Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Endocrine ; 84(3): 1135-1145, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244121

ABSTRACT

Though the Greulich and Pyle (GP) method is easy, inter-observer variability, differential maturation of hand bones influences ratings. The Tanner-Whitehouse (TW) method is more accurate, but cumbersome. A simpler method combining the above, such that it utilizes fewer bones without affecting accuracy, would be widely used and more applicable in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: 1. Devising a simplified method utilizing three bones of the hand and wrist for bone age (BA) assessment. 2. Testing whether the 3 bone method gives comparable results to standard methods (GP,TW2,TW3) in Indian children. METHODS: Developmental stages and corresponding BA for radius, hamate, terminal phalanx (left middle finger) epiphyses combining stages from GP,TW3 atlases were described; BA were rated by two blinded observers. 3 bone method ratings were compared with the same dataset analyzed earlier using GP,TW2,TW3 (4 raters). RESULTS: Radiographs analysed:493 (Girls=226). Mean chronological age:9.4 ± 4.6 yrs, mean BA 3 bone:9.8 ± 4.8 yrs, GP:9.6 ± 4.8 yrs, TW3:9.3 ± 4.5 yrs, TW2:9.9 ± 5.0 yrs. The 3 bone method demonstrated no significant inter-observer variability (p = 0.3, mean difference = 0.02 ± 0.6 yrs); a strong positive correlation (p < 0.0001) with GP (r = 0.985), TW3 (r = 0.983) and TW2 (r = 0.982) was noted. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated good agreement; the root mean square errors between 3 bone and GP,TW3,TW2 ratings were 0.6,0.7,0.6 years; mean differences were 0.19,0.49,-0.14 years respectively. Greatest proportion of outliers (beyond ±1.96 SD of mean difference) was between 6 and 8 years age for difference in 3 bone and GP, and between 4-6 years for difference in 3 bone and TW3,TW2. CONCLUSION: The 3 bone method has multiple advantages; it is easier, tackles differential maturation of wrist and hand bones, has good reproducibility, without compromising on accuracy rendering it suitable for office practice.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton , Hand Bones , Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Humans , Female , Child , Male , Hand Bones/diagnostic imaging , Hand Bones/growth & development , Hand Bones/anatomy & histology , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Radius/diagnostic imaging , Radius/anatomy & histology , Observer Variation , Finger Phalanges/diagnostic imaging , Finger Phalanges/anatomy & histology , Reproducibility of Results , Wrist/diagnostic imaging , Wrist/anatomy & histology , Bone Development/physiology
2.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab ; 36(12): 1181-1185, 2023 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37844258

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Greulich-Pyle (GP) is one of the most used method for bone age determination (BAD) in various orthopedic, pediatric, radiological, and forensic situations. We aimed to investigate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the GP method between the most relevant disciplines and its applicability to the Turkish population. METHODS: One-hundred and eighty (90 boys, 90 girls) patients with a chronological age younger than 18 (mean 9.33) were included. X-rays mixed by the blinded investigator were evaluated by two orthopedists, two radiologists, and two pediatric endocrinologists to determine skeletal age according to the GP atlas. A month later the process was repeated. As a statistical method, Paired t-test was used for comparison, an Intraclass Correlation Coefficients test was used for reliability and a 95 % confidence interval was determined. Results were classified according to Landis-Koch. RESULTS: All results were consistent with chronological age (p<0.001), according to the investigators' evaluations compared with chronological age. At the initial evaluation, the interobserver reliability of the method was 0.999 (excellent); at the second evaluation, the interobserver reliability was 0.997 (excellent). The intra-observer reliability of the method was 'excellent' in all observers. When results were separately evaluated by gender, excellent intraobserver correlation and excellent correlation with chronological age were found among all researchers (>0.9). When X-rays were divided into three groups based on age ranges and evaluated, 'moderate' and 'good' correlations with chronological age were obtained during the peripubertal period. CONCLUSIONS: The GP method used in skeletal age determination has excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability. During the peripubertal period, potential discrepancies in bone age assessments should be kept in mind. This method can be used safely and reproducibly by the relevant specialists.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton , Bone and Bones , Male , Female , Humans , Child , Reproducibility of Results , Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Radiography
3.
Front Pediatr ; 11: 1137960, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37397141

