Gartland classification concordance of supracondylar fractures among pediatric emergency medicine physicians, radiologists, and orthopedic surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The modified Gartland classification is the most widely accepted grading method of supracondylar humeral fractures among orthopedic surgeons and is relevant to identifying fractures that may require surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the interobserver reliability of the modified Gartland classification among pediatric radiologists, pediatric orthopedic surgeons, and pediatric emergency medicine physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elbow radiographs for 100 children with supracondylar humeral fractures were retrospectively independently graded by two pediatric radiologists, two pediatric orthopedic surgeons, and two pediatric emergency medicine physicians using the modified Gartland classification. A third grader of the same subspecialty served as a tie-breaker as needed to reach consensus. Readers were blinded to one another and to the medical record. The modified Gartland grade documented in the medical record by the treating orthopedic provider was used as the reference standard. Interobserver agreement was assessed using kappa statistics. RESULTS: There was substantial interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69-0.85]) on consensus fracture grade between the three subspecialties. Similarly, when discriminating between Gartland type I and higher fracture grades, there was substantial interobserver agreement between specialties (kappa = 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66-0.89]). The grade assigned by pediatric radiologists differed from the reference standard on 15 occasions, pediatric emergency medicine differed on 19 occasions, and pediatric orthopedics differed on 9 occasions. CONCLUSION: The modified Gartland classification for supracondylar humeral fractures is reproducible among pediatric emergency medicine physicians, radiologists, and orthopedic surgeons.

The feasibility, acceptability, safety, and effects of early weight bearing in humeral fractures - a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Non-weight bearing is often recommended after humeral fractures. This review aims to summarise the extent and nature of the evidence for the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and effects of early weight bearing (EWB) in people with humeral fractures, treated operatively or non-operatively. . METHODS: Data sources identified published (PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL) and unpublished (ClinicalTrials.gov, CENTRAL, NIHR Open Research, OpenGrey) literature. Independent data extraction was conducted by two reviewers. RESULTS: 13 901 records were retrieved. Ten studies, involving 515 post-operative patients and 351 healthcare professionals, were included. EWB was found to be feasible in nine studies. There was limited evidence regarding adherence to EWB. Trauma and orthopaedic surgeons reported that EWB was acceptable. This depended on surgery type and whether it was a post-operative polytrauma case. No acceptability data was reported from patients' perspectives. Only one study reported two patients who developed unsatisfactory outcomes from excessive post-operative EWB. Positive effects of EWB were reported on disability level, pain, shoulder and elbow motion, and union. CONCLUSION: There is some evidence for the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of post-operative EWB after humeral fractures. There was limited data on the acceptability of EWB. Heterogeneous study designs, and variations in EWB protocols limit conclusions.

There is some evidence to support the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of early weight bearing following operative management of humeral fractures.Early weight bearing after some humeral fractures is acceptable to some subspecialities of orthopaedic surgeons but is not universally accepted.Rehabilitation professionals should discuss the option of early weight bearing after operative management of humeral fracture with patients and their multidisciplinary team.

Associated Factor and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Postoperative Rotational Malreduction in Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures.

Background and Objectives: Long-term outcomes of immediately postoperative rotational malreduction in the axial plane after operative treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHF) are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes and associated factors for immediately postoperative rotational malreduction of SCHF. Materials and methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 88 patients who underwent surgery for Gratland type III SCHF were enrolled between January 2012 and January 2020. Among them, 49 patients had immediately postoperative malrotational reduction (rotational malreduction group) and 39 patients had no rotational deformity (control group). To evaluate the associated factors for immediately postoperative rotational malreduction, demographic data, fracture patterns, physical examination signs, and preoperative radiological parameters were analyzed. To compare the clinical outcomes, operation time, range of motion of the elbow, time from operation to full range of motion, and Flynn criteria were evaluated. The Oxford elbow score was used to investigate long-term clinical outcomes for patients five years after operation. Results: The mean age was 5.7 ± 2.3 years and mean follow-up period was 15.7 ± 4.0 months. The rotational malreduction group had significantly more patients with oblique fracture pattern (p = 0.031) and Pucker sign (p = 0.016) and showed a significantly longer operative time (p = 0.029) than the control group. Although there was no significant difference in the range of elbow motion and the Flynn criteria, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed a longer time to recover the full range of elbow motion in the rotational malreduction group (p = 0.040). There were no significant differences in the long-term clinical outcomes assessed using the Oxford elbow score (p = 0.684). Conclusions: Oblique fracture pattern and Pucker sign may be associated with immediately postoperative rotational malreduction in the axial plane. Although patients with immediately postoperative rotational malreduction showed favorable results of long-term clinical outcomes, they required more weeks to recover the full range of elbow motion.

Proximal humeral fractures in children - controversies in decision making.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures in children are rare and usually treated non-operatively, especially in children younger than ten. The decision between operative and non-operative treatment is mostly based on age and fracture angulation. In the current literature, diverging recommendations regarding fracture angulation that is still tolerable for non-operative treatment can be found. Besides, there is no consensus on how fracture angulation should be determined. This study aimed to determine whether leading experts in pediatric trauma surgery in Germany showed agreement concerning the measurement of fracture angulation, deciding between operative and non-operative treatment, and choosing a treatment modality. METHODS: Twenty radiographs showing a proximal humeral fracture and the patient's age were assessed twice by twenty-two senior members of the "Section of Pediatric Traumatology of the German Association for Trauma Surgery". Experts determined the fracture angulation and chose between several operative and non-operative treatment modalities. The mean of individual standard deviations was calculated to estimate the accuracy of single measurements for fracture angulation. Besides Intra-Class Correlation and Fleiss' Kappa coefficients were determined. RESULTS: For fracture angulation, experts showed moderate (ICC = 0.60) interobserver and excellent (ICC = 0.90) intraobserver agreement. For the treatment decision, there was fair (Kappa = 0.38) interobserver and substantial (Kappa = 0.77) intraobserver agreement. Finally, experts preferred ESIN over K-wires for operative and a Gilchrist over a Cuff/Collar for non-operative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Firstly, there is a need for consensus among experts on how fracture angulation in PHFs in children should be reliably determined. Our data indicate that choosing one method everybody agrees to use could be more helpful than using the most sophisticated. However, the overall importance of fracture angulation should also be critically discussed. Finally, experts should agree on treatment algorithms that could translate into guidelines to standardize the care and perform reliable outcome studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Anterolateral versus anteromedial plate osteosynthesis of midshaft humeral fractures; is there a difference in the rates of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy?

PURPOSE: The anterolateral (AL) and anteromedial (AM) surfaces of the humerus are typically used for plate placement during plate osteosynthesis of midshaft humeral fractures via the anterolateral approach. The purpose of this study was to determine if a significant difference exists in the rates of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy (IRNP) following either AL or AM humeral fracture plating. The research question is stated as follows: is anteromedial plating of humeral fractures associated with lower rates of IRNP when compared with anterolateral plating? METHODS: This multicenter prospective randomized study was undertaken following ethical review and approval with eligible patients who had midshaft humeral fractures or nonunions randomized into 2 groups, viz AL plate osteosynthesis group and AM plate osteosynthesis group. Following diagnostic and preoperative evaluation, patients had open plate osteosynthesis through the anterolateral approach with plate placement according to their study groups. Post-operatively, they were assessed for IRNP while obtained data was analyzed with SPSS version 23 and inter-group differences with P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Eighty-five eligible patients participated in the study with 43 patients in Group A (AL plate osteosynthesis group) and 42 patients in Group B (AM plate osteosynthesis group). The observed inter-group differences with regard to gender distribution, mean age and clinical diagnosis; acute fracture (AF) versus nonunion were not statistically significant. Furthermore, four (9.3%) patients amongst the 43 patients in Group A (AL plate osteosynthesis group) developed IRNP while two (4.8%) patients amongst the 42 patients in Group B (AM plate osteosynthesis group) had IRNP. The inter-group difference with regard to rates of IRNP was not statistically significant (P = 0.694). CONCLUSION: This study found that (in contrast to previous studies) there was no significant difference in the rates of IRNP following either open anterolateral or anteromedial plate osteosynthesis of midshaft humeral fractures through the anterolateral approach. Orthopaedic surgeons should therefore remain cautious when obtaining consent for surgery as well as when performing internal fixation of midshaft humeral fractures to limit medicolegal disputes that may arise from IRNP.

