Error traps in patients with congenital heart disease undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Patients with congenital heart disease are living longer due to improved medical and surgical care. Congenital heart disease encompasses a wide spectrum of defects with varying pathophysiology and unique anesthetic challenges. These patients often present for noncardiac surgery before or after surgical repair and are at increased risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. Although there is no singular safe anesthetic technique, identifying potential error traps and tailoring perioperative management may help reduce morbidity and mortality. In this article, we discuss five error traps based on the collective experience of the authors. These error traps can occur when providing perioperative care to patients with congenital heart disease for noncardiac surgery and we present potential solutions to help avoid adverse outcomes.

Do nursing students' altruism levels affect their attitudes toward medical errors? A cross-sectional study.

AIM: The aim of the current research is to determine nursing students' levels of altruism, attitudes towards medical errors and the effect of altruism on attitudes towards medical errors. BACKGROUND: Nursing students should be aware of medical errors and have an attitude towards correcting them. Professional values play an essential role in changing, shaping and developing attitudes in nursing students. Altruism is one of the most important determining professional values in students' professional success and development of attitudes towards different situations. DESING: This study is a descriptive and cross-sectional study. METHODS: The research was conducted in the Nursing Department of a state university in Turkey and the study population consisted of 2nd, 3rd and 4th year nursing students (N=375) who were continuing their education and clinical practice in the spring semester of the 2022-2023 academic year. The study was completed with 321 students. The data were collected online using the information form, the Altruism Scale and the Scale of Attitudes Towards Medical Errors via Google Forms between 01 and 31 May 2023. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Independent-Samples t-test, One-Way ANOVA test, Pearson's correlation analysis and simple linear regression. RESULTS: Students had a mean score of 69.68 (range 40-98) on the Altruism Scale and 3.82 (range 2.38-4.56) on the Scale of Attitudes Towards Medical Errors. A significant, very weak positive correlation was found between the Altruism Scale and the total mean scores of the Attitudes Towards Medical Errors Scale (p=0.001). Altruism was found to have a significant effect on attitude towards medical errors (p=0.001). The explanatory power of the regression model was 0.101 and altruism explained 10.1 % of the students' attitudes towards medical errors scores. CONCLUSIONS: Students have positive attitudes towards medical errors, high awareness of the importance of medical errors and error reporting and above average levels of altruism. Altruism has a positive effect on attitudes towards medical errors.

Patient reported medication-related problems, adherence and waste of oral anticancer medication over time.

OBJECTIVES: Patients on oral anticancer therapy regularly experience medication-related problems (MRPs), potentially leading to non-adherence and medication waste. Most studies reporting these experiences have cross-sectional designs. The aim of our study was to explore patient reported MRPs, adherence and waste of oral anticancer medication over time. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal quantitative interview study with 4 months follow-up was performed among patients on oral anticancer medication (mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitors, (anti)hormonal therapy, pyrimidine antagonists) using a semi-structured questionnaire. Patients from two Dutch university medical centres were included from March to December 2022 after informed consent was given. Four interviews were performed with 1 month in between. All interviews were audiotaped, after which the data were entered into an electronic case report form. The primary outcome was the mean number of MRPs per patient per interview round. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with at least one MRP, types of MRPs, perceived non-adherence, medication waste (both in general and specifically for anticancer medication), costs of anticancer medication waste, and factors associated with medication waste as mentioned by the patient. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Forty patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 64 (9) years; 43% were male. The mean number of MRPs per patient was 2.1 in the first interview and 1.2, 1.0 and 0.9 in the second, third and fourth interviews, respectively. Adverse drug reactions were the most frequently reported type of MRPs (30 (75%) patients in the first interview and 19 (65%) in the last interview). Unintentional non-adherence was regularly reported, especially in the first interview. Medication changes were frequent and associated medication waste was mentioned in all interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients using oral anticancer treatment report MRPs and this number remains substantial over time.

Patient Safety Domains in Primary Healthcare: A Systematic Review.

Background: Healthcare systems should ensure the provision of quality services to patients without harming them. However, the provision of services is occasionally accompanied by harm or complications, most of which are preventable. Most studies have focused on secondary healthcare rather than primary healthcare (PHC). Thus, this study aimed to identify various dimensions and components of patient safety in PHC worldwide. Methods: This systematic review study was conducted in November 2022 based on PRISMA reporting guidelines. Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE and searched for English documents using the keywords "patient safety" and "PHC" from 2000 to 2022. Finally, two reviewers extracted the data independently and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results: Overall, 23 out of the initially 4937 identified articles were selected for the final analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most of these studies used a qualitative-quantitative approach (61.9%, seven studies for both), and 64% had been conducted in European countries. Eventually, five dimensions and 22 components were identified for patient safety in PHC, including management measures, quality management, resources and technology, documents, and patient-related factors. Conclusion: The patient safety dimensions and components identified in this research can help develop a clear definition of patient safety and its assessment standards and criteria in PHC. Considering that most previous studies on patient safety in PHC were conducted in European and developed countries, it is suggested that researchers conduct more studies in developing countries to fill this research gap.

Cost-effectiveness of preoperative pharmaceutical care consultations: a 5-year analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative medication errors can be prevented by screening patients through a preoperative pharmaceutical care consultation. The aim of this study was to analyse the cost-effectiveness of implementing such a consultation and to determine which patients would benefit most. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted that included all patients who underwent a preoperative pharmacy consultation between 2016 and 2020. During this consultation, two part-time pharmacists reviewed patients' appropriate preoperative chronic medication management. All prevented errors were collected and classified by therapeutic group and type of error. A team of pharmacists and anaesthetists assigned to each prevented medication error a probability of causing an adverse event 'p', following the methodology of Nesbit et al by establishing five different 'p' values: 0, 0.01, 0.1, 0.4, and 0.6. 'p' = 1 was not considered. The cost of an adverse event was determined to be between €4124 and €6946 according to current literature, and a sensitivity analysis was performed by increasing the interval by 20% above and below. The cost of employing two part-time specialist pharmacists was estimated to be €59 142. Savings per medication error prevented were calculated as (€4124 OR €6946) × 'p'. Total savings were the sum of all costs associated with prevented medication errors. Patients on chronic medications who were in therapeutic groups with a 0.6 probability of an adverse event or who were in therapeutic groups responsible for 50% of the prevented adverse events were considered prioritisable. RESULTS: 3105 patients attended the consultation and 1179 medication errors were prevented, corresponding to 300 adverse events. 42.2% of the errors had a 'p' of 0.4. The costs avoided by this consultation ranged from €1 237 200 to €2 083 800, while the cost of its implementation was €295 710. The cost-effectiveness ratio was between €4.2 and €7.0 saved per euro invested. In the sensitivity analysis, the ratios ranged from €3.3 to €8.5 per euro invested. Fifteen different therapeutic groups accounted for 90% of the medication errors prevented. The therapeutic groups 'Agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system', 'Antidiabetics, non-insulin (excluding SGLT2)' and 'Antithrombotics: low molecular weight heparins' were responsible for 56% of the prevented adverse events. The therapeutic groups 'Antidiabetics: rapid-acting insulin' and 'Antithrombotic agents: vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparins, or direct oral anticoagulants' had a 'p' of 0.6. Therefore, patients in six therapeutic groups should be prioritised for preoperative pharmacy counselling. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of preoperative pharmaceutical care consultations in Spain has proven to be cost-effective. Incorporating the probability of a medication error causing an adverse event allowed the prioritisation of patients for these consultations. Patients taking anticoagulants, oral antidiabetics, rapid-acting insulins, and agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system benefited the most. This study could serve as a basis for implementing such consultations in other hospitals, as they are effective in reducing the cost of medication errors in surgical patients.

Disclosure of medical errors and untoward events involving gametes and embryos: an Ethics Committee opinion.

Medical providers have an ethical duty to disclose clinically significant errors involving gametes and embryos. Although not mandatory, disclosure of errors causing no harm or near misses is recommended. In addition, clinics should have written policies in place for reducing and disclosing errors.

AI and XAI second opinion: the danger of false confirmation in human-AI collaboration.

Can AI substitute a human physician's second opinion? Recently the Journal of Medical Ethics published two contrasting views: Kempt and Nagel advocate for using artificial intelligence (AI) for a second opinion except when its conclusions significantly diverge from the initial physician's while Jongsma and Sand argue for a second human opinion irrespective of AI's concurrence or dissent. The crux of this debate hinges on the prevalence and impact of 'false confirmation'-a scenario where AI erroneously validates an incorrect human decision. These errors seem exceedingly difficult to detect, reminiscent of heuristics akin to confirmation bias. However, this debate has yet to engage with the emergence of explainable AI (XAI), which elaborates on why the AI tool reaches its diagnosis. To progress this debate, we outline a framework for conceptualising decision-making errors in physician-AI collaborations. We then review emerging evidence on the magnitude of false confirmation errors. Our simulations show that they are likely to be pervasive in clinical practice, decreasing diagnostic accuracy to between 5% and 30%. We conclude with a pragmatic approach to employing AI as a second opinion, emphasising the need for physicians to make clinical decisions before consulting AI; employing nudges to increase awareness of false confirmations and critically engaging with XAI explanations. This approach underscores the necessity for a cautious, evidence-based methodology when integrating AI into clinical decision-making.

Exploring susceptibility factors to medication dispensing errors through a retrospective study of patient-reported dispensing errors over 11 years: are dispensing errors indeed due to personal reasons for pharmacists?

BACKGROUND: Medication dispensing errors cause wastage of medicines and increase healthcare costs, with serious consequences for patients. However, few studies have systematically and completely reviewed dispensing errors, with inadequate attention to the objective regularity and risk factors for dispensing errors. OBJECTIVES: To explore the potential causes and risk factors influencing the prevalence of medication dispensing errors. METHODS: We collected patient-reported medication dispensing errors from a large tertiary care hospital in South China over 11 years. We assessed the characteristics of dispensing errors, labelled the causes, compared them with more than 25 million prescriptions from 2012 to 2022, identified the susceptibility factors for the occurrence of dispensing errors, and analysed the characteristics and patterns of the errors. RESULTS: A total of 376 patient-reported dispensing errors were recorded. It took an average of 5.2 days for a patient to find an error. Only 37.5% of errors were reviewed by the patient within 24 hours. These errors directly contributed to a medication loss of US$188 406. Of the 160 recorded pharmacists, 112 (70%) committed dispensing errors. Dispensing errors were affected by the pharmacists' use of the machine, workload and the length of monthly vacation. Of the dispensing errors, 47.9% (n=180) were caused by medication packaging or names that were similar. Antibiotics (n=32, 8.5%) were the most common types of drugs dispensed incorrectly, and traditional Chinese medicines (n=31, 8.2%) and immunosuppressants (n=21, 5.6%) were the most likely to be dispensed in inaccurate quantities. CONCLUSIONS: Organising adequate staff and using machines to prepare medicines may be necessary to reduce dispensing errors. When pharmacists have been away from work for more than 72 hours they should find their rhythm in other positions before dispensing medicines. It is more important to prioritise the differentiation of medicines with similar packaging over those with similar names when arranging drug shelving.

Adverse events at the end of life of hospital patients with or without a condition relevant for palliative care: a nationwide retrospective record review study in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is crucial for quality of care. Preventable adverse events (AEs) occur in 1 of 20 patients in the hospital, but it is unknown whether this is different for patients with a condition relevant for palliative care. The majority of the limited available research on this topic is only focused on patients already receiving palliative care, and do not make comparisons with other patients at the end-of-life. We identified and compared the prevalence, preventability, nature and causes of AEs in patients with and without a condition relevant for palliative care. METHODS: A nationwide retrospective record review study was performed in 20 Dutch hospitals. A total of 2,998 records of patients who died in hospital in 2019 was included. Records were reviewed for AEs. We identified two subgroups: patients with (n = 2,370) or without (n = 248) a condition relevant for palliative care through the selection method of Etkind (2017). Descriptive analyses were performed to calculate prevalence, nature, causes and prevention strategies. T-tests were performed to calculate differences between subgroups. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between subgroups regarding AE prevalence, this was 15.3% in patients with a condition relevant for palliative care, versus 12.0% in patients without a condition relevant for palliative care (p = 0.148). Potentially preventable AE prevalence was 4.3% versus 4.4% (p = 0.975). Potentially preventable death prevalence in both groups was 3.2% (p = 0.938). There were differences in the nature of AEs: in patients with a condition relevant for palliative care this was mostly related to medication (33.1%), and in patients without a condition relevant for palliative care to surgery (50.8%). In both subgroups in the majority of AEs a patient related cause was identified. For the potentially preventable AEs in both subgroups the two most important prevention strategies as suggested by the medical reviewers were reflection and evaluation and quality assurance. DISCUSSION: Patient safety risks appeared to be equally prevalent in both subgroups. The nature of AEs does differ between subgroups: medication- versus surgery-related, indicating that tailored safety measures are needed. Recommendations for practice are to focus on reflecting on AEs, complemented with case evaluations.

Nurses' experiences of reporting the medical errors of their colleagues: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Medical error is a leading cause of disability and death in healthcare settings and reporting colleagues' medical errors is one of the main strategies for medical error management and an ethical responsibility of all healthcare providers, including nurses. Most studies into reporting colleagues' medical errors used quantitative designs while it seems that using qualitative designs can provide better insight in this area. PURPOSE: This study explored nurses' experiences of reporting the medical errors of their colleagues. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted using the conventional content analysis approach. Participants were 22 hospital nurses purposively selected in 2021-2022 from different cities in Iran. Twenty-two in-depth semi-structured interviews were held for data collection. The data were analyzed via Graneheim and Lundman's conventional content analysis and trustworthiness was maintained using the criteria proposed by Guba and Lincoln. FINDINGS: The main categories of the study were burnout and intention to leave the profession and growth and development. The two subcategories of the first category were the experience of injury and the experience of violence and the two subcategories of the second category were sense of worthiness and sense of motivation. Moral distress was the most important experience of almost all participants. CONCLUSION: Nurses mostly have negative experiences in terms of reporting their colleagues' medical errors. Negative experiences can act as the barriers to report colleagues' errors while positive experiences can act as its facilitators. Improvement of the patient safety culture in healthcare settings and interpersonal relationships among healthcare providers can reduce the negative experiences and promote the positive experiences of reporting colleagues' medical errors.

Factors associated with self-reported medical errors among undergraduate health science students in southern Ethiopia.

Introduction: Medical errors are not uncommon, but they are seldom reported. Patient safety practices are among the key areas for service improvement. This study aimed to assess factors associated with self-reported medical errors among undergraduate health science students in southern Ethiopia. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among health science students of Arba Minch University in 2018. The sample size was calculated using a single population proportion formula. A total of 287 medical students in their fourth year and above, nursing and midwifery students in their second year and above, and other health science students in their third year and above were included. Results: The majority (82.1, 95%CI: 77.63-86.67) of the study participants had a 'good' knowledge score on patient safety. Approximately 62.5% (95%CI: 56.8-68.2) of the participants had a 'favorable' patient safety attitude. Only 38.6% (95%CI: 32.8-44.3) of the study participants had 'good' patient safety practices. At adjusted analysis, the practical attachment unit, having ever managed a patient independently, having ever witnessed harm to patients by colleagues or other healthcare workers, and having ever witnessed harm to a close friend or family member were statistically significantly associated with self-reported medical errors. Participants who were doing their practical clinical attachment in the surgical and obstetric units were three times more likely to self-report medical errors as compared to those practicing in the pediatrics, internal medicine, and other units (AOR = 2.72, 95%CI: 1.16-6.39.97). Students who had never managed a patient independently were less likely to self-report medical error (AOR = 0.24, 95%CI: 0.08-0.72). The odds of self-reporting medical errors were less among among participants who had not ever witnessed harm to patients by colleagues or other healthcare workers (AOR = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.05-0.29) and participants who had not ever witnessed harm to a close friend or family member (AOR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.16-0.80). Conclusion: One in five of the participants reported having harmed patients while practicing. Most of the students had good patient safety knowledge, while approximately two-thirds of the participants had a favorable attitude toward patient safety. Only 38.6% of the study participants had good patient safety practices. Having worked in surgical and obstetrics units, having managed a patient independently, and having witnessed harm to a patient were associated with self-reporting of medical errors.

A potentially lifesaving error: unintentional high-dose adrenaline administration in anaphylaxis-induced cardiac arrest; a case report.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a crucial skill for emergency medical services. As high-risk-low-frequency events pose an immense mental load to providers, concepts of crew resource management, non-technical skills and the science of human errors are intended to prepare healthcare providers for high-pressure situations. However, medical errors occur, and organizations and institutions face the challenge of providing a blame-free error culture to achieve continuous improvement by avoiding similar errors in the future. In this case, we report a critical medical error during an anaphylaxis-associated cardiac arrest, its handling and the unexpected yet favourable outcome for the patient. CASE PRESENTATION: During an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to chemotherapy-induced anaphylaxis, a patient received a 10-fold dose of epinephrine due to shortcomings in communication and standardization via a central venous port catheter. The patient converted from a non-shockable rhythm into a pulseless ventricular tachycardia and subsequently into ventricular fibrillation. The patient was cardioverted and defibrillated and had a return of spontaneous circulation with profound hypotension only 6 min after the administration of 10 mg epinephrine. The patient survived without any residues or neurological impairment. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates the potential deleterious effects of shortcomings in communication and deviation from standard protocols, especially in emergencies. Here, precise instructions, closed-loop communication and unambiguous labelling of syringes would probably have avoided the epinephrine overdose central to this case. Interestingly, this serious error may have saved the patient's life, as it led to the development of a shockable rhythm. Furthermore, as the patient was still in profound hypotension after administering 10 mg of epinephrine, this high dose might have counteracted the severe vasoplegic state in anaphylaxis-associated cardiac arrest. Lastly, as the patient was receiving care for advanced malignancy, the likelihood of termination of resuscitation in the initial non-shockable cardiac arrest was significant and possibly averted by the medication error.

Patient safety culture and medication safety in European intensive care units: a focus group study.

BACKGROUND: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are susceptible to medication errors (MEs) for many reasons, including the complexity and intensity of care. Little is known about patient safety culture, its relationship to medication safety, and ME prevention strategies used in ICUs. This study explored the attitudes of healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in ICUs or within medication safety towards patient safety culture, medication safety, and factors influencing implementation of ME prevention strategies in ICUs across Europe. METHODS: This qualitative study employed focus group discussions; ethical approval was obtained. Invitations to participate were distributed to HCPs working in ICUs or as medication safety officers across Europe. In May 2022, online focus group discussions were conducted. Discussions were transcribed verbatim and analysed. The framework analysis employed was inductive, systematic and transparent, and completed through a collaborative and iterative process. RESULTS: Three nurses and 11 pharmacists, from seven different countries, participated in three focus group discussions. There was a sense of improvement in blame culture leading to more open culture, although it was not the case for all participants. Blame culture, when present, was thought to be prevalent among more senior ICU staff and hospital managers. Facilitators for improving medication safety included communicating with HCPs and providing feedback on MEs and ME prevention strategies, interprofessional working without hierarchies, and having a 'good' culture and environment. Barriers included lack of engagement of HCPs and their attitudes towards medication safety, and an existing blame culture. Participants reported 25 different ME prevention strategies in use including: assessing knowledge; teaching and training; auditing practice; incident reporting; and involvement of pharmacists. CONCLUSIONS: This study examined the attitudes of HCPs on patient safety culture and medication safety in the ICU setting in Europe and gained their insight into facilitators and barriers to the implementation of ME prevention strategies to improve medication safety.

Patient safety incidents in Irish general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory practice level analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is defined as the prevention of harm to patients and aims to prevent errors. This analysis explores factors associated with the reported occurrence of patient safety incidents (PSIs) in general practices in Ireland at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The PRICOV-19 was a cross-sectional study to record the (re)organisation of care provided in general practice and changes implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38 countries. Primary outcomes include three potential scenarios of PSIs: delayed care due to practice factors, delayed care due to patient factors, and delayed care due to triage. Exploratory variables included demographic and organisational characteristics, triage, collaboration, and strategies to safeguard staff members' well-being. RESULTS: Of the 172 participating Irish general practices, 71% (n = 122) recorded at least one potential PSI. The most frequent incident was delayed care due to patient factors (65%), followed by practice (33%) and triage (30%). Multivariate analysis showed that delayed care due to patient factors was associated with changes in the process of repeat prescriptions (OR 6.7 [CI 95% 2.5 to 19.6]). Delayed care due to practice factors was associated with suburbs/small towns (OR 4.2 [1.1 to 19.8]) and structural changes to the reception (OR 3.5 [1.2 to 11.4]). While delayed care due to patient factors was associated with having a practice population of 6000-7999 patients (OR 4.7 [1.1 to 27.6]) and delayed care due to practice factors was associated with having a practice population of 2000-3999 patients (OR 4.2 [1.2 to 17.1]). No linear associations were observed with higher or lower patient numbers for any factor. Delayed care due to triage was not associated with any exploratory variables. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in dramatic changes in the delivery of care through general practices in Ireland. Few factors were associated with the reported occurrence of PSIs, and these did not show consistent patterns. Sustained improvements were made in relation to repeat prescriptions. The lack of consistent patterns, potentially confirms that the autonomous decisions made in general practice in response to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic could have benefitted patient safety (See Graphical abstract).

A retrospective study of pet owners' complaints against veterinary practices in Türkiye (2012-2021).

