ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and versatility of reopening procedures for the permanent occlusion of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube (POET) by analyzing four consecutive cases. METHODS: The study included all patients diagnosed with POET who suffered from Eustachian tube occlusion and glue ear. A combined approach of endoscopic transnasal/transoral laser surgery was utilized to reopen the POET. This was subsequently followed by balloon dilation (BET) and stenting for a duration of six weeks. In one distinct case, the Eustachian tube orifice was approached via a transtympanic method, where a balloon catheter was placed. The primary outcome measures targeted the success rate of reopening, which was quantified using audiological outcomes and Eustachian tube patency verified by a positive Valsalva maneuver. RESULTS: Four patients, with an age range of 14-62 years (mean age of 29.3 years), were subject to Eustachian tube reopening. The duration of follow-up varied between 10 and 24 months, averaging at 16.2 months. Notably, 75% of the surgically treated ears displayed no evidence of glue ear upon their last follow-up and showed restoration of Eustachian tube patency. The procedures were executed without any surgical complications. The causes for POET in these patients were heterogeneous: two were attributed to scarring post adenoidectomy, one to occlusion following orthognathic surgery and the remaining one due to prior radiotherapy treatment for squamous cell carcinoma located at the soft palate. DISCUSSION: Total occlusion of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube may be linked to persistent middle ear diseases. It is imperative to conduct nasopharyngeal endoscopy in these cases. The findings from this study suggest that the Eustachian tube reopening procedure is predominantly effective and safe for patients with POET stemming from a variety of pathologies. Future research should focus on exploring advanced stenting devices and necessitate longer follow-up periods for comprehensive understanding.
Subject(s)
Ear Diseases , Eustachian Tube , Laser Therapy , Otitis Media , Humans , Adult , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Eustachian Tube/surgery , Eustachian Tube/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Ear Diseases/surgery , Otitis Media/surgery , Laser Therapy/methods , Dilatation/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The association between the indoor environment and lifetime prevalence of otitis media (OM) in Australian children was assessed. We analysed data from a cross-sectional study of children, aged 7-11 years, performed in twelve Australian cities during 2007-2008. The main outcome was a parental report of their child's diagnosis with OM by a doctor. Information on the indoor environment (energy sources used for heating, cooling, and cooking, pets, and second-hand smoke exposure), in the first year of life and at present, was collected from parents by a questionnaire. Multi-level logistic regression models were used to adjust for individual- and area-level confounders. Our analysis comprised 2872 children (51% female, mean age: 10.0 (SD 1.2)). Of those, 1097 (39%) were reported to have OM. Exposure to gas heating in the first year of life was significantly associated with higher odds of OM in adjusted models (OR:1.22; 95% CI: 1.00,1.47), as was current exposure to reverse-cycle air conditioning (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.27,1.82). Ownership of a cat or dog at any time was also associated with high odds of OM (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.17,1.92). No other significant associations were observed. In this national study of Australian children, indoor environmental exposures associated with the lifetime prevalence of OM were gas heating, reverse-cycle air conditioning and pet ownership. Exposures in both early life and later childhood may both play a role in OM.
Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , Otitis Media , Australia/epidemiology , Child , Cooking , Cross-Sectional Studies , Environmental Exposure , Female , Humans , Male , Otitis Media/epidemiology , Otitis Media/etiologyABSTRACT
DESIGN: The objective of this study was to establish whether autoinflation was an effective intervention in a paediatric audiology service. This was a pragmatic retrospective study with historical controls using a paired availability design. SETTING: The study took place at a single paediatric audiology service in England. PARTICIPANTS: All children seen in the clinic over a two-year period who were aged between 3 and 11 years and who had a type B tympanogram in at least one ear were included. The Otovent autoinflation device was available as a treatment option over the second year (Cohort B) but not the first (Cohort A). There were 976 children included in the study: Cohort A comprised 513 children, Cohort B comprised 463 children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The aims were to evaluate whether there was improvement in hearing thresholds following introduction of an autoinflation device, and whether there was a reduction in further audiology follow-ups, and in referrals to an ear, nose and throat specialist for consideration of ventilation tube insertion. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant improvement in hearing thresholds in Cohort B compared to Cohort A, however the improvements were clinically minimal with small effect sizes. There was no significant difference in improvement of tympanometry results between the two cohorts. Significantly more children in Cohort B (autoinflation group) were referred to an ear, nose and throat specialist after their second appointment compared to Cohort A. It was feasible to introduce autoinflation into the care pathway, however there was no evidence of clinically meaningful improved outcomes for patients.
Subject(s)
Hearing , Insufflation/methods , Otitis Media with Effusion/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Nasal Cavity , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The recommended management for children with otitis media with effusion (OME) is 'watchful waiting' before considering grommet surgery. During this time speech and language, listening skills, quality of life, social skills, and outcomes of education can be jeopardized. Air-conduction (AC) hearing aids are problematic due to fluctuating AC hearing loss. Bone-conduction (BC) hearing is stable, but BC hearing aids can be uncomfortable. Both types of hearing aids are costly. Given the high prevalence of OME and the transitory nature of the accompanying hearing loss, cost-effective solutions are needed. The leisure industry has developed relatively inexpensive, comfortable, high-quality BC headsets for transmission of speech or music. This study assessed whether these headsets, paired with a remote microphone, improve speech discrimination for children with OME. Nineteen children aged 3 to 6 years receiving recommended management in the United Kingdom for children with OME participated. Word-discrimination thresholds were measured in a sound-treated room in quiet and with 65 dB(A) speech-shaped noise, with and without a headset. The median threshold in quiet (N = 17) was 39 dB(A) (range: 23-59) without a headset and 23 dB(A) (range: 9-35) with a headset (Z = -3.519, p < .001). The median threshold in noise (N = 19) was 59 dB(A) (range: 50-63) without a headset and 45 dB(A) (range: 32-50) with a headset (Z = -3.825, p < .001). Thus, the use of a BC headset paired with a remote microphone significantly improved speech discrimination in quiet and in noise for children with OME.
Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Hearing Aids/standards , Hearing Loss, Conductive/therapy , Otitis Media with Effusion/therapy , Speech Perception , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hearing Aids/economics , Humans , Language , Male , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , United KingdomABSTRACT
Objective Clinical symptoms of otitis media with effusion are rarely brought forward to the guardians of young children who the disease is most prevalent in. This often leads to poor scholastic performances and difficult social interactions. The objective of this study was to identify asymptomatic cases of otitis media with effusion present in individuals with adenoid hypertrophy. Material and Methods In a cross sectional study advocated in Justice K.S.Hegde Hospital, Karnataka India we evaluated one hundred patients above the age of three from August 2016 to December 2017. Candidates who presented with an adenoid nasopharyngeal ratio of more than 0.5 were selected for the study. Individuals who complained of otological symptoms were not considered for the study. Patients cleared of other pathological otological conditions were underwent audiological evaluation with pure tone audiometry and tympanometry for evaluating the middle ear status and hearing loss. Results The study showed a total of 36% of patients evaluated presented with asymptomatic otitis media with effusion. In candidates who presented with a bilateral B tympanogram, 40% had significant conductive hearing loss of more than 25dB. Conclusion An objective test such as impedance audiometry in all patients with adenoid hypertrophy would aid in the diagnosis of fluid in the middle ear, so that timely intervention can be done and possible complications be averted.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nasal balloon autoinflation is an effective, non-surgical treatment for symptomatic children with glue ear, although uptake is variable and evidence about acceptability and feasibility is limited. AIM: To explore parent and healthcare professional views and experiences of nasal balloon autoinflation for children with glue ear in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with a maximum-variety sample of parents, GPs, and practice nurses. The study took place between February 2013 and September 2014. METHOD: Semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: In all, 14 parents, 31 GPs, and 19 nurses were included in the study. Parents described the nasal balloon as a natural, holistic treatment that was both acceptable and appealing to children. GPs and nurses perceived the method to be a low-cost, low-risk strategy, applicable to the primary care setting. Good instruction and demonstration ensured children mastered the technique and engaged with the treatment, but uncertainties were raised about training provision and potential impact on the GP consultation. Making nasal balloon autoinflation part of a child's daily routine enhances compliance, but difficulties can arise if children are unwell or refuse to cooperate. CONCLUSION: Nasal balloon autoinflation is an acceptable, low-cost treatment option for children with glue ear in primary care. Provision of educational materials and demonstration of the method are likely to promote uptake and compliance. Wider use of the nasal balloon has the potential to enhance early management, and may help to fill the management gap arising from forthcoming changes to care pathways.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , General Practitioners , Nurses , Otitis Media with Effusion/therapy , Parents , Primary Health Care , Attitude to Health , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Myringotomy for tube insertion is the most common otologic surgery. Otorrhea is a frequent complication of this procedure and, to prevent it, most surgeons strongly recommend avoiding contact with water as this is thought to adversely impact on post-operative quality of life. Objective To understand the benefit of this recommendation. Methods Observational study - retrospective cohort study comparing the incidence of post-operative otorrhea and its impact on patients' quality of life, in two groups of patients comprising children under 10 years of age who underwent bilateral myringotomy and tube placement for chronic otitis media with effusion between May 2011 and May 2012. One group received water protection care after surgery, the other did not. Data was collected through telephonic interview, after one year of follow up (one year after the procedure). Water exposure without protection was considered the exposure event. Incidence of otorrhea and perceived impact on quality of life were the outcome measures. Results were compared after logistic regression. Results We included 143 children: 116 were not exposed to water without protection and 27 were exposed. In the not exposed group 36.2% had at least one episode of otorrhea, compared to 40.0% of the exposed group. Odds ratio for otorrhea on exposed was 1.21 (95% CI 0.51-2.85, p = 0.6). Negative impact on quality of life was reported by parents of 48.2% on the not exposed children, compared to 40.7% on the exposed group. This difference was not significant (p = 0.5). Conclusion We found that recommending water protection did not have beneficial effect on the incidence of otorrhea after myringotomy with tubes on chronic otitis media with effusion. However, such measures did not appear to have a negative impact on quality of life. This is a populational observational study with few cases (143 cases); these final statements would be better stated by a very large populational study with another large control group.
Resumo Introdução A miringotomia para inserção de tubo de ventilação é a cirurgia otológica mais comum. Otorreia é uma complicação frequente deste procedimento e, para evita-la, a maioria dos cirurgiões recomenda evitar o contato com a água, pois acredita-se que isso possa afetar negativamente a qualidade de vida pós-operatória. Objetivo Verificar o benefício dessa recomendação. Método Estudo observacional - estudo de coorte retrospectivo, comparando a incidência de otorreia pós-operatória e seu impacto na qualidade de vida dos pacientes, em dois grupos de pacientes com crianças menores de 10 anos submetidas à miringotomia bilateral e colocação de tubo de ventilação para o tratamento de otite média crônica com efusão, entre maio de 2011 e maio de 2012. Um grupo recebeu cuidados de proteção contra a água após a cirurgia, o outro não. Os dados foram coletados através de entrevista telefônica, após um ano de seguimento (um ano após o procedimento). A exposição à água sem proteção foi considerada o evento de exposição. A incidência de otorreia e o impacto percebido na qualidade de vida foram as medidas de resultado. Os resultados foram comparados após a regressão logística. Resultados Incluímos 143 crianças: 116 não foram expostas à água sem proteção e 27 foram expostas. No grupo não exposto, 36,2% apresentaram pelo menos um episódio de otorreia, em comparação com 40,0% do grupo exposto. A razão de chances (odds ratio) para otorreia no grupo exposto foi de 1,21 (IC 95%: 0,51-2,85, p = 0,6). O impacto negativo na qualidade de vida foi relatado pelos pais de 48,2% nas crianças não expostas, em comparação com 40,7% no grupo exposto. Essa diferença não foi significante (p = 0,5). Conclusão Não verificamos um efeito benéfico sobre a incidência de otorreia ao recomendar a proteção contra a água após colocação de tubos de ventilação para otite média com efusão. Entretanto, tais medidas não parecem ter tido um impacto negativo na qualidade de vida.