Treatment preferences and current practices regarding open tibial shaft fractures.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to reveal the treatment preferences and current practices regarding open tibial shaft fracture (OTSF). Patients and methods: Online surveys of treatment preferences and current practice of OTSF were conducted by orthopedic trauma doctors from various medical institutions in Zhejiang Province. The survey contains three modules. The first module is the basic information of the participants, the second module is the treatment patterns for Gustilo-Anderson type I-II (GA I/II), and the third module is the treatment patterns for Gustilo-Anderson type IIIA (GA IIIA). Furthermore, each treatment pattern was divided into four aspects, including antibiotic prophylaxis, irrigation and debridement, fracture stabilization, and wound management. Results: A total of 132 orthopedic trauma doctors from 41 hospitals in Zhejiang province, participated the online surveys. In GA I-IIIA OTSF, more than three-quarters of participants considered <3 h as the appropriate timing of antibiotic administration after trauma. In fact, only 41.67% of participants administered antibiotics within 3 h after trauma. 90.91 and 86.36% of participants thought debridement within 6 h was reasonable for GA I/II and GA IIIA OTSF, respectively. However, in reality only about half of patients received debridement within 6 h on average. The most common reason for delayed debridement was patients' transport delay. 87.88 and 97.3% of participants preferred secondary internal fixation following external fixation for GA I/II and GA IIIA OTSF, respectively. Additionally, over half of participants preferred use of locking plate for treating GA I-IIIA OTSF. The most common reasons for choosing delayed internal fixation for GA I-IIIA OTSF were infection risk and damage control. 78.79 and 65.91% supported immediate internal fixation after removing the external fixation for GA I-IIIA OTSF, respectively. Regarding wound closure, 86.36 and 63.64% of participants reported primary closure for GA I/II and GA IIIA OTSF, respectively. Over three fourths of participants agreed that preoperative and postoperative multiple wound cultures should be performed to predict infection for GA I-IIIA OTSF. Conclusion: The study first presents the current preference and practice regarding management of GA I-IIIA OTSF in Zhejiang. Majority of surgeons in our study preferred secondary internal fixation following external fixation for GA I-IIIA OTSF and over half of surgeons preferred use of locking plate for treating GA I-IIIA OTSF. This study may provide a reference for trauma orthopedic surgeons in the treatment of GA I-IIIA OTSF.

Outcomes of early versus late irrigation and debridement of pediatric open long bone fractures.

BACKGROUND: Open long bone fractures are a major concern for pediatric patients due to the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Early studies have recommended irrigation and debridement of open fractures within 6 hours-8 hours for the prevention of SSI. According to the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Best Practice Guidelines, in 2015, irrigation and debridement should be done within 24 hours. AIM: To identify whether early irrigation and debridement, within 8 hours, vs late, between 8 hours and 24 hours, for pediatric open long bone fractures impacts rate of SSI. METHODS: Using retrospective data review from the National Trauma Data Bank, Trauma Quality Improvement Project (TQIP) of 2019. TQIP database is own by the ACS and it is the largest database for trauma quality program in the world. Propensity matching analysis was performed for the study. RESULTS: There were 390 pediatric patients with open long bone fractures who were included in the study. After completing propensity score matching, we had 176 patients in each category, irrigation and debridement within 8 hours and irrigation and debridement between 8 hours and 24 hours. We found no significant differences between each group for the rate of deep SSI which was 0.6% for patients who received surgical irrigation and debridement within 8 hours and 1.1% for those who received it after 8 hours [adjusted odd ratio (AOR): 0.5, 95%CI: 0.268-30.909, P > 0.99]. For the secondary outcomes studied, in terms of length of hospital stay, patients who received irrigation and debridement within 8 hours stayed for an average of 3.5 days, and those who received it after 8 hours stayed for an average of 3 days, with no significant difference found, and there were also no significant differences found between the discharge dispositions of the patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the recommendation for managing open long bone fractures from the ACS: Complete surgical irrigation and debridement within 24 hours.

Brodie's abscess as a late complication of external fixation of the distal radius: A case report.

CASE: A 41-year-old male presented with an insidious onset of pain and swelling about the dorsal wrist, and was found to have a Brodie's abscess in the distal radius. The patient had a history of a distal radius fracture, treated with external fixation, nineteen years prior, which we believe contributed to the infection. The patient was treated surgically with abscess irrigation, debridement, bony curettage, bioactive glass S53P4 allograft, with concurrent antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Brodie's abscesses can have atypical presentations, and a thorough history must be obtained from patients to identify any potential sources of infection.

Superinfections of the Spine: A Single-Institution Experience.

Background/Objectives: A superinfection occurs when a new, secondary organism colonizes an existing infection. Spine infections are associated with high patient morbidity and sometimes require multiple irrigations and debridements (I&Ds). When multiple I&Ds are required, the risk of complications increases. The purpose of this study was to report our experience with spine superinfections and determine which patients are typically affected. Methods: A retrospective case series of spine superinfections and a retrospective case-control analysis were conducted. Data were collected manually from electronic medical records. Spine I&Ds were identified. Groups were created for patients who had multiple I&Ds for (1) a recurrence of the same causative organism or (2) a superinfection with a novel organism. Preoperative demographic, clinical, and microbiologic data were compared between these two outcomes. A case series of superinfections with descriptive data was constructed. Lastly, two illustrative cases were provided in a narrative format. Results: A total of 92 patients were included in this analysis. Superinfections occurred after 6 out of the 92 (7%) initial I&Ds and were responsible for 6 out of the 24 (25%) repeat I&Ds. The preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) of the patients with a superinfection were significantly lower than those in the control group (p = 0.022 and p = 0.032). Otherwise, the observed differences in the preoperative variables were not statistically different. In the six cases of superinfection, the presence of high-risk comorbidities, a history of substance abuse, or a lack of social support were commonly observed. The superinfecting organisms included Candida, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Staphylococcus species. Conclusions: Superinfections are a devastating complication requiring reoperation after initial spine I&D. Awareness of the possibility of superinfection and common patient archetypes can be helpful for clinicians and care teams. Future work is needed to examine how to identify, help predict, and prevent spine superinfections.

Open fractures: evidence-based best practices.

Open fracture management is a common challenge to orthopaedic trauma surgeons and a burdensome condition to the patient, health care, and entire society. Fracture-related infection (FRI) is the leading morbid complication to avoid during open fracture management because it leads to sepsis, nonunion, limb loss, and overall very poor region-specific and general functional outcomes. This review, based on a symposium presented at the 2022 OTA International Trauma Care Forum, provides a practical and evidence-based summary on key strategies to prevent FRI in open fractures, which can be grouped as optimizing host factors, antimicrobial prophylaxis, surgical site management (skin preparation, debridement, and wound irrigation), provision of skeletal stability, and soft-tissue coverage. When it is applicable, strategies are differentiated between optimal resource and resource-limited settings.

