Incarceration of a part of the gastric wall into the abdominal cavity in a patient with hiatal hernia and complete dislocation of the stomach (upside-down stomach).

An upside-down stomach is a rare type of hiatal hernia. An 83-year-old woman presented to the emergency room with abdominal pain and vomiting. Computed tomography revealed an upside-down stomach and the incarceration of a part of the gastric body into the abdominal cavity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a circular ulcer caused by gastric ischemia. Although she was discharged after 1 week of conservative therapy, she was readmitted to the hospital 1 day after discharge because of a recurrence of hiatal hernia incarceration. She underwent laparoscopic surgery 4 days after readmission and recovered successfully.

Acute Gastric Volvulus: A Rare Complication of Hiatal Hernia.

Gastric volvulus, characterized by stomach rotation, is a rare condition arising from congenital or acquired factors. Predominantly affecting pediatric and elderly populations, it necessitates a high index of suspicion for timely diagnosis. Delayed recognition may precipitate severe complications such as ischemia, strangulation, and septic shock, often culminating in fatal outcomes. We present a case of a 71-year-old male initially admitted for suspected gastroenteritis, subsequently developing acute gastric volvulus during hospitalization, necessitating immediate surgical intervention. This case contributes to the scant literature on gastric volvulus in the elderly demographic.

A Rare Case of Early Gastric Cancer With Rapid Bone Involvement.

Gastric cancers rarely metastasize to the bones. If they do, they have a very poor prognosis. We here present a case study of a 56-year-old man who, within a year, rapidly declined and died. He was first revealed to have an erosion found on an esophageal gastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which was later proven to be a poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma. He then proceeded to have a thoracic trans-hiatal esophagogastrostomy with gastric pull-up to resect this cancer. At this point in time, the review of systems and CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis were negative. A few months later, he started having back pain and was diagnosed with metastatic disease of the bones through a CT scan. Although detecting gastric cancer at an early stage is rare, it is shown to have a better prognosis. It is, therefore, very important to reflect on the possibility of engaging in earlier screening to detect gastric cancers at an earlier stage to minimize the risk of invasions of other organs, especially for those who have other risk factors such as obesity and tobacco use. We believe it is prudent to ensure close follow-up with any patient with early gastric cancer to potentially detect recurrence or metastasis in a timely fashion.

Comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic techniques in hiatal hernia and crural repair: a review of current evidence and outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate the implementation of robotic surgery in hiatal hernia and crural repair, based on the existing literature and to compare this approach to other established techniques. METHODS: We performed a non- systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE on February 25, 2024 for papers published to date focusing on the surgical repair of hiatal hernias using the robotic platform. After eliminating publications based on eligibility criteria, 13 studies were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized in hiatal hernia repair due to its enhanced ergonomics and superior visualization capabilities. Operative times vary, with some studies indicating longer durations for robotic surgery (e.g., Giovannetti et al. demonstrated median operative time of 196 min for robotic compared to 145 min for laparoscopic) while others report shorter times (e.g., Lang F et al. demonstrated 88 min for robotic versus 102 min for laparoscopic). Recurrence rates between robotic and laparoscopic repairs are comparable, with reported recurrence rates of 1.8% for robotic and 1.2% for laparoscopic approaches by Benedix et al. Robotic surgery offers potential advantages, including reduced intraoperative blood loss (e.g., Giovannetti et al. mentioned median blood loss of 20 ml for robotic versus 50 ml for laparoscopic). The length of hospital stay and postoperative complication rates also vary, with some studies suggesting shorter stays and fewer complications for robotic surgery as surgeons become more proficient. Soliman et al. reported a statistically significant reduction in complication rates with robotic surgery (6.3% versus 19.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery presents promising results regarding the length of hospital stay, conversion rate to open surgery and postoperative complication rates when compared to laparoscopy based on the existing literature. Despite the lack of striking differences, robotic hiatal hernia repair is a valid and evolving approach.

Sigmoid Volvulus in the Setting of Type 4 Hiatal Hernia: An Uncommon Presentation and Literature Review.