ABSTRACT

Background: The Greulich and Pyle's Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist (GP Atlas) is the most widely used method of determining the bone age (BA) of a child. It is also a widely accepted method for forensic age determination. As there is limited local bone age data for forensic age estimation, the purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GP Atlas for forensic age determination in living Sabahan children. Method: This study recruited 182 children between the ages of 9 years to 18 years. BA estimation of the left-hand anteroposterior radiographs were performed by two experienced radiologists using the Greulich-Pyle method. Results: The BA estimates from two radiologists had very high interobserver reliability (ICC 0.937) and a strong positive interobserver correlation (r > 0.90). The GP method, significantly and consistently underestimated chronological age (CA) by 0.7, 0.6 and 0.7 years in overall children, boys and girls respectively with minimal errors. Mean absolute error and root of mean squared error for overall children was 1.5 and 2.2 years respectively, while mean absolute percentage error was 11.6%. This underestimation was consistent across all age groups but was statistically significant only at 13-13.9 and 17-18.9 years old age groups. Conclusion: Despite high interobserver reliability of BA estimation using the GP Atlas, this method consistently underestimates the age of the child in all children to a significant degree, for both boys and girls across all age groups, with an acceptably low level of error metrics. Our findings suggest that locally validated GP Atlas or other type of assessments (artificial intelligence or machine learning) are needed for assessment of BA to accurately predict CA, since current GP Atlas standards significantly underestimated chronological age with minimal error for children in Sabah. A larger population-based study would be necessary for establishing a validated atlas of a bone age in Malaysia.

4.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 14: 1130580, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37033216

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Automated bone age assessment has recently become increasingly popular. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between automated and manual evaluation of bone age using the method according to Tanner-Whitehouse (TW3) and Greulich-Pyle (GP). Methods: We evaluated 1285 bone age scans from 1202 children (657 scans from 612 boys) by using both manual and automated (TW3 as well as GP) bone age assessment. BoneXpert software versions 2.4.5.1. (BX2) and 3.2.1. (BX3) (Visiana, Holte, Denmark) were compared with manual evaluation using root mean squared error (RMSE) analysis. Results: RMSE for BX2 was 0.57 and 0.55 years in boys and 0.72 and 0.59 years in girls, respectively for TW3 and GP. For BX3, RMSE was 0.51 and 0.68 years in boys and 0.49 and 0.52 years in girls, respectively for TW3 and GP. Sex- and age-specific analysis for BX2 identified the largest differences between manual and automated TW3 evaluation in girls between 6-7, 12-13, 13-14 and 14-15 years, with RMSE 0.88, 0.81, 0.92 and 0.84 years, respectively. The BX3 version showed better agreement with manual TW3 evaluation (RMSE 0.64, 0.45, 0.46 and 0.57). Conclusion: The latest version of the BoneXpert software provides improved and clinically sufficient agreement with manual bone age evaluation in children of both sexes compared to the previous version and may be used for routine bone age evaluation in non-selected cases in pediatric endocrinology care.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton , Software , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , White People
5.
Ann Hum Biol ; 50(1): 1-7, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36724737