Surgical site infection following isolated lumbar discectomy increases odds of revision lumbar surgery within first 6 months, but not beyond.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar discectomy is a commonly performed surgery following which surgical site infection (SSI) may occur. Prior literature has suggested that, following SSI related to lumbar fusion, the rate of subsequent lumbar surgeries is increased over prolonged periods of time. This has not been studied specifically for lumbar discectomy. PURPOSE: To define factors associated with SSI following lumbar discectomy and determine if subsequently matched cohorts with and without SSI have differential rates of subsequent lumbar surgery beyond irrigation and debridement (I&Ds) over time. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients undergoing isolated primary lumbar laminotomy/discectomy were identified from the 2010-2021 M157 PearlDiver database. Exclusion criteria included: age<18 years, preoperative diagnosis of infection, neoplastic, or traumatic diagnoses within 90 days prior to index surgery, additional spinal surgeries on the same day as lumbar discectomy, and not being active in the database for at least 90 days postoperative. From this study population, those who developed SSI were identified based on undergoing I&D within 90 days after surgery. Those with versus without SSI were then matched 1:4 based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), and obesity. OUTCOME MEASURES: Following initial I&D, incidence of revision lumbar surgery (revision lumbar discectomy, lumbar laminectomy, lumbar fusion) out to 5 years after lumbar discectomy. METHODS: Following index isolated lumbar discectomy, those with versus without SSI requiring I&D were matched and compared for incidence of secondary surgery in defined time intervals (0-6 months, 6-12 months, 1-2 years, 2-5 years) using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for patient age, sex, ECI, and obesity status. RESULTS: Of 323,025 isolated lumbar discectomy patients, SSI requiring I&D was identified for 583 (0.18%). Multivariable analysis revealed several independent predictors of these SSIs: younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.85 per decade increase), ECI (OR 1.22 per 2-point increase), and obesity (OR 1.30). Following matching of those with versus without SSI requiring I&D, rates of subsequent surgery beyond I&D were compared. Those with SSI had significantly increased odds of lumbar revision in the first six months (OR 5.26, p<.001), but not 6-12 months (p=.462), 1-2 years (p=.515), or 2-5 years (p=.677). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, SSI requiring I&D is a rare postoperative complication following lumbar discectomy. If occurring, subsequent surgery beyond I&D was higher in the first 6 months, but then not increased at subsequent time points out to five years.

Associations with unplanned repeat irrigation and debridement of native septic arthritis.

PURPOSE: To identify associations with unplanned repeat irrigation and debridement (I&D) after arthrotomy for native septic arthritis. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients with native septic arthritis treated with open arthrotomies. The primary outcome was unplanned repeat I&D within 90 days. Associations evaluated for included comorbidities, ability to bear weight, fever, immunosuppressed status, purulence, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count (synovial fluid and serum levels), and synovial fluid polymorphonuclear cell percentage (PMN%). RESULTS: There were 59 arthrotomies in 53 patients involving the knee (n = 32), shoulder (n = 10), elbow (n = 8), ankle (n = 6), and hip (n = 3). The median patient age was 52, and a 71.2% were male. An unplanned repeat I&D was required in 40.7% (n = 24). The median time to the second I&D was 4 days (interquartile range 3 to 9). On univariate analysis, unplanned repeat I&Ds were associated with fever (p = 0.03), purulence (p = 0.01), bacteria growth on cultures (p = 0.02), and the use of deep drains (p = 0.05). On multivariate analysis, the only variables that remained associated with unplanned repeat I&Ds were fever (odds ratio (OR) 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3, 23.6, p = 0.02) and purulence (OR 5.3, CI 1.1, 24.4, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: An unplanned repeat I&D was required in 40.7% of patients and was associated with fever and purulence. These findings highlight the difficulty of controlling these infections and support the need for future research into better methods of management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, Level III.

Higher 2-Year Cumulative Incidence of Mental Health Disorders Following Irrigation and Debridement in Primary Lumbar Fusion.

Introduction: Spinal fusion is an operation that is employed to treat spinal diseases. Surgical site infection (SSI) after lumbar fusion (LF) is a postoperative complication. SSI is treated with irrigation and debridement (I&D), which requires readmittance following discharge or prolonged hospital stays, which are deleterious to patients' mental health. The long-term relationship between treating SSI with I&D and patients' mental health is still understudied. Methods: Using the Mariner dataset from the PearlDiver Patient Records Database using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases procedure codes, retrospective cohort analysis was carried out. This study involved 445,480 patients who underwent LF with at least 2-year follow-up and were followed up for 2 years. Of the patients, 2,762 underwent I&D. Using univariate analysis employing Pearson Chi-square and Student t-test, where appropriate (Table 1), patient demographics between cohorts were gathered. 2-year cumulative incidence (CI) between LF and I&D cohorts was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis (Fig. 1, 2, 3). Cox proportional hazards were employed to observe significant differences in CI rates (Table 2). Results: For patients who received I&D, 2-year CI depression (HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.49-1.99; P<0.001) and stress (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.02-1.79; P=0.035) rates were significantly higher than for those who did not. There was no statistically significant difference in 2-year CI anxiety rates between cohorts (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.58-1.46; P=0.719). Conclusions: In conclusion, 16.8% of patients developed new-onset depression 2 years following I&D, in comparison to 10.3% of those who underwent LF. Patients who underwent I&D following LF were significantly more likely to experience depression and stress. To mitigate negative mental health outcomes, mental health services should be available to patients who underwent surgery.

Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention is Well-Tolerated Without Inducing Resistance: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) maximizes reoperation-free survival. We evaluated SAT after DAIR of acutely infected primary TJA regarding: 1) adverse drug reaction (ADR)/intolerance; 2) reoperation for infection; and 3) antibiotic resistance. METHODS: Patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) DAIR for acute periprosthetic joint infection at two academic medical centers from 2015 to 2020 were identified (n = 115). Data were collected on patient demographics, infecting organisms, antibiotics, ADR/intolerances, reoperations, and antibiotic resistances. Median SAT duration was 11 months. Stepwise multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify covariates significantly associated with outcomes of interest. RESULTS: There were 11.1 and 16.3% of TKA and THA DAIR patients, respectively, who had ADR/intolerance to SAT. Patients prescribed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (P = .0014) or combination antibiotic therapy (P = .0169) after TKA DAIR had increased risk of ADR/intolerance. There was no difference in reoperation-free survival between TKA (83.3%) and THA (65.1%) DAIR (P = .5900) at mean 2.8-year follow-up. Risk of reoperation for infection was higher among TKA Staphylococcus aureus infections (P = .0004) and lower with increased SAT duration (P < .0450). The optimal duration of SAT was nearly 2 years. No cases of antibiotic resistance developed due to SAT. CONCLUSIONS: Consider SAT after TJA DAIR due to improved reoperation-free survival and favorable safety profile. Prolonged SAT did not induce antibiotic resistance. Use trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole with caution because of the increased likelihood of ADR/intolerance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Arthroscopic versus open irrigation and debridement in native knee septic arthritis: A retrospective review.

Introduction: Native knee septic arthritis is a rare condition with a potential for high morbidity if not promptly treated. Treatment involves surgical decompression of the affected joint along with systemic antibiotic therapy. The purpose of this study is to compare arthroscopic versus open irrigation and debridement for treatment of native knee septic arthritis. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted at a single academic institution of all patients treated for native knee septic arthritis from January 2007 until August 2018 utilizing ICD and CPT codes. Patient demographics, type of surgical procedure, need for reoperation, laboratory values, length of stay, and comorbidities were compared. Results: A cohort of sixty-six patients who underwent 85 surgeries were included. Among these surgeries, 52 (61%) were arthroscopic while 33 (39%) were open arthrotomies, and 21% required more than one operation. While not statistically significant, the odds of reoperation was higher for those that underwent arthroscopic compared to open irrigation and debridement on univariable (OR = 4.05, p = .08) and multivariable analysis (OR = 4.39, p = .10). Additionally, patients were more likely to require a longer hospital stay if they initially underwent arthroscopic rather than open debridement (RR = 1.31, p = .02). Conclusion: Native knee septic arthritis can be treated with a single surgery in the majority of cases. In our sample, there was an increased odds of reoperation in those treated arthroscopically compared to open, though this finding was not statistically significant. We found longer length of stay for patients undergoing arthroscopic rather than open irrigation and debridement - even after controlling for multiple operations, culture status, sex, age, and comorbidities.