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine in detail the complaints against veterinarians submitted by pet owners and evaluated by the Turkish Veterinary Medical Association in Türkiye, with the aim to create awareness among Turkish veterinarians about the nature of the complaints and how they might reduce the risk of making medical errors. SAMPLE: 127 files of complaints. METHODS: A total of 127 written complaints from pet owners filed between January 2012 and December 2021 were analyzed. The pet owners' complaints were subjected to a conventional content analysis to identify the primary, secondary, and tertiary themes. Each case was evaluated by a 3-level complaint-coding taxonomy. The first level included 3 domains (themes), namely clinical, management, and relationship, while the second level was ordered in a total of 7 subcategories of complaint types. Thereafter, the third-level minor themes were grouped into related subcategories. RESULTS: From 127 file complaints, 296 specific issues were identified. Of these, 62% were in the clinical domain, 24% in the management domain, and 14% about poor behavior of the attending veterinarians. The most common (43%) complaint was medical errors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An increased awareness of common medical errors should be promoted among Turkish veterinarians in order to reduce the risk of negligence and malpractice.

NRFit connectors in regional anaesthesia: avoiding medication errors.

The continuous development of medicine in most fields requires physicians to apply the latest methods and technology to ensure patients' safety. In the field of anesthesiology we are pioneers in the application of measures that guarantee the security of our patients, making possible the greatest reduction in mortality seen among all other specialties. This objective has been achieved thanks to the introduction of changes such as the one presented in this review article. The specific NRFit® connections for neuraxial and other regional anesthesia applications prevent wrong route medication errors to occur. These medication errors have been related to a high morbidity and mortality rate. This article reviews this new technology based in our own two-year experience at Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias (Alcalá de Henares, Madrid) as well as a literature review using PubMed, UpToDate and ClinicalKey.

A Mathematical Model Based on Stratifying the Severity of Medical Errors for Building Scenarios for Clinical Cases With Branching.

Background There are no mathematical models or score systems available for assessing and creating clinical case simulations based on branching scenario scripts. Objective This study aimed to develop a mathematical model based on stratifying the severity of medical errors for building clinical cases with branching scenarios for clinical simulation. Methods This study was undertaken from August 2020 to August 2023. To build a mathematical model for building scenarios of clinical cases with branching, the classification of the seriousness of medication errors was used. A mathematical model was built for predicting and modeling the development of a clinical situation and as an assessment strategy. The study recruited a total of 34 participants, with 16 participants assigned to the branching scenarios without the mathematical model group and 18 participants assigned to the branching scenarios with the mathematical model group. Results A simple diagram of score based on stratification of the severity of medical errors and correct decisions in clinical practice for building interactive training scenarios with branching was proposed. According to this score system algorithm, each clinical decision-making step is scored points with plus or minus, from 0 to 10. The sum of the points for each block in the decision-making process is then added up. Each step in the overall clinical decision-making strategy is stratified by the proposed algorithm, and finally, the results of internal validation and implementation are presented. Conclusion A mathematical model and score system for building clinical case scenarios based on branching and classification of the seriousness of medication errors was developed. This system could help in the prediction and modeling of the development of events in particular clinical situations and the assessment of competency formation in medical simulation as well.

The World Federation of Chiropractic Global Patient Safety Task Force: a call to action.

BACKGROUND: The Global Patient Safety Action Plan, an initiative of the World Health Organization (WHO), draws attention to patient safety as being an issue of utmost importance in healthcare. In response, the World Federation of Chiropractic (WFC) has established a Global Patient Safety Task Force to advance a patient safety culture across all facets of the chiropractic profession. This commentary aims to introduce principles and call upon the chiropractic profession to actively engage with the Global Patient Safety Action Plan beginning immediately and over the coming decade. MAIN TEXT: This commentary addresses why the chiropractic profession should pay attention to the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan, and what actions the chiropractic profession should take to advance these objectives. Each strategic objective identified by WHO serves as a focal point for reflection and action. Objective 1 emphasizes the need to view each clinical interaction as a chance to improve patient safety through learning. Objective 2 urges the implementation of frameworks that dismantle systemic obstacles, minimizing human errors and strengthening patient safety procedures. Objective 3 supports the optimization of clinical process safety. Objective 4 recognizes the need for patient and family engagement. Objective 5 describes the need for integrated patient safety competencies in training programs. Objective 6 explains the need for foundational data infrastructure, ecosystem, and culture. Objective 7 emphasizes that patient safety is optimized when healthcare professionals cultivate synergy and partnerships. CONCLUSIONS: The WFC Global Patient Safety Task Force provides a structured framework for aligning essential considerations for patient safety in chiropractic care with WHO strategic objectives. Embracing the prescribed action steps offers a roadmap for the chiropractic profession to nurture an inclusive and dedicated culture, placing patient safety at its core. This commentary advocates for a concerted effort within the chiropractic community to commit to and implement these principles for the collective advancement of patient safety.