Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 95
Filter
1.
medRxiv ; 2024 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39132476

ABSTRACT

Objective: A multitude of factors affect a hospitalized individual's blood glucose (BG), making BG difficult to predict and manage. Beyond medications well established to alter BG, such as beta-blockers, there are likely many medications with undiscovered effects on BG variability. Identification of these medications and the strength and timing of these relationships has potential to improve glycemic management and patient safety. Materials and Methods: EHR data from 103,871 inpatient encounters over 8 years within a large, urban health system was used to extract over 500 medications, laboratory measurements, and clinical predictors of BG. Feature selection was performed using an optimized Lasso model with repeated 5-fold cross-validation on the 80% training set, followed by a linear mixed regression model to evaluate statistical significance. Significant medication predictors were then evaluated for novelty against a comprehensive adverse drug event database. Results: We found 29 statistically significant features associated with BG; 24 were medications including 10 medications not previously documented to alter BG. The remaining five factors were Black/African American race, history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, prior BG (mean and last) and creatinine. Discussion: The unexpected medications, including several agents involved in gastrointestinal motility, found to affect BG were supported by available studies. This study may bring to light medications to use with caution in individuals with hyper- or hypoglycemia. Further investigation of these potential candidates is needed to enhance clinical utility of these findings. Conclusion: This study uniquely identifies medications involved in gastrointestinal transit to be predictors of BG that may not well established and recognized in clinical practice.

2.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2024 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39137973

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Several drug-drug interaction (DDI) checkers such as DDI-Predictor have been developed to detect and grade DDIs. DDI-Predictor gives an estimate of the magnitude of an interaction based on the ratio of areas under the curve. The objective of the present study was to analyse the frequencies of DDIs involving well-known strong interactors such as rifampicin and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), as reported by a clinical pharmacy team using DDI-Predictor, and the pharmacist intervention acceptance rate. METHODS: The pharmacist intervention rate and the physician acceptance rate were calculated for DDIs involving rifampicin or the SSRIs fluoxetine, paroxetine, duloxetine and sertraline. The rates were compared with a bilateral χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the 284 DDIs recorded, 38 (13.4%) involved rifampicin and 78 (27.5%) involved SSRIs. The pharmacist intervention rate differed significantly (68.4% for rifampicin vs 48.8% for SSRIs; p=0.045) but the physician acceptance rate did not (84.6% for rifampicin vs 81.6% for SSRIs; p=1). Pharmaceutical interventions for SSRIs were more frequent when the ratio of the area under the drug concentration versus time curve in DDI-Predictor was >2. Pharmacists were more likely to issue a pharmacist intervention for DDIs involving rifampicin because of a high perceived risk of treatment failure and were less likely to issue a pharmacist intervention for DDIs involving an SSRI, except when the suspected interaction was strong. CONCLUSIONS: DDI checkers can help pharmacists to manage DDIs involving strong interactors. DDIs involving strong inhibitors versus a strong inducer differ with regard to their intervention and acceptance rates, notably due to the estimation of the magnitude of the DDI.

3.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2024 Aug 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39122480

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Pharmaceutical interventions are proposals made by hospital clinical pharmacists to address sub-optimal uses of medications during prescription review. Pharmaceutical interventions include the identification of drug-related problems, their prevention and resolution. The objective of this study was to exploit a newly developed deep neural network classifier to identify drug-related problems from pharmaceutical interventions and perform a large retrospective descriptive analysis of them in a French university hospital over a 3-year period. METHODS: Data were collected from prescription support software from 2018 to 2020. A classifier running in Python 3.8 and using Keras library was then used to automatically categorise drug-related problems from pharmaceutical interventions according to the coding of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy. RESULTS: 2 930 656 prescription lines were analysed for a total of 119 689 patients. Among these prescription lines, 153 335 (5.2%) resulted in pharmaceutical interventions (n=48 202 patients; 40.2%). Pharmaceutical interventions were predominantly observed in patients aged 65 years or older (n=26 141 patients out of 53 186; 49.1%) and in patients taking five or more medications (44 702 patients out of 93 419; 47.8%). The most frequently identified types of drug-related problems associated with pharmaceutical interventions were 'Non-conformity to guidelines or contra-indication' (n=88 523; 57.7%), 'Overdosage' (16 975; 11.1%) and 'Improper administration' (13 898; 9.1%). The most frequently encountered drugs were: paracetamol (n=10 585; 6.9%), esomeprazole (6031; 3.9%), hydrochlorothiazide (2951; 1.9%), enoxaparin (2191; 1.4%), tramadol (1879; 1.2%), calcium (2073; 1.3%), perindopril (1950; 1.2%), amlodipine (1716; 1.1%), simvastatin (1560; 1.0%) and insulin (1019; 0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The deep neural network classifier used met the challenge of automatically classifying drug-related problems from pharmaceutical interventions from a large database without mobilising significant human resources. The use of such a classifier can lead to alerting caregivers about certain risky practices in prescription and administration, and triggering actions to improve patients' therapeutic outcomes.

