Influence of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery on perioperative indicators, postoperative recovery, and serum inflammation in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Conventional five-port laparoscopic surgery, the current standard treatment for colorectal carcinoma (CRC), has many disadvantages. AIM: To assess the influence of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) on perioperative indicators, postoperative recovery, and serum inflammation indexes in patients with CRC. METHODS: The study included 115 patients with CRC admitted between December 2019 and May 2023, 52 of whom underwent conventional five-port laparoscopic surgery (control group) and 63 of whom underwent RPLS (research group). Comparative analyses were performed on the following dimensions: Perioperative indicators [operation time (OT), incision length, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), and rate of conversion to laparotomy], postoperative recovery (first postoperative exhaust, bowel movement and oral food intake, and bowel sound recovery time), serum inflammation indexes [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6)], postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, incisional infection, bleeding, ileus), and therapeutic efficacy. RESULTS: The two groups had comparable OTs and IBL volumes. However, the research group had a smaller incision length; lower rates of conversion to laparotomy and postoperative total complication; and shorter time of first postoperative exhaust, bowel movement, oral food intake, and bowel sound recovery; all of which were significant. Furthermore, hs-CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α levels in the research group were significantly lower than the baseline and those of the control group, and the total effective rate was higher. CONCLUSION: RPLS exhibited significant therapeutic efficacy in CRC, resulting in a shorter incision length and a lower conversion rate to laparotomy, while also promoting postoperative recovery, effectively inhibiting the inflammatory response, and reducing the risk of postoperative complications.

Risk factors associated with intraoperative persistent hypotension in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative persistent hypotension (IPH) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is linked to adverse postoperative outcomes, yet its risk factors remain unclear. AIM: To clarify the risk factors associated with IPH during PD, ensuring patient safety in the perioperative period. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patient records from January 2018 to December 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University identified factors associated with IPH in PD. These factors included age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, comorbidities, medication history, operation duration, fluid balance, blood loss, urine output, and blood gas parameters. IPH was defined as sustained mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg, requiring prolonged deoxyepinephrine infusion for > 30 min despite additional deoxyepinephrine and fluid treatments. RESULTS: Among 1596 PD patients, 661 (41.42%) experienced IPH. Multivariate logistic regression identified key risk factors: increased age [odds ratio (OR): 1.20 per decade, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.33] (P < 0.001), longer surgery duration (OR: 1.15 per additional hour, 95%CI: 1.05-1.26) (P < 0.01), and greater blood loss (OR: 1.18 per 250-mL increment, 95%CI: 1.06-1.32) (P < 0.01). A novel finding was the association of arterial blood Ca2+ < 1.05 mmol/L with IPH (OR: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.65-2.50) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IPH during PD is independently associated with older age, prolonged surgery, increased blood loss, and lower plasma Ca2+.

Impact of introducing 3D printing-assisted surgery into clinical practice for traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures.

Background: Given the novelty of three-dimensional (3D) printing-assisted fracture surgery in orthopaedics, surgeon familiarity is limited and learning curve is high. As such, it is unclear how the introduction of 3D printing into clinical practice for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery would impact perioperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of introducing 3D printing-assisted surgery on perioperative outcomes for traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures. Methods: We retrospectively identified consecutive patients who underwent surgical fixation of traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures from 2018 to 2022 at a single tertiary hospital. The patients included in the study were divided into two groups: (1) 3D printing-assisted surgery and (2) conventional surgery. Baseline demographics and perioperative outcomes of total surgical duration, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, number fluoroscopy images, fluoroscopy duration and postoperative disposition were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: In total, 26 patients were included in the present study, with 3D printing-assisted surgery being used in 34.6 % (n = 9) of cases. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics or fracture type between the 3D printing group and conventional group. As compared to patients who underwent conventional surgery, those that underwent 3D printing-assisted surgery had, on average, shorter surgical duration (299.8 ± 88.2 vs 309.1 ± 143.1 min), lesser estimated blood loss (706.3 ± 330.0 vs 800.0 ± 584.2 ml), lower transfusion rates (50.0 % vs 52.9 %), lower number of intraoperative fluoroscopy images (62.8 ± 74.5 vs 71.6 ± 47.9 images) and shorter fluoroscopy duration (235.0 ± 79.2 vs 242.3 ± 83.5 min), although statistical significance was not achieved. None of the patients in the present study developed surgical complications postoperatively. Conclusion: The introduction of 3D printing-assisted surgery in clinical practice for pelvic and acetabular fractures is a safe and viable adjunct in pelvic and acetabular surgery, achieving comparable perioperative outcomes in the initial phase.

