic comparisons between populations. Patient-Centered Care: This study establishes a foundation for the development of SSMs in individualized operative planning.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Feminizing Gender Affirmation Genital Surgery: A Novel Approach.

Background Gender dysphoria is treated with gender affirmation surgery (GAS) for assigned male at birth (AMAB) individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative anatomical changes in AMAB individuals who underwent GAS using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to compare it with cis-females, thereby assessing the efficacy of the surgical technique in achieving pelvic anatomy similar to cis-females. Methodology This was a prospective observational study done in a tertiary care hospital. AMAB individuals who underwent gender affirmation genital surgery using single-stage solely penile skin inversion vaginoplasty were included after informed consent and approval by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee. Patients with complications such as deep space surgical site infection (SSI) and neo-vaginal prolapse were excluded. All the study participants were advised a vaginal self-dilatation regimen, reviewed three months after the surgery, and subjected to an MRI of the pelvis with a vaginal tutor. Parameters such as neo-vaginal depth, alpha (α) angle, rectovaginal thickness, and remnant of corpora cavernosa were measured and compared with cis-female parameters measured from images in the archives from the Department of Radiology. Result A total of 21 patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 27±4.7. Between the study group and cis-females, no significant difference was seen in vaginal depth, and cis-females had significantly higher values in other parameters. There was a significant difference between the subgroups, i.e., defaulters and non-defaulters in soft tissue parameters such as vaginal depth (p=0.001), α angle (p=0.002), and rectovaginal thickness (p=0.002) with the non-defaulter patients having higher values. Conclusion Single-stage penile skin inversion vaginoplasty is capable of producing anatomical parameters, importantly neo-vaginal depth, which is fairly comparable with cis-female, as evident in the non-defaulter subgroup patients. Proper compliance with the vaginal dilatation regimen plays a significant role in the maintenance of soft tissue pelvic anatomical parameters.

Flattening the Curve and Cutting Corners-Pearls and Pitfalls Facial Gender Affirming Surgery.

Study Design: This is an experiential article based on the past 6 years experience of providing facial gender confirmation surgery (fGAS) at an academic medical center. Objective: While trainees are getting increasing exposure to aspects of facial gender affirming surgery (fGAS), the gap between trained providers and patients who can access care is currently still widening. A handful of fellowships across the country have emerged that include fGAS in their curriculum, but it will take another decade before the principles of affirming care and surgeries are systematically taught. Fortunately, the surgical principles and techniques required to perform fGAS are part of the skill set of any specialty surgeon trained in adult craniofacial trauma and esthetic facial surgery/rhinoplasty. It is the aim of this article to provide directly applicable knowledge with the goal to assist surgeons who consider offering fGAS in flattening the learning curve and hopefully contribute to increasing the quality of care provided for the transgender and gender diverse population. We hope to provide the reader with a very tangible article with the aims to 1) provide a simple systematic framework for an affirming consultation and preoperative assessment and 2) provide translatable surgical pearls and pitfalls for forehead feminization and gonial angle resection. The frontal sinus set back and gonial angle resection in our opinion are the most unique aspect to fGAS as rhinoplasty, genioplasty and other associated procedures (e.g., fat grafting) follow well established principles. We hope that the value of this article lies in the translatability of the presented principle to any practice setting without the need for VSP, special surgical instruments or technology beyond basic craniofacial tools. Methods: This is an experiential article based on the senior authors 6 year experience offering fGAS in an academic setting. The article is structured to outline both pearls and pittfalls and is supplemented by photographs and a surgical video. Results: A total of 19 pearls and pitfalls are outlined in the article. Conclusions: Facial gender affirming surgery mostly follows established craniofacial and esthetic surgery principles. Forehead feminization and gonial angle feminization are the 2 components that diverge most from established surgical techniques and this article hopefully provides guidance to shorten the learning curve of surgeons.

Appropriate Use of Preoperative Imaging in Feminization Cranioplasty.

Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine if proceeding with feminization frontal cranioplasty without preoperative imaging adversely affected patient outcomes. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing frontal cranioplasty for facial feminization at a single tertiary care center between 2013 and 2019. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (JS), who operated at multiple sites. The site selected is where the majority of these procedures were performed during this time. Type of cranioplasty (I vs III) was recorded. Primary outcomes included postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, entering the cranium, or dural exposure or injury. Results: 422 subjects underwent cranioplasty for facial feminization between 2013 and 2019. No preoperative imaging was performed. Zero patients had CSF leak. 334 subjects (79%) had type III cranioplasty, while the remaining 88 subjects (21%) had type I cranioplasty. No subjects had documented episodes of dural injury, or postoperative brain or cranial concerns. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that frontal cranioplasty for facial feminization does not require routine preoperative imaging. The authors recommend preoperative imaging for patients with a history of congenital cranial abnormality, prior significant head trauma affecting the frontal bone, and in some cases where the patient has had prior surgery or a history of sinus disease or extensive polyposis. Routine preoperative computed tomography is therefore not indicated for patients undergoing feminizing cranioplasty.

Objective Photoanalysis of Feminizing Frontal Cranioplasty Outcomes.

Study Design: Retrospective analysis at a tertiary care center. Objective: This study describes a method of analyzing postoperative results using lateral view clinical photographs to create normalized projection ratios of the glabella and radix. Methods: We reviewed preoperative and postoperative photographs of 15 patients. All photographs were in the lateral view Frankfort horizontal plane. We calculated the distances between the (a) tragus and cornea, (b) cornea and radix, (c) cornea and glabella, and the (θ) nasofrontal angle. Results: Fifteen sets of patient photographs were analyzed and found that there was a favorable 14% reduction at the radix and an even greater reduction (78.9%) at the glabella. The nasofrontal angle was improved to a more feminine range from 131.84° preoperatively to 145.86° postoperatively. Conclusions: Normalized projection ratios of the glabella and radix, along with the nasofrontal angle, can be used to objectively measure outcomes of frontal feminizing cranioplasty.

Sexual Function in Post-surgical Transgender and Gender Diverse Individuals.

Surgical treatment for gender dysphoria consists of facial, chest, and genital surgery. Chest and genital gender affirmation surgeries alter the form and function of the native organs. This can have a profound impact on sexual function for transgender and gender- diverse individuals. In this article, the authors will discuss the impacts that chest and genital gender affirmation surgeries can have on sexual function.

Ambulatory facial feminization surgery: a comparative analysis of outcomes and complications.

BACKGROUND: To date, there are no studies investigating the safety and outcomes of facial feminization surgery (FFS) as an outpatient procedure. This is the first study of its kind analyzing the outcomes of ambulatory FFS based on a comparison of complications, post-operative emergency department or urgent care (ED/UC) visits, and readmissions between patients who underwent FFS with admission versus same-day surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent FFS in a single integrated healthcare system. Patient charts were reviewed for operative details, complications, post-operative ED/UC visits, readmission, and demographic factors. Major outcomes including complications, readmissions, and ED/UC visits were compared between groups with same-day discharge and post-operative hospital admission. RESULTS: Of 242 patients included in the study, ED/UC visits were comparable between patients discharged same-day (18.2%) and patients admitted post-operatively (21.6%, p = 0.52). Logistic regression showed no significant difference in the composite outcomes of minor complications, major complications, and readmissions (15.6% for ambulatory versus 19.3% for admission, p = 0.46). Temporary nerve palsy, infection, and hematoma were the most common post-operative complications. However, covariates of a lower face procedure and operative time were shown to have significant differences in the composite complication outcome (p = 0.04 and p = 0.045, respectively). CONCLUSION: Ambulatory FFS is a safe practice with no associated increase in adverse outcomes including complications, ED/UC visits, and readmission when compared to post-operative admission. Adoption of same-day FFS should be considered by high-volume gender health centers to potentially benefit from increased scheduling flexibility and efficiency, increased access to care, and lower healthcare costs.