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Maturation of bones in the hand-wrist region varies among individuals of the same age and among world groups. Although some studies from Africa report differences to other ethnic groups, the lack of detailed bone-specific maturity data prevents meaningful comparisons. AIM: The aim of this study was to describe bone-specific maturity for developing hand-wrist bones in individuals in Khartoum, Sudan. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The sample was selected from healthy patients attending a dental hospital in Khartoum with known age and ancestry (males = 280, females = 330; aged between 3 and 25 years). Bones were assessed from radiographs of the left hand and wrist after the Greulich and Pyle Atlas (1959). Median ages of attainment for bone stages were calculated using probit analysis for each stage in males and females separately. RESULTS: Maturity data for stages of the phalanges, metacarpals, carpals and radius and ulna in males and females are presented. Median ages in females were earlier compared to males for all stages. These results are largely earlier than previously published findings or where these could be calculated. CONCLUSION: These results of individual maturity stages of phalanges, metacarpals, carpals and the distal epiphyses of the radius and ulna are useful to assess maturity in growing individuals from Sudan.


Subject(s)
Hand Bones , Wrist , Male , Female , Humans , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Wrist/diagnostic imaging , Sudan , Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Hand Bones/diagnostic imaging , Hand/diagnostic imaging
6.
Pediatr Radiol ; 53(6): 1108-1116, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36576515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The applicability and accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted bone age assessment and adult height prediction methods in girls with early puberty are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the performance of AI-assisted bone age assessment methods by comparing the corresponding methods for predicted adult height with actual adult height. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 726 girls with early puberty, 87 of whom had reached adult height at last follow-up. Bone age was evaluated using the Greulich-Pyle (GP), Tanner-Whitehouse (TW3-RUS) and China 05 RUS-CHN (RUS-CHN) methods. Predicted adult height was calculated using the China 05 (CH05), TW3 and Bayley-Pinneau (BP) methods. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,663 left-hand radiographs, including 155 from girls who had reached adult height. In the 6-8- and 9-11-years age groups, bone age differences were smaller than those in the 12-14-years group; however, the differences between predicted adult height and actual adult height were larger than those in the 12-14-years group. TW3 overestimated adult height by 0.4±2.8 cm, while CH05 and BP significantly underestimated adult height by 2.9±3.6 cm and 1.3±3.8 cm, respectively. TW3 yielded the highest proportion of predicted adult height within ±5 cm of actual adult height (92.9%), with the highest correlation between predicted and actual adult heights. CONCLUSION: The differences in measured bone ages increased with increasing bone age. However, the corresponding method for predicting adult height was more accurate when the bone age was older. TW3 might be more suitable than CH05 and BP for predicting adult height in girls with early puberty. Methods for predicting adult height should be optimized for populations of the same ethnicity and disease.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton , Artificial Intelligence , Body Height , East Asian People , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Puberty , Puberty, Precocious , Retrospective Studies
7.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 976565, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36052363

ABSTRACT

Background: Bone age assessment (BAA) is an essential tool utilized in outpatient pediatric clinics. Three major BAA methods, Greulich-Pyle (GP), Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW3), and China 05 RUS-CHN (RUS-CHN), were applied to comprehensively compare bone age (BA) and chronological age (CA) in a Chinese sample of preschool children. This study was designed to determine the most reliable method. Methods: The BAA sample consisted of 207 females and 183 males aged 3-6 years from the Zhejiang Province in China. The radiographs were estimated according to the GP, TW3, and RUS-CHN methods by two pediatric radiologists. The data was analyzed statistically using boxplots, the Wilcoxon rank test, and Student's t-test to explore the difference (D) between BA and CA. Results: According to the distributions of D, the boxplots showed that the median D of the TW3 method was close to zero for both male and female subjects. The TW3 and RUS-CHN methods overestimated the age of both genders. The TW3 method had the highest correct classification rate for males but a similar rate for females. The GP method did not show any significant difference between the BA and CA when applied to 3-year-old males and 4-year-old females while the TW3 method showed similar results when applied to 6-year-old females. The RUS-CHN method showed the least consistent results among the three methods. Conclusion: The TW3 method was superior to the GP and RUS-CHN methods but not reliable on its own. It should be noted that a precise age diagnosis for preschool children cannot be easily made if only one of the methods is utilized. Therefore, it is advantageous to combine multiple methods when assessing bone age.

