Clinical performance of the Roche Cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 & influenza A/B assay: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Respiratory tract infections caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza viruses are persistent and critical. The Cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 & influenza A/B assay (Multiplex Liat), the FDA-authorized point-of-care reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay, has a turnaround time of 20 min and high accuracy. This study evaluates the pooled performance of this assay to provide practical information. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023467579). A systematic literature search was conducted within PubMed, Ovid-EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for articles evaluating the accuracy of the Multiplex Liat assay through September 2023. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled diagnostic values with real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) as a reference test. A total of 4,705 samples from eight studies were included in the primary meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of Multiplex Liat were 100.0 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 96.7 %-100.0 %) and 99.7 % (95 % CI = 98.7 %-99.9 %), respectively. The presence of variants of concern or in-house rRT-PCR assays as reference standards did not significantly affect the pooled diagnostic performance of the Multiplex Liat. When 5,333 samples from nine studies were assessed for sensitivity, the pooled sensitivity was 100.0 % (95 % CI = 85.8 %-100.0 %) without a significant difference. This meta-analysis demonstrates the usefulness of Multiplex Liat for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 based on pooled diagnostic values. These practical findings may facilitate appropriate settings for the diagnosis and management of patients with respiratory tract infections.

Clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection on the cobas Liat using water gargle samples.

Spring water gargle (SWG) is a suitable, non-invasive, alternative specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-PCR. This study sought to evaluate the performance of the cobas Liat point-of-care system for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in SWG samples. SWG samples and standard oral and nasopharyngeal swab (ONPS) were collected simultaneously from participants in a COVID-19 screening clinic, in November and December 2020. Both sample types were analyzed in parallel on the cobas Liat platform and with the Seegene Allplex 2019-nCoV assay. Among the 110 participants, 53% had compatible symptoms and 71% had a contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case. Only two (1.8%) individuals had neither symptoms nor contact. Amongst 110 paired samples, 25 (23%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the cobas Liat for a least one sample type, with a kappa coefficient of 0.92. Agreement between the cobas Liat platform and the Seegene assay was also excellent (kappa coefficient values of 0.94 and 0.95). Two SWG samples failed to provide a positive result when their ONPS pair was positive, but their cycle threshold (Ct) values were >35 on the Seegene assay, reflecting a low viral load. Overall, the performance of the cobas Liat platform is excellent for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in SWG samples in a high pre-test probability population.

Comparison between the analytical sensitivity and clinical performance of two cobas SARS-CoV-2 tests based on high-throughput and point-of-care systems.

Objectives: This study examined analytical sensitivity, specificity, and the clinical performance in detecting SARS-CoV-2 of the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test based on the high-throughput Cobas 6800 system and the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test based on the point-of-care cobas Liat system. Methods: The commercial reagents containing SARS-CoV-2 RNA subgenomes were diluted for assessing the sensitivity of the RT-qPCR assay. 385 nasopharyngeal swab specimens taken from contacts of COVID-19 cases were tested for the SARS-CoV-2 detection with both Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Tests. Results: In analytical sensitivity assays, the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test on the Liat system had a lower limit of detection (12.5-25 copies/mL) than the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test on the cobas 6800 system (25-50 copies/mL). In clinical performance assays, the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test demonstrated 89.36% (42 out of 47) PPA (positive percent agreement) and 98.82% (334 out of 338) NPA (negative percent agreement) compared to the results of the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B test. Among five discordant specimens, four had the positive result of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test, but the negative result of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test. Moreover, these discordant specimens had the Ct values of greater than 33 for the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test, implying a very small number of virions in the samples. Remarkably, four specimens with a presumptive positive result of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test had been confirmed by the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test. Next, the scatter plots of the Ct values showed a highly positive correlation between cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test (R-squared value = 0.954-0.962). Conclusions: Both SARS-CoV2 tests of the cobas 6800 and Liat systems produce reliable high throughput and point-of-care assays respectively for the early virus detection and the personal care decision-making during COVID-19 pandemic.

Verification of lateral flow antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 by qPCR directly from the test device.

OBJECTIVE: Fast and reliable detection of infection is a key to control the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Lateral flow antigen tests (LFATs) are inexpensive, easy to use, but have to be verified, as they are rather unspecific and can produce both, false positive and false negative results. Our objective was to combine the speed of LFAT for SARS-CoV-2 with the reliability of qPCR tests. METHODS: A serial dilution of a patient sample positive for SARS-CoV-2 was prepared and added to LFAT wells from two manufacturers. After evaluation, the devices were opened, the strips removed and extracted in a solution. Amplification was performed using point of care PCR systems (cobas® Liat®, ID NOW™) or on a LightCycler after extraction by MagNAPure 96. RESULTS: The nucleic acid amplification systems yielded higher sensitivity to LFAT. Thus, all samples determined positive by LFAT from the serial dilution were also positive in the subsequent amplification reactions. Sensitivity using extracted eluates was 10-100 times higher. SIGNIFICANCE: The usage of LFAT is highly recommended for single samples in emergency dental or emergency clinical settings, for smaller cohorts, or even for larger population screening, as it is inexpensive and fast. Positive results can be conveniently verified directly from the test devices using either point of care test equipment or more complex laboratory equipment thus making a major impact on efficient management of infections and isolations.

Rapid and Safe Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Virus RNA Using Onsite Quantitative PCR Diagnostic Testing From Clinical Specimens Collected in Molecular Transport Medium.

BACKGROUND: The ability to rapidly detect severe accurate respiratory syndrome coronavirus virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza virus infection is vital for patient care due to overlap in clinical symptoms. Roche's cobas® Liat® SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Test used on the cobas Liat was granted approval under the Food and Drug's Emergency Use Authorization for nasopharyngeal (NP) and nasal swabs collected in viral/universal transport medium (VTM/UTM). However, there is a critical need for media that inactivates the virus, especially when specimens are collected in decentralized settings. This study aimed to investigate the use of PrimeStore Molecular Transport Medium® (PS-MTM®), designed to inactivate/kill and stabilize RNA/DNA for ambient transport and preprocessing of collected samples. METHODS: A limit of detection (LOD) using serially diluted SARS-CoV-2 RNA in PS-MTM and routine UTM was established using standard quantitative PCR (qPCR). Additionally, a clinical panel of NP and oral swabs collected in PS-MTM during the 2020 coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic were evaluated on the cobas Liat and compared to "gold standard" qPCR on an ABI-7500 instrument. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 RNA LOD using standard qPCR was equivalent on the cobas Liat instrument. cobas Liat detection from oral/NP swabs in PS-MTM media exhibited equivalent positive percent agreement (100%) and negative percent agreement (96.4%). CONCLUSION: PS-MTM and the Roche cobas Liat are compatible and complimentary devices for respiratory specimen collection and rapid disease detection, respectively. PS-MTM is equivalent to standard VTM/UTM with the added benefit of safe, noninfectious sample processing for near-patient testing.

The Ligand of Ate1 is intrinsically disordered and participates in nucleolar phase separation regulated by Jumonji Domain Containing 6.

The Ligand of Ate1 (Liat1) is a protein of unknown function that was originally discovered through its interaction with arginyl-tRNA protein transferase 1 (Ate1), a component of the Arg/N-degron pathway of protein degradation. Here, we characterized the functional domains of mouse Liat1 and found that its N-terminal half comprises an intrinsically disordered region (IDR) that facilitates its liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in the nucleolus. Using bimolecular fluorescence complementation and immunocytochemistry, we found that Liat1 is targeted to the nucleolus by a low-complexity poly-K region within its IDR. We also found that the lysyl-hydroxylase activity of Jumonji Domain Containing 6 (Jmjd6) modifies Liat1, in a manner that requires the Liat1 poly-K region, and inhibits its nucleolar targeting and potential functions. In sum, this study reveals that Liat1 participates in nucleolar LLPS regulated by Jmjd6.

Clinical Performance of the Point-of-Care cobas Liat for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 20 Minutes: a Multicenter Study.

Highly accurate testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at the point of care (POC) is an unmet diagnostic need in emergency care and time-sensitive outpatient care settings. Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) technology is the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. We performed a multisite U.S. study comparing the clinical performance of the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized POC RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 20 min, the cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B nucleic acid test, to the most widely used RT-PCR laboratory test, the cobas 68/8800 SARS-CoV-2 test. Clinical nasopharyngeal swab specimens from 444 patients with 357 evaluable specimens at five U.S. clinical laboratories were enrolled from 21 September 2020 to 23 October 2020. The overall agreement between the Liat and 68/8800 systems for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics was 98.6% (352/357). Using Liat, positive percent agreement for SARS-CoV-2 was 100% (162/162) and the negative percent agreement was 97.4% (190/195). The Liat is an RT-PCR POC test that provides highly accurate SARS-CoV-2 results in 20 min with performance equivalent to that of high-throughput laboratory molecular testing. Rapid RT-PCR testing at the POC can enable more timely infection control and individual care decisions for coronavirus disease 2019.