Preoperative hypocoagulative state is an independent risk factor for wound complications and infection in gender-affirming bottom surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Bottom gender affirmation surgery (GAS) involves the risks of bleeding and associated complications. Effective preoperative blood management is paramount across surgical disciplines with international normalized ratio (INR)≤1.5 advised prior to certain surgeries. This study aimed to examine the proportion of patients who were hypocoagulative before they underwent bottom GAS and assess the influence of hypocoagulability on their 30-day post-operative outcomes. METHOD: A retrospective study on female-to-male (FtM) and male-to-female (MtF) bottom GAS was performed based on American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2021. Patients with hypocoagulation were identified when PTT> 60 s, PT > 30 s, and/or INR> 2. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the 30-day perioperative outcomes between patients with hypocoagulation and controls. RESULTS: In this study, 380 patients (182 FtM, 198 MtF) with hypocoagulation and 1176 controls (886 FtM, 310 MtF) were included. Mortality and organ system complications were infrequent in both groups. Patients with hypocoagulation had higher wound complication rates (13.68% vs. 2.64%, aOR 2.858, p < 0.01), especially wound dehiscence (10.00% vs. 0.60%, aOR 4.424, p < 0.01) and organ space infection rates (2.11% vs. 0.26%, aOR 12.77, p < 0.01). Additionally, patients with hypocoagulation had higher sepsis (0.79% vs. 0.09%, aOR 15.508, p = 0.04) and readmission rates (4.74% vs. 2.47%, aOR 1.919, p = 0.03), but lower rates of discharge not to home (7.92% vs. 25.38%, aOR 0.324, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Preoperative hypocoagulative state is observed in approximately a quarter of the patients undergoing bottom GAS and is an independent risk factor for increased risks of 30-day wound complications and infections. Therefore, meticulous monitoring of preoperative hemostasis and implementing hemostasis control before surgery may be necessary. Thus, it may be advisable to discontinue oral anticoagulants before the surgery.

Gender Affirming Facial Surgery-Anatomy and Procedures for Facial Masculinization.

For some patients, feminine facial features may cause significant gender dysphoria. Multiple nonsurgical and surgical techniques exist to masculinize facial features. Nonsurgical techniques include testosterone supplementation and dermal fillers. Surgical techniques include soft tissue manipulation, synthetic implants, regenerative scaffolding, or bony reconstruction. Many techniques are derived from experience with cisgender patients, but are adapted with special considerations to differing anatomy between cisgender and transgender men and women. Currently, facial masculinization is less commonly sought than feminization, but demand is likely to increase as techniques are refined and made available.

A systematic review of surgical simulation in gender affirmation surgery.

The burgeoning field of gender affirmation surgery (GAS) has become increasingly complex, challenging plastic surgeons to meet high standards for their patients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the emphasis on remote learning ushered in the increased use of surgical simulation training, offering residents the opportunity to trial challenging procedures before treating patients. This systematic review seeks to summarize current simulation training models used in GAS. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA-P guidelines using the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were English-language peer-reviewed articles on surgical simulation techniques or training related to the field of gender surgery. Skills and techniques taught and assessed, model type, equipment, and cost were abstracted from articles. Our search criteria identified 1650 articles, 10 of which met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. Simulation models included those that involved cadavers (n = 2), synthetic benchtop (n = 5), augmented/virtual reality (n = 2), and 3D-printed interfaces (n = 1). The most common procedure involved breast or pectoral reconstruction and/or augmentation (n = 5), followed by vaginal reconstruction (n = 3). One simulation model involved facial GAS. All models focused on surgical technique and anatomy, three on suture skills or knot-tying, and one on surgical decision-making. The evolving field of GAS requires that plastic surgery trainees be knowledgeable on surgical techniques surrounding this scope of practice. Surgical simulation not only teaches residents how to master techniques but also helps address the sensitive nature of GAS.