How to Prevent Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury in Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation? A Randomized Prospective Study.

Objective: Intraoperative mechanical ventilation practices can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and postoperative pulmonary complications in healthy lungs. Mechanical power (MP) has been developed as a new concept in reducing the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications as it considers all respiratory mechanics that cause VILI. The most commonly used intraoperative modes are volume control ventilation (VCV) and pressure control ventilation (PCV). In this study, VCV and PCV modes were compared in terms of respiratory mechanics in patients operated in the supine and prone positions. Methods: The patients were divided into 4 groups (80 patients), volume control supine and prone, pressure control supine and prone with 20 patients each. MP, respiratory rate, positive end-expiratory pressure, tidal volume, peak pressure, plato pressure, driving pressure, inspiratory time, height, age, gender, body mass index, and predictive body weight data of the patients included in the groups have been obtained from "electronic data pool" with Structured Query Language queries. Results: The supine and prone MP values of the VCV group were statistically significantly lower than the PCV group (P values were 0.010 and 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Supine and prone MP values of the VCV group were calculated significantly lower than the PCV group. Intraoperative PCV may be considered disadvantageous regarding the risk of VILI in the supine and prone positions.

RELEVANCE OF THE "APOIO" PROTOCOL IN THE PRE-OPERATIVE EVALUATION OF ELDERLY PEOPLE / RELEVÂNCIA DO PROTOCOLO "APOIO" NA AVALIAÇÃO CIRÚRGICA PRÉ-OPERATÓRIA DE IDOSOS

Introduction: Chronological age should not be considered a contraindication or impediment to performing any medical procedure, as long as there is a technical indication for it. This is because chronological and biological ages are not always equivalent. The aging process is heterogeneous and individual, varying according to genetic, environmental and socioeconomic factors. Objective: To review published care on multidimensional surgical care for the elderly and the role that the APOIO protocol can have in decision-making. Method: Integrative review carried out by collecting information published on virtual platforms in Portuguese and English. Initially, a search was carried out for descriptors related to the topic and identified through DeCS using the following terms: "preoperative evaluation, elderly, fractures, perioperative complications, and surgery" and articles that used the APOIO protocol with AND or OR search, considering the title and/or abstract. Afterwards, considering only those that were most related to the topic, the full texts were read. Result: 21 articles were included. Conclusion: APOIO is a multidimensional assessment that communicates geriatrics with anesthesiology and surgical specialties, integrating clinicians and surgeons in decision-making regarding surgical treatment for the elderly. It offers a conclusion with a written text that summarizes which systems are vulnerable, recommending perioperative care and precautions to be adopted to minimize the risks of the procedure.

Introdução : A idade cronológica não deve ser encarada como contraindicação ou impedimento para realização de qualquer procedimento médico, desde que haja indicação técnica para tal. Isso porque nem sempre as idades cronológica e biológica são equivalentes. O processo de envelhecimento é heterogêneo e individual, variando de acordo com fatores genéticos, ambientais e socioeconômicos . Objetivo : Revisar os cuidados publicados sobre o atendimento cirúrgico multidimensional do idoso e o papel que o protocolo APOIO pode ter na tomada de decisão. Método : Revisão integrativa feita coletando informações publicadas em plataformas virtuais em português e inglês. Inicialmente foi realizada busca por descritores relacionados ao tema e identificadores por meio do DeCS utilizando-se os seguintes termos: " avaliação pré-operatória, idosos, fraturas, complicações perioperatórias, e cirurgia " e artigos que utilizaram o protocolo APOIO com busca AND ou OR , considerando o título e/ou resumo. Após, considerando-se somente os que tinham maior relação ao tema, foi realizada a leitura na íntegra dos textos. Resultado : Foram incluídos 24 artigos. Conclusão : APOIO é uma avaliação multidimensional que comunica a geriatria com anestesiologia e especialidades cirúrgicas, integrando clínicas e cirurgias na tomada de decisão quanto ao tratamento cirúrgico ao idoso. Ela oferece conclusão com texto escrito que resume quais os sistemas vulneráveis ​​recomendando cuidados perioperatórios e eventualmente sendo adotados para minorar os riscos do procedimento.

MULTIDIMENSIONAL PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION AND ITS ROLE IN PREVENTING PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS WITH FRACTURES / AVALIAÇÃO PRÉ-OPERATÓRIA MULTIDIMENSIONAL E SEU PAPEL NA PREVENÇÃO DE COMPLICAÇÕES PERIOPERATÓRIAS EM IDOSOS COM FRATURAS

Introduction: Elderly patients have higher rates of morbidity and mortality during hospitalizations, diagnostic and surgical procedures. In order to improve the quality of care for the elderly, the APOIO (Preoperative Assessment of Elderly and Care Guidance) protocol was created, a tool to measure the risks of surgical complications. Objective: To evaluate the impact of APOIO on several outcomes, in order to validate it as a useful vehicle in the prevention of perioperative complications in elderly patients with fractures. Method: Retrospective cross-sectional study through review of 218 medical records of elderly patients hospitalized for fractures, and with surgical indication, having collected data on sex, age, reason for hospitalization, type of fracture, indication or not of surgical treatment, evaluation or not by APOIO, indication or not of ICU in the postoperative period, length of ICU stay, total length of hospitalization, immediate outcome and outcome within 30 days after the operation. Result: It was found that the application of APOIO was associated with a 70% reduction in the chances of death during hospitalization (p=0.040), length of stay in the ICU (p<0.001) and total length of hospital stay (p = 0.010). There was also a trend towards a reduction in the death rate within 30 days of the postoperative period (p = 0.117). Conclusion: The application of the APOIO tool reduces the length of hospitalization, optimizes indication and length of stay in the ICU and, also, reduces the risk of death in elderly people undergoing surgical treatment for fractures.

Introdução: Pacientes idosos apresentam maior morbidade e mortalidade em internamentos hospitalares, procedimentos diagnósticos e cirúrgicos. Buscando melhorar a qualidade assistencial aos idosos foi criado o protocolo APOIO (Avaliação Pré-Operatória de Idosos e Orientação de cuidados), ferramenta para mensurar os riscos de complicações cirúrgicas. Objetivo: Avaliar o impacto do APOIO sobre vários desfechos, a fim de validá-lo como veículo útil na prevenção de complicações perioperatórias em idosos com fraturas. Método: Pesquisa retrospectiva transversal por meio de revisão de 218 prontuários de pacientes idosos internados por fraturas, e com indicação cirúrgica, tendo sido coletados dados sobre sexo, idade, motivo do internamento, tipo de fratura, indicação ou não de tratamento cirúrgico, avaliação ou não pela APOIO, indicação ou não de UTI no pós-operatório, duração do internamento em UTI, duração total do internamento, desfecho imediato e desfecho em 30 dias após a operação. Resultado: Foi constatado que a aplicação do APOIO foi associada à redução de 70% nas chances de óbito durante o internamento (p = 0,040), ao tempo de permanência em UTI (p <0,001) e ao tempo total de internamento hospitalar (p =  0,010). Observou-se ainda tendência à redução na taxa de óbitos em 30 dias do pós-operatório (p = 0,117). Conclusão: A aplicação da ferramenta APOIO reduz tempo de internamento, otimiza indicação e tempo de permanência em UTI e ainda diminui o risco de óbito de idosos submetidos a tratamentos cirúrgicos de fraturas.

