Rotating-Hinge Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Provides Greater Arc of Motion Gains for Patients Who Have Severe Arthrofibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Arthrofibrosis is a common postoperative total knee arthroplasty (TKA) complication that results in limited range of motion (ROM). There is limited literature on outcomes after revision TKA (rTKA) for arthrofibrosis based on preoperative ROM restriction. The aims of this study were to: (1) examine ROM trajectory after rTKA for arthrofibrosis patients who have severe versus non-severe limitations; (2) compare ROM gains and final arc of motion (AOM) between severe and non-severe cohorts; (2a) compare ROM gain in a severe cohort treated with a rotating hinge (RH) versus a non-rotating hinge (non-RH) construct; and (3) assess the impact of arthrofibrosis severity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A had preoperative ROM < 70o (severe), and Group B had preoperative ROM > 70o (non-severe). Patients were assessed clinically using AOM gain, absolute ROM, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), and pain scores. Postoperative gains in AOM were compared between both groups. RESULTS: A total of 56 rTKAs (Group A (severe): n = 36, Group B (non-severe): n = 20) were performed for patients who have postoperative fibrosis. Group B had better ROM at the one-year timepoint (Group B: 95.9 ± 22.5 versus Group A: 83.2 ± 25.7). Group A had significantly better improvement in absolute AOM than Group B (31.1 ± 20.9 versus 11.4 ± 25.0, P < 0.01). The RH group demonstrated significantly better absolute AOM gain than the non-RH group (41.3 ± 19.4 versus 18.3 ± 15.2, P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in PROMs between Groups A and B or between RH and NRH groups at the final follow-up. DISCUSSION: Final ROM achieved between severe and non-severe arthrofibrosis groups were similar, and patients who have severe arthrofibrosis can expect greater absolute ROM gains and similar functional outcomes than non-severe arthrofibrosis patients. The RH rTKAs provided greater AOM gains for patients who have severe arthrofibrosis, with equivalent functional outcomes to non-RH implants. For severe arthrofibrosis patients, RH designs provided twice the overall ROM gain, however, longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether RH designs have inferior overall implant survivorship.

Establishing the Minimally Important Difference for the KOOS-Joint Replacement and PROMIS Global-10 in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Despite the overall prevalence and success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a significant portion of patients are dissatisfied with their outcomes. Purpose: To assess the responsiveness and determine the minimally important difference (MID) of 2 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS 10)-in patients after TKA. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were patients who underwent TKA from August 2015 through August 2019 and completed baseline and postoperative KOOS-JR and PROMIS 10 surveys. The PROMIS 10 consists of 2 domains: physical health and mental health. Estimates for the reliable change index (RCI) and MID, using anchor-based and distribution-based methods, were calculated for each PROM. Regression modeling was used to determine whether patient and clinical factors predicted MID thresholds or MID achievement. Results: A total of 1315 patients were included. Distribution-based MIDs, calculated using various methods from baseline scores, ranged from 19.3 to 31 for the KOOS-JR, and the RCI was 4.38. Of these patients, 293 (22.3%) demonstrated small or moderate improvement, and this cohort was included in the calculation of anchor-based MIDs. The anchor-based MIDs were 16.9 and 24.3 at 3-month and 1-year follow-up, respectively, and 66% of patients achieved the MID at 12 months. Higher preoperative PROM score, male sex, non-White race, and current smoker status were predictive of failing to achieve the anchor-based MID for KOOS-JR at 1 year postoperatively (P < .05). Higher preoperative PROM score and any 90-day adverse event predicted lower thresholds of important change in anchor-based MIDs. Higher baseline PROM scores, younger age, male sex, non-White ethnicity, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, preoperative narcotics use, not smoking, and longer hospital stay were all associated with lower odds of achieving the MID on the KOOS-JR or either of the PROMIS 10 subscales. Conclusion: The study results demonstrated relevant values for interpretation of the KOOS-JR and PROMIS 10. While patient demographics did not accurately predict which patients would achieve the MID, some potential factors predicting successful patient-reported outcomes after TKA were identified.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the KOOS, JR questionnaire for assessing knee osteoarthritis in Spanish-speaking patients.