Isolated and combined breast augmentation in transgender patients: Multi-institutional insights into early outcomes and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: The increasing demand for gender-affirming surgery (GAS) in transgender and gender-diverse healthcare highlights the importance of breast augmentation surgery (BAS) for transfeminine patients. Despite its significance, there is a lack of research on postoperative outcomes of BAS. METHODS: We analyzed the multi-institutional American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) (2008-2021) database to identify female transgender individuals (TGIs) who underwent BAS surgery, both isolated and combined with concurrent GAS procedures. We evaluated 30-day outcomes, including the incidence of mortality, reoperation, readmission as well as surgical and medical complication occurrence. RESULTS: Of 1699 female TGIs, 92% underwent isolated BAS and 7.7% underwent combined BAS. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 36 ± 12 years and 27 ± 6.6 kg/m2, respectively. Isolated BAS showed a 2.8% complication rate, while combined BAS had a higher rate with 9.1%. Specifically, all complications occurred in patients undergoing BAS with concurrent genitourinary surgery (n = 85; 14%), whereas no adverse events were recorded after combined BAS and facial feminization (n = 19) or chondrolaryngoplasty (n = 19). In patients seeking combined BAS, advanced age (p = 0.05) and nicotine abuse (p = 0.004) were identified as risk factors predisposing to adverse events, whereas American Society of Anesthesiology class 1 was found to be protective (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated BAS in TGIs demonstrates a positive safety profile. Combined surgeries, particularly with genitourinary procedures, pose higher risks. Identifying risk factors such as smoking and advanced age is crucial for patient selection and surgical planning. These findings can aid in refining patient eligibility and inform surgical decision-making for BAS.

Feminization Surgery of the Upper Face as the Crucial Factor in Gender Confirmation-Pearls and Pitfalls.

Background: Upper-face feminization is a frequently executed procedure in sexual reassignment surgery, owing to its ability to influence gender identity through adjustments to the hairline, forehead, and peri-orbital area. The procedure includes reducing the hairline, lifting the brows, shaving the orbital region, and applying specific techniques to reduce the frontal bone. This research aims to assess the outcomes, results, and potential complications associated with this surgery among transgender patients. Material and Method: Retrospective review of medical records of 20 patients who attended for facial feminization surgery of the upper face between June 2022 and June 2023, analyzing the previously performed procedures, complications and revision surgery outcomes, and first-time procedures. A literature review was performed for similar studies. Results: 20 patients were included in the study. Among the cohort treated elsewhere (n = 11), the primary complaint was insufficient browbone reduction and anterior frontal sinus table setback. They underwent poorly performed Type 1 reduction when full forehead reconstruction (Type 3/4) was indicated (n = 3), or no reduction was performed during hairline advancement (n = 4). Type 3 forehead reduction with orbital shaving and hairline advancement with simultaneous temporal browlift was most commonly performed in both revision and first-time surgical upper face feminization (n = 15) (75%). Type 1 osteoplasty was performed in four patients (10%), one Type 3 revision surgery was performed after insufficient Type 3 reduction, and one case of shock-induced alopecia was reported, treated with PRP/peptides and a FUE hair graft. Conclusions: The author's preferred technique, 'whole-in-one' upper face feminization by modified bi-coronal incision with frontal trichophytic hyper-beveled incision, provides sufficient insight into the frontal bone and orbital region, the desired forehead osteoplasty and the most efficient insight into the temporal area, enabling safe dissection between fasciae, ligamentous adhesion removal, and periosteal attachment, providing full soft and hard tissue feminization. Nevertheless, feminization procedures should be meticulously planned, and all concerning issues should be addressed during the first surgery in order to prevent revisions, complications, and patient dissatisfaction.

Esthetic Surgery of the Chin in Cis- and Transgender Patients-Application of T-Genioplasty vs. Single-Piece Segment Lateralization.