'Tis Time 'Tis Time: The Importance of Operative Time, Thoroughness, and Shakespeare in Dair Procedures in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Background: Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), while rare, are a devasting complication of both total joint arthroplasty (TJA). With most patients undergoing surgical treatment for PJI, options vary between one-stage or two-stage (the gold standard) procedures. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedures are a common, less morbid alternative to two-stage revisions, but patients undergoing DAIR procedures more often experience reinfections. This is likely in part due to non-standardized irrigation and debridement (I&D) methods within these procedures. Furthermore, DAIR procedures are often desired due to their cost effectiveness and lesser operative times, but no investigations have occurred regarding operative-time-based outcomes. This study aimed to compare reinfection incidence with procedure time in DAIR procedures. In addition, this study aimed to introduce the novel Macbeth Protocol for the I&D portion of DAIR procedures and assess its efficacy. Methods: Records of unilateral DAIR procedures for primary TJA PJI performed by arthroplasty surgeons from 2015-2022 were retrospectively reviewed for patient demographics, select medical history, body mass index (BMI), joint, microbiology, and follow-up data. In addition, a single surgeon's DAIR procedures (for primary and revision TJA) were reviewed and use of The Macbeth Protocol was noted. Results: A total of 71 patients (mean age 64.00 ± 12.81 years) who underwent unilateral DAIR were included. Patients with reinfections following their DAIR procedure had significantly (p = 0.034) lower procedure times (93.72 ± 15.01 min) compared to those without reinfections (105.87 ± 21.91 min). Twenty-two patients underwent 28 DAIR procedures by the senior author, where 11 (39.3%) DAIR procedures utilized The Macbeth Protocol. The use of this protocol did not significantly affect reinfection rate (p = 0.364). Conclusion: This study concluded that increased operative time led to less reinfections for DAIR procedures treating unilateral primary TJA PJIs. Additionally, this study introduced The Macbeth Protocol, which demonstrated promising potential as an I&D technique despite not showing statistical significance. Arthroplasty surgeons should not sacrifice patient outcomes determined by reinfection rate for decreased operative time. Level of Evidence: III.

Outcome of Irrigation and Debridement with Topical Antibiotic Delivery Using Antibiotic-Impregnated Calcium Hydroxyapatite for the Management of Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection.

We assessed the clinical results of irrigation and debridement (I&D) with antibiotic-impregnated calcium hydroxyapatite (CHA) as a novel antibiotic delivery system for the treatment of prosthetic-joint-associated infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Thirteen patients (14 hips) treated with I&D for PJI after THA at our institution between 1997 and 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The study group included four men (five hips) and nine women, with an average age of 66.3 years. Four patients (five hips) had symptoms of infection within less than 3 weeks; however, nine patients had symptoms of infection over 3 weeks. All patients received I&D with antibiotic-impregnated CHA in the surrounding bone. In two hips (two cups and one stem), cup and/or stem revision were performed with re-implantation because of implant loosening. In ten patients (11 hips), vancomycin hydrochloride was impregnated in the CHA. The average duration of follow-up was 8.1 years. Four patients included in this study died of other causes, with an average follow-up of 6.7 years. Eleven of thirteen patients (12 of 14 hips) were successfully treated, and no signs of infection were observed at the latest follow-up. In two patients (two hips) for whom treatment failed, infection was successfully treated with two-stage re-implantation. Both patients had diabetes mellitus and symptoms of infection over 3 weeks. Eighty-six percent of patients were successfully treated. No complications were observed with this antibiotic-impregnated CHA. I&D treatment with antibiotic-impregnated CHA produced a higher rate of success in patients with PJI after THA.

Schaalia (Formerly Actinomyces) turicensis Infection Following Open Rotator Cuff Repair.

We report the case of a male in his early 70s who developed a deep infection after an open rotator cuff repair, with Schaalia turicensis as the only organism isolated from a surgical biopsy of the tendon remnants and phlegmatic/purulent material at the failed repair site. This species was originally within the genus Actinomyces. We report this case because it is the only one that we could locate where an infected open rotator cuff repair site grew S. turicensis. Our patient was not diabetic, did not smoke, and did not have other recent or concurrent infections. He had hypertension, hypothyroidism, depression, and a hyperactive bladder. Hence, he only had minor risk factors for infection. His postoperative shoulder infection was eradicated with surgical irrigation and debridement, and 6.5 weeks of primarily oral antibiotic treatment. We also review the literature on infections after any shoulder surgery where Schaalia or Actinomyces species were isolated.