PURPOSE: The present study aims to translate, adapt and validate a Spanish version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), including a reliability and validity analysis in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: This study conducted a prospective validation study following the six stages of the "Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures". Psychometric testing was conducted in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Subjects answered the Spanish KOOS, JR (S-KOOS, JR) and a validated Spanish Oxford Knee Score (S-OKS). Retest was conducted at 10 days. Acceptability, floor and ceiling effect, internal consistency (Cronbach's α), reproducibility (mixed-effect model coefficient [MEMC]) and construct validity (Spearman's correlation; p = 0.05) were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (mean age: 65.6 ± 5.39; 48.8% female) participated in the study. All patients (100%) answered both scores during the first assessment and 38 (92.7%) during the second assessment. All patient-reported outcomes measures were answered completely (100%). The S-KOOS, JR resulted in 100% acceptability when answered. There were no ceiling or floor effects detected. The Cronbach's α for the S-KOOS, JR was 0.927 and its MEMC was 0.852 (CI 95% 0.636-1.078). The Spearman's correlation between the S-KOOS, JR and the S-OKS was 0.711 (CI 0.345-0.608; p < 0.001) and 0.870 (CI 0.444-0.651; p < 0.001) for the first and second assessments, respectively. CONCLUSION: The S-KOOS, JR has very high internal consistency and reproducibility, with a high correlation with the S-OKS; it is a reliable and valid instrument for characterising Spanish-speaking patients suffering from knee OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Thresholds Should Not be Used for Indicating Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While Medicare requires patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for many quality programs, some commercial insurers are requiring preoperative PROMs when determining eligibility for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Concerns exist that these data may be used to deny TKA to patients above a specific PROM score, but the optimal threshold is unknown. We aimed to evaluate TKA outcomes based on theoretical PROM thresholds. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 25,246 consecutive primary TKA patients from 2016 to 2019. Hypothesized preoperative knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement cutoffs of 40, 50, 60, and 70 points were used. Preoperative scores below each threshold were considered "approved" surgery. Preoperative scores above each threshold were considered "denied" surgery. In-hospital complications, 90-day readmissions, and discharge disposition were evaluated. One-year minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated using previously validated anchor-based methods. RESULTS: For "denied" patients below thresholds 40, 50, 60, and 70 points, 1-year MCID achievement was 88.3%, 85.9%, 79.6%, and 77%, respectively. In-hospital complication rates for approved patients were 2.2%, 2.3%, 2.1%, and 2.1%, while 90-day readmission rates were 4.6%, 4.5%, 4.3%, and 4.3%, respectively. Approved patients had higher MCID achievement rates (P < .001) for all thresholds but higher nonhome discharge rates than denied patients for thresholds 40 (P < .001), 50 (P = .002), and 60 (P = .024). Approved and denied patients had similar in-hospital complication and 90-day readmission rates. CONCLUSION: Most patients achieved MCID at all theoretical PROMs thresholds with low complication and readmission rates. Setting preoperative PROM thresholds for TKA eligibility can help optimize patient improvement, but such a policy can create access to care barriers for some patients who would otherwise benefit from a TKA.

Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for failure to achieve the 1-year MCID of the KOOS, JR and PROMIS PF-SF10a after TKA.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia, which is a progressive and multifactorial condition of decreased muscle strength, has been identified as an independent predictor for falls, revision, infection, and readmissions following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but its association to patient reported outcomes (PROMs) is less studied. The aim of this study is to determine if sarcopenia and other measures of body composition are correlated with ability to achieve the 1-year minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the KOOS JR and PROMIS-PF-SF10a following primary TKA. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective case-control study was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients over the age of 18 undergoing primary TKA, body composition metrics determined by computed tomography (CT), and available pre- and post-operative PROM scores. Predictors of achievement of the 1-year MCID of the KOOS JR and PROMIS PF-SF-10a were determined through a multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: 140 primary TKAs met inclusion criteria. 74 (52.85%) patients achieved the 1-year KOOS, JR MCID and 108 (77.41%) patients achieved the 1-year MCID for the PROMIS PF-SF10a. Sarcopenia was independently associated with decreased odds of achieving the MCID of both the KOOS, JR (OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.10-0.97, p = 0.04) and the PROMIS-PF-SF10a (OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.12-0.85, p = 0.02) CONCLUSIONS: In our study, sarcopenia was independently associated with increased odds of failure to achieve the 1-year MCID of the KOOS, JR and PROMIS PF-SF10a after TKA. Early identification of sarcopenic patients may be beneficial for arthroplasty surgeons so that targeted nutritional counseling and exercises can be recommended prior to TKA.