4.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834286

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are potentially more vulnerable to medication errors than patients admitted to general wards. However, little is known about medication safety strategies used in European ICUs. Our objectives were to explore the strategies being used and being planned within European ICUs, to identify areas of variation, and to inform recommendations to improve medication safety in this patient group. METHODS: We distributed an online survey, in seven European languages, via professional networks and social media. The survey explored a range of medication safety strategies and whether they were in use (and if so, whether fully or partially implemented) or being planned. Demographic information about respondents and their ICUs was also captured. A descriptive analysis was conducted, which included exploring geographical variation. RESULTS: We obtained 587 valid responses from 32 different countries, with 317 (54%) completed by pharmacy staff. Medication safety practices most commonly implemented were patients' allergies being visible for all staff involved in their care (fully implemented in 382 (65%) of respondents' ICUs), standardised emergency medication stored in a fixed place (337, 57%), and use of standardised medication concentrations for commonly used intravenous infusions (330, 56%). Electronic prescribing systems were fully implemented in 310 (53%). A pharmacist was reported to be fully implemented in 181 (31%) of ICUs, of which there was 126 (70%) where there was a pharmacist review of all ordered medication five days per week. Critical care pharmacists were most common in Northern European ICUs (fully implemented to ICUs in 102, 50%) and electronic prescribing in Western Europe (108, 65%). CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in medication safety strategies used within European ICUs, both between and within geographical areas. Our findings may be helpful to ICU staff in identifying strategies that should be considered for implementation.

5.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2024 Jun 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925908

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In the Danish healthcare system, restructuring is an ongoing process to accommodate the rising number of patients and to optimise resource allocation. To ease departmental burdens at hospitals in the North Denmark Region, outpatients are empowered to collect their cost-free medicines from medication pick-up lockers. The lockers function similarly to a package box, thereby enhancing patient freedom. Due to lack of evidence within the published literature regarding cost-free medicines and medicine waste, the aim of our study was to identify the common medications delivered to medicine pick-up lockers and secondly, to evaluate potential medicine waste. METHODS: Data from ApoVision provided insights into medications delivered to medicine pick-up lockers from March to October 2023 in the North Denmark Region. To estimate unused medicines we obtained data on the number of medications returned from medicine pick-up lockers. RESULTS: From 2020 to 2023, the number of patients receiving cost-free medicines at medication pick-up lockers increased. In total, approximately 30 000 packages of medicine were delivered to medicine pick-up lockers from March to October 2023 in the North Denmark Region; 1.7% were returned. Methotrexate, adalimumab, and omalizumab were among the most common deliveries and were also the three most returned from the medicine pick-up lockers. CONCLUSIONS: This study is an initial attempt to investigate potential medicine waste in cost-free medicines dispensed to outpatients via pick-up lockers. Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents were the most common medicines delivered to medication pick-up lockers in the North Denmark Region from March to October 2023. In this period, approximately 2% of all delivered medicine packages were returned to the hospital pharmacy. Our analysis solely focuses on waste associated with medications left uncollected from medicine pick-up lockers. Addressing the impact of medicine waste in a hospital setting requires a comprehensive approach, thus future studies should also focus on other sites relevant for medication waste as, for example, the patient's household.

6.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844328

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify and promote hospital pharmacy initiatives to improve the management of patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) within the Spanish healthcare system. METHOD: A panel of experts comprising hospital pharmacists, an allergist and a nurse/member of the Spanish Hereditary Angioedema Association (Asociación Española de Angioedema Familiar) highlighted initiatives to improve care for patients with HAE after identifying, evaluating and prioritising them. Prioritisation was assessed based on the impact on patient care and the feasibility of their implementation on a scale of 1-5. RESULTS: Seven key areas of activity for the role of hospital pharmacists in the management of patients with HAE were identified: evaluation and selection of medicines; hospital pharmacy dispensation and telepharmacy; pharmacotherapy follow-up and telemedicine; coordination with other healthcare teams involved in the care of patients with HAE; patient health education and training; research on HAE; and continuous education and training of hospital pharmacy service personnel. Ten initiatives with a mean impact score of 5 and a mean feasibility score of ≥4.1 were considered as high-priority initiatives. Half of the initiatives belong to the area concerning patient education and training (50%), followed by care coordination initiatives (30%) and continuous education and training (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Ten high-priority initiatives for the management of patients with HAE were identified by a panel of experts. The implementation of such initiatives by the hospital pharmacy service should enhance the management of patients with HAE in the Spanish healthcare system.

