Risk Assessment of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in Multiple Sclerosis Patients during 1 Year of Ocrelizumab Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) caused by the JC virus is the main limitation to the use of disease modifying therapies for treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: To assess the PML risk in course of ocrelizumab, urine and blood samples were collected from 42 MS patients at baseline (T0), at 6 (T2) and 12 months (T4) from the beginning of therapy. After JCPyV-DNA extraction, a quantitative-PCR (Q-PCR) was performed. Moreover, assessment of JCV-serostatus was obtained and arrangements' analysis of non-coding control region (NCCR) and of viral capsid protein 1 (VP1) was carried out. RESULTS: Q-PCR revealed JCPyV-DNA in urine at all selected time points, while JCPyV-DNA was detected in plasma at T4. From T0 to T4, JC viral load in urine was detected, increased in two logarithms and, significantly higher, compared to viremia. NCCR from urine was archetypal. Plasmatic NCCR displayed deletion, duplication, and point mutations. VP1 showed the S269F substitution involving the receptor-binding region. Anti-JCV index and IgM titer were found to statistically decrease during ocrelizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ocrelizumab in JCPyV-DNA positive patients is safe and did not determine PML cases. Combined monitoring of ocrelizumab's effects on JCPyV pathogenicity and on host immunity might offer a complete insight towards predicting PML risk.

Which is the best PML risk stratification strategy in natalizumab-treated patients affected by multiple sclerosis?

BACKGROUND: The risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a brain infection caused by John Cunningham virus (JCPyV), is the main limitation to the use of natalizumab, highly effective in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. Establishing the PML risk against expected benefits represents an obligatory requirement of MS treatment algorithm. In order to achieve this goal, the aims of this study were to establish if JCPyV-DNA detection and non-coding control region (NCCR) arrangements could play a role of biomarkers, supporting anti-JCPyV antibodies measurement, actually the only parameter for PML risk stratification. METHODS: Thirty RRMS patients in treatment with natalizumab were enrolled. Urine and blood samples were collected according to this calendar: baseline (T0), 4 (T1), 8 (T2), 12 (T3), 16 (T4), 20 months (T5) after beginning of natalizumab therapy. After JCPyV DNA extraction, a specific quantitative-PCR (Q-PCR) and arrangements' analysis of NCCR and Viral Capsid Protein 1 (VP1) were carried out. RESULTS: Q-PCR detected JCPyV DNA in urine and blood from baseline (T0) to 20 natalizumab infusions (T5), although JC viral load in urine was significantly higher compared to viremia, at all selected time points. A contextual analysis of the anti-JCPyV-antibodies versus JCPyV-DNA detection revealed that viral DNA preceded the antibodies' presence in the serum. During the first year of natalizumab treatment, sequences isolated from blood displayed an archetype JCPyV NCCR structure with the occurrence of point mutations, whereas after one year NCCR re-organizations were observed in plasma and PBMC with duplication of NF-1 binding site in box F, duplication of box C and partial or total deletion of box D. VP1 analysis showed the amino acid change mutation S269F in plasma and S267L in PBMC, involving the receptor-binding region of VP1. Phylogenetic analysis suggested a stability and a similarity across different isolates of the JCPyV VP1. CONCLUSIONS: We highly recommend considering JCPyV-DNA detection and NCCR re-organizations as viral biomarkers in order to accurately identify JCPyV-infected patients with a specific humoral response not yet detectable and to identify NCCR arrangements correlated with the onset of neurovirulent variants.