ABSTRACT
Background. Several improvements in performance measure (PM) have been described, in Cuba, in patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). However, it still no clear if reported enhancement has an influence in management of STEMI complicated with Acute Heart Failure. The objective of this study is to determine if those changes in renewed protocol have improved PM of attention of this specific subgroup. Methods and material. Gathering data of patients after June 2014 is mandatory in a web-based tool, which allows, real time following of selected PM. After a first stage, updating in protocol was written, focusing in several gaps. The first stage closed with 81 patients admitted with heart failure after STEMI, meanwhile until late December 2019, other 126 patients were included. Data regarding PM was obtained from all registries, except for those PM related with coronary intervention. Results. Improvement in management was observed for 6 of presented PM for overall population; and in patients with cardiogenic shock, up to 6 PM were fully accomplished in both stages. Pharmacological treatments were administered fulfilling high standards, but no enhancement of in-hospital mortality was observed (19.4% vs. 18.5%; p: 0.86). Although not significant, thrombolytic decreased its prevalence in overall population (57.4 vs 48.1; p: 0.15), and in cardiogenic shock (29.4% vs 25%; p: 0.76). Conclusion. Performance measures were enhanced after an update in protocols of attention. However, most important ones didnt suffer any changes. Efforts to maintain this increase in PM need to be taken.
Introdução. Diversas melhorias na medida de desempenho (MD) foram descritas, em Cuba, em pacientes com infarto do miocárdio com elevação do segmento ST (STEMI). No entanto, ainda não está claro se o realce relatado tem uma influência no tratamento do STEMI complicado com insuficiência cardíaca aguda. O objetivo deste estudo é determinarse essas mudanças no protocolo renovado melhoraram a atenção do MD deste subgrupo específico. Material e métodos. A coleta de dados dos pacientes após junho de 2014 é obrigatória em uma ferramenta baseada na web, que permite o acompanhamento em tempo real dos MD selecionados. Após uma primeira etapa, foi feita a atualização do protocolo, com foco em várias lacunas. A primeira fase encerrou com 81 pacientes internados com insuficiência cardíaca após IAMCSST, enquanto até o final de dezembro de 2019, outros 126 pacientes foram incluídos. Os dados sobre MD foram obtidos de todos os registros, exceto para MD relacionados com intervenção coronária. Resultados. Melhoria na gestão foi observada para 6 das MD apresentadas. Os tratamentos farmacológicos foram administrados de acordo com altos padrões, mas não foi observado aumento da mortalidade intra-hospitalar (21% vs. 24,6%; p: 0,54). Embora não seja significativo, o trombolítico aumenta sua prevalência fora do hospital (12/46 vs. 26/72; p: 0,256). Conclusão. As medidas de desempenho foram aprimoradas após uma atualização nos protocolos de atenção. No entanto, os mais importantes não sofreram alterações. Esforços para manter esse aumento na MD precisam ser feitos.
Antecedentes. Se han descrito varias mejoras en la medición del desempeño (MD), en Cuba, en pacientes con infarto de miocardio con elevación del ST (IAMCEST). Sin embargo, todavía no está claro si la mejora informada tiene influencia en el tratamiento del IAMCEST complicado con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar si esos cambios en el protocolo renovado han mejorado la MD de atención de este subgrupo específico. Material y métodos. La recopilación de datos de pacientes después de junio de 2014 es obligatoria en una herramienta basada en web, que permite el seguimiento en tiempo real de los MD seleccionados. Luego de una primera etapa, se redactó la actualización en protocolo, enfocándose en varios aspectos de deficiente cumplimiento. La primera etapa cerró con 81 pacientes ingresados por insuficiencia cardíaca tras IAMCEST, mientras que hasta finales de diciembre de 2019 se incluyeron otros 126 pacientes. Los datos sobre MD se obtuvieron de todos los registros, excepto los relacionados con la intervención coronaria. Resultados. Se observó una mejora en el manejo para 6 MD presentados. Los tratamientos farmacológicos se administraron cumpliendo altos estándares, pero no se observó un aumento de la mortalidad hospitalaria (21% vs 24,6%; p=0,54). Aunque no es significativo, los trombolíticos aumentan la prevalencia extrahospitalaria (12/46 vs 26/72; p=0,256). Conclusión. Se mejoraron las medidas de desempeño luego de una actualización en los protocolos de atención. Sin embargo, los más importantes no sufrieron cambios. Es necesario realizar esfuerzos para mantener este aumento de MD.
ABSTRACT
Over the last several decades, performance measurement has become an increasingly prevalent requirement among human services agencies for demonstrating program progress and achieving outcomes. In the Tribal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (Tribal MIECHV), performance measurement was one of the central components of the Administration for Children and Families' cooperative agreements to tribes, urban Indian organizations, and tribal organizations. Since the inception of the Tribal MIECHV Program in 2010, the benchmark requirement was intended to be a mechanism to systematically monitor program progress and performance toward improving the quality of home-visiting programs that serve vulnerable American Indian or Alaska Native families. In this article, we examine performance measurement in the context of Tribal MIECHV, providing an overview of performance measurement, the Tribal MIECHV requirement, and how grantees experienced the requirement; we describe the existing literature on performance measurement challenges and benefits, and the specific challenges and advantages experienced by tribal grantees; and provide recommendations for performance measurement in tribal home-visiting contexts based on grantees' own experiences. This article contributes to the literature by examining performance measurement challenges and opportunities in the context of tribal communities, and provides recommendations that may inform future policy on performance measurement design and implementation in tribal communities.
Subject(s)
Child Health Services , Culturally Competent Care/methods , Health Services, Indigenous , House Calls , Maternal Health Services , Program Evaluation/methods , Adult , Alaska , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Indians, North American , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Needs Assessment , New Mexico , Pregnancy , Washington , Young AdultABSTRACT
In this article, Tribal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) grantees share strategies they have developed and adopted to address the most common barriers to effective measurement (and thus to effective evaluation) encountered in the course of implementation and evaluation of their home-visiting programs. We identify key challenges in measuring outcomes in Tribal MIECHV Programs and provide practical examples of various strategies used to address these challenges within diverse American Indian and Alaska Native cultural and contextual settings. Notably, high-quality community engagement is a consistent thread throughout these strategies and fundamental to successful measurement in these communities. These strategies and practices reflect the experiences and innovative solutions of practitioners working on the ground to deliver and evaluate intervention programs to tribal communities. They may serve as models for getting high-quality data to inform intervention while working within the constraints and requirements of program funding. The utility of these practical solutions extends beyond the Tribal MIECHV grantees and offers the potential to inform a broad array of intervention evaluation efforts in tribal and other community contexts.
Subject(s)
Child Health Services , Culturally Competent Care/methods , Health Services, Indigenous , House Calls , Maternal Health Services , Adult , Alaska , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Indians, North American , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Needs Assessment , New Mexico , Pregnancy , Washington , Young AdultABSTRACT
Introducción: el síndrome coronario agudo es una patología de alto impacto clínico en nuestro medio y en el mundo. A pesar de la evidencia de un número de medidas que benefician el resultado de estos pacientes, se ha demostrado que su utilización no es la mejor. Una de las estrategias diseñadas para mejorar esta situación, es la utilización de las rutas críticas (critical pathways), que consisten en una secuencia óptima y guiada por tiempo de intervenciones realizadas por los miembros del equipo de salud, para un diagnóstico o procedimiento particular, con el objetivo de minimizar retrasos, mejorar la utilización de recursos y maximizar la calidad del cuidado de la salud. Métodos: como parte de un proceso de mejoramiento de la calidad de la atención, se decidió realizar la estructuración e implementación de una ruta crítica en el manejo del síndrome coronario agudo durante las primeras 24 horas de atención. Para su realización se tuvo en cuenta la información observada en la literatura luego de una revisión amplia del tema. Resultados: posterior al proceso de diseño, divulgación y concertación con los servicios implicados en el manejo de los eventos coronarios, y con base en las guías institucionales, se estructuró una ruta crítica que consta de tres documentos: el primero para la evaluación inicial del dolor torácico, el segundo para el manejo de los eventos coronarios con elevación del segmento ST y el tercero para eventos coronarios sin elevación del segmento ST. Conclusiones: las rutas críticas se han posicionado en el mundo como herramientas que impactan en un alto grado la calidad de la atención de los pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo, ya que minimizan los retrasos, optimizan la utilización de los recursos y controlan las variaciones de dicha atención. Se describe la estructuración e implementación de una ruta crítica para el manejo de estos pacientes en un hospital de cuarto nivel en Colombia.
Introduction: acute coronary syndrome is a disease with high clinical impact on our environment and the world. Despite the evidence of a number of measures that benefit the outcome of these patients, it has been shown that its use is not the best. One of the strategies designed to improve this situation is the use of critical pathways, which consist of an optimal sequence guided by time of interventions performed by members of the health team for a particular procedure or diagnosis, in order to minimize delays, improve the utilization of resources and maximize the quality of health care. Methods: as part of a process of improvement of the quality of care, we decided to perform the structuring and implementation of a critical pathway in the management of acute coronary syndrome during the first 24 hours of care. To achieve this, we took into account the data observed in the literature after an extensive revision of the topic. Results: posterior to the design process, disclosure and agreement with the departments involved in the management of coronary events, and based on institutional guidelines, we structured a critical pathway consisting of three documents: the first for the initial chest pain assessment, the second for the management of coronary events with ST segment elevation and the third for coronary events without ST segment elevation. Conclusions: critical pathways have been positioned in the world as tools that highly impact the quality of care of patients with acute coronary syndrome, as they minimize delays, optimize the use of resources and control variations of such attention. We describe the structuring and implementation of a critical pathway for the management of these patients in a fourth-level hospital in Colombia.