8.
Indian J Pediatr ; 89(7): 692-698, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103904

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To validate adult height predictions (BX) using automated and Greulich-Pyle bone age determinations in children with chronic endocrine diseases. METHODS: Heights and near-adult heights were measured in 82 patients (48 females) with chronic endocrinopathies at the age of 10.45 ± 2.12 y and at time of transition to adult care (17.98 ± 3.02 y). Further, bone age (BA) was assessed using the conventional Greulich-Pyle (GP) method by three experts, and by BoneXpert™. PAH were calculated using conventional BP tables and BoneXpert™. RESULTS: The conventional and the automated BA determinations revealed a mean difference of 0.25 ± 0.72 y (p = 0.0027). The automated PAH by BoneXpert™ were 156.26 ± 0.86 cm (SDS - 2.01 ± 1.07) in females and 171.75 ± 1.6 cm (SDS - 1.29 ± 1.06) in males, compared to 153.95 ± 1.12 cm (SDS - 2.56 ± 1.5) in females and 169.31 ± 1.6 cm (SDS - 1.66 ± 1.56) in males by conventional BP, respectively and in comparison to near-adult heights 156.38 ± 5.84 cm (SDS - 1.91 ± 1.15) in females and 168.94 ± 8.18 cm (SDS - 1.72 ± 1.22) in males, respectively. CONCLUSION: BA ratings and adult height predictions by BoneXpert™ in children with chronic endocrinopathies abolish rater-dependent variability and enhance reproducibility of estimates thereby refining care in growth disorders. Conventional methods may outperform automated analyses in specific cases.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton , Body Height , Endocrine System Diseases , Growth Disorders , Adult , Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Child , Chronic Disease , Endocrine System Diseases/complications , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results
9.
Korean J Radiol ; 22(12): 2017-2025, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34668353

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and clinical efficacy of a hybrid Greulich-Pyle (GP) and modified Tanner-Whitehouse (TW) artificial intelligence (AI) model for bone age assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A deep learning-based model was trained on an open dataset of multiple ethnicities. A total of 102 hand radiographs (51 male and 51 female; mean age ± standard deviation = 10.95 ± 2.37 years) from a single institution were selected for external validation. Three human experts performed bone age assessments based on the GP atlas to develop a reference standard. Two study radiologists performed bone age assessments with and without AI model assistance in two separate sessions, for which the reading time was recorded. The performance of the AI software was assessed by comparing the mean absolute difference between the AI-calculated bone age and the reference standard. The reading time was compared between reading with and without AI using a paired t test. Furthermore, the reliability between the two study radiologists' bone age assessments was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and the results were compared between reading with and without AI. RESULTS: The bone ages assessed by the experts and the AI model were not significantly different (11.39 ± 2.74 years and 11.35 ± 2.76 years, respectively, p = 0.31). The mean absolute difference was 0.39 years (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.45 years) between the automated AI assessment and the reference standard. The mean reading time of the two study radiologists was reduced from 54.29 to 35.37 seconds with AI model assistance (p < 0.001). The ICC of the two study radiologists slightly increased with AI model assistance (from 0.945 to 0.990). CONCLUSION: The proposed AI model was accurate for assessing bone age. Furthermore, this model appeared to enhance the clinical efficacy by reducing the reading time and improving the inter-observer reliability.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Deep Learning , Adolescent , Age Determination by Skeleton , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results
10.
Cureus ; 12(10): e10880, 2020 Oct 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33178532