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Otitis Media, Suppurative/etiology , Otitis Media, Suppurative/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Otitis Media with Effusion/surgery , Water , Middle Ear Ventilation/adverse effects , Otitis Media, Suppurative/epidemiology , Portugal/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Logistic Models , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ear, Middle/metabolism , Secondary PreventionABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Myringotomy for tube insertion is the most common otologic surgery. Otorrhea is a frequent complication of this procedure and, to prevent it, most surgeons strongly recommend avoiding contact with water as this is thought to adversely impact on post-operative quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To understand the benefit of this recommendation. METHODS: Observational study - retrospective cohort study comparing the incidence of post-operative otorrhea and its impact on patients' quality of life, in two groups of patients comprising children under 10 years of age who underwent bilateral myringotomy and tube placement for chronic otitis media with effusion between May 2011 and May 2012. One group received water protection care after surgery, the other did not. Data was collected through telephonic interview, after one year of follow up (one year after the procedure). Water exposure without protection was considered the exposure event. Incidence of otorrhea and perceived impact on quality of life were the outcome measures. Results were compared after logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 143 children: 116 were not exposed to water without protection and 27 were exposed. In the not exposed group 36.2% had at least one episode of otorrhea, compared to 40.0% of the exposed group. Odds ratio for otorrhea on exposed was 1.21 (95% CI 0.51-2.85, p=0.6). Negative impact on quality of life was reported by parents of 48.2% on the not exposed children, compared to 40.7% on the exposed group. This difference was not significant (p=0.5). CONCLUSION: We found that recommending water protection did not have beneficial effect on the incidence of otorrhea after myringotomy with tubes on chronic otitis media with effusion. However, such measures did not appear to have a negative impact on quality of life. This is a populational observational study with few cases (143 cases); these final statements would be better stated by a very large populational study with another large control group.
Subject(s)
Middle Ear Ventilation/adverse effects , Otitis Media with Effusion/surgery , Otitis Media, Suppurative/etiology , Otitis Media, Suppurative/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Water , Child , Child, Preschool , Ear, Middle/metabolism , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Otitis Media, Suppurative/epidemiology , Portugal/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Secondary Prevention , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: ENT surgeons may refer children with otitis media with effusion (OME) to audiology for consideration of hearing aids. They are an option for the treatment of OME, but are only effective if the child actually wears them. Our study investigated what proportion of children referred for hearing aids actually receive them, and whether children use them. METHOD: Retrospective study of children referred to audiology from November 2013 to August 2014, including 70 children referred by ENT for hearing aids for OME, plus a further 5 children with OME given hearing aids through direct access audiology service. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 202 referrals of children to audiology, of which 70 (34.7%) were for consideration of hearing aids for OME. Of these 70 referred children, 37 (52.9%) were not fitted with hearing aids due to normal audiometry (23), asymptomatic mild hearing loss (7), nonattendance (3), clinical decision to just monitor hearing (1), parental decline (2), and unrecorded reason (1). A total of 38 children (including direct access patients) were fitted with hearing aids for OME. Majority (36/38) of children issued aids used them, 16 all day, 7 only at school, 1 only at home, 3 only when needed, and 9 used them for an unspecified duration; 1 child's use of hearing aids was unrecorded, and 1 child refused to use it. 21 were fitted bilaterally and 17 unilaterally. 37 were behind the ear aids and 1 a BAHA softband. CONCLUSIONS: A third of referrals to paediatric audiology by ENT are for consideration of hearing aids for OME. Only about half of children referred to audiology for hearing aids for OME actually receive them, as by the time they see audiology the hearing loss has frequently resolved or is asymptomatic so that aiding is unwarranted. Once fitted, they appear to be well accepted. Hearing aids have fair utilization in children fitted with them for OME.