Postoperative Adverse Events Following Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer in a Phase 2 Clinical Trial (Alliance A021501).

BACKGROUND: Postoperative adverse events (AEs) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PC) treated with neoadjuvant therapy and pancreatectomy in the national cooperative group setting have not been previously characterized. We conducted a preplanned secondary analysis of patients enrolled on the Alliance A021501 clinical trial to quantify perioperative AE rates. METHODS: The A021501 phase 2 trial randomized patients with BR-PC to receive 8 doses of mFOLFIRINOX (Arm 1) or 7 doses of mFOLFIRINOX and hypofractionated radiotherapy (Arm 2), followed by pancreatectomy (December 31, 2016 to May 31, 2019). Adverse events were assessed 90 days after pancreatectomy. RESULTS: Of 126 enrolled patients, 51 (40%) underwent pancreatectomy (n = 32, Arm 1; n = 19, Arm 2) at 28 institutions. Five (10%) patients required reoperation within 90 days; 56% of patients (n = 27/48) experienced at least one grade 3 or higher AE (50% vs. 67%, p = 0.37). Ninety-day mortality was 2.0%. Readmission was less frequent in Arm 1 (16% vs. 42%, p = 0.05), but there were no differences between study arms in rates of reoperation (13% vs. 5%), pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess requiring drainage (9% vs. 16%), or wound infection (6% vs. 16%). Pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess requiring drainage was associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy (p = 0.012). No difference in overall survival was observed based on occurrence of postoperative AEs (hazard ratio = 1.1; 95% confidence interval 0.5-2.6). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study, rates of postoperative AEs were consistent with those previously reported. Multimodality trials of preoperative therapy for BR-PC may be performed in the cooperative group setting with careful quality assurance and safety monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02839343.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Evaluation and Analysis of Surgical Efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited for the treatment of pancreatic cancer among minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: This retrospective analysis evaluated patients who underwent robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) or laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) from April 2016 to April 2023. Their baseline and perioperative data, including operative time, R0 resection rates, and severe complications rates, were analyzed, and the follow-up data, such as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), were collected. RESULTS: A total of 253 cases of LPD and RPD were performed, and 101 cases with pancreatic cancer were included, of which 54 were LPD and 47 were RPD. The conversion rate (4.3% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.001) and blood loss (400 vs. 575 mL, p < 0.05) were lower in the RPD group. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, vessel resection rates, and TNM-stage diagnosis; however, R0 resection rates (80.9% vs. 70.4%) and lymph node harvest (24.2 vs. 21.9) had a higher tendency in the RPD group, and postoperative length of stay was shorter in the RPD cohort (11 vs. 13 days). Moreover, improved 1- to 3-years DFS (75.7%, 61.7%, and 36.0% vs. 59.0%, 35.6%, and 21.9%) and OS (94.7%, 84.7%, and 50.8% vs. 84.1%, 63.6%, and 45.5%) was found in the RPD group in comparison with the LPD group. CONCLUSIONS: RPD had advantages in surgical safety and oncological outcomes compared with LPD, but was similar to the latter in perioperative outcomes. Long-term outcomes require further study.