Articular fracture of the distal humerus classified Dubberley 2b: Case report of two patients and review of the literature.

Articular fractures of the distal humerus are rare, and even rarer are fractures involving the trochlea and capitellum in a single fragment, with no associated comminution. These fractures are classified as 2a according to the Dubberley classification and are rarely described in the literature. Two cases of Dubberley 2a fractures were treated at our hospital. The first case, involving a 68-year-old patient, was treated with a medial and a lateral approach, combined with posteroanterior fixation using 3 Herbert screws. In the 2nd case, a 16-year-old male was treated with a single lateral approach, permitting fixation with two Herbert screws. One of the two screws is inserted into the bone at the edge of the cartilage, with an anteroposterior trajectory that leaves the cartilage intact. We opted mainly for posteroanterior screw fixation in subchondral bone, which is less damaging to articular cartilage and soft tissues and has already demonstrated its reliability. No associated lesions were found, and no complications were encountered. Results were excellent, with Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) scores of 95 and 100 respectively. Herbert screw fixation therefore appears to be an option of choice for these fractures, although comparative studies are needed to evaluate the different treatments available.

Primary stability in locking plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures may be increased by using an additional nail osteosynthesis in combination with locking plate osteosynthesis-A biomechanical comparison.

BACKGROUND: Stability is regarded as an important factor for proper healing and avoiding secondary dislocation in osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus. Several surgical techniques have been proposed for treatment, including intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and locking plate fixation. This study introduces a novel approach that combines both techniques and compares its primary stability with conventional methods. METHODS: The study involved 25 osteoporotic humeri with two-part fracture models, which were randomly assigned to locking-plate fixation, intramedullary nailing, or a combination of both techniques. The specimens were subjected to sinusoidal loading at 250 N in 20° abduction for 5000 cycles and then to quasi-static loading until failure. Fracture movement, failure mode, and failure load were measured and compared among the groups. FINDINGS: The groups fixated with intramedullary nailing and the groups fixated with intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation showed significantly lower fracture motion than the group using locking plate fixation only (p < 0.005) and significantly higher load to failure (p = 0.007 and p = 0.0062, respectively). There was no significant difference between the group using intramedullary nailing and the group using locking-plate fixation and intramedullary nailing in fracture movement or load-to-failure (p > 0.005). INTERPRETATION: The results indicate that locking plate fixation provides less primary stability than intramedullary nailing or the combined of both techniques. This combined approach may offer advantages as a treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures in osteoporotic bone, and specific implants should be developed to ensure optimal treatment.

Does interferential current provide additional benefit to orthopedic rehabilitation for the patients with proximal humeral fractures? A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 80% of all proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures, which can be treated with conservative treatment. This study investigated the effect of interferential current (IFC) added to orthopedic rehabilitation on shoulder function, pain, and disability in patients with PHF. METHODS: This study was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled conducted in physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic. Thirty-five patients were randomly separated into the IFC group (n = 18) and the sham group (n = 17). The orthopedic rehabilitation program was applied to all patients by the same physiotherapist three times a week for four weeks. Patients in the IFC group received the intervention for 20 minutes 3 times a week before the exercise. The same pads were performed for the sham group, but no electrical stimulation was applied. Constant-Murley score (CMS) for shoulder function, visual analog scale (VAS) activity pain, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, and paracetamol intake were recorded post-treatment, at 6 weeks and 18 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: The demographic and fracture characteristics were not different between the groups. Significant differences were observed in the IFC and sham group in intragroup comparisons of total CMS, VAS activity pain, DASH score, and paracetamol intake over time (p < 0.001). Significant improvement over time was valid for all pairwise comparisons in both groups. However, no significant differences were detected between the IFC and sham group. CONCLUSION: IFC added to orthopedic rehabilitation could not appear to be an electrotherapy modality that could potentially benefit shoulder function and disability in patients with PHF.

