Indigenous Identity and Household Food Insecurity are Associated with Poor Health Outcomes in Canada.

Purpose: To examine whether Indigenous identity and food insecurity combined were associated with self-reported poor health.Methods: Data from the 2015-2016 Canadian Community Health Survey and multiple logistic regression were employed to evaluate the association between Indigenous identity, household food insecurity, and health outcomes, adjusted for individual and household covariates. The Alexander Research Committee in Alexander First Nation (Treaty 6) reviewed the manuscript and commented on the interpretation of study findings.Results: Data were from 59082 adults (3756 Indigenous). The prevalence of household food insecurity was 26.3% for Indigenous adults and 9.8% for non-Indigenous adults (weighted to the Canadian population). Food-secure Indigenous adults, food-insecure non-Indigenous adults, and food-insecure Indigenous adults had significantly (p < 0.001) greater odds of poor health outcomes than food-secure non-Indigenous adults (referent group). Food-insecure Indigenous adults had 1.96 [95% CI:1.53,2.52], 3.73 [95% CI: 2.95,4.72], 3.00 [95% CI:2.37,3.79], and 3.94 [95% CI:3.02,5.14] greater odds of a chronic health condition, a chronic mental health disorder, poor general health, and poor mental health, respectively, compared to food-secure non-Indigenous adults.Conclusions: Health policy decisions and programs should focus on food security initiatives for all Canadians, including addressing the unique challenges of Indigenous communities, irrespective of their food security status.

Immigrant, Refugee, and Indigenous Canadians' Experiences With Virtual Health Care Services: Rapid Review.

BACKGROUND: The remote, dispersed, and multicultural population of Canada presents unique challenges for health care services. Currently, virtual care solutions are being offered as an innovative solution to improve access to care. OBJECTIVE: Given the inequities in health care access faced by immigrant, refugee, and Indigenous Canadians, this review aimed to summarize information obtained from original research regarding these people's experiences with virtual care services in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a rapid review following published recommendations. MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched for studies relating to virtual care and Canadian immigrants, refugees, or Indigenous peoples. Peer-reviewed articles of any type were included so long as they included information on the experiences of virtual care service delivery in Canada among the abovementioned groups. RESULTS: This review demonstrates an extreme paucity of evidence examining the experiences of immigrant, refugee, and Indigenous groups with virtual care in Canada. Of the 694 publications screened, 8 were included in this review. A total of 2 studies focused on immigrants and refugees in Canada, with the remaining studies focusing on Indigenous communities. Results demonstrate that virtual care is generally accepted within these communities; however, cultural appropriateness or safety and inequitable access to wireless services in certain communities were among the most cited barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Little evidence exists outlining immigrants', refugees', and Indigenous peoples' perspectives on the landscape of virtual care in Canada. The development of virtual care programming should take into consideration the barriers, facilitators, and recommendations outlined in this review to improve equitable access. Further, developers should consult with local community members to ensure the appropriateness of services for immigrant, refugee, and Indigenous communities in Canada.

Exploring community perspectives on the impacts of COVID-19 on food security and food sovereignty in Nunavut communities.

BACKGROUND: In Nunavut, where 70% of children are food insecure, many households rely on school breakfast or community food programmes for nourishment. The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting policies to reduce the spread of the disease have the potential to exacerbate existing issues, including increasing food insecurity in households. Funding programmes were implemented to limit the impact of public-health measures on household and community food security. The overall effects of the actions are not yet understood. METHODS: This project used a qualitative approach to examine the determinants of food security and sovereignty and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic policy responses on these determinants in Arviat and Iqaluit. Narrative analysis applied within a relational epistemology was used to describe the experiences of community members in Iqaluit and Arviat during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Seven participants were interviewed in Iqaluit (n=3) and Arviat (n=4). Key themes included the importance of decolonisation for food sovereignty, the importance of food sharing to communities and the resilience of communities during COVID-19. Community members wished to see greater support and strengthening of the country (locally harvested) food economy to increase knowledge of food and harvesting skill, and for communities to find ways to reach residents who may fall through the cracks during times of need or crisis. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the first to document Nunavummiut experiences and perspectives of food security and sovereignty in Arviat and Iqaluit during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fair compensation and the affective costs for indigenous doulas in Canada: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: In Canada, Indigenous doulas, or birth workers, who provide continuous, culturally appropriate perinatal support to Indigenous families, build on a long history of Indigenous birth work to provide accessible care to their underserviced communities, but there is little research on how these doulas organize and administer their services. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2020 with five participants who each represented an Indigenous doula collective in Canada. One interview was conducted in person while the remaining four were conducted over Zoom due to COVID-19. Participants were selected through Internet searches and purposive sampling. Interview transcripts were approved by participants and subsequently coded by the entire research team to identify key themes. RESULTS: One of the five emergent themes in these responses is the issue of fair compensation, which includes two sub-themes: the need for fair payment models and the high cost of affective labour in the context of cultural responsibility and racial discrimination. DISCUSSION: Specifically, participants discuss the challenges and limitations of providing high quality care to families with complex needs and who cannot afford to pay for their services while ensuring that they are fairly compensated for their labour. An additional tension arises from these doulas' sense of cultural responsibility to support their kinship networks during one of the most sacred and vulnerable times in their lives within a colonial context of racism and a Western capitalist economy that financializes and medicalizes birth. CONCLUSION: These Indigenous birth workers regularly expend more affective labour than mainstream non-racialized counterparts yet are often paid less than a living wage. Though there are community-based doula models across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden that serve underrepresented communities, further research needs to be conducted in the Canadian context to determine an equitable, sustainable pay model for community-based Indigenous doulas that is accessible for all Indigenous families.

The role of Indigenous Health Workers in ear health screening programs for Indigenous children: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the involvement of Indigenous Health Workers within ear health screening programs for Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, the US and New Zealand. METHODS: Peer-reviewed and grey literature sources were systematically searched to identify evidence. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the scoping review extension of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Forty pieces of evidence were included in this review. While almost all included studies identified the critical role of Indigenous Health Workers in ear and hearing health, Indigenous leadership and involvement in research projects and service delivery varied significantly and none of the included studies reported Indigenous health worker perspectives. Approximately half of the authorship teams had at least one Indigenous author. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need for Indigenous leadership in ear and hearing health research and programming. Specialist teams involved in health service delivery and research need to enable this transition by understanding and privileging Indigenous leadership and investing in appropriate training for non-Indigenous specialists providing care in Indigenous health contexts. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: These findings are discussed in terms of opportunities to improve Indigenous ear and hearing health research and programming.

Refractive error, risk of amblyopia and eye care services utilisation among Nunavik Inuit in Northern Canada.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nunavik Inuit patients, in Northern Canada, have a significant burden of refractive error. The frequency at which they access eye care is insufficient. This exposes children of this population to a substantial risk of refractive amblyopia. BACKGROUND: No data are available on eye health and services among Nunavik Inuit in Quebec, Canada. This study aims to describe the prevalence of ametropias, risk of refractive amblyopia, and eye health services uptake amongst a sample of Nunavik Inuit. METHODS: Retrospective cohort using data from electronic records of the sole government-contracted eye team travelling to all 14 Nunavik villages, from 2006 to 2018. RESULTS: Some 26,541 examinations were analysed, with data from 6,341 patients (median age 27 years (IQR 30); 32% aged under 19 years; 60.3% female) representing 48% of the census population. Population weighted prevalence of ametropias was myopia 46.5% (95% CI 45.3 - 47.6), hyperopia 17.1% (95% CI 16.2 - 18.1), astigmatism 39.6% (95% CI 38.4 - 40.8) and presbyopia 30.0% (95% CI 28.9 - 31.0). Some 5.9% of patients aged 0-9 years present a risk of refractive amblyopia. Mean frequency of examinations for all ages was once per 4 years (95% CI 4.0 - 4.0) and for children aged 5 - 19 years, frequency was once per 4.8 years (95% CI 4.8 - 5.0). In 2018, 74% of patients who were prescribed spectacles purchased them, with a median time of procurement of 21 days (IQR 247, skewness 2.7). CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of ametropias amongst the clinical population of Nunavik Inuit. Most patients needing spectacles obtain them within a few weeks. Frequency of eye health services is insufficient to meet recommended guidelines, especially in children, for whom the risk of refractive amblyopia is pervasive.

Renal cell carcinoma in the Canadian Indigenous population.

Background: Diagnosis and treatment of renal cell carcinoma (rcc) might be different in Indigenous Canadians than in non-Indigenous Canadians. In this cohort study, we compared rcc presentation and treatments in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians. Methods: Patients registered in the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System treated at 16 institutions between 2011 and 2018 were included. Baseline patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were compared between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians. The primary objective was to determine if differences in rcc stage at diagnosis were evident between the groups. The secondary objective was to determine if treatments and outcomes were different between the groups. Results: During the study period, 105 of the 4529 registered patients self-identified as Indigenous. Those patients were significantly younger at the time of clinical diagnosis (57.9 ± 11.3 years vs. 62.0 ± 12.1 years, p = 0.0006) and had a family history prevalence of rcc that was double the prevalence in the non-Indigenous patients (14% vs. 7%, p = 0.004). Clinical stage at diagnosis was similar in the two groups (p = 0.61). The disease was metastatic at presentation in 11 Indigenous Canadians (10%) and in 355 non-Indigenous Canadians (8%). Comorbid conditions that could affect the management of rcc-such as obesity, renal disease, diabetes mellitus, and smoking-were more common in Indigenous Canadians (p < 0.05). Indigenous Canadians experienced a lower rate of active surveillance (p = 0.01). Treatments and median time to treatments were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: Compared with their non-Indigenous counterparts, Indigenous Canadian patients with rcc are diagnosed at an earlier age and at a similar clinical stage. Despite higher baseline comorbid conditions, clinical outcomes are not worse for Indigenous Canadians than for non-Indigenous Canadians.

Remote Dwelling Location Is a Risk Factor for CKD Among Indigenous Canadians.

INTRODUCTION: Rural and remote indigenous individuals have a high burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) when compared to the general population. However, it has not been previously explored how these rates compare to urban-dwelling indigenous populations. METHODS: In a recent cross-sectional screening study, 1346 adults 18 to 80 years of age were screened for CKD and diabetes across 11 communities in rural and remote areas in Manitoba, Canada, as part of the First Nations Community Based Screening to Improve Kidney Health and Prevent Dialysis (FINISHED) program. An additional 284 Indigenous adults who resided in low-income areas in the city of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada were screened as part of the NorWest Mobile Diabetes and Kidney Disease Screening and Intervention Project. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that a gradient of CKD and diabetes prevalence exists for Indigenous individuals living in different geographic areas. Compared to urban-dwelling Indigenous individuals, rural-dwelling individuals had more than a 2-fold (2.1, 95% CI = 1.4-3.1) increase in diabetes whereas remote-dwelling individuals had a 4-fold (4.1, 95% CI = 2.8-6.0) increase, and more than a 3-fold (3.1, 95% CI = 2.2-4.5) increase in CKD prevalence. CONCLUSION: Although these results highlight the relative importance of geography in determining the prevalence of diabetes and CKD in Indigenous Canadians, geography is but an important surrogate of other determinants, such as poverty and access to care.