Interrupções e distrações durante a preparação e administração de medicamentos de alto risco: Estudo transversal / Interruptions and distractions during the preparation and administration of high-risk medications: A cross-sectional study / Distracciones e interrupciones durante la preparación y administración de medicamentos de alto riesgo: Estudio transversal

Resumo Enquadramento: Estudos indicam que as interrupções contribuem para erros clínicos e falhas em procedimentos. Objetivo: Analisar as interrupções vivenciadas pelos enfermeiros durante a preparação e administração de medicamentos de alto risco. Metodologia: Foi realizado um estudo transversal numa unidade de cuidados intensivos e numa unidade de internamento. As interrupções vivenciadas pelos enfermeiros durante o processo de medicação foram observadas com a ajuda de duas checklists. A amostra foi selecionada por conveniência em abril e maio de 2019. Os dados quantitativos foram analisados através de estatística descritiva no programa IBM SPSS Statistics, versão 24.0, enquanto os dados qualitativos foram tratados por meio da análise de conteúdo. Resultados: Observaram-se 137 interrupções em 193 processos de medicação. A maioria das interrupções foi iniciada por outros membros da equipa de cuidados de saúde por meio de conversas. Estas interrupções foram maioritariamente prejudiciais e ocorreram durante a fase de preparação. A estratégia multitarefa foi utilizada para as gerir. Conclusão: As interrupções ocorridas durante o processo de medicação eram maioritariamente associadas com comunicações profissionais e sociais. A sua relevância diferiu consoante a fase do processo.

Abstract Background: Interruptions have been reported to contribute to clinical errors and procedural failures. Objective: To analyze the interruptions experienced by nurses during the preparation and administration of high-risk medications. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted in an intensive care and inpatient unit. The interruptions experienced by nurses during the medication process were observed through two checklists. The sample was selected by convenience in April-May 2019. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze quantitative data in IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 24.0, while content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. Results: In 193 medication processes, there were 137 interruptions. Other members of the healthcare team initiated most interruptions through conversations. These interruptions were mostly negative and occurred during the preparation phase. The multitasking strategy was used to manage them. Conclusion: Interruptions during the medication process were primarily associated with professional and social communications. The impact of these interruptions varied depending on the phase of the process.

Resumen Marco contextual: Se ha reportado la participación de distracciones en errores clínicos y fallos de procedimiento. Objetivo: Analizar las distracciones del personal de enfermería durante la preparación y administración de fármacos de alto riesgo. Metodología: Estudio transversal desarrollado en una unidad de cuidados intensivos y una unidad de hospitalización. Se observaron distracciones del personal de enfermería durante el proceso de medicación a través de dos listas de control. La muestra fue seleccionada por conveniencia (abril-mayo 2019). Los datos cuantitativos se analizaron mediante estadística descriptiva (IBM SPSS Statistics, versión 24.0). Los datos cualitativos se analizaron mediante análisis de contenido. Resultados: Hubo 137 distracciones en 193 procesos de medicación. La mayoría de las distracciones fueron iniciadas por otros miembros del equipo sanitario a través de conversaciones. La mayoría se produjeron en la fase de preparación y fueron negativas y se gestionaron mediante la estrategia multitarea. Conclusión: Las distracciones durante el proceso de medicación se referían principalmente a las comunicaciones profesionales y sociales. La importancia de esas distracciones variaba en función de la fase del proceso.