Subject(s)
Hearing Aids/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/therapy , Otitis Media with Effusion/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Otitis Media with Effusion/complications , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a common cause of hearing loss and possible developmental delay in children, and there are a range of 'preference sensitive' treatment options. We aimed to evaluate the attitudes and beliefs of parents of affected children to treatment options including watchful-waiting, hearing aids, grommets, and, oral steroids with the intention of developing our understanding of decision-making and the factors influencing it, sources of parental information, and satisfaction with information provision. DESIGN: We recruited a convenience sample of twelve parents of eleven children with OME at a single ENT department of a teaching hospital into a qualitative research study. The children of the parents interviewed had already been recruited into the Oral Steroids for the Resolution of Otitis Media with effusion In Children (OSTRICH) study. Semi structured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and then coded using an inductive, thematic approach. RESULTS: Parents were satisfied with the verbal provision of information during the treatment consultation, although many were keen to receive supplementary printed information. Discussion with family and friends helped the decision-making process, whereas insufficient information and a paternalistic approach were viewed as obstacles. Parents were particularly influenced by the following: the immediacy of the treatment option effect, perceived efficacy, perceived risks and adverse effects, social implications (especially with hearing aids) and past personal and informant experience. CONCLUSIONS: Parents appreciate clinicians tailoring information provision to parents' information needs and preferred format. Clinicians should also elicit parental attitudes towards the different management options for OME and the factors influencing their decisions, in order to optimise shared-decision making and ultimately provide a better standard of clinical care.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Attitude to Health , Decision Making , Hearing Aids , Middle Ear Ventilation , Otitis Media with Effusion/therapy , Parents , Patient Education as Topic , Child , Child, Preschool , Deafness/etiology , Female , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Male , Otitis Media with Effusion/complications , Perception , Qualitative Research , Watchful WaitingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This paper objectively evaluates current information available to the general public related to glue ear on the World Wide Web. METHODS: The term 'glue ear' was typed into the 3 most frequently used internet search engines - Google, Bing and Yahoo - and the first 20 links were analysed. The first 400 words of each page were used to calculate the Flesch-Kincaid readability score. Each website was subsequently graded using the Discern instrument, which gauges quality and content of literature. RESULTS: The websites Webmd.boots.com, Bupa.co.uk and Patient.co.uk received the highest overall scores. These reflected top scores in either readability or Discern instrument assessment, but not both. Readability and Discern scores increased with the presence of a marketing or advertising incentive. The Patient.co.uk website had the highest Discern score and third highest readability score. CONCLUSION: There is huge variation in the quality of information available to patients on the internet. Some websites may be accessible to a wide range of reading ages but have poor quality content, and vice versa. Clinicians should be aware of indicators of quality, and use validated instruments to assess and recommend literature.
Subject(s)
Consumer Health Information , Internet , Otitis Media with Effusion , Data Accuracy , Humans , Otitis Media with Effusion/diagnosis , Otitis Media with Effusion/etiology , Otitis Media with Effusion/therapy , Search EngineABSTRACT
AIM: To describe the prevalence and risk factors of recurrent otitis media (rOM) in an urban Australian population at 3 years of age. METHODS: Cross-sectional examination of prevalence and risk factors of rOM in 2280 participants from the Raine Study enrolled from public and private hospitals in Perth, Western Australia, between 1989 and 1991. Parental report questionnaires at 3 years of age were used for rOM identification, with secondary confirmation by otoscopic examination at 1, 2 or 3 years of age. RESULTS: The prevalence of parent-reported rOM was 26.8% (611/2280) and 5.5% (125/2280) for severe rOM in the Study. Independent associations were found between rOM and the presence of older siblings, attendance at day care and the introduction of other milk products at ≤4 months of age. Independent associations for severe rOM were the presence of allergies and attendance at day care. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence rates of rOM within the Raine Study children are similar to a number of other known cohorts. Parity, presence of allergies, attendance at day care and introduction of other milk products at ≤4 months are highlighted as specific risk factors for rOM in this population and presence of allergies and attendance at day care being risk factors for severe rOM. Diagnosis of rOM by parent report and the delay between data collection and reporting are limitations of this study. However, as there is very limited data on OM in urban, non-Indigenous Australian children, this study improves our understanding of OM for this group.