Background and Objectives: Correction of lower face asymmetry still remains challenging in maxillofacial surgery. This report describes techniques for the lateral transposition of the symphyseal segment to restore lower face symmetry while maintaining gender-related features in cis- and transgender patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of medical records of 31 patients who attended for esthetic corrective surgery after orthodontic camouflage or orthognathic treatment, or during facial feminization of the lower face between June 2021 and June 2023 was performed. Result: All patients underwent lateralization genioplasty (with or without advancement or setback), either with or without narrowing T-osteotomy supplemented with necessary procedures in order to obtain proper facial balance and desired esthetical effects, such as bichectomy, liposuction, and face and neck lift. The mean asymmetry of the chin was 5.15 mm and was surgically corrected either by single segment lateralization or T-shape narrowing genioplasty depending on the gender and esthetical requirements. No complications were reported. Conclusions: Lateral shift genioplasty serves as a powerful tool in primary and secondary corrective surgery for lower face asymmetry that maintains gender-specific facial features. It may serve either as an additive to orthodontic camouflage or a way to correct previous orthognathic surgery pitfalls. The surgeon performing esthetic genioplasty associated with gender-specific expectations must be trained in facelift and facial liposculpting techniques in order to provide the best results and properly choose the right procedures for the right patients.

Trends of Medicare reimbursement rates for gender affirmation procedures.

BACKGROUND: While nearly 1 in 5 Americans receives health insurance coverage through Medicare, literature suggests that Medicare reimbursement is lagging behind inflation for many plastic surgery procedures. AIM: This article evaluates trends in Medicare reimbursement for gender affirmation procedures. METHODS: The most common gender affirmation procedures performed at an urban academic medical center were identified in this cross-sectional study (level 4 evidence). Five nongender surgery codes were evaluated for reference. A standardized formula utilizing relative value units (RVUs) was used to calculate monetary data. Differences in reimbursement between 2014 and 2021 were calculated for each procedure. OUTCOME: The main outcome was inflation-adjusted difference of charges from 2014 to 2021. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2021, Medicare reimbursement for gender affirmation procedures had an inflation-unadjusted average change of -0.09% (vs +5.63% for the selected nongender codes) and an inflation-adjusted change of -10.03% (vs -5.54% for the selected nongender codes). Trends in reimbursement varied by category of gender-affirming procedure. The overall average compound annual growth rate had a change of -0.99% (vs -0.53% for the selected nongender codes). The average changes in work, facility, and malpractice RVUs were -1.05%, +9.52%, and -0.93%, respectively. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Gender surgeons and patients should be aware that the decrease in reimbursement may affect access to gender-affirming care. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Our study is one of the first evaluating the reimbursement rates associated with the full spectrum of gender affirmation surgery. However, our study is limited by its cross-sectional nature. CONCLUSIONS: From 2014 to 2021, Medicare reimbursement for gender affirmation procedures lagged inflation.

[Psychiatric, socio-legal and perioperative aspects of vaginoplasty]. / Psychiatrische, sozialrechtliche und perioperative Aspekte bei der Vaginoplastik.

The number of scientific papers on gender-confirming surgeries as well as the surgeries themselves have increased by leaps and bounds in recent years. This leads to sometimes considerable waiting times for people seeking treatment. Social media and the internet do not always provide reliable and high-quality information. Therefore, it is necessary that both surgically and conservatively active urologists are familiar with topics regarding transgender persons. The establishment of structured training, the guarantee of minimum quality standards in the treatment of transgender persons and the further education and training of medical staff pose particular challenges. The German Society for Urology (DGU) and the German Society for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (DGPRÄC) have already founded their own working groups on the surgical side, which coordinate their work. Under the auspices of the professional societies DGU and DGPRÄC, a guideline on surgical procedures for gender incongruence was developed under the umbrella of the AWMF ("Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften") which is currently being finalised. For a long time, the health care of transgender people has been moving in a field of tension between the right of self-determination of those seeking treatment, on the one hand, and the fear of making the wrong medical decisions, on the other. In contrast to most other conditions in urology, the goal of treatment is largely determined by the person seeking treatment and does not necessarily follow predetermined schedules or content. The treatment should primarily aim at reducing the individual's suffering and promoting quality of life.

Exposure of plastic surgery and urology registrars in the United Kingdom to gender affirming care of transgender patients: A cross-sectional survey of training programme directors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the expected duration of exposure of United Kingdom urology and plastic surgery trainees to the provision of gender affirming healthcare to transgender patients. This observational, cross-sectional survey asked UK training programme directors (TPDs) to report the volume of training in gender affirming care of transgender patients that urology and plastic surgery trainees are expected to receive. METHODS: A Google Form online questionnaire was distributed to each regional TPD in the UK both for plastic surgery and urology. RESULTS: Eleven of 14 TPDs in plastic surgery and 13 of 19 urology TPDs completed the survey with responses representing 487 trainees. The total estimated exposure of UK trainees to any aspect of gender affirming healthcare was a median of one hour of training per trainee per year (clinical or didactic). Thirteen deaneries reported that trainees received some (didactic or clinical) training in transgender care each year. Only eight of these deaneries reported provision of direct clinical training. The remaining eleven deaneries reported that trainees received no training in gender affirming care. No training was expected to take place for any trainee of either speciality within multi-disciplinary team meetings or in masculinising genital surgery. CONCLUSION: The above evidence demonstrates the low exposure of plastic surgery and urology registrar trainees to gender affirming care during their training years in the UK.

A randomized trial comparing perioperative pelvic FLOor physical therapy to current standard of care in transgender Women undergoing vaginoplasty for gendER affirmation: the FLOWER Trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There are sparse data on the use of postoperative pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) in patients undergoing vaginoplasty. The primary objective of this study was to compare the impact of PFPT on the ease of vaginal dilation after vaginoplasty in transgender women. We hypothesized that patients undergoing PFPT would report better ease of vaginal dilation following surgery. METHODS: This was a randomized trial of transgender women undergoing vaginoplasty. Patients were randomized to either no PFPT or PFPT 3 and 6 weeks following surgery. Subjects completed the Pelvic Floor Disorders Inventory and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire at baseline and at 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, subjects underwent vaginal length measurement and completed the Patient Global Impression of Improvement and a visual analogue scale (0-10) for ease of vaginal dilation and pain with dilation. A total of 17 subjects in each arm were needed to detect a significant difference in ease of dilation between the two groups. RESULTS: Forty-one subjects were enrolled and 12-week data were available for 37 subjects (20 PFPT, 17 no PFPT). Mean age and BMI were 31 ± 13 years and 24.9 (± 4.0) kg/m2. Subjects were on hormone therapy for a median of 39 (20-240) months and 5 (13.5%) patients had undergone previous orchiectomy. At 12 weeks, the median vaginal length was 12.5 (10-16) cm, reported mean ease of dilation was 7.3 (± 1.6), and pain with dilation was 2.4 (± 1.7). There were no differences in these outcomes or in pelvic floor symptoms between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, routine postoperative PFPT did not improve outcomes in patients undergoing vaginoplasty.

Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes.

Devices such as inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) can be used to achieve erectile rigidity after phalloplasty in assigned female at birth (AFAB) individuals. The approach to inserting an IPP in a neophallus is different and more challenging compared to that of an anatomical penis due to the absence of anatomical structures such as the corpora cavernosa, and the more tenuous blood supply of the neophallus and reconstructed urethra. In addition, the ideal surgical techniques and devices for use in the neophallus have not been defined. This review systematically summarises the literature on the insertion of IPP in the neophallus of individuals AFAB. In particular, the described techniques, types of devices used and peri-operative and patient-reported outcomes are emphasised. An initial search of the PubMed database was performed on 16 September 2022 and an updated search was performed on 26 May 2023. Overall, 185 articles were screened for eligibility and 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Two studies reported outcomes on the zephyr surgical implant 475 FTM device and the others reported outcomes on the Boston Scientific AMS 600/700TM CX 3-piece inflatable, AMS AmbicorTM 2-piece inflatable, Coloplast Titan® or Dynaflex devices. Overall, 1106 IPPs were analysed. The infection rate was 4.2%-50%, with most studies reporting an infection rate of <30%. Mechanical failure or dysfunction occurred in 1.4%-36.4%, explantation was required in 3.3%-41.6%, and implant revision or replacement was performed in 6%-70%. Overall, 51.4%-90.6% of patients were satisfied and 77%-100% were engaging in sexual intercourse. An IPP in a neophallus is an acceptable option to achieve rigidity for sexual intercourse. However, this challenging procedure has good reports of patient and partner satisfaction despite significant risks of complications.