Early Neonatal Mortality and Predictors in Newborns Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Public Hospitals in Hadiya Zone, Central Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background. Despite numerous life-saving measures, neonatal mortality remains high. This research aims to investigate the incidence and predictors of early neonatal mortality among newborns admitted to intensive care units in public hospitals in Hadiya Zone, Ethiopia. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 689 neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Cox proportional hazard regression by STATA was used. Results. This study followed for 3439 person-days found an incidence rate of 16.9 deaths per 1000 person-days. Birth weight [AHR = 4.4, 95% CI; 1.29, 14.94], APGAR score at the fifth minute 4 to 6 [AHR = 0.42, 95% CI; 0.2, 0.87], hypoglycemia [AHR = 8.1, 95% CI; 2.17, 30.43], no treated with oxygen [AHR = 2.6, 95% CI; 1.1, 5.9], and obstetric complications [AHR = 0.41, 95% CI; 0.18, 0.93] predicted early neonatal mortality. Conclusion. The study revealed a high neonatal mortality rate, necessitating increased focus on oxygen treatment for newborns and improved early diagnosis and treatment of obstetric complications.

Clinical Characteristics and Mortality of Intensive Care Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage and COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, many studies have reported severe neurologic effects of the infection on the brain. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a particular pathology that can result in these devastating neurologic effects. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of our study is to investigate the possible difference in the clinical and laboratory characteristics of ICH between patients with positive COVID-19 tests and those with negative tests. The potential effect of this difference on the prognosis of the patients during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a secondary aim of the study. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort review, our data were collected from the electronic medical database of the Benghazi Medical Center (BMC) for the period from January 2021 to June 2022. We depended mainly on the admission paper information documented by emergency doctors, and mortality was measured depending on the clinical status after discharge from the ICU. RESULTS: This study included a sample of 72 patients, 34 patients (47.2%) were considered COVID-19 positive, and 38 patients (52.8%) were COVID-19 negative. The difference between groups was significant in ICH score ≥3 (higher in positive patients), INR (lower in positive patients), the incidence of new-onset hypertension (higher in positive patients), location of hematoma (infratentorial in positive patients), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) extension (more in positive patients). Also, COVID-19 was significantly associated with ICH score ≥3 (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.2 - 18.6, p = 0.03, R2 = 0.16), INR (𝛃 = 0.35, 95% CI 0.09 - 0.62, p < 0.003, R2 = 0.136), risk of ventilation (OR 14.1, 95% CI 3.5 - 56.9, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.26), hydrocephalus (OR 9.41, 95% CI 2.72 - 32.5, p = 0.001, R2 = 0.19), infratentorial location (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1 - 12.5, p = 0.04, R2 = 0.14), IVH extension (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2 - 10.4, p = 0.03, R2 = 0.09), new-onset hypertension (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.5 - 11.9, p = 0.007, R2 = 0.10), and mortality (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.6 - 15.3, p = 0.04, R2 = 0.15). The difference in survivability between groups was statistically insignificant (X2 = 0.41, log-rank, P = 0.53). CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates, with sufficient evidence, that COVID-19 infection causes a significant change in some critical baseline characteristics like INR values, location, and IVH extension that influence the prognosis of ICH in ICU patients.

The effectiveness of nirsevimab in reducing the burden of disease due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection over time in the Madrid region (Spain): a prospective population-based cohort study.

Introduction: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality from lower respiratory tract infections in children under 5 years of age worldwide. Given that, the objective of this study was estimate the effectiveness of nirsevimab (a single-dose, long-acting, human recombinant monoclonal antibody against RSV) over time for the prevention of respiratory episodes treated at different levels of care. Methods: A prospective and dynamic population-based cohort study was performed including infants born between April 1 and December 31, 2023, in the Madrid region who resided there during the follow-up period from October 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024. Infants were considered immunized from the day after receiving one dose (50 or 100 mg) of nirsevimab or nonimmunized individuals if they did not receive any dose. Results: There were 4,100 episodes of primary care, 1,954 hospital emergencies, and 509 admissions, 82 of which required intensive care in the 33,859 participants analyzed. The adjusted effectiveness of nirsevimab in preventing hospitalization due to RSV infection was 93.6% (95% CI: 89.7 to 96.1) at 30 days and 87.6% (95% CI: 67.7 to 95.3) at 150 days. The number needed to treat to prevent one hospitalization were 314.19 (95% CI: 306.22 to 327.99) at 30 days and 24.30 (95% CI: 22.31 to 31.61) at 150 days. The adjusted effectiveness of nirsevimab in avoiding admission to an intensive care unit was 94.4% (95% CI: 87.3 to 97.5) at 30 days and 92.1% (95% CI: 64.0 to 98.3) at 90 days. The adjusted effectiveness of nirsevimab for avoiding primary care consultations and hospital emergency visits was lower. Discussion: Immunization with nirsevimab is an effective measure for reducing the burden of care related to RSV at all levels of care albeit it decreases throughout follow-up. At 150 days it remained high for preventing hospital admissions. Other articles already published have also demonstrated high effectiveness although with preliminary results, short follow-up periods and wide confidence intervals. None have detected a decrease in effectiveness over time. These results can be quite useful in individual infant prevention and in the design of immunization campaigns.