Hiatal hernias occur when intra-abdominal contents protrude into the diaphragmatic opening. Of the four classifications, Type 4 hiatal hernias are the most rare and severe. They develop from herniation of the gastroesophageal junction and abdominal viscera other than the stomach into the thoracic cavity. The resulting increase in intrathoracic pressure can cause a wide variety of symptoms on presentation and potentially lead to misdiagnosis. We present a rare case in which a 78-year-old woman presented with nonspecific symptoms and was diagnosed with incarcerated Type 4 hiatal hernia with sigmoid volvulus. We also report a literature review from 2015 to emphasize the importance of recognizing diverse symptomatic presentations in complex Type 4 hiatal hernias and the need for a comprehensive evaluation, as early detection and prompt intervention are essential in preventing life-threatening complications.

Fundoplication vs. gastric fixation for the management of emergency hiatal hernia repairs: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of literature comparing safety outcomes between formal fundoplication and gastric fixation procedures for hiatal hernia repairs, especially in the emergency setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate 30-day clinical outcomes between fundoplication and gastric fixation performed in emergency hiatal hernia repairs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2011 to 2021 was conducted. The study population was determined using ICD9/10 codes describing diaphragmatic hernia without obstruction or gangrene, with obstruction, and with gangrene. Elective cases were excluded. CPT codes were used to group fundoplication procedures and gastric fixation procedures. The primary outcome was the 30-day complication rate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, reoperation and mortality rates. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for clinically relevant confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 971 and 346 were in the fundoplication and gastric fixation groups, respectively. Fundoplication was associated with a significantly lower (p < 0.05) 30-day complication, reoperation and mortality rates. There was no statistically significant difference with respect to readmission. After adjustment, fundoplication was significantly associated with a decrease in odds of 30-day complications (OR 0.53, p < 0.001 95% CI 0.40-0.71) and mortality (OR 0.55, p = 0.033 95% CI 0.32-0.95). However, there was no significant difference with respect to 30-day readmission (OR 0.86, p = 0.449 95% CI 0.59-1.27) and reoperation (OR 0.66, p = 0.063 95% CI 0.42-1.02). CONCLUSION: Patients with hiatal hernias that underwent emergent repair with fundoplication had a significantly lower 30-day complication and mortality rates compared to those who underwent gastric fixation procedures. Fundoplication is a safe and feasible approach to manage hiatal hernias in the emergency setting for select patients.

Hiatal Hernia With Ulcer at the Gastroesophageal Junction Presenting With Progressive Dysphagia and Epigastric Pain: A Case Report.

A hiatal hernia occurs when the contents of the abdominal cavity, most often the stomach, protrude into the chest cavity through the esophageal hiatus. The hiatus is an elliptical-shaped outlet, typically formed by parts of the right diaphragmatic crus surrounding the distal esophagus. This ailment can transpire due to either the broadening of the specific diaphragmatic opening or a shortening in the overall length of the esophagus, leading to herniation of the stomach into the thoracic region. Raised pressure in the abdominal region may also be one of the culprits. Patients with a hiatal hernia usually remain asymptomatic, but patients might have difficulty swallowing both liquids and solids in the advanced stages of the disease. The disease is rarely accompanied by reflux of gastric acid into the esophagus due to decreased activity of the lower esophageal sphincter, leading to increased complaints of epigastric pain and ulceration near the gastroesophageal junction. Long-standing cases can increase the risk of developing Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia, which may advance to esophageal carcinoma in later stages. Advanced age and obesity are significant risk factors for hiatal hernia. Obese individuals, in particular, experience higher intra-abdominal pressure, which significantly raises the likelihood of developing a hiatal hernia. The hernia may be diagnosed through an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or radiologically through a chest X-ray in the posterior-anterior view, defining the border of the esophagus. Hence, this facilitates a more seamless and precise diagnosis. Surgical fundoplication treatment improves the patient's condition better than solitary medical management. Overall, addressing the condition surgically often yields more favorable outcomes and enhances the patient's quality of life. Hiatal hernia usually presents with no or minimal clinical manifestations. Thus, this case report highlights the importance of comprehensive clinical management of such cases.

Efficient artificial intelligence-based assessment of the gastroesophageal valve with Hill classification through active learning.

Standardized assessment of the gastroesophageal valve during endoscopy, attainable via the Hill classification, is important for clinical assessment and therapeutic decision making. The Hill classification is associated with the presence of hiatal hernia (HH), a common endoscopic finding connected to gastro-esophageal reflux disease. A novel efficient medical artificial intelligence (AI) training pipeline using active learning (AL) is designed. We identified 21,970 gastroscopic images as training data and used our AL to train a model for predicting the Hill classification and detecting HH. Performance of the AL and traditionally trained models were evaluated on an external expert-annotated image collection. The AL model achieved accuracy of 76%. A traditionally trained model with 125% more training data achieved 77% accuracy. Furthermore, the AL model achieved higher precision than the traditional one for rare classes, with 0.54 versus 0.39 (p < 0.05) for grade 3 and 0.72 versus 0.61 (p < 0.05) for grade 4. In detecting HH, the AL model achieved 94% accuracy, 0.72 precision and 0.74 recall. Our AL pipeline is more efficient than traditional methods in training AI for endoscopy.

Robotic Repair of a Paraesophageal Hernia After an Open Nissen Fundoplication: Case Presentation and Clinical Discussion.

We present a female in her sixties with a recurrent paraesophageal hernia status post open Nissen fundoplication and multiple esophageal dilations who underwent a robotic paraesophageal hernia repair, with extensive lysis of adhesions. The stomach and esophagus were dissected off the crura and the previous wrap was undone. Once the entirety of the stomach and esophagus were freed from their surrounding structures, the hernia sac was able to be excised. The crural defect was closed and gastropexy was performed. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged home. This case is presented to provide evidence that robotic repair presents a viable option in the reoperation of patients following an open Nissen fundoplication as well as provide an overview of the types of hiatal hernias and the indications and options for surgical intervention.

Dynamics of hiatal hernia recurrence: how important is a composite crural repair?

INTRODUCTION: Hiatal hernia recurrence rates vary widely. The true causes of recurrences are not fully understood but likely multifactorial. Surgical approaches and techniques have evolved over time to try and reduce recurrence rates after hiatal hernia repair. Our objective is to provide a current review on the physiology of hiatal hernias and the importance of a composite crural repair on hiatal hernia recurrence rates; more specifically, for this review, a composite repair is defined as a repair requiring more than primary closure of the crura. METHODS: A recent review of the literature was conducted to identify studies reporting on hiatal hernia pathophysiology, stress, and tension, as well as the role of composite repair. RESULTS: There is a paucity of studies focusing on the pathophysiology of hiatal hernias and recurrence rates. Articles that report on the pathophysiology of the hiatus were found to have alterations of the extracellular matrix, collagen composition, changes in metalloproteinases (MMPs), and differences in genetic composition. The role of composite repair on reducing recurrence rates is not well studied. CONCLUSIONS: Hiatal hernias remain a complex problem with no ideal surgical technique. It is likely that the pathophysiology of hiatal hernias is multifactorial, and more studies need to be done to better understand the potential underlying mechanisms for hiatal hernias so this may also further identify the ideal surgical repair.

A Case of Cameron Lesions: An Overlooked Cause of Anemia in Patients With Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Hiatal Hernia.

Cameron lesions are rare causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). The lesions are linear erosions or ulcers that develop in the sac of a hiatal hernia, which often go unnoticed in the upper gastrointestinal system, and are a prevalent cause of anemia resulting from iron deficiency. Postponed treatment can result in severe consequences such as potentially fatal hemorrhaging. Here, we present a case of a young woman who presented to the emergency room with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding and severe microcytic anemia. The chest X-ray revealed a partial intrathoracic stomach, and a large hiatal hernia was subsequently confirmed in the CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis. The esophagogastroduodenal endoscopy indicated Los Angeles Classification System grade A reflux esophagitis and an 8 cm hiatal hernia with multiple Cameron ulcers with pigmented material and chronic non-erosive gastritis. Biopsies of the gastric body and antrum showed Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic active gastritis and intestinal metaplasia. An esophagus biopsy showed squamous esophageal mucosa with mild chronic inflammation. The patient was treated with a transfusion of three units of red blood cells, iron replenishment, and pantoprazole infusion and underwent hiatal hernia repair with mesh and Toupet fundoplication without any complications. After that, the patient was discharged and scheduled for follow-up with general surgery at the outpatient clinic.

Full esophageal mobilization during hiatal hernia repair with concomitant sleeve gastrectomy improves postoperative reflux symptoms for patients with preexisting reflux.

BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia repair (HHR) performed concurrently with vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) has been shown to improve postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, data on the optimal extent of esophageal mobilization during repair are lacking. Mobilization techniques for HHR during VSG include partial (PM) or full (FM) mobilization of the esophagus. We hypothesize that patients who undergo full mobilization will be less likely to develop postoperative reflux. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of all patients who underwent a VSG with a HHR between 2014 and 2021 was conducted. The primary outcome was postoperative reflux symptoms defined by diagnosis in the medical record, utilization of anti-reflux medications, and GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scores obtained via patient surveys. RESULTS: There were 190 patients included with 80 patients (42.1%) undergoing PM and 110 (57.9%) undergoing FM. Rates of preoperative reflux were similar between the two groups (47.5% vs. 51.8%; p = 0.55). During the GERD-HRQL survey, there were 114 patients (60.0%) contacted with a participation rate of 91.2% (104 patients). Patients with preoperative reflux who underwent PM were found to have a higher rate of reported postoperative reflux (90.0% vs. 62.5%; p = 0.03) and higher GERD-HRQL scores (16.40 ± 9.95 vs. 10.84 ± 9.01; p = 0.04). Patients without preoperative reflux did not have a significant difference in reported reflux (55.0% vs. 51.7%; p = 0.82) or GERD-HRQL scores (12.35 ± 14.14 vs. 9.93 ± 9.46; p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: Our study found that postoperative GERD was higher in patients with preexisting reflux who underwent partial esophageal mobilization during concurrent hiatal hernia repair with vertical sleeve gastrectomy. In patients without preoperative GERD, our data suggest that postoperative reflux symptoms are not dependent on the extent of esophageal mobilization during hiatal hernia repair with vertical sleeve gastrectomy.

Platelet-Rich Therapies in Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Review of the Impact of Platelet Concentrates on Mesh Integration in Hernia Management.

Mesh-augmented hernia repair is the gold standard in abdominal wall and hiatal/diaphragmatic hernia management and ranks among the most common procedures performed by general surgeons. However, it is associated with a series of drawbacks, including recurrence, mesh infection, and adhesion formation. To address these weaknesses, numerous biomaterials have been investigated for mesh coating. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous agent that promotes tissue healing through numerous cytokines and growth factors. In addition, many reports highlight its contribution to better integration of different types of coated meshes, compared to conventional uncoated meshes. The use of PRP-coated meshes for hernia repair has been reported in the literature, but a review of technical aspects and outcomes is missing. The aim of this comprehensive review is to report the experimental studies investigating the synergistic use of PRP and mesh implants in hernia animal models. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus without chronological constraints. In total, fourteen experimental and three clinical studies have been included. Among experimental trials, synthetic, biologic, and composite meshes were used in four, nine, and one study, respectively. In synthetic meshes, PRP-coating leads to increased antioxidant levels and collaged deposition, reduced oxidative stress, and improved inflammatory response, while studies on biological meshes revealed increased neovascularization and tissue integration, reduced inflammation, adhesion severity, and mechanical failure rates. Finally, PRP-coating of composite meshes results in reduced adhesions and improved mechanical strength. Despite the abundance of preclinical data, there is a scarcity of clinical studies, mainly due to the absence of an established protocol regarding PRP preparation and application. To this point in time, PRP has been used as a coating agent for the repair of abdominal and diaphragmatic hernias, as well as for mesh fixation. Clinical application of conclusions drawn from experimental studies may lead to improved results in hernia repair.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs have yielded conflicting results. We sought to analyze early postoperative complications between these approaches using a newly available NSQIP variable indicating robot use. METHODS: We queried the 2022 ACS NSQIP database for adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare cohort characteristics. Logistic, linear, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare perioperative outcomes between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. RESULTS: We identified 4345 patients who underwent repair using a laparoscopic (2778 patients; 63.9%) or robotic (1567 patients; 36.1%) approach. Most (73.1%) were female, and the median age was 65 (IQR 55, 73). Patients who underwent robotic repair were younger (median age 64 vs 66), had a slightly higher body mass index (BMI; median 30.2 vs 29.9), and were more likely to have hypertension (53.0% vs 48.5%), all p < 0.01. On unadjusted analysis the robotic approach was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (0.0% vs 0.4%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, gender, race, BMI, and hypertension, the robotic approach was not associated with increased major complications (5.6% vs 5.1%, AOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.86, 1.49), minor complications (0.9% vs 1.5%, AOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.74, 1.93), or unplanned readmission (6.5% vs 5.5%, AHR 1.17, 95% CI 0.89, 1.54), all p ≥ 0.26. After adjusting for age and hypertension, the robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction (AOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.01, 6.33, p = 0.048) and pulmonary embolism (AOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.17, 6.49, p = 0.02), although none resulted in 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs had similar overall complication and readmission rates. The robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism but no 30-day mortality. Current data support the use of both robotic and laparoscopic approaches for paraesophageal hernia repair.

Spontaneous Mediastinal Gastric Perforation in Hiatal Hernia with Difficult Surgical Technique Selection: A Case Report.

Emergency surgery for a hiatal hernia (HH) is uncommon. However, mediastinal gastric perforation may occasionally present as the initial symptom of HH and demonstrate high mortality rates. Managing mediastinal gastric perforation in HH has no established standard surgical technique, and the selection of surgical techniques may be challenging. A 78-year-old female patient was referred to our department because of an upper gastrointestinal perforation in HH based on computed tomography (CT) results. Determining the possibility of esophageal perforation and intrathoracic penetration was difficult according to CT results alone, and whether a transthoracic or transabdominal approach was preferable. We diagnosed the patient with a mediastinal gastric perforation in HH without intrathoracic penetration based on an additional gastrointestinal contrast study and a right thoracentesis. We treated the patient with laparotomy, involving the perforation site and esophageal hiatus closure and gastropexy. Postoperatively, the patient experienced complications associated with delayed gastric emptying and aspiration pneumonia. Fortunately, no severe infections, such as residual abscess formation or empyema, were observed, and the recovery progressed favorably. Mediastinal gastric perforation should be considered a differential diagnosis for elderly patients with sudden-onset chest pain and dyspnea, and the threshold for imaging should be lowered. Identifying the perforation site and the presence of intrathoracic penetration based on preoperative results is useful for determining the appropriate surgical technique. Postoperative quality of life to the extent feasible needs to be considered, as the selection of surgical technique may cause subsequent recurrence or reflux symptoms.

Association of gastroesophageal junction laxity and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a prevalent condition with significant clinical variability, complicating its evaluation and treatment. The gastroesophageal flap valve is a fundamental evaluation method, but have shown limitations in specificity and reliance on subjective endoscopists' experience. Recent insights suggest that gastroesophageal junction laxity may offer an objective and quantifiable measurement for the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 401 patients who underwent comprehensive evaluations, including a symptom questionnaire, endoscopy, pH-impedance monitoring, high-resolution manometry, and treatment directions, between January 1, 2022 and October 31, 2023. Gastroesophageal junction laxity was assessed using a modified approach based on endoscopic image analysis, with the diameter of endoscope as reference to estimate the long diameter of the laxity ring. The independent association of gastroesophageal junction laxity with pathologic acid exposure, esophagitis, and hiatal hernia were assessed by adjusting with age and sex. RESULTS: The mean age was 44.5 ± 5.5 years old, and 49.9% (200/401) were male. The most common symptoms (≥ 1 point) were acid regurgitation (333/401, 83.0%), heartburn (315/401, 78.6%), belching (278/401, 69.3%), bloating (241/401, 60.1%), and globus sensation (241/401, 60.1%). The gastroesophageal junction laxity was significantly associated with pathologic acid exposure, esophagitis, hiatal hernia, and lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure. Notably, with the increase in gastroesophageal junction laxity, the rates of pathologic acid exposure, esophagitis, and hiatal hernia increased gradually, the lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure decreased gradually. The gastroesophageal junction laxity was independent associated with pathologic acid exposure (OR = 2.33, 95%CI 1.77-3.07, p < 0.001), esophagitis (OR = 2.10, 95%CI 1.62-2.73, p < 0.001), and hiatal hernia (high-resolution manometry: OR = 3.39, 95%CI: 2.46-4.67, p < 0.001) (endoscopy: OR = 21.65, 95%CI 11.70-40.06, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The gastroesophageal junction laxity was significantly associated with the indicators of pathophysiology in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Risk factors associated with radiological and clinical recurrences after laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia with TiO2Mesh™ reinforcement.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic repair of large para-esophageal hiatal hernias (LPHH) remains controversial. Several meta-analyses suggest hiatus reinforcement with mesh has better outcomes over cruroplasty in terms of less recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term results of treating LPHH with a biosynthetic monofilament polypropylene mesh coated with titanium dioxide to enhance biocompatibility (TiO2Mesh™). METHODS: A retrospective observational study, using data extracted from a prospectively collected database was performed at XXX from December 2014 to June 2023. Included participants were all patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of large (> 5 cm) type III hiatal hernia in which a TiO2Mesh™ was used. The results of the study, including clinical and radiological recurrences as well as mesh-related morbidity, were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were finally analyzed. Laparoscopic approach was attempted in all but conversion was needed in one patient because of bleeding in the lesser curvature. With a median follow-up of 41 months (and 10 losses to follow-up), 22% of radiological recurrences and 19.3% of clinical recurrences were described. Regarding complications, one patient presented morbidity associated with the mesh (mesh erosion requiring endoscopic extraction). Recurrent hernia repair was an independent factor of clinical recurrence (OR 4.57 95% CI (1.28-16.31)). CONCLUSION: LPHH with TiO2Mesh™ is safe and feasible with a satisfactory medium-term recurrence and a low complication rate. Prospective randomized studies are needed to establish the standard repair of LPHH.

Is Vaginal Laxity Associated with Vaginal Parity and Mode of Delivery?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Vaginal laxity (VL) is a common symptom of pelvic floor dysfunction. Although VL has become a frequent topic for research in the last decade, its pathogenesis is still not well understood. The objective was to determine whether vaginal parity or mode of delivery is associated with vaginal laxity. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study involving women seen in a tertiary urogynecology clinic between May 2016 and November 2018 with symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction. Patients underwent a standardized interview, clinical examination (POP-Q), and four-dimensional (4D) pelvic floor ultrasound (PFUS). Data regarding vaginal parity and the mode of delivery were based on patient-reported information. Archived 4D-PFUS volumes were analyzed offline to evaluate levator hiatal area on Valsalva. RESULTS: Data from 1,051 patients were analyzed. VL was reported by 236 women (23%) who were younger on average (mean age 54 vs 59 years, p < 0.001) and less likely to be menopausal (530 out of 815 [65.0%] vs.129 out of 236 [54.7%]), p = 0.004]. Symptoms of prolapse were much more common in the VL group (214 out of 236 [91%] vs 316 out of 815 [39%], p = < 0.001) and on imaging mean levator hiatal area (HA) on Valsalva was larger (31 vs 26 cm2, p = 0.01). Vaginal parity was associated with VL symptoms (235 out of 236 [99%] vs 767 out of 815 [94%], p = 0.008), but neither VL prevalence nor bother increased with higher parity. Women who delivered vaginally were three times more likely to complain of VL than those who delivered only by cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal laxity was found to be more prevalent in vaginally parous women. This effect seems to be largely attributable to the first delivery. Instrumental delivery was not shown to increase association with VL compared with normal vaginal delivery.

The classification of hiatal shapes and their use as a marker for complexity, operative interventions, and recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic reconstruction is a vital, but challenging component of hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery. Results are optimized by minimizing axial tension along the esophagus, assessed with intra-abdominal length, and radial tension across the hiatus, which has not been standardized. We categorized hiatal openings into 4 shapes, as a surrogate for radial tension, to correlate their association with operative interventions and recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all primary hiatal hernias (≥3 cm) repaired at a single center between 2010 and 2020. Patients with intraoperative hiatal photos with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. The hiatal openings were classified into 4 shapes: slit, inverted teardrop, "D," and oval, and ordered in this manner of hypothesized increased complexity and tension. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients were studied, with 113 (47%) having a recurrence. Age (P < .001), proportion of paraesophageal hernias (P < .001), hernia axial length (P < .001), and hiatal width (P < .001) all increased as shape progressed from slit to inverted teardrop to "D" to oval. Mesh (P = .003) and relaxing incisions (P < .001) were more commonly employed in more advanced shapes, "D" and ovals. However, recurrence (P = .88) did not correlate with hiatal shape. CONCLUSION: Four different hiatal shapes are commonly seen during hernia repair. These shapes represent a spectrum of hernia chronicity and complexity necessitating increased use of operative measures but not correlating with recurrence. Despite failing to be a direct marker for recurrence risk, hiatal shape may serve as an intraoperative tool to inform surgeons of the potential need for additional hiatal interventions.