The Treatment of Periprosthetic Fracture Revision of the Humerus with "Bamboo Support" Structural Allograft Technique-Atrophic Non-Union of a Post-Operative Periprosthetic Fracture after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

Periprosthetic fractures are a serious complication of joint replacement surgery. With the growing prevalence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), the incidence of relatively uncommon periprosthetic humeral fractures has increased. Here, we present the unique case of a 74-year-old woman who developed atrophic non-union after plate osteosynthesis for a periprosthetic fracture associated with RTSA. Fixation failure was evident 3 months after the surgical intervention; the patient underwent a 3-month course of arm sling immobilization. However, bone resorption continued, and varus angulation of the fracture developed. In this case, surgical strategy involved the use of long proximal humerus internal locked system plate (DePuy Synthes, Paoli, PA, USA), augmented with autologous iliac bone graft and allogenic humerus structural bone graft with the "bamboo support technique", fixed with Cable System (DePuy Synthes, Paoli, PA, USA). No reports have addressed the management of failed periprosthetic fractures using allogeneic humeral strut bone grafts. This report aims to fill the gap by presenting a novel surgical technique for the management of periprosthetic fractures associated with RTSA in case of treatment failure.

Great tuberosity fixation does not affect healing and clinical outcomes in RSA performed in proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

PURPOSE: Aims of our study were to define whether the great tuberosity (GT) positioning fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after proximal humeral fracture (PHF) could predict tuberosity healing and its impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We enrolled 59 patients treated with cementless reverse shoulder arthroplasty after PHF in our institute between 2012 and 2018. The mean follow-up was 57 months (± 23.4). We divided patients into two groups according to GT positioning after fixation: Group 1 GT in contact and Group 2 GT detached at least 1 mm from humeral diaphysis. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at last follow-up. RESULTS: Overall GT healing rate was 64.4%, (Group 1 70.7%-Group 2 50%). A statistically significant difference (P = 0.047) was found in cortical thickness narrowing at one-third of stem length. We found a correlation between lateral cortical narrowing and GT fixation in non-anatomical position, but we observed no statistically significant differences about GT healing according to GT anatomical or non-anatomical fixation. No differences were found in shoulder function in patients whose tuberosity was healed or failed to heal. CONCLUSION: GT reduction is not a predictive factor for GT healing; external stress shielding, instead, seems to be decreased in patients with postoperative anatomically reduced GT. In our study, GT healing did not affect clinical outcomes or patient's satisfaction in elderly low-demanding patients.

Risk factors for osteonecrosis of the humeral head after internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the humeral head (ONHH) is a severe complication after the internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures (IFPHF). The risk factors remain controversial though many studies have reported. In this research, meta-analysis was used to evaluate which surgeon-level factors can be modified to lower the risk and we hope to provide evidence-based support for preventing ONHH. METHODS: Literature was retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for eligible studies published up to January 2023. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate. STATA 15.1 software was applied for data synthesis, sensitivity synthesis, and publication bias. RESULTS: 45 articles were published between 2000 and 2022, and 2482 patients were finally included. All articles were observational research, with 7 case-control studies and 38 cohort studies, and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) score ranged from 7 to 9. The pooled results suggested that age (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.74, P = 0.01), reduction quality (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.44, P = 0.00), fracture type (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.78, P = 0.01), surgical approach (OR: 4.06, 95% CI 1.21-13.61, P = 0.02) and fixation implant (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.34-1.33, P = 0.02) were risk factors for ONHH after IFPHF. According to sensitivity analysis, Begg (P = 0.42) and Egger (P = 0.68) tests, the results were stable and exhibited no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that age, reduction quality, fracture type, surgical approach and fixation implant were risk factors for ONHH after IFPHF, while gender, varus or valgus, timely operation, injured side, and the existence of medial support have little influence on ONHH, as they could not be considered risk factors and still need further investigations.