Impact of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease on coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have revealed a link between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), making understanding the relationship between these two conditions an absolute requirement. AIM: To provide a qualitative synthesis on the currently present data evaluating COVID-19 and NAFLD. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the guidelines provided by preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and the questionnaire utilized the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework. The search strategy was run on three separate databases, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central, which were systematically searched from inception until March 2024 to select all relevant studies. In addition, ClinicalTrials.gov, Medrxiv.org, and Google Scholar were searched to identify grey literature. RESULTS: After retrieval of 11 studies, a total of 39282 patients data were pooled. Mortality was found in 11.5% and 9.4% of people in NAFLD and non-NAFLD groups. In all, 23.2% of NAFLD patients and 22% of non-NAFLD admissions diagnosed with COVID-19 were admitted to the intensive care unit, with days of stay varying. Ventilatory support ranged from 5% to 40.5% in the NAFLD cohort and from 3.1% to 20% in the non-NAFLD cohort. The incidence of acute liver injury showed significance. Clinical improvement on days 7 and 14 between the two classifications was significant. Hospitalization stay ranged from 9.6 days to 18.8 days and 7.3 days to 16.4 days in the aforementioned cohorts respectively, with 73.3% and 76.3% of patients being discharged. Readmission rates varied. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes except mortality consistently showed a worsening trend in patients with NAFLD and concomitant COVID-19. Further research in conducting prospective longitudinal studies is essential for a more powerful conclusion.

Low incidence of deep vein thrombosis in critically ill medical patients in Thais: a prospective study.

Background: Critically ill medical patients face a heightened risk of developing venous thromboembolism. In Thailand, routine thromboprophylaxis is not employed. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) has not been elucidated in the Thai population. Objectives: The aims were to evaluate the incidence of DVT and identify associated risk factors in critically ill medical patients. Methods: A single-center, prospective cohort study was conducted from 2019 to 2020. Consecutive patients underwent screening for proximal DVT by duplex ultrasound of both legs. Results: A total of 200 patients were enrolled, with 115 being male (57%). The mean (SD) age was 66.5 (16.4) years. The mean (SD) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 27 (8). The cumulative incidence of DVT over 5 days was 7% (95% CI, 3.4%-10.6%). No clinically or radiologically diagnosed pulmonary embolism occurred in patients with DVT. No independent risk factor associated with DVT was identified. Hospital mortality in those with and those without DVT was 42.9% and 32.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the length of ICU or hospital stay or inpatient mortality between those with and those without DVT. Conclusion: Without thromboprophylaxis, the incidence of DVT in the Thai population remains low. A strategy of screening ultrasound 5 to 7 days after admission to the ICU may be a suitable alternative to anticoagulant prophylaxis in critically ill Thai patients without symptoms of venous thromboembolism.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in adult patients: Comparing COVID-19- and non-COVID-19-associated respiratory failure.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a vital intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet its efficacy with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. This study compared the long-term mortality rates of patients receiving ECMO for COVID-19 with those experiencing other respiratory disease-associated ARDS. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adults with ARDS receiving ECMO for respiratory disease (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19) based on information collected from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea from February 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6 months and 1 year post-ECMO initiation. RESULTS: Data from 3094 patients with COVID-19 (N = 1095) and non-COVID-19 respiratory disease-associated ARDS (N = 1999) who received ECMO support were analyzed. Despite a higher Charlson Comorbidity index in the non-COVID group, patients with COVID-19 had higher cumulative mortality rates at 6 months and 1 year post-ECMO initiation compared to those with non-COVID-19 respiratory diseases, after adjusting for confounders. Patients with COVID-19 also experienced longer intensive care unit stays, higher hospitalization costs, longer ECMO and mechanical ventilation durations, and lower intensity coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COVID-19 requiring ECMO showed higher mortality rates, possibly due to its distinct long-lasting and potentially fatal consequences compared to other respiratory illnesses.

Innovate and renovate: Environmental intensive care unit design.

This article describes the reallocation of space and construction of a new adult shock trauma intensive care unit implementing methods to mitigate the environmental impact. The environmental burden was reduced through innovative reallocation of space and diversity of lighting sources. Circular economy principles were implemented which enabled much of the infrastructure materials to be reused. Collaboration among interdisciplinary health care teams, such as described in this article, helped to ensure expertise was shared so that the environmental impact was lessened. This article provides insight into innovative methods to mitigate the carbon footprint of a critical care renovation project.

Effect of early multi-professional mobilization on quality indicators of intensive care in a less economically developed country: an action on "Rehabilitation 2030" in Brazil: Effects of early mobilization in Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of implementing early multi-professional mobilization on quality indicators of intensive care in Brazil. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A Brazilian educational and research-intensive care unit (ICU). PARTICIPANTS: 1047 patients hospitalized from May 2016 to April 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of early multi-professional mobilization by the MobilizAÇÃO Program (MAP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical, ventilation and safety quality indicators, and physical function before (pre-program period) and after (post-program period) the MAP. RESULTS: There was a reduction in sedation time (4 vs. 1 day), hospital stay (21 vs. 14 days) and ICU stay (14 vs. 7 days), mechanical ventilation (8 vs. 4 days), hospital death rate (46 vs. 26%) (p<0.001) and ICU readmission (21 vs. 16%; p=0.030) from pre to post MAP. Successful weaning (42 vs. 55%) and discharge rate (50 vs. 71%) (p <0.001) increased after MAP. No differences were found to safety quality indicators between periods. After MAP, complex physical functions assessed by the Manchester Mobility Score (MMS) were more frequent. The in-bed intervention was a predictor for readmission (p=0.009; R²=0.689) and death (p=0.035; R²=0.217), while walking was a predictor for successful weaning (p=0.030; R²=0.907) and discharge (p=0.033; R²=0.373). The post-program period was associated with the MMS at ICU discharge (p<0.001; R²=0.40). CONCLUSION: Early mobilization implementation through changes in low mobility culture and multi-professional actions improved quality indicators, including clinical, ventilation, and physical functional quality, without compromising patient safety in the ICU.

Evaluation of Drug-Related Problems of Intensive Care Unit Patients by Clinical Pharmacists: A Retrospective Study.

Objectives: The study aimed to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) and risk factors associated with the emergence of DRPs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients in the anesthesiology and reanimation ICU of a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. DRPs identified by clinical pharmacists were classified using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Classification for DRPs version 9.1. The association between various patient-related factors, and having DRPs were evaluated. Results: In total, 222 patients were included in the study, 128 of which were male (57.7%). The number of DRPs was 388 in 135 patients (1.75 ± 2.47 DRPs per patient). The group in which at least 1 DRP was identified, the duration of hospitalization was longer than in the group in which no DRP was identified (p < 0.001). In the groups in which there was the presence of mechanical ventilation support at admission or mortality, the mean DRP count was significantly higher than that in the other group (p < 0.05). Age, duration of hospitalization, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at admission had positive relationships with the DRP count, but the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) showed a negative relationship (p < 0.05). According to the binary logistic regression analysis (p < 0.001), in which the age of the patient, GCS score, APACHE II score at admission, duration of hospitalization, and presence of mechanical ventilation support at admission were included, only the APACHE II score at admission and duration of hospitalization significantly affected the emergence of DRPs. The major problem was related to treatment effectiveness (47.9%), followed by treatment safety problems (29.9%). The major causes of these problems were dose selection (44.0%) and drug selection (36.8). Interventions were made at the drug (97.2%) and prescriber level (2.3%). The acceptance rate of interventions and resolution rate of the DRPs were 93.6% and 85.1%, respectively. The top three medications that caused DRPs the most were as follows: meropenem, colistin, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Conclusion: Clinical pharmacists can detect and treat DRPs quickly. Our analysis shows that clinical pharmacy services are needed in high-DRP wards like ICU.

A High-Dose Corticosteroid Treatment Increases Coronavirus Disease of 2019 Mortality in Intensive Care Units.

Objectives: The study is aimed to investigate the association between different corticosteroid treatment regimens and clinical status, complications, mechanical ventilation requirement, and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in individuals diagnosed with Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19). Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive retrospective study. Patients admitted to the ICU for COVID-19 and treated with low- or medium-dose corticosteroid therapy (methylprednisolone at a dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg for 7-10 days) were compared with patients treated with high-dose pulse corticosteroid therapy (methylprednisolone at varying doses of 250 mg, 500 mg or 1000 mg for 3-7 days) in addition to standard therapy because of increased pulmonary infiltrate and elevated inflammatory markers during clinical monitoring. All demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, clinical course, laboratory findings, discharge status, 28-day mortality, intubation status, acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation II score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sequential organ failure assessment score, were recorded. Results: Corticosteroid treatment was administered to 689 (88.3%) of 780 COVID-19 ICU patients between April 2020 and October 2021. The overall mortality rate was 45.1% (n= 352). When the mortality rates of patients were compared according to the corticosteroid dose, the mortality rate in the low-to-medium-dose group (40%) was significantly lower than that in the high-dose group (76%). In addition, significant deterioration in laboratory and clinical parameters was observed in the high-dose corticosteroid group. Conclusion: High mortality, adverse effects, and complications were significantly increased when high-dose corticosteroids were administered. Corticosteroid therapy should be used cautiously according to the patient's clinical condition, disease stage, comorbidities, and systemic or organ reserves.

Working conditions during pregnancy: a survey of 3590 European anaesthesiologists and intensivists.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy adds challenges for healthcare professionals, regardless of gender. We investigated experiences during pregnancy, attitudes towards pregnant colleagues, family planning decisions, and awareness of regulations among European anaesthesiologists and intensivists. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 3590 anaesthesiologists and intensivists from 47 European countries. The survey, available for 12 weeks, collected data on demographics, working conditions, safety perceptions, and the impact of clinical practice and training demands on family planning. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, whereas qualitative data underwent thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Only 41.4% (n=678) of women were satisfied with their working conditions during pregnancy, and only 38.5% (n=602) considered their working environment safe. The proportion of women who changed their clinical practice during pregnancy and who took sick leave to avoid potentially harmful working conditions increased over time (P<0.001 for both). Men had children more often during residency than women (P<0.001). Pregnant colleagues' safety concerns influenced clinical practice, with women and men who had experience with their own and partner's pregnancy being more likely to modify their practices. Work and training demands discouraged plans to have children, particularly among women, leading to consideration of leaving training. Awareness of national regulations was limited, and respondents highlighted a need for better support and flexible working conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Improved support and working environments for pregnant colleagues and ability to express preferred clinical areas for work are needed. Department heads should commit to safety and family friendliness, and men transitioning to parenthood should not be neglected.

Phoenix criteria for sepsis: are these enough to guide a clinician?

Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in children worldwide. There is a paucity of data on the criteria used to define sepsis and septic shock and predict mortality. Schlapbach et al. published Phoenix criteria to define sepsis in JAMA in 2024. Previously, paediatricians have used systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, but these criteria lack sensitivity and specificity. This group recommends that sepsis in children be identified by a Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 points in children with suspected infection, which indicates potentially life-threatening dysfunction of the respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and/or neurological systems. Though included in the 8-point criteria, important criteria like renal and liver are missing from the main criteria. We remain worried about the way these criteria got excluded from the main criteria. Therefore, in this brief report, whilst commending the authors for this stelar task, we highlight the main pitfalls in these criteria especially the renal, neurologic, and liver criteria. These criteria have been shown to be independently associated with outcomes, and we recommend that in the future iterations of the criteria, renal and liver criteria should be defined according to latest definitions and the task force consider utilizing latest criteria for each organ system involved within the formulated criteria. CONCLUSION:  In conclusion, Phoenix criteria are a step in the right direction to define life-threatening organ dysfunction in sepsis, but clinicians need to be mindful that diagnosis/treatment of less severe sepsis should not be delayed if these criteria are not met. Therefore, local early detection and management tools for sepsis should be followed. WHAT IS KNOWN: • There has always been a quest for a definition for pediatric sepsis. There are limitations to the previous pediatric sepsis criteria which were published in 2005 by the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC). IPSCC defines sepsis as a suspected or confirmed infection in the presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). These new Phoenix Pediatric Sepsis (PPS) criteria for sepsis and septic shock are intended to identify children with life-threatening organ dysfunction due to infection, and the score was developed based on a very large pediatric dataset. WHAT IS NEW: • Though the intention of Phoenix criteria is to help identify children with life threatening organ dysfunction, unfortunately the crietria will miss signs of early sepis. In this manuscript, we point out some of the drawbacks of these criteria which need to be borne in mind while applying these criteria.

Comparison of Four Severity Assessment Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients for Predicting Patient Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study From a Single Tertiary Center in Central India.

Background and aim A variety of scoring systems are employed in intensive care units (ICUs) with the objective of predicting patient morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to compare four different severity assessment scoring systems, namely, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II (SAPS II) to predict prognosis of all patients admitted to a mixed medical ICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in central India. Methods The prospective observational study included 1136 patients aged 18 years or more, admitted to the mixed medical ICU. All patients underwent severity assessment using the four scoring systems, namely APACHE II, SOFA, REMS, and SAPS II, after admission. Predicted mortality was calculated from each of the scores and actual patient outcomes were noted. Receiver operating curve analysis was undertaken to identify the cut-off value of individual scoring systems for predicting mortality with optimum sensitivity and specificity. Calibration and discrimination were employed to ascertain the validity of each scoring model. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses among the study participants were conducted to identify the best scoring system, after adjusting for potential confounders. Results Final analysis was done on 957 study participants (mean (±SD) age-58.4 (±12.9) years; males-62.2%). The mortality rate was 14.7%. APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, and REMS scores were significantly higher among the non-survivors as compared to the survivors (p<0.05). SAPS II was found to have the highest AUC of 0.981 (p<0.001). SAPS II score >58 had 93.6% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity, 73.3% PPV, 98.8% NPV, and 94.0% diagnostic accuracy in predicting mortality. This scoring system also had the best calibration. Binary logistic regression showed that all four scoring systems were significantly associated with ICU mortality. After adjusting for each other, only SAPS II remained significantly associated with ICU mortality. Conclusion Both SAPS II and APACHE II were observed to have good calibration and discriminatory power; however, SAPS II had the best prediction power suggesting that it may be a useful tool for clinicians and researchers in assessing the severity of illness and mortality risk in critically ill patients.

Author Response: Emphasizing Patient-centered Outcomes and Improved Exclusion Criteria in Randomized Control Trials for Clinical Nutrition in ICU.

How to cite this article: Govil D, Chandrasekaran A, Pachisia AV, Harne R, Patel SJ, Pal D. Author Response: Emphasizing Patient-centered Outcomes and Improved Exclusion Criteria in Randomized Control Trials for Clinical Nutrition in ICU. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):806-807.

SARS-CoV-2 viral load is linked to remdesivir efficacy in severe Covid-19 admitted to intensive care.

Remdesivir therapy has been declared as efficient in the early stages of Covid-19. Of the 339 patients (males 55.8%, age 71(59;77) years) with a detectable viral load, 140 were treated with remdesivir (of those 103 in the ICU and 57 immunosuppressed) and retrospectively compared with 199 patients (of those 82 in the ICU and 28 immunosuppressed) who were denied therapy due to advanced Covid-19. The viral load was estimated by detecting nucleocapsid antigen in serum (n = 155, median 217(28;1524)pg/ml), antigen in sputum (n = 18, COI 18(4.6;32)), nasopharyngeal antigen (n = 44, COI 17(8;35)) and the real-time PCR (n = 122, Ct 21(18;27)). After adjustment for confounders, patients on remdesivir had better 12-month survival (HR 0.66 (0.44;0.98), p = 0.039), particularly when admitted to the ICU (HR 0.49 (0.29;0.81), p = 0.006). For the immunocompromised patients, the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.55 (0.18;1.69), p = 0.3). The other most significant confounders were age, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, leukocyte/lymphocyte ratio, admission creatinine and immunosuppression. The impact of monoclonal antibodies or previous vaccinations was not significant. Despite frequent immune suppression including haemato-oncology diseases, lymphopenia, and higher inflammatory markers in the remdesivir group, the results support remdesivir administration with respect to widely available estimates of viral load in patients with high illness severity.

Minimally invasive technique facilitates early extubation after cardiac surgery: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative time to extubation plays a role in prognosis after heart valve surgery; however, its exact impact has not been clarified. This study compared the postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and conventional sternotomy, focusing on early extubation and factors influencing prolonged mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Data from 744 patients who underwent heart valve surgery at the Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between August 2019 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes in patients who underwent conventional median sternotomy (MS) and minimally invasive (MI) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Kaplan-Meier curves. Clinical data, including surgical data, postoperative cardiac function, postoperative complications, and intensive care monitoring data, were analyzed. RESULTS: After propensity score matching and IPTW, 196 cases of conventional MS were compared with 196 cases of MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Compared to patients in the conventional MS group, those in the MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group in the matched cohort had a higher early postoperative extubation rate (P < 0.01), reduced incidence of postoperative pleural effusion (P < 0.05), significantly shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit (P < 0.01), shorter overall length of hospital stay (P < 0.01), and lower total cost of hospitalization (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Successful early tracheal extubation is important for the intensive care management of patients after heart valve surgery. The advantages of MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery over conventional MS include significant reductions in the duration of use of mechanical ventilation support, reduced length of intensive care unit stay, reduced total length of hospitalization, and a favorable patient recovery rate.

Contribution of ethnicity, area level deprivation and air pollution to paediatric intensive care unit admissions in the United Kingdom 2008-2021.