High body mass index is associated with elevated risk of perioperative ischemic stroke in patients who underwent noncardiac surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) serves as a global metric for assessing obesity and overall health status. However, the impact of BMI, treated as a continuous variable, on the risk of perioperative stroke remains poorly understood. This retrospective cohort study aimed to elucidate the association between BMI and the risk of perioperative ischemic stroke in patients undergoing non-cardiovascular surgery. METHODS: A cohort of 223,415 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery at the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 1, 2008 and August 31, 2019 was screened. Preoperative high BMI, defined as BMI >22.64 kg/m2, was the primary exposure, and the outcome of interest was the new diagnosis of perioperative ischemic stroke within 30 days post-surgery. Robust controls for patient and intraoperative factors were implemented to minimize residual confounding. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were employed, and patients were stratified into subgroups for further investigation. RESULTS: The overall incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke was 0.23% (n = 525) in the cohort. After adjusting for patient-related variables (OR 1.283; 95% CI, 1.04-1.594; p < 0.05), surgery-related variables (OR 1.484; 95% CI, 1.2-1.849; p < 0.001), and all confounding variables (OR 1.279; 95% CI, 1.025-1.607; p < 0.05), patients with BMI >22.64 kg/m2 exhibited a significantly increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke. This association persisted in the propensity score matched cohort (OR 1.577; 95% CI, 1.203-2.073; p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses indicated that preoperative BMI >22.64 kg/m2 correlated with an elevated risk of perioperative ischemic stroke in female patients, those with coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular diseases, and individuals undergoing neurosurgery. CONCLUSION: We first identified BMI >22.64 kg/m2 as a substantial and independent risk factor for perioperative ischemic stroke in Chinese noncardiac surgery patients. Normal BMI may not suffice as a universal preventive standard. Instead, a more stringent perioperative weight management approach is recommended, particularly for specific subgroups such as female patients, those with coronary heart disease and peripheral vascular disease, and individuals scheduled for neurosurgery.

Perioperative management in pediatric domino liver transplantation for metabolic disorders: A narrative review.

Domino liver transplantation and domino-auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation are emerging techniques that can expand the liver donor pool and provide hope for children with liver disease. The innovative technique of domino liver transplantation has emerged as a pioneering strategy, capitalizing on structurally preserved livers from donors exhibiting single enzymatic defects within a morphologically normal context, effectively broadening the donor pool. Concurrently, the increasingly prevalent domino-auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation method assumes a critical role in bolstering available donor resources. These advanced transplantation methods present a unique opportunity for pediatric patients who, despite having structurally and functionally intact livers and lacking early signs of portal hypertension or extrahepatic involvement, do not attain priority on conventional transplant lists. Utilizing optimal clinical conditions enhances posttransplant outcomes, benefiting patients who would otherwise endure extended waiting periods for traditional transplantation. The perioperative management of children undergoing these procedures is complex and requires careful consideration of some factors, including clinical and metabolic conditions of the specific metabolic disorder, and the need for tailored perioperative management planning. Furthermore, the prudent consideration of de novo disease development in the recipient assumes paramount significance when selecting suitable donors for domino liver transplantation, as it profoundly influences prognosis, mortality, and morbidity. This narrative review of domino liver transplantation will discuss the pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, perioperative management, and prognostic expectations, focusing on perioperative anesthetic considerations for children undergoing domino liver transplantation.

Effect of Short-term Deep Breathing Exercises on Perioperative Anxiety and Pain in Pediatric Orthopedic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: There are currently no pediatric studies examining the effects of deep breathing on perioperative pain and anxiety. This study sought to determine the effect of short-term deep breathing exercises on perioperative anxiety and pain in pediatric patients and their parents. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery where pediatric patients about to undergo surgery were allocated to a control group or a deep breathing group. In the intervention group, patients and their main guardian were guided to practice 10 minutes of deep breathing exercises twice a day for 3 to 4 days prior to surgery. Perioperative anxiety and pain were measured for both the children and parents as outcome indicators. METHODS: Perioperative anxiety was measured using the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale-Short Form (mYPAS-SF) and state anxiety was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Patients reported their pain levels daily using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. The following cutoffs were determined as high levels of anxiety: STAI (adult) > 44, STAI (child) > 36, and mYPAS-SF ≥ 30. FINDINGS: No significant differences were found in the STAI, mYPAS-SF, and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale scores of the patients between the intervention and control group. Overall statistics showed that parents had significantly higher postoperative state anxiety levels toward female children (44.93 ± 9.01) compared to male children (40.18 ± 9.89). Preoperative and postoperative parental state anxiety levels were correlated with the child's postoperative anxiety. Furthermore, children's postoperative state anxiety was slightly correlated with postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term use of our deep breathing exercises was ineffective in reducing incidences of perioperative pain and anxiety in pediatric orthopedic patients. A longer period of deep breathing administration may be required for the intervention to be effective. Parental anxiety may have an effect on anxiety levels in children, and postoperative parental anxiety may be affected by the gender of the child.

Perioperative complications of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats alleviated by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells.

For acute ischemic stroke treatment, the limitations of treatment methods and the high incidence of perioperative complications seriously affect the survival rate and postoperative recovery of patients. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hucMSCs) have multi-directional differentiation potential and immune regulation function, which is a potential cell therapy. The present investigation involved developing a model of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by thrombectomy after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) for 90 min in rats and utilizing comprehensive multi-system evaluation methods, including the detection of brain tissue ischemia, postoperative survival rate, neurological score, anesthesia recovery monitoring, pain evaluation, stress response, and postoperative pulmonary complications, to elucidate the curative effect of tail vein injection of hucMSCs on MCAO's perioperative complications. Based on our research, it has been determined that hucMSCs treatment can reduce the volume of brain tissue ischemia, promote the recovery of neurological function, and improve the postoperative survival rate of MCAO in rats. At the same time, hucMSCs treatment can prolong the time of anesthesia recovery, relieve the occurrence of delirium during anesthesia recovery, and also have a good control effect on postoperative weight loss, facial pain expression, and lung injury. It can also reduce postoperative stress response by regulating blood glucose and serum levels of stress-related proteins including TNF-α, IL-6, CRP, NE, cortisol, ß-endorphin, and IL-10, and ultimately promote the recovery of MCAO's perioperative complications.

Coerced consent in clinical research: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the low-risk nature of participation in most clinical anesthesia trials, subject recruitment on the same day as surgery is often restricted due to the concerns of researchers and local research ethics boards that same-day consent may not afford adequate time and opportunity for patients to weigh and make decisions, as well as perceptions of patient vulnerability immediately prior to surgery that could impact the voluntary nature and the rigor of the informed consent process. However, specialties such as anesthesiology, critical care, interventional radiology, and emergency medicine have a varied pattern of practice and patient acquaintance that does not typically afford the luxury of time or, in many cases, advance consent for participation in research. Indeed, the initial encounter between anesthesiologists and patients undergoing elective procedures routinely occurs on the day of surgery. Concerns of coercion related to same-day consent for clinical anesthesia research trials have not been borne out in the literature, and represent a significant obstacle to clinical researchers, as well as to the patients who are denied opportunities for potential benefit through participation in research studies. METHODS: We describe the protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial examining the voluntariness of patient consent, solicited either in advance of surgery or on the same day, to participate in an anesthesia research study at Women's College Hospital. One hundred fourteen patients scheduled to undergo ambulatory anterior cruciate ligament repair facilitated by general anesthesia with an adductor canal block will be randomized for recruitment either (a) in the pre-operative assessment clinic before the day of surgery or (b) on the day of surgery, to be approached for consent to participate in a fabricated research study of adjunct medications in adductor canal blocks. Regardless of allocation, patients in both groups will receive the same routine standard of care and will complete a post-operative questionnaire to signal perceptions of undue influence in the process of providing informed consent for the fabricated trial. DISCUSSION: This study will inform trial design and practice guidelines surrounding the amount of time patients ought to be afforded in order to make durable decisions to participate (or not) in clinical research studies. This is expected to impact trial recruitment in a variety of clinical settings where researchers have only brief opportunities to interface with patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prospectively on the Open Science Framework (OSF), registration #46twc, on 2023-Mar-17.

Perioperative use of immersive head-mounted virtual reality display enhances patient satisfaction in great saphenous vein surgery: a single-center clinical observation study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application effect of head-mounted virtual reality display immersive experience in improving the perioperative satisfaction of patients undergoing great saphenous vein surgery. METHODS: A total of 158 patients undergoing saphenous vein surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University from January 2020 to January 2023 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group in a 1:1 ratio, with 79 cases in each group. The observation group received head-mounted display virtual reality immersive experience, whereas the control group received midazolam. The study compared the perioperative satisfaction, changes in preoperative and postoperative anxiety and depression scores, intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups. Additionally, the satisfaction of patients, anesthesiologists, and chief surgeons was compared. RESULTS: All surgeries were completed successfully. Patients in the observation group exhibited higher perioperative satisfaction compared to those in the control group (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in anxiety or depression scores between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05). However, both groups showed a reduction in anxiety and depression scores postoperatively, with the observation group demonstrating lower scores than the control group (both P<0.05). The observation group also had lower intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, postoperative VAS scores, and incidence of nausea and vomiting compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Furthermore, the satisfaction levels of the anesthesiologists and chief surgeons were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P=0.043, 0.012). CONCLUSION: Head-mounted display virtual reality immersive experience can enhance perioperative satisfaction among patients undergoing great saphenous vein surgery, reduce anxiety and depression scores, and contribute to the stabilization of hemodynamics during surgery, thereby decreasing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Effective Oral Indicators With Medical and Dental Collaboration in Open Heart Surgery: A Representative Survey.

Purpose Postoperative infections pose an important problem for patients with cardiac disease. Moreover, oral health status is associated with the risk of longer hospital stays. Therefore, the oral health status of patients was assessed before open-heart surgery. This study aimed to determine the relationship between oral health status and postoperative status. Methods The study included 25 patients who underwent open-heart surgery at our university hospital in 2020. Upon admission, dentists conducted an oral examination and assessed the oral health status of the patients, also using the Japanese version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT-J), Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG), oral moisture level, oral bacteria, and other relevant factors. The study investigated the association with postoperative status. Findings Significant postoperative infections were found in patients aged ≥70 years, with an OHAT-J score of ≥5, OHAT-J lip score of ≥1, Streptococcus γ count of 1.0 × 10^6 or higher (CFU/mL), and increased Streptococcus γ before and after surgery. The duration of hospitalization correlated with the OHAT-J, OHAT-J gum and tissue, and ROAG scores. The duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stays correlated with the OHAT-J score. Conclusions The study demonstrates that OHAT-J scores are linked with predicting not just postoperative infection but also the length of hospitalization and ICU stay. As OHAT-J scores do not necessitate specialized dental instruments, they are straightforward and beneficial for healthcare professionals outside of dentistry.

One-Hour Bundle Protocols for Surgical Sepsis and Septic Shock in Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Clinical Outcome Aspects in the Thai Context.

BACKGROUND: Surgical sepsis is a syndrome occurring during the perioperative period with a high mortality rate. Since the one-hour bundle protocol was recommended to decrease sepsis-related morbidity and mortality in clinical practice, the protocol has been applied to surgical patients with sepsis and septic shock. However, clinical outcomes in these surgical patients remain unknown. Thus, this study aimed to compare survival outcomes in patients before and after the implementation of one-hour bundle care in clinical practice. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 401 surgical patients with sepsis were divided into two groups, with 195 patients undergoing the one-hour bundle from December 25, 2021, to March 31, 2024, and 206 patients undergoing usual care from January 1, 2018, to December 24, 2021, before the one-hour bundle protocol was implemented by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC). Demographic data, treatment processes, and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: After the one-hour bundle protocol was applied in surgical practice, the median survival time was significantly increased in surgical patients who underwent one-hour bundle care (95% confidence interval (CI): 12.32-19.68) (p= 0.016). Factors influencing the increase in the mortality rate were delays in fluid resuscitation of >2 hours, vasopressor initiation of >2 hours, and empirical antibiotics of >5 hours (p= 0.017, 0.028, and 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: One-hour bundle care for surgical patients with sepsis resulted in an increased median survival time. Delays in fluid resuscitation (>2 hours), vasopressor initiation (>2 hours), and empirical antibiotics (>5 hours) were factors associated with mortality.

Association of Delta Neutrophil Index with the 30-day Mortality in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the predictive accuracy of 30-day mortality with delta neutrophil index (DNI) in adult cardiac surgical patients. Methods: This study enrolled patients who underwent cardiac surgery under general anesthesia between March 2016 and May 2022 at a tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea. DNI was measured preoperatively, on postoperative arrival to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU), and 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to identify the prediction accuracy of DNI. An area under ROC curve (AUROC) ≥0.700 was defined as satisfactory predictive accuracy. An optimal cutoff point for the DNI value to maximize predictive accuracy was revealed in the ROC curve, where [sensitivity + specificity] was maximum. Results: This study included a total of 843 patients in the final analyses. The mean age of the study population was 66.9±12.2 years and 38.4% of them were female patients. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 5.2%. Surgery involving the thoracic aorta, history of prior cardiac surgery, or emergency surgery were associated with a higher mortality rate. The DNI showed satisfactory predictive accuracy at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h postoperatively, with AUROC of 0.729, 0.711, and 0.755, respectively. The optimal cutoff points of DNI at each time point were 3.2, 3.8, and 2.3, respectively. Conclusions: Postoperative DNI is a good predictor of 30-day mortality after cardiac surgery and has the benefit of no additional financial costs or time.

Efficacy of parasternal peripheral nerve catheters versus no block for median sternotomy: a single-centre retrospective study.

Background: Sternal pain after cardiac surgery results in considerable discomfort. Single-injection parasternal fascial plane blocks have been shown to reduce pain scores and opioid consumption during the first 24 h after surgery, but the efficacy of continuous infusion has not been evaluated. This retrospective cohort study examined the effect of a continuous infusion of local anaesthetic through parasternal catheters on the integrated Pain Intensity and Opioid Consumption (PIOC) score up to 72 h. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy at a single academic centre before and after the addition of parasternal nerve catheters to a standard multimodal analgesic protocol. Outcomes included PIOC score, total opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents, and time-weighted area under the curve pain scores up to 72 h after surgery. Results: Continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% through parasternal catheters resulted in a significant reduction in PIOC scores at 24 h (-62, 95% confidence interval -108 to -16; P<0.01) and 48 h (-50, 95% CI -97 to -2.2; P=0.04) compared with no block. A significant reduction in opioid consumption up to 72 h was the primary factor in reduction of PIOC. Conclusions: This study suggests that continuous infusion of local anaesthetic through parasternal catheters may be a useful addition to a multimodal analgesic protocol in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with sternotomy. Further prospective study is warranted to determine the full benefits of continuous infusion compared with single injection or no block.

Development of a checklist framework for kidney transplantation.

Background: Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for end-stage kidney disease, and a fast-growing transplant procedure worldwide. Diverse clinical practices for recipients and donors' selection and management between transplant centers hinder the creation and dissemination of an anesthesia-surgical checklist. Methods: Components of the anesthesia-surgical checklist were selected after a review of the English literature using PubMed search for donor, recipient and graft protocols and outcomes of existing practices in the field of kidney transplantation. Key elements of the most relevant articles were combined with our own center's experience and formulated into the proposed checklist. The checklist is intended to be used perioperatively, once patient receives an offer. Results: The perioperative checklist centers primarily on the following donor and recipient's factors: (i) Review of the pretransplant candidate workup; (ii) Assessment of donor/graft status; (iii) Hypothermic machine perfusion parameters; (iv) Operating room management; (v) Sign out. The proposed kidney transplant checklist was designed to ensure consistency and completeness of diverse tasks and facilitates team communication and coordination. Conclusion: We present a novel standardized combined anesthesia-surgical checklist framework for kidney transplant aimed at increasing perioperative safety and streamline the perioperative care of recipients. Future validation studies will determine its clinical feasibility and post-implementation efficacy.