Does design change in total knee arthroplasty implants affect patient-reported outcomes?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the early results of patient-reported outcomes between two generations of a total knee system. METHODS: Between June 2018 and April 2020, 121 first-generation, cemented TKAs (89 patients) and 123 s-generation, cemented TKAs (98 patients) were performed by a single surgeon. Demographic and surgical data were collected from all patients. Starting at the 6-month follow-up, patient-reported outcome measures Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Reconstruction (KOOS-JR) and Knee Society (KS) clinical and radiographic scores were prospectively recorded. This study represents a retrospective review of these prospectively collected data. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic variables such as age, body mass index, gender and race. KOOS-JR and Knee Society (KS) scores improved significantly (p < 0.001) from their preoperative values in both device generations. There were no differences, pre-operatively, between the two groups in terms of KOOS-JR, KS functional, KS objective, patient satisfaction, and expectation scores; however, there were statistically significant (p < 0.001) lower values of KOOS-JR and KS functional scores for first versus second generation at 6 months (81 vs. 89 and 69 vs. 74, respectively). CONCLUSION: While significant improvement in KS objective, subjective, and patient satisfaction scores were noted with both knee systems, KOOS-JR and KS function scores were significantly higher at the early (6-month) follow-up in the second-generation group. Patients responded acutely to the design change as evidenced by significantly improved patient-reported outcome scores for the second generation.

Extensor Mechanism Disruption Remains a Challenging Problem.

BACKGROUND: Extensor mechanism disruption (EMD) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a devastating problem commonly treated with allograft or synthetic reconstruction. Understanding of reconstruction success rates and patient recorded outcomes is lacking. METHODS: Patients who have an EMD after TKA undergoing mesh or whole-extensor allograft reconstruction between 2011 and 2019, with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed at two tertiary care centers. Functional failure was defined as extensor lag >30 degrees, amputation, or fusion, as well as revision extensor mechanism reconstruction (EMR). Survivorship was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and factors for success were determined with logistic regressions. RESULTS: Of fifty-six EMRs (49 patients), 50.0% (28/56) were functionally successful at 3.2 years of mean follow-up (range, 0.2 to 7.4). In situ survivorship of the reconstructions at 36 months was 75.0% (42 of 58). There were 50.0% (14 of 28) of functionally failed EMRs that retained their reconstruction at last follow-up. Mean extensor lag among successes and failures was 5.4 and 71.0° (P = .01), respectively. Mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement scores were 67.1 and 48.8 among successes and failures (P = .01). There were 64.0% (16 of 25) of successes and 1 of 19 failures that obtained a Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement score above the minimum patient-acceptable symptom state for TKA. Survivorship and success rates were similar between reconstruction methods (P = .86; P = .76). All-cause mortality was 8.2% (4 of 49), each with EMR failure prior to death. All-cause reoperation rate was 42.9% (24 of 56), with a 14.3% (8 of 56) rate of revision EMR and 10.7% (6 of 56) rate of above-knee-amputation or modular fusion. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter investigation of mesh or allograft EMR demonstrated modest functional success at 3.2 years. Complication and reoperation rates were high, regardless of EMR technique. Therefore, EMD after TKA remains problematic.

Effects of veterans' mental health service-connections on patient-reported outcomes following total joint arthroplasty.

Background: Studies report poor outcomes of elective orthopaedic surgeries among civilian patients receiving Workers' Compensation (WC). However, little is known about surgical outcomes in veterans receiving similar benefits through the Veterans Affairs (VA) service-connected (SC) disability compensation program. Methods: Veterans undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a VA Medical Center between 07/2019-12/2021 were analyzed by SC status. Outcomes were evaluated using Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) scores collected preoperatively and at 2- and 12-months postoperatively. Repeated measures mixed models were used to test for the effect of SC on HOOS-JR/KOOS-JR scores, controlling for baseline age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). SC and baseline joint function (stratified into quartiles using baseline HOOS-JR/KOOS-JR scores) were analyzed for effects on achieving substantial clinical benefit (SCB) at 12-month follow-up. Results: The analysis included 67 hips and 142 knees. SC and non-SC (NSC) veterans had similar baseline HOOS-JR/KOOS-JR and CCI. HOOS-JR remained similar between groups through 12 months (79.9 ± 19.2 vs. 82.7 ± 18.8) as did KOOS-JR (70.4 ± 15.6 vs. 74.6 ± 15.3). The designation of any SC and mental health SC reached significance for KOOS-JR (P = 0.034 and P = 0.032, respectively). For HOOS-JR and KOOS-JR, baseline function score quartile significantly influenced final score (P < 0.001), with patients in the lowest quartiles (i.e., worst baseline function) exhibiting significantly greater improvements than patients in higher quartiles. Conclusions: Mental health SC and high preoperative functional status are variables that may have unfavorable influences on self-reported outcomes of TKA in veteran patients. SC status does not appear to influence the outcomes of THA or the likelihood of achieving SCB after either THA or TKA. Regardless of SC status, most veterans can expect significant clinical improvements after total joint arthroplasty.

Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty : a multicentre study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. METHODS: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and > two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). CONCLUSION: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589-595.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Functional Assessment Using a Marker-Less Image Capture System in End-Stage Knee Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Patient self-assessment of knee function in end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has become standard for defining disability. The relationship of PROMs to functional performance requires a continued investigation. The purpose of this study was to determine correlations between patient demographics, PROMs, and functional performances using a marker-less image capture system (MICS). METHODS: Patients indicated for elective TKA completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and an office-based functional assessment using a MICS. Patient age, body mass index (BMI), and gender were collected. A total of 112 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 65.0 (±9.7) years, mean BMI was 32.5 (±6.6) kg/m2, and mean KOOS-JR was 14.5 (±5.7). The relationships between patient characteristics, KOOS-JR, MICS Alignment (coronal), MICS Mobility (flexion), and composite Total Joint scores were described using Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: BMI was weakly correlated with KOOS-JR (ρ = -0.22, P = .024), whereas age was not. Age and BMI were not correlated with performance scores. There were weak to no correlations between KOOS-JR and MICS Alignment (ρ = -0.01, P = .951), Mobility (ρ = 0.33, P < .001), and Total Joint scores (ρ = 0.06, P = .504). CONCLUSION: This study found no strong correlation between KOOS-JR and functional performance using a validated MICS for patients with end-stage knee OA. Further study is warranted in determining the relationship between PROMs and performance to optimize outcomes of patients undergoing nonoperative or surgical interventions for knee OA. The use of high-fidelity functional assessment tools that can be integrated into clinical workflow, such as the MICS used in this study, should permit PROM/functional performance comparisons in large populations.

The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Are Minimum Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Necessary for Accurate Assessment of Patient Outcomes After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: The two-year minimum follow-up after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) required by most academic journals is based on implant survivorship studies rather than patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic placed an unprecedented burden on patients and staff and halted asymptomatic surveillance clinic visits to minimize exposure. The purpose of this study was to determine if clinically meaningful differences were observed in PROMs beyond one year after TKA. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on prospectively collected PROMs after 1093 primary TKAs at a suburban academic center. PROMs related to pain, function, activity level, and satisfaction were compared by subsequent follow-up intervals preoperatively, at 4 months, 1 year, and minimum 2 years using paired data analysis techniques. RESULTS: Pain with level walking and while climbing stairs improved from preoperative levels to 4-month, 1-year, and minimum 2-year follow-up. The University of California Los Angeles activity level and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement improved over the same intervals. Patient satisfaction improved over postoperative follow-up intervals (84.0%, 87.3%, and 90.9%). While PROMs improved with statistical and clinical significance preoperatively to 4-month to 1-year follow-up, improvements from 1-year to minimum 2-year follow-up were small and did not reach minimum clinically important differences for nearly all PROMs, demonstrating significant overlap of the 95% confidence intervals. CONCLUSION: While long-term follow-up after TKA remains important for implant survivorship, it appears that one-year PROMs are as clinically reliable and meaningful as two-year PROMs. Therefore, it is reasonable to question the currently accepted 2-year minimum follow-up requirement used in peer-reviewed research involving PROMs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Development and Validation of Crosswalks Between the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The wide variety of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess outcomes following total joint arthroplasty can present a substantial methodological obstacle when attempting to compare information across studies or between institutions. A simple solution is to create crosswalks that reliably convert scores between patient-reported outcome measures. Our goal is to create and validate crosswalks between the commonly used Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and short-form versions of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (HOOS JR)/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS JR.). METHODS: Patients in our joint replacement registry were included if they underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (n = 4649) or total knee arthroplasty (n = 3750) for osteoarthritis between May 2007 and February 2012. We used their preoperative and 2-year postoperative HOOS scores (n = 6351) or KOOS scores (n = 4688) to generate the patients' WOMAC and HOOS JR/KOOS JR scores. The equipercentile equating method was applied to create 10 crosswalks: HOOS JR/KOOS JR to WOMAC Total (WOMAC-T), and WOMAC-T, WOMAC Pain (WOMAC-P), WOMAC Stiffness (WOMAC-S), and WOMAC Function (WOMAC-F) to HOOS JR/KOOS JR. Crosswalk validity was assessed by comparing actual and derived scores using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients in a bootstrapped cohort. RESULTS: All 10 crosswalks showed strong positive correlations ranging from 0.846 (WOMAC-S to KOOS JR) to 0.981 (HOOS JR to WOMAC-T). CONCLUSION: We created and validated 10 crosswalks between WOMAC and HOOS JR/KOOS JR. We recommend using the crosswalks between WOMAC-T and HOOS JR/KOOS JR when possible, as they demonstrated the highest correlation. WOMAC-F or WOMAC-P should be used in favor of WOMAC-S if only subscores are available. The HOOS JR/KOOS JR should only be converted to a WOMAC-T. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Presence of back pain prior total knee arthroplasty and its effects on short-term patient-reported outcome measures.

PURPOSE: Back pain may both decrease patient satisfaction after TKA and confound outcome assessment in satisfied patients. Our primary objective was to determine whether preoperative back pain is associated with differences in postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 234 primary TKA patients who completed PROMs preoperatively and 12 weeks postoperatively, which included a back pain questionnaire, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Cohorts were defined based on the severity of preoperative back pain (none, mild, moderate and severe) and compared. Demographics were compared using ANOVA and Chi-square analysis. Univariate ANCOVA analysis was utilized to compare PROMs while accounting for significant demographic differences. RESULTS: Both preoperative KOOS JR scores (none: 47.90, mild: 47.61, moderate: 44.61 and severe: 38.70; p = 0.013) and 12-week postoperative KOOS JR scores (none: 61.24, mild: 64.94, moderate: 57.48 and severe: 57.01; p = 0.012) had a statistically significant inverse relationship with regard to the intensity of preoperative back pain. Although FJS-12 scores at the 12-week postoperative period trended lower with increasing levels of preoperative back pain (p = 0.362), it did not reach statistical significance. Patients who reported severe back pain preoperatively achieved the largest delta improvement from baseline compared to those with lesser pain intensity (p = 0.003). Patients who had a 2-grade improvement in their back pain achieved significantly higher KOOS JR scores 12 weeks postoperatively compared to patients with either 1-grade or no improvement (63.53 vs. 55.98; p = 0.042). Both preoperative (47.99 vs. 41.11; p = 0.003) and 12-week postoperative (64.06 vs. 55.73; p < 0.001) KOOS JR scores were statistically higher for those who reported mild or no back pain pre-and postoperatively than those who reported moderate or severe back pain pre-and postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Knee pain and back pain both exert negative effects on outcome instruments designed to measure pain and function. Although mean improvement from pre- to postoperative KOOS JR scores for patients with severe pre-existing back pain was higher than their counterparts, this statistical difference is likely not clinically significant. This implies that all patients may experience similar benefits from TKA despite the presence or absence of back pain. Attempts to measure TKA outcomes using PROMs should seek to control for lumbago and other sources of body pain. Level of Evidence IIIRetrospective Cohort Study.

KOOS-JR Demonstrates Psychometric Limitations in Measuring Knee Health in Individuals After ACL Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Measurement properties of the short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-JR) are not established in individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the KOOS-JR measures the construct of knee health in individuals post-ACLR using Rasch analysis. HYPOTHESIS: The KOOS-JR will fit the Rasch model, but significant ceiling effects will be present. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Rasch analysis of the KOOS-JR from 166 individuals 10 months post-ACLR was conducted. Unidimensionality, a key criterion of the Rasch model, was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. Model fit of the rating scale, items, and persons were evaluated. Mean square fit statistics ≥1.6 and standardized z-scores ≥2.0 were indicative of person or item misfit. Additionally, reliability indicators including person reliability and separation indices were examined. RESULTS: The KOOS-JR fit the criteria of unidimensionality. All items demonstrated model fit; however, ceiling effects were noted (n = 36; 22%). Person reliability was low (0.47). Calculation of person strata revealed that the KOOS-JR did not separate participants into more than 1 stratum. The mean person measure was 3.56 logits higher than the mean item measure, indicating that this sample is skewed toward increased knee health. CONCLUSION: Although the KOOS-JR represented a unidimensional construct with items and persons fitting the Rasch model, several limitations were noted: ceiling effects, low person reliability, and poor person differentiation. Ceiling effects indicate that many individuals in this sample experienced better knee health than the KOOS-JR items were able to measure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Evaluating the measurement properties of the KOOS-JR is necessary to determine its clinical value in sports medicine. In later stages after ACLR recovery, administration of the KOOS-JR may not be adequate.

Evaluating instrument responsiveness in joint function: The HOOS JR, the KOOS JR, and the PROMIS PF CAT.

12345Responsiveness is the ability to detect change over time and is an important aspect of measures used to detect treatment effects. The purpose of this study was to assess the responsiveness of the HOOS JR, the KOOS JR, and the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) computerized adaptive test (CAT) in a joint reconstruction practice. 983 patients were evaluated for joint conditions between 2014 and 2017 in an orthopaedic clinic and completed the three instruments at baseline and 3 and/or 6-month follow-up visits. Average age was 61.03 years (SD = 12.33, Range = 18-90 years) and the majority of the patients were White (n = 875, 89.0%). Three-month responsiveness was calculated two ways, as between 80 and 100 days and as 90 days and beyond. Six-month responsiveness was calculated as 170-190 days and as 180 days and beyond. All changes from baseline scores were significant at the 3-, >3-, and >6-month follow-up (p < 0.05). All three measures showed large effect sizes, ranging from 0.80-1.20 at each time-point. The standardized response mean was large for each measure and at each time-point (Range = 1.06-1.53). This study demonstrated the responsiveness of the HOOS JR, KOOS JR, and the PROMIS PF in adult reconstruction patients. The PROMIS PF was consistently the most responsive instrument in this analysis. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The HOOS JR, KOOS JR, and PROMIS PF are useful clinical instruments for assessing treatment change and may be selected as relevant to the specific needs and conditions of the adult joint reconstruction patient population. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1178-1184, 2018.