PET-PCR reveals low parasitaemia and submicroscopic malarial infections in Honduran Moskitia.

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains a main parasitic disease of humans. Although the largest number of cases is reported in the African region, there are still endemic foci in the Americas. Central America reported 36,000 malaria cases in 2020, which represents 5.5% of cases in the Americas and 0.015% of cases globally. Most malaria infections in Central America are reported in La Moskitia, shared by Honduras and Nicaragua. In the Honduran Moskitia, less than 800 cases were registered in 2020, considering it an area of low endemicity. In low endemicity settings, the number of submicroscopic and asymptomatic infections tends to increase, leaving many cases undetected and untreated. These reservoirs challenge national malaria elimination programmes. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of Light Microscopy (LM), a nested PCR test and a photoinduced electron transfer polymerase chain reaction (PET-PCR) in a population of febrile patients from La Moskitia. METHODS: A total of 309 febrile participants were recruited using a passive surveillance approach at the Puerto Lempira hospital. Blood samples were analysed by LM, nested PCR, and PET-PCR. Diagnostic performance including sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, kappa index, accuracy, and ROC analysis was evaluated. The parasitaemia of the positive samples was quantified by both LM and PET-PCR. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of malaria was 19.1% by LM, 27.8% by nPCR, and 31.1% by PET-PCR. The sensitivity of LM was 67.4% compared to nPCR, and the sensitivity of LM and nPCR was 59.6% and 80.8%, respectively, compared to PET-PCR. LM showed a kappa index of 0.67, with a moderate level of agreement. Forty positive cases by PET-PCR were not detected by LM. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that LM is unable to detect parasitaemia at low levels and that there is a high degree of submicroscopic infections in the Honduran Moskitia.

Single-round multiplex PCR with species-specific mitochondrial primers of P. falciparum, P. vivax/P. simium and P. malariae/P. brasilianum: Comparison with standard techniques.

A single-round multiplex PCR (mPCR) with species-specific primers (SSP) of three mitochondrial genes of Plasmodium, namely COX I, COX III and CYT B, was compared to microscopy and 18S rRNA semi-nested PCR, nested-PCR and Real Time PCRs (*PCRs). Each parasite has between 20 and 150 mitochondria and each mitochondria has one copy of each target gene, while 18S rRNA gene is repeated 4 to 8 times. The specificity of mPCR was assessed by testing Plasmodium from rodents and birds, parasites responsible for other endemic diseases in the country such as schistosomiasis, Chagas disease and leishmaniasis in addition to microorganisms that, like Plasmodium, can cause anemia (Bartonella henselae, Babesia vogeli, Rickettsia vini). No cross-reactions were detected. From a total of 149 specimens from suspected cases of malaria were tested, 97 were positive by microscopy (49 P. falciparum, 38 P. vivax, 6 P. malariae, 4 P. falciparum/P. vivax- mixed infections) and 52 were negative; 148 samples were positive by *PCRs (49 P. falciparum, 53 P. vivax, 7 P. malariae and 39 mixed infections) and one was negative; 146 were positive by mPCR (49 P. falciparum, 56 P. vivax, 9 P. malariae and 32 mixed infections) and three were negative. The comparison of groups found statistically significant differences between microscopy vs.*PCRs or vs. mPCR (p-values <0.0001), but no difference was found between mPCR vs. *PCRs (p=0.946). The agreement in the identification of Plasmodium species was only regular, with Kappa indices of 0.407 (microscopy vs. *PCRs), 0.433 (microscopy vs. mPCR) and 0.558 (*PCRs vs. mPCR). In conclusion, the diagnostic performance of mPCR was comparable to those of *PCRs, and superior to microscopy, although the identification of Plasmodium species showed many disagreements. In conclusion, a sensitive and specific one-round SSP multiplex PCR, capable of simultaneously detecting and identifying P. falciparum, P. vivax/P. simium and P. malariae/P. brasilianum may be useful in resource-constrained countries where quantitative amplifications are not yet fully accessible.