Subject(s)
Otitis Media/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Otitis Media/diagnosis , Otitis Media/etiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Western Australia/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Introducción: La otitis media con efusión (OME) sigue siendo la patología otológica más prevalente en los preescolares de Chile; su etiología y factores predisponentes aún no están del todo claro; por ende su tratamiento es controversial. Objetivo: Demostrar una correlación microbiológica en cultivos de tejido adenoídeo y glue de ambos oídos en pacientes con OME. Material y método: Estudio prospectivo caso/control, donde se analizaron los cultivos bacterianos de tejido adenoideo y glue de ambos oídos en 40 pacientes con OME y cultivos bacterianos de tejido adenoídeo de 40 pacientes con hiperplasia adenoídea sin OME. Resultados: Casos: Cinco cultivos negativos de adenoides (12,5%), 28 positivos a comensales (70%) y 7 positivos a gérmenes no habituales (17,5%). El glue presentó cultivo negativo en 72,5% OD y 77,5% OI. Los cultivos de adenoides en los controles no difieren mayormente a los casos. Discusión: No se pudo establecer una correlación microbiológica entre glue y adenoides en pacientes con OME. Conclusiones: El número de cultivos de glue negativos se correlaciona con la literatura mundial. No existe un patrón que permita correlacionar los cultivos de adenoides de los casos con los cultivos de glue, ni con los cultivos de adenoides de los controles.
Introduction: Otitis Media with Effusion is still the most prevalent otological pathology in preschool children in Chile. Its etiology and predisposing factors are not entirely clear yet. Hence, its treatment is controversial. Aim: To demonstrate a microbiological correlation in adenoid tissue and glue ear cultures in both ears in patients with OME. Material and method: Prospective case control study, which analyzed bacterial adenoid tissue cultures and glue ear cultures in both ears in 40 patients with OME, and a second control group of bacterial cultures in 40 patients with adenoid hyperplasia without ear effusion. Results: Cases: Five negatives in adenoid cultures (12.5%), 28 positive to guest bacteria (70%) and 7 positive at unusual germs (17.5%). The glue ear presented negative culture at 72.5% in the right ear and 77.5% in the left ear. Adenoid control cultures did not differ with OME studied cases. Discussion: A microbiological glue ear and adenoid correlation could not be established. Conclusions: The number of negative glue ear cultures is similar to published literature. There is not a pattern which allows a positive correlation between adenoid cases cultures and glue ear cultures or with control adenoid cultures.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Otitis Media with Effusion/microbiology , Adenoids/microbiology , Ear, Middle/microbiology , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Otitis Media with Effusion/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Chile/epidemiology , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
The present study was carried out to find out prevalence of secretory otitis media in 200 school going children between the age group of 5-7 years by impedance audiometry besides clinical evaluation. 100 children were taken from two different schools catering to higher and lower socioeconomic strata of society. The overall prevalence of secretory otitis media came out to be 20.75%. It was 28.5% in lower socioeconomic group and, 13% in the other group. This high prevalence warrants routine screening for secretory otitis media. Further impedance audiometry was found to be very good method of screening secretory otitis media.
ABSTRACT
Middle Ear Effusion (O.M.E.) is the commonest ear problem among children, with a peak at the age of 2 years. Incidence varies according to geographical location and race variation, environmental and socio-economic factors. The disease is characterized by accumulation of semi-sterile secretion in the middle ear. It is usually due to either a dysfunction of Eustachian tube or of the mucociliary system or both. The most common presenting symptoms are mild to moderate conductive hearing loss, attacks of earache, and deterioration in school. The diagnosis is based on history, clinical findings and hearing assessments. In general, treatment is classified as conservative and surgical. Early screening and health education are the recent concepts advocated, for early detection.