ABSTRACT

Background In forensic proficiency, the distinct model applied for age estimation includes physical examination, i.e., evaluation of somatic maturity and post pubescence peculiarities, dental development, and radiological assessment of skeletal maturity usually of the hand and wrist. The Greulich and Pyle (GP) method of skeletal age (SA) determination is considered quicker and easier with a lower error percentage of prediction. The specificity and applicability of the GP atlas have been recapitulated in many studies. This study aims to assess the applicability and reproducibility of the GP atlas on a sample of the eastern Utter Pradesh (UP) population. Results Considering the whole study population, the SA of the male subjects was retarded by 0.89 years or 9.03 months, whereas the SA of females were retarded by 0.36 years or 4.33 months than the chronological age, respectively. Conclusion According to this study, it is concluded that the GP atlas may not be applicable for both males and females in the eastern Uttar Pradesh region. The factors responsible for delayed skeletal growth and maturation may vary depending on demographics, ethnicity, and genetics. Further, a detailed study will be conclusive on a greater population size assessing more accurate and precise insights on the applicability and reproducibility of GP atlas.

11.
MethodsX ; 6: 1543-1546, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31309040

ABSTRACT

Although bone age plays a special role in determining the child's age, there are some variations in skeletal growth of different people. The aim of this study was to compare the bone age with chronological age of children aged 2-18 years old in order to recognize whether Greulich-Pyle (GP) method could be reliable for Iranian children? The standard radiograph of Left hand was taken in 40 healthy subjects, then the bone age was determined according to GP. Mean ±â€¯SD bone ages were delayed 1.12 ±â€¯0.65, 0.82 ±â€¯1.34 and 0.10 ±â€¯0.51 years than the mean chronological ages in 2.99-5.99, 10-13.99 and 14-17.99 age group, respectively; and advanced -0.33 ±â€¯3.12 years in the 6-9.99 age group. In BMI levels <18.5, 18.5-24.9, 25-29.9 and ≥30, Mean ±â€¯SD bone ages in males were delayed 2.25 ±â€¯0.21, 0.14 ±â€¯0.55, 0.87 ±â€¯0.41 and 4.05 ±â€¯0.70 years than the mean chronological ages, respectively. In BMI range of 18.5-24.9 and BMI ≥ 30, Mean ±â€¯SD bone age in females was delayed 0.50 ±â€¯0.49 and 0.45 ±â€¯0.63 years than the mean chronological ages, respectively. For BMI < 18.5, Mean ±â€¯SD bone age in females were advanced -0.40 ±â€¯2.69 years than mean chronological ages. Considering these differences, Iranian boys may have a different pattern of bone growth from GP standards.

12.
Pediatr Radiol ; 49(9): 1185-1191, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31152212

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone age determination is usually employed to evaluate growth disorders and their treatment. The Greulich-Pyle method is the simplest and most frequently used type of evaluation, but it presents huge interobserver variability. The BoneXpert is a computer-automated method developed to avoid significant bone age variability among distinct observers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the BoneXpert and Greulich-Pyle methods of bone age determination in eutrophic children and adolescents, as well as in overweight and obese pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 515 participants, 253 boys (159 eutrophic, 53 overweight and 41 obese) and 262 girls (146 eutrophic, 76 overweight and 40 obese). Left hand and wrist radiographs were acquired for bone age determination using both methods. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between chronological age and Greulich-Pyle, chronological age and BoneXpert, and Greulich-Pyle and BoneXpert. There was a significant increase (P<0.05) in bone age in both the Greulich-Pyle and BoneXpert methods in obese boys when compared to eutrophic or overweight boys of the same age. In girls, there was an increase in bone age in both obese and overweight individuals when compared to eutrophic girls (P<0.05). The Greulich-Pyle bone age was advanced in comparison to that of BoneXpert in all groups, except in obese boys, in which bone age was similarly advanced in both methods. CONCLUSION: The BoneXpert computer-automated bone age determination method showed a significant positive correlation with chronological age and Greulich-Pyle. Furthermore, the impact of being overweight or obese on bone age could be identified by both methods.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Obesity , Overweight , Thinness , Adolescent , Brazil , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hand/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Wrist/diagnostic imaging
13.
Forensic Sci Int ; 287: 218.e1-218.e8, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685770

