Efficacy, safety, and acceptability of polyethylene glycol 3350 without electrolytes vs magnesium hydroxide in functional constipation in children from six months to eighteen years of age: A controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: There are few studies that compare polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 and magnesium hydroxide (MH), as long-term treatment of functional constipation (FC) in children, and they do not include infants as young as 6 months of age. Our aim was to determine the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of PEG vs MH in FC, in the long term, in pediatric patients. METHODS: An open-label, parallel, controlled clinical trial was conducted on patients from 6 months to 18 years of age, diagnosed with FC, that were randomly assigned to receive PEG 3350 or MH for 12 months. Success was defined as: ≥ 3 bowel movements/week, with no fecal incontinence, fecal impaction, abdominal pain, or the need for another laxative. We compared adverse events and acceptability, measured as rejected doses of the laxative during the study, in each group and subgroup. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with FC were included. There were no differences in success between groups (40/41 PEG vs 40/42 MH, p = 0.616). There were no differences in acceptability between groups, but a statistically significant higher number of patients rejected MH in the subgroups > 4 to 12 years and > 12 to 18 years of age (P = .037 and P = .020, respectively). There were no differences regarding adverse events between the two groups and no severe clinical or biochemical adverse events were registered. CONCLUSIONS: The two laxatives were equally effective and safe for treating FC in children from 0.5 to 18 years of age. Acceptance was better for PEG 3350 than for MH in patients above 4 years of age. MH can be considered first-line treatment for FC in children under 4 years of age.

Membrane electrolysis for the removal of Mg2+ and Ca2+ from lithium rich brines.

Lithium is today an essential raw material for renewable energy technologies and electric mobility. Continental brines as present in the Lithium Triangle are the most abundant and the easiest to exploit lithium sources. Lithium is present in diluted concentrations together with different ions, and it is imperative to fully remove both magnesium and calcium before lithium carbonate can be precipitated. Here we use membrane electrolysis as a novel method to generate hydroxyl groups in situ in a two-chamber electrochemical cell with a side crystallizer, omitting the need for chemical addition and not leading to substantial loss of lithium rich brine. Batch electrolysis experiments fully removed more than 99.99% of both Mg2+ and Ca2+ for three different native South-American brines treated at current densities ranging from 27 to 350 A m-2 (final concentrations were below ICP detection limit: < 0.05 mg L-1). For a brine containing 3090 mg L-1 of Mg2+ and 685 mg L-1 of Ca2+, 62 kWh m-3 are needed for the full removal of both cations when a current density of 223 A m-2 is employed. Most importantly, the Li+ concentration in the brine is not affected. The removed cations are precipitated as Mg(OH)2 and Ca(OH)2. Our process has the potential to simultaneously recover lithium, magnesium, and calcium compounds, minimizing waste production.

Comparison of the efficacy of oral versus intravascular magnesium in the prevention of hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia after cabg

Abstract Objective: Cardiac arrhythmias are a common challenge following open-heart surgeries. Hypomagnesemia is believed to be correlated with this condition. Prophylactic intravenous magnesium supplementation has been practiced for a long time in patients undergoing CABG. This study was designed in an attempt to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous routes in the prevention of hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia. Methods: In this interventional clinical study, 82 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. All patients were evaluated for baseline serum magnesium level and arrhythmias. One group received 1,600 mg of oral magnesium hydroxide through nasogastric (NG) tube prior to surgery, while the other group received 2 g of magnesium sulfate during the induction of anesthesia. The serum magnesium level was monitored for 48 hours after the operation. The difference in preoperative hypomagnesemia was non-significant (Sig: 0.576). Results: During the operation, the serum magnesium level peaked around 4 mg/dL, and no hypomagnesemia was detected in any patient. Although the curve of oral group declined parallel and below that of intravenous (IV) group, no significant differences were detected during postoperative monitoring. In addition, a prevalence of arrhythmia of 13.9% and 6.5% was noticed in IV and oral groups, respectively (OR: 0.428). Conclusion: Providing 1,600 mg of oral magnesium supplement to patients is as effective as 2,000 mg of magnesium sulfate IV in preventing hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia after CABG. Thus, the authors introduce this treatment regimen as a promising and cost-effective method.

Farmacovigilancia de interacciones medicamentosas en pacientes afiliados al sistema de salud de Colombia / Drug surveillance of medication interactions in patients affiliated to the health system in Colombia

Objetivos: determinar las posibles interacciones medicamentosas que generen problemas relacionados con medicamentos de seguridad, necesidad o efectividad, mediante la búsqueda activa en bases de datos de pacientes afiliados al Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud.Métodos: a partir de las bases de datos de dispensación de medicamentos deAudifarma S.A, a unos 3,7 millones de usuarios del país, se hizo una revisiónsistemática de estadísticas de una serie de medicamentos identificados porpresentar interacciones.Resultados: del total de pacientes que tomaban omeprazol se encontró que 12,3 porciento recibían concomitantemente hidróxido de magnesio mas aluminio; 1,7 porciento recibían ranitidina; 1,0 porciento sucralfato, además 0,3 porciento tomaban simultáneamente omeprazol+ sucralfato + hidróxido de magnesio y aluminio y 0,4 porciento omeprazol + ranitidina + hidróxido de magnesio y aluminio, que no potencian el efecto antiulceroso o pueden antagonizar sus acciones. También se halló que el 0,2 porciento de pacientes que tomaban verapamilo recibían al mismo tiempo digoxina o metil digoxina con riesgo de aumentar la toxicidad y antagonizar el efecto inotrópico. Todos los casos fueron notificados a los responsables de su atención sanitaria.Discusión: interacciones medicamentosas representan un riesgo potencial, el cual debe ser tenido en cuenta por los médicos prescriptores. La fármacovigilancia permite optimizar recursos y prevenir eventos adversos que puedan potencialmente causar morbilidad o letalidad. Se recomienda considerar la búsqueda en bases dedatos para reforzar los programas de vigilancia de uso de medicamentos en el país.

Objectives: to determine the possible medication interactions that generateproblems related to safety medications, needs or effectiveness, throughout theactive search in data bases of patients affiliated to the General Health System of Social Security. Methods: based on the data base from Audifarma S.A. in regards to the distribution of medications to 3.7 million of users in the country, a systematic review of thestatistics of a series of drugs identified for presenting interactions. Results: out of the total of patients that were taking omeprazol, it was found that 12.3% at the same time received magnesium hydroxide plus aluminum; 1.7%received ranitidine; 1.0% sucralfate, and also 0.3% were at the same time taking omeprazol + sucralfate+magnesium hydroxide and aluminum and 0.4% omeprazol + ranitidine+magnesium hydroxide and aluminum, which do not maximize the anti ulcerous effect or may antagonize its actions. It was also found that 0.2% of the patients was taking verapamil and at the same time received digoxin or methyl digoxin with the risk of increasing the toxicity and antagonizing its inotropic effect. All these cases were notified to those responsible for their sanitary attention. Discussion: medication interactions represent a potential risk, which has to be considered by the prescribing doctors. Drug surveillance allows the optimization of resources and the prevention of adverse events which may potentially cause mortality or be lethal. It is recommended that data bases be searched in order to reinforce the surveillance programs in relation to the use of medicines in the country.