Efficacy and safety of PD-1/L1 inhibitors as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/L1 inhibitors as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC). Method: Articles evaluating first-line PD-1/L1 inhibitors for mCRC were sought in four databases (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) from the inception of the databases until 11 November 2023. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess the rates of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (trAEs). Results: Totally nine studies were included for meta-analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed based on mismatch repair(MMR) status and regimens. In patients diagnosed with mismatch repair-deficient(dMMR) mCRC who received PD-1/L1 inhibitors as their first-line treatment, the ORR was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.68), the median PFS was 53.2 months, the Grade≥ 3 TRAEs rate was 0.33(95% CI, 0.12 to 0.60) and the median OS was not determined. For patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) mCRC who underwent a combined treatment of PD-1/L1 inhibitors, anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody and chemotherapy as their first-line therapy, the ORR was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.68), the median PFS was 10.1 months, the median OS was 26.7 months, and the Grade≥ 3 TRAEs rate was 0.59(95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77). Conclusion: Our results revealed that the utilization of PD-1/L1 inhibitors as first-line therapy for dMMR mCRC yielded highly favorable outcomes, while maintaining an acceptable level of safety. Administering a combination of PD-1/L1 inhibitors, anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, and chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with pMMR mCRC led to an improved ORR. However, there was no significant improvement in the long-term prognosis of the tumor. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024506196, identifier CRD42024506196.

A Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab versus Placebo for Previously Treated Patients from Asia with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Health-Related Quality of Life Analysis from KEYNOTE-394.

Introduction: KEYNOTE-394 showed pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate with manageable safety versus placebo for patients from Asia with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We present results on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: HRQoL was evaluated using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaires. Key HRQoL endpoints were least squares mean (LSM) score changes from baseline to week 12 and time to deterioration (TTD) for EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL. p values were one-sided and nominal without adjustment for multiplicity. Results: The HRQoL population included patients randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n = 298) and placebo (n = 152). From baseline to week 12, a greater decline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score was observed with placebo (LSM, -8.4; 95% CI: -11.7 to -5.1) versus pembrolizumab (-4.0; 95% CI: -6.4 to -1.6; difference vs. placebo: 4.4; 95% CI: 0.5-8.4; nominal p = 0.0142). Similarly, a greater decline in the EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale score was observed with placebo (-6.9; 95% CI: -9.4 to -4.5) versus pembrolizumab (-2.7; 95% CI: -4.5 to -1.0; difference vs. placebo: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.2-7.2; nominal p = 0.0030). TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score was similar between arms (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI: 0.58-1.25; nominal p = 0.1993). Conclusion: Patients receiving placebo showed a greater decline in HRQoL than those receiving pembrolizumab. Combined with efficacy and safety data from KEYNOTE-394 and the global KEYNOTE-240 and KEYNOTE-224 trials, our data support the clinically meaningful benefit and manageable tolerability of pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cutaneous Adverse Reactions and Survival Outcomes of Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in an Academic Medical Centre in Singapore.

Programmed cell death-1 (PD1) inhibitors, a form of immune checkpoint inhibitor, are efficacious for metastatic melanoma but are associated with cutaneous adverse reactions (CARs). Studies in Europe and North America showed that CARs are associated with an increased overall survival. However, studies from Asia showed mixed results. There is a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of PD1 inhibitors and the effect of CARs on overall survival from Southeast Asia. A retrospective study of patients in the National Cancer Centre Singapore who were diagnosed with melanoma between 2015 and 2020 was conducted. Patients were included in the study if they had stage IV melanoma (advanced melanoma). Sixty-two patients were included in the study. The median age was 62.5 years and acral melanoma was the commonest subtype. Forty-three patients received PD1 inhibitors. Comparing patients who did not receive PD1 inhibitors to patients who received PD1 inhibitors, the former had a median overall survival of 6 months (95% CI: 5.07, 6.93), whereas the latter had a median overall survival of 21 months (95% CI: 13.33, 28.67; p < 0.001) (Hazard ratio 0.32; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.63; p = 0.001). Amongst patients who received PD1 inhibitors, patients who developed CARs had a greater median overall survival of 33 months (95% CI: 17.27, 48.73) compared to 15 months (95% CI: 9.20, 20.80; p = 0.013) for patients who did not (HR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.098, 0.834; p = 0.022). This study provides insight into the outcomes of metastatic melanoma in Singapore, and adds to the body of evidence supporting the use of PD1 inhibitors in Asians.

Successful treatment of PD1-inhibitor induced psoriasiform dermatitis using IL-17 blockade without compromising immunotherapy efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal PD-1 inhibitor used in the treatment of lung cancer in addition to several other malignancies. Psoriasiform dermatitis is a well-documented adverse effect. CASE REPORT: We present a 68 year-old-male with a 50-year smoking history and a 30-year remote history of plaque psoriasis, limited to the knees and elbows, who presented with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. He was started on a chemotherapy regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab. One month later, he presented to dermatology with diffuse erythematous scaly papules coalescing into plaques on 80% of body surface area (BSA). MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: Pembrolizumab treatment was paused. The patient was prescribed triamcinolone 0.1% twice daily, but still had significant BSA at one-month and was started on an Il-17 inhibitor, ixekizumab, clearing the psoriasiform dermatitis. He was rechallenged with pembrolizumab every 3 weeks and repeat PET/CT demonstrated excellent tumor response. DISCUSSION: This case prompted a literature review to further characterize the use of IL-17 inhibitors for psoriasiform dermatitis in the setting of ICI therapy. All six cases demonstrated improvement of psoriasiform dermatitis, with two cases showing partial response and four cases showing complete resolution. In three of the six cases, the patients exhibited clinical response to the primary malignancy after rechallenging with ICI, while remaining on an IL-17 inhibitor. Our case, in conjunction with the other reported cases, seems to suggest that IL-17 blockade can maintain a fine balance in this challenging clinical scenario by treating psoriasiform dermatitis without compromising the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus camrelizumab and apatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is limited information on combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC). We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of HAIC plus camrelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) and apatinib (an VEGFR-2 inhibitor) versus camrelizumab and apatinib for Ad-HCC. METHODS: From April 2019 to October 2022, 416 patients with Ad-HCC who received either HAIC plus camrelizumab and apatinib (TRIPLET protocol, n = 207) or camrelizumab and apatinib (C-A protocol, n = 209) were reviewed retrospectively. The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selective bias. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Cox regression analyses of independent prognostic factors were evaluated. RESULTS: After PSM 1:1, 109 patients were assigned to two groups. The median OS of not reached in the TRIPLET group was significantly longer than that of 19.9 months in the C-A group (p < 0.001), while in the TRIPLET group, the median PFS of 11.5 months was significantly longer than that of 9.6 months in the C-A group (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that the factors significantly affected the OS were CTP grade, tumor number > 3, and TRIPLET treatment (p < 0.001). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred at a rate of 82.1% vs. 71.3% in TRIPLET and C-A groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The TRIPLET protocol has promising survival benefits in the management of patients with Ad-HCC, with acceptable safety. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The study has been retrospectively registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , ChiCTR2300075828).

Corrigendum: Cardiac infarction caused by PD-1 inhibitor during small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ureter treatment: a case report.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1114397.].

Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP) inhibitor APG-1387 monotherapy or in combination with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor toripalimab in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from two phase I trials.

BACKGROUND: APG-1387 is a novel second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspases mimetic, small-molecule inhibitor targeting inhibitor of apoptosis proteins. We report results from two phase I trials evaluating the tolerability, safety, and antitumor activity of APG-1387 monotherapy and APG-1387 plus toripalimab [a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor] for advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants aged ≥18 years who had histologically confirmed advanced solid tumors with no appropriate standard of care (or refractory to standard care) were eligible. Patients received escalating intravenous doses of APG-1387 alone or combined with fixed-dose toripalimab (240 mg every 3 weeks) in a '3 + 3' design. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in the monotherapy trial, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in the combination therapy trial. Secondary endpoints included the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and preliminary efficacy in both trials. RESULTS: In the monotherapy trial, 28 subjects were enrolled and received ≥1 treatment cycle. No DLT was reported among the 28 subjects, and the MTD was not reached. One participant (3.6%) had a grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) of alanine aminotransferase elevation. In efficacy analysis of 23 participants, none achieved an objective response, and the disease control rate was 21.7%. In the combination trial, 22 subjects were enrolled and included in all analyses. There was one DLT of grade 3 lipase elevation. The MTD was not reached. Four grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in three participants (13.6%), with the most common being lipase elevation (n = 2). The RP2D was 45 mg weekly. The objective response rate was 13.6%, with complete response achieved in one subject, and the disease control rate was 54.5%. CONCLUSIONS: APG-1387 45 mg weekly plus toripalimab was well tolerated and is recommended for further study, with preliminary clinical activity observed in study participants with advanced solid tumors.

Phase I/II Clinical Study of PRaG Regimen Combined With Intraperitoneal Infusion of PD-1 Inhibitor for Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors With Cancerous Ascites (PRaG4.0P Study).

Objective: The prognosis of malignant tumors with peritoneal metastases and cancerous ascites has generally been poor, with limited treatment options. The PRaG regimen, which comprised of hypofractionated radiotherapy, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), showed a survival advantage in patients with advanced solid tumors who failed at least the first line of standard systemic treatment. Intraperitoneal infusion of PD-1 inhibitors may be a novel therapeutic strategy for managing malignant ascites. Integrating the PRaG regimen with intraperitoneal perfusion of a PD-1 inhibitor might control malignant ascites and provide further survival benefits in these patients. This proposed study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal infusion of serplulimab in combination with the PRaG regimen in patients with simultaneous advanced solid tumors and cancerous ascites who fail at least the first-line treatment. Methods: This proposed study is a prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicenter clinical trial. All eligible patients will receive 2 cycles of intensive treatment, a combination of PRaG regimen with an intraperitoneal infusion of PD-1 inhibitor. The patients who are beneficially treated with intensive treatment will receive consolidation treatment every 2 weeks until ascites disappear, disease progression occurs, intolerable toxicity occurs, or for up to 1 year. Phase I of this study will be conducted using a modified 3 + 3 design. The dose of intraperitoneal infusion of PD-1 inhibitor for phase II will be determined according to dose-limiting toxicity evaluation in the phase I study. Conclusion: This prospective, open-label, multicenter study will potentially lead to intraperitoneal perfusion of a PD-1 inhibitor being a new strategy for malignant ascites patients and provide a meaningful efficacy and safety of the combination of PRaG regimen with an intraperitoneal infusion of PD-1 inhibitor for these patients.

Prior to ABOi liver transplant with PD-1 inhibitor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is a unique and effective method for treating end-stage liver diseases and acute liver failure, bringing hope to many patients with liver cancer. LT is currently widely used in the treatment of liver diseases. However, there have been no patients with liver cancer who have undergone ABO-incompatible (ABOi) LT after treatment with the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor reported in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A patient with liver cancer who received sintilimab injection, an anti-PD1 therapy, before LT was admitted in the transplantation centre. This patient underwent ABOi LT. The perioperative treatment strategy of this patient was reported. A desensitisation protocol was conducted urgently for the patient before operation, and the immunosuppression programme of LT was adjusted. After operation, isoagglutinin titer and liver function indicators were strictly monitored. The patient recovered well after operation, and no sign of rejection reaction was observed. CONCLUSION: We reported a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received PD-1 inhibitor treatment before operation and successfully underwent ABOi LT. The present case report provides novel insights into the perioperative management of utilizing PD-1 inhibitors prior to ABOi LT in patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Dual immunotherapy alternating with anti-PD-1 antibody plus liposomal doxorubicin show good efficacy in prostate epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a case report.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare vascular malignancy, and currently, there is no standard treatment regimen for this disease and existing treatment options have limited efficacy. In this case report, we present a patient with lung and lymph node metastases from prostate epithelioid hemangioendothelioma who achieved a significant partial response. This was accomplished through alternating nivolumab therapy with ipilimumab and liposomal doxorubicin, resulting in a progression-free-survival more than 6 months to date. The treatment was well-tolerated throughout. Our report suggests that dual immunotherapy alternating with anti-PD-1antibody plus doxorubicin may be a potential treatment modality for epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. However, larger sample studies are necessary to ascertain the effectiveness of this treatment strategy and it is essential to continue monitoring this patient to sustain progression-free survival and overall survival.

Enhancing safety and therapeutic efficacy: PD-1 inhibitor and recombinant human endostatin combination in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the therapeutic efficacy of combining a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor with recombinant human endostatin in patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 83 patients with advanced NSCLC who received treatment at Xi'an Daxing Hospital between May 2020 and July 2022. Among them, 42 patients were treated with a PD-1 inhibitor combined with recombinant human endostatin (observation group), while 41 patients received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (control group). We evaluated the objective response rate, changes in serum tumor markers pre- and post-treatment, occurrence of adverse reactions, progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year survival rate, and identified independent risk factors affecting prognosis in both groups. RESULTS: The treatment efficacy in the observation group significantly surpassed that in the control group. Following treatment, the levels of cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 125 decreased significantly in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.001). There was no notable difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P < 0.001). The median PFS and 1-year survival rate were notably higher in the observation group (P < 0.001). Age, liver metastasis, and treatment regimen emerged as independent risk factors affecting poor prognosis in patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Combining a PD-1 inhibitor with recombinant human endostatin in patients with advanced NSCLC not only enhances clinical efficacy but also increases PFS and the 1-year survival rate while ensuring treatment safety. This combination therapy shows promise for clinical application.

Budget impact analysis of the novel PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab versus pembrolizumab in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

AIM: To estimate the budget impact of adding a toripalimab regimen as a treatment option to the existing pembrolizumab regimen, both including gemcitabine and cisplatin, in untreated recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) using the published wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) and average sales price (ASP). METHODS: Budget impact analysis comparing a treatment mix "without" versus "with" the toripalimab regimen in the US eligible annual incident R/M NPC population, a 3-year time horizon, toripalimab/pembrolizumab market splits of 60/40 (Y1) and 80/20 (Y2/3), and medication adjustments for discontinuation or progression. Cost inputs included drugs, administration, and adverse event (AE) management. The models were replicated for a hypothetical 1-million-member health plan in which costs per-member-per-month (PMPM) and per-member-per-year (PMPY) were estimated. One-way (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) as well as scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the "without" scenario, the 3-year WAC-based costs for the pembrolizumab regimen total $1,449,695,333 ($1,305,632,448 for treatment and $144,062,885 for managing AEs). In the "with" scenario, total 3-year costs for pembrolizumab decline to $380,012,135 with toripalimab adding $885,505,900 ($779,206,567 for treatment and $106,299,333 for AE management). Annual net savings range from $46,526,152 in 2024 to $71,194,214 in 2026, for 3-year savings of $184,177,298. Associated net savings in a 1-million-member health plan are $543,068 over 3 years with savings of $0.045 PMPM and $0.543 PMPY. The ASP-based model shows similar patterns with 3-year net savings of $174,235,983 in the US incident population and savings of $0.043 PMPM and $0.514 PMPY in a 1-million-member health plan. The PSA support base case findings; OWSA and scenario analyses reveal how parameter variability impacts results. CONCLUSION: Savings between $174 million and $184 million can be achieved from treating 60% of R/M NPC patients in year 1 and 80% in years 2 and 3 with the toripalimab regimen over a similar pembrolizumab regimen.

Toripalimab, a human monoclonal anti-body that targets PD-1, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first-line treatment of adults with metastatic or recurrent, locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin. We evaluated how much it would cost a payor to cover the FDA-approved toripalimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen (the toripalimab regimen) to a non-FDA-approved pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen (the pembrolizumab regimen). With no trial data available for such pembrolizumab regimen, we assumed that it would be comparable to the toripalimab regimen in efficacy and safety. Our model adopted a 3-year time horizon and assumed a 60/40 market share split in year 1 and an 80/20 market split in years 2 and 3. It included two US cost inputs: the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) or "list price" at market entry and, as no average sales price (ASP) will be available for toripalimab for several quarters, a toripalimab price point of 80% of the pembrolizumab ASP. We adjusted for patients whose cancer progressed or who discontinued treatment to determine the number of fully-treated-patient-equivalents. We found that treating 60% of NPC patients in year 1 and 80% in years 2 and 3 with the toripalimab regimen instead of the pembrolizumab regimen generates, for the entire adjusted patient population, savings ranging from $174 million when using ASP to $184 million when using WAC.

Value of prognostic nutritional index and controlling nutritional status score for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in predicting response and prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in patients who received PD-1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC. Patients were assigned by immunotherapy effects into response (partial and complete response, pCR) group (n=52) and non-response (non-pCR) group (n=132). The pathological and clinical data were collected for statistical analysis of factors influencing the immunotherapeutic response. The diagnostic value of PNI and CONUT score for response was assessed. The overall survival (OS) was observed over a 3-year follow-up. COX regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors affecting the survival. The effects of different PNI and CONUT scores on the survival were observed. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analysis showed that, the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (P=0.001), PNI (P<0.001), and CONUT score (P<0.001) were associated with response. The non-pCR group had a higher 3-year mortality rate and a shorter 3-year OS than the pCR group (P<0.001). COX regression analysis showed that low PNI and high CONUT score were risk factors for poor prognosis. Further analysis showed that patients with low PNI and high CONUT score had lower 3-year survival rates (P=0.005, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: High TNM stage, PNI<50, and CONUT score ≥5 are risk factors for poor response in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PD-1 inhibitors, and low PNI and high CONUT score suggest poor prognosis.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (AG regimen) combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: Data of 52 patients with advanced PC who were treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (Xuzhou, China) between August 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment regimen, patients were divided into two groups, including 27 patients in the chemotherapy group (AG regimen) and 25 patients in the combined treatment group (AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. The survival curves of the two groups were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences in PFS and OS between the two groups were compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors influencing prognosis. RESULTS: The median OS and PFS in the combined treatment group were significantly longer than those in the chemotherapy group (OS, 12.8 vs. 7.9 months, P = 0.005; PFS, 5.6 vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in ORR between the two groups (32.0 % vs. 25.9 %, P = 0.629), and DCR in the combined treatment group was significantly better than that in the chemotherapy group (84.0 % vs. 59.3 %, P = 0.049). Grade 1-2 adverse reactions were predominant in both groups, and no adverse reaction-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Compared with chemotherapy alone, AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors exhibited to have a higher efficacy for the first-line treatment of advanced PC, and the adverse reactions were also controllable.

Cost-efficiency and budget-neutral expanded access modeling of pembrolizumab versus the novel PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab in locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.

AIMS: To estimate in a panel of patients with locally advanced/metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with a programmed death receptor-1 inhibitor in the US in 2024 (1) the cost-efficiency of toripalimab regimens compared to pembrolizumab regimens; and (2) the budget-neutral expanded access to additional toripalimab cycles and regimens from accrued savings. METHODS: Simulation modeling of toripalimab + pemetrexed + carboplatin in nonsquamous NSCLC to a similar pembrolizumab regimen in a panel of 49,647 patients; utilizing two cost inputs (wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) at market entry and an estimated ex ante toripalimab price point of 80% of pembrolizumab average sales price (ASP)) plus administration costs over one and two years of treatment with treatment rates from 1%-10%. Scenario analyses with treatment durations equivalent to toripalimab and pembrolizumab trials' median PFS were also conducted. RESULTS: In the WAC-based models, toripalimab saves $2,223 per patient per cycle and $40,014 over 1 year of treatment ($77,805 over 2 years). Extrapolated to the 49,647-patient panel, estimated 1-year savings range from $19,865,840 (1% treatment rate) to $198,658,399 (10% rate). Reallocating these savings permits budget-neutral expanded access to an additional 1,753 (1% rate) to 17,533 (10% rate) toripalimab maintenance cycles or to an additional 97 (1% rate) to 972 (10%) full 1-year toripalimab regimens with all agents. Two-year savings range from $38,628,022 (1% rate) to $386,280,221 (10%). Reallocating these efficiencies provides expanded access ranging from 3,409 (1% rate) to 34,093 (10%) additional toripalimab cycles or to 97 to 973 full 2-year regimens. The ex ante ASP model showed similar results as did the scenario analyses but at a lower magnitude than the base case. CONCLUSION: Toripalimab generates significant savings that enable budget-neutral funding for up to 17,533 [34,093] additional maintenance cycles over one year [two years] with toripalimab + pemetrexed in nonsquamous NSCLC, or 972 [973] full one-year [two-year] regimens.

An estimated 49,647 patients with advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will be treated with a PD-1 inhibitor in the US in 2024. Toripalimab, a PD-1 inhibitor recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, has also been found to be beneficial in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC when used in combination with chemotherapy. We conducted an economic simulation of the costs of toripalimab + pemetrexed + carboplatin versus the costs of a similar regimen with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in the treatment of patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. Our simulation models used two US cost inputs for toripalimab: the wholesale acquisition cost or "list price" at market entry and, as no average sales price (ASP) will be available for toripalimab for several quarters, a hypothetical toripalimab price point of 80% of the pembrolizumab ASP. We compared the savings in each scenario when between 1% and 10% of the 49,647 nonsquamous NSCLC patients are treated with the toripalimab regimen. We then evaluated how these savings could be re-allocated, without requiring extra funding, to provide more patients with access to toripalimab treatment on a budget-neutral basis. We found that, if 1% of new cases of advanced/metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC were treated with toripalimab for 1 year, these savings are enough to purchase up to 1,753 additional toripalimab maintenance cycles; or these savings could provide up to an additional 97 patients with full one-year regimens with all agents (toripalimab + chemotherapy). If 10% of new cases were treated with toripalimab for 1 year, the savings are enough to purchase up to 17,533 additional toripalimab maintenance cycles; or these savings could provide up to an additional 972 patients with full one-year regimens with all agents.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Aims/Background The combination of lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor has demonstrated significant efficacy in treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of triple therapy that includes hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Patients with a primary diagnosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma between June 2020 and August 2023 were included in this study. Initially, 53 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled. Then, 13 patients were excluded based on the inclusion criteria, resulting in 40 patients included for analysis. Among them, 31 patients received triple therapy, including 16 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer C stage, 12 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B, and 3 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-A hepatocellular carcinoma patients. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate, while the secondary endpoints included the conversion resection rate, pathological complete response rate, pathological partial response rate, and treatment-related adverse events. Results The objective response rate was 80.65% at a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range: 12.6-55.8 months). Of the 14 patients (45.2%) who underwent conversion therapy and were eligible for surgery, 7 patients underwent liver resection and the remaining 7 patients underwent liver transplantation. The median interval between the start of triple therapy and surgery was 117 days, ranging from 25 to 215 days. The pathological complete response was observed in six patients (19.4%) and the pathological partial response rate in eight patients (25.8%). All adverse events occurred in 77.4% of the patients. Conclusion In patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, the combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitor exhibits favourable efficacy and well tolerability, achieving a desirable pathological complete response rate while maintaining manageable drug toxicity.

PD-1 inhibitor plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer.

Aim: The prognosis of high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) remains poor following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We investigated whether the effect of CCRT can be enhanced by programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of CCRT group (n = 82) and PD-1 inhibitor plus CCRT group (n = 70). Results: Compared with the CCRT group, the PD-1 inhibitor plus CCRT group had significantly higher objective response rate, median progression-free survival, leukopenia and fatigue. The addition of PD-1 inhibitor to CCRT showed a favorable trend in overall survival without statistical significance. Conclusion: PD-1 inhibitor plus CCRT presented a significant survival benefit and a manageable safety profile in high-risk LACC.

[Box: see text].

Case report: Regression after low-dose glucocorticoid therapy in a case of acute immune myocarditis induced by anti-PD-1 therapy for NSCLC.

Background: PD-1 inhibitors exhibit efficacy in managing unresectable/metastatic driver gene-negative NSCLC, albeit with potential immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among these, immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis (ICI-M) is rare yet lethal. This study presents the initial successful instance of ICI-M in a lung cancer patient, rescued by low-dose glucocorticoids post-deterioration during treatment. Case summary: A 78-year-old male with a medical history of stage IV pT3N2M1 NSCLC underwent four cycles of palliative chemotherapy, resulting in stable disease (SD). Subsequent to declining further chemotherapy, the patient was transitioned to a targeted therapy regimen comprising Anlotinib in conjunction with PD-1 inhibitor immunotherapy. On the 26th day post-administration of the PD-1 inhibitor, the patient manifested Grade 2 immune-mediated myocarditis. Treatment encompassing 1mg/kg methylprednisolone combined with immunoglobulin shock therapy was initiated for 3 days, achieving symptomatic control. Nonetheless, upon tapering methylprednisolone dosage to 4-8mg/3-4d, the condition deteriorated, necessitating transfer to the intensive care unit. Methylprednisolone dosage was escalated to 80mg/day for 3 days, followed by gradual reduction by one-third to two-thirds weekly, culminating in the patient's safe discharge from the hospital. Conclusion: Immune-related myocarditis linked to checkpoint inhibitors is often managed effectively with high-dose glucocorticoid therapy. However, in Asian populations, low-dose glucocorticoids are increasingly utilized for salvage therapy, yielding favorable outcomes and improving prognosis compared to European populations.