Point-of-care tests for influenza A and B viruses and RSV in emergency departments - indications, impact on patient management and possible gains by syndromic respiratory testing, Capital Region, Denmark, 2018.

BackgroundPoint-of-care tests (POCT) for influenza A and B viruses and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were implemented in emergency departments of all hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark in 2018.AimTo establish whether POC testing for influenza viruses or RSV is based on a valid respiratory symptom indication, whether changes in patient management based on a positive result are safe and whether syndromic POC testing may benefit patients with influenza or RSV.MethodsSamples from 180 children (< 18 years) and 375 adults tested using POCT between February and July 2018 were retested for 26 respiratory pathogens. Diagnosis, indication for POC testing, hospitalisation time, antimicrobial therapy and readmission or death within one month of testing were obtained from patient records.ResultsA valid indication for POC testing was established in 168 (93.3%) of children and 334 (89.1%) of adults. A positive POCT result significantly reduced antibiotic prescription and median hospitalisation time by 44.3 hours for adults and 14.2 hours for children, and significantly increased antiviral treatment in adults. Risk of readmission or death was not significantly altered by a positive result. Testing for 26 respiratory pathogens established that risk of coinfection is lower with increasing age and that POCT for adults should be restricted to the influenza and RSV season.ConclusionPositive POCT resulted in changed patient management for both children and adults, and was deemed safe. POCT for additional pathogens may be beneficial in children below 5 years of age and outside the influenza and RSV season.

Evaluation of cobas Influenza A/B & RSV Test for Diagnosis of Equine Influenza.

A rapid and sensitive diagnostic method is needed to help prevent the spread of equine influenza virus. The cobas Influenza A/B & RSV test for the cobas Liat system (Roche Diagnostics) is based on real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and is designed to broadly detect influenza A virus RNA within 20 minutes. It detected a broad range of equine influenza virus strains, and detected equine influenza virus RNA from nasal swabs of infected horses at the same level as real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, although it returned some invalid results (7.7%). This suggests that cobas Influenza A/B & RSV test is highly sensitive to equine influenza virus, but should be improved to reduce the rate of invalid results.

Evaluation of the Liat Cdiff Assay for Direct Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxin Genes within 20 Minutes.

Clostridioides difficile is the main causative agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Prompt diagnosis is required for initiation of timely infection control measures and appropriate adjustment of antibiotic treatment. The cobas Cdiff assay for use on the cobas Liat system enables a diagnostic result in 20 minutes. A total of 252 prospective (n = 150) and retrospective (n = 102) stool specimens from The Netherlands, France, and Switzerland were tested on the cobas Cdiff assay using the Xpert C. difficile assay as a reference method. The overall positive and negative percent agreement (PPA and NPA, respectively) of the cobas Cdiff assay compared with the Xpert C. difficile assay was 98.0% (100/102; 95% confidence interval [CI], 93.1% to 99.5%) and 94.0% (141/150; 95% CI, 89.0% to 96.8%), respectively. When comparing the PPAs of cobas Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile with culture, the results were 91.7% (55/60; 95% CI, 81.9% to 96.4%) and 85.0% (51/60; 95% CI, 73.9% to 91.9%), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. The cobas Cdiff assay offers a very rapid alternative for diagnosing C. difficile infection. The 20-minute turnaround time provides the potential for point-of-care testing so that adequate infection control measures can be initiated promptly.

Analytical and clinical evaluation of a point-of-care molecular diagnostic system and its influenza A/B assay for rapid molecular detection of the influenza virus.

Recently, rapid molecular detection systems have been used for point-of-care testing for the diagnosis of influenza worldwide. Here, we evaluated the performance of the cobas Liat system and the cobas Influenza A/B assay (Liat) using fresh nasopharyngeal samples collected from a Japanese population between December 2017 and February 2018. The performance of the examination was compared with that of antigen testing and a conventional polymerase chain reaction (nested-PCR) method. A total of 159 patients were included in this study, and 77 tested positive using Liat. The concordance rate between Liat and nested PCR was 97.5%. The median time between the ordering of testing and completion of molecular analyses using Liat was 30 min (interquartile range: 28-35 min). The overall sensitivity and specificity of antigen testing were 57.1% and 100%, respectively. The duration from symptom onset to examination did not alter antigen testing sensitivity. The current study demonstrates the high performance of Liat for the rapid molecular identification of the influenza virus.

Diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of group a streptococcal pharyngitis in children in a primary care setting: impact of point-of-care polymerase chain reaction.

BACKGROUND: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the recommended 2-step rapid antigen detection test (RADT) with confirmatory culture vs the point-of-care (POC) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Roche cobas® Liat® Strep A test for detection of group A Streptococcus (GAS) in pediatric patients with pharyngitis, and to investigate the impact of these tests on antibiotic use in a large pediatric clinic. METHODS: This prospective, open-label study was conducted at a single site during fall/winter 2016-2017. A total of 275 patients aged 3 to 18 years with symptoms of pharyngitis had a throat-swab specimen analyzed using RADT, POC PCR, and culture. The sensitivity, specificity, and percentage agreement (95% CI) between assays and a laboratory-based nucleic acid amplification test were calculated. DNA sequencing was used to adjudicate discrepancies. The RADT or POC PCR result was provided to clinicians on alternating weeks to compare the impact on antibiotic use. RESULTS: A total of 255 samples were evaluated; 110 (43.1%) were GAS positive. Sensitivities (95% CI) for POC PCR, RADT, and culture were 95.5% (89.7-98.5%), 85.5% (77.5-1.5%), and 71.8% (62.4-80.0%), respectively. Specificities (95% CI) for POC PCR, RADT, and culture were 99.3% (96.2-99.98%), 93.7% (88.5-97.1%), and 100% (97.5-100%), respectively. Compared with RADT, POC PCR resulted in significantly greater appropriate antibiotic use (97.1% vs 87.5%; P = .0065). CONCLUSION: Under real-world conditions, RADT results were less specific and culture results were less sensitive than found in established literature and led to increased rates of inappropriate antibiotic use. POC PCR had high sensitivity and specificity and rapid turnaround times, and led to more appropriate antibiotic use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ID number ISRCTN84562679 . Registered October 162,018, retrospectively registered.

Prospective evaluation of three rapid molecular tests for seasonal influenza in patients presenting at an emergency unit.

BACKGROUND: For infection control measures, rapid accurate diagnostics on admission of patients with suspected seasonal influenza is crucial. OBJECTIVE: Prospective comparison of three rapid molecular tests for detection of influenza A/B RNA. STUDY DESIGN: Outpatients presenting at the Medical emergency department of Graz University Hospital with influenza-like illness and a requirement for hospitalization (n = 312) were studied. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected with the 3 mL-version of the UTM™ Viral Transport Medium (Copan). Specimens were tested for influenza A and B RNA using the Alere™ i Influenza A & B (Abbott), the cobas® Influenza A/B (Roche), and the Xpert® Xpress Flu/RSV (Cepheid) tests. Results were compared to those obtained from the same specimen by the Influenza A/B R-GENE® (bioMerieux) test based on real-time PCR as reference method. RESULTS: Overall sensitivities of the Abbott, Roche, and Cepheid tests were 90.5%, 96.0%, and 97.0%, overall specificities 99.4%, 97.6%, and 98.2% respectively. With the Abbott and the Cepheid tests, all specimens gave valid results, while the Roche test showed invalid results in 37 (12.1%) specimens. Total time to result for the Abbott, Roche, and Cepheid tests was 18 min, 22 min, and 32 min respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Abbott test lacked sensitivity, the Roche test was impaired by a high number of invalid results. Overall, despite the longest total time to result, the Cepheid test showed the best performance to detect influenza virus RNA in symptomatic patients presenting at an emergency unit in this study.

Assessment of Test Performance and Potential for Environmental Contamination Associated with a Point-of-Care Molecular Assay for Group A Streptococcus in an End User Setting.

Although U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved and CLIA-waived point-of-care (POC) molecular systems are being implemented in routine clinical practice, instrument reliability, test performance in the hands of end users, and the potential for environmental contamination resulting from use of POC molecular systems have not been extensively evaluated. We performed a prospective evaluation of the Roche cobas Liat group A streptococcus (GAS) assay compared to routine real-time PCR. We evaluated test accuracy, instrument failure rate, and monitored for environmental contamination when testing was performed by minimally trained end users in an Express Care Clinic environment. The overall concordance of the Liat GAS assay with routine testing was 97.2% (455/468). The average Liat failure rate across three analyzers was 6.6% (33/501) (range, 3.7 to 11.6%), and no environmental contamination was detected during the course of the study. The cobas Liat platform and GAS assay demonstrated reliable performance in the end user setting and may serve as a rapid, POC option for routine diagnostic testing for certain infectious diseases, including GAS.

A novel PCR-based point-of-care method facilitates rapid, efficient, and sensitive diagnosis of influenza virus infection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this single-centre study was the comparative analysis of the GeneXpert (Cepheid Inc.) and the LIAT (Roche) system for the rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based detection of influenza A (IA) and influenza B (IB) viruses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the 2017-2018 flu season, 651 prospectively collected samples (throat and nasal swabs) of patients with symptoms of influenza-like illness or acute respiratory infection were tested for the presence of IA and IB viruses using the GeneXpert and LIAT systems. To evaluate the usefulness for near-patient testing, a LIAT system was installed at the Department of Emergency Medicine, and sample testing was performed on site. Reference testing of all samples was performed with the Xpert Flu assay and for 313 samples in addition with the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) assay at the central laboratory. Analysis of all samples was carried out within 24 hr after collection. RESULTS: Overall, 267 of the 651 samples analysed were positive for influenza viruses in at least one of the three assays investigated (IA, 88; IB, 179). The overall rates of agreement between the LIAT assay and the Xpert Flu assay was 96.0% for the detection of IA and IB viruses. The sensitivity and specificity of the LIAT assay compared to the Xpert Flu assay for the detection of IA was 98.80% (95% confidence interval (CI) 93.47-99.97%) and 99.12% (95% CI, 97.96% to 99.71%) and for the detection of IB 98.76% (95% CI 95.58-99.85%), and 96.33% (95% CI 94.26-97.81%), respectively. The LIAT assay showed a statistically significant higher detection rate of IB virus than the Xpert Flu assay (p <0.01). No significant difference was found between the detection rate of the LIAT assay and the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV assay. The mean time to the availability of a definite test result was significantly shorter with the on-site LIAT system than the GeneXpert system (mean 59 min saving time; p <0.01). CONCLUSION: The LIAT system represents a robust and highly sensitive point-of-care device for the rapid PCR-based detection of influenza A and influenza B viruses.

Clinical decision making in the emergency department setting using rapid PCR: Results of the CLADE study group.

BACKGROUND: Emergency Departments (ED) are challenged during influenza season by patients who present acutely during sporadic ED visits. ED management is largely empiric, often occurring without reliable diagnostics needed for targeted therapies, safe outpatient discharge, or hospital admissions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the influenza diagnosis on physician decision making during ED visits using the Cobas Liat® influenza A + B assay. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study assessing the impact of rapid (<30 min), reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) influenza testing on physician decision making in the ED. Physician responses established pre-and post-diagnosis management courses which required confirmation via secondary documentation in the medical record. Changes in physician decision making were analyzed across four clinical touchpoints: (i) admission/discharge status, (ii) medical procedures, (iii) antiviral and antibiotic prescribing, and (iv) laboratory studies. RESULTS: An influenza diagnosis changed patient management courses, relative to empiric, pre-diagnosis plans, in in 61% of the cases resulting in cost savings of $49,420-to-$42,270 over 143 patients and 104 days during influenza season resulting in a cost savings of $200.40/ED visit. Evaluation over 2000 ED patient visits projects cost savings > $578,000 due to deferred admissions, and reduction in antiviral prescribing. Sensitivity of ED-based influenza testing using the Cobas Liat® assay was equivalent to centralized lab testing at 98.8% sensitivity and 98.5% specificity respectively. CONCLUSION: Providing rapid, RT-PCR influenza testing to ED settings is actionable and used to guide patient care decisions. Understanding the cascade of events linked to the influenza diagnosis in the ED provides overall cost savings which offset the cost of providing ED-based testing.