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of three commonly used age estimation methods in Thailand: Greulich-Pyle, Tanner-Whitehouse and Fishman. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-five hand and wrist radiographs of 8-20 years old Thai patients were retrospectively collected. The radiographs were taken between 2011-2016. Greulich-Pyle, Tanner-Whitehouse 3 radius, ulna and selected short bones (RUS), and Fishman method were applied for each radiograph. Comparisons between the estimated age from each method and the chronological age were done using Wilcoxon signed ranks test with Bonferroni correction. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy tests were performed on the important legal age thresholds in Thailand (10, 13, 15 and 18years old). Intra- and inter-observer reliability were evaluated by weighted kappa analysis. RESULTS: The estimated ages from the three methods were significantly different from the chronological age, except for Tanner-Whitehouse 3 RUS in males. Regarding the legal age thresholds, Greulich-Pyle showed the best accuracy (83.2% for females and 79.63% for males) for legal age threshold of 10years old. Fishman method showed the best accuracy for legal age threshold of 13 (77.5% for females and 74.31% for males) and 15years old (83.08% for females and 73.77% for males). For age threshold of 18years old, Greulich-Pyle showed an accuracy of 53.85% for females and 54.44% for males. The reliability tests showed substantial to almost perfect agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no significant difference between Tanner-Whitehouse 3 RUS age and chronological age for male subjects of contemporary Thai children and adolescents. However, Greulich-Pyle and Fishman method were superior regarding the accuracy of prediction based on Thai legal age thresholds. Due to the possible effects from ethnical difference and secular changes, adaptation of age estimation methods specifically for contemporary Thai population should be further studied.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Asian People , Hand Bones/diagnostic imaging , Radius/diagnostic imaging , Ulna/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Child , Female , Forensic Anthropology , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Thailand , Young Adult
14.
Skeletal Radiol ; 47(7): 963-971, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29372277

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of hand MRI in age assessment in adolescents using the Greulich-Pyle (GP) atlas criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two radiologists, who were blinded to the study subjects' chronologic ages, semi-objectively evaluated 1.5-T MRIs of the left hands of ten patients (13.5 ± 2.6 years) who had left-hand radiographs and 50 healthy volunteers (15 ± 2 years). RESULTS: A coronal T1-weighted, volumetric, interpolated, breath-hold examination with water excitation (T1 VIBE-3D-WE) achieved the best image quality. The correlation between estimated patients' ages on radiographs and MRI was high. The average estimated age difference between the MRIs and radiographs was -0.05 years for reader 1 and -0.175 years for reader 2. The interclass coefficients (ICCs) showed high interobserver agreement (radiographs: ICC = 0.95, MRI: ICC = 0.97). The ICC, calculated separately for the male and female volunteers' estimated ages by MRI, also showed a high agreement between the two readers (male: ICC = 0.97, female: ICC = 0.95). Reader 1 estimated 94% of volunteers within 2 standard deviations (SD) and 62% within 1 SD. The results for reader 2 were 92% and 54%, respectively. Thirty-nine percent of girls and 27% of boys were estimated to be older using 1 SD. CONCLUSION: MRI of the left hand is a feasible alternative to hand radiographs for skeletal age estimation in adolescents using the GP criteria with 2 SD. Using 1 SD, the age of healthy volunteers tended to be estimated as higher than the chronologic age. Future studies should evaluate the results in a larger number of participants.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Atlases as Topic , Hand/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male
15.
Eur Radiol ; 27(3): 1032-1043, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27357132