Background: There is emerging evidence on the impact of social and environmental determinants of health on paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions and outcomes. We analysed UK paediatric intensive care data to explore disparities in the incidence of admission according to a child's ethnicity and the degree of deprivation and pollution in the child's residential area. Methods: Data were extracted on children <16 years admitted to UK PICUs between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2021 from the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) database. Ethnicity was categorised as White, Asian, Black, Mixed or Other. Deprivation was quantified using the 'children in low-income families' measure and outdoor air pollution was characterised using mean annual PM2.5 level at local authority level, both divided into population-weighted quintiles. UK population estimates were used to calculate crude incidence of PICU admission. Incidence rate ratios were calculated using Poisson regression models. Findings: There were 245,099 admissions, of which 60.7% were unplanned. After adjusting for age and sex, Asian and Black children had higher relative incidence of unplanned PICU admission compared to White (IRR 1.29 [95% CI: 1.25-1.33] and 1.50 [95% CI: 1.44-1.56] respectively), but there was no evidence of increased incidence of planned admission. Children living in the most deprived quintile had 1.50 times the incidence of admission in the least deprived quintile (95% CI: 1.46-1.54). There were higher crude admission levels of children living in the most polluted quintile compared to the least (157.8 vs 113.6 admissions per 100,000 child years), but after adjustment for ethnicity, deprivation, age and sex there was no association between pollution and PICU admission (IRR 1.00 [95% CI: 1.00-1.00] per 1 µg/m3 increase). Interpretation: Ethnicity and deprivation impact the incidence of PICU admission. When restricting to unplanned respiratory admissions and ventilated patients only, increasing pollution level was associated with increased incidence of PICU admission. It is essential to act to reduce these observed disparities, further work is needed to understand mechanisms behind these findings and how they relate to outcomes. Funding: There was no direct funding for this project. HM was funded by an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship (ACF-2022-18-017).

The relationship of COVID-19 severity with laboratory findings and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients admitted to a large teaching hospital in Iran: A cross-sectional study.

Background and Aims: COVID-19 patients might be admitted to the hospital based on their clinical manifestations or to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to the severity of their symptoms or critical situation. Our main objective was to investigate clinical and demographic factors influencing COVID-19 patients' admission to the ICU and length of stay (LOS) using extracted data from the hospital information systems in Iran. Methods: The data of hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 were retrieved from the health information system of Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran between March 2020 and February 2022. The primary outcome was the ICU admission, and the secondary outcome was the LOS. The correlation analysis between laboratory findings and demographic data with ICU admission and LOS was done using SPSS 21.0, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of all the 4156 patients, 2391 (57.5%) were male and the mean age was 58.69 ± 8.19 years. Of these, 9.5% of patients were admitted to ICU at any time point during their hospital stay. Age and laboratory variables such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), ALT (U/L), albumin (g/dL), plasma glucose (mg/dL), ferritin levels (ng/mL), and phosphorous levels (mg/dL) shown the significant relationship with ICU admission. Also, being a smoker and having hypoxemia had a significant relationship with longer stays in the hospital. In this study, we validated a cut-off value of 4.819 for NLR, calculated at hospitalization, as a useful predictor of disease progression and occurrence of serious clinical outcomes, such as ICU admission. Conclusion: The study examined various clinical factors associated with ICU admission in COVID-19 patients. The findings suggest that certain factors can increase the risk of ICU admission and influence the length of hospital stay which should be focused in future studies.

Lactate Monitoring in Intensive Care: A Comprehensive Review of Its Utility and Interpretation.

Lactate monitoring is critical in managing critically ill patients in intensive care settings. Elevated lactate levels often signify underlying metabolic disturbances such as tissue hypoxia, anaerobic metabolism, or impaired lactate clearance, which are prevalent in conditions like sepsis, shock, and trauma. Understanding the physiological basis of lactate production and its significance in clinical practice is essential for interpreting its diagnostic and prognostic value. This comprehensive review aims to explore the utility of lactate monitoring across various critical care scenarios. It provides an overview of lactate's metabolic pathways, methods of measurement, and the clinical implications of interpreting lactate levels in different contexts. Additionally, the review discusses current evidence on lactate-guided therapeutic interventions and highlights challenges and limitations to their application. By synthesizing the existing literature and clinical insights, this review aims to enhance the understanding of the role of lactate monitoring in assessing disease severity, guiding treatment strategies, and predicting outcomes in critically ill patients. Ultimately, this review underscores the importance of integrating lactate monitoring into routine clinical practice to optimize patient care and improve clinical outcomes in intensive care settings.