Analyzing risk factors for treatment failure in fracture-related infection.

INTRODUCTION: Fracture-related infection (FRI) represents a challenging clinical scenario. Limited evidence exists regarding treatment failure after initial management of FRI. The objective of our investigation was to determine incidence and risk factors for treatment failure in FRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for FRI between 2011 and 2015 at three level 1 trauma centers. One hundred and thirty-four patients treated for FRI were identified. Demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the medical record. Treatment failure was defined as the need for repeat debridement or surgical revision seven or more days after the presumed final procedure for infection treatment. Univariate comparisons were conducted between patients who experienced treatment failure and those who did not. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent associations with treatment failure. RESULTS: Of the 134 FRI patients, 51 (38.1%) experienced treatment failure. Patients who failed were more likely to have had an open injury (31% versus 17%; p = 0.05), to have undergone implant removal (p = 0.03), and additional index I&D procedures (3.3 versus 1.6; p < 0.001). Most culture results identified a single organism (62%), while 15% were culture negative. Treatment failure was more common in culture-negative infections (p = 0.08). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common organism associated with treatment failure (29%; p = 0.08). Multivariate regression demonstrated a statistically significant association between treatment failure and two or more irrigation and debridement (I&D) procedures (OR 13.22, 95% CI 4.77-36.62, p < 0.001) and culture-negative infection (OR 4.74, 95% CI 1.26-17.83, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of treatment failure following FRI continues to be high. Important risk factors associated with treatment failure include open fracture, implant removal, and multiple I&D procedures. While MRSA remains common, culture-negative infection represents a novel risk factor for failure, suggesting aggressive treatment of clinically diagnosed cases remains critical even without positive culture data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study; Level III.

Culture-negative Peri-prosthetic Joint Infection after Total Hip Arthroplasty Treatment Protocol and Outcomes in Acute and Chronic Cases.

The treatment of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections (CN PJI) of the hip represents complex entities. We, as a result of this, report on 12 cases. Irrigation and debridement (I&D) with implant retention were performed in acute cases and two-stage revisions in chronic infections. Combined antibiotic therapy was administered in all cases for 12 weeks. Infection control was achieved in all patients with an infection-free rate of 100% at 7.5 years of average follow-up.

Is Deep Vein Thrombosis Chemoprophylaxis Indicated After Spinal Irrigation and Débridement?

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for development of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing spinal irrigation and débridement for an infection with subsequent peripherally inserted central catheter placement and to determine if chemoprophylaxis mitigates the risk of developing DVT. METHODS: Patients with spinal infection and peripherally inserted central catheter placement at an academic medical center between 2009 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were grouped based on whether they had postoperative DVT. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared to determine their association with postoperative DVT. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to measure the effect of postoperative DVT chemoprophylaxis on the likelihood of DVT development. RESULTS: Of 335 patients included in the analysis, 48 (14.3%) developed DVT, and 287 (85.7%) did not develop DVT. Patients who developed DVT had a greater number of irrigation and débridement procedures (1.90 ± 1.49 vs. 1.44 ± 0.86, P = 0.024). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a history of diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-4.92; P = 0.045), DVT/pulmonary embolism (OR = 4.49; 95% CI, 1.93-10.34; P < 0.001), and number of irrigation and débridement procedures (OR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.13-2.06; P = 0.006) as significant positive predictors of postoperative DVT. Chemoprophylaxis (OR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.32-1.45; P = 0.324) was not a significant negative predictor of postoperative DVT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing spinal débridement with subsequent peripherally inserted central catheter placement are at high risk for postoperative DVT. Multiple spine débridement procedures, a history of diabetes, and previous DVT are risk factors for postoperative DVT. Chemoprophylaxis does not mitigate patients' risk for postoperative DVT.

Corticosteroid injections 2 months before arthroscopic meniscectomy increases the rate of postoperative infections requiring surgical irrigation and debridement.

PURPOSE: Consensus guidelines recommend administering a corticosteroid injection (CSI) for patients with a symptomatic degenerative meniscus lesion prior to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). A recent study found that CSI administered within 1 month prior to meniscectomy is associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection. However, infections may range in severity from superficial infections to serious infections requiring surgical interventions. The aim of this analysis was to define the rate of infections requiring surgery after APM and determine its relationship to preoperative CSI. METHODS: The PearlDiver Mariner administrative claims database was queried for patients > 35 years old who had a CSI in the year prior to isolated APM. Rates of deep infection and infection requiring surgery within 6 months were reported between matched patients with a CSI and no injection. RESULTS: After matching, there were 16,009 patients per group with a mean age of 59.4 years (SD = 9.6), 53.5% obesity, and 40% male. Forty-four of 113 patients who developed a postoperative deep infection went on to have a reoperation for irrigation and/or debridement (0.1% of all APM). Of these 44 patients, 30 had a preoperative CSI and 14 were controls unadjusted odds ratio (unadj-OR) if given CSI = 1.95, 95% CI 1.03-3.68, P = 0.04). Having a CSI within the month before surgery conferred a 4.56-fold increase in odds of an infection warranting surgery (95% CI 1.96-10.21, P < 0.01), whilst having a CSI 4-8 weeks before surgery conferred a 2.42-fold increase in odds (95% CI 1.04-5.42, P = 0.03). Receiving multiple CSI in the year prior to APM was associated with 5.27-fold increased odds of an infection requiring surgery (95% CI 1.19-23.27, P = 0.03), compared to having a single CSI. CONCLUSIONS: Serious infections requiring a surgical intervention are rare after a meniscectomy, occurring in 0.1% of APMs in a matched cohort of patients over 35. Patients were five times more likely to return to the operating room for infection after APM if they had a CSI in the month before or had multiple CSIs in the year before surgery. The risk of infection was no longer significant if there was at least a 2-month interval between preoperative CSI and APM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Risk factors for septic arthritis and multiple arthroscopic washouts: minimum 2-year follow-up at a major trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: Septic arthritis (SA) is a dangerous condition that requires emergency treatment. Managed by culture-specific antibiotics, irrigation, and debridement (I&D), some patients require repeat surgical treatment. The objectives were to determine the risk factors for SA and risk factors for repeat arthroscopic I&D in SA patients. We hypothesized that variables which directly or indirectly contributed to a larger infection burden would be associated with the development of SA and the need for repeat arthroscopic I&D. METHODS: All patients ≥ 18 years old presenting to the emergency department, orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics at our major trauma centre between January 2018 and January 2020 with a hot, swollen joint were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with previous trauma and metalwork in the affected joint, periprosthetic joint infection, previous joint arthroplasty surgery, soft tissue infection, missing data, transferred to another centre, diagnosis not concerning the joint, and < 24-month follow-up were excluded. Two hundred eleven patients were included (SA: 28; pseudogout: 32; gout: 50; others: 101). Variables of interest in the 3-month period preceding the diagnosis of SA were compared between SA and non-SA patients using univariable analysis. A multivariable logistic regression model was formed using covariates with corresponding univariable tests of p < 0.200. Similar analyses were performed to compare SA patients with multiple washouts/procedures with those with one washout/procedure. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis showed multiple risk factors for SA, namely rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.2-10.0; p = 0.023); skin infection (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 1.2-9.0; p = 0.017), liver disease (OR: 9.9; 95% CI: 2.2-43.9; p = 0.003), knee joint involvement (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.3-9.4; p = 0.014), and use of immunosuppressive medication (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.2-10.6; p = 0.027). Risk factors for multiple washouts included synovial WBC levels > 10.5 × 109 cells/L (OR: 3.0; 95% CI: 2.3-38.8; p = 0.009) and RA (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.9-66.3; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that prophylactic actions against septic arthritis should be targeted at patients with liver disease, RA, or skin infection. Repeat arthroscopic I&D of septic joints may be needed, especially in patients with synovial WBC levels > 10.5 × 109 cells/L and RA. Key Points • The risk factors for septic arthritis determined in this study are rheumatoid arthritis, skin infection, liver disease, knee joint involvement, and immunosuppressant usage. • Some septic arthritis patients need multiple rounds of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement. The risk factors for this are a synovial WBC count > 10.5 × 109 cells/L and rheumatoid arthritis.

Management of deep surgical site infections of the spine: a Canadian nationwide survey.

Background: Deep surgical site infections after spinal instrumentation represent a significant source of patient morbidity and poorer outcomes. Given lack of evidence or guidelines on the variety of procedural options in the management of deep spine surgical site infections, the purpose of this survey was to document and investigate the use of these techniques across Canada. Methods: A 34-question survey evaluating surgical techniques for irrigation and debridement in postoperative thoracolumbar infection was distributed to Canadian adult spine surgeons. Results were analyzed qualitatively, and comparisons by specialty, years of training, and number of cases were completed using Fischer's exact tests. We defined consensus as >70% agreement. Results: We received 53 responses (62% response rate) from a comprehensive sample of Canadian adult spine surgeons. There was a consensus to retain hardware (80%) and interbody implants (93%) in acute infection, to retain interbody implants in chronic/recurrent infection (71%), and application of topical antibiotics in recurrent infection (85%). There was consensus on the use of absorbable suture to close fascia in acute (83%) and chronic (87%) infection. Eighty-five percent of surgeons used nonabsorbable materials such as Nylon or staples for skin closure in chronic infection, however, there was no consensus in acute infection. Surgeons varied significantly in type, volume and pressure of fluids, adjuvant solvents, graft management, use of topical antibiotics acutely, and the use of negative pressure wound therapy. Partial hardware exchange was controversial. Additionally, specialty or surgeon experience had no impact on management strategy. Conclusions: This survey demonstrates significant heterogeneity amongst Canadian adult spine surgeons regarding key steps in the surgical management of deep instrumented spine infection, concordant with scarce literature addressing these steps.

The effect of time to irrigation and debridement on the rate of reoperation in open fractures : a propensity score-based analysis of the Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds (FLOW) study.

AIMS: Despite long-standing dogma, a clear relationship between the timing of surgical irrigation and debridement (I&D) and the development of subsequent deep infection has not been established in the literature. Traditionally, I&D of an open fracture has been recommended within six hours of injury based on animal studies from the 1970s, however the clinical basis for this remains unclear. Using data from a multicentre randomized controlled trial of 2,447 open fracture patients, the primary objective of this secondary analysis is to determine if a relationship exists between timing of wound I&D (within six hours of injury vs beyond six hours) and subsequent reoperation rate for infection or healing complications within one year for patients with open limb fractures requiring surgical treatment. METHODS: To adjust for the influence of patient and injury characteristics on the timing of I&D, a propensity score was developed from the dataset. Propensity-adjusted regression allowed for a matched cohort analysis within the study population to determine if early irrigation put patients independently at risk for reoperation, while controlling for confounding factors. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values. All analyses were conducted using STATA 14. RESULTS: In total, 2,286 of 2,447 patients randomized to the trial from 41 orthopaedic trauma centres across five countries had complete data regarding time to I&D. Prior to matching, the patients managed with early I&D had a higher proportion requiring reoperation for infection or healing complications (17% vs 13%; p = 0.019), however this does not account for selection bias of more severe injuries preferentially being treated earlier. When accounting for propensity matching, early irrigation was not associated with reoperation (OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.07); p = 0.73). CONCLUSION: When accounting for other variables, late irrigation does not independently increase risk of reoperation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1055-1062.