Diagnostic accuracy of the real-time PCR cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay and the Alere i Influenza A&B NEAR isothermal nucleic acid amplification assay for the detection of influenza using adult nasopharyngeal specimens.

BACKGROUND: Accurate detection of influenza requires diagnostic testing; however, methods such as RADTs and central laboratory-based tests are limited by low sensitivity and time constraints, respectively. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performances of the cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B and Alere™ i Influenza A&B point-of-care (POC) assays for detecting influenza A and B viruses using fresh nasopharyngeal specimens with the GenMark Dx® Respiratory Viral Panel as the reference method, a FDA cleared IVD PCR test. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 87 samples collected in viral transport medium from adults ≥18 years of age were re-tested on both POC assays (based on the reference PCR method, 29 were influenza A and 18 were influenza B virus positive). RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of the cobas Influenza A/B for the detection of influenza A and B relative to reference PCR was 97.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.9%, 99.6%) and 97.5% (95% CI: 87.1%, 99.6%), respectively, while the sensitivity of the Alere i Influenza A&B assay relative to the reference PCR method was 63.8% (95% CI: 49.5%, 76.0%) and the specificity was 97.5% (95% CI: 87.1%, 99.6%). The individual sensitivities and specificities of the cobas Influenza A/B assay for influenza A alone and influenza B alone were comparable to those of the reference PCR method (influenza A: sensitivity of 100% [95% CI: 88.3%, 100.0%] and specificity of 98.3% [95% CI: 90.9%, 99.7%]; influenza B: sensitivity of 94.4% [95% CI: 74.2%, 99.0%] and specificity of 100% [95% CI: 94.7%, 100.0%]). For the Alere i Influenza A&B assay, the individual specificities for influenza A and B were comparable to those of the reference PCR method (98.3% [95% CI: 90.9%, 99.7%] and 97.1% [95% CI: 90.0%, 99.2%], respectively), while the individual sensitivities were low relative to reference PCR (55.2% [95% CI: 37.5%, 71.6%] and 72.2% [95% CI: 49.1%, 87.5%], respectively). CONCLUSION: The cobas Influenza A/B assay demonstrated performance equivalent to laboratory-based PCR, and could replace rapid antigen tests.

Lab-in-a-tube: Real-time molecular point-of-care diagnostics for influenza A and B using the cobas® Liat® system.

Rapid diagnosis of influenza A and B is important for direct treatment decisions in patient care and for the reduction of in-hospital transmissions. The new real-time PCR based molecular point-of-care (POC) assay, the cobas® Influenza A/B test on the cobas® Liat® System (cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay), generated a PCR result in less than 20 min, was evaluated for the detection of influenza A and B. One hundred twenty-one retrospectively collected respiratory specimens, previously analyzed with a routine influenza A/B test (Diagenode) were tested using the cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay. The cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay allows influenza A and B testing by RT-PCR within 20 min. This assay detected influenza A in 51 of 56 samples positive by the Diagenode test. The five discrepant results were retested with the Cepheid Influenza A/B test, confirming two positive cases. All 30 influenza B Diagenode positive samples were found positive by the cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay. Control samples (viral negative and non-influenza pathogens) were all negative by the cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay. The cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay showed a sensitivity for influenza A/B of 96% and 100%, respectively, and 100% specificity for both targets. The cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay is a useful tool for accurate, rapid, and sensitive detection of influenza A and B, offering timely and personalized patient management and infection control when implemented at the point-of-care.

Accurate Detection of Streptococcus pyogenes at the Point of Care Using the cobas Liat Strep A Nucleic Acid Test.

The performance of a polymerase chain reaction-based point-of-care assay, the cobas Strep A Nucleic Acid Test for use on the cobas Liat System (cobas Liat Strep A assay), for the detection of group A Streptococcus bacteria was evaluated in primary care settings. Throat swab specimens from 427 patients were tested with the cobas Liat Strep A assay and a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) by existing medical staff at 5 primary care clinics, and results were compared with bacterial culture. The cobas Liat Strep A assay demonstrated equivalent sensitivity (97.7%) and specificity (93.3%) to reference culture with a 15-minute turnaround time. In comparison to RADTs, the cobas Liat Strep A assay showed improved sensitivity (97.7% Liat vs 84.5% RADT). The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-waived cobas Liat Strep A assay demonstrated the ease of use and improved turnaround time of RADTs along with the sensitivity of culture.