Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 74.128
Filter
1.
An. psicol ; 40(2): 344-354, May-Sep, 2024. ilus, tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-232727

ABSTRACT

En los informes meta-analíticos se suelen reportar varios tipos de intervalos, hecho que ha generado cierta confusión a la hora de interpretarlos. Los intervalos de confianza reflejan la incertidumbre relacionada con un número, el tamaño del efecto medio paramétrico. Los intervalos de predicción reflejan el tamaño paramétrico probable en cualquier estudio de la misma clase que los incluidos en un meta-análisis. Su interpretación y aplicaciones son diferentes. En este artículo explicamos su diferente naturaleza y cómo se pueden utilizar para responder preguntas específicas. Se incluyen ejemplos numéricos, así como su cálculo con el paquete metafor en R.(AU)


Several types of intervals are usually employed in meta-analysis, a fact that has generated some confusion when interpreting them. Confidence intervals reflect the uncertainty related to a single number, the parametric mean effect size. Prediction intervals reflect the probable parametric effect size in any study of the same class as those included in a meta-analysis. Its interpretation and applications are different. In this article we explain in de-tail their different nature and how they can be used to answer specific ques-tions. Numerical examples are included, as well as their computation with the metafor Rpackage.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Confidence Intervals , Forecasting , Data Interpretation, Statistical
2.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 85, 2024 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028327

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients presenting with large bowel obstruction (LBO) frequently undergo emergency surgery that is associated with significant morbidity. In malignant LBO, endoscopic approaches with placement is a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), have been proposed to prevent emergency surgery and act as a bridge to an elective procedure-with the intention of avoiding a stoma and reducing morbidity. This systematic review aims to assess the quality and outcomes of data available on the use of SEMS in benign causes of colonic obstruction. METHODS: This systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the protocol was registered on Prospero (ID: CRD42021239363). PUBMED, MEDLINE, HMIC, CINAHL, AMED, EMBASE, APA and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies were assessed for quality utilising the MINORS criteria. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using random effects models. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included for analysis. 300 patients were included with an average age of 68, and a male predominance of 57%. The quality of the papers included were at risk of bias. The pooled rate of technical success of procedure was 94.4% (95% CI 90.5-96.8%) The pooled rate of clinical success was 77.6% (95% CI: 66.6-85.7%). Adverse effects were low, with perforation 8.8% (4.5-16.6%), recurrence 26.5% (17.2-38.5%) and stent migration 22.5% (14.1-33.8%). DISCUSSION: This systematic review demonstrated that SEMS for benign colonic obstruction can be a safe and successful procedure. The utilisation of SEMS in malignant disease as a bridge to surgery has been well documented. Whilst the limitations of the data interpreted are appreciated, we postulate that SEMS could be utilised to decompress patients acutely and allow pre-operative optimisation, leading to a more elective surgery with less subsequent morbidity.


Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases , Intestinal Obstruction , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Colonic Diseases/surgery , Colonic Diseases/etiology , Female , Male , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Middle Aged
3.
J Infect Chemother ; 2024 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39029624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone and joint infections are challenging infectious diseases to treat and require prolonged antimicrobial treatment. Dalbavancin demonstrated promising pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties for the treatment of these infections. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of dalbavancin to standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of bone and joint infections. METHODS: Two independent authors performed a comprehensive search through the major databases up to September 2023. Interventional and observational studies that compared the clinical success of dalbavancin to SOC for the treatment of osteoarticular infections (OAI) were included. RESULTS: A total of 6 studies and 581 patients were included, 282 in dalbavancin group and 299 in SOC group. Only one study was randomized clinical trial. When the data from the 6 studies were pooled in a meta-analysis, clinical success did not differ in those who received dalbavancin versus SOC (OR = 1.55, 95 % CI = 0.95-2.55, I-squared = 15.89 %) for the treatment of OAI infections. Four studies compared the two groups in terms of hospital length of stay and demonstrated a significant shorter length of stay in dalbavancin group compared to SOC group. Treatment-emergent adverse effects were reported in up to 21.4 % of patients in the dalbavancin group and up to 36.7 % of patients in the SOC group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that dalbavancin is as effective as SOC for the treatment of patients with OAI infections. More data are needed to validate these findings.

4.
Nutr Rev ; 2024 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39038797

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Hesperidin is a naturally occurring bioactive compound that may influence cardiometabolic markers, but the existing evidence is inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to further investigate the effects of hesperidin supplementation on cardiometabolic markers in adults. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search was conducted up to August 2023, utilizing relevant key words in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA EXTRACTION: RCTs that examined the impact of hesperidin on fasting blood sugar (FBS), insulin, quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index (QUICKI), homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were selected independently by 2 authors. The GRADE assessment was used to ascertain the certainty of the evidence. Results were pooled using a random-effects model as weighted mean differences and 95% CIs. DATA ANALYSIS: The results of this study demonstrate that hesperidin supplementation had a significant impact on reducing FBS, TG, TC, LDL-C, SBP, and TNF-α. However, there was no significant effect observed on insulin, HOMA-IR, QUICKI, HDL-C, DBP, and hs-CRP. The study's subgroup analyses also revealed that interventions lasting more than 12 weeks were effective in reducing FBS, TG, TC, and LDL-C. Moreover, hesperidin dosage exceeding 500 mg/day showed significance in reducing FBS, TC, and LDL-C levels. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this research suggests that hesperidin can be consumed as an effective dietary approach to enhance cardiometabolic markers. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022325775.

5.
J Endocr Soc ; 8(8): bvae123, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957655

ABSTRACT

Aims: Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome (RMS) is a rare autosomal, recessive disorder characterized by severe insulin resistance due to mutations in the insulin receptor (INSR) gene. This study aims to analyze the clinical features and gene mutations in RMS, which have not been extensively studied. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang were searched for "Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome" or "Black acanthosis hirsutism insulin resistance syndrome." Results: A total of 42 cases from 33 articles were included. The body mass index ranged from 18.50 to 20.00 kg/m2 with an average of 16.00 kg/m2. There were no overweight (25.00∼29.90 kg/m2) or obese (≥30.00 kg/m2) patients. Acanthosis was present in 29 cases (29/42, 69.05%); growth retardation in 25 cases (25/42, 59.52%); dental anomalies including absence of teeth, crowding, and malocclusion in 23 cases (23/42, 54.76%); and hirsutism in 17 cases (17/42, 40.48%). The average glycosylated hemoglobin was 9.35%, and the average fasting blood-glucose was 8.44 mmol/L; the mean fasting insulin was 349.96 µIU/mL, and the average fasting C-peptide was 6.00 ng/mL. Diabetes was reported in 25 cases (25/33, 75.76%) all of which were diagnosed before 23 years old. All 42 patients had recorded gene mutations, with 22 patients (22/42, 52.38%) having ≥ 2 mutations and 20 cases (20/42, 47.62%) having only 1 mutation. No statistical differences were found in clinical features and laboratory parameters between patients with different mutations. Conclusion: The study indicates that RMS should be considered in young patients with hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia with low weight, acanthosis nigricans, growth retardation, dental anomalies, and hirsutism.

6.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(7): 483, 2024 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042154

ABSTRACT

Severe alopecia areata (AA) is a nonscarring hair loss for immune disorder and SALT score ≥ 50%. The guidelines for managing patients with severe AA suggest treatments: systemic steroids, JAK inhibitors, and contact immunotherapy. However, there is a lack of evidence indicating the superiority of one treatment over another. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the most effective treatment for severe AA through network meta-analysis. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a network meta-analysis. The literature search was retrieved across four databases. The Cochrane 5.1 risk of bias assessment tool and ROBINS-I tool assessed quality of the included studies. Subsequently, efficacy and safety comparisons among the three treatments were conducted using Stata 14.0 on account of the frequency method. The SUCRA rank indicated that oral dexamethasone (95.9%) > diphenylcyclopropenone(DPCP) (74.5%) > oral ritlecitinib (62.6%) > oral baricitinib (46.9%) > squaric acid dibutyl ester(SADBE) (20.1%) > placebo (0.0%) from high to low in the aspect of improving efficacy. As for safety, placebo(88.4%) > oral ritlecitinib (86.5%) > oral baricitinib (62.1%) > SADBE (37.0%) > oral dexamethasone(22.3%) > DPCP(3.8%) in the aspect of decreasing adverse events. Oral dexamethasone and DPCP showed superior efficacy compared to oral ritlecitinib and oral baricitinib. However, in terms of safety, oral ritlecitinib was preferable. Some adverse events associated with oral dexamethasone and DPCP were intolerable to patients, whereas those related to oral ritlecitinib and oral baricitinib were more manageable. Overall, ritlecitinib and baricitinib remain promising drugs in the future treatment of severe AA.


Subject(s)
Alopecia Areata , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Network Meta-Analysis , Humans , Alopecia Areata/drug therapy , Alopecia Areata/immunology , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Administration, Oral , Purines/administration & dosage , Purines/adverse effects , Azetidines/administration & dosage , Azetidines/adverse effects , Azetidines/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Cyclopropanes/administration & dosage , Cyclopropanes/adverse effects , Cyclopropanes/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Pyrazoles
7.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 291, 2024 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042265

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative outcome measures between the AirSeal system and conventional insufflation system in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Up to May 2024, comprehensive searches were conducted across various prominent databases worldwide, such as PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, focusing solely on English-language materials. Reviews and protocols devoid of published data were excluded, along with conference abstracts and articles unrelated to the study's aims. Primary outcome measures encompassed operative duration and hospitalization length, while secondary outcome measures included estimated blood loss and complications. The meta-analysis included five cohort studies, encompassing a total of 1503 patients. In comparison to the conventional insufflation system group, the AirSeal group displayed shorter operative times (WMD - 15.62, 95% CI - 21.87 to - 9.37; p < 0.00001) and reduced hospital stays (WMD - 0.45, 95% CI - 0.60 to - 0.30; p < 0.00001). Fewer major complications (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.66; p = 0.01). Notably, there were no significant differences observed in estimated blood loss or overall complications between the two groups. Compared to conventional insufflation systems, employing the AirSeal system in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy appears to potentially decrease operative time and hospital length of stay without a concurrent rise in estimated blood loss or complication rates.


Subject(s)
Insufflation , Laparoscopy , Operative Time , Prostatectomy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Male , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Insufflation/instrumentation , Laparoscopy/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/instrumentation , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
8.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 10: e52926, 2024 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042433

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To address the global challenge of vaccine hesitancy, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization strongly promotes vaccination reminder and recall interventions. Coupled with the new opportunities presented by scientific advancements, these measures are crucial for successfully immunizing target population groups. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness of various interventions in increasing vaccination coverage compared with standard or usual care. The review will cover all vaccinations recommended for different age groups. METHODS: In February 2022, 2 databases were consulted, retrieving 1850 studies. Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, 79 manuscripts were included after the assessment phase. These comprised 46 trials/randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 33 before-after studies. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed with STATA software (version 14.1.2). The selected outcome was the risk ratio (RR) of vaccination coverage improvement effectiveness. Additionally, meta-regression analyses were conducted for the included manuscripts. RESULTS: The analyses showed an overall efficacy of RR 1.22 (95% CI 1.19-1.26) for RCTs and RR 1.70 (95% CI 1.54-1.87) for before-after studies when considering all interventions cumulatively. Subgroup analyses identified multicomponent interventions (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.36-1.85) and recall clinical interventions (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17-1.32) as the most effective in increasing vaccination coverage for RCTs. By contrast, educational interventions (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.60-2.83) and multicomponent interventions (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.43-1.82) achieved the highest increases for before-after studies. Meta-regression analyses indicated that the middle-aged adult population was associated with a higher increase in vaccination coverage (RCT: coefficient 0.54, 95% CI 0.12-0.95; before-after: coefficient 1.27, 95% CI 0.70-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: Community, family, and health care-based multidimensional interventions, as well as education-based catch-up strategies, effectively improve vaccination coverage. Therefore, their systematic implementation is highly relevant for targeting undervaccinated population groups. This approach aligns with national vaccination schedules and aims to eliminate or eradicate vaccine-preventable diseases.


Subject(s)
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vaccination , Humans , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data
9.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis ; 11(4): 917-927, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044503

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by intricate genetic and environmental etiology. The objective of this study was to identify robust non-genetic risk factors for AD through an updated umbrella review. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of meta-analyses and systematic reviews on non-genetic risk factors associated with AD in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Ovid Medline up to June 30, 2023. After collecting data, we estimated the summary effect size and their 95% confidence intervals. The degree of heterogeneity between studies was assessed using I2 statistics and a 95% prediction interval was determined. Additionally, we evaluated potential excess significant bias and small study effects within the selected candidate studies. RESULTS: The umbrella review encompassed a total of 53 eligible papers, which included 84 meta-analyses covering various factors such as lifestyle, diet, environmental exposures, comorbidity or infections, drugs, and biomarkers. Based on the evidence classification criteria employed in this study, two factors as convincing evidence (Class I), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), potentially reduced the risk of AD, but diabetes significantly increased the risk of AD. Furthermore, three factors as highly suggestive evidence (Class II), namely depression, high homocysteine, and low folic acid level, potentially increased the risk of AD. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight several risk factors associated with AD that warrant consideration as potential targets for intervention. However, it is crucial to prioritize the identified modifiable risk factors, namely rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, depression, elevated homocysteine levels, and low folic acid levels to effectively address this complex neurodegenerative disorder.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Humans , Risk Factors , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/genetics , Biomarkers/blood , Life Style
10.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951259

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies among women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The pooled effect sizes were reported as odds ratios (OR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and data analysis was performed using the random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies involving 4,730,728 women were included in this meta-analysis. The results reveal a significant increase in the prevalence of placenta accreta cases after RPL compared to women without RPL (pooled OR 4.04; 95% CI 1.16-14.15; 2 studies; I2 = 94%; P = 0.03). However, no elevated risk of aneuploidies (pooled OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.73-3.90; 5 studies; I2 = 48%; P = 0.22) or congenital anomalies (pooled OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.97-1.30; 7 studies; I2 = 13%; P = 0.12) in subsequent pregnancies of women with RPL was observed. Additionally, a moderate increase in the risk of various other obstetric and perinatal outcomes was found. The magnitude of the elevated risk of these adverse outcomes varied depending on the region. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a history of RPL exhibit a significantly elevated risk of placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancies, along with a moderate increase in the risk of various other adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes. However, RPL does not signify an increased risk of aneuploidies or congenital anomalies in a consecutive pregnancy.

11.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 274, 2024 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951387

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor worldwide, and mastectomy remains the primary strategy for treating early stage breast cancer. However, the complication rates, surgical variables, and oncologic safety of minimally invasive nipple-sparing mastectomy (MINSM) have not been fully addressed. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that compared MINSM with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy (CNSM), both followed by Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction (PBR). The main outcomes observed included overall complications, (Grade III) complications, skin and nipple necrosis, wound dehiscence, infection, seroma, hematoma, implant loss, and oncologic safety (positive margins and recurrence). Secondary outcomes included operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction. Binary and continuous variables were compared using odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 10 studies involving 2,166 patients were included. There were no statistically significant differences between MINSM and CNSM in terms of skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, infection, seroma, hematoma, implant loss, or oncologic safety. However, MINSM significantly reduced overall complications (OR = 0. 74, 95% CI [0. 58, 0. 94], p = 0. 01) and (Grade III) complications (OR = 0. 47, 95% CI [0. 31, 0. 71], p = 0. 0003). Nipple necrosis events were also significantly reduced in the MINSM group (OR = 0. 49, 95% CI [0. 30, 0. 80], p = 0. 005). Patient satisfaction improved notably in the MINSM group. Additionally, compared with the CNSM group, the MINSM group had longer operating times (MD = 46. 88, 95% CI [19. 55, 74. 21], p = 0. 0008) and hospital stays (MD = 1. 39, 95% CI [0. 65, 2. 12], p < 0. 001), while intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced (MD = -29. 05, 95% CI [-36. 20, -21. 90], p < 0. 001). Compared with CNSM, MINSM offers advantages in reducing complications and intraoperative blood loss, as well as improving aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction. Therefore, MINSM may become a viable option for breast surgery. Nevertheless, a long-term evaluation of the oncologic safety of this approach is necessary to ensure its efficacy and safety for patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Nipples , Postoperative Complications , Female , Humans , Breast Implants , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Mammaplasty/methods , Mastectomy/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Nipples/surgery , Operative Time , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Treatment Outcome
12.
Orthop Surg ; 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951735

ABSTRACT

To investigate the effects of patellar denervation (PD) and non-patellar denervation (NPD) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing, this study conducted systematic electronic searches in November 2023 using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus, adhering to Cochrane Collaboration recommendations. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Additionally, a manual search was performed to identify potentially eligible studies from the reference lists of review articles. Two researchers independently conducted literature reviews, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments. The outcome analysis encompassed the incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP), visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), American Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), patellar score (PS), complications, and reoperations. Meta-analysis was executed using RevMan 5.3 software. To enhance the credibility of the study, TSA v0.9 software was utilized to perform power analysis on the overall efficacy of primary and secondary outcomes. Twelve studies involving 1745 patients (1587 knees) were included, with 852 undergoing PD and 893 undergoing NPD. Results indicated a superior reduction in AKP incidence in the PD group compared to the NPD group. Statistically significant differences were observed between PD and NPD in KSS, OKS, and PS. However, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for each outcome fell below the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). No significant differences were found in VAS and ROM between PD and NPD. Additionally, PD was not associated with an increased incidence of complications or reoperations. Within 12 months and beyond, PD was proven to be a beneficial intervention in reducing AKP following TKA without patellar resurfacing, achieved without an increase in complications or reoperations. Regarding KSS, OKS, and PS, the minimal advantage achievable through PD may not be clinically significant.

13.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951942

ABSTRACT

AIM: To perform a participant-level post hoc meta-analysis of Phase 3a trials in type 2 diabetes (T2D) to characterize the hypoglycaemia safety and glycaemic efficacy of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All ONWARDS 1-5 randomized participants were pooled as overall T2D, insulin-naive, an insulin-experienced subgroups, and by once-daily trial comparator (degludec or glargine U100). The main outcomes included incidence and rates of clinically significant and severe hypoglycaemia. Additional endpoints included change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline and HbA1c target achievement without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised 3765 participants (1882 icodec vs. 1883 comparators). In the overall T2D pool, clinically significant hypoglycaemia incidence was similar in the icodec group versus the comparator group (17.9% vs. 16.2%, odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94, 1.38); however, rates were low but significantly higher in the icodec group (1.15 vs. 1.00 episodes/participant-year of exposure, estimated rate ratio 1.51 [95% CI 1.24, 1.85]). Fewer severe hypoglycaemic episodes occurred with icodec than with comparators (8 vs. 18). A greater reduction in HbA1c occurred with icodec versus comparators, irrespective of subgroup (estimated treatment difference range [-0.10 to -0.29%]; all p < 0.05). Across subgroups, except for the insulin-experienced subgroup, the odds of achieving HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (7.0%) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia were greater with icodec than with comparators (OR range 1.30-1.55; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Icodec was associated with a similar incidence but higher rates of clinically significant hypoglycaemia (equating to one additional hypoglycaemic episode every 6 years) and fewer severe hypoglycaemic episodes versus comparators. Our findings also confirmed the greater efficacy of icodec that was demonstrated in the ONWARDS trial programme.

14.
Aging Ment Health ; : 1-12, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38952191

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine a pooled prevalence of depression and its influencing factors among nursing home residents. METHOD: PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies investigating the prevalence and risk factors of late-life depression among nursing home residents between January 2012 and November 2022. Two reviewers independently completed the literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment. A random-effects model was utilized to pool the prevalence of depression and summarize the influencing factors. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 48 studies involving 28,501 participants. The pooled prevalence of depressive mood and major depressive disorder was 53% and 27%, respectively. The rate of depressive mood is higher in lower-middle-income countries (60.0%), compared with high- (53.0%) and upper-middle-income countries (44.0%). The rate of depressive mood (35.0%) is higher among females than male (19.0%). Depression was influenced by factors, including male (OR = 0.28), insufficient income (OR = 3.53), comorbidities (OR = 2.66), pain (OR = 2.67; r = 0.31), functional disability (r = 0.33), loneliness (r = 0.43), number of chronic health problems (r = 0.18), social support (r = -0.28), activities of daily living (r = -0.43), subjective health (r = -0.28), autonomy (r = -0.41), environment (r = -0.50) and physical (r = -0.57) and psychological health (r = -0.65). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of depressive mood is high among nursing home residents, especially in lower-middle-income countries. It is influenced by factors including gender, income, social support, daily activities, environment, physical and psychological health and autonomy. Understanding those factors can provide evidence-based recommendations for improved awareness, prevention and better management of late-life depression.

15.
J Neurol ; 2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955829

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Outcomes of clinical trials of treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) may be influenced by placebo effects. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with placebo effects in Parkinson's disease (PD) for guidance with design of future clinical trials. METHODS: Factors associated with placebo effects in PD were examined in a meta-analysis using a random effects model with pooling of placebo effects on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III) or Movement Disorder Society sponsored revision of UPDRS III (MDS-UPDRS III). The following prespecified variables were included in the analyses: with or without drug at baseline, with or without a placebo run-in phase, with or without motor fluctuation, published year, number of study sites, placebo administration period, age, sex, disease duration, and daily levodopa dose. Publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of funnel plots and adjusted using the trim-and-fill method. RESULTS: Thirty-eight articles with a total of 4828 subjects satisfied the inclusion criteria. There was a significant placebo effect using UPDRS III or MDS-UPDRS III (SMD = - 0.25; 95% CI - 0.35 to - 0.14; p < 0.001, I2 = 92%). Subgroup and/or multivariate meta-regression analyses revealed that placebo effects were associated with advanced PD (p = 0.04), drug exposure at baseline (p < 0.001), placebo administration period (p < 0.001), and disease duration (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are important as guidance in design of future clinical trials in which the influence of placebo effects is minimized.

16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955995

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The guidelines recommend conventional cold snare polypectomy (C-CSP) for diminutive and small colorectal polyps (≤ 10 mm). However, it remains unclear whether CSP with sub-mucosal injection (SI-CSP) achieves comparable efficacy to C-CSP for managing these lesions. This study compares SI-CSP with C-CSP for patients with diminutive and small colorectal polyps. METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted to retrieve articles comparing resection outcomes between SI-CSP and C-CSP in diminutive and small colorectal polyps (registration number INPLASY2023100096). Our primary outcomes of interest were the complete resection rate (CRR), complications (namely immediate bleeding, delayed bleeding and perforation) and polypectomy time. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were employed for continuous variables, while odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated for categorical variables. Data was analyzed using a random effects model and the I2 test was utilized to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eight studies involving 1470 patients with 2223 polyps were included in our analysis. The CRR was not significantly higher in the SI-CSP group, with an OR of 95% CI 0.50 (0.22, 1.15). The incidences of immediate bleeding (OR 95% CI 0.60 [0.26-1.40]) and delayed bleeding (OR 95% CI 0.88 [0.32-2.42]) did not differ significantly between the two groups. On average, the mean polypectomy time was 64.75 seconds shorter in the C-CSP group (95% CI, - 102.96 to - 26.53). Notably, no perforation events were reported in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SI-CSP was not superior to C-CSP in managing diminutive and small colorectal polyps and the procedure required significantly more time.

17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956908

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evodiamine (EVO) is an alkaloid extracted from the dried and nearly ripe fruits of Euodia rutaecarpa and used as an anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory and anti-obesity agent. However, robust evidence of preclinical experiments has been lacking so far. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to investigate the effect of EVO in combination with other treatments on tumors in animal experiments. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the anti-tumor effect of evodiamine-combined therapy. The search engine and electronic databases included PubMed, Scopus, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI), and SinoMed. The research method was based on the PRISMA checklist. RESULTS: A total of 7 studies and 108 animals were included. As a result, EVO combined therapy was found to be more effective than EVO monotherapy. The SMD was -25.64(95% CI: -5.77 -3.13) in tumor growth. In tumor weight, the SMD was -8.91(95% CI: -16.37, -1.44). CONCLUSION: EVO has the potential to alleviate the toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents, which increases the translatability to the clinical situation.

18.
Res Synth Methods ; 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965066

ABSTRACT

The application of network meta-analysis is becoming increasingly widespread, and for a successful implementation, it requires that the direct comparison result and the indirect comparison result should be consistent. Because of this, a proper detection of inconsistency is often a key issue in network meta-analysis as whether the results can be reliably used as a clinical guidance. Among the existing methods for detecting inconsistency, two commonly used models are the design-by-treatment interaction model and the side-splitting models. While the original side-splitting model was initially estimated using a Bayesian approach, in this context, we employ the frequentist approach. In this paper, we review these two types of models comprehensively as well as explore their relationship by treating the data structure of network meta-analysis as missing data and parameterizing the potential complete data for each model. Through both analytical and numerical studies, we verify that the side-splitting models are specific instances of the design-by-treatment interaction model, incorporating additional assumptions or under certain data structure. Moreover, the design-by-treatment interaction model exhibits robust performance across different data structures on inconsistency detection compared to the side-splitting models. Finally, as a practical guidance for inconsistency detection, we recommend utilizing the design-by-treatment interaction model when there is a lack of information about the potential location of inconsistency. By contrast, the side-splitting models can serve as a supplementary method especially when the number of studies in each design is small, enabling a comprehensive assessment of inconsistency from both global and local perspectives.

19.
Eur Spine J ; 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty through different pedicle approaches in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) by network meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science. Database for literature retrieval, retrieval time from the establishment of the database to April 2023, the randomized controlled trials of unilateral vertebroplasty (UVP), bilateral vertebroplasty (BVP), unilateral kyphoplasty (UKP), bilateral kyphoplasty (BKP), curved vertebroplasty (CVP) and curved kyphoplasty (CKP) were screened, evaluated and the data were extracted and included in the analysis. STATA 15.0 and ReMan 5.3 were used for data analysis. This study was registered in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) with the registration number CRD42023405181. RESULTS: This study included 16 articles with a total of 1712 patients. The order of visual analogue scale (VAS) improvement from good to bad is CVP > BVP > UVP > CKP > BKP > UKP. The order of kyphotic angles improvement from good to bad is CKP > UKP > UKP > UVP > BVP > CVP. The order of bone cement injection from less to more is UVP > CVP > UKP > CKP > BVP > BKP. The order of bone cement leakage rate from less to more is CKP > CVP > UKP > BKP > UVP > BVP. The order of X-ray exposure time from less to more is CKP > CVP > UVP > BVP > UKP > BKP. The order of operation time from less to more is CVP > UVP > UKP > CKP > BVP > BKP. CONCLUSION: For patients with kyphotic angles, kyphoplasty has unique advantages in improving kyphotic angles. But generally speaking, curved approach can optimize the distribution of bone cement through unilateral approach to achieve the orthopedic effect of bilateral approach, which is a minimally invasive technique with better curative effect and higher safety in the treatment of OVCF.

20.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 2024 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38992964

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) have become an effective treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PC). However, it is unknown which ARI is the most helpful and safe for men with advanced PC. Our aim is to help physicians make clinical decisions and provide medication guidelines for patients with advanced PC to avoid potential risks when using ARIs for treatment. METHODS: We systematically searched the following databases: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, with a literature publication deadline of February 2023. The primary efficacy outcomes were 18-month overall survival (OS), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), hypertension and fatigue. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed by Stata 15.1, and Revman 5.3 was used to assess the included studies' risk of bias. RESULTS: The analysis included 26 trials with 26 263 people. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) concluded that enzalutamide (86.8%) showed the best effect in prolonging the OS of patients. Flutamide led to the highest risk of TEAEs (29.9%) and AEs leading to discontinuation (12.8%). Apalutamide (13.4%) led to the highest risk of grade ≥3 TEAEs. Enzalutamide had the highest risk of hypertension (0.2%), grade ≥3 hypertension (4.5%) and fatigue (5.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This NMA indicates there is no one ARI to reach both the most effective and safe therapy aims for treating advanced PC and that there is a compromise between the efficacy and safety of ARIs in the treatment of advanced PC. Physicians should weigh the risks to safety against the anticipated benefits when prescribing these drugs to patients with PC.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL