ABSTRACT
Waterfowls, such as ducks, are natural hosts of avian influenza virus (AIV) and can genetically limit the pathogenicity. On the other hand, some AIV strains cause severe pathogenicity in chickens. It is suggested that differences in the pathogenicity of AIV infection between waterfowls and chickens are related to the expression of retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I), a pattern recognition receptor that chickens evolutionally lack. Here, we knocked-in the duck RIG-I bearing the T2A peptide sequence at the 3' region of the Mx, an interferon-stimulated gene (ISG), in chicken embryo fibroblast cells (DF-1) using the precise integration into target chromosome (PITCh) system to control the duck RIG-I expression in chickens. The expression patterns of the duck RIG-I were then analyzed using qPCR. The knocked-in DF-1 cells expressed RIG-I via the stimulation of IFN-ß and poly(I:C) in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, poly(I:C) stimulation in the knocked-in DF-1 cells upregulated RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) family signaling pathway-related genes IFN-ß, OASL, and IRF7. The IFN-ß-dependent expression of RIG-I and upregulation of IFN-ß in the poly(I:C) stimulation demonstrated a positive-feedback loop via RIG-I, usually evident in ducks. Overall, this novel strategy established RIG-I-dependent immune response in chickens without overexpression of RIG-I and disruption of the host genes.
ABSTRACT
Mutations, serving as the raw materials of evolution, have been extensively utilized to increase the chances of engineering molecules or microbes with tailor-made functions. Global and targeted mutagenesis are two main methods of obtaining various mutations, distinguished by the range of action they can cover. While the former one stresses the mining of novel genetic loci within the whole genomic background, targeted mutagenesis performs in a more straightforward manner, bringing evolutionary escape and error catastrophe under control. In this review, we classify the existing techniques of targeted mutagenesis into two categories in terms of whether the diversity is generated in vitro or in vivo, and briefly introduce the mechanisms and applications of them separately. The inherent connections and development trends of the two classes are also discussed to provide an insight into the next generation evolution research.
ABSTRACT
Repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) is influenced by the chemical complexity of the lesion. Clustered lesions (complex DSBs) are generally considered more difficult to repair and responsible for early and late cellular effects after exposure to genotoxic agents. Resection is commonly used by the cells as part of the homologous recombination (HR) pathway in S- and G2-phase. In contrast, DNA resection in G1-phase may lead to an error-prone microhomology-mediated end joining. We induced DNA lesions with a wide range of complexity by irradiation of mammalian cells with X-rays or accelerated ions of different velocity and mass. We found replication protein A (RPA) foci indicating DSB resection both in S/G2- and G1-cells, and the fraction of resection-positive cells correlates with the severity of lesion complexity throughout the cell cycle. Besides RPA, Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) was recruited to complex DSBs both in S/G2- and G1-cells. Resection of complex DSBs is driven by meiotic recombination 11 homolog A (MRE11), CTBP-interacting protein (CtIP), and exonuclease 1 (EXO1) but seems not controlled by the Ku heterodimer or by phosphorylation of H2AX. Reduced resection capacity by CtIP depletion increased cell killing and the fraction of unrepaired DSBs after exposure to densely ionizing heavy ions, but not to X-rays. We conclude that in mammalian cells resection is essential for repair of complex DSBs in all phases of the cell-cycle and targeting this process sensitizes mammalian cells to cytotoxic agents inducing clustered breaks, such as in heavy-ion cancer therapy.