7.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2024 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38897653

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To establish a clinical application monitoring system for proton pump inhibitors (PPI-MS) and to enhance the detection and intervention of inappropriate PPI use in adult hospitalised patients. METHODS: Natural language processing technology was applied to indication recognition of therapeutic PPI applications and the assessment of admission record recognition for preventive PPI applications. Symptom judgement was based on the tense-negation model and regular expressions. Evidence-based rules for clinical PPI application were embedded for the construction of PPI-MS. A total of 9421 patient records using PPI from July 2022 to July 2023 were analysed to validate the performance of the system and to identify common issues related to inappropriate clinical PPI use. RESULTS: Out of 9421 hospitalised patients detected using PPI, 4736 (50.27%) were used for prophylaxis and the rest for therapeutic use. Among the prophylactic medications, 2274 patients (48.02%) were identified as receiving inappropriate prophylactic PPI. The main reasons were inappropriate prophylaxis without indication. Additionally, 258 cases of inappropriate therapeutic PPI use were identified, mainly involving the use of esomeprazole for peptic ulcers and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. The efficiency of the PPI rational medication monitoring system, when coupled with human involvement, was 32 times that of manual monitoring. Among cases of inappropriate prophylactic PPI use, 45.29% were due to lack of indications, 28.34% involved inappropriate administration routes, 15.74% were related to inappropriate dosing frequencies and 10.62% were attributed to inappropriate drug selection. There were 933 cases related to the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs and 708 cases related to the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The overall accuracy of the PPI-MS system was 88.69%, with a recall rate of 99.33%, and the F1 score was 93.71%. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing a PPI medication monitoring system through natural language processing technology, while ensuring accuracy and recall rates, improves evaluation efficiency and homogeneity. This provides a new solution for timely detection of issues relating to clinical PPI usage.

8.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777391

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With a global annual carbon footprint of the healthcare sector of 2 gigatons of CO2e, healthcare systems must contribute to the fight against climate change. Hospital pharmacists could be key players in ecological transition due to their role in managing healthcare products. The aim of this study was to summarise the evidence on interventions implemented in healthcare facilities involving pharmacists to improve the environmental footprint of healthcare. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The Medline, Web of Science and ScienceDirect databases were searched for studies published between 2013 and 2023. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to include hospital pharmacists and present contributions aimed at reducing the environmental footprint of healthcare in healthcare facilities. Outcomes were the description of the contribution, the methods used and the stages of healthcare product lifecycle analysed. A Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the risk of bias for each study. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included. Pharmacists played a leading role in 15 (88%) and had a supporting role in the others. The healthcare products targeted were medicines (59%), medical devices (12%) or both (29%). The stages of the healthcare product cycle addressed by the contributions were elimination (71%), dispensing (35%), procurement and supply (35%), production (29%), and prescription (24%). Only two studies used life cycle assessment and only one assessed all three pillars of sustainability. Two studies had good methodological quality while the rest had at least one element of uncertainty. CONCLUSION: This review confirms the central role of the pharmacist and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in implementing eco-responsible actions. It could be useful to hospitals and other teams wanting to improve sustainable actions and it emphasises the importance of collaborating with pharmacists when planning sustainable initiatives. Future eco-responsible initiatives must use robust reproducible methods. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO #CRD42023406835.

9.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604615

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Medication errors (MEs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the healthcare system. Patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) are potentially more susceptible to MEs due to severity of illness, the complexity of treatments they receive and the challenging nature of the ICU setting. The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists established a Special Interest Group (SIG) to undertake a programme of work to develop and prioritise recommendations to support medication safety improvement in ICUs across Europe. METHODS: Initial policy recommendations for medication safety within the ICU environment were developed following reviews of the literature and engagement with relevant stakeholders. A Delphi panel of 21 members of the SIG, that comprised healthcare professionals (HCPs) with expertise in ICU and/or medication safety, was convened in 2022. We conducted two rounds using a modified Delphi technique whereby participants anonymously ranked on a 9-point Likert Scale the policy recommendations according to their priority for implementation. RESULTS: In total, 32 policy recommendations were developed. In Delphi Round 1, 19 HCPs participated; consensus was achieved on most recommendations and partial consensus on six. In Delphi Round 2, 18 HCPs participated. After two Delphi rounds, consensus was achieved on all 32 recommendations. All recommendations were considered 'high priority' except one that was considered 'medium priority'. CONCLUSIONS: Through this study it was possible to develop and prioritise evidence-based policy recommendations to enhance medication safety, which may contribute to reducing MEs in ICUs across Europe. All recommendations were considered 'high priority' for implementation except one, indicating the perceived value of these recommendations in improving medication safety through preventing MEs in ICUs.

10.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 81(Supplement_4): S166-S170, 2024 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38581352

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Manipulation of tablet medications to produce a customized dose is common practice, and splitting tablets may reduce the acquisition cost of the medication. However, cost savings may be diminished by the cost of the increased labor and repackaging materials needed when splitting tablets. Splitting tablets may also result in safety concerns if the final products are under (eg, reduced benefit) or over (eg, toxicity) the desired dosage. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate and recommend changes for all half- and quarter-tablet medications prepared and distributed from the inpatient pharmacy at University of Utah Health (U of U Health). SUMMARY: The evaluation included all half- and quarter-tablet medications prepared by pharmacy technicians for administration to patients admitted to U of U Health hospitals. A final list of 173 half- and quarter-tablet dosages was evaluated for opportunities to decrease the total number. On the basis of the developed criteria, 93 half- and quarter-tablet dosages (54%) were recommended to be removed from routine stock in the inpatient pharmacy. Systems remain in place to create customized half and quarter tablets if required for patient care. CONCLUSION: Reducing the number of medications for which half and quarter tablets are used may allow pharmacy technicians to prioritize other patient care tasks and potentially decrease waste.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Pharmacy Technicians , Tablets , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Humans , Drug Compounding/methods , Drug Compounding/standards , Quality Improvement , Cost Savings , Utah
12.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2024 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503475

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This review of the literature aimed to evaluate the economic impact of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector. METHODS: The review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A bibliographic search was conducted on 23 June 2023 using PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. All articles in French or English with economic data on clinical pharmacy activities in orthopaedics were included. Articles not mentioning the term 'orthopaedics' and those published prior to 1990 were excluded. Data from the studies were compiled in an Excel table. A bias analysis using the ROBINS-I Cochrane tool was performed. The methodology of the studies was compared and weighted using the CHEERS and STROBE checklists. RESULTS: Among 529 articles initially identified, 10 were included in the review. The cost-benefit ratio of a clinical pharmacist in orthopaedics ranged from 0.47:1 to 28:1. The maximum savings reached US$73 410 /year in the American study and €1 42 356 /year in the French study. For three studies, the cost of a clinical pharmacist was not evaluated. Eight studies showed a positive economic impact. The Dutch study showed a balance and the Danish study showed a negative economic impact of €3442/month. CONCLUSIONS: This literature review has shown an economic benefit of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector despite several biases and methodological limitations. The two studies that did not confirm this benefit only evaluated a limited number of expected benefits. Nevertheless, the economic impact of the clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector seems positive and undervalued.

13.
J Pharm Pract ; : 8971900241228330, 2024 Jan 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241786

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The Joint Commission standards for titrated infusions require specification of maximum rates of infusion. This practice has led to the development of protocolized maximum doses that can be overridden by provider order ("soft maximums") and to dose caps that cannot be superseded ("hard maximums"). The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of and attitudes towards dose capping of norepinephrine. Methods: A 20-item cross-sectional survey assessing norepinephrine dose capping practices, perceptions of norepinephrine protocols, and respondent and practice site demographics was distributed electronically to the mailing list of an international medical podcast. Responses were stratified according to use of weight-based dosing (WBD) or non-WBD of norepinephrine. The primary objective was to characterize norepinephrine dosing practices including protocolized maximum doses and/or dose capping. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using the Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively, with P < .05 indicating statistical significance. Results: The survey was completed by 586 physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and advanced practice providers. WBD was used by 51% and non-WBD by 47%. A standardized titration protocol was reported by 65% and dose capping was reported by 19%. The protocolized maximum dose ranged from 20-400 mcg/min for respondents using non-WBD (median [interquartile range] 30 [30-50]) and ranged from .2-10 mcg/kg/min for respondents using WBD (1 [.5-3]). The dose cap was 50 (40-123) mcg/min with non-WBD and 2 (1-3) mcg/kg/min with WBD. Conclusions: An international, multi-professional survey of critical care and emergency medicine clinicians revealed wide variability in norepinephrine dosing practices including maximum doses allowed.

14.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 310: 1390-1391, 2024 Jan 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38269661

ABSTRACT

Medication prescribing in paediatrics is complex and compounded by the need to provide age and weight related doses, and errors continue to be problematic. Electronic medication systems (EMS) can reduce errors through dosing calculators and computerised decision support. However, evidence on costs and benefits of these systems is limited, particularly in paediatric hospitals. This paper presents the development of a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) framework to assess the impact of an EMS implementation in a paediatric tertiary hospital. An innovative component of the framework is the incorporation of the impact of the effects of the EMS for both the health system as well as for patients and their wider family networks, allowing a net social benefit assessment. We describe the impact of non-clinical out-of-pocket costs of admission and use discrete choice experiments to measure both medication related harm and the importance of medication safety to families and members of the community.


Subject(s)
Electronics , Medication Systems , Humans , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospitalization , Hospitals, Pediatric
15.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 1425, 2023 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104071

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medication lists prepared in the emergency department (ED) form the basis for diagnosing and treating patients during hospitalization. Since incomplete medication information may lead to patient harm, it is crucial to obtain a correct and complete medication list at hospital admission. In this cross-sectional retrospective study we wanted to explore medication information completeness in admission notes from Norwegian EDs and investigate which factors were associated with level of completeness. METHODS: Medication information was assessed for completeness by applying five evaluation criteria; generic name, formulation, dose, frequency, and indication for use. A medication completeness score in percent was calculated per medication, per admission note and per criterion. Quantile regression analysis was applied to investigate which variables were associated with medication information completeness. RESULTS: Admission notes for patients admitted between October 2018 and September 2019 and using at least one medication were included. A total of 1,080 admission notes, containing 8,604 medication orders, were assessed. The individual medications had a mean medication completeness score of 88.1% (SD 16.4), while admission notes had a mean medication completeness score of 86.3% (SD 16.2). Over 90% of all individual medications had information about generic name, formulation, dose and frequency stated, while indication for use was only present in 60%. The use of an electronic tool to prepare medication information had a significantly strong positive association with completeness. Hospital visit within the last 30 days, the patient's living situation, number of medications in use, and which hospital the patient was admitted to, were also associated with information completeness. CONCLUSIONS: Medication information completeness in admission notes was high, but potential for improvement regarding documentation of indication for use was identified. Applying an electronic tool when preparing admission notes in EDs seems crucial to safeguard completeness of medication information.


Subject(s)
Documentation , Hospitalization , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Patient Admission
16.
Farm. hosp ; 47(6): 268-276, Noviembre - Diciembre 2023. tab, graf
Article in English, Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-227539

ABSTRACT

Objetivo conocer el grado de implantación de las prácticas de prevención de errores de medicación en los hospitales españoles. Método estudio descriptivo multicéntrico del grado de implantación de las prácticas seguras recogidas en el «Cuestionario de autoevaluación de la seguridad del uso de los medicamentos en los hospitales. Versión II». Participaron aquellos hospitales españoles que cumplimentaron este cuestionario entre octubre de 2021 y septiembre de 2022. El cuestionario contiene 265 ítems de evaluación agrupados en 10 elementos clave. Se calculó la puntuación media y el porcentaje medio sobre el valor máximo posible para el cuestionario completo, los elementos clave y los ítems de evaluación. Los resultados se compararon con los del estudio realizado en 2011. Resultados participaron 131 hospitales de 15 comunidades autónomas. La puntuación media del cuestionario completo en los hospitales fue de 898,2 (57,4% del valor máximo posible). No se encontraron diferencias según la dependencia, el tamaño o la finalidad asistencial, ni en el cuestionario completo ni en los elementos clave. Presentaron los valores más bajos los elementos clave VIII, I y VI, sobre competencia y formación de los profesionales en prácticas seguras (45,1%), disponibilidad y accesibilidad de la información esencial sobre los pacientes (48%) y dispositivos para la administración de medicamentos (52,3%). Con respecto a 2011, se encontraron aumentos significativos tanto en el cuestionario completo como en los elementos clave, excepto en el V y VII, referentes a la estandarización, almacenamiento y distribución de medicamentos, y a los factores del entorno y recursos humanos. ...(AU)


Objective To assess the degree of implementation of medication error prevention practices in Spanish hospitals. Method Descriptive multicenter study of the degree of implementation of the safety practices included in the "Medication use-system safety self-assessment for hospitals. Version. II". Spanish hospitals that completed the questionnaire between October/2021 and September/2022 participated. The survey contains 265 items for evaluation grouped into 10 key elements. Mean score and mean percentages based on the maximum possible values for the overall survey, for the key elements and for each individual item of evaluation were calculated. The results were compared with those of the previous 2011 study. Results A total of 131 hospitals from 15 autonomous regions participated in the study. The mean score of the overall questionnaire in all hospitals was 898.2 (57.4% of the maximum possible score). No differences were found according to dependency, size or type of hospital, either in the overall questionnaire or in the key elements. The lowest values were found for key elements 8, 1 and 6, on competence and training of health professionals in safety practices (45.1%), availability and accessibility of essential information on patients (48%), and devices for administering drugs (52.3%). With respect to 2011, significant increases were found both in the overall questionnaire and in the key elements, except 5 and 7, referring to standardization, storage and distribution of medications, and environmental factors and human resources. Several evaluation items on the safe management of high-risk drugs, medication reconciliation, incorporation of clinical pharmacists into the healthcare teams and implementation of technologies that allow full traceability throughout the medication system, showed low percentages. Conclusions.... (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Safety Management/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Multicenter Studies as Topic
17.
Farm. hosp ; 47(5): 196-200, Septiembre - Octubre 2023. tab
Article in English, Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-225607

ABSTRACT

Background Sustainable management of healthcare waste has a positive impact on the global environment. In order to reduce it, the sustainable practice of the pharmacotherapeutic process in all its stages is essential. Objective To analyze the sustainability strategies proposed by the pharmacy service to reduce drug waste derived from the pharmacotherapeutic process. Secondary objectives: to analyze the stage of the pharmacotherapeutic process and the number and type of drugs involved. Methods The study was carried out in a tertiary level hospital. To coordinate the proposals, a referent pharmacist from every pharmacy department area was selected. Four stages of the process were evaluated (procurement, validation, dispensing and compounding), patients concerned were classified as outpatients or inpatients, and drugs potentially involved were analyzed by the administration route: into oral or parenteral. Results 28 ideas were proposed, which could affect more than 1200 drugs. 39.3% would affect the validation process, 17.9% the procurement management, 17.9% dispensing and 7.1% the compounding. Implementation feasibility and acceptability of these proposals were evaluated. Those with the greatest potential were: limiting the duration of treatments when possible, favoring the implementation of computer prescription order entry, favoring the use of the oral route over the parenteral route, and implementing computers in the preparation areas to avoid the use of paper guides. Discussion In our study, many ideas have been proposed by hospital pharmacists to improve the sustainability of the medication use process. When assessing these proposals by impact and feasibility, according to our results, shorten as much as possible the duration of treatments, computerization of the medication use process and oral administration over intravenous should be prioritized in order to reduce environmental impact. (AU)


Antecedentes La gestión sostenible de los residuos sanitarios tiene un impacto positivo en el medio ambiente mundial. Para reducirlo, es esencial la práctica sostenible del proceso farmacoterapéutico en todas sus etapas. Objetivo Analizar las estrategias de sostenibilidad propuestas por el servicio de farmacia para reducir los residuos de medicamentos derivados del proceso farmacoterapéutico. Objetivos secundarios: Analizar la etapa del proceso farmacoterapéutico y el número y tipo de medicamentos implicados. Métodos El estudio se realizó en un hospital de tercer nivel. Para coordinar las propuestas se seleccionó un farmacéutico referente de cada área del servicio de farmacia. Se evaluaron cuatro etapas del proceso (Adquisición, validación, dispensación y formulación), se clasificaron los pacientes afectados como ambulatorios u hospitalizados y se analizaron los fármacos potencialmente implicados según la vía de administración: oral o parenteral. Resultados Se propusieron 28 ideas, que podrían afectar a más de 1.200 medicamentos. El 39,3% afectarían al proceso de validación, el 17,9% a la gestión, el 17,9% a la dispensación y el 7,1% a la formulación. Se evaluó la viabilidad de la aplicación y la aceptabilidad de estas propuestas. Las de mayor potencial fueron: limitar la duración de los tratamientos cuando sea posible, favorecer la implantación de la entrada de órdenes de prescripción por ordenador, favorecer el uso de la vía oral frente a la parenteral e implantar ordenadores en las áreas de preparación para evitar el uso de guías en papel. Conclusiones En nuestro estudio, son muchas las ideas propuestas por los farmacéuticos de hospital para mejorar la sostenibilidad del proceso de utilización de medicamentos... (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Drug Utilization , Sustainable Development Indicators , Environment , Pharmacy , Hospitals , Health Strategies
18.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 46(12): 680-689, dic. 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-213381

ABSTRACT

Objetivo Conocer el grado de implantación de las prácticas seguras con los medicamentos en los Servicios de Medicina Intensiva e identificar oportunidades de mejora. Diseño Estudio descriptivo multicéntrico. Ámbito Servicios de Medicina Intensiva. Participantes/procedimiento Cuarenta Servicios de Medicina Intensiva que voluntariamente cumplimentaron el «Cuestionario de autoevaluación de la seguridad del uso de los medicamentos en los Servicios de Medicina Intensiva» entre marzo y septiembre del 2020. El cuestionario contiene 147 ítems de evaluación agrupados en 10 elementos clave. Variables principales de interés Puntuación media y porcentaje medio sobre el valor máximo posible en el cuestionario completo, en los elementos clave y en los ítems de evaluación. Resultados La puntuación media del cuestionario completo en los Servicios de Medicina Intensiva fue de 436,8 (49,2% del valor máximo posible). No se encontraron diferencias según dependencia funcional, tamaño del hospital y tipo de servicio. Los elementos clave referentes a la incorporación de farmacéuticos en estos servicios, así como a la competencia y la formación de los profesionales en prácticas de seguridad, mostraron los valores más bajos (31,2% y 33,2%, respectivamente). Otros tres elementos clave relativos a la accesibilidad a la información sobre los pacientes y los medicamentos; a la estandarización, el almacenamiento y la distribución de los medicamentos, y a los programas de calidad y gestión de riesgos mostraron porcentajes inferiores al 50%. Conclusiones Se han identificado numerosas prácticas seguras efectivas cuyo grado de implantación en los Servicios de Medicina Intensiva es bajo y que es preciso abordar para reducir los errores de medicación en el paciente crítico (AU)


Objective To assess the level of implementation of medication safety practices in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and to identify opportunities for improvement. Design A descriptive multicenter study was carried out. Setting Intensive Care Units. Participants/procedure A total of 40 ICUs voluntarily completed the “Medication use-system safety self-assessment for Intensive Care Units” between March and September 2020. The survey comprised 147 items for evaluation grouped into 10 key elements. Main variables Calculation was made of the mean scores and mean percentages based on the maximum possible values for the overall survey, for the key elements and for each individual item for evaluation. Results The mean score of the overall questionnaire among the participating ICUs was 436.8 (49.2% of the maximum possible score). No differences were found according to functional dependence, size of the hospital or type of ICU. The key elements referred to the incorporation of clinical pharmacists in these units, as well as the competence and training of the professionals in safety practices yielded the lowest values (31.2% and 33.2%, respectively). Three other key elements related to accessibility to information about patients and medicines; to the standardization, storage and distribution of medicines; and to the quality and risk management programs, yielded percentages below 50%. Conclusions Numerous effective safety medication practices have been identified with a low level of implementation in ICUs. This situation must be addressed in order to reduce medication errors in critically ill patients (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Intensive Care Units , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Patient Safety , Critical Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Critical Illness
19.
Rev. enferm. Cent.-Oeste Min ; 12: 4624, nov. 2022.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1434604

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: caracterizar os incidentes notificados envolvendo o uso de medicamentos em unidades de internação adulto de um hospital universitário. Método: estudo observacional do tipo transversal,em um hospital universitário de grande porte no sul do país. Utilizaram-se 1896 notificações do sistema eletrônico da instituição referente aos erros de medicação, entre 2015 e 2017, em 13 unidades de internação adulto clínica e cirúrgica. Para análise das variáveis utilizou-se um instrumento próprio e estatística descritiva. Resultados: os incidentes de medicação estiveram relacionados à prescrição (85,9%) e administração (10,1%) e envolviam o atraso da prescrição (77%) e a dose errada (7,9%), respectivamente. Os erros concentraram-se no ano de 2015 (70,2%), em unidades de internação cirúrgica (90%) e verificou-se informações preenchidas parcialmente e/ou incompletas nas notificações (70%).Conclusão: a caracterização dos incidentes subsidiou a implementação de estratégias pelos gestores da instituição, voltadas para a problemática, reduzindo as ocorrências e melhorando o cuidado ao paciente.


Objective: to characterize the reported incidents involving the use of medication in adult inpatient units of a university hospital. Method: this is an observational, cross-sectional, in a large university hospital in the south of the country. We used 1896 notifications from the institution's electronic system regarding medication errors, between 2015 and 2017, in 13 adult clinical and surgical hospitalization units. To analyze the variables, a specific instrument and descriptive statistics were used. Results: medication incidents were related to prescription (85.9%) and administration (10.1%) and involved prescription delay (77%) and wrong dose (7.9%), respectively. Errors were concentrated in 2015 (70.2%), in surgical inpatient units (90%) and information was partially filled and/or incomplete in the notifications (70%).Conclusion: the characterization of the incidents supported the implementation of strategies by the institution's managers, focused on the problem, reducing notifications and improving patient care.


Objetivo: caracterizar los incidentes reportados relacionados con el uso de medicación en unidades de internación de adultos de un hospital universitario. Método: se trata de un estudio observacional, transversal, en un gran hospital universitario del sur del país. Se utilizaron 1896 notificaciones del sistema electrónico de la institución sobre errores de medicación, entre 2015 y 2017, en 13 unidades de hospitalización clínica y quirúrgica de adultos. Para el análisis de las variables se utilizó un instrumento específico y estadística descriptiva. Resultados: los incidentes de medicación se relacionaron con la prescripción (85,9%) y la administración (10,1%) e involucraron retraso en la prescripción (77%) y dosis incorrecta (7,9%), respectivamente. Los errores se concentraron en 2015 (70,2%), en las unidades de internación quirúrgica (90%) y la información estaba parcialmente llena y/o incompleta en las notificaciones (70%). Conclusión: la caracterización de los incidentes apoyó la implementación de estrategias por parte de los gerentes de la institución, enfocadas al problema, reduciendo las notificaciones y mejorando la atención al paciente.


Subject(s)
Risk Management , Inpatient Care Units , Patient Safety , Medication Errors , Medication Systems
20.
Rev. enferm. Cent.-Oeste Min ; 12: 4624, nov. 2022.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1425862

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: caracterizar os incidentes notificados envolvendo o uso de medicamentos em unidades de internação adulto de um hospital universitário. Método: estudo observacional do tipo transversal,em um hospital universitário de grande porte no sul do país. Utilizaram-se 1896 notificações do sistema eletrônico da instituição referente aos erros de medicação, entre 2015 e 2017, em 13 unidades de internação adulto clínica e cirúrgica. Para análise das variáveis utilizou-se um instrumento próprio e estatística descritiva. Resultados: os incidentes de medicação estiveram relacionados à prescrição (85,9%) e administração (10,1%) e envolviam o atraso da prescrição (77%) e a dose errada (7,9%), respectivamente. Os erros concentraram-se no ano de 2015 (70,2%), emunidades de internação cirúrgica (90%) e verificou-se informações preenchidas parcialmente e/ou incompletas nas notificações (70%).Conclusão: acaracterização dos incidentes subsidiou a implementação de estratégias pelos gestores da instituição, voltadas para a problemática, reduzindo as ocorrências e melhorando o cuidado ao paciente


Objective:to characterize the reported incidents involving the use of medication in adult inpatient units of a university hospital. Method:this is an observational, cross-sectional, in a large university hospital in the south of the country. We used 1896 notifications from the institution's electronic system regarding medication errors, between 2015 and 2017, in 13 adult clinical and surgical hospitalization units. To analyze the variables, a specific instrument and descriptive statistics were used.Results:medication incidents were related to prescription (85.9%) and administration (10.1%) and involved prescription delay (77%) and wrong dose (7.9%), respectively. Errors were concentrated in 2015 (70.2%), in surgical inpatient units (90%) and information was partially filled and/or incomplete in the notifications (70%).Conclusion:the characterization of the incidents supported the implementation of strategies by the institution's managers, focused on the problem, reducing notifications and improving patient care


Objetivo: caracterizar los incidentes reportados relacionados con el uso de medicación en unidades de internación de adultos de un hospital universitario. Método: se trata de un estudio observacional, transversal, en un gran hospital universitario del sur del país. Se utilizaron 1896 notificaciones del sistema electrónico de la institución sobre errores de medicación, entre 2015 y 2017, en 13 unidades de hospitalización clínica y quirúrgica de adultos. Para el análisis de las variables se utilizó un instrumento específico y estadística descriptiva. Resultados:los incidentes de medicación se relacionaron con la prescripción (85,9%) y la administración (10,1%) e involucraron retraso en la prescripción (77%) y dosis incorrecta (7,9%), respectivamente. Los errores se concentraron en 2015 (70,2%),en las unidades de internación quirúrgica (90%) y la información estaba parcialmente llena y/o incompleta en las notificaciones (70%). Conclusión: la caracterización de los incidentes apoyó la implementación de estrategias por parte de los gerentes de la institución, enfocadas al problema, reduciendo las notificaciones y mejorando la atención al paciente


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Risk Management , Inpatient Care Units , Patient Safety , Medication Errors , Medication Systems
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL