Prognostic and predictive impact of metastatic organ involvement on maintenance therapy in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: Subgroup analysis of patients treated within the PanaMa trial (AIO KRK 0212).

Despite molecular selection, patients (pts) with RAS wildtype mCRC represent a heterogeneous population including diversity in metastatic spread. We investigated metastatic patterns for their prognostic and predictive impact on maintenance therapy with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid ± panitumumab. The study population was stratified according to (1) number of involved metastatic sites (single vs multiple organ metastasis), liver-limited disease vs (2) liver metastasis plus one additional site, and (3) vs liver metastasis plus ≥two additional sites. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regressions were used to correlate efficacy endpoints. Single organ metastasis was observed in 133 pts (53.6%) with 102 pts (41.1%) presenting with liver-limited disease, while multiple organ metastases were reported in 114 pts (46.0). Multiple compared to single organ metastases were associated with less favorable PFS (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.93; P = .004) and OS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.98-1.93; P = .068) of maintenance therapy. While metastatic spread involving one additional extrahepatic site was not associated with clearly impaired survival compared to liver-limited disease, pts with liver metastasis plus ≥two additional sites demonstrated less favorable PFS (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.30-2.83; P < .001), and OS (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.51-3.76; P < .001) of maintenance therapy. Pmab-containing maintenance therapy appeared active in both pts with multiple (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86; P = .006) as well as to a lesser numerical extent in pts with single organ metastasis (HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.57-1.21; P = .332; Interaction P = .183). These data may support clinical decisions when EGFR-based maintenance therapy is considered.

Depth of response of induction therapy and consecutive maintenance treatment in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: An analysis of the PanaMa trial (AIO KRK 0212).

BACKGROUND: In patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, depth of response (DpR) has gained importance as a novel end-point in clinical trials. We investigated the overall DpR, as well as the prognostic and predictive impact of DpR to induction therapy (six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin [FU/FA], oxaliplatin [FOLFOX] and panitumumab [Pmab]) on consecutive maintenance therapy (FU/FA plus Pmab or FU/FA alone) in patients treated within the PanaMa trial. METHODS: Central radiological assessment was performed according to RECIST 1.1. DpR was defined as percentage change in tumour diameter within defined time intervals (induction therapy, maintenance therapy, total course of therapy). For prognostic and predictive analyses, median DpR (

Liquid biopsy to detect resistance mutations against anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of mortality worldwide, associated with a steadily growing prevalence. Notably, the identification of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations has markedly improved targeted CRC therapy by affording treatments directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and other anti-angiogenic therapies. However, the survival benefit conferred by these therapies remains variable and difficult to predict, owing to the high level of molecular heterogeneity among patients with CRC. Although classification into consensus molecular subtypes could optimize response prediction to targeted therapies, the acquisition of resistance mutations to targeted therapy is, in part, responsible for the lack of response in some patients. However, the acquisition of such mutations can induce challenges in clinical practice. The utility of liquid biopsy to detect resistance mutations against anti-EGFR therapy has recently been described. This approach may constitute a new standard in the decision algorithm for targeted CRC therapy.

Randomized phase II trial of FOLFIRI-panitumumab compared with FOLFIRI alone in patients with RAS wild-type circulating tumor DNA metastatic colorectal cancer beyond progression to first-line FOLFOX-panitumumab: the BEYOND study (GEMCAD 17-01).

PURPOSE: Panitumumab plus FOLFOX (P-FOLFOX) is standard first-line treatment for RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer. The value of panitumumab rechallenge is currently unknown. We assessed addition of panitumumab to FOLFIRI (P-FOLFIRI) beyond progression to P-FOLFOX in patients with no RAS mutations in liquid biopsy (LB). METHODS: In this randomized phase II trial, patients were assigned (3:2 ratio) to second-line P-FOLFIRI (arm A) or FOLFIRI alone (arm B). LB for circulating tumor DNA analysis was collected at study entry and at disease progression. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival. Two-stage Simon design required 85 patients to be included (EudraCT 2017-004519-38). RESULTS: Between February 2019 and November 2020, 49 patients were screened (16 RAS mutations in LB detected) and 31 included (18 assigned to arm A and 13 to arm B). The study was prematurely closed due to inadequate recruitment. Serious adverse events were more frequent in arm A (44% vs. 23%). Overall response rate was 33% (arm A) vs. 7.7% (arm B). Six-month progression-free survival rate was 66.7% (arm A) and 38.5% (arm B). Median progression-free survival was 11.0 months (arm A) and 4.0 months (arm B) (hazard ratio, 0.58). At disease progression, RAS or BRAF mutations in LB were found in 4/11 patients (36%) in arm A and 2/10 (20%) in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: The BEYOND study suggests a meaningful benefit of P-FOLFIRI beyond progression to P-FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with WT RAS status selected by LB. This strategy deserves further investigation.

Scanning electron microscopy of panitumumab-induced eyelash and hair alterations - Pili canaliculi

Abstract Panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor used in metastatic colorectal cancer; in addition to tumor cells, it acts on epidermal keratinocytes and on the outer root sheath and presents skin toxicity in up to 90% of cases. A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the eyelashes and hairs of a 65-year-old patient with eyelash trichomegaly, curly hair, and paronychia undergoing treatment with panitumumab. Grooving in the hair shafts were identified, which were more evident in the eyelashes. Similar to oral epidermal growth factor inhibitors (erlotinib and gefitinib), panitumumab can cause acquired pili canaliculi.

Scanning electron microscopy of panitumumab-induced eyelash and hair alterations - Pili canaliculi.

Panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor used in metastatic colorectal cancer; in addition to tumor cells, it acts on epidermal keratinocytes and on the outer root sheath and presents skin toxicity in up to 90% of cases. A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the eyelashes and hairs of a 65-year-old patient with eyelash trichomegaly, curly hair, and paronychia undergoing treatment with panitumumab. Grooving in the hair shafts were identified, which were more evident in the eyelashes. Similar to oral epidermal growth factor inhibitors (erlotinib and gefitinib), panitumumab can cause acquired pili canaliculi.

Sequential chemotherapy regimen of induction with panitumumab and paclitaxel followed by radiotherapy and panitumumab in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer unfit for platinum derivatives. The phase II, PANTERA/TTCC-2010-06 study.

BACKGROUND: Sequential treatment of Panitumumab (Pb) plus Paclitaxel (Px) as induction treatment (IT) followed by concurrent bioradiotherapy (Bio-RT) with Pb may be an alternative for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN) in patients ineligible for high-dose cisplatin therapy. METHODS: Phase II, single-arm, multicentre study, with two-stage design, in patients ≥ 18 years with stage III-IVa-b LA-SCCHN unfit for platinum. Patients received Px + Pb (9 weeks) as IT followed by Bio-RT + Pb. Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR) after IT, defined as: more than 70% of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to IT. Secondary end-points: progression-free survival, organ preservation rate, safety profile. RESULTS: Study ended prematurely (51 patients) due to slow recruitment. ORR: 66.7% (95% CI: 53.7-79.6), 8 (15.7%) CR and 26 (51.0%) PR. 39 patients (76%) completed radiotherapy (RT). Pb and/or Px-related adverse events (AEs) grade 3-4: 56.9% during IT and 63.4% during the concomitant phase, of which most common were skin toxicity (33.3%). Five deaths occurred during treatment, two of them (3.9%) were Pb and/or Px-related. CONCLUSIONS: Although underpowered, ORR was higher than the pre-specified boundary for considering the treatment active. Although Px + Pb as IT provides some benefit, the safety profile is worse than expected. To consider Pb + Px as IT as an alternative for platinum-unsuitable LA-SCCHN, further research/investigation would be needed.

First-line panitumumab plus docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results of a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Panitumumab is extensively used for RAS-WT metastatic colorectal cancer. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus first-line chemotherapy [docetaxel (DOC) and cisplatin (CIS)] in treatment-naïve advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients. METHODS: Phase II, open-label, single-arm study includes treatment-naïve advanced gastric or GEJ-ADC patients from ten Spanish centres. Patients received panitumumab (6 mg/kg) plus DOC and CIS (50 mg/m2 both) every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Primary endpoint: objective response rate (ORR); main secondary endpoints: disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), time to progressive disease (TTP), progression-free-survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included; median age: 67.8 (range 43.3-82.7) years, 68.2% male. The ORR was 27.3% (95% CI 15.0, 42.8); median PFS and OS: 5.0 (95% CI 3.6, 6.9) and 7.2 (5.5, 9.0) months, respectively. Median TTP, DCR and DoR: 5.3 (range 3.8-7.0) months, 70.5% (95% CI 54.8, 83.2%), and 4.8 (1.8, NE) months. Median panitumumab treatment duration: 11.9 (range 0.1-34.9) weeks; 25.0% patients had a dose reduction and 40.9% discontinued treatment. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs): 68.2%/22.2% patients. Most common AEs: asthenia (75.0%) and mucosal inflammation (54.5%). Serious AEs were experienced by 54.6% patients; 9.1%, 13.6%, and 15.9% related to panitumumab, DOC, and CIS, respectively. Three (6.8%) patients died due to AEs not related to study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of panitumumab to standard chemotherapy as the first-line treatment in advanced gastric or GEJ-ADC does not appear to improve the efficacy outcomes.

Sequential biological therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a cost comparison analysis for wildtype RAS mCRC patients in Brazil / Sequenciamento de biológicos em câncer colorretal metastático (CCRm): uma análise de comparação de custos para pacientes CCRm RAS selvagens no Brasil

Objective: To compare the treatment costs of different sequences of regimens including monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRCm) treatment for the Brazilian Supplementary Healthcare System. Methods:  Sixteen scenarios were analyzed, each one comparing a sequence of bevacizumab TML plus an anti-EGFR therapy in the third?line with another sequence without bevacizumab TML (non-Bev TML) in patients with CRCm wild-type RAS. The anti-EGFRs cetuximab and panitumumabwere included. The monthly and total costs of the therapeutic sequences were compared per patient. Results: The sequences with Bev TML were cost-saving in 50% of all scenarios, and especially observed over regimens starting with cetuximab in the first-line treatment. Regarding scenarios whichthe non-Bev TML sequences were less costly, they all started with bevacizumab followed by an anti-EGFR biologic drug. Conclusion: The Bev TML regimens were cost-saving compared to scenarios of non-Bev TML which started with cetuximab, and sequential use of bevacizumab beyond progression and the addition of an anti-EGFR biologic drug in the third-line for mCRC treatment. Considering the remaining scenarios in which Bev-TML was not cost-saving, those starting with Bev presented lower costs in total. Therefore, starting a treatment with bevacizumab seems to enable a more rational management of resource usage, as well as, to allow physicians to add a biologic drug in the third-line, potentially enhancing the long term management of wild-type RAS mCRC.

Objetivo: Comparar o custo de tratamento de diferentes sequências de regimes incluindo anticorpos monoclonais no tratamento de câncer colorretal metastático (CCRm) no Sistema de Saúde Suplementar Brasileiro. Métodos: Dezesseis cenários foram analisados, cada um comparando umasequência de bevacizumabe TML (Bev TML) mais um anti-EGFR em terceira linha, com outra sequência sem bevacizumabe TML (não-Bev TML). Os anti-EGFRs cetuximabe e panitumumabe forma incluídos. Os custos mensais e totais do sequenciamento terapêutico foram comparados por pacientes. Resultados: As sequências com Bev TML trouxeram economia de recursos em 50% de todos os cenários, e especialmente comparado aos regimes iniciando com cetuximabe em primeira linha detratamento. Considerando os cenários em que os regimes não-Bev TML apresentaram menos custo, todos iniciaram o sequenciamento com bevacizumabe seguido de um medicamento biológico anti-EGFR. Conclusões: Os regimes Bev TML apresentaram economia de recursos comparado aos cenários com não-Bev TML que iniciaram com cetuximabe, apesar do uso de bevacizumabe em múltiplas linhas e da adição de medicamento biológico anti-EGFR em terceira linha no tratamento de CCRm. Considerando os demais cenários em que os regimes Bev-TML não apresentaram economia de recursos, os regimes iniciando com Bev apresentaram menor custo total. Desta maneira, iniciar o tratamento com bevacizumabe proporciona um gerenciamento mais racional de uso de recursos, assim como, permite aos médicos adicionar um medicamento biológico em terceira linha, potencialmente melhorando o manejo a longo prazo do CCRm com RAS selvagem.

Effectiveness and safety of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of chemotherapy (CT) for select cases of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) has been well established in the literature, however, it provides limited benefits and in many cases constitutes a treatment with high toxicity. The use of specific molecular biological treatments with monoclonal antibodies (MA) has been shown to be relevant, particularly for its potential for increasing the response rate of the host to the tumour, as these have molecular targets present in the cancerous cells and their microenvironment thereby blocking their development. The combination of MA and CT can bring a significant increase in the rate of resectability of metastases, the progression-free survival (PFS), and the global survival (GS) in MCRC patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of MA in the treatment of MCRC. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out with a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comparing the use of cetuximab, bevacizumab, and panitumumab in the treatment of MCRC. RESULTS: Sixteen randomised clinical trials were selected. The quality of the evidence on the question was considered moderate and data from eight randomised clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. The GS and PFS were greater in the groups which received the MA associated with CT, however, the differences were not statistically significant between the groups (mean of 17.7 months versus 17.1 months; mean difference of 1.09 (CI: 0.10-2.07); p = 0.84; and 7.4 versus 6.9 months. mean difference of 0.76 (CI: 0.08-1.44); p = 0.14 respectively). The meta-analysis was not done for any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: The addition of MA to CT for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer does not prolong GS and PFS.

Efectos del bloqueo del sistema EGF/EGFR sobre la cicatrización de las heridas en pacientes oncológicos / Effects of the blockade of EGF/EGFR system on wound healing cancer patients

La administración de drogas que bloquean el sistema del factor de crecimiento epidérmico y su receptor ha demostrado efectos beneficiosos en pacientes con tumores sólidos de origen epitelial. Cada día resulta más frecuente el uso de múltiples modalidades terapéuticas para combatir estos tumores, las cuales incluyen la asociación de agentes blanco y cirugía. Los agentes que actúan sobre dicho sistema pudieran causar trastornos de la cicatrización al bloquear vías del sistema que también intervienen en la cicatrización de las heridas. El objetivo de este artículo es revisar y comentar acerca del conocimiento de la relación entre el uso de las drogas anti-EGF/EGFR y los trastornos en la cicatrización de las heridas. La búsqueda bibliográfica se realizó en PubMed y Google (solo en español e inglés) y se tuvo en cuenta cualquier publicación encontrada hasta enero del 2014. Se incluyeron los anticuerpos monoclonales cetuximab, panitumumab y nimotuzumab; las pequeñas moléculas erlotinib y gefitinib y las vacunas terapéuticas contra el cáncer CIMAvax EGF y HER-1. Se hace especial énfasis en los biofarmacéuticos nimotuzumab, CIMAvax EGF y HER-1; producidos en el Centro de Inmunología Molecular, La Habana, Cuba, debido a su amplio uso en Cuba y otros países de América Latina. No se encontraron evidencias de relación entre el uso de estos productos y la aparición de trastornos en la cicatrización de las heridas. Dado que los tratamientos anti-EGF/EGFR también inhiben la proliferación celular que induce el drenaje de las heridas y la migración celular inducida por las radiaciones, se sugiere que el tratamiento anti-EGF/EGFR no debe suspenderse, ni antes ni después de la cirugía y sus posibles efectos deben ser vigilados. Obviamente, se necesitan ulteriores investigaciones por parte de los farmacólogos no clínicos y clínicos, oncólogos clínicos y cirujanos oncológicos para entender mejor los procesos fisiopatológicos de cicatrización en los cánceres de origen epitelial(AU)

The use of blocking drugs for epidermal growth factor and its receptor system has shown beneficial effects in patients with solid tumors of epithelial origin. It is increasingly common to use a multi-modal treatment approach towards solid tumors, often including the association of target agents and surgical resection. Some target agents can impair wound healing or cause increasing risk of perioperative complications if they block system pathways that may intervene in wound healing. The objective of this paper was to review and comment on the existing knowledge about the relationship between the use of anti-EGF/EGFR drugs and the disorders in wound healing. Citations from PubMed and Google (English and Spanish languages only) regardless of the date of publication were reviewed to identify potentially useful articles until January 2014. Monoclonal antibodies cetuximab, panitumumab, nimotuzumab; the small molecules erlotinib and gefitinib, and the therapeutic cancer vaccines called CIMAvax EGF and HER-1. Special emphasis was made on biopharmaceuticals nimotuzumab, CIMAvax EGF and HER-1, all of them produced at the Center of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba, because of their extensive use in Cuba and many Latin-American countries. No evidence of association between the use of these products and the occurrence of complications in wound healing was found. Given that the anti-EGF/EGFR treatments also inhibit the tumor cell proliferation that wound drainage induces and the radiation-induced cell migration, it is suggested that that the administration of this kind of drugs should be kept before and after the surgery and consequently, its possible effects must be under surveillance. Obviously, non-clinical and clinical pharmacologists, clinical oncologists and surgeons need further researches for better understanding the pathophysiological wound healing processes in epithelial cancers(AU)

Efectos del bloqueo del sistema EGF/EGFR sobre la cicatrización de las heridas en pacientes oncológicos / Effects of the blockade of EGF/EGFR system on wound healing cancer patients

La administración de drogas que bloquean el sistema del factor de crecimiento epidérmico y su receptor ha demostrado efectos beneficiosos en pacientes con tumores sólidos de origen epitelial. Cada día resulta más frecuente el uso de múltiples modalidades terapéuticas para combatir estos tumores, las cuales incluyen la asociación de agentes blanco y cirugía. Los agentes que actúan sobre dicho sistema pudieran causar trastornos de la cicatrización al bloquear vías del sistema que también intervienen en la cicatrización de las heridas. El objetivo de este artículo es revisar y comentar acerca del conocimiento de la relación entre el uso de las drogas anti-EGF/EGFR y los trastornos en la cicatrización de las heridas. La búsqueda bibliográfica se realizó en PubMed y Google (solo en español e inglés) y se tuvo en cuenta cualquier publicación encontrada hasta enero del 2014. Se incluyeron los anticuerpos monoclonales cetuximab, panitumumab y nimotuzumab; las pequeñas moléculas erlotinib y gefitinib y las vacunas terapéuticas contra el cáncer CIMAvax EGF y HER-1. Se hace especial énfasis en los biofarmacéuticos nimotuzumab, CIMAvax EGF y HER-1; producidos en el Centro de Inmunología Molecular, La Habana, Cuba, debido a su amplio uso en Cuba y otros países de América Latina. No se encontraron evidencias de relación entre el uso de estos productos y la aparición de trastornos en la cicatrización de las heridas. Dado que los tratamientos anti-EGF/EGFR también inhiben la proliferación celular que induce el drenaje de las heridas y la migración celular inducida por las radiaciones, se sugiere que el tratamiento anti-EGF/EGFR no debe suspenderse, ni antes ni después de la cirugía y sus posibles efectos deben ser vigilados. Obviamente, se necesitan ulteriores investigaciones por parte de los farmacólogos no clínicos y clínicos, oncólogos clínicos y cirujanos oncológicos para entender mejor los procesos fisiopatológicos de cicatrización en los cánceres de origen epitelial(AU)

The use of blocking drugs for epidermal growth factor and its receptor system has shown beneficial effects in patients with solid tumors of epithelial origin. It is increasingly common to use a multi-modal treatment approach towards solid tumors, often including the association of target agents and surgical resection. Some target agents can impair wound healing or cause increasing risk of perioperative complications if they block system pathways that may intervene in wound healing. The objective of this paper was to review and comment on the existing knowledge about the relationship between the use of anti-EGF/EGFR drugs and the disorders in wound healing. Citations from PubMed and Google (English and Spanish languages only) regardless of the date of publication were reviewed to identify potentially useful articles until January 2014. Monoclonal antibodies cetuximab, panitumumab, nimotuzumab; the small molecules erlotinib and gefitinib, and the therapeutic cancer vaccines called CIMAvax EGF and HER-1. Special emphasis was made on biopharmaceuticals nimotuzumab, CIMAvax EGF and HER-1, all of them produced at the Center of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba, because of their extensive use in Cuba and many Latin-American countries. No evidence of association between the use of these products and the occurrence of complications in wound healing was found. Given that the anti-EGF/EGFR treatments also inhibit the tumor cell proliferation that wound drainage induces and the radiation-induced cell migration, it is suggested that that the administration of this kind of drugs should be kept before and after the surgery and consequently, its possible effects must be under surveillance. Obviously, non-clinical and clinical pharmacologists, clinical oncologists and surgeons need further researches for better understanding the pathophysiological wound healing processes in epithelial cancers(AU)

Advances and new perspectives in the treatment of metastatic colon cancer.

During the last decade we have witnessed an unprecedented outburst of new treatment approaches for the management of metastatic colon cancer. Anti-angiogenic drugs, epidermal growth factor receptor blockers and multi-kinase inhibitors have all resulted in small but consistent improvement in clinical outcomes. However, this progress has paradoxically leaded us into new challenges. In many cases the clinical development was done in parallel and the lack of head-to-head comparison evolved into circumstances where several valid new "standards of care" are available. Even though desirable in essence, the availability of many options as well as different possible combinations frequently leaves the busy clinician in the difficult situation of having to choose between one or the other, sometimes without solid evidence to support each decision. In addition, progress never stops and new agents are continuously tested. For these reason this review will try to summarize all the clinical trials that constitute the theoretical framework that support our daily practice but will also procure the reader with rational answers to common clinical dilemmas by critically appraising the current literature. Lastly, we will provide with a compilation of promising new agents that may soon become our next line of defense against this deadly disease.