Endosteal strut using a hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactide mesh tube with a proximal humeral locking plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

PURPOSE: Proximal humeral fractures cause large intramedullary bone defects after humeral-head reduction. Hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactide (HA/PLLA) materials are widely used for various fractures. However, the efficacy of endosteal strut using a HA/PLLA mesh tube (ES-HA/PLLA) with a locking plate for treating proximal humeral fractures was not reported. The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of ES-HA/PLLA with a proximal humeral locking plate in proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: Seventeen patients with proximal humeral fractures treated using ES-HA/PLLA with a locking plate from November 2017 to November 2021 were evaluated. The range of motion of the shoulder and postoperative complications were assessed at the final follow-up. Radiographs were evaluated to assess bone union and loss of reduction by measuring humeral-head height (HHH) and humeral neck-shaft angle (NSA). RESULTS: The average flexion and external rotation of the shoulder at the final follow-up were 137° (range, 90-180°) and 39° (range, - 10 to 60°), respectively. All fractures were united. The average HHH and NSA just after the surgery and final follow-up were 12.5 mm and 11.6 mm and 129.9° and 127.4°, respectively. Two patients presented screw perforation of the humeral head. One patient underwent implant removal due to infection. Avascular necrosis of the humeral head was observed in one patient with arthritis mutilans. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ES-HA/PLLA with a proximal humeral locking plate resulted in bone union in all patients and prevented postoperative loss of reduction. ES-HA/PLLA is one of the treatment options for proximal humeral fractures.

Farm management and husbandry practices associated with spontaneous humeral fractures in New Zealand dairy heifers.

AIMS: To use a farm-based survey to identify characteristics of the New Zealand dairy system associated with the risk of spontaneous humeral fracture in dairy heifers. METHODS: A questionnaire was designed and made available in print and online to collect information from dairy farmers and/or veterinarians, across New Zealand, about the management and nutrition of cows from birth to first lactation. Data were collected from July 2019 to March 2020 from farms that either had recorded (case farms) or not recorded (control farms) cases of humeral fractures in dairy heifers. RESULTS: A total of 68 completed questionnaires were returned, with 35 responses from case farms and 33 responses from control farms. Twenty-six responses (38%) were from the South Island (13 case farms and 13 control farms) and 38 responses (56%) were from the North Island (20 case farms and 18 control farms). For four questionnaires (6%) farm location was not given. Adjusting for the effect of age when calves accessed pasture, case farms had increased odds of having Holstein-Friesian Jersey crossbreed cows as the predominant breed (OR = 9.7; 95% CI = 3.1-36.0; p < 0.001). Adjusting for the effect of breed, allowing calves access to pasture a week later decreased the odds of being a case farm (OR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.47-0.90; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Cows being Holstein-Friesian Jersey crossbreed was identified as a possible risk factor associated with spontaneous humeral fracture in dairy heifers in New Zealand. Given the small sample size, the likely multifactorial aetiology for humeral fractures, and the non-randomised survey, this risk factor, and the possible association between age at turn out and herd production with humeral fractures, all require further investigation.

A Rare Combined Injury in Children during Side Impact: The Possible Mechanism and Treatment Results.

OBJECTIVE: Proximal humeral fracture combined with contralateral midshaft clavicle fracture is an extremely rare injury in children. Few studies focus on the injury mechanism and treatment scheme. The aim of this study is to propose the possible mechanism of this injury and present the treatment results. METHODS: This retrospective study included children diagnosed with proximal humeral fractures combined with contralateral midshaft clavicle fractures from August 2016 to March 2019 in the corresponding author's institution. The patients received elastic stable intramedullary nails and external fixation as treatment. The radiological and clinical outcomes of treatments were evaluated using the imaging and the Constant-Murley score (CMS) in follow up. RESULTS: Twelve patients (eight males and four females) with an average age of 7.83 years old (age 5-12) were included in this research. All the patients had suffered a side impact in a road traffic accident or outdoor environment. Hypothesis about the mechanism was the proximal humerus was directly impacted at first and caused the surgical neck fracture, then the contralateral shoulder hits the solid object and the contralateral midshaft clavicle was fractured. During the average 45.2 months (range 36-57) follow-up, all the patient's fractures achieved clinical and radiological union before 14 weeks without complications. Every patient had a satisfactory score (range from 92 to 100) on the CMS criteria for both shoulders. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis about the mechanism of this combined injury in this study sounds reasonable. It highlights the need for safety-related education about using a safety seat or wearing a seat belt to parents and caregivers, so as to avoid such injury even if the treatment with external fixation (EF) and proximal humeral and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) showed good results.

Situaciones transoperatorias en pacientes pediátricos con fractura supracondílea del húmero

Introducción: Las fracturas supracondíleas del húmero en el niño, por lo general, son tratadas de manera quirúrgica, durante esa intervención se pueden presentar situaciones específicas en este tipo de enfermos. Objetivo: Actualizar y brindar información sobre algunas de las situaciones transoperatorias en pacientes con fractura supracondílea del húmero. Métodos: La búsqueda y análisis de la información se realizó en un periodo de 61 días (primero de septiembre al 31 de octubre de 2022) y se emplearon palabras de búsqueda relacionadas con la investigación. A partir de la información obtenida, se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de un total de 245 artículos publicados en las bases de datos: PubMed, Hinari, SciELO y Medline, mediante el gestor de búsqueda y administrador de referencias EndNote, de ellos, se utilizaron 29 citas seleccionadas para realizar la revisión, 28 de los últimos cinco años. Resultados: Se hace referencia a cuatro de las situaciones transoperatorias más frecuentes en este tipo de fractura. Se mencionan la conminución de la pared medial, como identificar esta situación y su conducta. En relación a las lesiones asociadas, se recomienda primero estabilizar el antebrazo y luego la fractura supracondílea. Para las fracturas inestables en flexión se recomienda la técnica a emplear. Por su parte, la conversión de la reducción cerrada a abierta está justificada en ciertas circunstancias que de forma detallada se describen en el trabajo. Conclusiones: Las fracturas supracondíleas del húmero en el niño son tratadas en su mayoría mediante tratamiento quirúrgico. Durante el transoperatorio se pueden presentar situaciones para las cuales el médico tratante debe estar preparado.

Introduction: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are generally treated surgically, during surgery intervention may occur specific situations in this type of patient. Objective: To update and provide information on some of the intraoperative situations in patients with supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Methods: The search and analysis of the information was carried out in a period of 61 days (September 1st to October 31st, 2022) and search words related to the investigation were used. Based on the information obtained, a bibliographic review of a total of 245 articles published in the PubMed, Hinari, SciELO and Medline databases was carried out using the EndNote search manager and reference administrator, of which 29 selected citations were used to carry out the review, 28 of the last five years. Results: Reference is made to four of the most frequent intraoperative situations in this type of fracture. Comminution of the medial wall, how to identify this situation and its behavior are mentioned. In relation to associated injuries, it is recommended to first stabilize the forearm and then the supracondylar fracture. For unstable fractures in flexion, the technique to be used is recommended. For its part, the conversion from closed to open reduction is justified in certain circumstances that are described in the article. Conclusions: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are mostly treated by surgical treatment. During the trans-operative period situations may arise for which the treating physician must be prepared.

Fijación externa en pacientes pediátricos con fracturas supracondíleas del húmero

Introducción: Las fracturas supracondíleas del húmero en el niño son por lo general de tratamiento quirúrgico, mediante reducción cerrada o abierta asociada a la colocación de alambres. Por su parte, la fijación externa es una opción aceptada en ciertas circunstancias. Objetivo: Actualizar sobre el uso de la fijación externa en pacientes con fractura supracondílea del húmero en el niño. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda y análisis de la información en un periodo de 61 días (primero de junio al 31 de julio de 2023) y se emplearon las siguientes palabras: pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures AND external fixation, external fixation AND elbow, complex fractures AND pediatric supracondylar. A partir de la información obtenida se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de un total de 177 artículos publicados en las bases de datos PubMed, Hinari, SciELO y Medline mediante el gestor de búsqueda y administrador de referencias EndNote. De ellos, se utilizaron 34 citas seleccionadas para realizar la revisión, 32 de los últimos cinco años. Resultados: Se hizo referencia a las indicaciones y contraindicaciones, además de las ventajas de la fijación externa. Se mencionaron las principales diferencias entre la fijación con alambres de Kirschner y la fijación externa. Se expuso la técnica en cinco pasos. Se plasmaron los cuidados posoperatorios, complicaciones y comentarios sobre los resultados. Conclusiones: La fijación externa constituye una modalidad de tratamiento efectiva para pacientes pediátricos con patrones de fractura complejos. Es una técnica factible de realizar y reproducir. Los resultados son iguales o superiores al ser comparados con las otras modalidades quirúrgicas.

Introduction: Supracondylar humerus fractures in children are generally treated surgically, through closed or open reduction associated with placement of the wires. For its part, external fixation is an accepted option in certain circumstances. Objective: To update on the use of external fixation in patients with supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children. Methods: The search and analysis of the information was carried out in a period of 61 days (June 1st to July 31st, 2023) and the following words were used: pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures AND external fixation, external fixation AND elbow, complex fractures AND pediatric supracondylar. Based on the information obtained, a bibliographic review of a total of 177 articles published in the PubMed, Hinari, SciELO and Medline databases was carried out using the EndNote search engine and reference administrator. Of these, 34 selected citations were used to carry out the review, 32 of the last five years. Results: References are made to the indications and contraindications, in addition to the advantages of external fixation. The main differences between Kirschner wire fixation and external fixation are mentioned. The technique is exposed in five steps. Postoperative care, complications and comments on the results are reflected. Conclusions: External fixation is an effective treatment modality for pediatric patients with complex fracture patterns. It is a feasible technique to perform and reproduce. The results are equal or superior when compared with other surgical modalities.

Kirschner wire reconstruction of medial and lateral column periosteal hinge in the treatment of multidirectionally unstable supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effect of reconstruction of internal and lateral column periosteal hinge-assisted treatment with Kirschner wire and internal fixation with Kirschner wire in the treatment of multidirectional unstable supracondylar fractures of humerus in children. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 48 patients (31 male, 17 female; mean age: 6.7 ± 2.4 years old) with multidirectionally unstable supracondylar fractures of the humerus treated in our Hospital from August 2020 to August 2022. Twenty-five cases were treated with Kirschner wire reconstruction of the internal and lateral column periosteal hinge assisted by closed reduction and Kirschner wire internal fixation (study group). Twenty-three cases were treated with closed reduction and Kirschner wire internal fixation (control group). The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, percentage of patients who underwent open reduction after failure of closed reduction, fracture healing time, Baumann angle (BA), shaft-condylar angle (SCA), range of motion (ROM), and Flynn score of elbow at the last follow-up were compared between two groups. Complications such as infection and irritation of Kirschner wire tail were observed in two groups 2 months after the operation. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 10-22 months ([13.85 ± 2.89] months). The average operation time of the control group was 82.1 min, which was significantly longer than that of the study group 32.3 min (P < 0.05). The number of intraoperative fluoroscopy (29.4 ± 9.2) in the control group was significantly higher than that in the study group (15.2 ± 6.3) (P < 0.05). The incision rate of the control group was 17% while that of the study group was 0 (P < 0.05). According to Flynn score, the excellent and good rate of the elbow joint in the control group was 86.9% (20/23). The excellent and good rate of the elbow joint in the study group was 92.0% (23/25) (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in fracture healing time, BA, SCA, and ROM between the two groups (P > 0.05). No infection or Kirschner wire tail irritation occurred in the two groups during the 2-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of internal and lateral periosteal hinges with Kirscher wire has similar effects to closed reduction and Kirschner wire fixation in the treatment of multidirectionally unstable supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children, but it can shorten the operation time and reduce intraoperative fluoroscopy times and incision rate.

The Arterial Axis Lesions in Proximal Humeral Fractures-Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: This comprehensive review delves into the nuanced domain of arterial axis lesions associated with proximal humeral fractures, elucidating the intricate interplay between fracture patterns and vascular compromise. Proximal humeral fractures, a common orthopedic occurrence, often present challenges beyond the skeletal realm, necessitating a profound understanding of the vascular implications. METHODS: The study synthesizes the existing literature, presenting a collective analysis of documented cases and their respective clinical outcomes. The spectrum of arterial axis lesions, from subtle vascular compromise to overt ischemic events, is systematically examined, highlighting the varied clinical manifestations encountered in proximal humeral fractures. Diagnostic modalities, including advanced imaging techniques such as angiography and Doppler ultrasound, are scrutinized for their efficacy in identifying arterial axis lesions promptly. The review emphasizes the critical role of early and accurate diagnosis in mitigating the potential sequelae associated with vascular compromise, thereby underscoring the importance of a vigilant clinical approach. RESULTS: Therapeutic strategies, ranging from conservative management to surgical interventions, are critically evaluated in the context of existing evidence. The evolving landscape of endovascular interventions and their applicability in addressing arterial axis lesions specific to proximal humeral fractures is explored, providing valuable insights for clinicians navigating the therapeutic decision-making process. Furthermore, the review addresses gaps in current knowledge and proposes avenues for future research, emphasizing the need for tailored, evidence-based guidelines in the management of arterial axis lesions in proximal humeral fractures. By consolidating current understanding and pointing towards areas warranting further exploration, this review contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding the intricacies of vascular complications in orthopedic trauma. CONCLUSIONS: this comprehensive review provides a synthesized overview of arterial axis lesions in proximal humeral fractures, offering a valuable resource for clinicians, researchers, and educators alike. The findings underscore the multifaceted nature of these lesions and advocate for a holistic, patient-centered approach to their management.

Adjunctive intraosseous wiring fixation technique for the comminuted distal humeral fractures.

Distal humeral fractures are among the most challenging injuries to treat. Although precise repair of the articular surface is essential during surgery, accurate reconstruction of the metaphysis contributes to the overall stability of the fracture construct. The intraosseous wiring technique has been used for small-fragment fractures. However, its efficacy as an adjunct for distal humerus fixation has yet to be thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to demonstrate the applicability of this technique to comminuted, distal humeral fractures. In this retrospective case series, we describe 6 cases of intra-articular distal humerus fractures treated with this technique, followed by dual plating. We observed successful bone union in all patients, with the Mayo Elbow Performance Scores indicating "good" to "excellent" clinical outcomes for this procedure at the final follow-up. We believe that this intraosseous wiring technique should be an integral part of the toolbox of every surgeon because it is a relatively simple and highly effective procedure that requires no special instrument and can be used on various types of fractures.

Biomechanical evaluation of novel intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.

Purpose: A novel intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation method was introduced, which achieved good clinical results in complex proximal humeral fractures; however, evidence of its comparability with traditional fixation is lacking. This biomechanical study aimed to compare it with traditional fixation devices in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures. Methods: Three-part proximal humeral fractures with osteopenia were created on 12 pairs of fresh frozen humerus specimens and allocated to three groups: 1) lateral locking plate, 2) intramedullary nail, and 3) intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation. The specimens were loaded to simulate the force at 25° abduction. Thereafter, an axial stiffness test and a compound cyclic load to failure test were applied. Structural stiffness, number of cycles loaded to failure, and relative displacement values at predetermined measurement points were recorded using a testing machine and a synchronized 3D video tracking system. Results: In terms of initial stiffness and the number of cycles loaded to failure, the intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation group showed notable improvements compared to the other groups (p <0.017). The mean relative displacement value of measurement points in the intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation group was smaller than that in the other two groups. However, there was no significant difference until 10,000 cycles. The mean relative displacement of the intramedullary nail group (3.136 mm) exceeded 3 mm at 7,500 cycles of loading. Conclusion: In this test model, axial fixation can provide better mechanical stability than non-axial fixation. The intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation is better able to prevent the varus collapse for elderly proximal humeral fractures with posteromedial comminution.