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Greulich and Pyle (GP) atlas is one of the most frequently used methods of bone age (BA) estimation. Our aim is to assess its accuracy and to calculate the prediction intervals at 95% for forensic use. METHODS: The study was conducted on a multi-ethnic sample of 2614 individuals (1423 boys and 1191 girls) referred to the university hospital of Marseille (France) for simple injuries. Hand radiographs were analysed using the GP atlas. Reliability of GP atlas and agreement between BA and chronological age (CA) were assessed and prediction intervals at 95% were calculated. RESULTS: The repeatability was excellent and the reproducibility was good. Pearson's linear correlation coefficient between CA and BA was 0.983. The mean difference between BA and CA was -0.18 years (boys) and 0.06 years (girls). The prediction interval at 95% for CA was given for each GP category and ranged between 1.2 and more than 4.5 years. CONCLUSION: The GP atlas is a reproducible and repeatable method that is still accurate for the present population, with a high correlation between BA and CA. The prediction intervals at 95% are wide, reflecting individual variability, and should be known when the method is used in forensic cases. KEY POINTS: • The GP atlas is still accurate at the present time. • There is a high correlation between bone age and chronological age. • Individual variability must be known when GP is used in forensic cases. • Prediction intervals (95%) are large; around 4 years after 10 year olds.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Forensic Anthropology/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , France , Hand/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant , Male , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
16.
Forensic Sci Int ; 266: 281-288, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27344264

ABSTRACT

Determination of skeletal development is a key pillar in forensic age estimation of living persons. Radiological assessment of hand bone age is widely used until the age of about 17-18 years, applying visual grading techniques to hand radiographs. This study investigated whether Greulich-Pyle (GP) and Tanner-Whitehouse (TW2) grading can be equally used for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, which would offer the huge benefit of avoiding ionizing radiation. In 18 subjects aged between 7 and 17 years a radiograph and an MRI scan of the hand were performed. Epiphyseal ossification of hand bones was rated by two blinded radiologists with both GP and TW2. Correlation between hand MRIs and radiographs was analyzed by linear regression and inter-observer agreement was assessed. Correlation between age estimates from MRI and radiographs was high for both GP (r(2)=0.98) and TW2 (r(2)=0.93). MRI showed a tendency to estimate age slightly lower for 14-18 year-olds, which would be favorable regarding majority age determination in case this result could be reproduced using a currently not existing reference estimation method based on MRI data. Inter-observer agreement was similar for GP in radiographs and MRI, while for TW2, agreement in MRI was lower than in radiographs. In spite of limitations regarding sample size and recruited subjects, our results indicate that the use of GP and TW2 on MRI data offers the possibility of hand bone age estimation without the need for ionizing radiation.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton/instrumentation , Age Determination by Skeleton/standards , Hand Bones/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Pilot Projects
17.
Korean J Radiol ; 16(1): 201-5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25598691

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability of the Greulich-Pyle (GP) method, Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW3) method and Korean standard bone age chart (KS) in the evaluation of bone age of prepubertal healthy Korean children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Left hand-wrist radiographs of 212 prepubertal healthy Korean children aged 7 to 12 years, obtained for the evaluation of the traumatic injury in emergency department, were analyzed by two observers. Bone age was estimated using the GP method, TW3 method and KS, and was calculated in months. The correlation between bone age measured by each method and chronological age of each child was analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient, scatterplot. The three methods were compared using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between chronological age and bone age estimated by all three methods in whole group and in each gender (R(2) ranged from 0.87 to 0.9, p < 0.01). Although bone age estimated by KS was slightly closer to chronological age than those estimated by the GP and TW3 methods, the difference between three methods was not statistically significant (p > 0.01). CONCLUSION: The KS, GP, and TW3 methods show good reliability in the evaluation of bone age of prepubertal healthy Korean children without significant difference between them. Any are useful for evaluation of bone age in prepubertal healthy Korean children.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Hand/diagnostic imaging , Asian People , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Republic of Korea , Wounds and Injuries
18.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-212751

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability of the Greulich-Pyle (GP) method, Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW3) method and Korean standard bone age chart (KS) in the evaluation of bone age of prepubertal healthy Korean children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Left hand-wrist radiographs of 212 prepubertal healthy Korean children aged 7 to 12 years, obtained for the evaluation of the traumatic injury in emergency department, were analyzed by two observers. Bone age was estimated using the GP method, TW3 method and KS, and was calculated in months. The correlation between bone age measured by each method and chronological age of each child was analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient, scatterplot. The three methods were compared using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between chronological age and bone age estimated by all three methods in whole group and in each gender (R2 ranged from 0.87 to 0.9, p 0.01). CONCLUSION: The KS, GP, and TW3 methods show good reliability in the evaluation of bone age of prepubertal healthy Korean children without significant difference between them. Any are useful for evaluation of bone age in prepubertal healthy Korean children.


Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Asian People , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hand/diagnostic imaging , Republic of Korea , Wounds and Injuries
19.
J Forensic Leg Med ; 22: 26-9, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24485416

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recently, determination of skeletal age, defined as the assessment of bone age, has rapidly become an important task between forensic experts and radiologists. The Greulich-Pyle (GP) atlas is one of the most frequently used methods for the assessment of skeletal age around the world. After presentation of the GP approach for the estimation of the bone age, much research has been conducted to examine the usability of this method in various geographic or ethnic categories. This study investigates on a small-scale and compares the reliability of the GP atlas for assessment of the bone age for four ethnic groups - Asian, African/American, Caucasian and Hispanic - for a different range of ages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plain radiographs of 184 left hands and wrists for males from the healthy sample between 1 to 18 years of age for four ethnic groups were taken. The skeletal age (SA) was estimated by a radiologist using the GP atlas. The blind method was utilized. The mean (SA) results were compared with mean chronological ages (CA) for the separate ethnic groups. SPSS was used to conduct the analysis and the paired t-test was applied to show the difference between the mean CA and mean SA achieved from the GP atlas. RESULTS: The results from the GP atlas were compared to the CA of the samples. In Asian subjects the mean difference was 0.873 years. The GP atlas showed delayed bone age at 2-7 ages (from 0.2 to 2.3 year) and then advanced bone age for age 8. In the African/American subjects the difference between CA and SA was statistically significant (P-value = 0.048). The mean difference in the Caucasian and Hispanic subjects reflects no considerable distinction with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.3088 and 0.3766, respectively, (P-value >0.05 for both groups). CONCLUSION: According to the present study, it is concluded that although the GP atlas is reliable for Caucasian and Hispanic ethnic groups it is not applicable for other ethnic groups for different ranges of age, especially in the sample of the male African/American group from 8 years to 15 years and Asian during childhood. Although it is not clear whether the other references are more useful than this standard, we believe that some enhancement is vital for the GP atlas to obtain more consistent results.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Hand Bones/diagnostic imaging , Racial Groups , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Forensic Anthropology , Hand Bones/anatomy & histology , Humans , Infant , Male , Wrist Joint/anatomy & histology
20.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-457449

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the application of the automatic bone age assessment of BoneXpert software in Children and adolescent of China (Shanghai).Methods Left hand and wrist radiographs of 434 cases of children from trauma (264 boys and 170 girls) were obtained from Jan.2010 to Dec.2013.Bone age was assessed by BoneXpert software and 40 radiographs were randomly chosen and re-evaluated after a week.Results Seven images were rejected by BoneXpert,so the efficiency of the software was 98.4% and it takes only 14.5 s for every image.Sample assessments by two times are exactly the same.As to BoneXpert software,there were statistical differences between bone age and chronological age in 8 groups:7,8,9,11 years old boys and 2,3,9,11 years old girls(P < 0.05) out of 26 groups,and the average difference was about 1 s.The following modifications suggested that 0.57,0.79,0.93,-0.38 and-0.22,0.30,0.37,0.59 years could be added respectively for the groups of boys aged 7,8,9,11 and girls aged 2,3,9,11 years old according to their average differences between the bone age and the chronological age.Conclusions The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity which evaluates bone age objectively and quickly can be applied clinically after slight adjustment in some age groups.BoneXpert software is 100 percent automatic and could eliminate the subjective evaluation inaccuracy.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL