Evaluating high-flow oxygen therapy after mechanical thrombectomy under general anesthesia in acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: The use of mechanical thrombectomy for acute intracranial vascular occlusion under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation is well-established as a safe and effective method. However, the process of extubation post-surgery presents challenges for certain patients. This retrospective study assesses the safety and efficacy of combining mechanical ventilation with high-flow oxygen inhalation as an interim strategy, while also examining its impact on long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS: This research enrolled 119 patients with acute intracranial large vessel occlusion who underwent mechanical thrombectomy under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation between January 2020 and November 2023. Participants were categorized into two groups: Group 1 (n=55), which received high-flow oxygen (HFO) post-extubation, and Group 2 (n=64), which was treated with routine oxygen supplementation (RO). The study compared reintubation and tracheotomy rates between these groups to determine safety and effectiveness. Additionally, it analyzed long-term clinical outcomes by comparing NIHSS and mRS scores before treatment and at 90-day follow-up. RESULTS: The reintubation rate post-extubation was significantly lower in the HFO group (12.7 %, n=7) compared to the RO group (31.2 %, n=20, p=0.016). The incidence of tracheotomy within 7 days was also reduced in the HFO group compared to the RO group (7.3 %, n=4 vs 20.3 %, n=13, p=0.043). Moreover, a greater proportion of patients in the HFO group achieved mRS scores of 0-2 at 90 days post-stroke than those in the RO group (60 %, n=33 vs 40.6 %, n=26, p=0.035). The median NIHSS score at 90 days was more favorable in the HFO group than in the RO group (6, IQR [1-18] vs 8, IQR [1-20], p=0.005). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that high-flow oxygen therapy after mechanical thrombectomy under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation may lessen the need for reintubation and tracheotomy, potentially leading to improved long-term prognosis.

Development of clinical tools to estimate the breathing effort during high-flow oxygen therapy: A multicenter cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Quantifying breathing effort in non-intubated patients is important but difficult. We aimed to develop two models to estimate it in patients treated with high-flow oxygen therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the data of 260 patients from previous studies who received high-flow oxygen therapy. Their breathing effort was measured as the maximal deflection of esophageal pressure (ΔPes). We developed a multivariable linear regression model to estimate ΔPes (in cmH2O) and a multivariable logistic regression model to predict the risk of ΔPes being >10 cmH2O. Candidate predictors included age, sex, diagnosis of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), respiratory rate, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, the results of arterial blood gas analysis, including base excess concentration (BEa) and the ratio of arterial tension to the inspiratory fraction of oxygen (PaO2:FiO2), and the product term between COVID-19 and PaO2:FiO2. RESULTS: We found that ΔPes can be estimated from the presence or absence of COVID-19, BEa, respiratory rate, PaO2:FiO2, and the product term between COVID-19 and PaO2:FiO2. The adjusted R2 was 0.39. The risk of ΔPes being >10 cmH2O can be predicted from BEa, respiratory rate, and PaO2:FiO2. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.79 (0.73-0.85). We called these two models BREF, where BREF stands for BReathing EFfort and the three common predictors: BEa (B), respiratory rate (RE), and PaO2:FiO2 (F). CONCLUSIONS: We developed two models to estimate the breathing effort of patients on high-flow oxygen therapy. Our initial findings are promising and suggest that these models merit further evaluation.

Dyspnea is severe and associated with a higher intubation rate in de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is a key symptom of de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. This study explores dyspnea and its association with intubation and mortality in this population. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dyspnea was quantified by a visual analog scale (dyspnea-VAS) from zero to 100 mm. Dyspnea was measured in 259 of the 310 patients included. Factors associated with intubation were assessed with a competing risks model taking into account ICU discharge. The Cox model was used to evaluate factors associated with 90-day mortality. RESULTS: At baseline (randomization in the parent trial), median dyspnea-VAS was 46 (interquartile range, 16-65) mm and was ≥ 40 mm in 146 patients (56%). The intubation rate was 45%. Baseline variables independently associated with intubation were moderate (dyspnea-VAS 40-64 mm) and severe (dyspnea-VAS ≥ 65 mm) dyspnea at baseline (sHR 1.96 and 2.61, p = 0.023), systolic arterial pressure (sHR 2.56, p < 0.001), heart rate (sHR 1.94, p = 0.02) and PaO2/FiO2 (sHR 0.34, p = 0.028). 90-day mortality was 20%. The cumulative probability of survival was lower in patients with baseline dyspnea-VAS ≥ 40 mm (logrank test, p = 0.049). Variables independently associated with mortality were SAPS 2 ≥ 25 (p < 0.001), moderate-to-severe dyspnea at baseline (p = 0.073), PaO2/FiO2 (p = 0.118), and treatment arm (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: In patients admitted to the ICU for de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, dyspnea is associated with a higher risk of intubation and with a higher mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier # NCT01320384.

New Insight into Laryngo-Tracheal Surgery: High-Flow Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Early Complications after Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Early post-operative airway management after laryngo-tracheal surgery is crucial. Acute respiratory failure due to glottis' edema may occur, requiring reintubation. This can prolong ventilatory assistance, jeopardizing anastomosis. To date, only judicious steroid administration and fluid management are available to avoid more invasive procedures. High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) is a noninvasive O2 support method providing humidification, warmed air, and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (AIRVO2). No data about HFOT use to prevent early complications after laryngo-tracheal surgery are reported in the literature. METHODS: Between September 2020 and September 2022, 107 consecutive patients who underwent laryngo-tracheal surgery received HFOT (Group A). Data and long-term results were compared with those of 80 patients operated between September 2018 and August 2020 (Group B), when HFOT was not available. All patients were operated in a single center. No pre- or post-operative settings changed, except for HFOT introduction. We analyzed and compared the risk for "delayed" reintubation (unexpected reintubation within the first 24-48 h after extubating/laryngeal mask removal) in the two groups. RESULTS: No patients reported HFOT-related adverse events. The control group (B) presented "delayed" reintubation in 37% (p = 0.027), intensive care unit admission in 67% (p = 0.005) and longer hospital stay (p = 0.001) compared to the HFOT group (A). The minor complications' rate was 3% in both group and overall mortality was 0%. Re-stenosis was described in 4.6% of the HFOT group, without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.7006). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to investigate HFOT use in patients undergoing laryngo-tracheal surgery, potentially representing a consistent innovation in the peri-operative management of these patients. With the limitation of a retrospective series, we would suggest HFOT use for preventing post-operative reintubation rate, possibly reducing ICU admissions and hospital stays.

Performance Characterisation of the Airvo2TM Nebuliser Adapter in Combination with the Aerogen SoloTM Vibrating Mesh Nebuliser for in Line Aerosol Therapy during High Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy.

High flow oxygen (HFO) therapy is a well-established treatment in respiratory disease. Concurrent aerosol delivery can greatly expediate their recovery. The aim of this work was to complete a comprehensive characterisation of one such HFO therapy system, the Airvo2TM, used in combination with the Aerogen SoloTM vibrating mesh nebuliser. Representative adult, infant, and paediatric head models were connected to a breathing simulator via a collection filter placed at the level of the trachea. A tracheostomy interface and nasal cannulas were used to deliver the aerosol. Cannula size and gas flow rate were varied across the full operating range recommended by the manufacturer. The tracheal and emitted doses were quantified via UV-spectrophotometry. The aerosol droplet diameter at the exit of the nares and tracheal interface was measured via cascade impaction. High gas flow rates resulted in low emitted and tracheal doses (%). Nasal cannula size had no significant effect on the tracheal dose (%) available in infant and paediatric models. Higher gas flow rates resulted in smaller aerosol droplets at the exit of the nares and tracheostomy interface. Gas flow rate was found to be the primary parameter affecting aerosol delivery. Thus, gas flow rates should be kept low and where possible, delivered using larger nasal cannulas to maximise aerosol delivery.

Surfactant therapy using vibrating-mesh nebulizers in adults with COVID-19-induced ARDS: A case series.

Coronavirus adult respiratory distress syndrome, characterized by decreased surfactant due to lysis of type II pneumocytes and hyaline membrane formation, contributes to severe hypoxemia. The administration of surfactant via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) may positively affect lung structure and function in this context. In this study, we report on five clinical cases, encompassing patients aged 40-60 years of both sexes, who tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 via real-time polymerase chain reaction and exhibited significant pulmonary compromise with elevated inflammatory biomarkers. These patients were treated with aerosol therapy using surfactant delivered through vibrating-mesh nebulizers alongside HFNC. Of these patients, four demonstrated positive responses to the treatment, suggesting that aerosol therapy with surfactant through vibrating-mesh nebulizers could be a viable rescue therapy in adults receiving HFNC oxygen therapy for hypoxemic respiratory failure caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Unfortunately, one patient had a negative outcome and succumbed. The findings from these cases indicate that the use of aerosol therapy with vibrating-mesh nebulizers as rescue therapy might offer an alternative approach for managing adults with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2, as evidenced by the positive outcomes in four out of the five cases presented.

Intraoperative high flow oxygen therapy for tubeless anaesthesia in thoracoscopic surgery.

Tubeless anaesthesia has become widespread in videothoracoscopic surgery, even in major procedures such as lobectomies. There are several advantages in avoiding general anaesthesia and one-lung mechanical ventilation, such as faster recovery and shorter hospital stays. However, hypoxaemia and hypercapnia are the most reported causes of conversion to general anaesthesia. High Flow Oxygen Therapy (HFOT) generates flow-dependent positive end-expiratory pressure, improves oxygenation and also carbon dioxide washout by flow-dependent dead space flushing. For this reason, intraoperative HFOT may reduce the rate of conversion to general anaesthesia. We report our experience with intraoperative HFOT in a 71-year-old female with lung adenocarcinoma undergoing VATS upper left lobectomy.

Non-invasive ventilation in neonates: a review of current literature.

Moving from an era of invasive ventilation to that of non-invasive respiratory support, various modalities have emerged resulting in improved neonatal outcomes. Respiratory distress is the commonest problem seen both in preterm and term neonates, and the use of appropriate respiratory support could be lifesaving. This article reviews the currently available non-invasive ventilation (NIV) strategies in neonates including nasal continuous positive airway pressure, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), bi-level CPAP, heated humidified high flow nasal cannula, nasal high-frequency ventilation (NHFV) and non-invasive neutrally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA). Though multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses have indicated the superiority of synchronized NIPPV over the other forms of non-invasive respiratory support in neonates, there is no single NIV modality that universally suits all. Hence, the choice of NIV for a neonate should be individualized based on its efficacy, the disease pathology, resource settings, the clinician's familiarity and parental values. Future studies should evaluate emerging modalities such as NIV-NAVA and NHFV in the respiratory management of neonates as the evidence pertaining to these is insufficient.

Cost Analysis of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy Compared with Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Severe COVID-19 in Colombia: Data from a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: A randomized clinical trial (HiFlo-COVID-19 Trial) showed that among patients with severe COVID-19, treatment with high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) significantly reduced the need for invasive mechanical ventilation support and time for clinical recovery compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT). However, the cost of this strategy is unknown. Objective: We examined total cost of HFOT treatment compared with COT in real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a post-trial-based cost analysis from the perspective of a managed competition healthcare system, using actual records of billed costs. Cost categories include general ward, intensive care unit, procedures, imaging, laboratories, medications, supplies, and others. Results: A total of 188 participants (mean age 60, 33% female) were included. Average costs (and standard deviation) in the HFOT group were USD $7992 (7394) and in the COT group USD $ 10,190 (9402). Differences, however, did not reach statistical significance (P=0.093). However, resource use was always less costly for the HNFO group, with an overall percentage decrease of 27%. Two categories make up 72% of all savings: medications (41%) and intensive care unit (31%). Conclusion: For patients in ICU with severe COVID-19 the cost of treatment with HFOT as compared to COT is likely to be cost-saving due to less use of medications and length of stay in ICU.

Use of high-flow oxygen therapy in a cat with cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

Case summary: A 7-month-old female spayed domestic shorthair cat was presented for respiratory distress due to cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Despite initial treatment and oxygen delivery in an oxygen tent, the cat still showed signs of severe respiratory effort and oxygen saturation measured via pulse oximetry was below 85%. Because the owners declined mechanical ventilation, the cat was transitioned to high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT). HFOT allowed significant improvement of the respiration parameters within 15 mins without causing clinical complications. The cat was briefly anaesthetised for the placement of the nasal cannula on initiation of HFOT, and the interface was well tolerated thereafter. The cat was transitioned to an oxygen cage after 16 h, weaned from oxygen 4 h later and was discharged after 3 days of hospitalisation. Long-term follow-up showed no abnormalities, and the leading hypothesis was transient myocardial thickening. Relevance and novel information: The first use of HFOT in a dyspneic cat is described in this study. HFOT could be a life-saving option for cats with severe hypoxemia or do-not-intubate orders that fail to respond to conventional oxygen therapies.

Effect of modified high-flow oxygen therapy on positive end-expiratory pressure and end-expiratory lung volume based on simulated lung platform.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of modified high-flow oxygen therapy on end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in tracheotomized patients with normal pulmonary, acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: A ventilator and an artificial lung model were used to simulate the normal or strong inspiratory effort state of normal lung, AHRF and COPD patients. The traditional high-flow respiratory humidification therapy device connected with a standard interface (group A), and the modified therapy device added two types of resistance valves (group B, inner diameter 7.7 mm, length 24.0 mm; group C, inner diameter 7.7 mm, length 34.0 mm) to the exhalation end of the standard interface. The changes of end-expiratory lung volume (ΔEELV) and PEEP with the increase of flow rate (10 L/min, 20 L/min, 30 L/min, 40 L/min, 50 L/min, 60 L/min) in the three groups was recorded. Results: Under simulated conditions of normal lung, AHRF and COPD, as the flow rate increased by using the modified therapy device, the PEEP values in all groups showed an exponential increasing trend, and the ΔEELV also increased accordingly. In addition, under the same flow rate level, the PEEP values of the two modified high-flow oxygen therapies (Group B and Group C) were significantly higher than those of the standard high-flow oxygen therapy (Group A) (p < 0.05). In the normal lung model with normal or strong inspiratory effort, and in the AHRF or COPD model with strong inspiratory effort, when the flow rate was higher than 30 L/min, the PEEP levels of Group B were significantly lower than those of Group C (p < 0.05). In the AHRF model with normal inspiratory effort, when the flow rate was between 10 L/min and 60 L/min, the PEEP levels of Group B were significantly lower than those of Group C (p < 0.05). Moreover, in the COPD model with normal inspiratory effort, the PEEP levels of Group B were significantly lower than that of Group C only when the flow rate was 60 L/min (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The addition of different types of resistance valves to the high-flow exhalation end may be a feasible solution to improve the clinical efficacy of tracheotomized high-flow oxygen therapy.

Efficacy of a surgical mask during high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in preventing aerosol dispersion: a randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: It is not clear whether or not high-flow nasal oxygenation used in patients with severe respiratory tract infection, or coughing, increases the risk of infection to the healthcare personnel, and whether or not applying a surgical mask to the patient's face or treating the patient in a negative-pressure room can reduce the risk. METHODS: In a randomized crossover design, we compared in 50 participants receiving high-flow nasal oxygenation, the aerosol counts measured at approximately 20 cm above the participant's mouth in 32 different circumstances (with or without coughing, with or without wearing a surgical mask, at four different flow rates of oxygenation, in a positive- or negative-pressure operating room). RESULTS: In a positive-pressure room, a surgical mask significantly decreased the aerosol counts during coughing (P = 0.0005), or during no coughing (P = 0.009), under high-flow nasal oxygenation (at 60 l.min-1). In the negative-pressure room, the aerosol count was significantly lower than in the positive-pressure room, for all the circumstances (all P < 0.001), and a surgical mask significantly decreased the aerosol counts during coughing (P = 0.047) but not during no coughing (P = 0.60). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, treating a patient in a negative-pressure room, or applying a surgical mask, during high-flow nasal oxygenation (with the flow rate of 60 l.min-1) would inhibit, but would not completely prevent, dispersion of aerosols by coughing.

Critical Damage of Lung Parenchyma Complicated with Massive Pneumothorax in COVID-19 Pneumonia.

It is already known that Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may lead to various degrees and forms of lung parenchyma damage, but some cases take a strikingly severe course that is difficult to manage. We report the case of a 62-year old male, non-obese, non-smoker, and non-diabetic, who presented with fever, chills, and shortness of breath. The infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was diagnosed by real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Although the patient had been vaccinated with 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine 7 months earlier and had no risk factors for a severe outcome, serial computed tomography (CT) scan revealed lung involvement progressively extending from an initial 30% to 40% to almost 100% 2.5 months later. The spectrum of lung lesions included at first only ground-glass opacities and some tiny emphysema bullae, but later also bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, and large emphysema bullae as post-COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae. For fear of severe evolution of superimposed bacterial infection (Clostridoides difficile enterocolits and possibly bacterial pneumonia) the administration of corticosteroids was intermittent. Massive right pneumothorax secondary to bulla rupture, possibly favored by the indispensable high flow oxygen therapy, led to respiratory failure compounded by hemodynamic instability, and ultimately to the patient's final demise. COVID-19 pneumonia may cause severe lung parenchyma damage which requires long-term supplemental oxygen therapy. Beneficial or even lifesaving as it might be, high flow oxygen therapy may nonetheless have deleterious effects too, including the development of bullae that may rupture engendering pneumothorax. Corticosteroid treatment should probably be pursued despite superimposed bacterial infection to limit the viral induced damage to lung parenchyma.

High-flow oxygen therapy versus facemask preoxygenation in anticipated difficult airway management (PREOPTI-DAM): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

Background: Difficult airway management remains a critical procedure with life-threatening adverse events. Current guidelines suggest high-flow therapy by nasal cannulae (HFNC) as a preoxygenation device in this setting. However, there is an evidence gap to support this recommendation. Methods: The PREOPTI-DAM study is an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled phase 3 trial done at Nantes University Hospital, France. Patients were aged 18-90 years with one major or two minor criteria of anticipated difficult airway management, and requiring intubation for scheduled surgery, were eligible. Patients with body mass index >35 kg/m2 were excluded. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive 4-min preoxygenation by HFNC or facemask. Randomisation was stratified according to the intubation strategy (laryngoscopic versus fiberoptic intubation). The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen desaturation ≤94% or of bag-mask ventilation during intubation. The primary and safety analyses included the intention to treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03604120) and EudraCT (2018-A00434-51). Findings: From September 4 2018 to March 31 2021, 186 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. One participant withdrew consent and 185 (99.5%) were included in the primary analysis (HFNC, N = 95; Facemask, N = 90). The incidence of the primary outcome was not significantly different between the HFNC and the facemask groups, respectively 2 (2%) versus 7 (8%); adjusted difference, -5.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), -11.8 to 0.6], P = 0.10. In the HFNC group, 76 patients (80%) versus 53 (59%) in the facemask group, reported good or excellent intubation experiences; adjusted difference 20.5 [95% CI, 8.3-32.8], P = 0.016. Comparing HFNC with facemask, severe complication occurred in 22 (23%) versus 27 (30%) patients (P = 0.29), and moderate complication in 14 (15%) versus 18 (20%) patients (P = 0.35). No death or cardiac arrest occurred during the study. Interpretation: Compared with facemask, HFNC did not significantly reduce the incidence of desaturation ≤94% or bag-mask ventilation during anticipated difficult intubation but the trial was underpowered to rule out a clinically significant benefit. Patient satisfaction was improved with HFNC. Funding: Nantes University Hospital and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare.

Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula with Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in patients with hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), respiratory rate (RR), treatment failure, exacerbation rates, adverse events and comfort evaluation. Patients and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were retrieved from inception to September 30, 2022. Eligible trials were randomized controlled trials and crossover studies comparing HFNC and COT in hypercapnic COPD patients. Continuous variables were reported as mean and standard derivation and calculated by weighted mean differences (MD), while dichotomous variables were shown as frequency and proportion and calculated by odds ratio (OR), with the 95% confidence intervals (Cl). Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results: Eight studies were included, five with acute hypercapnia and three with chronic hypercapnia. In acute hypercapnic COPD, short-term HFNC reduced PaCO2 (MD -1.55, 95% CI: -2.85 to -0.25, I² = 0%, p <0.05) and treatment failure (OR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.88, I² = 0%, p<0.05), but there were no significant differences in PaO2 (MD -0.36, 95% CI: -2.23 to 1.52, I² = 45%, p=0.71) and RR (MD -1.07, 95% CI: -2.44 to 0.29, I² = 72%, p=0.12). In chronic hypercapnic COPD, HFNC may reduce COPD exacerbation rates, but there was no advantage in improving PaCO2 (MD -1.21, 95% CI: -3.81 to 1.39, I² = 0%, p=0.36) and PaO2 (MD 2.81, 95% CI: -1.39 to 7.02, I² = 0%, p=0.19). Conclusion: Compared with COT, short-term HFNC reduced PaCO2 and the need for escalating respiratory support in acute hypercapnic COPD, whereas long-term HFNC reduced COPD exacerbations rates in chronic hypercapnia. HFNC has great potential for treating hypercapnic COPD.

Home High-Flow Therapy in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Physiological Rationale and Clinical Results.

High-flow therapy (HFT) is the administration of gas flows above 15 L/min. It is a non-invasive respiratory support that delivers heated (up to 38 °C), humidified (100% Relative Humidity, RH; 44 mg H2O/L Absolute Humidity, AH), oxygen-enriched air when necessary, through a nasal cannula or a tracheostomy interface. Over the last few years, the use of HFT in critically ill hypoxemic adults has increased. Although the clinical benefit of home high-flow therapy (HHFT) remains unclear, some research findings would support the use of HHFT in chronic respiratory diseases. The aim of this review is to describe the HFT physiological principles and summarize the published clinical findings. Finally, we will discuss the differences between hospital and home implementation, as well as the various devices available for HHFT application.

The Danish respiratory society guideline for long-term high flow nasal cannula treatment, with or without supplementary oxygen.

Introduction: Long-term High Flow Nasal Cannula (LT-HFNC), defined as High Flow Nasal Cannula treatment provided to patients with chronic pulmonary conditions during stable phases, has emerged as a home treatment in different categories of patients with chronic lung diseases in recent years. Methods: This paper summarizes the physiological effects of LT-HFNC and evaluates the clinical knowledge to date about treatment in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease, interstitial lung disease and bronchiectasis. The guideline is translated and summarized in this paper and presented unabridged as an appendix to the paper. Results: The paper describes the working process behind the Danish Respiratory Society's National guideline for treatment of stable disease, which has been written to support clinicians in both evidence-based decision making and practical issues concerning the treatment.

[The perioperative role of high-flow cannula oxygen (HFNO)]. / Place de l'oxygénothérapie nasale à haut débit en périopératoire.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNO) is commonly used during the perioperative period. Its numerous physiological benefits, satisfactory tolerance and ease of use have led to its widespread application in intensive care and post-anesthesia care units. HFNO is also used in the operating theater in multiple indications: as oxygen supplementation (associated with pressurization) prior to orotracheal intubation; in digestive and bronchial endoscopies, especially in patients at risk of hypoxemia; and in intraoperative surgery requiring spontaneous ventilation (ENT, thoracic surgery…). During the postoperative period, HFNO can be used in a curative strategy for respiratory failure or in a prophylactic strategy to prevent reintubation. In a curative approach, HFNO seems of interest following cardiac or thoracic surgery but has not been evaluated in respiratory failure subsequent to abdominal surgery, in which case noninvasive ventilation remains the gold standard. The risk of respiratory complications depends on type of surgery and on patient comorbidities. As prophylaxis, HFNO is currently preferred to conventional oxygen therapy after cardiac or thoracic surgery, especially in patients at high risk of respiratory complications. For the clinician, it is important to acknowledge the limits of HFNO and to closely monitor patients receiving HFNO, the objective being to avoid delays in intubation that could lead to increased mortality.

[The role of HFNC oxygen in pre-oxygenation prior to intubation and the practice of invasive procedures]. / Place de l'oxygénothérapie haut débit dans la pré-oxygénation pour l'intubation et la pratique des gestes invasifs.

Over recent years, High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy has been more and more extensively applied in numerous medical settings, and it is now carried out in invasive procedures such as pre-oxygenation before orotracheal intubation, often leading to complications. More generally, pre-oxygenation is aimed at maintaining the highest possible oxygen saturation for extended periods of time. With this in mind, HFNC seems as effective as standard oxygen delivery with regard to hematosis in patients with mild or moderate hypoxemia, and it presents the advantage of reducing the adverse events associated with intubation. That said, during pre-oxygenation of patients with severe hypoxemia, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is probably more effective than HFNC, especially in the prevention of respiratory events. However, in patients with little or no hypoxemia undergoing risky procedures such as bronchial endoscopy, HFNC allows better oxygen saturation than standard methods. To summarize, even though NIV remains useful in unstable patients, especially in decreasing desaturation episodes, HFNC could represent a reasonable alternative in case of poor tolerance, allowing continuous oxygenation of patients requiring digestive endoscopy or trans-esophageal ultrasound.

Análisis de la experiencia del uso de cánula nasal de alto flujo como terapéutica en neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 / Analysis of the experience of the use of high-flow nasal cannula as therapeutics in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

Introducción: Durante la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2, la cánula nasal de alto flujo (CNAF) se usó como soporte en espera de Unidad de terapia intensiva (UTI) o como alternativa a la ventilación invasiva. Objetivos: Primario: Determinar si la cánula nasal de alto flujo evita la intubación oro traqueal. Secundarios: Analizar predictores de éxito al inicio de la cánula nasal de alto flujo y análisis descriptivo de la muestra. Materiales y métodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 16 años positivos para SARS-CoV-2, atendidos en guardia y unidad de terapia intensiva, que utilizaron cánula nasal de alto flujo entre octubre de 2020 y marzo 2021. Se recolectaron datos en planillas individuales, analizadas por un profesional externo. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el trabajo 72 pacientes (de 16 a 88 años), 20 mujeres y 52 hombres. El 50 % de la muestra evitó la intubación orotraqueal. El IROX inicio grupo "éxito" vs. grupo "fracaso", p = 0,006. Comparación Irox 12 h grupo "éxito" vs. grupo "fracaso" p < 0,001. Comparación "tiempo desde ingreso a inicio de cánula nasal de alto flujo" grupo "éxito" vs. grupo "fracaso", p = 0,133. Comparación "Delta IROX" grupo "éxito" vs grupo "fracaso" p = 0,092. Conclusión: Se evitó la intubación orotraqueal en el 50 % de los casos. El IROX de inicio y el IROX a las 12 h del uso de cánula nasal de alto flujo fue estadísticamente significativo, lo que es un buen predictor del éxito en esta población. La fecha de inicio de síntomas y el uso de cánula nasal de alto flujo y el delta del IROX durante las pri meras 12 h no fue estadísticamente significativo para el éxito de la terapia. Estos datos son una herramienta útil con el objeto de generar protocolos de selección de pacientes para esta patología.

Introduction: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was used as support while waiting for the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or as an alternative to invasive ventilation. The objective of this work is the description and analysis of the use of CNAF in our population. Objectives: Primary: Determine if HFNC prevents orotracheal intubation. Secondary: Analyze predictors of success at the start of CNAF and a descriptive analysis of the sample Materials and method: Retrospective descriptive observational study. Patients over 16 years of age positive for SARS-CoV-2, treated in Guard and ICU were included. who used CNAF between October 2020 and March 2021 Data was collected in individual forms, analyzed by an external professional. Results: The study included 72 patients (16 to 88 years old), 20 women and 52 men; 50 % of the sample avoided orotracheal intubation. Start IROX, group "success" vs. group "failure" p = 0.006. Comparison Irox.12 h group "success" vs. group "failure" p < 0.001. Comparison "Time from admission to start of CNAF" group "success" vs. group "failure" p = 0.133. Comparison "Delta IROX" group "success" vs. group "failure" p = 0.092. Conclusion: HFNC avoided orotracheal intubation in the 50 % of the cases. The initial IROX and the IROX 12 hours after the use of HFNC were statistically significant, which is a good predictor of success in this population. The date of onset of symptoms and the use of FNAF and IROX delta during the first 12 hours were not statistically significant for the success of the therapy. These data are a useful tool for generating patient selection protocols for this pathology.